How did NASA go to the moon in something that wouldn't survive a strong breeze?
There's no wind on the moon retard.
>>769158051
That's not what he said, retard.
You're a dumb guy OP
>>769158254
You mean āIā
Obvious same fag is obvious
>>769158408
Correcting an anon obviously must mean I am a samefag. God people on /b/ are so retarded.
>>769157946
There are flat earth cells around the globe, op. tell us more
>>769158254
if it wouldent survive a strong breeze, what effect would it take in space where there is no wind?
>>769158254
There's no drag in space either, so why would it even matter if it was 'curtain rods and tape' (hint: its not)
>>769158503
>in something that wouldn't survive a strong breeze
He meant on Earth. No mention of wind on the moon.
>>769158503
G forces.
G forces can tear ur cock off m8.
>>769158589
It's on the moon, not earth.
>>769157946
>perfectly logical to think NASA got drunk one night and threw a piece of shit together honestly thinking it'd pass
The things flat earthers believe in... like a flat earth.
>>769158715
Yes I know. I'm sure the OP knows there's no wind on the moon. Something like solar ray could destroy it for example.
>>769158657
its inside the goddamn rocket retard. its not just tied on the side with a fucking rope
>>769158831
I mean solar wind. LOL.
>>769157946
List of people who did zero research before posting:
OP
>>769157946
It doesn't need to , those are titanium bars (strong and weight saving because it save a lot of fuel to put in orbit) . The foil and tape are different thin layers of nickel steel sheets that have the double purpose to be high temperature resistant and absorb the heat of the sun in the blackness of space . The you have 25 different layers of plastic , yes,plastic , coated with aluminium and gold to ensure thermal and radiation insulation , plus absorb the impacts of micrometeroids.
>>769158051
yes there is, why would there be no wind on the moon retard
>>769158954
It is crude , yes but effective and compatible with the resources at that time .
>>769158845
I was laughing at this also thinking OP has brain worms.
>>769158954
this, op nor the photo even starts to prove the information given, nobody ever does, they only state it as though it truth cause it makes more sense than the actual science and data knowledge required to understand a moon landing of which they have zero education to verify.
>>769158845
Being inside the rocket won't protect it from G forces.
Do you think you could build a house of cards in a car then launch the car and the cards wouldn't fall over?
Come on now, that looks like a dildo.
>>769157946
Tfw flat earthers are still cherry picking their arguments.
>>769157946
Why would it matter if thereās wind or not if the rocket couldnāt get past the glass dome of earth to get to the moon in the first place?
>>769157946
>>769158051
>>769158503
>>769158545
Okay, that's all good and well... in space. How does it get past that shit on EARTH, where it's launched from BEFORE they get it to space?
>>769160015
How about stop asking about elementary stuff and google it yourself ?
>>769160015
>What is the Saturn V
You don't fucking fly the lander to the moon
>>769158954
Thank you
>>769157946
>>769160015
There are dozen of animation /simulation on youtube that even a 3y old could understand... plus all the tenical stuff in hundresds of different internet sites , but yes, come to /b
>>769157946
Another well-researched thread, OP.
>>769160442
>>769160742
>google it nerd xD
Typical. So basically you have no argument.
>>769160551
Then how do we get it there, smartass?
>>769160887
If you try real hard, you might be able to read the other half of the post
>>769160015
>How does it get past that shit on EARTH, where it's launched from BEFORE they get it to space?
"I'll take 'Too Stupid To Use Google' for $200, Alex."
>>769160946
>>769160978
Still not seeing any arguments.
>>769161304
>wah do my homework for me because google is hard
no can do, kiddo
>>769161304
What's to argue about? There's literally thousands of websites containing whatever level of detail you're looking for.
Why should anyone here re-type already-great source material?
>>769161430
I'm just asking questions. You're the one making ridiculous claims, it's your job to provide proof. If what you say is so unquestionably true, then in the time it takes you to tell me to google it 20 times, you could write up a simple explanation for me.
If they faked the craft, why wouldn't they make it look like people's expectations, why not make a sleek metal model like you would see in all the sci-fi works? Why go out of your way to cover the thing in gear that people won't understand?
OP is obviously. American. We've been to the moon. You can literally see man made objects on the surface of the moon with a telescope. But hey, why bother looking when you can shitpost
>>769161573
Probably because it doesn't exist. If it did, you wouldn't ALL tell me to research it myself, one of you would be able to provide a source or two.
there's a documentary series up on youtube called Moon Machines. go watch all the episodes, they're very interesting.
>>769161623
>I'm just asking questions.
Bait 101. Gonna have to try harder.
>>769161733
In fact, NASA doesn't even exist! Those big buildings in florida are all holograms!
>>769161623
>write up a simple explanation for me
Just fucking google "moon lander" FFS - you'll have pages of information in about three seconds.
Do you also ask people to chew your food for you?
>>769157946
this fuckin guy gets it
yo you woke mother fuckers ever eat so many red pills you start pissing blood?
i dont know what they put in those fuckers but goddamn does it make your piss burn
anyways thanks for this dope ass thread
good to see so many of you bros not being led astray by the faggots in washington
ware cats like condoms
gorpgorpgorp
>>769161678
Normies don't truly desire knowledge. You could sell them literally anything and they'd believe you if it was beyond their comprehension. They're too lazy to look it up.
Hey bud guess what is really up in space, shit is it your nap time, yeah it is, get the fuck to it lol.
>>769159017
Because the moon is indoors you.... Double nigger!
>>769160887
ugh, to put something in space you have to overcome the earth gravity and if you need at least 30 times the weight in fuel hence the use of very big rocket and because other dozen different physic laws that probably you just snored at school , the payload has to reside inside the "top end of the rocket" , as the rocket goes up explosive charges divide the rocket in smaller and smaller parts ultimately exposing the payload in space. Is it basic enough or do i need to draw a picture?
>>769160887
> A random guy doesn't know the answer to literal rocket science.
> Hurr durr, i knew i was right.
Get lost in a burning building you fucking tool.
>>769161778
Not an argument.
>>769161803
That's a topic for another thread but maybe. I'll look into it.
>>769161829
You don't have 3 seconds to google it for me and everyone else? Why do I HAVE to do it? If it's so easy and you really want me to know the "truth," why not google it yourself? You're full of baloney and I think you know it.
>>769161961
I get all that, but it still doesn't explain how the lander doesn't rip apart on the way to the moon.
>>769162157
Now not only are you without an argument, you're being a total jerk. I think you'd better apologize.
>>769162369
>Why do I HAVE to do it?
>Why can't people do everything for me waaaaaaaah
Commie detected.
>>769162369
> You don't have 3 seconds to google it for me and everyone else? Why do I HAVE to do it? If it's so easy and you really want me to know the "truth," why not google it yourself? You're full of baloney and I think you know it.
Beacuse you're the one who's arguing against it.
Pussysauros rex.
>>769157946
>>769161829
The whole concept of going to the moon is jew propaganda. No one with any real intelligence believes that we went to the moon on a rocket.. Who would willing strap themselves ontop of a giant stick of dynamite basically? Any info about the moon lander is paramount to reading specs on the AT-AT walker.
>>769162369
>everyone else
Everyone else is reading this for themselves; you're the only one demanding that someone does your work for you. My best guess is that you're some lazy fucking high school punk that wants someone to write something that a teacher can't websearch.
Do your own research, you little bitch.
>>769162713
>>769162494
>inb4 "not an argument."
>>769162489
Don't call me a commie, commie. I'm just asking why you can't provide proof for your claims.
>>769162494
And you're arguing against me. It takes two to tango.
>>769162713
You said it, you must have done your own research to come to your conclusion and if you can't even very quickly link SOMETHING to support your position, I think you must be full of crap. Sorry, Charlie.
>>769162873
It goes without saying at this point tbh.
>>769162560
>No one with any real intelligence
Anyone that's taken a high-school science class can understand how it was done. It's basically Millennials that learned science from Facebook and reddit that seem to struggle with this.
>>769162889
>support your position
I'm not making claim against the moon landings and that puts the onus on mouth-breathers that have learned everything they know from memes.
>>769162998
>has been taught false science
>thinks others are stupid
Try again jew.
>>769157946
>one of the most heavily funded organizations on the planet would try to pass off a pots and pans robot as an actual robot
Not even trying to debunk the conspiracy, but come on now... I think they'd be a little more crafty than taping a few curtain rods together and hoping nobody would notice.
>>769163257
>false science
Where do you think your phone and your laptop came from, a fucking seance? Time to move back your cave, Fred Flintstone.
>>769162889
Burden of proof rests on claimant, since you claim we didn't go against the moon, and most of science says we did, it is up to you to prove your point.
Your move, plebbit
>>769157946
satellites power the internet you used to post this lmao.
>>769163252
Very convenient that you people never have to prove your counter-claims just because the other guy is claiming something first or some other unwritten bullshit rule you made up on the spot... very fucking convenient indeed. It's almost as if... you're wrong? Naaah...
>>769163370
>>769163437
>>769163512
Pointless trying to bring logic into a shit thread like this.
>>769163512
"We went to the moon" is a claim. Prove it.
>>769163437
>thinks phones and laptops are the same thing as rockets
Try flying a laptop to the moon....,
>>769163836
Did you not read any of my post? You go against the scientific mettle, so you have to prove your claim.
>>769164039
Again, very convenient. Everything you say is automatically true. How do I acquire such an ability?
>>769163949
Sigh...the same science that helped make spaceflight possible. Why is this so hard understand?
>>769158657
Gforces only effect based on the mass of the object, so
1 - less mass makes it less affected by gforces.
2 - your dick would also not be affected
Furthermore, this is the landing module, which was encased in the rocket housing upon launch from earth.
>>769163790
Ikr people are trying to say people went to "another planet"... Where in the bible does it say "god created the heavens and the earth and lots if other planets and galaxies" stop falling for jew science. Einstein was a puppet for the Zionist conspirators... How can you trust someone who admits to being a jew?
>>769164168
Man, it's almost like you have no proof at all, and are just strawmanning my argument. Pathetic.
>>769164172
Why is it so hard to understand that you have been lied to? Just because a scientist says something is so doesn't mean it is. Saying that because there are laptops so we must have gone to the moon is taking a huge leap of faith. Some Balltards will just never unlearn the propaganda...
>>769164516
You've literally made no argument. "G-google it kid" is not an argument. Here, let me try your version of argumenting: the moon landing was fake and I won't show any proof. That PROVES it. Checkmate, faggot. Give me my trophy.
>>769164168
Science is largely consensus-based, which means that the burden of proof is on the party that makes "extraordinary claims". This is a principle that has been widely accepted since the beginning of the Enlightenment, which you somehow seem to have overlooked.
>>769164640
>Balltards
OK, I'm out.
>>769164835
to be fair, there is a shit ton of information, so it would be like a long essay of how it all works. To start, they didnt fly the lander back to earth, they flew the orbiter back.
>>769157946
>flat earth matters
check your source faggot
https://spacecentre.co.uk/blog-post/know-moon-landing-really-happened/
/End thread
>>769164835
>still not providing proof of landings being faked
>not understanding burden of proof
>>769158477
>God
>People on /b/ are retarded
>God
>god
>>769157946
The foil absorbs radiation
>>769164914
Then all scientific claims may be lies because convincing the ill-informed masses that you're not lying isn't proof of fucking anything and you're retarded if you believe that it is. I'm going to do everything in my power to dismantle all science stands for and show people the TRUTH. Unless, of course, you can actually provide this mythical evidence to support your claim. It should be easy if most people agree on it.
>>769165281
>People went to moon
That is a claim, you have the burden of proof.
>>769157946
>i think, i found a bug! or...?
>>769165047
No one in this thread questioned, to my knowledge, how we got it back FROM the moon. The question was how we got it TOO the moon.
>>769165281
It seems to me that "burden of proof" is just something you say when you HAVE no proof. I see no proof that it wasn't faked.
>>769165385
And they all were laughing at me
Iām convinced that people who believe the earth is flat and the moon landings were fake are all just part of one big troll group. With all the evidence and studies that debunk those theories, thereās no way a person could reasonably believe them.
>>769161733
Are you under the impression that the lander in OPs pic related is the the whole thing that blasted off from earth?
If you look at my pic related, that's how they get thinks off earth. Once you have speed in space, drop the weight and float the lander to the moon.
Ffs dude, I know you've seen them drop the orange tanks into the ocean, I know you've seen the falcon heavy launch, I know you've seen pics of them doing shit on the space station.
Or maybe you're only 10 and this is why you're asking how things get in space.
>>769165604
>still not understanding burden of proof
>>769165651
I'm pretty sure at least 90% are just trolls. But you know damn well there's some that believe..
>>769165628
>It seems to me that "burden of proof" is just something you say when you HAVE no proof. I see no proof that it wasn't faked
>>769165651
Post the studies or I'm inclined to believe they do not exist.
>>769159518
Dumb.
>>769165639
funny thing is, when you use a phone wearing a tinfoil hat the radioation is cought inside the hat and it's actually worse for you because it's bouncing arround before exiting through the way smaller exit because you are wearing a tinfoil hat
>>769165665
I know about all that shit. What I want to know is, how does the lander not rip to shreds from the speed necessary to launch to space?
>>769165836
No, instead we won't post anything in order to troll you
>>769165963
Because some people are engineers, and they know how to do things. You've never known how to do anything, so it's alien to you.
>>769165974
Okay, I'm glad you admit you were just trolling. So we agree the landing was fake?
>>769157946
yes and everyone that works at nasa, all 20,000 employees have kept the secret for 50 years
>>769165713
You are literally thw most retarded /b/ro ive ever encountered. You are making a claim that human beings actually traveled to the moon in a tin can and all the proof you have is videos of lower quality than Kubricks other lower budget movie (2001). You sir have the burden of proof.
>>769165837
>>769166063
If they know how to do things and you know how they do things and I'm so alien to the idea, enlighten me. How do they do it?
>>769166128
>>769157946
good thing there are no breezes on the moon with no atmosphere, huh?
>>769158911
Look up the Van Allen belts. There's quite a lot of science involved.
>>769166081
pfff if you think only NASA was involved. contractor companies in all 48 continental states were involved in either designing or building the saturn/apollo hardware. easily over 100,000 people. plus the hundreds of thousands who watched the rockets launch with their own eyes.
>>769164835
/b/ is not your personal research team.
This isn't nudes or conspiracy or something that I might have something you've never come across. When it comes to something like the moon landing, we all have access to the same published information, including you. I don't know what secrets you think some anon has, but I'm willing to bet there's no oldfag NASA bastards lurking /b/ waiting to drop the info bomb.
What exactly are you confused about anyway? Orbital patterns? Structure? Materials? Thrust-weight ratios?
Again, sorry, were just going to Google the same shit you should be googling yourself. I'm a mech engineer who did a college project for NASA (electrical plugs for the moon. That dust fucks shit up) and I don't have these answers off the top of my head.
>>769166128
>rekt
>>769166169
No. :-)
>>769166081
Not all 20k employees know the truth. They are lied to jus>>769166128
t like you,
>>769160887
Go tell your wrangler you've been using the internet again.
>>769158254
samefag spotted gtfo you stupid stupid bitch
>>769165963
The exact same way you don't get your face ripped off while driving down the highway on a rainy day. You put it inside the launch vehicle.
>>769161949
kek
>>769166396
What, we would never...
seriously, watch this series. it's interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mucb4Ttt1oY&list=PLTu8nanTJo7GvulBxz9JT9JcXeXimM1Vr
>>769166331
Nice ad hominem. Wheres your proof of the original argument? Or has your pompous arrogance clouded your memory of the topic of this thread?
>>769166651
This
>>769157946
Become a rocket scientist and find out.
>>769166323
You guys have literally spent like 100x the energy required to prove me wrong, telling me to google it. You guys have nothing. I'm set on NOT googling it now. Obviously just a distraction and a waste of time. One of you guys will take the time to debate me. Here, take this fellow for example. He seems like a nice gent:
>>769166548
That makes no sense. Speed is speed, no matter where you are in the speed. We obviously just don't go fast enough in a car to get our faces ripped off but a spaceship is a whole different animal.
>>769166693
>Nice ad hominem. Wheres your proof of the original argument? Or has your pompous arrogance clouded your memory of the topic of this thread?
>pompous arrogance
>>769166274
Care to explain how a rational argument is bait?
>>769166936
"speed"? why speed?
>>769166936
>Americucks don't know the difference between speed and acceleration and what that implies regarding forces
>>769166962
>Nice ad hominem
>Browsing /b/
God you're retarded.
>>769167058
Nice ad hominem,
>>769159017
there is wind on the moon. you realize how fast it's moving through space? the wind is fast af
>>769166309
not to mention you can see the fucking apollo landing site via telescope
>>769166962
>Kek "cringe compilation" back to plebbit with you.
>>769166936
Shitloads of testing. Apollo 11 was #11 for a reason and and the first actual attempt to land on the moon. I recommend pic related if you want more info.
>>769167058
>>769167058
>God you're retarded
>browsing /b/
>believes we didn't land on the moon
>>769167055
I don't understand the question. Why not speed?
>>769167056
I know the difference. Speed is how fast you're able to go and acceleration is how fast you can get to that top speed. I used to play Mario Kart professionally, okay? Spaceships need more speed and acceleration than all the cars on my entire block combined to get to space otherwise we could all just drive to space.
>>769157946
>Having no concept of how space travel works
>Get educated faggot
>>769167298
>back to plebbit
Im tryin to shitpost mommmmmmmm
>>769157946
Stanley Kubrick admitted to taking the moonlanding https://youtu.be/ZWX_CffNa-I
>>769166936
Who.. who do you think drove the spaceship..
Also hehe, I'm samefag. Thanks for calling me a gent. Means a lot here /b/ro. But remember that whole theory of relativity? You're not going fast. The vehicle is going fast in relation to it's environment. You're sitting inside going the same speed as the air inside the vehicle, and therefore it's not windy inside.
The same people that are ITT who claim we never went to the moon (possible) are the same people that deny 9/11 was an inside job.
>Ball earth level arguments are so shit tier i cant even read without crying laughing
>>769167619
lol no he didn't
Just to make it clear and everyone can read.
no one was on the moon. no one.
>>769167661
Good thing it's a oblate spheroid and not a ball!
>>769167578
Awwe its trying to be funny.
>>769157946
Ha, you believe in the moon? What a retard.
>>769167641
>samefag
Haha, that's crazy.
>You're not going fast.
??? Then how the fuck do you catch up with the ship? How do you think speed works? The Flash isn't real, bro. It doesn't work like that.
>>769167790
Posted the link
>>769167916
>Awwe its trying to be funny
>>769167790
Old news bruh
>>769168019
Based
>>769168019
I know, right?
>>769157946
Moon has no wind so no breeze, thus will survive
>>769157946
Ain't no moon landing because ain't no moon because ain't no globe earth
you know the soviets built a moon rocket too?
>>769158911
>thinks solar wind is an actual wind
>>769167535
Look i think the whole thing you're missing is the foil lander was tucked away like a suitcase in your car until it was time to land. Then they got inside that, ejected it, and carefully landed, leaving enough fuel to get back off the moon.
There's no atmosphere in space or the moon, therefore no weather. The only thing you need to worry about out there is the direct radiation of the sun, and also the well below freezing temperatures.
This structure only needed to hold itself together, support the weight of 3 men, and withstand the jerk of landing/taking off. And fend off the sun radiation.
>>769167619
Watch stanley kubrick's confession /thread
>>769157946
I don't know but if they didn't go to the moon then how did they place bigass mirrors with which you can point a laser and watch it as the mirror reflects it back
that is kind of proof right?
>>769168397
It wouldn't need to be a big jerk either since no atmosphere, low gravity, and low overall build weight. People don't understand that. Also, for flat eat there, I live in the most backwards state in the United States, Alabama, and we have a fucking rocket center where you can go and look at spacecraft. If our inbredass redneckians can know earth isn't flat, how the fuck can others believe the planet is flat?
>>769157946
What is the point of these threads. This is some weak-sauce misinformation, you'd be lucky to sway 15 year olds.
>>769168446
Couldn't they just shoot reflectors up there?
>>769160015
bait 100000
>>769168417
I'll refer you to this
>>769158051
IMPLYING that you donāt deal with any wind resistance while exiting and re-entering EARTh.
>>769168397
I fail to understand how any of this negates the force of such high levels of speed. I drive real slow with my suitcase, I assure you, or else it'd spill all over. At space-level speeds? It'd probably fucking burn up. Also, the heat of the sun AND the freezing temperature? How can there be both?
>>769168026
Dude you're just sitting still while driving. You're literally not moving. The vehicle is moving and carrying you with it.
Yes, you are moving in relation to the outside environment, but you don't have any contact with the outside envronment, and you don't need to do any work. Only the vehicle does. Only the vehicle needs to supply thrust and withstand the sun/rain/atmosphere heat/etc.
>>769157946
https://youtu.be/ZWX_CffNa-I
>definitively ends conversation
>>769168872
>implying they did either of those things in the LEM and not the CM
>>769168968
speed doesn't have a force you high school dropout
f=ma
>>769168968
Lol godamn you you troll. I've been b8'd
>>769169046
well you show that to people and it's going to end their discussion with YOU, for sure
prime question:
what is wind?
>>769169132
I firmly believe not one has watched it
>>769169171
watched WHAT?
>>769168968
The sun is so cold it burns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfMO0E-AUK4
>>769169253
https://youtu.be/ZWX_CffNa-I stanley kubrick confessing to faking original moonlanding
>>769169132
>>769169171
Which part does that video show?
The part where he claims to be Stanley?
Or the part where he's being given lines from the guy filming?
>>769169323
i don't see any such video
>>769169046
>88 page NDA that only lasts for 15 years for the supposed biggest scientific cover-up in history
>>769169389
It's really stanley kubrick
>>769159257
chad daddy
>>769169323
Bullshit that's Daisy's destruction. I'd recognize that tail sequence anywhere
>>769169516
and I'm prince william
>>769169015
If I'm not going anywhere, how do I move with the car!? How do I magically appear elsewhere when I get out!? Are you mental!? Genuinely at a loss right now.
>>769169097
How does speed move things without using force!? I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS!
>>769169107
Not b8 and not an argument.
>>769169619
You married an ugo half breed with fucked up feet
>>769169516
Dude...
There's literally video of that same guy being fed lines by the guy filming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niEcNiU_2jA
>>769169632
>he thinks speed is even a scientific term
>>769169702
That was Harry, you dense cunt. William married top-notch English totty Kate Middleton
>>769157946
Who cares if they went to the moon, it's just a huge boondoggle. You won't find anything in outer space. They should have pumped those millions of dollars in fixing this world instead of looking for shit out there
>>769169797
Oh, excuse me, mister scientist. What would YOU call the force that moves you when you put one foot in front of the other.
>>769169758
New fags dont know how to have fun at others expense
>>769169818
Either way at the end of the day your still British
Wieso diskutiert man mit Hunden mit gefƤhrlichem Halbwissen? Einer hat eben behauptet es gƤbe Wind auf dem Mond. Der hat nichtmal ne AthmosphƤre. Ich mƶchte sterben.
>>769170012
Doubt.
>>769170118
Speak George Washington's English or fuck outta here, Frenchie.
>>769170071
Thanks
>>769168785
I don't think so, doing that would be painfully dificult. Landing on the moon with a crew to carefully placing them looks easier.
To be honest I have never seem those mirrors myself, but even if they could "shoot them up there" you would need to make them able to resis the fall or develop a machinery capable of automatically landing safely. If they where to do that which (I don't even know if it is possible I am not an engineer or anything related) I think it would be painfully obvious since they would not be just big mirror panels.
I know this is b8 btw
>>769169993
>he thinks "speed" is some sort of external force
>>769169797
speed is defined as distance over time
>>769170407
>>769170430
You've gotta be fucking with me. Speed. You know, SPEED. Zoom zoom, the thing that makes you go fast.
>>769169632
It's the theory of relativity.
Einstein postulated this: if a man sitting on a train passes a man sitting on a bench, who is moving faster? Neither, they're both sitting still. The train is moving, giving one a relative speed difference.
Think about it. Your stomach inside you goes wherever you go. It can't move. It just sits. You move.
The Earth is spinning along at like 700k mph. But we're all spinning with it, so theres no relative difference. So even if you think you're just sitting still, you're still getting thrust around through space at insane speeds.
I'm not saying you don't change geographic location, I'm saying if you're stuck in a bubble (like a car) that's moving, you won't care because everything in the bubble is moving the same speed as you. We can do things to other interbubble objects the same as if we're sitting at home.
Just like the earth. We're all stuck in this moving bubble. But we're all going the same place at the same speed so we don't notice that anything's moving at all.
>>769170595
it was just my opinion
take it as it is
I am a molecular biologist, I don't know anything about space engineering
>>769170823
>>769171009
yeah, that was the point of my response
also elon musk is a hack
there, thread dereailed
>>769170802
I can't. I can't anymore. This is so stupid. I am shifting side to side right now and you're telling me my stomach is just leaving my body behind and magically is invisible while it leaves and then it magically teleports back and I'm totally okay without a stomach up until it catches up with me. You're telling me the Earth is moving and we're moving with it but we're not moving with it because theories. Come on. I'm out if you can't take this seriously.
>>769171089
I'm Elon Musk.
>>769167660
This. Psy ops disinfo Israel IDF bots controlling the world
>>769169632
This faggot is trolling the lot of you so hard and you retards keep replying to him trying to catch him redhanded but you can't because he doesn't know shit, he doesn't want to know shit, he isn't looking for a compromise, he just wants you to waste your fucking time explaining shit he doesn't care about.
Anon is playing you like a game and you're falling for it like a buncha idiots.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-nasa-tapes/moon-landing-tapes-got-erased-nasa-admits-idUSTRE56F5MK20090716
OP should get a boat and sail for the edge
>>769171743
This. The moon landing was most likely real but they faked footage as an insurance policy
>>769171799
Already did.
See.
>>769171160
What you just said had basically no bearing on anything that was said in the previous post and was nothing but the ramblings of a moron. try to get a base understand of the most basic of scientific principles before attempting to argue against them.
>>769171743
You caught me. Good game, dude.
>>769171774
>>769171917
Well give me an idea of basic scientific pricipals, don't just call me a moron. I bet you can't, that's why you resort to namecalling.
>>769157946
die normalfag
>>769170693
>"Speed" is the thing that makes you go fast, rather than the source of propulsion
>>769162889
You made the initial claim. Burden of proof is on you, you fucking commie.
>>769170360
Those are chips faggot
>>769160695
Now I'm wondering if Iron Felix made it home
>>769172350
>source of propulsion
That's called an engine. An engine isn't speed, you goof, it PROVIDES the speed force necessary for something to go fast.
>>769172456
Show me in the rulebook where burden of proof is some end all be all argument. Let me give you some help: it's not an argument. The order of claim making doesn't fucking matter. Are you 5 years old? If you make a claim, you provide the damn proof whether you said it first, second, third or whatever the fuck number in line you were. You have yet to prove me wrong and that strongly suggests to me that I'm right.
>>769172149
Ok, sorry, let me define "moving" in this context:
Propelling oneself in a direction.
Sorry, when I said your stomach can't move, I'm not saying it's permanently stationary, I literally meant it can't move itself. You move it inside your bubble being, and everything else with it. Muscles can move themselves and that's what propels everything along. It's all moving in the same bubble and therefore it's all undistubed.
The guy sitting on a train is just sitting still and not moving. The train wheels are contacting the ground and moving everything along as they rotate.
The moon lander isn't moving during take off. It's just sitting protected in the spaceships trunk until they reach the moon.
>>769173129
>let me redefine "moving"
Stopped reading right there. You can't just redefine shit to better support your claim.
>>769159017
...how is there wind without air? Like did you attend an educational institution at any point in your life?
>>769173034
>An engine isn't speed, you goof, it PROVIDES the speed force necessary for something to go fast.
>You know, SPEED. Zoom zoom, the thing that makes you go fast.
I'm getting conflicting answers from you anon
>>769171160
You really need to go retake middle school science.
>>769173344
There is no such thing as a finite amount of water as it falls from the sky
>>769173267
How do those conflict with each other? An engine provides speed which provides the fast, it's not hard or contradictory.
>>769173344
Probably. English was my strongest subject. I would tend to gossip with the other girls during science but I still know the basics like how speed or solid objects work. What you've got is ultimately not an argument.
>>769173766
>is a woman all arguements now invalid
>>769173766
Come back when we are discussing how to get stains out of our slacks
>>769173856
>>769173930
These posts are highly problematic and, more importantly, NOT ARGUMENTS.
>>769165465
Scientific theories are peer reviewed before they are accepted. The ones to review them are fellow scientists and professionals on the matter.
>>769157946
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPA5yBceeR0
>>769174070
Sounds like corruption to me .How would it sound, if business deals were reviewed by fellow capitalists and professionals?
In a criminal case, you cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that we landed on the moon.
So legally, we never landed on the moon.
>>769173982
It's ok sweety the men are talking about science maybe go bake something
>>769174070
You see no problem with this? You've got only a handful of people who may have bullshitted their way through scientist college, smoked some weed, saw the same hallucination and called it scientific fact or they still may just be straight up lying. The fact that they're all scientists or professionals doesn't automatically make their claims any more valid than anyone else.
>>769174376
I'll fucking bake your cock, fucker.
>>769174402
>weed
>hallucination
Lel got me on that one
>>769174458
Sounds sexy but wait till the adults are done talking honey
>>769157946