Retard roll call, drop your solution and I'll let you know if you're retarded or not
Its 1
>>769147289
2
>>769147289
1 is correct.
>>769147345
for those that say 9, implied mult/div happens before explicit.
>>769147229
Depends on the way you do the division and multiplication.
Brakets first is 3, same both ways. then if you do 6 / 2 * 3 doing the divide first it's 9. doing the multiplication first it's 1.
Conventionally, it's left to right.
>people are still arguing about this
>not realising the simple answer
>litteraly just 9
>>769147526
6/2(1+2)
6/2(3)
3(3)
9
I'm incorrect? It could be rewritten as 6/2x3
one
>>769147526
1
PEMAS
fuck off aunty carol, this isn't Facebook...
i got .33
>>769147773
>>769147679
how the fuck are you retards this dumb? it's obviously 1.
>>769147786
After zucc buys 4chan it will be
>>769147786
This isn't facebook? Damn, I must have typed the website wrong...
1.5
>>769147836
What the fuck I got 7
>>769147229
check em
3.2416
3.14.16
>>769147639
You are incorrect. When the multiplication in is implied(numeral is adjacent to parenthesis, there is no multiplication symbol), it will happen before any explicit function (when the operand is present), in this case the division.
Any rewriting of the equation like changing the 6/2 or adding the multiplication sign alters the function.
>>769147229
6/2(1+2)=x
1=x/(6/2(1+2))
6=x/(2(1+2))
12=x/(1+2)
12=x/3
36=x
the answer is 36
>>769148482
prove me wrong
It’s a poorly written problem...
6 / (2(1+2))
Or
(6/2)(1+2)
Should be used unambiguously.
>>769148589
Sorry that it's too hard for you to understand basic arithmetic notation.
>>769148224
>>769147229
6/2(1+2)
= 6/2*3
= 3*3
= 9
Its 7 you retarded fucks.
6÷2(1+2)
6÷2+4
3+4
7
Go back to school you fuckin morons!
>>769148844
You try arguing syntax with a doctorate professor.
When dealing with something a little more complicated, very clear notation is required.
The fact that there is argument about the answer is evidence enough.
This is nothing more than an attempt to show superior knowledge. Akin to criticizing someone’s grammar.
>>769149225
I'd say you're retarded but I'm not sure if b8
>>769148482
b = (1+2)
6/2*b = x
1 = x/(6/2*b)
1 = 2x/6b
6b = 2x
3b = x
3*(1+2) = x
x = 9
It's 1, really this is middle school math, step it up /b/
>>769147425
>>769147765
>>769147824
>>769147931
>baiting, samefagging and shitposting this hard
a new low
6 ÷ 2 ( 1 + 2 )
62 ÷ 22 ( 1 + 2 )2
36 ÷ 4 ( 1 + 4 )
36 ÷ 4 ( 5 )
9(5)
√45
√9√5
3√5
>>769149318
Its not a bait but if you think i'm wrong, explain why?
>>769149602
>not understanding point of thread
>>769149756
1 + 2 = 3
>>769149809
It's to pit the retards against each other
>>769149613
it can also be
36 ÷ 4 (5)
36 ÷ 20
√36/20
6/√20
6/4√5
1.5√5
>>769149878
>It's to pit the retards against each other
>>769148589
not ambiguous because brackets are factored:
2(1+2) = (2*1) + (2*2)
therefore
6/6 = 1
>>769149225
lol you forgot to factor the brackets into 2*1 and 2*2
1
>>769147229
6 / 2 (1 + 2)
> Start
6 / 2 * (1 + 2)
> Between the 2 and the (1 + 2) we add a multiplication operation.
6 / 2 * (3)
> First solve parenthesis
3 * 3
> First solve 6/2 because divisions and multiplications are the same class of operation and are solved left to right
9
> solved
>>769149456
>>769149602
>>769150367
>>769150768
>>769147229
im trying to find the cure for cancer but i need to know the answer to this question first
>>769149602
>opens thread without reading OP
>probably can't read
>>769150367
>>769149456
>>769147836
>>769147773
>>769147679
>>769147526
>>769147289
>1
Literally type 6/2(1+2) into google to get 9 morons.
>>769151198
/ is not the same as ÷ you autist
>>769150800
Nope. The implied multiplication between 2 and (2+1) has higher precedence than the explicit division.
>>769150823
>>769150933
>>769151048
shitposts
>>769151331
It literally is.
>>769151366
Nope
>>769151331
>>769151366
>>769151331
You're probably thinking of %, which is not the same.
>>769151198
>6/2(1+2)
lol google programming assumes there is a bracket around the 6/2 when clearly there is not
Don't tangled. The answer is 9, using the operation law of primary school
>>769151420
>shitposts
>>769150800
>divisions and multiplications are the same class of operation
Found your error. ÷ and × are the same class of operation. Multiplication indicated via adjacency is not in the same operator class. You should have learned this in grade school. Had OP used the equation 6÷2×(2+1) your answer would have been correct.
>>769151622
>>769147229
Rule 1: First perform any calculations inside parentheses.
Rule 2: Next perform all multiplications and divisions, working from left to right.
Rule 3: Lastly, perform all additions and subtractions, working from left to right.
>>769151894
burn
>>769147229
The answer is clearly purple, because aliens don't wear hats.
>>769147425
>Autistic Faggot.
Order of operations
>>769149225
>1+2=4
>>769151619
Yes, I use / instead while solving stuff.
Is it normal or this gon fuck me up in higher classes on uni?
>>769151892
Point to me where this rule is written, it has never been a thing. At best you can point to the rule that everything left of a ÷ has to be divided by everything after it, but this hasn't been a rule since 1917. Unless you're ~105 years old you have no excuse.
>>769152020
You can't just distribute whatever you want to, there's an order of operations. If you really want to distribute, you'd have to consider that your 'b' value is 6/2.
>>769149225
>6÷(2+4)
>>769152059
Yeah, order of operations. Get smart tardfag
>>769152079
GOOGLE CAN SUCK MY DUCK
>>769152242
ok so P in the order of operations can only be applicable to what is inside the parenthesis then?
>>769152454
Your downy dick?
Not sure if bait or op is genuinely mentally challenged
>>769147229
ok so the answer seems to be wither 1 or 9
so if we just take the average of the two numbers
>1+9=10
>10/2=5
the answer turns out to be 5
>>769152585
It's bait, but at least I know the answer is 9.
>>769152615
Based
>>769152615
pure genius
1+2=3
6÷2=3
3×3=9
9
>>769152678
Good bait
>>769152803
thanks
>>769147229
6/2(1+2)
6/2+4
3+4
7
6 ÷ 2(1+2) = 9
6
-------
2(1+2) = 1
PEMDAS
6 /2(1+2)
6/2(3)
6/6
1
>>769152913
>6/2(1+2)
>6/(2+4)
>6/6
>1
6/2(1+2)
6/2 x 3
3 x 3
9
>reatord
>>769147229
Answer is 9. Proven with sources already. Please see my essay. Link in pic.
>>769153026
Its actually P E MD AS
Multiplication and division have the same value, as well as addition and subtraction.
So 6/2(3) is the same as 6/2*3
6/2*3 is read left to right because they all have the same value.
>>769152615
now everyone can be happy
>the problem comes from the fact that you're using elementary school style division
if you were to write it out fractional form instead of using the retarded divison symbol it would be more clear as to what is multiplied and what is divided
in this case it becomes unclear weather we are multiplying the 3 by (1+2), or diving 3 by (1+2)
>>769153941
Exactly. I'm so fucking confused. I get the 9 answer but that's because it's not one over like most of us were taught in middle school up, the division symbol is misleading
i am a harvard graduate
>>769147229
6/2(1+2) =
3(1+2)=
3+6 =
complete the root
3x^2 +6x + 9 =
unfactorable
Quadratic equation:
a = 3, b = 6, c= 9
-6+-sqrt(6)^2-(4(3)(9) / 2(3) =
-6+- sqrt (-108) / 6 =
sqrt 6 i or -2 sqrt 6i
>>769155060
Seems like you could've spent that money better elsewhere
The thread
>>769153000
Trips don't lie
9
>>769147577
Conventionally you're wrong.
I'll just leave this here.
>>769147229
its 9
>>769156120
Conventionally, there's a fucking "or" in the god damn image you posted.
>>769155060
You clearly majored in women’s studies
