So how did WTC7 collapse when it didn't recieve any structural damage in the initial attack?
>>768770768
its because 9/11 was an inside job and was a controlled demo
>>768770768
Because 9/11 was just done to give an excuse to invade the middle east.
>>768770768
Because it burned for about 10 hours beforehand.
>>768770836
no it wasn't
>>768770887
No, 9/11 was the excuse for the invasion, but it was just a convenient starting point for GWB to get revenge for his daddy
>>768770993
I know, I'm baiting
>>768771094
Prove me wrong then faggot skyscrapers dont free fall like that unless they have help do more research you fucking sheep
>>768770768
because chemtrail spraying planes cause autism on our flat earth
>>768771271
tin foil hat on too tight?
>>768771271
Damn, someone figured it out
>>768771191
Nope, the burden of proof's on you, bud. They didn't free-fall, they pancaked
>>768771355
KEK what building you know that high ''pancakes'' go look at other buildings that were that big they never ever fell like that and had even more damage done to them than fake planes that didnt even hit the tower
>>768771516
It's time to stop posting
>>768770768
fire. it burned for 8 hours.
Its also received structural damage from the collapse of WTC 1
>>768770768
>So how did WTC7 collapse when it didn't recieve any structural damage in the initial attack?
Special flying carpet magic.
>>768771589
>fire. it burned for 8 hours.
My God, you retard, NO STEEL STRUCTURED SKYSCRAPER HAS EVER SUCCUMBED TO FIRE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.
>>768770768
They demolished it soon after 9/11 because structural integrity was lost or something. They weren't covering up anything in 7. And the reason WTC7 looks like a controlled demolition, is because it was.
>>768771589
shhh... you'll scare them
(I've posted pictures showing the catastrophic damage done to WTC7 from the falling debris - I think you know where I'm going with this)
>>768771641
now they have
Jet fuel dumb ass
>>768771642
Do you have any idea how long it takes to set up a controlled demolition on a buolding that size? Especially one that's on fire?
(and if you say the charges were already put in the building when it was constructed then fuck right off)
>>768771692
You've just gotta be kidding. Watch the video of WTC7 collapsing. IT'S A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
>>768771887
No, it really wasn't. Step away from the confirmation bias and do some proper research
>>768771575
deff gonna listen to a beta faggot go kys
>>768772456
ad hominem
>>768770768
>muh wtc7
>being informed over and over again for 17 years about how it was hit by a massive chunk of wtc1
>ignores all answers and keeps repeating the same fallacy over and over again for 17 years
>>768771516
>look at other buildings that were that big
>tallest buildings ever built at the time
so what buildings of that size have collapsed before? and how come we haven't heard of them? how many buildings of that size have been hit by a boeing 767?
>>768771191
>free fall
that's a lie. time the falling of the buildings and the falling of debris. there was no "free fall" you fucking liar.
>>768770768
Allegedly the structural integrity of the building was already weak so when the towers collapsed Tremors from the buildings falling helped indicate Building 7s collapse. However This is 4chan so what I said is practically the official narrative however It could of been an inside job and there was bombs in it all along!
WTC 7, just like WTC 1 and 2, had multiple levels off limits for "maintenance" during a few weeks before the collapses of all three.
the other towers did not receive any maintenance.
WTC 7 is the only building ever over 5 floors, to collapse on itself. There are multiple accounts of older, as tall buildings, getting completely submerged in fire, but never collapsing, leaving a metal frame only.
Also the fact that a wide building, collapsed so perfectly evenly distributed, the odds of that happening to any building unintentionally is astronomical.
So you have a building, designed to withstand a massive fire, collapse in the most unlikely way possible, from fire, without ever being hit.
Yeah...
>>768770768
the maintenance crew (mossad) fixed the elevators
>>768770887
Where more money was spent invading and spending decades there than any oil gains would be possibly worth?
>>768771191
Because we have such a huge sample set to refer to.
>>768770768
I'm not sure who is more retarded, 9/11 conspiracists, flat earthers or "man made" global warming nuts.
>>768773629
>9/11 conspiracists,
Did you know the CIA came up with the term "conspiracy theorist" after the JFK turkey shoot?
Consider the evidence. Watch the videos of molten metal being ejected from below the collapsing tower floors. No amount of jet fuel is going to "soften" structural steel. The official story is a fucking joke.
>>768773323
>a few weeks
1. it takes months to rig a normal sized building with explosives.
2. you also have to cut through numerous load bearing structures.
3. every building is different and have different breaking points
4. the whole point of a controlled demolition is to avoid damaging the surrounding area and buildings
5. the wtc collapse damaged every surrounding building as well as a major part of manhattan
6. you're a retard that have wasted 17 years of your life on bullshit without ever discovering that it's bullshit
>>768770768
>>768773629
The (((man made))) climate change bunch are the most delusional, there's literally zero evidence of this being the case but they gobble it down none the less.
>>768773629
That would be the warmists
>>768771094
ive been sent to jail for making dinner
ive been sent to jail for missing a shower that morning
ive been sent to jail for being a nigger
ive been sent to jail for sending me an email
yet this person is sitting here and saying jokingly or otherwise that this was anything other then a controlled demolition and NOT going on a blacklist for it?
fuck you world
i will murder you
>>768770768
>Who still believes terrorists were responsible for 9/11?
> How did WTC7 collapse when it didn't receive any structural damage?
>>768773629
It’s an observed property of CO2, methane and various refrigerants that they trap sunlight when they are suspended in an atmosphere. Light has a warming effect. It’s just fucking logic. We’ve had slow shifts in climate in Earth’s history, but we’ve already observed a change of almost 1.5 degrees of global temperature since we started releasing all those gases into the atmosphere. That might seem like a long time in human terms, but that’s a huge shock in geological terms. We’d see an even more drastic change if the oceans didn’t absorb some of that CO2, but that has turned the ocean steadily more acidic at a rapid pace, which fucking nukes coral reefs, and has a negative effect on other ocean life as well.
Tl;dr: we have a very heavy hand in the current climate change predicament.
>>768770768
Jet fuel
>>768774469
>yfw someone explains it to you
>>768770768
>>768770768
It was the weight of this question
>>768771763
Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough
>>768773768
1. No. It takes days. It takes months if you want to clear the building, strip the building etc which is what you do during a normal demolition.
2. That is correct, yes.
3. No shit Sherlock?
4. A controlled demolition would include the building of defensive walls around the building, to stop the debris from going everywhere. The damage caused by the WTC7 collapse was incredibly small, Pretty much no structural damage to any building. Windows got blown out and lots of superficial damages sure, but for a building that "uncontrollably" collapsed, very little was damaged. Any other building in history of similar sizes, smaller or larger, that has collapsed, have caused hundred times more damage around, because those buildings all tipped over.
5. Shouldn't 4 and 5 be under the same numder?
6. Great argument! Do you believe Earth is flat too?
>>768773591
Doesn't matter. Taxpayers fund the wars
>>768771641
>, NO STEEL STRUCTURED SKYSCRAPER HAS EVER SUCCUMBED TO FIRE IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD.
except WTC 1 & WTC 2.
>>768774519
There's no correlation whatsoever between CO2 and temperature historically. Other factors have a much greater impact.
>>768774950
>except WTC 1 & WTC 2.
Yes, well, the shaped charges on all support columns certainly helped. Odd that the steel was recycled offshore before it could be examined. That was forensic evidence.
>>768771887
>. IT'S A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
...said the basement-dwelling NEET that's never held a hammer in his life.
>>768774519
One Volcanic eruption causes 200 billion tons of CO2 to be released in the atmosphere. The global C02 output yearly from humans are around 24 billion tons. You think volcanic eruptions just started happening? Nope. It's literally the earth being the earth.
>>768771887
And what did they use anon? Did they use special force grade (((silent))) explosives.
