Shadman appreciation thread
let's talk about this extremely talented porn artist
You're not fooling anyone Shadzy.
Get back to making loli porn.
>>768716728
>He thinks smoking is edgy
>he draws childporn and tried to fuck his sister
no
I want to see him complete the ltcorbis set.
>>768717033
sounds awesome to me
>>768717033
Tried to fuck his sister?
>>768717127
Basically what we all want to do
>>768717208
lol
I've yet to really see one of his that I actively disliked. I like his art style for drawn porn.
>>768717033
You can't draw child porn. If it's not porn that involves children then it's not child porn. Drawings of children aren't children.
He should do something on lil tay
>>768717127
Nah, his sister found his hentai stash and ostracized him
>>768717283
Photos of children aren't children either. That doesn't make it ok.
>>768717089
I want more nun x hijabi. I thought I was alone in that fetish
>>768717416
No you're not getting it. Child porn is porn if actual children. If there's no actual child involved it's not could porn.
>>768717416
Legally it does (in the USA)
>>768717416
The reason child porn is illegal is because it requires the exploitation of minors in order to produce it. This does not apply to drawn porn
>tfw you will never have horny fangirls wanting to have sex with you
>>768717416
No, but you need an actual child to take the photo.
That's not the case with a drawing.
>>768717629
The reason gore is illegal is because it requires the gruesome deaths of people in order to produce it. Oh wait, gore is completely legal. Laws make no sense.
>>768717385
>only listening to shads side of the story
>>768717742
what, killing people isnt legal
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tees/7676738.stm
2008
ITT: retards that don't know drawn childporn is illegal
>>768717869
>bbc
your country bans fucking knives
your argument is invalid
>>768717089
man, she's too smart to leak nudes
but she's probably smart enough to publish them on purpose
what a conundrum
>>768716728
met him, chill dude, lets his edgy internet tool of a persona bleed into his real life too much
>>768717869
"Many of the images were so realistic they were considered by a jury to be indistinguishable from photographs."
No shit, these images are clearly different though
>>768717869
retards that dont know thats a small inbred island the world has passed by
>>768717869
"ITT: retard tries really hard to look smart but can't tell the difference between cartoon and almost realistic generated cp.
"Many of the images were so realistic they were considered by a jury to be indistinguishable from photographs."
>>768717869
>drawn childporn is illegal
In Britain, where you can't fucking buy cutlery without a photo ID.
But you can rape minors much as you like if you're muslim.
>>768717981
>your country bans fucking knives
[citation needed]
>shartman
>>768718187
Its like you've never interacted with the general public
>>768718221
https://www.gov.uk/buying-carrying-knives
>The maximum penalty for an adult carrying a knife is 4 years in prison and an unlimited fine. You’ll get a prison sentence if you’re convicted of carrying a knife more than once.
>>768718271
The jury is literally made up of members of the public and even they could tell the difference.
>>768717283
So you can't draw a car accident because you draw it on purpose? Are you idiot?
>>768718297
how the fuck do they even make food? they eat everything raw?
>>768718416
thats why they're all vegan....
>>768718395
What the fuck are you on faggot?
>>768718221
>>768718367
Yeah just like shads content..........
>>768718297
Yeah carrying a big knife out in public is against the law, how is that banning knifes?
>>768718395
>Are you idiot?
Certainly looks like you are mate.
Child porn requires an ACTUAL HUMAN CHILD be used.
>>768718395
you're retarded lol, re read what this said
>>768718558
How is that banning knifes? You can't buy something that is also a weapon if you're under 18. GOOD
>>768718685
>butter knife
>>768718558
anyone who thinks that an age restriction is a ban is a fucking retard.
>>768718685
is it making people safer? 100% no. how many ways can i make something pointy to stab people if i really wanted to?
>>768718526
>it's not real children therefore it's not children at all
I didn't say drawn child porn should be banned I said that drawing children having sex is literally drawing child porn
>>768718685
>thats not true
>well it should be illegal!
nice consistency
>>768718840
thats understandable but it shouldn't be illegal because it's not impeding on others rights.
>>768718796
>is it making people safer? 100% no
But it actually is tho
>>768718850
>nice consistency
Not what was said m8y
>>768718840
>drawing children having sex is literally drawing child porn
Only if you're using actual children having sex as models to draw it.
>>768718942
but it actually isnt though, if somebody's crazy or unstable enough to want to stab people then they'll find a way retard, why do you think people are running through crowds with vans instead of shooting them.
>>768718678
>>768718669
Thanks I can read, I simply disagree
>>768719005
no it is, but it shouldn't be illegal
>>768718628
Yeah, you're generalizing the FUCK out of it when the ban includes selling fucking butter knives to anyone under 18, and also outlaws batons.
>>768718925
Well yes, that's what I just said, can't disgree with you here
>>768718942
>stabbings still happening in Britain
Gee, you would think criminals going on a murder spree would respect the ban making their weapon of choice illegal.
>>768719058
Yes that extreme case will still happen outside of that it helps stop stabbings.
Next you'll have an excuse as to why people should be able to carry guns around
>>768719121
a "butter knife" is still a knife retard
>>768719005
Is that even in the law or you're just making this up?
>>768719252
"non extreme stabbings" are you fucking dumb, also if its normal for stabbings in you're country doesn't that just further lead you to believe the regulations don't work
>>768718685
You could definitely stab somebody's eye out with a pen. Better ban selling pens to anyone under 18 to keep society safe, am I right?
>>768719301
It's fucking logic, mate. Drawings are cartoons. Children are humans. Cartoons are not human, so therefore it's impossible for a cartoon to be a child; making it impossible for cartoons to be involved in child porn.
>>768717869
>downloading anything ever
had it coming
>>768719401
What are you going on about?
If somebody goes to the store to buy a knife knowing they're buying it to stab somebody and they find out they can't buy one, what the fucks that gonna do. Nothing, he's just gonna go home, break a window, and stab somebody with a piece of glass. >>768719252
>>768719283
Butter knives can't be used to stab, and if not sharpened they cut like a chicken claw. Though yes, knives are knives, I would worry more if someone attacked me with a pointy plastic fork than with a steel butter knife
>>768719439
Yes you could but a knife is a sharper object thats built to cut things. We don't have guns. so lets not have the next thing down too.
Its kinda like how you're not allowed nukes but they stopped there and let you have guns, knifes etc
you're just made we have better regulations to stop death....and free healthcare
ITT: Dumb americans
>>768716728
weirdo or not he's built and sexy af
>>768719709
We elected a great President to make our already great country great again. We couldn't do that if we were dumb.
his art is really bland and most of his art has same face syndrome with just a hair and clothes swap
>>768719458
Well then is "child porn" a legal thing clearly defined?
Cause for me it's just porn in any form with children in it, nothing more specific, then if it goes to court it absolutely depends on how it looks, if it represents a real person etc, but there's no general rule
I get that it sounds naive but I don't think that general laws about this particular subject can be good
"dumb americans" fine man, but if you ask me, taking away weapons AND allowing tons of people with an inherently violent religion seems pretty stupid to me.
>>768719995
shut the fuck up we're arguing now
I prefer jlullaby, if only he didn't liked black cocks so much...
>>768720055
I don't know what religion you're talking about. Islam promotes peace among all people.
I'm more of an InCase fan.
>>768720077
ok apart from his splatoon and god of war art name some pieces that don't look like the same person he only draws males different
>>768720048
>is "child porn" a legal thing clearly defined?
Images or videos of a sexual nature involving CHILDREN.
Not drawings. Unless you live in fucking Bongistan and are white; the muslims get away with anything there.
>>768720149
Now you're absolutely just fucking trolling.
>>768720149
except when they enslaved people for hundreds of years and are literally still enslaving people
>>768720272
DRAWINGS ARE IMAGES
>>768720349
INVOLVING REAL CHILDREN WHO ARE OR WERE AT ONE POINT ACTUALLY ALIVE IN REALITY.
>>768717991
is he attractive? he seems to be from his pics but i really cant tell
>>768720349
Images of things that actually exist. Drawings don't exist and aren't real.
>>768720409
wtf lol, yep every single image every made was originally real, like pepe was real, transformers real, superman real.
I want to smash shadman apart from the cigarettes those are pretty fucking try hard
>>768720272
Idk, where I live they banned a game because one character who looked 20 was described in the lore as underage and wore revealing clothes, so maybe I'm not well placed to talk about what is and is not cp
>>768720409
he did draw lewd pictures of keemstars daughter whos like 8
anybody have shadman nudes plz leak
>>768720591
does it abuse children? if no then it's not according to the united states, if so, then it's cp
>>768720501
Clearly you're not seeing this is exactly the idiotic point I was arguing against.
>>768720633
>he did draw
Not child porn.
The actual child was never involved in its making.
>>768720775
ok fuck off it was an understandable mistake, sarcasm in the form of text can be difficult.
>>768720735
>if the kids aren't hurt it's ok
bitch a nude photo doesn't hurt but it's still porn
SHADMAN NUDES I NEED SHADICK
>>768720923
Fine, agreed
>>768721041
yes it does, theres psychological damage retard, takes two seconds on google to find that out. It also normalizes the shit.
>>768721239
>theres psychological damage
Yeah, all the Playboy centerfolds I've seen certainly seemed extremely psychologically damaged by the shoots they agreed to do in exchange for money.
>>768721236
thank you, now we're an Internet couple.
