Why do republicans have to ruin everything?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Why do republicans have to ruin everything?
Because they think the past is better than the present.
You really don't know? Money man. Ajit Pai IS the representative of telecom industry. He's not here to make things better for you. He's here to make them more money.
Dust off the guillotine.
>>768671303
I just don't get why half our country literally has such a 50 IQ. Even the term for themselves, conservative, is stupid. Change = progress, progress = improved quality of life. Progressivism is the key to the future but all these dumb hicks want to live in the past live neanderthals.
LMAO.
>>768672061
Change =/= progress.
swapping from a republic to a dictatorship would not be progressive change.
>>768672164
You need to break a few eggs to make a cake
>>768672061
Found the kike
>>768671348
Because the point of america is to take power from the government and give it to the people.
>>768672061
Throughout history, poverty is the normal condition of man. Advances which permit this norm to be exceeded — here and there, now and then — are the work of an extremely small minority, frequently despised, often condemned, and almost always opposed by all right-thinking people. Whenever this tiny minority is kept from creating, or (as sometimes happens) is driven out of a society, the people then slip back into abject poverty.
This is known as “bad luck.”
>>768671303
What do you mean? They're serving their corporate masters perfectly well.
>>768673323
The GOP keeps power, and tosses some to corporations for a fee
>>768673397
Is that why huge amounts of corporate CEO's have stepped down already?
How about the number of politicians not seeking re election?
He's been repeatedly attacking big pharma.
He's been attacking illegal immigration, which only helps corporations.
Coincidence?
>>768673273
You realize the Democratic party was conservative back then, right?
>>768671303
Ruin your socialism and quotas, yeah because it's natural order. Now go back to your closits and keep crying in fetal positions because your anointed one lost.
>>768674845
Right...
Back when?
>>768674845
Still democrats
>>768675158
>a pikture wit txt sow it must be true durrrrr
>>768675294
>2018
>Google search
>Is nearly impossible
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1924_Democratic_National_Convention
>>768671303
They believe everything should be earned. No free stuff.
>>768671303
>Why do republicans have to ruin everything?
Because they don't believe the simple moral axiom that it's wrong to deliberately harm people without justification.
>>768675516
Democratic party was the more conservative of the two at that time. Those are still right wing cucks in that photo.
>>768675158
> Back when?
Till about the late 50s when Republicans became the party that opposed civil rights and desegregation. That's why Strom Thurmond became a Republican, for example.
>>768675516
>2018
>Citing Wikipedia as a credible source
>>768675708
You're retarded, stop responding to me.
>>768673273
Because we're all the same people we were a hundred and fifty years ago
>>768671303
well that happen if you let patel run your white country, patel is not white patel have not make good countries ever he may enjoy your white people scholarship money but still, not white
>>768675822
I'm smarter than you are apparently, so.. there's that.
>>768675719
So you agree that Democrats were pro slavery and racists, thanks for playing.
Oh, I almost forgot, the democrats also created the the modern slave plantations for black votes known as the welfare state.
Looks to me like they're still racists.
>>768675904
No, you're quite literally retarded.
>>768671303
You butthurt?
>>768673678
sICK MS-Paint skills, dude.
>>768675822
Ah, back when men provided for their families and raised their children.
>>768676086
Yep...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPXTWJhnYM
>>768675954
Looks like you don't have an argument, friend.
>>768675747
thinking 4chan is more credible than wikipedia
>>768675911
>So you agree that Democrats were pro slavery and racists, thanks for playing.
Uh, yes. Many democrats switched to the republican party because the Democrats stopped being racist enough.
Racist old Democrats == racist new Republicans == bad
Derp.
Also, Margaret Sanger advocated birth control be available to the poor, but she never uttered that quote, or ever said anything about killing black people.
Thank you for calling.
>>768676237
You never provided a rebuttal to my arguments anon.
You made a claim without any information to back it up, you expect me to address your opinions?
No thanks.
Democrats are still racists in 2018, just like they always have been...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPXTWJhnYM
>>768676342
>because the Democrats stopped being racist enough.
Not according to the welfare state data, Democrats have kept blacks under their boot for a very long time.
>>768676342
>Republicans == bad
Who told you that, your 5th grade teacher? lol
>>768676428
>>768676330
>implying i believed anything you said
>implying i believe things on 4chan
>>768676428
Racist Democrats BTFO.
>>768671303
Ajit Pai was originally appointed by obama you dumb cunt nigger. Fuck off with your propaganda. The vast majority of republicans did NOT want the repeal of internet neutrality. The unanamous senate vote was by a democrat lead senate as well.
For some reason both paid office residing republicans and democrats let this repeal pass. The public doesn’t want it and you trying to blame everything you don’t like on republicans means you need to do more research before you open you gai boi little mouth. Now fuck off. The adults are talking
the internet is bad we should get rid of it completely
>>768676463
> Not according to the welfare state data,
You should really rethink your retarded interpretation of the data, history, and what it means to be under someone's boot.
>>768676502
> Who told you that, your 5th grade teacher? lol
Yours apparently never taught you how to read.
>>768676689
They're just mad that he came out and told the truth when he got appointed.
He said the first meeting they had was to give big corps free fast lanes, probably lobbied a bit and gave some kickbacks.
He told the truth and they resent him for it.
>>768676747
>You should really rethink your retarded interpretation of the data, history, and what it means to be under someone's boot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPXTWJhnYM
I'll take Based Larry Elder's word over some randy cock sucker on the internet ANY DAY of the week.
What he says is completely true and logical.
Kys dumb faggot.
>Yours apparently never taught you how to read.
How intelligent of you.
>>768673210
Freeing the slaves was called progressive, now look what happened
>>768675287
>hold every belief of the modern conservative party
>if they lived in present day they'd register as republicans
>BUT DEY WUZ DEMKRATS BACK DEN LMOA
>>768676663
"My own personal theory is that Joseph built the pyramids to store grain. Now all the archeologists think that they were made for the pharaohs' graves. But, you know, [something to store the grain] would have to be something awfully big, if you stop and think about it." --Ben Carson
>>768673323
Found the retard.
>>768677010
What, nigga can't have theories, you racist?
>>768677010
Democrats DID start the KKK.
Democrats ARE the party of slavery.
Democrats ARE the party of Jim Crow.
Democrats ARE the party of segregation.
Democrats DID oppose Civil Rights.
Democrats DID oppose voting rights.
![2xandf0fa9q01[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wlsJXmO.jpg "2xandf0fa9q01[1].jpg")
>>768672061
Yeah letting the niggers, spics and faggots out of quarantine, that's some real progress. That's how we improve our quality of life.
>>768675911
When Democrats were the party of Southern conservatives, yes they were a racist party.
Who's the party of Southern conservatives now?
>>768676906
>Larry Elder
Ah, the emperor of black scholars.
> How intelligent of you.
Nice save.
>>768677148
They weren't conservatives though.
Not by definition.
Am I late for the daily cry about Trump thread?
>>768677162
You're just mad he's right and you have no data to rebuke him.
Look at the facts, look at the numbers.
Their families have been torn apart since the welfare act.
>>768677148
Democrats started the KKK.
The left is losing the culture war and it's pretty damn fun to watch.
>>768675516
>John Davis lost because he denounced the KKK and wasn't conservative enough for the party
>said conservative "democrats" eventually switch parties because the democrats don't hate black people enough
>retards still label them "democrats" almost a hundred years later
>>768677235
Adding to this, your argument was that racist dems became repubs but the data shows that they just traded one type of slavery for another and sold it to blacks.
>>768677306
So the racists of then were Democrats and the racists of today are democrats.
Nice to know.
>>768677162
>>>768676906
>>Larry Elder
>> Ah, the emperor of black scholars.
He's full of shit anyway, emperor or not.
https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303575
>>768676689
You elected people that supported repealing net neutrality, "but not all of us Republicans support the repeal of net neutrality", then you shouldnt support the Republicans, because that's what their into idiot. How many voted against it in the Senate?
ITT: kids finding out politics is dumb, both parties are the same, and their ideologies are flawed
>>768677388
>He's full of shit anyway
How is he full of shit, show me the data that black families are better today than before the Welfare Act.
You won't because it doesn't exist.
>>768671303
are you talking the fact that republicans think it's OK for the USA to have slow, african-speed internet and be fine with upcharging us all for services and fast lanes? yeah i think that's horse shit too.
this is fucking AMERICA, everything here should be bigger, faster, and more powerful, but we're too busy getting cucked by huge corporations over here to progress at all when it comes to tech infrastructure, so yeah
>>768671303
No one likes Ajit Pai. Neither side. I would consider myself a liberal but there are people on that side I don't want to be associated with so I just go with conservative.
>>768677263
Democrat and Republican are party labels, not ideologies. Conservative political ideology started the KKK. Regardless of what label the conservatives chose back then, today they label themselves as Republicans.
>>768677451
No, repubs believe the market has a better chance at correcting itself than crony politicians who get lobbied by corporations.
>>768677133
Sure, and and then the Republicans took over as the racist party that racist Americans vote for, because they're racists who hate black people.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy
>>768677497
Wrong, conservative just means to conserve what is, they were democrats, they wanted to conserve slavery.
>>768677358
the racists of then were conservatives who called themselves democrats, and the racists of today are conservatives who call themselves republicans. if you weren't retarded you'd understand this simple concept.
>>768677510
wow yeah we know how well that works out, look where we're at - behind
and that's not just one single president or administration's fault...it's all of them combined
>>768677514
>Republicans took over as the racist party that racist Americans vote for,
The racist party is the party of welfare, it's killing our families both black and white.
Don't believe me?
Look at the fucking data, you sloppy retard.
>>768675719
The party that opposed what?
>>768677544
you're fucking retarded. i'm not bothering arguing with your dumbass shitposting.
>>768677551
DEMOCRATS TRYING TO CONSERVE WHAT IS = CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS = DEMOCRATS
>>768677510
>>768677180
>They weren't conservatives though.
>Not by definition.
Wait...wanting to sustain things like slavery, jim crow, segregation, Civil Rights, and voting rights weren't conservative positions?
>>768677600
Bringing up the 60s???
Gg
>>768677581
Look buddy, nobody is denying that lobbying is crony, but the way to go wasn't to let corps lobby for free fast lanes like they did.
>>768677625
>CONSERVATIVES = DEMOCRATS
YOU = RETARDED
>>768677661
Yes, they are is that sense. But modern conservatism has nothing to do with any of those and lefties like to conflate the two.
>>768677697
DEMOCRATS TRYING TO CONSERVE WHAT IS = CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS = DEMOCRATS
Look how man this little racist piece of shit is getting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPXTWJhnYM
Democrats DID start the KKK.
Democrats ARE the party of slavery.
Democrats ARE the party of Jim Crow.
Democrats ARE the party of segregation.
Democrats DID oppose Civil Rights.
Democrats DID oppose voting rights.
>>768677596
>The racist party is the party of welfare
Or the one sustained by racists and characterized by racism.
>>768677625
yes, that's the whole fucking point you mong. conservatives have always been racist, regardless of the label they've rallied under. back then they were racist conservatives under the democrat label. today they're racist conservatives under the republican label.
liberal democrats of today are not conservative democrats of the early 1900s, and comparing them simply because they both used the "democrat" label is false equivalence.
>>768677815
Are you retarded?
ITT: Racist conservative trolls, pretending they are not the party of racism, while fucking with a retarded lefty that doesn't get that they know they are the party of racism.
>>768677824
You're being retarded.
They were trying to conserve their democratic principles of THEN.
That's what conservative democrats were THEN
Conservatives of today aren't racists, hard line republicans are more racists than conservatives.
>>768677787
>conservatives call themselves democrats and do a bunch of terrible shit
>conservatives switch sides and now call themselves republicans
>liberals adopt the democratic label
>conservatives claim new liberal democrats are the ones who started all the terrible shit
>conservative shitposters on 4chan are too stupid to know their own ideology's history
>>768677742
> modern conservatism has nothing to do with any of those
Yes, nowadays it's all about fanatic religion, guns, and mass incarceration.
>>768677824
>liberal democrats of today are not conservative democrats of the early 1900s
You're right, they are the racists of today = welfare state.
>>768671303
Republicans are doing everything they can to turn the US into a third world country. They can't be trusted with power.
>>768677861
Ah, I see you found the picture of all the black Trump voters.
>>768677974
>hard line republicans are more racists than conservatives.
And Muslim terrorists aren't actually Muslims, right?
>>768677991
Wrong, Democrats that just wanted to keep slavery attached conservative to their title, because they wanted to conserve slavery. How is this hard for you to understand?
Modern Conservatism has nothing to do with slavery.
>>768677974
>their democratic principles
>oops they're actually conservative principles
>oops they're actually the same principles touted by the conservative republican party of today
>>768677868
And why is being racist bad? Especially if it's selectively racist. Fuck Muslims and Mexicans. Dirty sandniggers
>>768678059
You're just dumb anon.
>>768678109
You're dumb too.
>>768677868
This...
Look how man this little racist piece of shit is getting.
DEMOCRATS TRYING TO CONSERVE WHAT IS = CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS = DEMOCRATS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPXTWJhnYM
Democrats DID start the KKK.
Democrats ARE the party of slavery.
Democrats ARE the party of Jim Crow.
Democrats ARE the party of segregation.
Democrats DID oppose Civil Rights.
Democrats DID oppose voting rights.
>>768678110
>they wanted to conserve slavery
almost like they were... conservatives. you absolute moron. get it through your dumb fucking skull that democrat and republican are not political ideologies in and of themselves. the conservatives back then were the same conservatives of today regardless of the party label they used at the time. politics is not "democrats" vs "republicans", it's liberals vs conservatives. want to know an easy way to litmus test this? look at the popular party names of other countries as compared to their political ideologies.
>>768678283
Mad these*
>>768678330
>correcting the grammar on a low quality shitpost
>>768678306
No anon, conservative is an attachment not the title itself.
Conservative republican.
Conservative democrat.
Conservative etc
To preserve what is.
They were democrats then and they're democrats now.
>>768678395
I corrected my own, nothing wrong with that.
Also, you still cannot refute anything based Larry said in that video.
Blacks were always slaves to the democrats.
Prove him wrong.
>>768675911
This sort of stuff was why she was never going to win and why the dems should of run Bernie
>>768678566
Bernie is no different than Hillary, a complete liar.
>>768678541
nobody watched your shitpost video you idiot.
>blacks were slaves to democrats
you mean conservatives.
>>768677133
You're thinking of Dixicrats which got merged into the modern Republican party.
>>768678621
>nobody watched your shitpost video you idiot.
I bet some people did, maybe not an idiot such as yourself.
>you mean conservatives.
You keep slinging shit but cannot articulate anything, it's honestly sad.
>>768671303
>"WAAAHH! I LIKE PAYING 150 A MONTH FOR INTERNET AND HAVING NO ALTERNATIVES!!"
>>768678566
*should have run
The primaries were rigged, the Democrats committed voter fraud - it's proven repeatedly.
>>768675911
"People will believe whatever they read on the Internet" - Margaret Sanger
>>768678598
99% of dems are liars
Most of it can be traced back to Nixon and the "Southern Strategy", which set the GOP on the path to blatant racism and authoritarianism; when Reagan showed up, that just cemented all of the bullshit in place. The modern GOP is the logical endpoint of fifty years of Republican policy.
I have no great love for the Democrats, but what the Republicans have become is a fucking disgrace and a rebuttal of all the things that made them good.
Both parties are cucks when it comes to race. You fags are retarded.
>>768678736
Did you know Hillary channels Margaret?
She communes with her quite often, according to Bill.
>>768677666
>Till about the late 50s when Republicans became the party that opposed civil rights and desegregation.
Fuck your lying evil trips and your evil Democratic Party.
>>768678716
the whole fucking election was bought and paid for by bilderberg group to get nonwealthies infighting. occupy wallstreet made them freak the fuck out. not because of the protests, but because they saw what happens when nonwealthies collaborate and force a government to start asking uncomfortable questions.
>>768677742
>modern conservatism is about conserving different traditions than in the past, therefore Southern Democrats weren't true conservatives because they wanted to conserve different traditions than today.
yea ok bud
>>768678800
Look how mad these little racist piece of shit is getting.
DEMOCRATS TRYING TO CONSERVE WHAT IS = CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS = DEMOCRATS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPXTWJhnYM
Democrats DID start the KKK.
Democrats ARE the party of slavery.
Democrats ARE the party of Jim Crow.
Democrats ARE the party of segregation.
Democrats DID oppose Civil Rights.
Democrats DID oppose voting rights.
>>768678566
Well she wasn't going to win because she was a chronic liar, a murderer, traitor, jewish puppet, Soros' lapdog, mentally and physically ill, had constant seizures, and was best friends with several rapists.
>>768678911
then why aren't you a democrat?
>>768678736
>"People will believe whatever they read on the Internet" - Margaret Sanger
Or CNN
>>768678879
>>768678936
you mean how like trump's been making israel back the fuck off right now?
>>768678882
I was just pointing out that the term conservative derives from conserve, meaning to conserve what it is you want.
In their case, the democrats wanted to conserve slavery.
Modern democrats are also conservatives in the sense that they also want to conserve slavery, it's just a different kind of slavery.
The kind that blacks don't realize.
>>768678911
Somebody is confused about the use of verb tenses. Yes, the Democrats were hellaciously racist. But funnily enough, when they started shedding that aspect, most of the people involved... became Republican. Funny, that.
The Democratic and Republican parties from 40 years ago are not at all the same as they are now.
>>768678971
this post was brought to you by the bilderberg group.
>>768672164
I dunno what if the republic were corrupt and morally bankrupt and the dictator was a kind and benevolent person with fair laws and policies?
>>768678936
>chronic liar, a murderer, traitor, jewish puppet
>mentally and physically ill
>and was best friends with several rapists.
She had all that in common with Trump then
Another episode of contrarian leftist posts no sources and calls everyone racist.
How progressive.
>>768678952
I'm not a racists pile of dog shit like you.
>>768678936
But she sets the standard for political correctness that's super important.
>>768679014
>Yes, the Democrats were hellaciously racist.
Watch the fucking video you retard, Larry quite eloquently spells out how modern democrats keep blacks down through welfare.
Perpetual victimhood and poverty.
>>768679056
then why are you part of the party that's losing their shit over civil war monuments being torn down, and telling black people to shut up about police brutality?
i mean, thats pretty racist.
>>768679115
easy, tovarishch, you're not gonna dupe people with that kind of attitude.
>>768679159
Because we shouldn't just delete history you ignorant fool.
Are you OK with destroying any monuments to our founding fathers because they had slaves?
I'm not.
>>768678936
kek, I must have spammed that gif 1000's of time in the run up to the election, it was so satisfying to see her denied the presidency :^)
>>768678990
stay salty :)
>>768679056
>2018
>caring about racism
>>768678998
>democrats wanted to conserve slavery
>modern democrats are conservative
You're purposely and misleadingly conflating party labels with political ideologies.
>>768679382
>You're purposely and misleadingly conflating party labels with political ideologies.
No, that's what you ignorant fools are doing.
Democrats during slavery did want to conserve slavery.
Modern democrats do want to conserve the black plantation known as the welfare state.
>>768671303
cause those cunts think they're better than everyone else, as simple as that
>>768676222
Make sure you remind people this is before the parties switched sides. Those rpubs are the modern Democrats after the change. Wouldn't want to accidentally be dishonest now would you, anon?
>>768677133
Ok quick history lesson. This was southern democrats. Abraham Lincoln was a Republican. The South was still sore from the civil war so they always voted Democrat wether it was in their best interest or not. They called it the solid south. After the democrats backed the civil rights movement they lost the solid south and these southern democrats got folded in to the modern Republican party.
>>768679331
Disagree, it's good entertainment, I get called racist now and again, my response is something like, "Yep. That's fine." "Guess so. Oh well." "Really? That's okay I guess." and their assrage goes off the scale.
>>768679697
See this is how fucking brainwashed you morons are today.
You're the 18th person to say this retarded shit.
THE MODERN WELFARE STATE IS DEMOCRATIC SLAVERY.
>>768679742
Look how mad these little racist piece of shit is getting.
DEMOCRATS TRYING TO CONSERVE WHAT IS = CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRATS = DEMOCRATS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPXTWJhnYM
Democrats DID start the KKK.
Democrats ARE the party of slavery.
Democrats ARE the party of Jim Crow.
Democrats ARE the party of segregation.
Democrats DID oppose Civil Rights.
Democrats DID oppose voting rights.
>People are upset that the FTC will regulate the internet over the FCC.
fuck off
>>768679216
yall dont even know what you stand for anymore. you just want to make sure everyone else gets less than you
>>768679786
нeт нeт, you already pasted that.
>>768679621
>Southern Democratic """""conservatives""""" wanted to uphold slavery
>Modern democrats do want to """""conserve""""" welfare programs.
>they're the same thing guys!
your ratarted
>>768679824
Nice to see you not being able to rebut my point or come up with an answer to my question.
>>768672061
> implying that change is good
> implying that progress is good
Both change and progress can, in fact, be a bad thing.
>>768679744
racism amounts to 'noticing patterns of behavior.' i've never understood why snowflakes get so butthurt over something so benign
>>768679786
>Democrats DID start the KKK.
>Democrats ARE the party of slavery.
>Democrats ARE the party of Jim Crow.
>Democrats ARE the party of segregation.
170 years ago. American politics has 180'd since then.
>Democrats DID oppose Civil Rights.
>Democrats DID oppose voting rights.
False.
>>768679888
They're both slavery.
>>768679786
give it a rest, ivan. nobody is watching your propaganda.
>>768679967
Dave Rubin was a progressive democrat when he had Larry Elder on that program.
In just 1 hour Larry converted Dave into a conservative.
>>768679919
i dont argue with voluntarily retarded people
>>768678969
Not the same, the internet contains a lot of useful information, cnn is just drama tv for retards
>>768679939
Change can be good or bad, PROGRESS is explicitly positive. You may not like someone else's "progress", but that's just because you don't think it IS progress.
Be as negative about "progressive politics" as you want, but fuck off with redefining the English language.
So, for the non-Russians among us - is there any decent way to salvage the GOP?
>>768671303
>t. retard who doesn't understand net neutrality
>>768680065
You asked me the first question though, I answered with a question that you couldn't answer because you know your position is shit.
Should we tear down the Washington Monument?
Should we tear down Mount Rushmore?
lol
>>768679940
>marching down streets with tiki torches chanting "blood and soil"
>being literal literal white supremacists
>alt-brighters who shitpost debunked psuedo-science all day
>we're just calmly and kindly pointing out differences in behavioral patterns guys honest!
>>768680155
>I answered with a question
Correction, I answered then asked a question
>>768680118
McCain is dying so probably not.
>>768680118
Implying the DNC isn't bankrupt.
Also fuck the Neo cons.
>>768680186
>>768680186
This is the assrage I was talking about, the salt level is delicious :^)
LMAO!
>>768680155
kek, being this upset that someone doesn't think you're smart.
>>768680118
guy, how to fuck niggo in this city
>>768680215
I have a hard time mustering sympathy for McCain, tbh; same shit happened with him that happened to Dole. He thought he *deserved* the presidency, and started to veer hard right so he could win over the faithful, and ended up kind of batshit crazy. The net effect now is that while he talks a good talk, he never actually fucking votes against any of the horrible proposals.
>>768680116
One can easily progress down the wrong path.
>>768680333
Still hasn't come up with a proper rebuttal.
Nice projection though anon.
>>768672164
It is true that change does not mean progress, but progress does involve change
>>768680333
>>768680333
lol
>>768680375
Very much so, see the last 8 years under Obama
>>768680245
Oh, they're terrible too - just not as terrible. Clinton's "third way" bullshit - that is, "suck up to wall street and tongue their assholes" - is responsible for the current economic mess. And then the DCCC wants to just do more of the same. The Dems are fucking awful at organizing and getting shit done. But they're not as bad as the GOP, and they haven't quite lost their moral compass.
>>768679216
>Are you OK with destroying any monuments to our founding fathers because they had slaves?
Uh, yes. Because I'm not a racist. Put the fucking things in museums.
>>768675520
nothing should be free, because nothing IS free
>>768680410
We're not erasing your defenders of the crime of slavery, we are denying them the honor they so rightfully do not deserve.
>>768680462
>But they're not as bad as the GOP, and they haven't quite lost their moral compass.
LOL, what moral compass?
>>768680496
So you do want to tear down the Washington Monument and Mount Rushmore.
Good to know.
>>768680118
the problem will correct itself when the boomers die off and conservatives lose their largest and most out-of-touch voting bloc.worst case scenario we could potentially suffer through two, maybe three more conservative presidential terms, but that's pretty much it.
>>768679940
Racism is also the best way to tell if someone has a firm grasp on reality or not.
>>768680496
>>768680557
Why were you scared to admit it above?
>>768679697
Do you seriously expect anyone to believe your liberal propaganda that the parties switched sides? There's one HUGE obstacle to that point of view: the previous republicans were already not racist at all as evidenced by now they were the ones that wanted slavery to end and voting rights and all. Even if democrats suddenly became less racist, why would anyone switch to republicans which already was extremely less racist than all? If I'm a hardcore racist 10/10, and the republican was 0/10 racist and the democratic party 10/10 racist but then democratic party suddenly went to 5/10 racist, why the fuck would I switch to 0/10 republican when democrat is still at least more racist? Why the fuck would republicans who were traditionally not racist at all decide to jump ship when they knew they had the correct view all along? I would never switch to democrat even if they seemed like they were starting to shift more towards my views because it's just bait, and I'm sure others back then would have felt the same way.
>>768680321
>mistaking being called a retard for "salty assrage"
you just can't stop fantasizing about licking salty ass, can you? have you confessed this to your priest?
>>768680363
I understand that but you could tell he absolutely hated having to pander to the bottom part of the Republican base for votes. During a tour on the election trail I saw him snatch a microphone away from an old lady who was calling Barack a Muslim. The look of embarrassment on his face told me all I needed to know about the man. He just wanted small government and conservative fiscal policy he hated needing those inbred camo wearing in public dirt farmers for votes.
>>768680588
Democrats were trying to give up their plantation black voters for illegal mexicans voters.
At this rate, they're already finished.
>>768679940
I really think it’s because every group like to feel superior in some way. In the way conservatives feel superior in the use of logic over emotions, liberals feel morally superior in their emotions and feelings and use it as a bludgeon.
>>768673323
>being this naive
ahhh to be 14 again
>>768680755
He is right though, have you read the Constitution or the Bill of Rights?
>>768680682
the salt must be strong :)
>>768680435
not that I support the fatlards in the south toppling monuments as opposed to placing them in museums, but isis is destroying actual history and heritage, whereas all they're getting rid of in the south are monuments of a failed, traitorous state who didn't even want monuments of themselves to begin with.
>>768680710
Yeah, I don't think he's completely lost his soul - but he sure hasn't actually done much lately to try and stem the tide. And at this point I don't think he has a lot of time left to try.
>>768680833
>but isis is destroying actual history and heritage, whereas all they're getting rid of in the south are monuments of a failed, traitorous state who didn't even want monuments of themselves to begin with.
You're dumb, those same people that are funding the people tearing down monuments also want any monuments of the founding fathers torn down.
>>768680833
>>768680938
Why do you think retard above still won't respond to me?
They're trying to erase history, not fight racism.
>>768680938
>also want any monuments of the founding fathers torn down.
let us know when they start toppling every monument to our founding fathers.
>>768671303
Why do faggots always use politics to try and impose a false sense of superiority?
>>768680992
>waaaaah why won't they respond to my shitposts!
aww, here's a (you) lil fellah. now git on outta here ya rascal
>>768681082
>false
>>768681020
They have went on National Television stating just that anon.
We'll kill them if they try, that's why it won't happen.
>>768680794
Yes. But you either live in a fantasy world or are just ignorant af if you think that's how the system actually works. On paper it sounds great, unfortunately not at all a reality
>>768681096
These are shitposts?
>>768680557
>>768680155
Wew
>>768680755
Some people stay 14 forever.
Many of them are Libertarians.
>>768681142
>if you think that's how the system actually works.
You mean, if you think that's how the system works today because of crony politicians being bought off.
I agree, but that's not how it was intended.
>>768671303
He has such a punchable face.
>>768681209
>hyperbolous rhetorical questions about tearing down national monuments
yes, ivan, they're shitposts. you're a paid professional, you already know this.
>>768681082
>false
Not true. For example liberals are lazy leeches on civilized society who can't even figure out which bathroom to use, politics is an accurate identifier of different groups of people like this.
>>768681222
jesus christ why are people who save/repost memes so fucking awkward.
>>768681307
Stop projecting.
The only paid shills here are paid for by China and Progressive hacks.
>>768681379
вы yжe вcтaвили этo.
>>768681266
so you agree but wanted to argue semantics?
our exchange has been pointless.
>I love you, /b/ stay classy
>>768681564
>If I keep typing in Russian, everyone will think Russian shills are here
>Durrrr
The post.
>>768681586
Actually, it's you who didn't agree, who used semantics.
>>768681632
I don't know the Russian word for "gaslighting", alas. How's Olgino this time of year?
>>768678283
HAHAHAHAHA Dude....
The slave states did all that stuff, and the slave states left the Democratic party in 1968 because the rest of the Dem party was trying to add civil rights (as in not having to sit at the back of the bus or use separate water fountains).
The KKK, slavery, oppose civil rights voters are now the Republican base, since Reagan courted them into the current GOP coalition.
Who opposed slavery? same states that are Dem states now, New York etc.
nice try, trickster.
>>768679940
Anti-racist dumdums aren't the brightest bulbs, usually thick as the proverbial brown stuff
>>768681776
I'm from NY anon, stop projecting.
Shareblue isn't sending their best these days.
>>768681990
Oh? Where in New York? You don't seem like someone who would go to Duff's.
>>768676560
>spooky text over a picture of wimmen
careful dude, you're going to make all the /pol/ NEETS brick their khakis.
>>768682065
Upstate.
>>768671303
What’s wrong with net neutrality being gone?
>>768682211
Corporations cannot fuck over starting companies through lobbying politicians.
>>768677287
>this is what /pol/acks seriously believe
>>768682191
really, well, I'm from Utica and I've never heard anybody use the phrase "steamed hams".
>>768682308
>Anyone who disagrees with me is from /pol/
>>768682337
When did I use the term steamed hams?
Are you drunk?
>>768682265
If the problem with net neutrality being gone is lobbying issues, then you are talking about a problem with government that is much larger than this. Also, isn’t the FCC lobby for telecom companies already? Isn’t that why we don’t have international business and they never compete against each other?
>>768675158
>>768673273
>not knowing about the 19th century party switch
wew lad
>>768682421
Russian/underage confirmed.
>>768682558
No response to my post, just more shit flinging?
Can't say I'm surprised.
>>768682512
>Doesn't know the atrocities of the Welfare State
Wew
Democrat party idiots really come across as nothing but strange and weird cultists now.
>>768682699
Thelema, look it up.
They're pieces of shit.
>>768671303
>>768682699
I hope you're not implying the repubican party is any better
>>768682806
The democrat scum would have everyone give up everything.
They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~~ Benjamin Franklin ~~
>>768682981
The lesser of two weavils?
>>768683055
They've been coordinating their plans for it for many many years.
Agenda 21
Agenda 2030
They've even openly stated that they'd like people to live in MegaCities and own NOTHING and lease everything.
They've stated that you don't own your bed, when you're at work, someone else will sleep in it.
It's literal slavery and pathetic.
>>768683117
gotta follow something amirite
>>768683379
No.
>>768683379
We did.
>>768683524
Who is we?
>>768679947
The welfare system is just another form of slavery for niggers you faggot and a way to keep them voting for Dems.
How's that swamp draining going, redhats?
Donald Trump would never have gotten as far as he did without net neutrality
>>768683524
good job sheep
>>768683711
Haha, okay bro. Guess that means those tens of millions of white Americans receiving food stamps and Medicaid are also slaves?
>>768683644
The ones who woke up.
>>768683781
The absolute state of D&C shills.
>>768683711
That's why the democrat party types want illegals in so much, it helps the democrat voting base. Always follow that, always. The democrat party types think that if illegals are in and they get free shit then it ties it to them so will get them votes.
>>768671303
Why do non liberals have to cry a out everything.. Its making you all look like fools. Like you didn't get your way so crying is Gunna make people feel sorry for you. Until they give in to shut you all up
>>768673273
is this picture >impying that crop picking is something we should be trying to give to white people?
>>768683820
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/eisenhower-warns-of-military-industrial-complex
Is mohammet repub? News to me...
>>768683884
>D&C
Oh boy
>>768672061
>half our country literally has such a 50 IQ
America is around 17th in education, the entire country is full of morons
>>768683890
Exactly, but when you look at the data, those peoples lives become shit under Democrat rule.
Their families get torn apart and they become victims who are told that the Republicans are at fault for their problems.
>>768684026
white people are far too lazy for crop picking
you'd have to pay them $1000 an hour
>>768675516
"Klanbake" meme
In 2015, conservative blogs and Facebook pages started circulating a photo of hooded Klansmen supposedly marching at the 1924 Democratic convention. In early 2017, a pro-Trump Facebook group called "ElectTrump2020" turned the photo into a meme which has since been shared more than 18,000 times on Facebook alone. In fact, the widely circulated photo depicts an anti-immigrant march by Klansmen in Madison, Wisconsin, and has no connection to any political convention. An archivist for the Wisconsin Historical Society, which published the photo in 2001, stated that the society is "painfully aware" that the photo has been "misappropriated and distributed without our permission."[4] The term "Klanbake" appears to have originated in a dispatch by a New York Daily News reporter referring sardonically to the discovery of the KKK presence at the 1924 DNC convention. An investigation by journalist Jennifer Mendelsohn and historian Peter Shulman found no other mention of the term until it was resurrected by a Daily News columnist in 2000.[4][28] In 2010, the conservative news site Breitbart published a series of articles insinuating that the KKK is historically solely a Democratic organization,[29][4] and hyper-partisan social media helped spread the "Klanbake" meme widely in the following years, helped by the fact that Wikipedia claimed from 2005 to 2018 that the convention was "also called the Klanbake".[4]
look at your own links stupid
>>768683884
nigger I've been against both parties since the 90's kys cancer
>>768684086
>D&C
Yes, Divide and Conquer.
You're terrible at it.
>>768683890
fake birth certificate
biggest inauguration...ever
3 million illegal votes
ah, the poorly educated
>>768684207
Trump wasn't the choice of either party.
Kys shill.
>>768684297
>of either party.
Of either "Establishment" party*
>>768680410
>reads 1984 once
>>768684297
>Trump wasn't the choice
he was specifically chosen out of a YUUUGE pile of shit, and embraced by all afterward
>>768684297
Yes yes the billionare was on your side
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
>>768680557
mount rushmore is fucking stupid anyway go ahead
it should never have been done in the first place
>>768684419
>>768684200
>too lazy
>unless paid
think you have the wrong definition of lazy there.
more like white people are smart enough to not get shit underpaid jobs.
