This is Deanne Carson.
Last week ABC television in Melbourne featured an interview with this 'sexuality expert' Deanne Carson on the issue of creating a culture of consent.
Her point was that the next time you change your kid's smelly diaper, make sure you ask for permission. It's the only way to ensure your child consents.
Oh boy, are we really becoming this pussy-whipped culture in the west?
She's only a sexuality expert cos s/he's tried them all already.
>>768626387
Why is that suddenly after hundreds of millennia of evolution humans were doing things like changing diapers wrong?
>>768626387
>Australia
ching chong ching SELLOUT NATION ching chongga chang!
So once the jews completely destroy western culture, whats next? Do they understand they can't blend into china?
>>768626547
because people are bored and people are stupid
>>768626387
Consider- Rational adults have always said that children CANNOT give consent to about anything as they are unable to use adult reasoning as to something's consequences. This goes from something as innocuous as sweets before dinner, to having sex.
Yet, this pink-haired monster is trying to change all that. She's starting with "consent to change a nappy", but that's not the end game. They want children to be able to consent to transgender shit and every other SJW abomination you can imagine.
This is not about diapers. It's about destroying every rational sensibility there is in raising a child.
>>768626791
it's clear you've never been to melbourne.
>>768626930
>adult reasoning
prove that is a real thing.
>>768626387
So, if we ask the baby and they say no... do we just never change their diapers? Do we watch them die slowly from having a shit filled diapie?
>>768626387
>are we really becoming this pussy-whipped culture in the west?
Already have, OP.
>>768626930
So will they be able to consent to sex? I might just start agreeing with her.
>>768626547
This is a Jew backed experiment that is going to end badly.
>>768627126
>shit filled diaper will kill you
she thinks the baby will learn to ask
>>768627313
This anon is asking the right questions.
>>768626387
They found a crazy to put on tv. Do all those crazy hicks us liberals find and broadcast speak for all republicans?
>>768626387
Yay it’s this thread again
>>768626930
100% this. Bunch of pedo fucks that want to claim babies and shit can consent to their perversions.
>>768627699
>I swear officer, I asked the baby if I could put just the tip, and she smiled and nodded
>Well alright then citizen.
Can't wait.
>>768627699
Check your privilege asshole, she was born the wrong age and you need to respect her choices.
>>768626387
There's 25 million of you kangaroo fuckers. Dye your hair purple and spew out some nonsense and you'll be on television too. I mean come on, what else have you got to watch on TV except the 24 hr loop of Crocodile Dundee 3?
>>768626387
Her hair looks like steped on fairy floss, dumb cunt should be curbed.
>>768626387
>Child can consent to diaper changes
>Child CAN'T consent to sex.
>>768626387
Apparently she does really good work with teens and sex assault victims etc.
But this shit's over the top.
What response could a baby give to indicate consent?
>>768626930
>As a child I don't consent to eating vegetables
>As a child I don't consent to going to school
>As a child I don't consent to being punished
I see where this is going. Sounds familiar...
>South Park: The Wacky Molestation Adventure
>Original air date December 13, 2000
Cartman suggests that he call the police and tell them that his parents have been "molestering" him, which will make them go away (a trick he played on his mother's ex-boyfriend).
Soon, nearly all of the town's adults have been arrested, the rest having moved away over fears of being arrested and only the children populate the town. With the adults gone and the town in the children's control, Stan declares, "It's ours."
Mark realizes that the town has descended into anarchy because the parents were all falsely accused of molesting the children.
I've seen this 'story' several times, but this finally got me to go check it out. Sadly, it's typical internet BS, just another comment taken entirely out of context for the sake of bitching.
In the original context, it still sounds kind of bullshit to me, but not in the 'nefarious' way everyone is making it out to be.
>>768629490
Pee (or worse) in its diaper.
>>768630282
What kind of fucking context do you need?
"Your baby must consent to you taking off it's diaper".
Fuck you.
NEW
DIAPER
THREAD
POST EM
ABDL NEW THREAD
SHES A CUNT
POST
DIAPERS
>>768630817
The idea wasn't to actually get consent. Deanne Carson even says, right after suggesting doing this, that baby's can't give consent. The idea was that by asking your baby, and pausing, you'd be somehow socializing it.
The question isn't "Is this social/pedo/whatever bullshit," it's "Does science support that a sub-year old baby have the awareness or brain power for this to matter." I'd think not, but it's not what everyone's making it out to be.
ITT: incels
P O S T
>>768631482
You got it, pal.
>>768631776
;)
>>768626387
SHE ONLY CONCEIVED OF THIS BECAUSE HER BABY ROLEPLAY GIRLFRIEND WANTED TO BASTE IN HER OWN FECES A WHILE LONGER AND GOT UPSET WHEN THIS DYKE CHANGED HER NAPPY WITHOUT PERMISSION.
THE ONLY OTHER OPTION IS THAT SHE HAS SEXUALIZED CHILDREN SHITTING THEMSELVES.
GAS THE DYKES, RAPE WAR NOW
Post diaper
This bitch ain’t worth
Make this the new ABDL diaper thread!
<3
Who’s padded?
Where’s Scotty?
She’s so cute ~
how is she allowed around kids she has no degree in teaching or sexual education this dumb bitch is only a writer but she sucked so bad
What is this degeneracy?
>>768627313
Now we’re talking
All diapers welcome!
This is the new thread
She ain’t worth
So I comendeer the threads
3 for 3 If this goes my way
Post diaper!!
>>768626791
They blend in with mudslimes
>>768632136
Even 2d diaper
>>768626387
omg she said "your kid probably wont consent, just ask rhetorically, they find it comforting to be talked to, and have a signal that can predict whats next"
typical all men skim the headline and then make "HAHAHA FEMINISTS" jokes without reading a single book on feminism
go ahead, skim my post too and then refute what i (didn't) say
>>768632045
4chan, of course.
Cute ~
>>768632369
You said
Stop posting diaper porn!
I say prove me wrong
Give me support fellows!
Post ABDL
>>768632505
>>768626387
why is her face so punchable?
>>768632505
you got me.
2d for the win?
>>768632671
>>768632703
>>768632614
if i left that image open and went to school and my parents found it,
i'd have to commit sepuku. its too shameful
>>768632657
your mom didn't hug you enough?
>>768626547
control
>>768632715
>>768632717
>>768632671
>>768632742
>>768632766
Seek professional help bud
>>768632772
Well, you'd better go all in.
OK, enough of these little league pictures.
>>768632703
<3
Post a diaper pic! Can’t beat em so join us :)
If you all realize all women and boys are children making them humiliated and submissive with diaper play is the most alpha thing !
>>768632846
hey actually you're a furry. there's this image of a dog (grey husky) giving a reach around to another dog, they're in an alley in daytime and there's a parade or something around the corner. you got it?
>>768632816
I have
They said it’s fine tbh
>>768632913
diaps ftw
>>768632991
>>768632614
>>768632645
>>768632671
>>768632715
>>768632571
People have real issues with diapers!
>>768626387
She's really dumb but at least this sort of implies she's not a pedo
Pedo shit < ABDL
JESUSSSS
Anyway~ post good ABDL
>>768631344
It's still bullshit because if you do this, as soon as the child has a first flash of coherent thought, it will understand you aren't the parent / authority figure if you're asking about everything. Then it's just a ticking bomb until the kid puts two and two together (maybe before they can even add 2 and 2) and wonders how much trouble they can get you into claiming they didn't consent to something, or how they can frighten you with the threat of it to make you do whatever they want. It's absolute madness that will result eventually in a generation of effectively unraisable kids (way beyond what you might think is now the case) who end up some kind of feral generation.
Booiooooooooo
Post 3D ABDL
>>768633344
>>768626565
second
this country sucks
and wait until the economy tanks. then we'll see the true value created by these productive foreigners, their 7 "Australian" children, and their diabetic aged parents really are
it's going to be a nightmare
>>768633207
Your conclusions are questionable, at best. But again, context matters, and the issue is consistently misrepresented, here and elsewhere.
>>768626387
JOIN MY DISCORD FOR REAL FEMANONS AND TRAPS
FC2kpPq
FC2kpPq
FC2kpPq
FC2kpPq
>>768626387
>Pink hair
>Androgenous looks
>Trying to control peoples behaviour while seeming to be on the 'right' side (hey man consent is everything)
Agenda much? Shitty media gives these nutballs way too much airtime.
>>768633384
"WHO WANTS ICE CREAM?!?!"
"YAAAAAY"
"by asking a question you've revealed yourself not be an authority figure, and your kids don't respect you. fall of Rome" - Anon
>>768626387
People who have the balls to try and lecture society as a whole deserve to be academically and intellectually ripped apart. If their theories pass, great. If not, the news station needs to correct themselves.
>>768633494
"Who wants ice cream" is a very different question than "May I have your permission for us to go get ice cream." The minute you condition your child to be asked for consent for everything they will understand they can say no. Then what?
"May I brush your hair?"
"No!"
"May I wash you hair?"
"No, I don't wanna."
Then your kid has tangled, matted, lice ridden hair. Great job.
>>768634406
This. We live in an age where the news drops a story and then there is no follow up ever. Ever. The same with people making these crazy claims. You never find out that a month later they were shitcanned for spouting unproven nonsense. You never find out that someone's idea has been discredited and should now be ignored. If a theory is discredited then it's only in a way that the original quack gets away never being mentioned.
>>768634406
before you academically and intellectually rip her apart, perhaps you should read her article in full you fucking charlatan idiot
