So, /b/?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
So, /b/?
D. The child who's strong enough to take it from the three.
>who would you give it to
Wait, it's currently my flute? Or have they appointed me as arbiter of their spat? Who currently owns the flute?
Cut the flute into three pieces and give them each one piece.
>>768485695
It's a skin flute.
B cause it's not a ginger.
So wait a minute, some kid made itself a flute, than one poor as F soulless redhead and one pretentious as F soulless redhead come up to it and starter fight, because they need it more? Well, fuck A and C than.
B 100%
B.
Fuck A, she can buy a flute if she didn't already have one (how did she learn?)
Fuck C, how will having something he doens't know how to use improve his life?
>>768485505
A: Republican
B: Libertarian
C: Democrat
>>768485505
A is entitled. Sure she can use it but she expects to not have to pay for it.
B made it and deserves compensation if someone else wants the flute
C is a fucking gommunist. ''improved my life immeasurably''. Ehm lmao, for C it's just a stick, he can't use it.
B can have it.
>>768485505
/b/
>>768485505
id fuck the first one with the flute
>>768485505
B is the very obvious choice, but I can see valid arguments for A as well.
If you consider C, go fuck yourself.
>>768485505
None of them. This isn't fucking music class you brats.
Give it to B
She created the flute, plus she can learn how to play it, which leads to her gaining a new life skill.
A can already play it therefore she can probably get another flute easily, and C is a shithead who thinks he deserves everything because he's poor
>>768485505
A gives money to B
C can fuck off
>>768486367
>but I can see valid arguments for A as well.
If she knows how to play the flute it's only logical to assume she already has a flute.
>>768485505
Nobody is gonna post the greentext?
Sad...
>>768485505
id tell them all that the flute is a faggy instrument and they should strive to play something better. then id break the flute before their eyes to end their petty childish argument. thats literally the only fair solution.
>>768485505
Marry, Fuck, Kill
>>768486462
100% this
>>768485505
C, he deserves it because hes poor
>>768486505
You are not supposed to make any assumptions beyond what is explicitely given.
So for the sake of the argument, none of them have a flute.
I give each of the children the Flute. the flute is my dick
>>768486708
Fucking idiot.
>pic related (you)
>>768485505
A would get the flute, but would give money to B for it so she could make another one if she wanted it. Give the third kid some food. What the fuck is he going to do with a flute?
>>768485505
i would let child a strap me, i would fuck child b anally and let child c fuck me
B. A should exchange something with B if A wants it so bad. C is irrelevant.
>>768486178
>implying there’s a right answer
Anything goes so long as you can justify yourself, which you didn’t faggot
C is a faggot.
B does not need a flute if he can't play it, that's a loss of time.
A is a lazy fag and should play for B, B should keep on making flutes, perhaps C stops being a pussy and actually learns how to do something like playing the flute or making more flutes.
>>768485505
Child B. If she truly made it then it's a theft to take it from her.
>>768485505
None of them since they're all evil white caucasian people.
>>768486063
What good would the flute do for B? artists and sculptors and people who make things don't typically want to hold onto that shit "just because I made it". Most people make things to give to people or help others or make money. Of course it should be B's to choose what is done with it, but if she just wants to keep it to look at I'd slap the shit out of her.
>>768486893
like a fucking child can make a flute, that shit is built in factories by machines n shit. therefore child b is a lying nigger and child a should get it
>>768485505
Obviously it's the property of b. B can sell it to a, if they want it so bad.
>>768485505
have child A buy the flute from child B like the normal world
>>768486960
you capitalist pig
Child D
"for i am black and we wuz kangz. We wuz also oppressed by whitey. Gibs me dat flute nigga. Ill use that floot in muh rap song video where I shove it so far up whiteys ass."
obviously give to child D.
>>768486505
Most people learn to play an instrument before they spend thousands of dollars on one. More than likely she would have rented one from whoever taught her.
>>768486708
Fuck him. He could rise up and become the most powerful man in the world if he were to apply himself. I mean sure it would be a lot better to have headstarts and advantages in life but not all of us got it like that. Some are more fortunate then others. But is it has been done, a person was once dirt poor but made the correct life choices and became the best.
>>768486911
Das riiiite.
That flute is for reparashuns, whitey!
>>768486801
So, c shouldn't get some kind of compensation just because he's poor? He hasn't provided my thing, or brought anything to the table. Survival of the fittest, faglord.
Its already child B's flute. Child A's parents should buy it from child B, supporting her flute business and her daughter's natural talent. Child C... some poor entitled shit. plus, what kind of boy wants to play a flute? he sounds like a faggot in the making. dont encourage that.
>>768487013
Anything*
>>768486998
typical republican mouth feces
C, because he could sell the flute to feed his family
>>768486998
Dammn one off
>>768485505
Whoever can bring themselves to orgasm faster with the flute gets it.
Then I'd give it to all 3 of them. Rough and fast.
>>768485505
B, cuz she owns it.
she can choose to give it to A
>>768487054
Communist scum
>>768487013
He gets food because he's here and doesn't have a choice whether he's poor or not because he's a fucking child. We discarded Darwinism as soon as we entered the industrial revolution.
>>768485505
Give to A, as they can do something with it, compensate B, they made it, and teach C how to rob the rich kids
>>768485505
if child b made the flute it is theirs to begin with, why the fuck do you have it now and what gives you the right to decide who has it there after, it has already been stolen from child b
Destroy the flute. Confine the children to the basement for the afternoon for squabbling. Now I can watch TV in peace.
>>768485505
D. Break the flute in half and toss it on the floor.
>>768485505
Fuck child C
Give it to child B
If Child A wants the flute, she can WORK HARD to get MONEY to BUY it, the same way Child B WORKED HARD to create it
>>768487098
This one time, at band camp...
>>768486927
She made it, theirfore she owns it, so in conclusion she can do whatever the fuck she wants with it. So we now can conclude further that you are a weird commie faggot.
>>768485505
Have C suck my dick in the exchange for the flute.
None. I have the flute and I'm bigger than all the children so I keep it
>>768486117
A. Communism
B. Capitalism (in theory)
C. Communism
>>768485505
Give it to A. Use a performances to get funds so B can make more flutes and can keep a reasonable amount for herself as long as it dosen't affect production. Get C to work for B. Soon both C will have enough money, and the number of flutes will have caused enough deflation so he too can have a flute. Everyone is happy.
>>768486178
>has God of mouse castration on his computer
There is literally no metaphor for the level of insecurity going on here because I think this situation serves as it's own metaphor
>>768487315
I'm fine with that. People holding onto shit they don't need and can't use is infuriating. But like I said earlier, most creators don't want to hold onto their useless crap just because they made it. People don't make things to hoard them, so I'm confident child B would do something to get rid of it on her own anyway.
>>768487531
COMMIE COMMIE REDISTRIBUTION DOES NOT WORK BECAUSE CAPITALISM IS THE ONLY WAY WE CAN MAINTAIN ANY LEVEL OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY!
Solomon would've told the three childeren
>'Since I can't discern who deserves the flute will break the flute in twain'
>The child who would protest the loudest would be granted the flute of solomon.
Jesus would've given the flute to child B because she created it.
Karl Marx would've taken the flute for himself. Pawned it and used the money to pay off his debt sharks. But in return Karl marx would've given child B the raw materials to make 3 flutes -one for each of the three childeren.
>because a flute isn't really worth more than the wood it's made out of.
>>768486990
This is the only non-racist answer. The rest of you are all skinheads.
>>768485505
The only problem with this chart is that it's about a fucking flute.
If this were about food, the story is different
A. I should get the raw chicken because I know how to cook
B. I farmed the chickens. I don't know how to cook but they are my chickens
C. Please. I'm starving to death. I'm 6 years old and I go to sleep hungry every night. Just one night I'd like to have some food in my tummy
>>768486927
>Respect property rights (even though ownership isn't stated)
>Violate the NAP
wew lad
>>768485505
B obviously
>>768485505
realisitcally, it's between A and B, C can go kill itself.
>>768487686
>because a flute isn't really worth more than the wood it's made out of.
Well, it could and couldn't be. The cold could be really bad at making flutes and the raw materials would have been worth more because they had potential. Or she could be the best at it, and the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. There is no doubt a Strativarius violin is worth more than the wood it was made from, because the work was such quality it cannot be reproduced.
i get the flute so i can stick it up my ass
>>768487706
What's different about it? Either pay up or fuck off and get your own chickens.
>>768485505
none of them because a flute is fucking annoying
>>768487686
>isn't really worth more than the wood it's made out of
Wrong. The effort and craftsmanship that went into making it gives it a higher value than just a stick. By that logic, your house is only worth the price of the wood and concrete and plaster, or your car is only worth the plastic and metal and leather.
>>768487468
In no way is A communism. A is right wing authoritarianism
>>768488165
MFW no flute.
>>768488185
no you're wrong, it's only worth what someone will pay for it, once perfectly functional objects (with many hours of skill involved in manufacture) become just their scrap value everyday if nobody wants to pay anymore
>>768485846
fucking genius
>>768485505
>>768485505
fuck you....You fucking niggers...I hope you find out your mom passed on mothers day because of huge of a shit posting bot you are...There is no punishment bold enough or deep enough for you fucking nigger.
>>768486708
>>768486708
"Deserves" what fucking planet do you live on nigger.....You deserve a 9mm to the dome.
>>768485505
A: Socialism
B: Capitalism
C: Communism
>>768488030
cant we do this to op and whomst drew this shit tier comic>?
>>768486911
Are you assuming their race/gender/color/age?. You r a transphobic piece of shit. Kys fagot
>>768485505
I would give all three the D
>>768488628
I'm okay with this.
>>768485505
>tfw you actually studied at LKY
>>768485505
Child B, assuming she made it herself with her own funding too (like, if A paid for it and suddenly B didn't want to sell it anymore).
I can't see how this is up for debate though...
Give to C. He's poor and would appreciate it most. A probably already has a flute, B can just make another one.
>>768485505
Kid A gets the flute, Kid B gets some food vouchers, Kid C gets a job at the local factory.
such is life.
explain to child A and child B that i will break the flute in two and give both parts to them (child C doesn't get anything since he is a fucking communist) the one that acts the saddest towards my statement then gets the flute
>>768488907
So you think it's just IK to take B's flute by force and tell her to deal with it?
What are you, a fucking commie?
is fucking the children legal in this scenario?
>>768486927
You're probably right, most sculptures want to sell, but in this particular instance she wants to keep. Maybe she wants to learn too.
>>768487468
B is communism. No where do you hear capitalists talking about the fruit of labour
>>768489015
Well apparently it's my flute to give away, not hers.
>>768485505
a
make kid B teach kid C how to make flutes while the faggot kid A is playing in the backround}
and i, if you ask me, will be in the bushes, masturbating to the sweet sweet tone of children cooperating
>>768485574
/thread
I'd ask B if I could give it to C
>>768485505
b made it and no one is offering money for it, give the mfucking flute back to b.
>>768485505
it belongs to B. A would have to buy it and C is garbage.
>>768488030
why are they burning a fucking dog? grown ass adults doing shit like that. for fuck sake
>>768485505
Y not have A and C help B make 2 more flutes so all of them can have one and it's a good for A she can play now and it's good for C he can have a much more incredible worth of something by helping and learning how to make it more than the ownership of one but having one is a benefit now too I think thus is how it works best and B gets the admiration and friendship of a and c now
Give it to the C, because girls shouldn't own property
>>768486927
flute could be an art piece of her creations, like any art, u fucking monkey open your mind
B is my first thought, but id probably keep the flute for myself since it seems to have come into my possession, then sell it.
>>768489576
you mean property shouldn't own property
>>768485505
whichever makes me cum the hardest
>>768485505
A
B produced the flute so I'd give her money to make more . A can play it and make beautiful music for us all. However C is the man and it is his responsibility to further society. We all know that when push comes to shove B or A will get knocked up and stop playing/making flutes in order to be a stay at home mom. Therefore the best bet for society at large is C. However, coddling a man when he's young inculcates the message of entitlement and government dependency. He would become a NEET faggot like most of you guys. Thus we must give the flute to A. Flute playing is feminine and she will be able to attract a quality mate better by playing it. B is engaged in manly activities that will bring her no joy of man or children if she continues. She'll be a barren tatted up silicon valley whore by age 40
>>768485505
whom EVER can afford to BUY the flute
The answer isn't to just give them the flute right away.
The answer is to access their negotiation skills and teach them better negotiation skills on the spot. They use the negotiation skills to determine a fair answer themselves. You don't want to just impose your authority and steal it from them and give it to somebody else.
Besides, after you left they would still fight over the flute anyways no matter who it was given to.
>>768486927
Stradivari didn't play the violin all that well either. He was a craftsman and was very picky as to who got to use the tools (in this case musicians wishing to play his violins) that he created.
Child B must receive the flute and then decide to either sell it to whoever he deems fit, keep it, or take it apart and rebuild it in order to further master his skills.
>>768485505
B. because its theirs. They made it. Anyone can learn to play a flute so A.'s reasoning is stupid. And giving it to C. would be an injustice to B. Pretty sure I intervened to stop an injustice, not commit one. Honestly I'd teach child B. how to defend herself too so she didn't have to deal with assholes trying to take her shit. It only takes 8lbs of pressure to collapse someone's windpipe. Then they really won't have a reason to play a flute.
Put C's penis on B's pussy. Put B's tongue on A's pussy. Put A's and C's mouths to suck my cock. Fuck all of them with the flute. Everyone happy. Just saying.
>>768487019
This is the only logical conclusion. Awarded one Pepe touch by other posters mom's.
>>768487706
Good way to extend the analogy, because then children A and B can form a mutually rewarding partnership.
>in b4 communism
>the partnership gets to set its supply of finished product (i.e. cooked chicken) and set the price that allows child B to create a very productive farm and permits child A to have the kitchen she needs to cook.
>>768488907
I am completely okay with your picture. Many thanks for posting that. Your argument is still shit though.
>>768489689
>this much autism in one post
>>768489666
Trips of truth
