The NRA is a terrorist organization
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
The NRA is a terrorist organization
>>768242943
So is ISIS, what's your point?
>>768242943
>so they're the Democrats?
>>768242943
No, but its literally Voldemort
>>768242943
Their new president is Oliver North, who was convicted in the 80s of illegally selling guns to Iran, making him a conservative hero overnight.
>>768243515
Voldemort only got taken down because every teacher (and student) was armed with a deadly weapon.
oh hi tides your back
>>768242943
>>768243515
>>768243623
samefag
>>768243708
Your mom is a terrorist organization
>>768243641
Try telling the Woke Parkland Teens that
>>768242943
B8 thread
The NRA is not a terrorist organization and Donald Trump is doing well as a president and feminism is a joke. Change my mind.
>>768243641
>>768243950
Jesus christ they really need to read a different book
>>768243641
Kek
>>768244045
>>768243950
>>768243641
wands were also highly regulated and only trained people who had studied a long time were allowed to have/use them
great analogy
also, despite everyone being armed, a shitload of students got killed anyway lol
>>768244045
>bottom right
Come on, bitch, come take my guns armed only with a twig.
>>768244065
Is SpongeBob a book?
>>768244105
You can't argue with stupid, unfortunately
>>768244105
>>768244089
Hogwarts was open for like 600 years before a student died (Moaning Myrtle). What a bunch of assclowns.
>>768244065
>>768243749
>>768243767
>>768243924
>>768243950
>>768244045
>>768244154
>>768243431
sauce on pic related?
>>768242943
Fuck off beta fag.
>>768244210
wait so you're saying you agree that guns should be regulated and only people who have been trained should have them
lol cool
>>768244254
That is literally all they know
Their guy == Harry/Dumbledore
Not their guy == Voldemort
>>768244105
Because there was a fucking war at the school at the end. Your point?
>>768244065
Oh they do read one other book
Black>White
I'd rather suck the superior race's gigantic mammoth sized cock than let you 4chan frog fucking racist losers win any argument. Even if you were gay nobody would fuck you.
>>768244374
>>768244529
The NRA is a Communist Organization
>>768244493
ah yes, nobody died before that lmao
>>768244608
I've seen it all
>>768244529
If its not Harry Potter, its SpongeBob or The Simpsons
>>768244608
Your mom was a communist organization when she sucked everyone's dick equally
>>768244493
My point is the NRA is Voldemort!
Or the Chum Bucket
>>768244745
Speaking of Mom
>>768244646
Like I said. ONE fucking student died since its founding in the 10th century. And she was killed by a basilisk.
>>768244822
Holy fuck we need basilisk control!
>>768244822
hm isnt the conservative snowflake line that you need guns to protect you from the government
>>768244813
Nothing I love more than an active womam
>>768242943
I love the NRA and Mike Pence's hard cock.
>>768244897
But thats not "woke" like the Parkland Teens are
>>768243623
Srsly, kids these days need to read about Iran-Contra and learn just how fucked up it was. (And GHW Bush pardoning everybody was just the icing on the cake - gosh, who would have thought an ex-CIA director would do such a thing?)
>>768244745
Literally
>>768242943
Trump will be kicked out of office soon, OP. We're going to bring them down, and we will start seeing this country becoming more peaceful when their influence is no longer there.
>>768245112
That's fucking awesome.
>>768245068
As long as its something other than Harry Fucking Potter I'm all for it
So who is the Voldemort of Iran-Contra?
>>768245182
I thought this was more creativie
>>768245068
>>768243641
>>768242943
No, they are a money laundry
>>768245308
But thats against the Woke Parkland Teens' narrative!
>>768245320
>>768245184
I'd probably blame John Poindexter and Robert McFarlane the most. Reagan was probably well on his way to dementia at that point.
>>768245184
Probably Caspar Weinburger. Yeah, that's his real fucking name.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caspar_Weinberger
But they all looked to Henry Kissinger for advice.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Kissinger
>>768242943
>>768243950
>without Hermione, Harry would've died in book 1
That's just blatantly untrue
Basically the only thing Hermione did that significantly helped was doing Petrificus Totalus on Neville (which Harry and Ron were perfectly capable of) - and the potion riddle.
See, the thing is though, if Hermione wasn't there, when Harry gets to the potion riddle - he's stuck. He's brave, but he's not stupid enough to drink a random potion in the hopes that it won't kill him. So, Harry is forced to retreat. Dumbledore soon returns, and he comes back to the trap where Voldemort is still stuck at the mirror, and is thus unable to properly defend himself against Dumbledore. He gets trapped forever, and thus is never fully resurrected. The war never happens. Hundreds of people stay alive.
Hermione is literally the reason that the war happened.
>>768245635
By this logic her first amendment is not valid if she typed that. She needs to use a quill pen and hemp paper.
>>768245518
I dunno about Cap, but Kissinger, ugh. I wish someone would destroy Kissinger's horcruces already; he's been a pox on society for far too long.
>>768245690
Okay, switching to Simpsons memes
>>768245635
I wonder if she knows about the Puckle Gun
or the letters where the founding fathers outright state that the citizenry should have access to military-grade weapons because that's the fucking point of the 2nd amendment
Or the letters where they say "yes that includes cannons if you want"
>>768245762
d-do they know that scene was mocking people like them?
>>768242943
>Your mother's pussy is a terrorist organization.
>>768245727
I didn't realize ideas were restricted to parchment and quills.
>>768242943
These libtard nigger faggots and their transparent attempt to "sway" social media always make me laugh.
>>768245771
ooh you got links to them letters? i can always use more resources to back up my (read: the correct) stance
>>768245762
Trump=Krusty the Klown
>>768245811
It's mocking the NRA bought government now. Take that gun nut.
>>768245868
>saving gay nigger porn on computer
k
>>768243950
>>768244479
>>768244608
>>768244881
>>768245356
Hello. I voted for Hillary Clinton and would like to have seen sensible gun control legislation passed by Congress.
>>768245867
I didn't realize "arms" were restricted to muskets
>>768246391
>>768246391
Don't worry anon, I'm sure your parents are fine with having a homosexual son.
>>768245909
>>768245981
>>768246033
>>768246083
Wow. You really got us there. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm going to vote Democrat next election!!!
>>768246572
The wording of the 2nd Amendment reflected what is now obsolete technology.
>>768246616
>Alertsense
Isn't that the company that makes those sleep disorder monitors your mom bought for you?
>>768247036
>>768246679
>I'm going to vote Democrat next election
You'd better you fucking dick
>>768242943
>>768243623
>>768243950
>>768244045
>>768244089
>>768244242
>>768244374
>>768244530
>>768244608
>>768244777
>>768244813
>>768244897
>>768244990
>>768245068
>>768245141
>>768245635
>>768245909
>>768245981
>>768246033
>>768246083
>>768246391
>>768247036
>>768247196
>>768247171
They clearly didn't though. Maybe that was due to pressure from some of the Southern States not to fully define the 2nd as it should have been. But you gun nuts better settle down and let some laws get passed.
>>768247275
>copypasting that many posts
autism
>>768247036
You can break this down legalistically all day. But law and the interpretation of such is complicated.
The issues is that law is partly predicated upon force. You need the ability to enforce the law. Ask yourself- can the government remove guns lawfully owned by 10s of millions of americans?
>>768247275
>>768242943
>>768247337
Oh, you're just pretending to be retarded. Carry on. Careful not to take it too far though. Someone might do the right thing and line you and your family up against a wall and shoot you for pretending to be traitors who don't belong here.
>>768247337
Yet they were machine guns that existed back then... HMMM
>>768244813
>17th century
>19th century
That's not how that works
>>768245635
If we are really going by what the founders intended then I ought to be able to own a fucking artillery. brb checking gunbroker for a M777A2
>>768247337
The puckle gun was around long before the 2nd amendment
Firearms themselves had undergone major revolutions during their own lifetimes
The idea that the founding fathers were incapable of understanding that firearms would become more efficient is like if a modern 50 year old guy was under the impression that cars will never be more advanced than a 1985 impala.
>>768247363
>>768247337
>>768242943
Your daily reminder that the Left wants to disarm women so that Schneiderman and his pals can beat the shit out of you
>>768247157
No, they''re the people who send out AMBER Alerts when children go missing or kidnapped.
Ironic huh?
>>768242943
>>768247337
They intended for the civilian militia (read: every citizen, not a limited militia as people who aren't educated enough to understand what "regulated" means in historical context) to be able to wage war against a standing army should the government become tyrannical. This isn't debatable.
>>768247398
>can the government remove guns lawfully owned by 10s of millions of americans?
Most of that amount would be reduced by gun owners willing to go along with the new law.
You might have 10-20 million left out of that number.
Then you have to determine if all 20 million would band together and fight. I doubt it.
This idea you're going to take up arms against the government is pretty childish, actually.
>>768247505
You're the only one advocating fascism, anon. What does that say about you?
>>768247538
The South pressured the Founding Fathers to keep slavery. They very likely are responsible for the gun faggotry we're seeing today.
>>768247784
Someone has to.
>>768247337
>>768247948
Yeah it actually is. There is literally no language in the 2nd that backs up a single thing you're talking about.
>>768248115
Black people really disturb you, don't they? Are you about 13? I could see that.
>>768247965
>calls things childish
>not able to build paragraphs
You underestimate how much people like to have civil rights and you fail to see how ingrained this one is in the american character.
>>768248191
Don't forget the jews, you kike faggot!
>>768248228
I'm well aware of my civil rights.
You abide by a Constitution as you imagine it to be.
>>768247995
That I'd win because you're a pussy who won't get his hands dirty.
>>768248288
Do you print those out and stick your dick through them?
>>768248144
You're not very good at this.
>>768248335
See, this is why I need government to protect me from people like you.
>>768248329
>>768248387
You said the 2nd is not debatable.
We're doing it right now. So are activists. You then interpreted the 2nd as if you were a judge.
You're clearly not.
The Supreme Court doesn't agree with your interpretation, either.
>>768248329
>I'm well aware of my civil rights.
Work on your reading comprehension.
>>768247965
I wouldn't go so far as to say there would be outright war but logically there could be. Populations are known to revolt when property is taken from them. Now if this property is also has a defensive use and they themselves did nothing to deserve having said property stripped- well it doesn't go over well.
What would happen is all of the legal law abiding citizens would have their guns removed while all the illegal gun owners would not. This would disproportionately effect African American communities.
>>768247965
http://archive.is/qUK8M
>>768248361
>Do you print those out and stick your dick through them?
Notice as the kike realizes that his jew tricks have been discovered and is now attempting to deflect attention from himself.
>>768248484
You're a threat to everyone's civil rights, actually. By your twisted interpretation of what they are. Kind of ironic.
>>768248492
If the Supreme Court overturns Heller and gives the go-ahead on banning arms, you're not going to try anything stupid, are you?
>>768247398
my stepfather is a Fox News watching, Trump voting, vietnam vet fuckin retard gun nut, he hunts every season, does that reloading shit, and he has got 3 gun safes... needed 3 because the first 2 were full. Literally hundreds of guns, idk the exact count.
I am sure he has "over my cold dead hands" kind of ideas, and he was actually out in the jungle killing people and getting shot at as a young man.
the second the government were to threaten to lock him up or even like, fine him or raise his taxes, i have no doubt he'd spread his cheeks and submit, like virtually all gun-owning adults would
that is the thing about living in this country... if you are the kind of person that resorts to violence to accomplish things, you typically wind up locked away somewhere and having your right to firearms revoked.
kinda like these fucking CHUDs that thing all the Trump-lovers would riot if Trump were deposed.... they'd get real mad, yell at their TV, maybe kick the dog or beat their stepkids. but their fat asses will stayed glued to the couch and they will do whatever it takes to ensure they can keep their fat asses glued to the couch for years to come
>>768248083
Did you even read this, you dumb nigger?
>>768246616
The lady who got aught kidnapping children in Haiti for the Clinton's, gets pardoned by Bill then given a job that sends out Alerts when kids get kidnapped.
Makes perfect sense....If you're kidnapping kids and only want Alerts to go out when it isn't your guys doing the kidnapping.
>>768248698
>kinda like these fucking CHUDs that thing all the Trump-lovers would riot if Trump were deposed.... they'd get real mad, yell at their TV, maybe kick the dog or beat their stepkids. but their fat asses will stayed glued to the couch and they will do whatever it takes to ensure they can keep their fat asses glued to the couch for years to come
(You)
Does it give you that big of a thrill to have such an empty, pre-written thread last on /b/ for a few hours?
>>768248674
Do it and see what happens.
>>768248474
>We're doing it right now.
No, I'm presenting you with the way the world exists. I'm not debating, I'm telling. This post isn't a debate either. It's an explanation.
>>768248474
>The Supreme Court doesn't agree with your interpretation, either.
The supreme court is just as susceptible to what's implied by the 2nd as any other branch of a tyrannical government. What they have to say on the matter isn't important, since it coming into play would mean they'd failed their mandate anyway. See how that works, sunshine?
>>768248839
That's not how it works. You would be in direct rebellion to the US Constitution. You would have to respect it.
>>768248391
No one could protect you from me. I'd always find a way to eliminate you. There's nothing a government could do to stop me if I showed no sign of it before coming for you. Sleep tight.
>>768248891
No, actually it means you would take up arms against our government in contempt of the ruling that was handed down.
>sunshine
you underestimate your opposition, actually
this is to our advantage
>>768248958
Do it and see what happens.
>>768248803
what's cum taste like?
>>768248891
>The supreme court is just as susceptible to what's implied by the 2nd as any other branch of a tyrannical government.
>Spending time replying to bait
The idea of "rights" are lost on these people. "Rights" don't exist in their mind. The only thing that exists is the idea of government power and the infallibility of government power.
The government wants to take guns? They probably have a good reason, better let them.
Don't read anything the founders of the US wrote about rights being inalienable, and any entity seeking to violate those rights must be destroyed.
>>768248698
>needed 3 because the first 2 were full. Literally hundreds of guns, idk the exact count.
You're retarded.
>>768249047
Actually, law enforcement has taken down those far worse than the Internet Braggart you want to be here. Easily.
>>768249076
Again, you would be directly in contempt of the Supreme Court.
You would then have to be brought to justice, but I doubt you'd see a courtroom.
>>768248616
>>768249313
So you're Tories. Good to know.
>>768249305
Do it and see what happens.
>I hate guns, have them banned
>I want the police to enforce the gun confiscations
>I hate the police and actively protest them
>>768248958
How much of your salary does your wife's boyfriend permit you to spend on soy?
>>768244663
ahahaha this got me hard
>>768249104
full diapey bud?
>>768249089
>The government wants to take guns? They probably have a good reason, better let them.
>>768248674
Personally no. I am a lawyer and a fan of legalism. To be clear they won't overturn it. You may get grumbles here and there about reform but not an outright ban. It would be political suicide for the left to attempt a ban. But as a lawyer I would fight it legally and through the democratic process
>>768248698
I find that position rather illogical and based on generalization and sterotypes. Keep in mind that a lot of Trump voters are decent middle class people, rich people, veterans, active military, and poor. They would see Trump's impeachment (not depose- wrong word there mate) as a rejection of their voice. If their voice cannot be heard through democratic means it will be heard via other means- primarily force.
This very same thing happened in the Roman Republic keep in mind. You may think that every Trump voter is some fat dumb loser but I promise you that is not the case. The very basis of your position is based on a flawed stereotype. Rethink
>>768249496
You would be held in contempt of the Supreme Court, anon. You aren't the good guy here.
>>768245112
hickock45 mom's a hoe
>>768249069
>No, actually it means you would take up arms against our government
You missed the word "tyrannical" there. It would be a tyrannical government. My opposition is a bunch of faggots who don't have guns hiding behind a government whose military would defect en masse in the event the 1st or 2nd amendments were challenged. You overestimate your position in the grand scheme of things, mostly because you haven't bothered to think anything you say through.
>>768249649
>But as a lawyer I would fight legally and through the democratic process
That's how you do it.
>>768245141
Niggers still run gangs and autistic hillbillies are still gonna own guns, peace my ass
>>768249506
Follow up question:
Did he buy you a Nintendo Switch yet for being such and obedient kike beta cuck?
>>768249305
Assuming you are an American: why do you people get off on the idea of other Americans getting shot? Most of us just want to be left alone.
>>768249649
>But as a lawyer I would fight it legally and through the democratic process
>out kike the kikes
I like it.
>>768249725
>"tyrannical"
interesting that the word is in quotes
you think the government is tyrannical now
I don't.
>>768245519
lel what a stupid shitpost
>>768249886
I'm not in favor of getting people shot, anon. Not sure what kind of glue you're huffing there.
>>768249677
SCOTUS isn't God anon.
>>768242943
The more you respond to this thread the more Shareblue pays the faggot who started it
>>768249177
>implying law enforcement would even know about me, considering I haven't done or said anything illegal and have shown no indication of illegal activity
You have no clue how many people out there could flip the switch without any previous warning.
>>768248550
or muslims have to be___________
>>768249348
>no u
Typical brainlet.
>>768250138
I'm just pointing out your contempt for the very law you claim to uphold.
>>768250011
Do tell what you meant by
>You would then have to be brought to justice, but I doubt you'd see a courtroom.
Are they just writing anon a ticket?
>>768250192
You're right, we don't. That's why we need more laws to address potential problems like you before you hurt someone.
>>768250291
The government didn't give us our freedom of speech or right to bear arms.
They cannot take them away.
>>768242943
>>768243312
Eliminate the problem.
>>768250307
Just assuming--rightly--that anon wouldn't surrender himself to authorities, that he would rather go out in a blaze of glory and die a martyr than face the music.
>>768250394
If guns got banned through the due process of law, you would have to respect that system. Fuck God.
You would be guilty of insurgency against this country and I would support bringing you to justice.
>>768249886
Gun control advocates aren't real Americans. They don't understand the importance of our fundamental rights. They're a threat to the integrity of the republic and should be dealt with as such.
>>768250481
>surrender himself to authorities
Authorities won't enforce those unconstitutional laws.
>>768250556
>you would have to respect that system.
Wrong.
why do i even care about american gun laws?
i don't even live there
so not my kids gettin shot in school
>>768250557
>They don't understand the importance of our fundamental rights.
Rights are whatever you think they are. That's the problem here.
And I'm American and I vote. I want a Democrat in there.
>>768250556
This is exactly how America was created anon, they said no.
>>768250598
Uh, yeah they would, actually.
You would acting against the Constitution. See, again, it's your arrogance. Totally your undoing.
>>768250624
Then enjoy your short time being rebels.
>>768244105
"Wands were highly regulated and only trained people who had studied a long time were allowed to have/use them"
Harry Potter literally didn't know he was a wizard, and 6 hours later, big ass Hagrid took him to Olivander's and he's giving it a wave and blowing the drawers out of Olivander's wall. You sound dumb, fuck head!
>>768250734
>Uh, yeah they would, actually.
Uh, no they wouldn't and have already states they wouldn't.
>>768250771
>Then enjoy your short time being rebels
Are we writing a hypothetical fiction book anon, enjoy someone else's fantasy?
No thanks.
>>768249890
>interesting that the word is in quotes
It's really not. That's how grammar works. Maybe you should be looking into a remedial English class at your closest community college (since I doubt you own a car or have a licence).
>>768250683
You still don't seem to get it.
Guns get banned through legal due process of law. Per the Constitution.
That means the Supreme Court Ruling is Constitutional until it is challenged again, through the legal process.
You do not have the right to take up arms in this scenario, anon.
>>768250793
>states
stated
>>768250793
Nobody has made this kind of pronouncement, stop lying gun nut.
>>768249649
>>>768248698 (You)
>I find that position rather illogical and based on generalization and sterotypes. Keep in mind that a lot of Trump voters are decent middle class people, rich people, veterans, active military, and poor. They would see Trump's impeachment (not depose- wrong word there mate) as a rejection of their voice. If their voice cannot be heard through democratic means it will be heard via other means- primarily force.
>This very same thing happened in the Roman Republic keep in mind. You may think that every Trump voter is some fat dumb loser but I promise you that is not the case. The very basis of your position is based on a flawed stereotype. Rethink
Not a stereotype bud, just reality.
I was friends with a guy that came back from Afghanistan after being forced to enlist to escape drug charges, who came back to Central NY and started doing armed robberies of "spots," places where drug dealers employed ppl to sell crack
Give a crackhead $50 to get a location, go and rob it, walk out with all the money and all the crack. The kid manning the house is just an employee, the second he sees a gun, he gives everything up without a fight
I asked my friend if he was ever scared like, wouldn't the bosses eventually come and kill him or something?
He said he was never afraid of this... they are motivated by money, there is no profit in them coming after him. So long as he isn't a massive annoyance to one particular person, nobody wants to worry about having to deal with an investigation over having murdered a white person.
The types of guys that would go out and beat the shit out of you, or kill someone on principle, they wind up getting locked up as teens, they never get to the level where they have employees.
People are not going to massively do a god damn thing if they are threatened with having their guns taken away. If you don't see this, you watch too much TV.
Maybe a couple weirdos here and there would shoot and kill a single deputy.
>>768250890
>You do not have the right to take up arms in this scenario, anon.
Wanna bet?
>>768250882
Maybe you should stop using the word "tyrannical" to describe the current system as you're doing.
>>768250919
Right...
>>768250481
Didn't you claim everyone would comply earlier? If recent gun control laws are any indication then it's pretty safe to say no one will comply with or enforce them in any meaningful way, and that's assuming you can pass them.
>>768250962
OK, fine. You have two choices:
1. Surrender to the proper authorities
2. Die a martyr
>>768250777
Hahahahaha
