Anyone know the artist?
Also 3d loli thread.
>>767924241
Can anyone explain how having pictures of kids in full clothing can be a bannable offense, but having drawing of kids getting rammed mercilessly is aok?
I'm not judging, just curious.
>>767925099
But it's not okay? it's illegal in almost every country except the usa lul
>>767925099
Because /b/ is scared shitless
>>767925099
Because it's not real.
>>767925483
You got source?
>>767924241
Artists name is imbi.
Pixiv id: 28520849
>>767925546
Why is there so much weird detail in that one?
>>767925483
The only thing that's not going to be real is your life after I'm through with you pedo.
>>767925099
Same way a very detailed picture of a gruesome murder is legal, but actually doing it and documenting it isn't.
>>767925139
>>767925139
>almost every country
Only Canada and nanny European nations.
>>767925592
shit, there's more of his stuff on sankaku than pixiv
>>767925766
you are one six shy of satanic trips, you imposter
enjoy the hemmorhoids your dad gave you.
>>767925604
like the super low resolution wall and couch textures?
>>767925546
Sauce?
this guy might become a legend
>>767927715
>thumb outside your fits
Oh my fucking god.
>>767925099
Punishment for drawing is only one step removed from thoughtcrime.
>>767928830
We already have thought crime. It's called hate speech / hate crime laws.
>>767925099
because then you might aswell ban to fantasize about it because it´s not ok to imagine yourself mercilessly ram a child
>>767925568
arent there webms of this?
>>767925099
3dcg threads get removed all the time
>>767925568
who is this artist already ?
>>767928913
hate speech is free speech protected by the 1st amendment, and not a crime.
hate crime laws, while idiotic, only provide for enhanced penalty for other actual crimes.
in summation, you're dumb.
>>767928913
And yet ironically it's only faggot liberals who think that hate speech and all should actually be crimes. "Hate speech" can't be a crime by the constitution because it violates the first amendment.
>>767929370
Yeah, no... people get punished for hate speech all the time.
you can buy vintage nudist magazines from 40's to the 80's.......they always have the whole family......
>>767929463
yeah, no.
sometimes it's just a convenience to have a law against assholes with megaphones
>>767929530
Sorry, but are you being retarded on purpose? Ever heard of Count Dankula?
>>767929606
what part of "protected by the 1st amendment" made you think i was talking about fucking third world countries?
>>767929606
The UK is a police state that has never in it's hisotry had a law protecting free speech. The UK is a soyboy paradise of safe spaces and no offense zones, which by zones I mean every square inch of the country, including your own home. The UK sucks.
free speech is only protected if it's political and in a public place.
private companies have no obligation to allow content on their platforms that is against the company's rules.
Funny how many people here are pushing for the "1984" angle, as if it's trying to justify their pedo-deviant behavior.
>>767925568
nobody wants to answer who this artist is? Source?
MODSMODSMODS
>>767930085
That's not pulling anything up artist wise...
>>767925099
Because it's not real?
That's like asking why robbing and shooting someone in GTA isn't illegal.
