fuck this asshole
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
fuck this asshole
>>767676126
Fuck you
>>767676126
Let’s dox him. Who he be?
>>767676126
that "asshole" will be your next president
>>767676126
hes right with the things he said on TMZ. so fuck you asshole.
>>767676126
cant wait for this to be like old school bloods vs cripps shit and the niggers kill emselves off faster Leaves us whites to bread with the mexican women!
>>767676455
Black people were willingly slaves? Even a fucking kkk clansmen wouldn't say that shit
>>767676446
i hope he will be. he really has the vision.
>>767676126
>found the nigger
>>767676639
>>767676639
Thats the only thing he said to argue about. its really hard to understand and even if you are forced to be in the position of a slave u can do something against that. but everything apart that i 100% agree with him, and i do not even listen to his music or anything. why is it wrong for a black person to wear trumps hat or meet with the president of the united states? trump isnt racist and i really like the fact a meaningful black person understands that and tries to convince people to believe the same and not what media tells them. also he pointed out that 90% of black people are being killed by blacks and not by whites. still black people tend to put it on whites and make way more drama about a dead black person being killed by a white.
niggers shouldnt be allowed to be celebrity or singers.
Because of them you now see little girls talking like niggers.
this shit is triggering me so hard its like they've fucking ruined our society.
>>767676126
I had less respect for him before he became politically outspoken tbh. Shit I might even give his music a listen now.
>>767677382
i wish hitler would of killed stupid people like u. everyone is allowed to talk the way he wants to unless it is his own fucking opinion. no one cares what triggers u or anything.
>>767676890
What a good kid.
Don't like kanye's music. I mean, him as a producer, he's great. He's produced some of my favourite Hip Hop. Politically, I don't like trump. But at least he's strong enough to speak out and go out against the norm. He is an asshole though.
>>767677566
they allowed to but thats the kind of shit that triggers mass shooters and probably a race war soon
i rly hope we cleanse the world of this trash
>>767677282
Floyd Mayweather has been saying this shit since before the election. others too but he did it when no one did
>>767677566
not unless - but only if* sorry english isnt my native language.
>>767676126
Dragon energy boi. You can't stop free thought. Time to leave Plato's cave.
>>767677382
I guess you could say the same about trailer trash though.
>>767677467
His music is only good because a subset of people don't like him but listen to it anyway so he keeps making money and in turn, keeps making music. Now he's so rich that he could literally do anything and get even richer, just like Trump. So respecting him never mattered to begin with, you just fed into the illusion that your opinion ever mattered to begin with.
>>767677694
ive been saying that shit for years too. it doesnt matter who is saying it tbh. every person with influence should say the truth but there is almost none doing that. i respect kanye for the fact he does and i think its nothing wrong with that. hes not even forcing people to believe exactly what he says he's just trying to get people out of the construct they've put into.
>>767677845
This guy gets it.
>>767677467
808 and heartbreaks is his best album imo
>>767676126
#kanyetesturIQ
we got to get him to take an iq test. i wonder if he's below or above chimp...
>>767677694
also shout outs to floyd doing the same. respect for that nigga too.
>>767678034
it definitly is.
>>767676126
This just in:
>stupid celeb has stupid opinions
>>767677985
true. when I said no one was, obviously I meant influential or famous black dudes but yeah. I feel like Kanye is a bit retarded and he usually does this kinda shit before an album comes out but I think his reasoning aside from just monetary gain are somewhat genuine. gotta remember that he's broke as fuck. anyway it will come out years from now that he was fucked up on some drug or something when he said it. he seemed a bit off. but tl;dr I agree but don't think it's as deep as people are caring to make it seem
>>767676639
Thats not what he said.
If you cant represent the opposing side of an argument correctly, then you're not entitled to an opinion, because you're ignorant on the subject matter.
>>767677845
Taste is subjective, and your opinion means just as little as mine.
>>767678034
Thanks man, I'll check it out
>>767678278
What exactly of the things he said is stupid?
>>767678332
This guy gets it!
>>767678332
Fuck you mean??
He literally said slavery was a choice.
How are we misrepresenting the argument??
>>767678340
It's not an opinion. It's fact. A manipulation of your "subjectivity".
>>767676533
> Leaves us whites to bread with the mexican women!
>to bread with the mexican women!
>bread
When your education system fails you THIS miserably.
Go kill yourself whitey.
>>767678033
>>767678474
Fuck off samefag
>>767678326
i definitly agree that kanye uses it for promotion aswell. but i also agree with him and if truth makes good promotion its a double win imo. also he said it before trump was elected too.
i dont really give a shit about boxing so i didnt know about floyd doing that. but shout outs to him.
>>767678695
>Being THIS much a failure
Time to kill yourself anon. Stop breathing my perfectly good oxygen.
>>767676126
He might be a complete nutter, but he also might just be the messiah.
>>767678332
10000000 points to u sir u get it.
>>767678624
>states blatant opinion as fact
>"b-but that's just ur opinion it doesn't mean anything, ur just a fool playing into his pocket >:c"
>>767676126
you would too, faggot
>>767676374
underrated post
>>767678695
>>767678860
Anon, you got BTFO.
>>767678860
I, too, can into mspaint
>>767678405
why don't you check it out? everything regarding slavery is just straight up dumbassery
>>767679031
That's the screenshot you fucking imbecile.
Please go and fix the mistake your mom made by ending your life.
ITT: concern trolling
Winning! MAGA!
>>767678510
No, he did not. He said hearing about slavery for 400 years was a choice. Focusing in slavery is a choice. And it won't help anybody. But thinking about how to take responsibility for your own future might.
>>767679026
lets dox every single celebrity in the world - who they be? lol.
>>767678332
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWJBWU7asEg&t=206s
maybe my "im fucking insane and off my meds" translator is acting up but im pretty sure thats what he said
>>767678695
>>767678860
>>767679031
>Anon's face when he got BTFO
>>767679092
I, too, can into filenames
>>767679054
i checked it out. i just do not get ur point. i wanted u to tell me what u believe is stupid. i could tell u what i believe is right if u want. i just dont like people calling something stupid if they cant tell me why it is.
>>767676126
Why ? because he tried to free his fellow blacks from the mental victimhood the caged themselves in ?
>>767676268
OP is so ugly he wouldn't even fuck himself.
>>767679265
agree.
What did he do now?
>>767679228
>>767679228
Anon, are you mad because you got BTFO?
>>767676639
>I take news headlines as fact
>>767679222
>>767679029
>>767678860
>>767678758
>samefag gets called out
>doubles down
So you being paid to post or is this just out of boredom?
>inb4 you just change the topic
>>767679228
RIP you
>>767679330
he told the truth but its hard for some people to believe. especially for blacks.
>>767679410
george bush doesnt like black people?
>>767678969
It can be your opinion that facts are opinions, you're entitled to that. Doesn't mean it matters.
>>767679400
>Get shsown proof it wasn't the same person
>Doubles down
>Tries to project
Anon, no wonder you're a failure in every aspect of your life.
>>767676455
Link?
>>767679400
>2k18
>this retarded
>>767679400
No, you got baited. That's all.
Kanye trolls hard. He is /b af
>>767676533
mexican women are fucking disgusting
enjoy bloated whales and manic nagging
>>767679462
>>767679511
just google kanye TMZ it was 2 days ago or something
>>767679622
I ain't watching all that.
>>767679400
>>767679549
>>767679400
>>767679486
>>767679549
>Shown proof time and time again
>Continues to be a failure
Oh anon, when you DO kill yourself, the world is a better place!
>>767679736
u dont gotta watch the 30 min version there is a 12 min version but if u decide not too its fine too.
it's pretty obvious you're just here to push an agenda
>>767676639
consider tihs
django covered this topic really well
>>767680169
How so???
>>767676126
Jenah Jameson
>>767676126
Why?
>>767679400
>>767679400
notice the unusual amount of replies this post got
>>767679400
Newfag gets BTFO'd lmao how will he ever recover?
I'm pretty sure what he said about slavery was in connection with what the old guy from duck dynasty was saying. Not that they willingly came over here to be slaves but that they accepted it and didn't even try to fight it after a time. They became used to having everything provided for them as long as they obeyed. Most people in Hollywood don't have real jobs and they get paid enough to do whatever they want as long as they obey. Kanye doesn't seem to care about that. Neither did Dave Chappelle. That's why the trust fund overlords that pay their slaves to obey got pissed off and had propaganda written claiming that they were both crazy and continue to try and ruin their reputations. Make no mistake, the people who write these articles couldn't care less about equality or racism. They just want to use it for money and political gain. When their puppets act up they get mad.
>>767681389
you mean they had the option all along to call a time out on being property?
Well shit, serves them right then
>>767681607
No, I don't think they did. Like I said, I think what they were both getting at was that slaves became conditioned to accept it and they weren't exactly miserable. They had to follow the rules but I think since they were born into it they dealt with the reality that surrounded them.
Kanye. Making a mess of society, fanning the flames of stupid, creating a greater division, and actively admitting that he doesn't read or doesn't have the eloquence to communicate more effectively. And yet he still opens his mouth.
Man.
>>767682263
If you think about it, he is just one man with his own opinions like me or you. The difference is that the media broadcasts his beliefs and then openly discriminates against him for his political and religious beliefs. (while wailing about unconscious discrimination by a Starbucks employee. They do it for a reason and it has nothing to do with equality.
>>767679194
saving that shit...lol
>>767682880
He is just one man who can give his opinions far more reach than you or I, that is why the media even cares about him. That is why the media would ever choose to "discriminate" against him. And he goes out of his way to be in the media, anyways. Why else is he on Twitter? Why attempt to write a book on Twitter with snippets of non-philosophical philosophizing that's been philosophized to death by other living philosophers you could actively make reference to and work from? Why not write the book itself, then publish? Kanye wants to propel his thoughts and opinions to the world, and he admittedly isn't working to make that work better.
Funnily enough, once upon a time, the media didn't "discriminate" against him as it is "discriminating" against him now. All of this is trite. He has been able to sit down and give lucid enough explanations to his actions. He has been able to explain himself in so far as to what he meant, and not what he said prior to the explanation. It doesn't matter what you're going on about with this entity or that entity, or this side or that side. The media isn't homogenous. Forget the sides. Kanye himself holds a kind of presence in the world that not many other people hold. And he, seemingly, knowingly, is influencing it without any forethought or care. Look at all the controversy, faux headlines and faux outrage alongside genuine backlash, knee-jerk responses, and genuine discussion. Would this have happened if Kanye had just said what he chose to say in greater detail, with greater care, in the first place? No.
Now this is another saga in which people can masturbate all kinds of tangents, rightfully or wrongfully, to death, without actually getting to the meat and potatoes of the problems they purport exist. Now there's another excuse to peddle faulty logic and rhetoric. It never ends.
>>767676639
>willingly slaves
>demand reparations for 5 generations
>permanently play victim
>demand handouts
>vote democrat
>get cucked eternally
>not slaves
>>767677467
Ahead of you anon. Nah, it's still shit.
>>767676126
For real
>>767676639
He was talking about the mindset of blacks in the U.S. they -want- to pretend they are all being held down by the big evil white man. Its time for blacks to move on and stop blaming race for all of their problems.
>>767684067
>implying conditioning isn't a thing
>>767677566
>>767683663
I agree, Kanye is an attention whore and so are all the people in his life. Given his past, I don't see why anyone would be surprised that he rapidly speaks whatever hits his brain and it doesn't always come out politically correct. His "I'm gonna let you finish" statement is a meme for a reason. Still, his opionions are his and if people actually tried to understand what he was saying instead of freaking out for more clicks the world would be just fine with a guy who has his own opinions. People need to accept that others will disagree with them and that is ok. The media is just profiteering off of chaos and human misery. They don't care what he thinks or says either and yet they blast it across the nation. Like school shootings, the media will just make it worse and cause more divide. Your hatred toward Kanye is misplaced in my opinion. It's a free country and he has freedom of speech and the freedom to be an attention whore.
>>767678510
>not past slavery
>current victimhood
Is he wrong though?
>>767684358
No, he's right and the only people actually upset about this are white libcucks. African Americans just need to move on and stop playing and acting like victims.
>>767676533
>bread with the mexican women
>bread
Spicitas are fucking gross. I'm not sure if they're directly above or below niggers. I'm thinking below.
>>767679054
How long you been sleeping? Or are you just an angry lib?
>>767676446
hottest first lady
>>767684306
>He was talking about
and
>He said
are two different things. You can mean all you want. If you can't say it, then you haven't said it.
>>767684335
Freedom of anything is not freedom from criticism or freedom from consequence. Kanye has the power to turn the efforts of the polarizing zeitgeist on its head. He isn't doing that right now. If history was any indication, he won't.
>hatred toward Kanye
I wouldn't call it outright hatred. I don't truly hate the man. But I can say that I might hate the principals that he both acts by and defies in a hypocritical way, or the acts themselves that he perpetrates with some sense of intent.
>>767678637
I like when non whites are racist. Proves how stupid the left is.
like it or not, this man is the last real rockstar.
>we live in a society
>>767681607
>option
>being property
Since they were given rights? Yes, they did. They don't seem to make that choice though.
>>767684707
I agree that you and the press are free to criticize him but unlike you and me, the press is putting a spotlight on it and claiming the moral high ground. They do this to get people to feel discriminated against and to feel like the media is on the side of justice. That way when it comes election time you will be conditioned to listen to them when they say that their politician is a shining warrior of justice and honor. I know you don't want to see it as a war of politics or sides but that is exactly what it is. The liberals are mad that he could sway minorities away from their gold mine that they started with Obama and Hillary. It's all a political play to get more votes.
>>767684310
>didn't imply that at all
When you keep telling yourself your masters are keeping you under foot, you start to believe it, even if it never happened.
>>767684684
>>767684707
Also, my comment about Dave Chappelle... he openly stated that the media was trying to force him into some weird shit. That weird shit is simply a cycle they use to make money. If it's a black guy they apply certain standards that makes more money. When he said he didn't want anything to do with it and refused to dance to their tune, they pulled the same shit on him. I'm surprised the media is stupid enough to try the same tactics on Kanye. Like we forgot Dave Chappelle already. It's just how they are and they don't care who they hurt in the process. Half the people that work for them probably don't even realize they are being used in the ways that they are.
>>767684748
I wasn't aware of this. You made my day anon.
>>767684755
Rebel without a cause?
He’s sucking Trump’s cock now so alt right fags will love him. It’s all about not being sheep to the media and what not.
>>767677282
I don’t think trump is racist because of what the media says
I think trump is racist because of what trump says
>>767685621
>He’s saying what 90% have been saying right now so libs will chimp out as usual. It’s all about basic facts and understanding how damaging, oppressive, and racist the Democratic party is.
ftfy
Honorary nigger
>>767676126
Did you know this nigger only has to score 1100 lower than chinks on his SAT to get into Harvard?
>>767676126
Dis nigga woke AF and ain't nothing y'all can do about it.
>>767685077
>I agree
You don't agree if you are running counter to what I'm addressing in succession. I remember a time where the "media" lauded Kanye for being Kanye.
>They do this to get people to feel discriminated
Can you point me to the media? What is the media? Define the media for me. I don't remember the media being an entity solely set on claming the moral high ground for a particular politician. When was the media about politics?
2016? Really? Remember when the media demonized video games? Do you remember that? Or when they called rap a bad influence? When they praized Kanye for breaking down the numerous social and cultural norms with his early work?
>>767685077
This is why I absolutely am not buying this argument you are making with the "media". There are sides, yes. Society has become more entrenched in politics; I said polarizing zeitgeist a reply ago. I know exactly what you're making reference to. And I refuse, absolutely, to cede only to the idea that I must choose a side gleefully, because they said something bad about someone, too. No. There's merit to what I'm saying beyond an opinion, and it's evident, because right now the so called "media" is doing exactly what you're saying they are doing regarding the moral high ground and intense application of the damning spotlight of manufactured shame, if only to address your premise with the media. In the end, I do not care about the liberals. I do not care about the conservatives. I do not care about the media. That is neither the extent nor the appropriate depth to which I take my analysis. My post, my first reply to you, says everything I have thought to say about this episode in society in brief. And it isn't at all a lone sentence. The political entities don't factor into the concerns I put forwards beyond something akin to scenery.
I'm not solely addressing the sense that Kanye is being vilified by the media today. That's not even the extent of that particular problem. That isn't the point I came forwards with. Truthfully, this is exactly an example of what I said would happen.
>>767683663
>Now this is another saga in which people can masturbate all kinds of tangents
>rightfully or wrongfully
>without actually getting to the meat and potatoes of the problems they purport exist
Talented, in the sense that he’s a commodity like a basketball player, rich and detached, and dumb. Of course being a proud white man I’m glad that he spewed his weed-induced opinion. Niggers: “How do we react to this?” “Ma Kardashian’s!” Nigger-sheeple echosphere. Like rabid, dumb animals, let them fight til death.
People defending a literal nigger on /b/. What a bunch of sheep.
>>767686076
That's fine, my only intention was to spotlight what I consider and serious problem with the media. I don't care what side of politics you want to be on. I'm just saying all of this damaging media is coming from a system that is heavily on the side of one political group. It's obvious what political group Kanye believes in at the moment and so fox news has no need to act like children regarding Kanye. Dave Chappelle had nothing to do with politics. It's just the way the hypocritical liberal media in Hollywood and on the news treats people who don't agree with them. And that is why I brought it up. If you want to separate politics from the media that is fine but I believe the guys who run the media have bullied big business and parts of the government and you can see their influence in cases like this. It's a repeatable cycle that can be easily spotted. I voted neutral last election which is pointless. Still, given the way the media acts, I think it's obvious who pays them and so I will vote against them out of principle until their political party is separated from the media machine.
>>767676126
Why? Because he said something you don't like? Or because you know he was right? Because American slavery lasted about 260 years and has been abolished for nearly 150. If you still believe you are enslaved, which many black people do, then you have chosen that mentality. He wasn't talking about actual slaves. He was talking about the likes of Colin Kaepernick.
>>767686052
I said I agree that you are free to criticize him. I'm not saying it's illegal. If they find a politically correct way of being shady people are ok with accepting it. I don't agree with that. Violent video games were condemned by conservative media. The liberal media praised Kanye because he was black. Now that he has conservative beliefs they hate him.
>>767676126
For anything in particular, or just in general?
Cause if you're pissed about the Trump shit, you're being stupid; Kanye was a contrarian asshole since the beginning.
I'd like to clarify that while Kanye is a charismatic man and a talented artist, the main reason why the liberal media was so much behind him and helped create him was because he was black. Not because they like black people, but because they like to use black celebrities to gain political traction with minorities. It's the same reason they are so mad at him right now. Who cares if he doesn't agree with the liberal politics of the day? They are doing their best to smash him because of the danger he represents to their organization and nothing else.
>>767686590
>coming from a system that is heavily on the side of one political group
>fox news has no need to act like children
>hypocritical liberal media in Hollywood
>hypocritical
>liberal
>media
>until their political party is separated from the media machine
>I think it's obvious who pays them
>picture related
>want to separate politics from the media
Do you know why I do that? Why I separate politics from just about everything it has become enshrined within? Because it returns the power to the things that have been co-opted by the political machine of late. You can have real discussions that don't dance around partisan beliefs or rhetoric, and all the while be aware of why things seems to cycle into this negative cycle of distressing drama and such. Easily spotted, that's what you say about it. Why then would you bring it here? Not only does it address nothing of note, it is worth nothing of note, because it is so easily spotted, that everyone must know about it. Damned be, I do not care about liberals. I did not ask who you voted for or how you voted. I ask for no insight into who's paying who, or who "they" are.
I've already separated the political parties from my life where it matters. But I'm watching a society where that isn't the case, not even from you. So vehemently have you tried to steer this reply chain to politics. And I am fighting to steer it away from that. Why? Look at your reply, look at it. Dave Chappelle had nothing to do with politics. Why is he there, besides your other reply highlighting his exit from the mainstream? When was Dave Chappelle a segway into things relating to Kanye West, his actions, his principles, and the scope of both, besides the damned politics?
>>767687045
>I'm not saying it's illegal
But you are making an effort to present a case where I need to observe more and more of the media to form my perspective. Me and the press, me and the press are free to criticize him. Not just me. Me and the press. Then you tell me I don't want to see it as a war of politics or sides, and that it's this unequivocally, and then you go on about the damned liberals. I don't seem free to avoid that.
>Violent video games were condemned by conservative media
>The liberal media praised Kanye because he was black
>Now that he has conservative beliefs they hate him
Great, so it's been established as to how vacuous the "media" is, despite however it may lean.
>>767687717
Because they are attached and you are ignoring reality because it suits you. It's like trying to separate violence from murder. If you don't see the motivation behind the action then you are blind to reality.
>>767687740
By all means, ignore the media if you can. You are free to do what you want. If you are offended that I have a differant opinion then you then.....don't read it either.
>>767687717
I find it odd that you greentext my fox news comment and leave out the part about Kanye. You also word it so I look hypocritical for pointing out my neutrality politically but have strong dislike from the media of the liberal side of things. Pretending that all of the negative media against Kanye is not from butt hurt liberals and that this is not politically motivated is a joke.
Free yourself from your mind prison. Dickface.
>>767676126
Awww did he hurt your little liberal feelings now that he supports our awesome president? CRY MORE, LIBTARD!! hahahaha.
>>767687962
>>767684707
>Kanye has the power to turn the efforts of the polarizing zeitgeist on its head
I do not see how that is being blind to the reality being suggested. I addressed it. And I treat it as a minor point to the greater part of the argument I was making. That isn't ignorance, I've merely chosen to put more emphasis on a take upon a topic that clearly is interwoven with others. Which did not and does not need to rely on politics to get its ever salient point across. It definitely addresses the spectre of the media, but that isn't at all the body or the concern of any of the points within. It is just so frustrating. This is exactly what Kanye did to Van during the TMZ interview that kicked this all off, and it gives me the greatest of headaches.
>>767688588
If I include
>fox news has no need to act like children regarding Kanye
it doesn't change the effect of why I put in greentext, or why I even put it there. It's clear that a better part of that sentence is worth focusing on than just Kanye, because for a good while, this hasn't even been about Kanye anymore. Fox News is now involved.
>You also word it so I look hypocritical for pointing out my neutrality politically
No. You have gone on about politics for some time, and you chose to bring politics here first. That wasn't my doing. There was no good way to bring that to attention as succinctly or as politely as possible than to greentext, to highlight parts of what you typed verbatim. I edited nothing. And again, you go on to rebuff that you have strong dislike from (for?) the media, or the liberal side of things. Right after you've typed that you intend to spotlight what you consider to be a serious problem with the media. Essentially proselytizing against an argument to no one specific, adding, that you don't care what side of politics I want to be on. Great. I really want to stress how unwarranted that all was.
>>767688588
Here.
>>767682880
Look. The argument was Kanye does things half-cocked and it makes things bad. The reply to that argument, if it was a counter-argument, was that Kanye is a man that gets lambasted by the media for his beliefs. Do the two things really connect? If not, one was a comment, and it should've been construed as such, because what I'm experiencing now is that there's an attempt to suggest something over what I have in a convincing manner using things that, frankly, aren't even in the same vein of affect. This is what makes it enervating. Are you trying to convince me or something, or are we sharing opinions? I'm replying because I was given the impression someone is trying to convince me of something.
>Pretending that all of the negative media against Kanye is not from butt hurt liberals
You are turning it into a partisan problem again. And I've never done that in the entirety of this thread.
>>767676126
Fuck you OP. He's a real memer. Poopy di scoopty
>>767676126
Funny watching liberals cry because someone backs the president makes the election even more enjoyable for me. Love watching liberals still crying over the election. Do you need a safe space. Liberals suck.
>>767689384
Kanye doesn't have the power to do anything without the media. Without it, he would be ignored like you or me.
Including Kanye in my sentence makes a large differance because I am clearly not stating that fox news is behond acting childish. That would make me look like I was standing up for fox news which I am not.
I have gone on about politics and the media because that is the only reason this story is being discussed. All of the negativity about Kanye is a direct result of the media and it is very much politically motivated.
>>767676126
He got you talking about his stupid ass, just like Trump. Ultimate troll, pretty ballsy even if he’s a complete headcase
>>767689557
That may be your argument. My argument is that he is a man like any other and it doesn't matter if you disagree with him. The reason everyone is in such an uproar about him and the things he says is because of the media that is paying for a large negative add campaign against him. It's obvious why but I am done trying to explain myself.
>>767689828
>Kanye doesn't have the power to do anything without the media
Why is why I didn't say that Kanye has the power to do anything without the media.
>he would be ignored like you or me
Which is probably why I took the time to type, "He is just one man who can give his opinions far more reach than you or I".
>I am clearly not stating that fox news is behond acting childish
And the focus of the topic in that sentence is what Fox News is doing. Not Kanye. Fox News, and what it does to Kanye, whether it's childish or not.
>That would make me look like I was standing up for fox news
Would it? I didn't see it that way at all. What you say about someone or something never immediately makes you for or against them. You aren't required to pick a side, you can voice your opinion.
>I have gone on about politics and the media because that is the only reason this story is being discussed
>the only reason
The only reason? Then, why reply to
>>767682263
at all? I don't see any discounting of why it is happening with respect to what you say about media and politics being a cause. I absolutely don't see any discounting of why you say it is happening in any reply I've posted after that post before this one as far as media or political leanings go. I just see less focus on the matter-of-fact why in ways that almost stifle any other salient point beyond media and politics.
>>767690016
>My argument is that he is a man like any other and it doesn't matter if you disagree with him
Great. Fantastic. It's definitely an argument for sure and I can see what it's saying. But this means you may as well have been replying to, and trying to convince someone imaginary. I can't stress enough the incongruity that came from responding to an argument with the diction of a counter-argument, with a whole other argument that doesn't at all address much in the original argument it was seemingly countering.
That's like responding to the assertion that milk does a body good with milk cartons waste ink. Great. But what does the waste of ink have to do with the alleged nutritional value of milk to a body?
>is because of the media that is paying for a large negative add campaign against him
That's not why I'm up in arms arguing on /b/. Remember, I don't care what the media says. I listened to the entirety of everything Kanye has chosen to put himself in following this saga. I listened to him talk about what he calls his "break-through". I've bothered to read his tweets. His tweets. That he authors. I could care less what people say about Kanye, and more about what Kanye says and does himself.
>>767676126
>Hmm...He was behind of it.
>>767676126
haha you faggot americans are so fucking retarded. Once in 1000 years one smart American shows up like Kanye and says something smart and you all chimp out like the goriallas you all are hahaha what a country of retards lmao you deserve to live through slavery in 2018, faggot. If its so hard for you to let go of your ego and understand what Kanye said then you deserve every bit of misery you are putting yourself by your own choice into. die you fucking cancer scam country ahahaha
>>767679407
BAA Soosif
BAA Soosif
BAA Soosif
BAA Soosif
At least that's what it looks like she's saying.
>>767690627
You are saying that this has nothing to do with the media and I am saying that Kanye is nothing without the media.
The focus of my fox news comment was to show that all of the negative media is liberal because Kanye has conservative beliefs.
Stating that fox news does not act childish is clearly taking my words out of context and you twisting it further is going to help with your clear intention.
Kanye making a mess of society and his beliefs are known to you because of the media. The media is making it known to you because of politics.
He can't be an asshole. That's something useful
>>767690941
Bow harder to your queen with your high murder rate, immigrant infestation, failing green policy, and horrible teeth.
>>767690827
I may as well have been replying to an imaginary man because I am right and you don't want to admit it.
Bad analogy bro. I'm saying the ink wasted on the carton of milk is a tool used to inform you. If that tool says milk is shit then you would have an argument. If the media actually did what is was supposed to then it would inform you in an unbiased factual manor. Not what is happening to Mr. West.
>>767677740
No you can't because msm does not sell trailer trash as being appealing. We now have rap music being used to sell pharmaceuticals. We have allowed nig/thug culture to be somehow made palatable and even appealing to a segment of the population. All because nig culture is cheap to sell. .
>>767679194
Eh. First I spent my time listening to the nig. Stream of consciousness. Taken out of context. A bit dumb nig “mixed salad” speak. But I get what he was trying to say. He used a very bad metaphor as an example of “mass societal inprisonment”. Dude should always have a lawyer with him to guide his ramblings.
>>767678969
the colors in that picture soothes my eyes for some reason.
>>767691423
>I am right and you don't want to admit it
Huh. That doesn't sound like an opinion. But, run it by me again. I said you were wrong about... ?
>I'm saying the ink wasted on the carton of milk is a tool used to inform you
Fantastic. That doesn't address my saying that milk contains nutrition. Nor is it at all my analogy, so we're going off the beaten path here. Now the ink on the milk cartons is a tool. Uh?
>If that tool says milk is shit then you would have an argument
Yeah, no. I'll be forthcoming with you. I don't understand what this new analogy is supposed to convey for certain. Break it down for me so there are no ambiguities.
>If the media actually did what is was supposed to then it would inform you in an unbiased factual manor
Weird, huh? What was I saying about the media again?
>>767679194
When the glamorous pussy and money makes you a crazy nigger. Scary.
>>767677566
You're getting that sweet rope to bud.
>>767676126
i mean he's not wrong. there were enough slaves to start a revolt, but they didn't do anything other than sneak away.
>>767692026
You stated that my comments about the media and politics had no place in your argument and that you try to separate them.
If facts are incompatible with your arguement then I suggest you get a new arguemeent.
If you can't see how you were intentionally making it look like I thought fox news doesn't act childishly when I clearly don't and have stated multiple times to clarify then I don't know what to tell you.
You misqouted my words on purpose. You can try to find a PC arguement to wiggle out of it but we both know you are full of it.
I never stated that you were stupid. I was just pointing out that this wall of hatred is bullshit. Thats my opinion. Is it ok with you?
>>767679194
Can’t believe I’m going to type this. Kinda feel bad for the nig. Dumb nig gets reeled in by the greedy jews. “Do what we say dumb nigger and we’ll make you rich and famous.” Dude seems scared and a mess. Not nigger lovin, just human.
>>767676446
go to bed Scott
>>767678510
400 years
hint : it was abolished a long time ago
>>767692073
If you have bothered to argue with me this long without thinking I am wrong then I don't know what to say. It sounds like you are talking in circles because you lost an argument to me.
No you stated that Kanye was causing divide and dramatizing his beliefs in a negative light. That's fine with me but it's no different than stating opinions about milk on a milk carton.
You were saying that the media has nothing to do with sides. That is how it's supposed to be. Too bad you ignore the reality that the media is not acting that way right now. Hence, my fox news comment.
>>767676126
>>767686718
"lol I stabbed you like a month ago, it shouldn't even hurt any more, you gotta free your mind!"
>>767692436
>You stated that my comments about the media and politics had no place in your argument and that you try to separate them
Yes. Not to the degree that I was reading.
>If facts are incompatible with your arguement then I suggest you get a new arguemeent.
Hmm. So, you're saying that the political zeitgeist of today, the kind of body of thought or transient entity that casts harsh spotlights on people who defer from their manufactured norms and moralizing doesn't exist? Because that would be what you're saying, in other words, when you say that facts are incompatible with my argument and imply that I'm not arguing with any factual nature whatsoever.
And you say I'm playing dirty.
>If you can't see how you were intentionally making it look like I thought fox news doesn't act childishly when I clearly don't
It might be because that isn't what happened. It could also be, that you're not being clear enough in your efforts to demonstrate that I did. I don't see any of my replies being dissected. When I get examples of taking things out of context or misrepresenting them, I get truncated quotations and soundbytes that don't convey any thread of what instigated them. Like if you only quote someone on saying
>I like men
and not the full sentence of
>I like men's sports
Twisting someone's words is truly making a strawman out of them. That is, saying they said something that they clearly didn't say. A quotation, maybe, that isn't anything that's ever come out of them. Or a bold misrepresentation of their argument, a kind of red herring and strawman put together, via constructing a quotation from scratch than misconstruing something that even flirts with anything they've associated with or put across. And, honestly, I don't see any of that when I greentexted the very particular moment the subject became Fox News.
>>767692436
>You can try to find a PC arguement
Hey, why does it have to be a PC argument? Why am I a PC guy? What?
>we both know you are full of it
I'm absolutely not doing the dirty here. Looks more like you're doing it what with dropping
>PC
out of the blue like that, alongside suggesting I'm
>full of it
>I never stated that you were stupid
The implications are there. Very strongly. Because now, I'm PC or something.
>this wall of hatred is bullshit
I can attest to that.
>Is it ok with you
It isn't my place to authorize your opinions.
>>767692661
>If you have bothered to argue with me this long without thinking I am wrong
Well, it's not about thinking that you are wrong. It is thinking or seeing that you are doing something that I disagree with. Note, not wrong. Just disagreeable. You can do this. This is something that can be done.
>you stated that Kanye was causing divide and dramatizing his beliefs in a negative light
Ah. I don't think I ever said Kanye was dramatizing his beliefs in a negative light.
>That's fine with me
It's not fine with me if you misquote me after insisting that I misquoted you when I legitimately copied and pasted exact keystrokes you yourself made.
>You were saying that the media has nothing to do with sides
I think it was more nuanced than that. Maybe, quote me. Or re-read something I posted earlier on. I can link to that particular reply too.
>Too bad you ignore the reality that the media is not acting that way right now
Sincerely, I haven't. Not this entire thread. Especially not recently since you are pushing it this hard.
>>767693255
You said that it had nothing to do with the media and you try to separate them, then you said that you don't think you said it has nothing to do with the media.
What I'm saying very clearly is that fox media isn't saying anything negative about Kanye and all of the liberal outlets are. It's obvious and I know you get it.
If I wasn't clear enough in my efforts to state that fox news was not acting childishly TOWARD KANYE and not toward other topics then my bad but I think it was pretty clear.
Yes twisting someone's words is making a strawman out of them. You misquoted them and I called you out on it. Then you tried to twist my words to justify it.
>>767693786
>You said that it had nothing to do with the media and you try to separate them
>You said that it had nothing to do with the media
Show me. Don't tell me that I said a thing. Show me that I did it. Because I know what I typed; I typed it. I thought it. And I pressed enter.
>then you said that you don't think you said it has nothing to do with the media
Well, I don't think I said it has nothing to do with the media. Per the above.
>What I'm saying very clearly is that fox media isn't saying anything negative about Kanye and all of the liberal outlets are
And that point runs unmolested.
>I know you get it
Why were the last few replies what they were, then?
>If I wasn't clear enough in my efforts to state that fox news was not acting childishly TOWARD KANYE and not toward other topics then my bad
You were very clear. It was very clear. Even I got that. I got that the first time around. But I wasn't focusing on the part where Fox News was doing something to Kanye. I was focused on how the focus went to Fox News, doing something, to Kanye. Not, Kanye, doing something. Subtracting elements from the sentence and focusing on the subject is not misrepresenting the sentence when the point is to, you know, point out the subject that you noticed.
>You misquoted them
I want you to, right now, provide examples of misquotation. Then, I want you to provide examples of twisting words, just so I can see what you mean when you say these things. I'm asking, because when you say these things, they mean very different things. To me, and to just about every definition you can find out there that even establishes these concepts.
>>767693283
It's a PC argument when you try to find PC finalities in someone's wording when you knew what they were saying and decided to be difficult for the troll of it.
Right but you implied that I was saying you are stupid when I never said that. You can quote it you know. This board is very transparent. See what I mean? I didn't even say that you were PC I said you were using PC arguments to justify nitpicking my argument that you allegedly have no disagreement with.
So another words you don't like that I am stating my opinion and backing it up with facts because you don't like to include politics or media in your arguments about a man you would know nothing about without politics or media.
No you said he was causing divide and YOU were dramatizing his beliefs in a negative light. Which is fine but it's the equivalent of an opinion on a milk carton.
Na, I'm not going to quote you and make this wall of text even larger. We both know what you said.
Well at least we agree about the media to some extent which was my whole point bro!
Seriously, I've got shit I have to do. I'm off. I hope you don't judge the man to harshly that is what I am thinking. I don't listen to his music and I don't really care what he believes but I clearly got a bone to pick with todays current media structure. If you disagree, it's cool but I got to go.
>>767694309
>It's a PC argument when you try to find PC finalities in someone's wording when you knew what they were saying and decided to be difficult for the troll of it
Okay. I don't think that's what I did. I don't even understand what a PC finality is. Something final that is also PC? Again, why is it PC? Is PC the opposite of... ? What? And I don't know if it should be that you don't argue with conviction in your own premises or with any kind of integrity. If you call that being difficult, well, sorry. But I have points, and for the sake of actually remaining true to them and being consistent, I'm sticking with them until they're actually deconstructed. I'm rationalizing nothing here.
>you implied that I was saying you are stupid
Then I said that it very much seemed like you were saying I was stupid when the only case of my paticipating in this, is that I only know of Kanye's beliefs because of the media (and) the media is making it known to me because of politics. In that, I needed that to be explained to me when that was one of my finishing remarks, in other words. Where I left a scathing review of the media itself. So forgive me if that was perceived as a slap in the face or an insinuation that I hadn't grasped this, and needed it to be repeated to me when I've already said as much, as if I'd never said it before in any fashion. Kind of like explaining to someone how to ride a bike after they've rode a bike up and down the block. Call it patronizing, at best.
>This board is very transparent
And I did quote you, anon. Look closely.
>>767692026
>>Kanye making a mess of society and his beliefs are known to you because of the media
>>The media is making it known to you because of politics
>And apparently I am incapable of free thought and am a ward of the state.
And I can do it again.
>>767691167
>Kanye making a mess of society and his beliefs are known to you because of the media
>The media is making it known to you because of politics
