>Will dispute feminism arguments and Black Lives Matter movement chains
>Believes in god
The very definition of "jogging in place".
He believes in god, so he has to be a feminist and a pro BLM? What's the connection, there?
He attempts to seek out truth and base his arguments off of them. He's also willing to hear your ideas and have an open discussion. Aren't these traits we should all strive for and admire? You can say he's foolish/closed minded for believing in a god, that criticism is fair. Can someone bring up an exact argument he made that was wrong? He literally has hours and hours of videos of him talking and even being challenged and debated by people who don't like him. Shouldn't there be a multiple videos of him being corrected/put in his place if he was such a phoney
sorry, i forgot to post a trigger warning with my comment. pls don't #meToo me.
Carefully selected facts and figures where they agree with his argument, rhetoric when the facts don't agree with him, straight up logical fallacies when he's out of the other two.
He's not always wrong, in fact he's often right in the money, but he argues like a lawyer: opinion first, not a scientist: facts first.
he is not respected by anyone of intellect. the is a sideshow. a twitter hack. his fans are invariably young and ignorant(not necessarily stupid themselves), mistaking his cherrypicked facts for fulsome arguments.
His arguments against abortion have nothing to do with believing in God. They might have to do with Judeo-Christian morals, but many people have the exact same set of morals without believing in God. There are tons of atheists who think abortion is ethically wrong as well. I don't expect to have a legitimate discussion about this on /b/ but you can't just dismiss someone's arguments because they are a theist.