I hear no NRA member standing up to civil forfeiture(5th amendment), I hear no NRA member standing up to terry stops(4th amendment), I hear NRA members crying about not being able to take their guns to states that don't allow it(10th amendment) I hear no NRA member standing up for free press(1st), all I ever hear them say is muh guns.
It's not small details, they are rights that are equally as important as your guns. My point is that they aren't being "civil rights" protectors if they are solely focused on a single issue.
>protecting a civil right doesn't make you a protector of civil rights
Do you have a learning disability? Too black to comprehend what you read? Non-native English speaker? I already addressed your pedantry. Are you here to embarrass gun control advocates? Because that's what you're doing.
Eh, whatever you can keep claiming I'm focusing on small issues, can care less. Civil rights groups focus on multiple issues, not just about having access to tiny penis bang tubes. It is a lobbying group for manufacturers and their products under the guise of "muh right", and nothing more, stop trying to act otherwise.
jesus christ, how fucking retarded are you?
literally most of the nra is focused on one issue because they have no reason or pull in any other issue because cunts like you are calling them terrorists.
>can care less
Learning disability confirmed.
>Civil rights groups focus on multiple issues
Not necessarily. You just pulled that out of your ass. As far as I know, there's no law that says you have to focus on multiple civil rights.
>tiny penis bang tubes
You argue like a feminist. Shameful. Are you a girl? Is that why you're having such a hard time thinking through things?
>It is a lobbying group for manufacturers and their products under the guise of "muh right", and nothing more, stop trying to act otherwise.
That's a very cool misguided opinion you have there.
Protip: People with learning disabilities shouldn't be trying to have rational debates. Enjoy your lifetime of service jobs.
While you're digging for that citation, also bring up how much money they've received from members. It'll be fun to compare them. You have 3 minutes. If you fail to post, you lose and your position on this issue is invalid. Go.
>derp a derp I'm just keep throwing insults and hope to trigger someone
It's not like the tobacco companies didn't do something just like the NRA called the National Smokers Alliance or anything just like it. Furthermore I don't need service jobs when I get money from the government for getting disabled in fallujah.
While that is still part of the organization's core function, today less than half of the NRA's revenues come from program fees and membership dues.
The bulk of the group's money now comes in the form of contributions, grants, royalty income, and advertising, much of it originating from gun industry sources.
Oh so now I offered evidence of the claim, now you want to change to "Oh it's not so bad that it was taken over by corporate interests, they still really care about me and not gun sales". The absolute state of this country has gone to shit.
Again, I fail to see how it's relevant where the money comes from. Speed up your replies please. I don't have all night to call you a retarded child.
>they still really care about me and not gun sales
Do you not see that both benefit from protecting my civil right? So now you hate my civil right AND capitalism which exists to fulfill it. You really don't like freedom, do you?
Yup. That has been scientifically proven.
>pretending not to be the same learning disabled socialist
>doesn't realize I can tell it's him because of his failuere to understand how commas work and how they differ from periods
>pretending not to be the same learning disabled socialist
>same low IQ insults and phonecancer formatting
>hitler lost the war because he invaded russia
>why would you think I use them incorrectly or not at all when I use them in completely incorrectly the wrong places?
You poor piece of trash.
>newfaggot outsider "thinks" you capitalize greentext like you would a real sentence
I remember destroying you in this same argument the other night. Get new material, Parkland survivor/Russian plant.
Except there already is a lobbying group for gun manufacturers: National Shooting Sports Foundation.
I also find it funny that those making fun of penis sizes are afraid of a gun seven year old girls can shoot.
ALL HILLARY VOTERS ARE NAZI AMERICA HATE'IN TERRORISTS
Oh reddit. You're a funny kid.
Nice one, Sergei. Just remember: When my country crushed yours into economic submission at the end of the Cold War, your mother and her sisters had to whore themselves out for loaves of bread.
this potato alien is a terrorist.
There's no use pretending. You've been found out.
Come up with new material and you won't get called on it. Your post was also a deflection because you have no evidence that my grammar was wrong. Imagine what you could've done with your life if you weren't a nigger inside.
>Capitalization rule with sentences after colons: If only one sentence follows the colon, it is often not necessary to capitalize the first word of the new sentence. If two or more sentences follow the colon, capitalize the first word of each sentence following
Image what you could do with your life if you don’t keep crying all the time, and thinking you’re always right.
Work on that reading comprehension, Jamal. The use of "often" means it's not a rule. Typical nigger-brained newfag throwing himself under the bus.
Spacing out your post more than 5 seconds? Looks like I've finally taught you something, monkey.
>acts like a complete pedant earlier
>cries like a bitch when he gets it back
You should've read harder if you didn't want to be embarrassed in public.
You're a nigger no matter how hard you try and pretend to be different people.
>can't even English
You. You may be a different poster. The other guy isn't completely retarded, just mostly retarded.
Yeah, because I corrected myself, totally damaged my credibility. Looks like someone’s mommy is going to have to put him in timeout for getting too emotional. No tendies for you.
I don’t get how many times I have to explain to your forest gump ass, the insults you keep throwing at me doesn’t hide your tears, and quite honestly I’m quite aroused by the thought of some schizophrenic guy crying about some shit said on a Himalayan goat milking website
Not insulting you here. I am new to thread. But do your realize how flawed these ideas are?
You don't like NRA- That is fine. We can all dislike different lobbying groups. Vote on that.
But gun owners do have rights- they are people. They do have the right to own weapons. And they have the right to influence the government along those lines. That's how this works
Not him, but the fact you have people yelling lock her up for those 2 things goes to show we are past the point of a full legal investigation and to the point where accusations are taken as evidence in the court of public opinion.
I mean we as the majority regardless of side. Both sides are set in their thought process of the other side is destroying America, and almost nothing will change their mind. Welcome to tribalism in America
When I referred to mouthbreathers, I was referring to the irrational fucktards, regardless of side. There are plenty of rational people who don't jump to conclusions based on their team's propaganda. It's just that they don't yell about it because they're not as uncivilized as the people who believe in the court of public opinion.
Yes but I feel as if you are underestimating the hyper-partisan society we are living in at the moment. I know there is people who don’t jump to conclusions, but I feel as if it is the minority at the moment. I could absolutely be wrong.
Alinsky's Rules for Radicals
* Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.
* Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people. The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
* Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
* Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. “You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”
* Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
* Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. “If your people aren’t having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.”
* Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.
* Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”
* Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself.
* Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, “Okay, what would you do?”
* Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
I like the way you think anon.
You know, I'm curious about something here. There seem to be a few of
you who have deemed themselves penis experts and I can only assume that
you are one of them seeing as you have made such a post. Since you are
such an aficionado of the penis and the sizes of them when it comes to
the types of firearms that one might or might not own, how exactly do
you determine what the firearm/penis size is? I mean does an average penis
qualify for a .22 single shot rifle or maybe a Derringer handgun and a
bigger wang get you a Red Rider BB gun while a smaller dangle score you a
larger caliber weapon? Or is there some other criteria that you use not
based on size vs caliber but size vs rate of fire? How many penises did you
study to arrive at your determination? Did you consider them while flaccid
or turgid? Was this done in person or were lots of pictures enough for you?
If in person did you hold them or was a good long look enough? One of the
guys I work with is in the market for a new handgun. Perhaps he could send
you a picture of his penis and you could tell him what would work best for
him. Let me know.
>the only guys left who actively defend our right to protect ourselves from terrorists are terrorists
I can't even fit enough question marks in one post to accurately depict my confusion. What the fuck did he actually mean by this?
At least you tried
2nd grade grammar is helpful, anon.