Simple question: is that a dog?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Simple question: is that a dog?
bonus
bonus 2
bonus 3
>>767559086
Couple dogs and a bitch
>>767559338
hilarious
bonus 4
Moar plz tho
it looks an awful lot like a dog is eating her pussy
>>767559320
this is supposed to be vintage? What filter is it?
>>767559086
It's a stuffed toy probably, these sort of photos required holding still for a while, which a real dog wouldn't do
but I’m no expert
>>767559541
That’s a French postcard from the 1800’s, moron. They’re famous photographs.
>>767559581
Yeah maybe. Seems like a pretty risqué fetish for the time considering how little erotica they made at all
bonus 5
MOARRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
were all women back then fat?
>>767560995
fucking hot as hell
>>767559086
Something is off here, exposures that far back would have been minutes.
No way that dog would be able to not get super blurred.
I call bullshit
>>767561043
It was a signal of wealth. Like today you would like to be slim on FB. Back then it was status to be chubby
>>767561370
You realize film existed in the late 1800's?
>>767559692
gringos
>>767559086
No that's just her bush
>>767561370
It's not a real animal. You're right in calling BS there.
As other people have said, you'd need it to remain in the same place for the sake of exposure in order to take a clear photograph.
The rear legs and its arse are completely fat. There'd be some bend if it were real. The same goes for its front legs; not very visible but clearly not bend/arched.
>tl;dr French people were trying too hard to be kinky
>>767559086
> "... is that a dog? " ;
I saw one just like it, last weekend, when I took the family to the local Petting Zoo
..... it only had one dog - and we all agree that it was a shih-tzu.
>>767561095
Goddamn she is cute!
>>767559086
that's a cat mate
>>767561630
I was talking about "exposure", look it up.
>>767561847
You are right, good sir.
Also, her thumb is skewed/blurred for the same reason. But what did people know about that back then, this was the picture your great granddad blew his load to.
I sure see a lot of exposure in these photos
>>767561987
>shit zoo
oooh!
holy shit this is fucking vintage porno
this is so damn cool, thank you OP
>>767562311
Of course she's exposed - she's got no underwear on
>'Hold that boner for 5'
Epic gentlemen
>>767561043
Three women pissing and suspending an egg in the air with their streams of urine. I think I have a new and very specific fetish.
Let's get more early 20th century nudes going!
>>767563362
I can't locate my bleeping vintage folder. Hang on.
>>767563538
Bump
>>767563105
What? Early pre-computer photoshop techniques?
>>767562703
Don't encourage him - he's been looking in threads all day for a post with a dog in it so he can use that
>>767559661
Lmao, they produced porn by the shed load back in those days.
Approximately 5 minutes after the invention of the camera, people were using then to take dirty pics with.
>>767565250
No MTV, YouPorn or PornHub - what else are they going to do
>>767559086
There was a period when antique porn and the rise in taxidermy after/during the late Victorian era overlapped in a weird way.
>>767565575
no shot bro!
>>767561016
Ahhh, good old fashioned back-alley rape
Need more of this vintage porn stuff.
>>767559728
>>767560980
I never knew how much I needed this
>>767559086
Yes, that's Scruffy. He's smelling something good.
>>767559086
>100 year old porn
>shaven
>buttplug
>lez
they were fuckin progressive back then
nowadays everything is niggers in porn
old times were better
Looks like a poodle
>>767563538
Well.....?
>>767561043
that's a shop or its 19th century equivalent.
>>767560980
Ah, the classic gamahuche.
>>767559692
She's wearing a strap-on!
>>767559086
yes.
She's pooping on the doggo.
It was the famous ScatDoggo fetish, back in time.
>>767568958
clearly there's also the SCAT-S-CAT fetish.
Ah, found my vintage folder.
>>767563078
Under rated comment. Surprised theres not a bunch of blurry dicks
Nothing but white butterfaces
>>767569470
>>767568570
>>767568792
being this newfag to not to know how to stage a pic in 2018 making it appear it was taken in 1918
Angela Merkel has one from her younger days floating around the Internet too.
Are these pics from Storyville? There are some epic stories out there about the Mother/Daughter 'packages' that used to go on there
>>767569078
Betty Page
oh, my..
>>767569707
Is that CP?
>>767569969
MODS
Just because it's vintage doesn't mean it's hot
>>767570176
Hind: It's a mod in the picture
Also, just because it's labeled vintage doesn't mean it actually is.
>>767569969
Where's the C and where's the P?
>>767569707
It's absurd to delete that pic
>>767569969
>deleted
The absolute state of /b/
>>767570471
You get perma banned for nearly everything these days...
>>767569789
Sure is...
>>767564831
ya
pretty common back then
e.g. sometimes people had their eyes closed because they would blur from the blink
so it was better for the photographer to paint them on closed lids, instead of having to entirely repaint blurry eyes
also, head and arm holders or clothing with metal rods
>>767566159
ya shit bri!
>>767571091
This picture... eerie... yet - boner stirring
>>767569362
blurred shoop fuckery for 1000$
>>767571119
ye me breh
>>767570823
I'm out, got some Bettie left and some 50's, but I'm bored.
>>767569649
>merkels younger days
i bet color film was not yet invented back then
>>767561060
What in the blue hell is wrong with you?
>>767571263
This was actually one of a set of 10 that was professionally reconstructed
>>767571372
he likes women, what a faggot.
>beaver pelt hats
>>767571373
>professionally reconstructed
you mean
>recover a cum stained 100 year old paper picture so you can see whats on there without wondering what the fuck this ripped piece of whatever is
or
>i'll take a butterface girl and filter her to death so my 80MPixel picture looks like it was done on a macbook wood with purely mechanic drives
>>767571694
hipsters would wear that
>>767571617
He likes jerking it to 100 yr old pics whatever you think you stupid trap loving Subhuman
>>767571797
it's a straight up vanilla pornographic picture, mate. Who gives a shit how old it is?
you're weird.
