Simple question: is that a dog?
it looks an awful lot like a dog is eating her pussy
It's not a real animal. You're right in calling BS there.
As other people have said, you'd need it to remain in the same place for the sake of exposure in order to take a clear photograph.
The rear legs and its arse are completely fat. There'd be some bend if it were real. The same goes for its front legs; not very visible but clearly not bend/arched.
>tl;dr French people were trying too hard to be kinky
> "... is that a dog? " ;
I saw one just like it, last weekend, when I took the family to the local Petting Zoo
..... it only had one dog - and we all agree that it was a shih-tzu.
You are right, good sir.
Also, her thumb is skewed/blurred for the same reason. But what did people know about that back then, this was the picture your great granddad blew his load to.
She's pooping on the doggo.
It was the famous ScatDoggo fetish, back in time.
clearly there's also the SCAT-S-CAT fetish.
being this newfag to not to know how to stage a pic in 2018 making it appear it was taken in 1918
You get perma banned for nearly everything these days...
pretty common back then
e.g. sometimes people had their eyes closed because they would blur from the blink
so it was better for the photographer to paint them on closed lids, instead of having to entirely repaint blurry eyes
also, head and arm holders or clothing with metal rods
>recover a cum stained 100 year old paper picture so you can see whats on there without wondering what the fuck this ripped piece of whatever is
>i'll take a butterface girl and filter her to death so my 80MPixel picture looks like it was done on a macbook wood with purely mechanic drives