Why can't atheists scientifically prove evolution?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Why can't atheists scientifically prove evolution?
wut
>>767360953
fuck off and read a book about evolution, or read darwins publication.
Hell, read ANYTHING thats not retarded.
Mhhh interesting
>>767360953
not even trying anymore.
>>767360953
because Artax
>>767360953
It's proven
also sage
>>767360953
Atheists evolved from apes. That's a scientific fact.
Atheists cannot even explain what evolution is or how it works!
>>767361420
Elon Mutt evolved from a Cockroach. Everyone knows that.
Pfff.. atheists are just a pussies scared of death
>>767362708
I know, they can't even plan their funerals because they can't accept that they're going to die.
>>767360953
Why can't theists scientifically prove the existence of God?
>>767363407
I don't think you atheists fully understand idea of "Hidden God". God needs to be hidden cause other way people would be moral just to go to Heaven, not because they should. Also the greatest troll never admits he is a one. In this case lack of proof can be taken as proof.
>>767360953
Why can't anything about religion be proven?
>>767360953
It proves itself.
>>767363631
That literally is the only reason religious people pretend that they are just and moral. Some of the most hateful and spiteful people I've ever met are religious and actually attribute their hate and spite specifically to their religion
Why can't atheists prove the existence of themselves? The Bible says that EVERYONE knows that God exists, therefore there are no atheists
Checkmate
Is this the new log thread?
>>767363903
"New"?
>>767363631
what a fucking bullshit
>>767363708
Your bigotry proves itself
>>767360953
They can... And have.
Bait much?
>>767364147
But you haven't
>>767363960
You can't prove its wrong :)
>>767363740
Can you prove that ARRRGGHH RELIGIOUS PEOPLE are more violent than atheist ? Statistics aren't on your side cause in atheistic Soviet Union crime rate was higher than in religious USA
>>767364202
Holy shit, atheists look really miserable. It's no wonder, considering what they believe.
>>767360953
it is proven, you can see the results real time, look at viruses, that's why there's a new flu shot every year, the virus evolves
>>767364202
Not the guy you're talking to, but there is a shitton of factors involved when analyzing the causes of crime in countries. Making a division between religious and non-religious is quite short-sighted.
>>767364615
Exactly. Take the Netherlands for example which has a higher percentage of atheists than both Russian and the USA, but a FAR lower crime rate.
>>767360953
>Why can't anti-evolutionists scientifically disprove evolution?
[hint] bcoz inept, uniniformed, uneducated bumpkins.
>>767360953
Fuck off, faggot.
To be fair science doesn't prove anything. It's job is to disprove. You first have a hypothesis then you try to disprove it. Make conditions where the hypothesis doesn't work so you can make one where your hypothesis work for all conditions relating to it. All science does is give the best possible explanation it can based on current knowledge. If God came down to Earth and literally shows he exists then i am sure most decent scientists will take him into account. But seeing as he hasn't most people who require evidence to base their beliefs on will see "evolution" as their best option
Actualy as a person with right-wing beliefs i'm glad that evolution is true because thanks to that i can say that niggers are less developed than normal White people
>>767366167
Haha the ignorance is strong in this one
>>767363631
>In this case lack of proof can be taken as proof.
The greatest logical fallacy in the history of rational thought.
>>767364185
We don't need to. We don't need to constantly supplant your lack of education by posting the same things over and over and over. It's incumbent upon you, as someone that's challenging a mountain of evidence, to make the case against evolution.
>>767366950
Explain me why in this exact case lack of proof can't be taken as proof
>>767367057
You don't know how it works
>>767367065
> this exact case
no case ever can't be proven by lack of proof
>>767367113
>You don't know how it works
so you're saying that evolution doess work, but nobody knows why?
>>767360953
You do realise evolution has in fact been pretty much... Proven?
>>767367065
Short answer: literally any formal training in logic, forensics (in terms of debate) or the scientific principle. Longer answer available if you are unable to use Google (or, if desperate, Bing).
>>767367120
>>767367219
But actually this would make sense. God can't be visible because people would be moral just to go to Heaven, not because they should
>>767367153
You can't explain how it works, yet you claim that it does. You don't know the explanation which, even if it's a lie, would explain evolution. You are aan evolution supremacist who doesn't know why evolution is supposedly true.
>>767367113
>You don't know how it works
Yes, I know how it works. No, I'm not going to re-type the Internet here for your amusement. Take a biology class, like most of us did in high school or college, and then report back.
>>767367268
>But actually this would make sense.
no. just because you say so doesn't make it real
>>767360953
Because religion fundamentalists are too stupid for science. Imagine a child arguing that Santa is real, but in an endless loop, no matter how old they get.
>>767367272
but i do
>>767360953
Why cant your mother scientifically proven she is not a whore?
>>767367272
>>767360953
Who tf is that bitch?
>>767367268
But what does "should" mean?
Is it not backed up by threats of missing out on heaven?
Why couldn't god just be visible and out in the open like a regular person, but just invicible?
The "should" could still exist and it could be spoken directly to us by god.
>>767367065
Go study formal reasoning. If you assume a lack of hypotheses is enough to prove your conclusion, you are basically saying that a empty set of formulas as assumption proves your proposition.
|- "God exists"
(Let alone the fact you haven't defined exactly existence and God itself). This boils down to say that you have "False" as assumption and there is actually a logical rule such as False |- A, where A is any proposition. But then you can also use False |- B, where B = not A, and then nothing makes sense, because you can prove everything and the opposite this way ("inconsistency").
>tl;dr shut the fuck up
It's science job and it is proven, we witnessed evolution since the inception of science a few times
>>767367268
>because people would be moral just to go to Heaven
Well they do. Why do so many people turn to religion when death is near?
>>767367490
You still didn't prove that i'm not right
>>767367268
This is, hands-down, one of the worst theist posits ever. Abrahamic theist doctrine is that "God" actively directed the affairs of man through wars, phenomena (e.g. floods) and prophets - and man (as a group) didn't follow "God's" direction. "God" then ceased most interaction with "his" people; does this look like a recipe for success? Where does is it written in any Abrahamic text that "God" explicitly told "his" people that they were at some point "on their own", relative to the more direct interactions of the past?
Your argument isn't internally consistent within the context of Abrahamic doctrine...which is pretty much the hallmark of most theist debate.
>>767361411
>because Artax
kek this movie probably came out before you were born, gtfo the swamp of sadness
>>767367720
he just did, though, you're just too dense to understand it
>>767367720
>You still didn't prove that i'm not right
You haven't proven that you're correct, and the core of your assertion isn't even consistent with Judeo-Christian dogma, so the burden is on you.
>>767367729
>implying that i belong to any abrahamic religion
Why can't we all stop pretending like any of us know what the fucks going on here and why we exist. Fuck man you plebs just need answers. There are none for you till death
>>767367720
Then explain more clearly what you meant, or tell me which part is wrong. Just saying "nah I'm still right" is not very convincing.
>>767367817
>>implying that i belong to any abrahamic religion
I'm stating that you are, somewhat poorly, forwarding Abrahamic concepts; I have no idea what affiliations you have, if any, but the ideas you're espousing are clearly Abrahamic.
And now you're just being obtuse, and just trolling. I'm out...
>>767367813
Deism is not connected with abrahamic religion
>>767367257
MODS
O
D
S
