What's the problem with normies always making such a big deal about kids + sex? It's like they put on this blindfold and plug their ears at the mere mention of it. Like it does not exist until the words 'pedophile' and 'child molester' are mentioned. Then it's all virtue signaling and mass hysteria.
When I was a kid I was constantly curious about sex. I was always around the back of some place with a girl watching them pee or trying to cop a feel. I was highly sexual from at least the age of 6.
Yet people seem to blank these things out. Like kids can't have any sexual feelings at least until they hit puberty and even then it's frowned upon.
I understand the whole 'protecting your offspring' from predators. The instinct to be protective parents and the parental bond are a given. But the way it is dealt with is fucking ridiculous.
Since it's now bad to be racist or hate on faggots I guess people had to find a new 'boogerman' to focus their fears and failings in life on. Everybody seems to need a 'monster' to fear and hate for some reason. When will people fucking grow up?
>>767360807
We will reign in faggotry soon enough.
You will get what you deserve as well.
>Bullit to second vertebrae
>>767360807
What the heck man, are you really this retarded ?
>>767360919
Present your case or GTFO.
I have no idea if OP is einstein or just s fucking faggot
>>767360807
aren't you fearing them by hating on normies for pedohating?
do not harbor anger for them, they can't help what they are. and you can't help what you are whatever that is. why do you care what normies think. us enlightened know kids are intelligent and it's not wrong if it's a healthy relationship. just let it be anon.
if you hate pedohaters for pedohating you are no better than them
pls anon. open your heart to loli and forgive
>>767361322
I hate that I cannot be open about it and ask for support. If I were to do so I would be fucked for life and all because of hate, ignorance and stupidity.
>>767361492
The only support you need is the loli
You can be open about it but only with your loli gf and other likeminded folk
otherwise we are imposing our ethics on others, even if we are correct
>>767360970
My case being kids may like it as they do with candy, but psychologically its like rape, they dont want you to do that. They feel vulnerable. They dont make a concious decision.
Youre basically raping them(taking advantage of them).
I Im 21 and i taught 17,18 year old girls. I can tell you: i dont know anything about life...
But these kids ? They were smoking, but if you talked to them, you feel as if they are just born into this world and dont have a clue about anything. They are blatantly naive and trusting.
In the moment, they might go with it, what are they supposed to do, youre an adult, they are kids. You know whats good and normal, you have the experience, they trust you.
But if you take this trust and use it to sexually molest kids, you have really hurt them psychologically.
I give you an example:
I was at uni- girls asked me to be in some kind of video or stuff.
I said
>i dont want to get filmed
>ok anon, we only need your voice
>do the thing
>in the end, they film me
>in the moment im too retarded to realize i dont want it and went with it, they basically scammed me.
>thought like whatever in the moment
>afterwards i felt they had used me
I really think about fucking sueing them for taking advantage of me...
If such a minor thing is psychologically this relevant to me, imagine how it is for kids.
My examle illustrates the psychology.
>>767361810
I agree. But that is not my point. My point is the reaction you get from those around you. They all play the same tune to appear like everyone else. Nobody seems to have free thought in front of their peers for fear of being accused of either being a nonce or fucked in the head. You have to tow the company line so to speak. Nobody wants to talk about it logically for fear of the mob. Open discussion (other than to follow the mob mentality) is a no no.
>>767362011
Ok, fair enough.
>>767362011
How many different reactions does there need to be? Well-adjusted people know instinctively that premature exposure to sexualization is injurious, an instinct that has been backed-up by decades of scientific research. The scope of a logical discussion of the topic can pretty much be described as "it's bad" and "people that want to fuck children are broken".
Anything else is simply an attempt to normalize pedophilia, to which most of us will strenuously object.
>>767362810
Because people sperg out instead of dealing with it in a non-frenzied manner. Just because it may be wrong does not mean those that have such urges should be treated like monsters. We are human too. We have wishes and needs. Denying them to us is one thing. Treating us like scum is another.
>>767362972
"Sperg[ing] out" is the appropriate response. And, because of your risk to society, the pariah status that you have is completely appropriate.
Make no mistake - you're broken and a threat to society, so almost any action taken against you is appropriate.
>>767363151
t. edgy incel teenager
>>767363256
>hating pedos is edgy
>>767363392
>I cannot have a conversation about things I do not like without being overly reactionary, aggressive and protective.
>>767360807
>When I was a kid I was constantly curious about sex.
And this is what predators are counting on. They don't care whether you are actually ready for anything beyond a quick "show & tell".
Molesters do it for their own orgasm or mental high, and won't care about the consequences for the kid.
>>767363151
I'm just as much a threat to society as any gun owner. Just because he has a gun doesn't mean he will shoot up a school. Just because i prefer short girls with flat chests doesn't mean i will rape children.
>>767363543
None of what you stated describes his arguments. I'm fine with loli, just dont diddle kids.
>>767361810
I absolutely agree. My mattress and pillows psychologically scarred me while I was humping it as a kid and watching porn.
>>767363705
No he clearly stated that hating pedos is fine which is just as bad as hating on any other thing that is socially unacceptable without dealing with it in a logical and non-reactionary manner. Racism and homosexuality had the same issues and still do to a lesser degree. I am not saying we should be accepting of pedophilia but we need to be accepting that it exists and those that are pedophiles should be allowed basic human rights.
>>767363782
kek,
not sure if strawman or just making fun of me for whatever reason
>>767363920
K, makes since. I thought he was judging pedophiles who acted on urges
>>767364156
I’m just saying kids aren’t as innocent as people want to believe. This is anecdotal, but back when I was a kid, in middle school anyway, we were obsessed with sex; I kept trying to bang my baby sitter, but she wasn’t into it.
Personally, I’m on the side of the fence saying that psychological damage only occurs because we tell people they have damaged psychologically.
>>767361751
who's the artist b/ros?
All that pizza 10-15 years ago came from the Kremlin.
Just so you know!
>mom shamed any sexuality as a child
>now I feel disgusted with myself every time I have sex
>it's a shame as if I'd killed a man
>ruining my mojo
>Can't even masturbate without feeping guilty
If anything, taking away sexuality from children is morally wrong. Thousands of years of evolution tell us to fuck.