What do you think about the Moon Landing?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
What do you think about the Moon Landing?
>>752479367
It was ok I guess.
>>752479367
>>752479806
>>752479367
It never happened its all a lie one of many many cooked up by the Government over the years
>>752479367
>What do you think about the Moon Landing?
Fucking awesome.
>>752480195
Joking?
>>752480195
>It never happened
snort.
>>752479367
>>752480352
>>752480354
It was one small step for a man, and one giant leap for mankind.
>>752480195
No evidence to back up this conspiracy theory
>>752480540
>>752480606
>doesn't believe in reality
>thinks a meme with a quote somehow proves you right
>>752479367
I think it was easier to make a big fucking rocket and send it to the moon than to fake the moon landing with the shit-tier equipment we had at the time.
>>752479367
Happened.
It was pretty cool. Part of me wishes I was around to see it back then.
>>752479367
Fake as hell
>script and directing by Stanley Kubrick
>>752479367
wish the lunar program hadn't ended
as a kid I was promised the chance of living and working on the moon
fucking commies shoulda kept going on their lunar program
>>752480843
This is a myth
>>752480540
>>752480606
and who runs the media? your answer will inform me of whether ur a retard or not
>>752480843
Kubrick is an autist and wouldn't have been able to pull that off back then if he tried.
>>752480884
Do me a favor get back to the cave you mongoloid
>>752480843
>directing by Stanley Kubrick
yes. and because kubrick was a perfectionist, and he demanded to film on location.
>>752481136
kek
>>752481136
hehehe
The space race was a proxy for the ICBM race, and nearly all the steps required to land on the moon were accomplished by the Soviets first. In this situation, how exactly would faking the moon landing work? Like, did the Soviets fake putting Laika into orbit too?
>>752480932
After all, it is logical that he did not do it alone.
>>752479367
nice try fgts
>>752481440
how the mighty have been reduced to just being faggot trolls on facebook and twitter
>>752480606
Including which Orwell books to read (84's anti-communism) and not to read (Down and Out in Paris and London's anti-capitalism)
>>752481569
what do you mean? let's start on good grounds. Photo I posted is Yuri Gagarin, the 1st man in space.
gotto go tho
>>752480884
>>752481136
>>752480932
I hate ignorant people
>>752479367
I don't understand why the fuck they can't go back for at least one more mission so we can have some awesome 4k footage..live streaming etc
>>752481876
Because it never happened in the first place
>>752481876
>>752479367
It’s pretty cool
>>752482003
yes it did
>>752482091
nope sheepy
>>752481876
There's no reason to send humans again. They have orbiters around the moon right now doing plenty of work.
>>752481801
1\10 b8
>>752480656
No evidence to say man ever set foot on the moon just what people thought they saw on tv
>>752482003
No evidence of this myth
>>752481876
>..live streaming etc
it WAS live streamed (to television) for hours on end.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znj7ZtD7gzw
>>752482399
Get back to your shepherd
>>752482749
Not an argument
>>752482166
Well we left mirrors up there and I can take you to a observatory and shine the light back... Or Paralale shadows work too.
Are people really still clinging to that 1970s conspiracy theory? It's dead
>>752481801
you shouldn't hate yourself. learn to appreciate that you have other qualities, even if your not good at thinking.
>>752480843
>>752483262
they want to feel special
>>752482133
you think you are not among sheep because it's cooler to ignore facts and reason? You are still a sheepling, just from a dumber herd...
>>752479540
FPBP
>>752481719
And you are still stuck in low earth orbit .
Definitely fake
Can't believe people are still defending it
>implying NASA even exists
pfft you pleb. everyone knows (((George Soros))) and the lesbian-gay Illuminati collation were aboard a plane preforming a Satanic Ritual called "Oo-lok-atull" with the Obamas, which summoned an ancient demonic force (see Thessalonians 5:19) that exerted a pulsing gay-satan weather wave (similar to HAARP) 12 times (see Deuteronomy 102:31) until everyone in the US except true Christians and those who bought SUPER ALPHA SUPPLEMENTS™ from the InfoWars store became gay, liberal, and anti-gun. At this point Air Force One landed in the Middle East and Obama personally met with the reanimated corpse of Aleister Crowley so they could convert to Islam under the shadow of the Sphinx and then meet with the Muslim-Reptilian space overlords to discuss plans to spread chemicals in the skies around Flat Earth using commercial aircraft. Once the chemicals have been evenly dispersed in 2018 and everyone on Earth except TRUE CHRISTIANS and Alex Jones is a gay Luciferian-Muslim cultist, God will return with righteous rage to kill everyone on February 1 (Hitler's Secret Second Birthday and Black History Month, coincidence?) using fire and brimstone to rain righteous judgement from the sky while saving a select 144,000 people who never stopped loving Jesus. At this point Big Foot himself will collect the souls of the damned on an ancient vessel designed by the DMT Machine Elves and ferry them into the pits of Hell for rejecting Christ in their hearts. And take a guess what the name of that boat was? 666. Which if you turn upside down is 999. WOKE.
NASA isn't even REAL, PEOPLE!
>>752484854
>>752484854
Where is your evidence?
>>752479367
Pity the program was a one-off cold war political stunt.
>>752480843
Who is this
>>752485296
>>752481440
He тpoгaй Гaгapинa. Пизды пoлyчишь cyкa
>>752480843
>>752485296
They wore boots over the space suits. They are called overboots
>>752485868
yes here they are
>>752486004
my moms cousin worked for nasa in the 70s and put one of those glove fingers up his bum.
>>752483182
>>752486244
No not good enough. Explain how the shadows work. Explain how we can get lasers to return from the moon without mirrors.
>>752485296
>believing that's his real suit
The real one is in the house of some rich and powerful clan/group
I think they happened--the equipment places (like the mirror to bounce lasers) is hard to "fake" and the fact the Russians didn't deny they happened when they'd have the coup of the century and everything to gain by claiming so, seems to add evidence.
However, the "moon shot" itself was PR bullshit. Basically, the Russians beat the US at every milestone that actually mattered (1st man, 1st man in orbit, space stations, satellites, etc--all the useful stuff we still do today) so, the US kept shifting the goalposts until they found something space race related they could do 1st--the moonshot. So, they hyped the hell out of it as if it mattered more than everything the Russians achieved. Apollo was more of an exercise in marketing than actually beating the Russians in any useful way.
Sort of like losing at Hockey at every Olympics, then hyping the hell out of the 1 time you manage to win a game even though you keep losing afterwards...
>>752486349
How do you know how any of what you say is true ?
>>752486392
>>752486600
Um the shadows are easy. look at the images. All the shadows are Parallel to each other. That is impossible without computer editing.
As for the mirror, in 6th grade I saw it in action
>>752480195
Nasa should have gone there and told nobody then you fucknuggets would apescream that secretly nasa went to the moon. You just need to unearth the opposite of what is beeing told to you no matter how dumb it is.
the truth is out there
This threads getting a lot of attention for something that isn't debateable...
>>752480195
Why? Answer that simple question with a realistic, coherent answer and maybe I'll listen to you. Why would they fake it?
If they did, you are talking about thousands of people worldwide that are in on the conspiracy, and not a single one has ever come forth.
We live in a time when everyone i looking for their 15 minutes of fame, when every one is wanting to bring down the mighty, where no one can keep a secret. But every single person involved in this insanely complicated, expensive, and intricate hoax has remained silent.
>>752479367
Apollo 11, 12, aamd 14-17 happened as NASA claims
but 18 was not scrapped
the movie was a semi-fictionalized account of what really happened and was made to gauge the population's reaction to the truth
>>752486004
oops
>>752486831
Show us the pics then
>>752486600
Logic. Common Sense. Reasoning skills. Not being a gullible douchebag...
>>752487605
>>752488206
Show us some pics then or some info thats not bs
>>752487205
Notice no responses to this.
>>752488331
No one is showing anything o prove otherwise
>>752487205
People have a need to believe in all types of conspiracy bullshit.
There's a reason Alex Jones is so popular with crazy people.
From a flat Earth to 911 to JFK's assassination to religion to a secret society of shape shifting lizard overlords straight out of the old TV show V.
The idiot class loves a good conspiracy.
>>752488023
https://youtu.be/zhp-FTYSGe8 How about a video
>>752488330
You want me to show you pictures of something every human being with access to a television saw when it happened.
You want pictures of things that anyone can access, at any time. Things that are in public museums. Verified recordings on hundreds, if not thousands of websites. Interviews with the people who were there. Thousands of scientists, astronauts, and workers involved in a space race involving the 2 countries that were capable at the time...
You are the gullible douchebag challenging mountains of evidence with none of your own. Go get some actual facts and proof to support your lame ass bullshit story and maybe I'll listen to you.
>>752488653
Best one I ever heard of was that Argentina sank the Invincible during the Falklands war, then the British covered it up by pretending another CV was Invincible until a replacement could be built in secret in the US.
The poster was a butt hurt Argie that couldn't handle losing a war to the UK so they invented this elaborate conspiracy theory as a way to save face..
>>752488417
Why do I have to show you facts you can see with your own eyes with virtually no effort on your part?
You are challenging reality. Show me why what we have been told is wrong, or go back to jerking off in your mommas basement.
>>752488653
I get it. Everyone thinks they're half baked, non-researched, drug induced hallucinations are reality.
This is good practice for dealing with these gullible morons in real life though. These idiots are out there.
>>752488953
wait
how does that nullify the fact that Argie lost the Falklands to the UK?
so what if the war was started under false pretenses
it still happened, and they still got their ass kicked
>>752489625
It doesn't. The poster was a conspiracy nutjob that went to great lengths to basically say "we got our licks in" during the war.
He just couldn't handle how badly they got their asses kicked.
What was really funny was his explanation to what happened to all the international reporters on board Invincible and why their countries didn't make a fuss if they were (allegedly) killed in the sinking.
The guy was both bat-shit and butt-hurt, to a hysterical degree and couldn't understand that maybe, just maybe, his country's military performance sucked and they lost, completely.
The moon thing isn't really that complicated:
>Our governments realized there is some kind of "alien" activity on the moon.
>We raced the Russians there to try and make contact.
>The "aliens" watched from spaceships, but didn't contact us.
>We looked at some structures that we found in the moon, but not much happened.
>We stopped going there.
>NASA censored most of the photos and videos, edited them to remove anomalous UFOs and structures, and such.
>Conspiracy people assumed the word photos and video were because it never happened.
Done.
So... To sum up this thread:
>Moron makes statement that goes against mountains of evidence.
>Moron insults anyone that believes facts.
>Moron provides not one shred of proof to back his idiotic claim.
That about right?
It's gotten to the point where it's hard to tell the trolls from the genuinely delusional.
>>752490846
if the US landed on the moon then why are there 6 French flags on the Moon and not a single US flag?
>>752480540
But anon... that meme is also media
>>752490992
because they were gonna open a theme park?
>>752481136
>>752491098
Six Flags Over Luna
>>752481801
>unable to comprehend different opinions
>calls others ignorant
Wew lad
>>752479367
>be spaceguys
>wasstes moneys
>fly to moon
>land
>be go home
>rofffit
>be mon
>be in space
>get landed
>spaceguys leaves trash on mmoon
>no pofit
>still trashees
>>752490992
Because you are an insatiable cum guzzler.
>>752479367
That using 1/3rd of my cellphone's power you could get people to the Moon but now it seems impossible is pretty suspicious.
>>752479367
it doesnt matter what i think
youre a government shill if you dont agree
>>752491289
>didn't get the joke
murifat?
>>752482749
>holds YouTube videos as absolute authority
>calls others sheep
Why are you conspiracy fags so full of yourselves?
>>752491355
Almost like technology changes in 50 years
>>752486731
"uh uh look at me! I'm illustrious! I'm smarter than everyone else! These sheeple are dumb and think they matter and that their vote counts"
>>752485181
Nice
>>752491230
If a statement or belief goes against facts, it is not an opinion, it is a delusion.
>opinion: creamy peanut butter is better than chunky
>delusion: The Earth is flat, the moon landing was a hoax, etc...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
I know it's true, I tried with friends and it worked.
>>752487205
>Why would they fake it?
Really? you're asking this? The US was in the middle of an ideological/military/economical war with Russia. The benefits of being seen as the superior empire and conqueror with the best technology, minds, education, funding, etc was huge. Hell even in chess championships both governments intervened to beat one another and prove superiority. You can't possibly be oblivious to such a thing anon?
>>752491518
No such thing as lasers
>>752491393
I got the joke, and yes I am a murifat.
>>752491412
THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM!!!!!
>>752488653
>to JFK's assassination
This ones dumb, Jfk was playing nice with like dozens of countries that the CIA wanted to overthrow for various reasons and also wasn't playing nice with a lot of the establishment so they killed him. There's plenty of evidence for it
If they could fake this I'm pretty sure they could fake the Moon landing
>>752491609
thx mate
>>752491571
And you think if superiority was faked, it wouldn't be blasted to the rest of the world, thereby causing the faker to lose?
Come on, get real. If it as faked, Russia would have been all over it. Instead, not one single official cry of "fake" anywhere in the world.
Use your head.
>>752491496
Yes and facts must have an empirical basis in reality while the fake moon landing conspiracy
is a stupid hypothesis
>>752491673
ayyylmao seriously though dat shit is reals
>>752491673
>>752491905
Funny how you post that guy cos MIB is real
>>752479367
don't trust the bitch in room 237
>>752491673
>yfw over 50% of america believes in the ayys actively visiting and influencing earth
>>752491782
Yep.
>>752491966
why she was hot
>>752491975
Shut up reptile. We know your ways
>>752491975
>yfw over 50% of america believes angels exist
you think its the same 50% or is the stupid spread over almost the entire population?
>>752481136
>>752491355
Who said it's impossible? No one has said it's impossible, just that it's not economically feasible. There's no call for it, no public push like there was in the 50's and 60's. The only thing keeping us from manned exploration of the solar system is money.
>>752492265
Hard to say, a lot of angel believers say aliens are demons but a lot of irreligious people believe in the ayys too so I'd say there's a spread with a solid overlapping
>>752479367
They faked a bunch of footage in case it failed, but they pulled it off anyway
>>752491940
no we are not
>>752479367
>>752480195
would have been harder to fake it. Mainly the lighting, the perfectly parallel shadows would be impossible without a wall of laser lights, which would have cost me than the american gdp of the time, and 400,000 people would be expected to keep the secret.
>>752492876
not an argument.
>>752492876
>Mainly the lighting, the perfectly parallel shadows would be impossible without a wall of laser lights
>Bitch actually buys this and thinks its hard to tilt a sun lamp
>>752482749
what people say when they actually have no argument left and simply refuse facts.
>>752493078
>ba'aahhh
>>752493013
You try that. Wouldn't make the parallel shadows.
they would point out from the light source in a "V" shape.
also yes, i'm aware i'm arguing with trolls, but i don't really care.
I was on the moon as it happened. Can confirm they went there. Don't do drugs.
>>752493170
pics or it didn't happen.
>>752493134
not that other guy, but doing that isnt THAT hard. basically this. if your budget was "fake the moon landing" this was probably within the realm of plausibility. i think the moon landing happened, just saying parrelel light isnt that hard.
you know those privacy screens you can get for computer monitors? just that, one a larger scale
>>752493363
Those privacy screen didn't exist yet, so doesn't really work.
And any other light would diffuse too much for the shadows to have hard edges, because of the atmosphere.
>>752493363
No. In your instance there would be either multiple shadows or no shadows at all.
>>752493497
>>752493363
whoops, had the wrong date for the filters, but still -
>>752493514
>>752493497
they used this on army trucks in the 1940`s, it did. its literally just metal sheets lined up in both directions. just take this idea and make it much, much larger. if we assume its really fake and they paid off a fuckload of people and suppressed this for THAT long,making this would of been pocket change
>>752493514
?
The "Moon Landing was Faked" is a classic intelligence Double Cover. The first cover is the fake story that it was fake to hide that is actually happened that in turn covers we did go there but everything found and did on the moon has yet to come public. Also, there was some scary shit that forced us not to return. Neil Armstrong knew a lot but took his lifetime secrecy oath to his grave.
![E7E48BF829356BF5E6AE4D2F2575674A7EC4109E[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/L9BgY5X.jpg "E7E48BF829356BF5E6AE4D2F2575674A7EC4109E[1].jpg")
>>752493895
ay fuckin men
>>752479367
we faked it, hoping that noone would find out.
then 50 years of no man on the moon, yay!
(thanks, China, for being so chink; thanks, India, for being so pajeet and Designated).
now, if Russians actually land on the Moon, they will find out that the so-called landing site was no more than a badly crashed unmanned aircraft -- no US flag or rover or whatever.
fun fact, recently we gave ourselves the right to mine the Moon, in spite of any past and future international treaties.
and everything happened while hoping that the Yellowstone caldera doesn't go allah akbar boom boom.
>>752493726
Light coming through the slits still spreads out once it has passed through them. The source of the light would remain hidden, but shadows would either be over lapping from multiple sources of light (stand midway between two streetlights at night, you will have 2 shadows), or virtually no shadow because the light sources were close enough together to overlap, cancelling out the shadows created by each other.
A single source of light from a great distance away would produce normal daytime shadows (the sun). A single light source from nearby would produce much different shadow shapes/effects. Multiple light sources from close by would either overlap shadows, or the different light sources would cancel out shadows.
This should have been explained to you in science class.
>>752494109
you may want to take a seat
theres this thing
some really advanced thing
just invented like
this year
called
a
telescope
>>752491518
lasers brought there later by unmanned mission that couldn't die of radiation in the Van Allen belt
>>752494188
Be careful introducing facts here. This may cause them to go violent.
>>752494188
fake and gay.
no telescope gave us yet a reasonable resolution picture of the so-called landing site.
fun fact: the Hubble is able to spot the alleged flag, and yet never did.
>>752491763
hey I was just telling you the reason why they would have wanted to fake it not that it was fake. You asked.
But anyways, maybe Russia faked their space voyages too and they reached a non-disclosure agreement after the space race was over
>>752479540
lost
>>752494270
short version of space exploration history:
Russia hid facts, US made up stories.
>>752494261
protip: the flag isnt the ONLY piece of evidence on the moon
>>752494237
Because that is so much more plausible and probable.
The manned missions were faked, then later unmanned missions were used to plant manufactured evidence to support the faked manned missions.
And not one single person talked about it.
>>752494375
this is why I added "and rover and whatever", faggot
>>752492328
it's supposed to be impossible because of the van allen belts. they are seven layers of million volt electricity. the space station is well within them. life is not supposed to be able to pass through them. a ship might, without getting fried, but no lifeforms.
>>752494406
oh right, right next to the evidence it was faked, i can see it now
>>752494380
>later unmanned missions were used to plant manufactured evidence
you don't need to tinfoil so hard - you just need to restate relevant facts.
pic related: you.
the biggest telling factor that it happened is that russia hasnt pointed out it didnt happened at all, in anyway way
>>752494270
Again, the one faking it would have lost. There is no sense in that.
So, the non-disclosure agreement survived the fall of communism and a total upheaval of the Russian government. That makes sense. I mean, it's not like they would have a reason to make us look stupid...
>>752494543
russian dosent exist and the worlds flat, prove me wrong
Most of Russia space explorers just died without getting recorded in our history books.
Except a few cases - for example when two Italian amateur radio dudes spotted the first Russian female astronaut dying while getting an astounding level of radiation poisoning. She flew before Gagarin.
>>752494261
You might want to check your facts.
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=WcwfWqP0FMOD_Qb58aGgDw&q=telescope+lunar+landing+site&oq=telescope+lunar+landing+site&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i22i30k1l6.1170.15966.0.16331.31.27.1.2.2.0.129.2788.7j20.27.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..1.30.2821.0..0j0i131k1j0i10k1j0i22i10i30k1j0i8i13i30k1.0.dVYn04mhnq0
http://hubblesite.org/news_release/news/1999-14
>>752480195
People forget this happened at the height of the cold war. America had agents in the Russian space program and the Russians had agents working for NASA. If they faked it they would have been exposed.
>>752494692
>Except a few cases - for example when two Italian amateur radio dudes spotted the first Russian female astronaut dying while getting an astounding level of radiation poisoning. She flew before Gagarin.
That is nothing compared to what American and British Signal Intelligence has recorded and buried in vaults. I just hope someone is maintaining the magnetic tape. Someday, this will surface.
>>752479367
The race to get a man in space (100-400 miles) had a success rate (from launch) of around 30% USA and 7% USSR.
The race to get a man on the moon (350,000 miles) had a success rate of 100% USA
Clearly 100% is not only highly unlikely, it's the definition of impossible.
Now I don't care about shadows, though they are clearly all different, I would just say that it is highly unlikely man has landed on the moon.
>it's also good to point out that the space race was bankrupting both the USSR and USA and the public's faith in the ideologies of capitalism and communism were waning. It needed to end for both countries.
>I'd never speak about this with family or friends because it's been put up there with the 6 million figure and cave dwellers dong 9/11. The media have painted dissent as ignorance and antagonistic.
watch this.
there is a lame warped copy on youtube but you can find better at like solarmovie or viooz.
>>752494884
this is about how kubrick faked the moon landing.
>>752494644
how is the moon round and rises and sets when the earth is flat? check mate atheists
>>752479367
The famous Apollo moon first landing was fake. The other moon landings weren't. The USA needed a victory in the space race. The Soviets were beating the USA in absolutely all other firsts in the space race. The stuff the Soviets beat the USA in are technologies still used today, the lunar landing is nothing but bragging rights.
>>752494916
lmao havent you watched any batman shows, its a spotlight. double check mate roundies
>>752494808
i can tell its a photoshop by the pixels and seeing many photoshops in my time
>>752494449
Supposed to be and is are often two completely different things.
"The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners.[31] The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them. Apollo flight trajectories bypassed the inner belts completely, and only passed through the thinner areas of the outer belts.[25][32]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt
10 seconds of typing puts you on the path to correct answers. A couple questions to a qualified science teacher or scientist is another way.
>>752491673
HAHAHAHA
>>752494873
thats why ford redesign the focus every year from scratch rather improve from previous years model. 100% success from turning the ignition key highly unlikely
US has quite a solid tradition of making up Official Stories for you ameritards - then, 50 to 100 yeras later, the truth comes out but noone of you gives a fuck anymore.
"Hurr Durr, Japs rekt us at Pearl Harbour! let's nuke them!" -- then you find out that it was a literal self-harm needed to lure Japan into something that was planned to escalate up to nukes.
"Hurr Durr, le 11/9 Terrorists mailed Anthrax to two Deputies of le Senate, let's start the Patriot Act!" -- then the story literally disappears from the media, as soon as the anthrax gets analyzed and recognized as "military grade and Made in USA".
"Hurr Durr, Saddam has Le Chemical Mass Weapons of Le Mortal Destruction!" -- then you find out that...
"Hurr Durr, a solo killer killed our $RANDOMPRESIDENT!" -- then 50 years later...
>>752494808
>posts a couple of links and labels them "facts"
sorry, bro, I can't see neither a rover nor a flag or other alleged safely landed human artifact from 1969-1972.
please doublecheck your alleged "facts" before entering the "We actually safely literally landed on the Moon" cospiracy.
>>752494873
Your numbers are not even close to being correct.
>>752495174
Then correct me. Please
My stats come from when launch begins. That's 100% for the moon. ZERO DEATHS
>2 guys died in training
>>752494692
>Except a few cases - for example when two Italian amateur radio dudes spotted the first Russian female astronaut dying while getting an astounding level of radiation poisoning. She flew before Gagarin.
My fav space race story is the "Hawaiian Cosmonaut."
Story goes it was one of the first Soyuz flights after the Russian phased out the Vostok capsules. The new prototype Soyuz was supposed to re-enter and land in Siberia. The angle into the atmosphere was wrong and the capsule skipped over the upper atmosphere like a flat stone over a water pond. The poor cosmonaut ended up entering in the west pacific in the middle of a US Navy war games. Both sides thought the capsule was a "wildcard" to see how they reacted.
To the fleets' surprised it was a real Russian cosmonaut WAY of course. The Russian is brought to Pearl Harbor for debriefing. He is rigid and is acting like a prisoner of war. Navy Intelligence breaks him down with the oddest favor ... pineapple juice. This guy never tasted it and loved it. They also provided him with Vodka.
When he realized the American's were not poisoning him, the great American tradition of cocktails started and the Hawaiian Cosmonaut was born (half pineapple juice, half vodka served on the rock or as a chilled shot.) A few months later, he was return to the Russian via a checkpoint at the Berlin Wall in exchange for some West German and American spies. Order a Hawaiian Cosmonaut anywhere in Hawaii and ask for the story about the drink
>>752494873
i flipped a coin right now and guessed it would be heads. my success rate is 50% but i was right, so my guess rate was 100%
wew learn statistics
>>752479540
Kek
>>752495123
Time for a new tinfoil hat.
A link to a Google search aabout telecope pictures of lunar landing site and the official Hubble site listing the reason why there is no picture of landing sites is in every way relevant to your dim witted, un-researched, and flat out idiotic statements.
You can sit there and demand whatever you want to dipshit. That doesn't mean you're going to get it. Again, you are the one stating that a proven, factual, checkable event did not happen. Show your proof and the world will take you seriously. Until then, you're just another random nutjob.
>>752479367
it's been proven by China Japan and India because surprise! other countries with space programs are able to go check.
The videos clearly shows the dust behaving like it's in a vacuum.
you can read all the transcripts from the missions and i'm sure the US government included all the poop accidents to make themselves look better when they faked it right?
The porn that was sent on a few of the missions was included to make America look better right? NASA was like "we are going to fake it, so we better send porn and make a lot of poop accidents and make the astronauts talk about farting in their space suits because that will show the Soviets America is best"
Legit, its all so stupid.
But conspiracy retards will believe whatever Youtube tells them to without question because conspiracy theorists are brainwashed sheep.
You can't argue with them. They are wrong, boom problem solved, just ignore them, why waste time talking to people who are veritably incorrect?
The biggest arguments against the moon landing all require you don't understand science at all
>the van allan radiation belts
the radiation belts are made of charged electrons and protons and are easily blocked by Aluminum. they also completely missed the inner belt and only passed through the thin edge of the outer belt spending very little time in the belt.
You literally get more radiation ex poser on a transatlantic flight than they did from the radiation belts.
>the flag
was not waving in the wind
>not stars!
you clearly have 0 concept how cameras work or what contrast is
>The earth is flat
funny meme you don't legit believe
>why can't we go back?
no one has built a manned rated rocket to go to the moon since the 70s, spacecraft and rockets are purpose built for 1 or a few specific jobs not all in one you retard.
>you can see stuff reflected or in the background
A lot of those are camera artifacts or literally Photoshoped in by trolls to troll conspiracy retards
It's so dumb
>>752480606
>tells people media brainwashes them and others are sheep
>believes everything youtube and memes tells them without question
fuck off you retarded conspiracy sheep
>>752495495
what the fuck
where did that giant pile of shit come from, exactly?
>>752495395
No,
I'm empirical data to see the success rates of the space programs.
>It's objective no guesswork or emotions
>people on 4chan actually believe that people on 4chan actually believe the moon landings were faked
Y'all posting in a troll thread.
>>752495281
First off, define your numbers. The wording is intentionally vague. Does succes mean they launched the first time they were scheduled, or does it mean that they blew up either on the launch pad r shortly thereafter?
>>752495495
the biggest thing is this
>>752494873
the statistical impossibility
>>752495675
You clearly dont understand statistics.
>Inb4 Hurr durr No U. 100% Impossibru
Well. We did it. So the evidence would suggest something is wrong on YOUR end. Not ours.
>>752495571
Facts are piles of shite now?
>>752495610
dont need to guess work it. they only tried once, and they succeeded once.
dosent matter if your odds of succeeding were literally hoops in my dick. you only try once, and succeed once...its 100%
>>752481876
Affirmative action, quality control.
And, we exhausted our supply of unobtanium.
>>752479367
The moon cant exist because the earth is flat and NASA is just a cover for the ubergovernment that controls the media and the sciences and all other outlets of information
>>752495640
I mean that as of launch sequence they did not get to space. We are talking about manned missions.
If we talk about the race to put a satellite in space the stats are pretty similar if not worse depending on how you look at it.
However deaths are deaths and the 100% success rate of astronaut survival is just clearly impossible and also impossible to explain away logically without some assole trying to make it seem as though you are interpreting them in a non objective way
>I don't care about any of this but I love stats
stats don't lie
>>752495571
How are you this retarded?
It would have been harder and more expensive to fake the moon landing then to actualy go to the moon
>>752495745
statistics follow patterns. When they don't there is a reason. There is a force at work, and often especially in the stock market it's called manipulation and in politics and finance it's called corruption.
You can give no reason for your stance and refuse to acknowledge the facts as clear as they are.
You've obviously come here to feel intelligent and talk down to others
Who has the cigarette butt in lunar footprint picture?
>bitches don’t know bout smokin on da set
>>752495785
They repeatedly visited the moon
NOT ONCE
Every time the pilots returned safely
>>752496150
oh no no one has ever flipped a coin and gotten heads 10 times in a row
>>752495892
So you are counting launches that were scrubbed before actual lift off. That is the only way to arrive at the statistics you quoted. Otherwise, 3 of every 10 astronauts would have died on launches. If this is the case, name them please. Early astronauts were celebrities. I'm sure their deaths would have been huge news.
And then you switch to 100% survival rate for lunar missions, launches.
You may love stats, but you have no idea on how to use them.
>>752496104
It doesn't matter what your perceived probability of success was. This is the literal job of NASA engineers. You think they sat in their fancy little desks all day going "Well, the odds are 1:3,203,480,506.8, but lets just send the fucker anyways."? No. They sat their figur8ng out how to improve the odds. Testing the equipment. Prototyping. Double and triple checking at every step. The mirrors are there. With a powerful enough telescope, you can literally see the evidence yourself, but since you percieve the probabilities to be impossible, you declare it never even happened. You're the idiot here. Not the people throwing solid arguments and evidence at you while you comeback with fucking memes and baseless assertions.
>>752479367
>What do you think about the Moon Landing?
not possible without the help of germans.
>>752496328
Figuring*
Obviously.
>>752496150
That is correct. There was a near disaster on 13, but of the 6 actual landings and 1 failed attempt, all astronauts made it safely back to Earth.
What is your point?
We travelled there and, like any typical American, we left our trash behind for others to see.
>>752494188
>>752494252
this is a bad argument. would need a telescope with a lens as big as a football stadium to see the landing site from earth.
I also 100% believe we landed on the moon several times when we said we did.
>>752494261
>be scientist
>control hubble
>know for a fact whether or not we landed on the moon
>waste time convincing water heads by pointing the telescope at the moon.
>be dummy conspiracy theorist
>use the lack of evidence as evidence to support their shitty theory
dudetheycouldjustpointhubbleatthemoon.jpg
for the record, hubble, like the telescopes on earth, could not take a close enough picture of the landing site either.
"No, Hubble cannot take photos of the Apollo landing sites.
An object on the Moon 4 meters (4.37 yards) across, viewed from HST, would be about 0.002 arcsec in size. The highest resolution instrument currently on HST is the Advanced Camera for Surveys at 0.03 arcsec. So anything we left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any HST image. It would just appear as a dot. "
>>752496743
Thanks for the backup, but we've been down this road, and apparently that is a fake, random website that is not to trusted. Or something like that.
Be prepared to get a headache.
>>752479367
Didnt hapen
>>752496925
if i remember correctly, you can calculate the resolution of a telescope and confirm these numbers.
>>752488785
>>>752488023
>https://youtu.be/zhp-FTYSGe8 How about a video
This kills the retarded
>>752496260
Still waiting.
>>752496743
>this is a bad argument. would need a telescope with a lens as big as a football stadium to see the landing site from earth.
yeah, right, theres absolutely no countries or states or fucking anyone who could afford this and hold a grudge against the states who would find it a fucking boon to prove this wrong in any way whatsoever.
literally none at all
>>752496743
>>752496925
Now address the mirrors, jackasses.
>>752497136
Yep. However, you are introducing facts into the equation again. Mr Tinfoil Hat wants whatever proof he demands, whether it is possible or not.
>>752497181
There are telescopes this big. RADIO TELESCOPES.
OPTICAL telescopes are a different story. The largest optical telescope has a mirror of 126 feet in diameter, quite a bit smaller than would be necessary to provide the resolution Mr Tinfoil Hat demands.
Again, 10 seconds of typing to put you on the right path for answers...
>>752497222
What about them am I supposed to be addressing?
>>752497528
and
its fucking pocket change for most nations with a hard on for fuck you america. most countries spend more on toilet paper
>>752497181
rofl wat
>>752496391
>not possible without the help of germans.
such as von Braun and the other Paperclip refugees?
>>752497776
the hubble cost 1.5 billion. india spent 22 billion on installing toilets it wasnt sure about anyone even using. fucking pocket change
>>752497181
You realize you are scoffing at the idea that no one has built a telescope 2, 3, or more times larger than the biggest one ever built,, simply to prove that the most widely witnessed event in human history (to that point) had not happened.
You want someone to spend an insane amount of time, money, and resources to prove something that almost every one in the world saw did not happen...
That makes sense.
>>752497729
So the fact that no one has done it to prove it didn't happen means that there is no point trying to prove it didn't happen, BECAUSE EVERYONE SAW IT HAPPEN YOU DUMB FUCK.
This is going by your own logic.
>>752497939
>fact check this for 2 and a half seconds
>the "third of five"
>take it further
>largest telescopes
>control + f hub
>zero results
>total time of indepth, intense, highly paid research
>roughly 9 seconds
>>752497901
so the fact that no one has done it means there is no reason to do it. Otherwise this pocket change would have been spent and it would have been disproved. So you're defeating your own argument.
>>752498132
>literally seconds after pointing out multiple nations, many of them enemies with eachother have done so
>>752489063
>>752498162
>>752498132
i mean lets ignore at this point this is over 100,000 people so far all in on a conspiracy and no one but tinfoil wants to talk about it
>>752498074
What are you on and why aren't you sharing? It must be some damn good shit, because you made no sense whatsoever here. None. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
>>752495330
>>752498316
>why wont you link me things that dont exist
gee. because no major nation with a grudge, and but budget to prove the united states...has ever? let me just pull up this non-existent information
>>752495495
I love these pics they prove nothing 12 year old could do a better job on paint brush
>>752498180
Nice try, but no. Lies and made up bullshit unsupported by any facts or even common sense do not induce cognitive dissonance.
You are claiming something revolutionary, something totally against what everyone knows to be the truth.
You want people to believe you? Provide proof. Otherwise you're just a nutjob.
Not one single shred of proof has been presented that the moon landings were faked. Not one. Therefore, you are insanely gullible to believe it.
>>752498389
Still not making a damn bit of sense.
Continue though. This is almost as good as the old "I accidentally the whole thing" thread.
>>752498468
And yet you provide not one single shred of proof to support your claim.
>>752498643
>im fucking retarded, thats my evidence that your wrong
>>752498759
That sounds about right.
>>752498819
amen.
>he thinks he can pass this off as me and not him
lmao
Sounds like the cover up is more work than just sending a guy to the Moon.
It's clearly a hoax, are you telling me those suits are 100% air tight, i don't think cotton weave is gonna keep air from evacuating your bowels as you are shitting yourself in zero g. You can believe all you want but that mother fucker should have just wore a garbage bag with how faked this is.
>>752479367
Best thing America has ever done.
>>752479367
Has anything been learned from Apollo?
http://aulis.com/moonbase2015.htm
>>752498180
Your argument here boils down to “you don’t believe me, it MUST be cognitive dissonance!” I don’t think I need to explain why that’s flawed logic.
>>752495473
>Show your proof
Yet again the usual plebbit tinfoilry at its peak: you're asking for "proof" of a moonlanding that is not confirmed - not even hinted - by the pics posted by yourself.
>>752495495
>>752495495
>believe whatever Youtube tells
The most you have to show, till now, forty-fucking-eight years after the alleged moonlanding, are dots and arrows that do not prove anything.
C'mon, dude. It's only 240k miles away from the Hubble super telescope. Can't you get more convincing "proof" than a few larger-than-your-penis dots?
The fact that Youtube is filled with faggots does not imply the truth is the exact opposite of what they claim.
>>752496743
>>be scientist
aka: you probably know what it means traversing the absurdly high radiation area out there
>>control hubble
aka: you're not a scientis but a politician
>>know for a fact whether or not we landed on the moon
aka: you also know what kind of career if go public
>>waste time convincing water heads by pointing the telescope at the moon.
then why those pics can neither confirm or negate?
>>752479367
No shadow on the flag or pole
>>752479367
Let’s say it did happen, they went to the moon in that tin can of a ship with minimal tech compared to today. We haven’t been back since? Why not, as history goes any new land is usually gobbled up as a commodity and used for some purpose even if the reason isn’t instantly evident. And the bit that gets me is that if you can make it to the moon why fake space walks (we all seen the YouTube vid with the prominent head in the background at a supposed launch from a shuttle) and why create false moments in space if we are there already, or can get there easily? I saw the fakest rocket launch ever from some vid in the 80s, it’s fuckin shameful!! Why do the astronauts on Apollo cover the window to give the effect they are further away? Too many questions left unanswered in my eyes.
>>752501827
https://youtu.be/p-3v8H-YAio
>>752479367
Waste of money and resources.
>>752486004
boom
>>752487101
Thats perfect !
>>752498528
>facts
>proof
Where are your Facts & Proof ?
Yes I am claiming something revolutionary, something totally against what everyone knows to be the truth. YES because alot of the propaganda that everyone has been taught since they where a child is a LIE!
>>752480195
>he Government
Have you noticed that Da Gobermint had an enemy for many you years who never once claimed the moon landings were fake.
USSR not telling on USA is proof it is all REAL.
>>752486004
obvious fakes made later to cover up the mistake.
Boom
>>752479367
Lizard people, the Illuminati, the Government, the Clinton emails, the Earth is flat, alien abductions are real etc. etc.
>>752480843
>script and directing by Stanley Kubrick
like your mom
hey was the kerbel space program faked to?
>>752505149
sorry to redpill you, but KSP is only a game, and does not simulate all of the real physics involved in the gameplay
Wow. 268 posters.
I watched the Apollo 11 moon landings live. I was allowed to stay up late and we watched the footage, listened to the audio. We saw the rocket blast off, we were up at 4am when NA first stepped onto the moon. This went on for about 3-4 weeks to my recollection, the best bit was staying up til 5 in the morning, my dad woke me up when they stepped out of the lander.
I might have been 7-8 years old at the time.
AFAIK I watched Apollo 14,15,16 as well.
All that effort. All that money. All that win. Y'all can fuck off with your stupid conspiracy theories.
>>752498042
the transmissions on television are all that remains. NASA didn't manage to actually keep any video recordings of landing on another globe; they officially "taped over" them.
look it up.
why would NASA tape over it all unless it wasn't real science and just some bullshit to convince the stupid world? there are NO truly high quality videos in existence.
>>752505593
>and we watched the footage
Congrats for being Yet Another TV Shows Watcher.
The emotion induced by the fiction made you feel it was absurdly real shit happening.
When Russians will establish their first Moonbase in a few years, JewTVs will make us cry at fakenews-fakenews.
But when Chinks will do the same and demonstrate no trace of any artifact (rovers, flags, whatever), what will we shout?
>>752505722
I work in audio engineering and "recording over" things is completely common.
Having worked with magnetic tape for the vast majority of my career, we knew the tape had a short shelf life. We didn't anticipate the need to go back to recordings that had gone to hard drives, DAT tapes, ZIP discs or any of the other things that had been thrown at us.
Long-term media storage wasn't a thing. Objectively we are no more sure that hard disc storage is going to last as long as 24-track magnetic tape has.
We just assumed storage was short-term, vinyl or later on, cassette copies of things would be all that was needed, and just did not understand why you would want to back things up.
It took years to discover that tape demagnetised and rotted. When CDs came out we assumed they were infinite life.
Solid state storage is too young to even be evaluated at this time.
I agree that perhaps NASA, or the BBC, should have looked forward more, but you won't understand the culture of film reel and tape reel unless you lived it.
You cut and spliced, and the tapes were an intermediary product. Masters were stored on only 2- or 4-track tape and they were the only thing that was kept. Tracking/filming tape was used and discarded.
>>752505921
14yo basement dweller: the post
Honestly man. My generation watched for years the failed missions, the deaths, the building of test models, the entire thing was documented. The fact the documents don't exist anymore is pretty irrelevant.
Human history has never been good at keeping documentary evidence. But what is more true, is that stupid people love a good conspiracy theory.
What a waste of your time on this earth.
>>752480932
Bruh have you even seen 2001?
