s/fur
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
s/fur
did some practice here yesterday, post something for me to copy or make a request, single character only
>>752395565
Draw a stronk tigress doing squats.
How do you know when you've been lurking s/fur/ too long.
Just dug through my fur downloads folder and found threads from 2013.
The ride truly never ends
Pic related first ever image I downloaded from a fur thread.
>>752395950
You've been here too long when fur posting becomes your priority. Been here since Feb 2012.
>>752395950
>1376347202681.jpg
Monday, August 12, 2013 3:40:02.681 PM
to be precise. I have a script that downloads any thread that has the word "s/fur" in the OP. I may have gone too far.
>>752396091
How many dupes you end up with?
Not to mention all the hetty posting that used to happen in these threads.
>>752395686
this is what i came up with, hope you like it!
>>752396577
Bretty gud. Thanks, anon.
>>752396373
Not a lot since I store files by their md5 sum. deduplication happens automatically.
> $ du -abch 4chan/ | tail -n 1
> 1.8T total
So, alot.
>>752395377
KILL YOURSELF! OOOHH YEAAAAAH!
>>752396091
>I have a script that downloads any thread that has the word "s/fur" in the OP. I may have gone too far.
That probably is too far. How big is your folder now?
I wrote a thread fetcher to download these threads, but don't really use it much anymore. It's easier to find what I want on image booru sites.
>>752396728
>>752396794
1.8Tb. wat.
>>752396794
See: >>752396728
About 1.8 Terabytes
>>752396916
I saw. That's all deduplicated?
>>752396954
>I saw. That's all deduplicated?
right now it only deduplicates across a single board. It scrapes >>>/trash/ too. Also, I keep revisisions of the thread text so I can find where pics were deleted. At 1-2 MB per pic, it gets big pretty fast.
>>752396728
Doing gods work
When did you start downloading?
>>752397043
Are you only removing exact duplicates? There's often a lot of images with the same content with a different res or quality.
With that many images, have you considered lossless jpeg & png optimisers?
>>752395565
This is great art.
Requesting a character inviting anon on her lap.
https://youtu.be/72kis_9r8Yc?t=300
I'm curious about this clip where the face is hidden. Do you think they were aware of gateway furrying kids back then so they hid the face or are we to assume that it was a human Goofy gets a boner for.
>>752397325
sure, any preference?
>>752397415
Time stamp is 5 mins
>>752397200
Around 2011? I scraped threads manually for a long time
>>752397279
Yeah. A lot of times people upload a jpg version of something, so the md5 sum doesn't match. I have more advanced algorithm for finding dupes, but it requires manual intervention since it isn't exact. It uses signal processing.
Like I said, probably too far.
>>752397429
Anything motherly, pudgy female character with a sweater perhaps.
ok so someone said this mare was urinating, I believe it to be arousal, whats your opinion?
>>752397638
Water bender
>>752397638
squash soup looks different than piss. That looks like piss.
>>752396915
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
LEAVE HER OUT OF THIS
MNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
MY CHILDHOOD
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>752397469
I wrote an algorithm that compares the histograms of images for that. It does a good job of finding near duplicates. It lists them for me and I can decide what I don't want to keep.
Image optimisation usually saves 10-20% of space, and it can get some pics under 2mb for here on /b/.
I only have ~21,000 pics. I'm slowly going through it and getting rid of things I don't like because even what I have is a lot to manage.
>>752397638
Considering that it's coming out in a stream just above her clit, definitely pee. Which is hot too.
>>752397847
i always assumed it was like when a mare is on heat which is kinda a mixture of both but i don't mind peeing so long as it's not on me
>>752397905
>peeing so long as it's not on me
But that's the best part!
>>752397501
here she is, hope you like!
>>752397815
>I wrote an algorithm that compares the histograms of images for that. It does a good job of finding near duplicates. It lists them for me and I can decide what I don't want to keep.
That's cool, how do you store the histograms? I used a 2d cosine transform and then compared if components were above or below average
>Image optimisation usually saves 10-20% of space, and it can get some pics under 2mb for here on /b/.
Yeah, the tricky thing is then there are two md5 sums (since the file is now different).
>I only have ~21,000 pics. I'm slowly going through it and getting rid of things I don't like because even what I have is a lot to manage.
That's why having a lot is helpful. One day I'll correlate pics I like with the others in the thread. That way If other threads have duplicates of things I like, I can quickly cross reference them. For example:
I see thread A and like pic A1. If Thread B, which I haven't seen also has A1, then pics B1, B2, and B3 may be more interesting to me. (since pics in a thread are usually upload by a few people, who hopefully have similar tastes).
One day...
>>752397952
Get back to work, Trump.
>>752397952
How is she drinking carbonated pee? How do you carbonate it?
>>752398146
Thanks for the request fill! See you around, adios
>>752398187
That's probably not pee, but that would be really hot.
>>752397952
That's not how those glasses work...
>>752398370
Welcome to furry art.
Hey, Gears.
Hey degenerates, I have a question. Where do I find more fur porn? Specifically, cubs.
thanks
Anyone know how to contact the stairsync guy?
>>752398494
e621.net
inkbunny.net
>>752398166
>That's cool, how do you store the histograms?
In an xml database file, so they they can be quickly referenced. Generating them is kinda slow.
I was considering looking into using an edge detection algorithm to find duplicates, because I have a few 'duplicate' images where one is coloured in, and the other is just the raw sketch. I think that would allow me to find those kind of duplicates.
>Yeah, the tricky thing is then there are two md5 sums (since the file is now different).
I store MD5 checksums too, but mine are generated from the image data, rather than the image file. So a jpeg and a png file could store the same exact image data, and as a result have the same checksum. Optimising images in my case has no effect on the checksum, because optimisation is lossless.
>That's why having a lot is helpful. One day I'll correlate pics I like with the others in the thread. That way If other threads have duplicates of things I like, I can quickly cross reference them.
I never store the actual thread, only the images.
>>752398494
>Where do I find more fur porn?
e621 or an imageboard named after a german submarine.
>Specifically, cubs.
inkbunny, or e621 with the 'young' tag.
>>752398548
>>752398402
PLS STOP
>>752398424
greetings
>>752398713
no
>>752398838
pls stob
>>752398891
she loves cock
>>752399086
NO SHE DOESNT
PLS NOE MORE
>>752399178
>>752399249
>>752398615
> I was considering looking into using an edge detection algorithm to find duplicates, because I have a few 'duplicate' images where one is coloured in, and the other is just the raw sketch. I think that would allow me to find those kind of duplicates.
Edges can work, but you need to store them some how, and it breaks down if the image is cropped.
> I store MD5 checksums too, but mine are generated from the image data, rather than the image file. So a jpeg and a png file could store the same exact image data, and as a result have the same checksum. Optimising images in my case has no effect on the checksum, because optimisation is lossless.
imagemagic does this too, but it changed to using a different algorithm in later versions. (using spatial Moments of the brightness and chroma channels?)
> I never store the actual thread, only the images.
At some point I noticed the most racy (and interesting) pics were the ones mods delete. If you have a copy of the original thread, you can find that out retrospectively. You can also find what pics tend to get the most replies.
Also, sorry for nerding up this thread.
Already bought Christmas presents?
>>752399485
what a bed wetter
>>752399414
>Edges can work, but you need to store them some how, and it breaks down if the image is cropped.
Never intended to store the result. Just wanted to use it as an alternative way to find duplicates. Even if it's slow it shouldn't matter because I won't use it often.
>At some point I noticed the most racy (and interesting) pics were the ones mods delete. If you have a copy of the original thread, you can find that out retrospectively. You can also find what pics tend to get the most replies.
Do you have any way of searching your collection for these pics currently?
>>752399550
Nerd stuff is good. And no, since I don't know what anyone wants. If they don't make it known, they get nothing. I'm not going to guess, and waste money on something that someone doesn't want.
>>752399710
Yeah, when I scrape the thread I parse the json and then look for posts that have changed. If the post is completely gone, i re serialize my copy back into a special file called deleted.js.gz
>>752399796
If you do the white elephant thing, you can still get something. I bought fidget spinners so I can see the looks on their face.
Also your pic is like furception
>>752399848
I meant for the images that have the most replies and such. My thread fetcher doesn't really care. It just grabs the webpage every 30 seconds and downloads every file posted in the thread. Never thought to do anything more. If the image isn't to my tastes it gets deleted, so for me it wouldn't really matter if it was removed by a mod/user if the image itself was of low quality.
>>752395565
Night.
>>752400671
Night, Dash.
There are 270 pages of this, before this?>>752401203
>>752401456
Well, yeah.
Asd
>>752398559
What do you need?
>>752402644
?
>>752402656
To report his TLS setup is broken.
Compare:
http://stairsync.org/
https://stairsync.org/
Both Firefox and Chrome explain why, though they give two different reasons. Either way, it could be fixed.
>>752402760
The first reply was an accident, hit enter by mistake. Anyway, I'll pass it on to him, though he's been MIA for a good few months now so idk if it'll actually reach him.
>>752401456
Where can I find them?
>>752402871
I see. Thank you. Does he have a name?
It's also broken for https://www.stairsync.org/ too, with the www.
>been MIA for a good few months now
I sadly know that feel. Thanks though, Tordenbrak!
>>752402940
his name's just stairs, he used to be a gfur poster till he dropped off the board
>>752403157
Ahh, okay. That does happen to a lot of people, huh.
>>752402760
lol that was broken for AGES.
Don't even remember for how long.
looks like from 2015. LOL
>>752403384
I also noticed the year 2015, too. He should switch to letsencrypt, probably.
>>752402929
Don't know. It's old, I have no links.
And it appears I don't have it locally for some reason...
bump
