What does /b/ think about A Shit Pai?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
What does /b/ think about A Shit Pai?
telecom shill giving them what they want, regardless of the best interest of the consumers. IT's pretty easy.
He needs to be publicly executed along with all his immediate family. Nothing will ever change in the USA's government if a message isn't sent that there are consequences for being corrupt and serving in a public position. The ancients handled this sort of thing the right way.
>>752253214
correct!
I think he is a repulsive price of shit individual. However, he is clever enough to sway the old fogie dumb asses in the FCC, with bullshit speeches that literally contradict everything he is proposing. "We believe in a free and open internet" and as such we should give all that control to the major network providers that will force us to pay fines and dictate what we post and watch... Wtf is free and open about?that
>>752252463
He needs to be dragged out in the street and shot, then doused in piss and set on fire in front of his family.Greedy piece of shit
>>752252463
Go to /pol/ and thank all those retards who think they wont be replaced and who voted for prez Gump for this.
this place will be the first affected by it, gook moot cant afford new shoes let alone to pay for faster service.
https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/7fq8uw/supreme_red_pill_comprehensive_breakdown_of_the/
>>752252463
Conservatives love him for some retarded reason.
>>752252463
Back India. This fucker shouldn’t be in charge of shit in the USA. He should be scamming people or whatever Pajeets do.
>>752252463
He's secretly our guy. When net neutrality is gone the the sites that will get throttled the most is LGBT sites. He's trying to save us from faggotry.
>>752253562
Conservatives are retarded so it makes sense.
>>752253604
You’re dumb. Kys. Jews will be in full control. Who owns all the big outlets and internet services? JEWS. Jews who are regressive.
>>752253562
He got rid of TPP, put a good justice on the Supreme Court, he's not politically correct, actually loves our military, and is doing a lot of good for the country.
Net Neutrality Info: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/7fq8uw/supreme_red_pill_comprehensive_breakdown_of_the/
>>752253656
Forgot to mention he cares about our sovernity and wants to protect our borders from crooks. Also the border wall will help to keep out people who have stuff like Ebola and the plague that's currently infesting Madagascar.
>>752253604
No, the liberal companies that own the internet will block, throttle and toll conservative sites
>>752254034
Net Neutrality Info: https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/7fq8uw/supreme_red_pill_comprehensive_breakdown_of_the/
>>752252463
He's a piece of shit selling us out.
>>752254102
Trump humpers found a way to be ok with this, shocking.
>>752254264
>>752254237
The guy who made the most on The Donald read through all the laws pertaining to this going back to 2005. Everything was fine until Pres. Obama made net neutrality. It will actually lead to more regulation and screw us over. Read through and see for yourself.
>>752254349
>>752254471
post*
FCC chairman Ajit Pai says his children are being harassed over net neutrality
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/11/27/fcc-chairman-ajit-pai-says-his-children-are-being-harassed-over-net-neutrality/
it's his own fault
>>752252463
>faggot was made chairman or commissioner or some shit near the beginning of this year
>former Verizon shill's been doing bullshit ever since he was put in
>/b/ is just now getting learning of him
fuck all of you, he's been kiking for isps all year and you fags are just now getting.
>>752254471
net neutrality is how the net naturally works, those regulations stopped ISP's from fucking around with that, get out of here with your bullshit.
>>752254662
>net neutrality is how the net neutrality works
mfw
>>752254237
Trump could shit on their dinner table and they would find a way to twist it into a positive thing.
>>752254781
yea we already know you don't know shit about the net, so it's not surprising you don't know this.
>>752254865
The internet is supposed to net neutrality like net neutrality?
>>752254865
I think this retard didn't realize you said both "neutrality" and "naturally"
>>752255294
i like pineapples
>>752255378
I like pines, apples, and pineapples
>>752252463
He's doing good work.He will be responsible for finally getting rid of 4chan.
>>752255546
and breitbart, and stormfront and wmd
bye bye shitholes.
>>752253435
>>752253214
i really hope someone grows some fucking balls and does it. instead of shooting up worthless school children that didnt do shit, use your suicide murder to take out this piece of shit and go down a fucking legend
>>752255508
how about pineses?
>>752255660
Yep, And 4chan
>>752255688
sauce?
>>752255797
sauce.
>>752255741
i'm not american so I'll be able to see it just fine, if they can survive the massive reduction in traffic that is.
If not oh well not my problem, other places like reddit will be just fine, time warner owns them and they're a massive company so they'll be all right.
>>752256005
lol time warner is the worst. a decade ago they were in the news for selling all their users info to advertising corporations. theyre as greedy as it comes
>>752252463
I like him. I like how he effortlessly triggers little liberal bitches who whine day and night about muh evil corporations and muh internet speeds...and use the internet to whine, ironically.
>>752254597
Terms You Need to Know:
Title II / Common Carrier / "Net Neutrality" = internet becomes gov't utility = Obamanet = not good
FTC Regulation = no monopolies (comcast), no price-fixing, no unfair shit = good
Open Internet Rules / Bright Line Rules = no throttling, no blocking, no paid-priority = very good
Timeline You Need to Know
- 2005 Open Internet announced as FCC policy. Internet still so new, not much for FCC to really do.
- 2010 Open Internet Order = Open Internet Rules (aka Bright Line) specified (good)
- 2014 Verizon v. FCC prevents FCC from enforcing Open Internet Rules unless it also enforces Title II (big gov't comes in and literally makes the internet its utility) <<wtf,why??? fun fact the two judges who fucked the internet were appointed by clinton, the third dissenter was reagan
- 2015 Net Neutrality (pushed by Obama) = Open Internet Rules (renamed to Bright Line) (good) + Title II Utility Classification (BAD)
- 2017 Net Neutrality Repeal = FTC Regulations (good) + no Title II (good) + no Open Internet Rules (bad) '(
The reason Obama's 2015 Net Neutrality is bad isn't because it includes the Open Internet Rules (created in 2005), but because it includes the Title II Utility Classification of the internet. AND- get this- the Open Internet Rules are only included provisionally, UNDER Title II. This basically says "hey all ur free speech is only allowed if big gov't gets to turn the internet into its utility". Umm what? 2015 Net Neutrality was advertised as being equal to the Open Internet Rules, but Open Internet had already been an FCC policy since 2005. Obama pressured the FCC to repackage the 2010 Open Internet Order under a Title II Utility Classification of the internet. This is what we oppose.
Everyone here agrees that ISPs should not throttle/paywall/censor/restrict our content. Period. End of story. ISPs are notoriously shady, but here are some reassurances the FCC has given us:
<see next post>
>>752256005
It's not time warner anymore,it's Spectrum. Time Warner doesn't own Reddit anymore
>>752256274
FTC Privacy Regulation, sec.177 aka MARK SUCKERSPERG CAN'T STEAL YOUR PRIVATE RARE PEPE FETISH PORN COLLECTION:
"Restoring FTC [Federal Trade Commission] jurisdiction over ISPs will enable the FTC to apply its extensive privacy and data security expertise to provide the uniform online privacy protections that consumers expect and deserve."
>>752256480
Direct quote from the homies: No throttling. FCC release, p.83 ( https://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2017/db1122/DOC-347927A1.pdf ):
Many of the largest ISPs (Comcast, AT&T, Verizon, Cox, Frontier, etc.) have committed in this proceeding not to block or throttle legal content.507 These commitments can be enforced by the FTC under Section 5, protecting consumers without imposing public-utility regulation on ISPs.508
b-but im an ISP I don't wanna be transparent I just wanna bait-and-switch my customers while they watch intergalactic bdsm porn SORRY HUNNY U GETTN REGULATED (FCC release p.82):
The FTC’s unfair-and-deceptive-practices authority “prohibits companies from selling consumers one product or service but providing them something different,” which makes voluntary commitments enforceable.502 The FTC also requires the “disclos[ur]e [of] material information if not disclosing it would mislead the consumer,” so if an ISP “failed to disclose blocking, throttling, or other practices that would matter to a reasonable consumer, the FTC’s deception authority would apply.”503
>>752256109
I'm not saying they're good, but they are a massive company, and an ISP, they'll lookout for their interests online which include reddit.
It's all those little conservative sites that are in danger of getting fucked in the ass by liberal companies like comcast and at&t
>>752256534
Conspiracy theorists put down your pitch-forks, ISPs cannot conspire. (FCC invokes Sherman Act Antitrust Laws, Section 144, p.85, FCC release)
Section 1 of the Sherman Act bars contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade, making anticompetitive arrangements illegal. If ISPs reached agreements to unfairly block, throttle, or discriminate against Internet conduct or applications, these agreements would be per seillegal under the antitrust laws.518
**UNLIMITED NETFLIXXX, [UNCENSORED EDITION] **
If an ISP that also sells video services degrades the speed or quality of competing “Over the Top” video services (such as Netflix),526 that conduct could be challenged as anticompetitive foreclosure.
>>752256604
Obama & The Globalist Friendship Squad attempted to create a communist takeover safe space on the internet.
We also conclude that the Commission should have been cautioned against reclassifying broadband Internet access service as a telecommunications service in 2015 because doing so involved “laying claim to extravagant statutory power over the national economy ..."
AT&T got uppity, tried to slide a fat & nasty nude into America's DMs and the FCC said behave yourself hunny. FCC now reserves the right to return to Title II (Obama Net Neutrality) regulations if ISP fuckers get uppity.:
176.We also reject AT&T’s assertion that the Commission should conditionally forbear from all Title II regulations as a preventive measure to address the contingency that a future Commission might seek to reinstate the Title II Order.647 Although AT&T explains that “conditional forbearance would provide an extra level of insurance against the contingency that a future, politically motivated Commission might try to reinstate a ‘common carrier’ classification [2015 Net Neutrality Regulations],”648 we see no need to address the complicated question of prophylactic forbearance and find such extraordinary measures [are] unnecessary.
>>752256274
ernahgerd obammanet!
holy fuck this is dumb
couldn't get anyone to read your retarded T_D link so you copypasted it huh?
For those who don't know shit about Net Neutrality.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtt2aSV8wdw
It's worth rioting for to protect.
>>752252463
https://www.theverge.com/2017/7/12/15715030/what-is-net-neutrality-fcc-ajit-pai-bill-rules-repealed
>>752256713
TLDR
- Regulatory rollback throwback to 90's.
- FCC claims the 2015 Regulations gave the government "extravagant
statutory power over the national economy". * laughs in Kenyan *
- Regulatory oversight of the ISP industry shifts back to FTC (Federal
Trade Commission) as it has been since the invention of the internet.
- FCC is enforcing against throttling, censorship, restriction, etc. by
invoking consumer protection and anti-trust laws (via FTC).
- If ISPs collectively conspire to paywall a content-provider, they are
subject to FTC anti-trust penetration.
- FCC has reduced its own jurisdiction, because they're typically geared
toward stricter and narrower regulations (censoring profanity on the
radio, cable, etc.) as opposed to regulating the entire internet service -
provider industry.
- FCC repeatedly acknowledges that its new policy is deliberately
business-friendly in hopes to expand the economy (internet plays a
huge role obviously). Acknowledges that potential abuse of this
friendliness will result in stricter policy.
- America has some of the shittiest internet in the world because our
infrastructure is antiquated and fiber-optic trenching projects keep
getting killed. Hopefully this provides the investment needed to fix that.
Better infrastructure means faster speeds and cheaper service.
- Remember all the Congressmen who wanted to sell out our personal
information earlier this year? Allegedly this FCC repeal will block that,
because of FTC consumer privacy protection regulations don't allow it.
>>752256713
How this will negatively affect you:
The major loophole lies here:
Many of the largest ISPs have committed to not to block or throttle legal content.507 These commitments can be enforced by the FTC...
FTC can only prevent throtting/blocking/etc because that's what ISPs are advertising. If multiple ISPs each individually stop advertising it, it's not immediately clear that the FTC can hold them all accountable to it. However, if the ISPs collude to collectively enact abusive policies, then the FTC can fuck them up. But if an ISP paywalls websites, they must explicitly notify consumers. If customers have no alternative ISP and are forced to obey their one ISP's abusive policies, then the FTC can declare them a monopoly. That would whip up a shitstorm for the ISP, but it could still happen.
Later in the report the FCC admits that they are eliminating the Bright-Line Rules, which is bad for us.
>>752256274
>OBAMANET IZ BAD
>WE CAN TOTALLY TRUST THE FCC AND ISPs
You're a god damn ass burger.
>>752252463
he's perfect it shows how fucked up usa really is
>>752256480
what is this, I don't even
what's meant by private? If you mean on your computer then no why the hell would they, what does this have to do with anything?
>>752252463
Obviously, this is to pay back corporate political donors.
>>752256534
Comcast was already caught throttling torrents and netflix, you're really going to take a company's promise not to fuck around with the internet when they've already done it before? Are you that naive?
>>752252463
II'm indifferent. I'm not afraid of the internet returning to 2015 rules, and I'm already hearing ads from ISPs boasting that they have no data limits and no throttling of any sites, etc. That is, net neutrality has become a marketing tool for the big ISPs. And besides, you'd have to be retarded to think Trump was going to put in a leftist socialist who would expand government controls on commerce. I mean, who is so stupid to think that the FCC policy is coming from this guy alone, and that somehow if someone else were in there, it would be different? Obviously most retards ITT.
>>752256923
Here's the problem we have. Obama fuck it up. We had something when it was classified as a utility not title 2. Which gives them even more power against us. Have you not wondered why the internet speeds and just over feel of it has been different? It's because of this fuck up.
>>752256604
they've already been caught throttling stuff before, more shit pulled from your ass that has nothing to do with the net.
and you're going to rely on the current government to trust bust? google and comcast is laughing it's ass off at that one.
>>752256713
ermahgurd obama communists, DERP
he's a sadme.me
>>752256926
TLDR
OBAMA!! DERP!
>>752257222
they've already been caught in the past throttling things like torrents and netflix and they'll do it again if allowed to.
>>752253214
Unless it is an Obummercrat, right? Soros shill detected
>>752253814
Yeah something posted by a random on r/The_Donald is definitely objective and unbiased.
>>752257706
and their competitors will gobble up their market share
In your experience, has the internet become faster or slower over the years, without a lot of regulation?
>>752257720
Pai will allow people like him to control the internet, have fun with that
>>752252463
I hate this fucking shitskin.
>>752257802
no they won't, the cable and internet companies don't compete, they carved up their own regions and basically price match eachother. AT&T has sued multiple cities that tried to roll their own internet setups despite not providing any services of their own in those areas, they have lobbied states to bar municipalities from rolling their own. You're insane if you think any of this would get better with Pai and industry shill at the command.
>>752254529
Anyone know where his dox were dumped?
>>752256926
Title II hasn’t hurt network investment, according to the ISPs themselves
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/05/title-ii-hasnt-hurt-network-investment-according-to-the-isps-themselves/
>>752253814
Ha. You idiots will literally believe anything written on the internet as long as it confirms your biases.
>>752253562
muh freemarket
>>752257346
>durr hurr Obama fucked it up
It's the Trump administration doing this, fuckwad
>>752252463
LEAVE HIS FAMILY ALONE
EVEN THOUGH HES ABOUT TO FUCK WITH YOURS
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/361998-fcc-chairman-stop-harassing-my-family-over-net-neutrality
>>752255688
source?
>>752256273
No matter how much his policies will fuck you over once you stop being supported by your parents. Brilliant, child.
>>752253814
1. TPP was already off the table
2. Neil Gorsuch is a right winger. That isn't "good" anon.
3. So you're OK with Trump having no morals
4. Trump is a draft dodger anon
5. Trump has literally had none of his policy passed. That's wasting taxpayer dollars anon
Jesus you Trumpfags are fucking stupid
>>752253953
>our sovernity
our what?
Speak English faggot
>>752254471
>durr hurr nigger fucked it up
kys Trumpfag
>>752254264
Dumbest? Please. He'll retire after the deed is done and go get a hundred million dollar paycheck as the CEO of some related company.
>>752256273
post sharpie in pooper faggot
>>752258936
>2. Neil Gorsuch is a right winger. That isn't "good" anon.
So people who read the constitution and give their ruling based not on what political party they are in are "right wing" huh?
>>752256273
Durr stiggit!
>>752259638
Gorsuch will rule along Republican party lines, so yes he is.
We need more liberals on the court, not less.
>>752259773
but anon Gorsuch is a liberal
>>752259864
maybe in some mirror universe he is
not this one
>>752258835
Fuck him and his family right in the face.
>>752253814
the "analysis" in your link is fucking laughable & unbelievably naive. you really only need to ask yourself one question... if repealing net neutrality isn't good for ISPs, then why the fuck are they clamoring for it?
>>752260045
>mob mentality
maybe we should harrass YOUR family faggot
>>752259773
so you want more people who will rule on democrat party lines?
Because DC v Heller was a 4-5 win for the constitution. 4 left wing agenda pushing democrat justices flat out threw the constitution out the window with that ruling and said that the government infringing on your right was not really the government infringign on your rights because thats how their democrat masters told them to vote.
>>752260161
Sweet comeback.
Drain the swamp. You're left with slime.
>>752260204
>democrat party lines
there is no "democrat party"
>>752260161
But he isn't a known corporate shill and enemy of democracy. Harass this floor shitter's kids more says I.
>>752260204
There is literally no Democrat that is going to seek overturning Heller.
You gun nuts are fucking crazy. You faggots try to make EVERY FUCKING THING ABOUT GUNS
IT ISN'T
THERE ARE OTHER MORE IMPORTANT THINGS THAN FUCKING FIREARMS
>>752252463
i live in Russia, irrelevant
>>752255797
>>752258845
Don't know but here's this. Courtesy of the association of Fuck Ajit Pai. Or ass. F.A.P.
>>752260572
Too bad. Whatever this fuckstick is deciding to do, his family does not deserve to be hassled and I will report each and every one of you faggots that advocate that shit.
>>752253814
Just another ubiquitous Trumpkin shill
>>752260588
Correct. We should quit giving a shit about firearms and spend more time research the ability to fire arms.
>>752260631
take a gift from 'murica
>>752256534
Ok, let's ignore all the times that's already happened. Or faked outages. Or whatever other scummy shit they've tried to do to bring us where we are now.
Let's also ignore the fact that 33% of americans live under just two choices for ISP and that the vast majority of those work together to match rates and packages in a duopoly. I'm sure they won't work together! /s
>>752256926
Fiber networks aren't getting built because telecom companies are lobbying against them and stonewalling them at the local and state levels to prevent competition.
>>752260631
you give a suck on Putin's cock to get on Internet
>>752257720
You realize Obama was the one who put Pai in office, right? Obama had the habit of reaching across the aisle and making compromises to make conservatives feel better.
A big mistake. Even if the Republicans were the ones who invented the precursor to Obamacare, they had it mutilated to shit before voting for it. No wonder people call it broken, yet they don't know who broke it.
Why the fuck was Obama even letting that shit happen, there was a pretty good majority for the Dems back then.
>>752261732
Yeah but Pai didn't threaten to do this shit until Trump got elected.
And it was the Democratic party majority that kept the FCC in check, because as a whole they wouldn't have pushed for this shit, either.
>>752259773
You mean we need people who objectively apply the law LIKE IDK A JUDGE IS SUPPOSED TO instead of voting party lines? Because I think that's what you meant.
>>752261970
Nope. There is literally no stipulation that a judge has to strictly interpret a law as it's written.
That's why they're judges, faggot.
>>752261970
Democrats aren't all liberals, anon. Obama didn't push for same sex marriage, it took the Court to pass it.
Gorsuch wouldn't pass that shit today if he ruled on a gay marriage case.
>>752252463
Same as i think about op and that Soros dude that's giving you money.
>see pic related
>Obeezy din du nuffin
>>752261732
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajit_V._Pai
"He has served in various positions at the FCC since being appointed to the commission by President Barack Obama in May 2012, at the recommendation of Mitch McConnell. He was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on May 7, 2012,[1] and was sworn in on May 14, 2012, for a five-year term.[2]
In January 2017, President Donald Trump designated Pai as FCC Chairman.[3][4] In March 2017, Trump announced that he would renominate Pai to serve another five-year term as FCC Chairman."
At the recommendation of McConnell. Put into a position of authority by Trump.
>>752261923
Yeah, no way in hell would a Dem majority do that shit. It was their fault for trying to appease the other side. Should have just gone full democratic-socialist, or whatever is the polar opposite of putting an oil barren in charge of the EPA.
Makes you sad that being a good-guy means not being able to get shit done properly, and being the asshole means being able to get it done quick, but not caring at all.
>>752262202
>>752262066
Justices have a mandate to be unbiased. They can in fact interpret law, but they are supposed to do so in an objective fashion, and they fucking don't.
>>752262426
Just saying, no calls to eliminate NN until Trump got elected.
You lose this one. You don't get to blame the fucking Democrats for this shit.
>>752262676
>Justices have a mandate to be unbiased
Show me the Article or Amendment of the US Constitution which stipulates this.
Protip: you can't
>>752262772
>You don't get to blame the fucking Democrats for this shit.
But they will anyway, if a dem didn't do it then they'll be blamed for not stopping it.
>>752263347
OK so let people be stupid
that's why we're here--to bash them
>>752262841
28 U.S. Code § 453 - Oaths of justices and judges
Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”
Note impartially.
Part of the code of conduct which is also title law is:
A judge should be faithful to, and maintain professional competence in, the law and should not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor, or fear of criticism.
Care to correct yourself?
>>752253558
Wow. That's pretty awesome. I guess things aren't as bad as they seem.
>>752263497
Problem is their stupid is fucking the rest of the country up, it's getting people killed.
Now if their stupid only affected them then I'd be fine with it, but it's not.
>>752263623
They won't be back, but good on you for smacking that stupid down.
>>752263770
>>752263950
That's the nature of trolls. They'll move on to easier areas to spread their idiotic propaganda.
And hey, on the off chance that poster wasn't a troll, maybe they'll have actually learned something today.
>>752263623
Doesn't say shit about being "objective."
Jesus you faggots don't know how to give up.
>>752263623
Name the last judge who was booted from the Federal Court System for not being "partial."
I'll wait.
Don't say that! It's an insult to fecal matter everywhere.
>>752263950
smacking what "stupid shit" down?
Both of you are buttmad about perceived "liberal activist judges" it's totally fucking obvious
>>752264592
This is called cognitive dissonance, and it's bad. It's okay to be wrong. Everyone makes mistakes. What you are doing right now is rationalizing. You know 'impartial', 'nonpartisan', and other such words are synonomous with having an objective mindset when applying law, but because I didn't say objective from the source material, you completely ignore it.
We were talking about having liberals and conservatives on the Supreme Court to advance liberal or conservative interests. Their code expressly forbids such interests to apply, yet they still vote partisan lines anyway. My point is that the nine justices on that bench shouldn't be bringing a goddamn partisan thing into the courtroom with them and USC agrees with me.
Peruse this, then.
http://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges
>>752265249
You're the one who want right wing dipshits on the Court, anon.
You don't get to project your bullshit on me.
>>752265249
>yet they still vote partisan lines anyway
Democrats aren't always liberals, anon.
You've really got a bug up your ass about this. Let it go.
>>752265249
Still waiting for you to provide an example of a judge getting booted according to your ridiculously strict interpretation of the law.
You will never do this.
>>752264383
You're the faggot whining about "activist judges."
That's Republican Party propaganda, anon.
Why do you think you should get a pass?
>>752264763
They never hold federal judges to that. Just because they don't, doesn't mean that they shouldn't. Good misdirection, though.
Lower judges get removed all the time.
>>752265851
>shoulda woulda coulda
kek
>>752265461
sea lioning
first you asked where it was in law, that was provided, now you want examples,
if you get one you'll move your goal posts again and ask for something else.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_lioning
>>752265606
need to know who this is
He looks like he was dropped on the head repeatedly as a baby.
>>752256273
>Liberals use the internet to bitch about losing the internet
You have just made abso-fuckin'-lutely no sense what-so-ever. Good job.
>>752254471
yeah, well, sort of
>>752265992
There's no "law" that governs your definition of what a judge is, anon.
You're full of shit.
>>752265461
Do you realize how difficult it is to legally prove bias of a judicial action?
If bias is earnestly suspected, there is usually an investigation that either ends with nothing or a paper trail to larger crimes. Since you have to actually impeach the fuckers to remove them, you would need some damning proof of bias, like recorded admission of guilt. Things associated to less ideological bias like kick-backs and bribery carry more weight than the bias that results.
>>752265573
>>752265348
I'm not that guy, thanks. I don't want right or left wing idiots on the court.
>>752265401
Democrats are rarely liberals.
>>752265461
"I don't like your facts so let me make up some excuse to ignore them!"
Unfortunately, they don't remove federal judges for being partisan, even though they should. They do regularly remove lower level judges for this reason, however.
Here is a list of federal judges removed for any reason.
https://ballotpedia.org/Impeachment_of_federal_judges
Trump likes him. Makes him okay in my book
>>752266020
that is TR4p.F3m1n1N3
>>752252463
I think people like OP who mock the names of political adversaries are too immature to take seriously.
>>752254529
Keep sending the pizzas!
>>752266278
>Democrats are rarely liberals.
well that's bullshit
>>752266278
>they don't remove federal judges for being partisan, even though they should.
and let me guess, more Democrat judges would get booted
>>752266393
Why not boxes they're free
>>752266278
We need liberal judges on the court. Conservatives have proven they have no compassion for others, particularly the poor or the downtrodden.
>>752266406
Not the guy you're responding to, but if you're paying even a little attention, you'll realize that today's Democrats are little more than left leaning republicans.
>>752266591
No they aren't.
This is why Trump won, btw.
>>752266278
>Democrats are rarely liberals.
This mothafucka right here...
I don't think those words mean what you think they mean.
>>752266406
Democrats want liberty for people (except for guns) and regulation for companies
Republicans want liberty for companies and regulation for people (except guns)
Libertarians want liberty for both but they're also fucking morons
>>752252463
George Soros is pushing a LOT of money against the FCC and so is ShareBlue. That speaks volumes.
>>752252463
>>752252590
^this
sage
>>752266861
>(except for guns)
So Obama took your guns?
lol
>>752266986
what other buzzwords do you print out and shove up your ass anon?
>>752254597
Not true. Even the Senate was hard on him because they knew he was yet another fox brought in to guard the chicken-coop.
https://youtu.be/5HrKITK83vc
Agit Prop was lying low while the country got tuckered out by all the other scandals first.
>>752252463
What does /b/ think of this thread >>752261898
>>752267466
faggot
>>752266463
I'm non partisan. I don't play this liberal/conservative democrat/republican game. Justices are required by law to be the same way. They aren't and they aren't held accountable by our government, but that does not change the fact that they should be and that the law intended for that to be the case.
I personally find myself less in agreeance with conservatives about literally anything. I've attached some cancer so you can kind of see how wrong you are.
>>752266558
Also you. Conservatives are cancer. Liberals are not the answer. All ideologies are flawed because they rely on an underlying system of beliefs that does not change and cannot incorporate new information to make new and better informed decisions.
>>752266406
American Democrats are right of center on the majority of policy issues.
>>752266796
It's entirely possible I could be wrong about anything and everything. I don't claim to be omnipotent. Present me a case and change my mind if you feel so strongly.
>>752267532
And yet all you've done is complain about liberals, anon, while giving token "criticism" to conservatives in an attempt to save face. You're a faggot.
>>752267532
You said "rarely liberals"
It's time to play "What shitty country do you come from, anon?"
I love this game. You're obviously so far above us, I'd like to know what fucking paradise you hail from.
>>752252463
He's an extension of Republican policy
>>752266675
Compared to the rest of the world, yea they are.
>>752252463
I think that since Americans are well known for going psycho and killing people, the next one might as well be a hero (and an hero) by taking this cocksucker out.
>>752266473
You didn't read the WaPo story. (>>752254529
).
>>752266986
Do you worry about what the Koch's and Mercers do as well or is it only the big scary Soros?
>>752268050
>liberals aren't even liberals
This is why Trump won.
>>752268176
So, still no reason to NOT send free boxes.
>>752267695
I hate conservatives.
I hate Trump.
I hate what Bush did to this country. I hate what he did to Iraq for literally no reason.
I hate how conservatives try to regulate people's personal lives according to their own misguided beliefs in a book not everyone cares about.
I hate how they deny science for personal gain.
Reagan is the worst thing that happened to our country for decades until Trump.
Is that enough? Should I post more? Can you accept that just because I have a distaste for one side of the political spectrum, I'm not automatically included in the other side? You've been sold this ideological duopoly for so long you don't seem to understand there exists schools of thought outside of it.
I don't know what I posted that gave you that idea that I must be some sort of conservative. I think you have me confused with someone else.
>>752261454
Was my first post.
>>752261970
2nd
>>752266986
So maybe that explains the vehemence and homogeneity of many of the posts here.
>>752268299
The problem is you'll probably try to make the Democrats the same thing as what you "hate" about Trump.
You fucked up in this thread, anon.
>>752268210
Great rebuttal, really showed me that on a global scale american democrats aren't all that liberal.
>>752266861
lol!
[spoiler]>>752268299
>you've confused me with someone else
If you're this faggot
>>752263623
fuck off
It was posted in response to my dislike of right-wingers on the Supreme Court like Gorsuch.
>>752267828
I come from the US. Just because I have some mild law education and can search google doesn't mean I'm some kind of god. I'm just as retarded as many of you. The only talent I possess is the ability to look at things relatively objectively. I say relatively because you can never know if you're truly objective. Just like you can never know if what you believe to be true is actually true.
>>752266986
Citation please
>>752268536
It means you really don't understand US politics and probably shouldn't be discussing them.
>>752267466
Maybe try not reading it.
>>752268624
If you're going out of your way to look at something "objectively," then you have problems forming strong opinions about things. This is not a good thing.
>>752268599
I am that faggot, and it was posted in response to this:
>>752262841
">Justices have a mandate to be unbiased
Show me the Article or Amendment of the US Constitution which stipulates this.
Protip: you can't"
But I did, anon. Now you are angry because you are trying to defend your tiny bubble of what you consider reality. I did not post that in response to anything except your challenge that I could not post it. The difference between you and me, anon, is that I don't let shit dribble from my mouth if I know I have nothing to back it up.
>>752268370
I have no idea what you're trying to say here.
>>752268648
NN is not just for MuriKKKans, you know. Those assholes love to belly-flop in the world's pool.
Like when they invented the TSA and suddenly airports all around the world became concentration camps.
>>752268889
And you didn't. There is literally nothing in the US Constitution that backs up your contention about how judges should hand down rulings.
>>752252463
Surprised that no one has done anything to expose all of the illegal activity he has done in the past.
>>752252463
Think he's great and is causing your cuck master Soros to spend millions in another futile effort
>>752268648
If you think democrats are liberal when viewed on a global scale then you have little understanding of US politics.
Even if you just view them in the US democrats aren't all that liberal. Take a look at Bernie, that's what a liberal looks like. Democrats are mostly center lefts, that doesn't make them liberal by a long shot.
>>752268889
>wanting activist judges
wew lad
>>752267532
First, you would need to establish what makes a Republican or Democrat, the only official way we have of doing this is by voting record (brand-loyalty). After all, someone can describe themselves to be whatever to a tee, but if they vote for the opposing side it's rather meaningless.
Second, you would have to have a clear designation of liberal populations and how they differ from other Democrats. There is no "liberal" party, or popular "liberal" candidate, so there's no real way to tell how many voters would jump ship if given the chance.
Third, since there is no "liberal" party and you want to have a distinction between liberal and Democrat, you would have to assume that the majority of liberals don't vote. Back to point one, if they voted Democrat, how would you have any idea were actually of the strictly liberal populace mentioned in point two?
You aren't left with many choices. Conservative Democrats are like unicorns, and moderates and those that would refer to themselves as liberals are mostly indistinguishable if they both continue to vote Democrat.
>>752268945
are you this faggot?>>752267532
>liberals are not the answer
?
>>752256274
Holy shit he actually said "I gave it a nickname with Obama in it therefore it's bad" as an argument. Find something tall and jump.
>>752269144
>Democrats are mostly center lefts
center left IS liberal, anon.
You literally don't know wtf you're talking about.
>>752268755
Strong opinions are not fact based logic. They are opinions. They are based on a subjective interpretation of facts.
Strong opinions are resistant to change. Consider this. Since we constantly learn new things, it follows to reason that our opinions must change to reflect our new knowledge. If they do not change, then we learn nothing or we end up in a situation where we must rationalize facts to support our previous, now untenable, position. A good example of this with conservatives is climate change.
>>752257222
Trips of truth. Besides, with everyone being so up in arms about net neutrality and censorship, people have seemed to forgot Prohibition.
Let a very bad thing happen and the backlash will correct the situation, once and for all.
>>752269478
not in Blahmerica
>>752269501
And this justifies putting a right winger like Gorsuch on the Supreme Court?
kek
>>752269218
>Conservative Democrats are like unicorns
Today I learned that blue dog democrats don't exist.
>>752269501
Or you're just hiding behind the mask of centrism, and won't take needed stands on issues.
>>752252463
Appointed bureaucrats rarely fight to reduce the power of their departments. In light of all the autistic screeching fear mongers, I'd say he's got some fucking huge balls.
FCC is shit; a censoring body that controls "decency" on radio and TV. The internet had 20 years away from their controls, it doesn't need it now.
>>752269614
And anon claims to be from the US. Let's watch his spelling closely and see. :^)
>>752269661
Giving more power to telecoms already flush with cash is having "fucking huge balls?"
>>752269478
You're a Trumper aren't you?
They often have trouble grasping nuance, the world is not black and white.
Being slightly left does not a liberal make, but thanks for playing.
>>752257706
they werent actually throttling netflix. netflix made the accusation, verizon asked them to back up their claim, netflix retracted their statement. netflix was lying so they could get free shit.
>>752269564
yes it is faggot
you might have a point if you stated the Dems are center-right, but you clearly don't know the difference.
We're done. I'm satisfied. I'm right.
>>752269879
I voted for Sanders in the primary and Clinton in the general.
You're full of shit, faggot. Again.
>>752270060
Sure you did Trumpelstiltskin
>>752269180
Great job reading words that aren't there.
>>752269034
I suppose you're right. It's just US Code which is still law of the land, so I guess it doesn't actually matter, does it?
I suppose you WANT a bunch of biased, partisan judges on the supreme court to advance interests at the behest of political parties and not objectively follow the rule of law as they are supposed to? Is that what you want anon? Let me know and we can end this convo right here. I am under the impression that is NOT what people want.
>>752269275
Yep that's me too.
Liberals aren't the answer.
Fully objective, rational, and self-aware human beings are the answer to the best of my knowledge. As I've said, every ideology reliant on unflinching beliefs (that's like....all of them) is fundamentally flawed. The closest I've heard to a truly good form of governance was what black science guy proposed. Too tired to find a link for it right now.
>>752269614
I said unicorns, like CW5's, they're out there, but their percentage is remarkably smaller.
>>752270210
Yeah I voted for Trump so I could oppose policies like nominating Neil Gorsuch and opposing the FCC decision to end Net Neutrality.
Me=5 You=0
>>752270256
I asked you where in the Constitution the stipulations you claimed regarding judge behavior were and you did not provide shit.
You're making it up as you go along, anon. And it still doesn't justify Gorsuch. And if you think "both sides" have "activist judges" then you're against liberal-leaning rulings that have been handed down, and that makes faggots like me stabby.
>>752270256
>Liberals aren't the answer.
This is literally beyond retarded, anon.
>black science guy
is a flaming liberal
Me=7 You=still 0
>>752269580
When did I ever, ever say I liked Gorsuch? We've been over this, and now you are just trolling me. I hate him. He isn't objective. I watched his congressional hearing. He doesn't deserve to be on that bench. He will cause damage. That's sad.
>>752269650
I'm not a centrist. I take stances on issues based on the facts I have available.
>>752270881
>stances on issues based on the facts I have available.
that IS centrism, anon.
I hope you're under 30.
>>752270881
>When did I ever, ever say I liked Gorsuch?
if you're not this faggot,
>>752259638
I apologize
>>752269916
Netflix never tried to get anything for free. they pay for their own internet connection (multiple 100 gigabit connections from level 3, cogent, and various others. It is then up to the ISP's to make sure their network and interconnects can provide the needed throughput on their end to support where their customers want to go on the internet.
>>752270547
You're moving the goalposts and ignoring me because you just can't understand what I'm saying. I linked you USC 28 which is standing law. I've never said the words activist judges. I hate Neil Gorsuch and I strongly oppose his appointment. You're just mad.
>>752271165
here's an overview I found, but with comcast instead of verizon. it sure sounds like they were asking for free shit.
https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2015/03/25/why-your-netflix-traffic-is-slow-and-why-the-open-internet-order-wont-necessarily-make-it-faster/
>>752256005
>tfw we'll all be forced to be redditors in a few months
>>752271061
I'm not that faggot. I have said many faggoty things, but that is not one of them.
>>752270970
"In politics, centrism or the centre is a political outlook or specific position that involves acceptance or support of a balance of a degree of social equality and a degree of social hierarchy, while opposing political changes which would result in a significant shift of society either strongly to the left or the right."
That is not me, anon.
>>752257720
Autistic b8
>>752271787
OK then I'm not sure what quote caused our disconnect, but I disagree that judges are really held to any "Code of Law," which is why we need to appoint the right ones the first time.
Judges are not necessarily neutral, they do have left and right leaning biases through upbringing and experience.
>>752271487
Peering is not really suppose to cost anything since it is a mutual benefit, neither network can survive without the other. For example, how would comcast or verizon customers feel if if they lost access to 90+%of the websites and services online?
The major bandwidth providers who provide the throughpput needed for web hosting, want to be able to have consumers access those services and web pages.
ISPs that service consumers, want to have access to those servers, as that is the primary reason the customers purchased the internet connection.
>>752272319
let's also add, the argument of imbalance traffic means nothing, by the nature of websites and pretty much every single popular service online, will transmit more data than they receive.
>>752269501
Straight up bot.
>>752272627
Not sure why you think that.
Anyway this is far from the point. Fuck Pai, fuck giving power to ISPs who will abuse it, do what you can to support net neutrality.
>>752252463
This guy has no soul - he sold it for coin. He has no real future - just a few trinkets in this life.
>>752273116
>Not sure why you think that.
Sounds like one.
>Anyway this is far from the point. Fuck Pai, fuck giving power to ISPs who will abuse it, do what you can to support net neutrality.
Agree absolutely.
![u9I7LVQ[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/TmIyBeZ.jpg "u9I7LVQ[1].png")
