Maga truth thread. Team Trump/Ajit. Make Internet Great Again
Net "neutrality" will KILL jobs
Less govement oversite = good
>>751933058
Obama loving cuck
>>751933076
Prove it, shitbird.
>>751933191
Easy, Obama was big government and horible. Regan was small government and the second greatest president to ever live
Send something like this to your official's let's fight the libcucks fighting the removeal of this terrible polocy.
The unprecedented regulatory power the Obama Administration imposed on the internet is smothering innovation, damaging the American economy and obstructing job creation. I urge the Federal Communications Commission to end the bureaucratic regulatory overreach of the internet known as Title II and restore the bipartisan light-touch regulatory consensus that enabled the internet to flourish for more than 20 years.
Net nutrality was made by Obama to control you and hurt buisness
Am I late for the shilling party?
>>751933738
You here to pretend net neutrality is good too?
>>751933873
I have yet to hear a compelling argument to why repealing NN will help make the internet great again.
>>inb4 b-b-b-but Obama and Soros!!!
>>751934648
>>751933407
Reagan is the one of the worst Presidents ever. He created a huge recession, interest rates tripled, the housing market crashed, unemployment soared, just to mention a few of his failures.
Reagan is the father of American Fascism.
>>751934198
Russian shill, trying to destroy America further.
>>751934648
Either ur 4 him or ur against him. If ur against him go back to plebit
It amazes me a chunk of people don't understand the word neutral.
>>751934648
Only because you are waiting to be spoon-fed encapsulated info that you can digest easily. You're a lazy millennial who can't do his own research. Or a Russian shill.
http://fortune.com/2017/11/23/net-neutrality-explained-what-it-means-and-why-it-matters/
>>751935013
CNN shill. Youe party lost, GET OVER IT
>>751933076
This pic completely misses the point of net neutrality.
Is this what the tard think? NSA is involved?
Also implying there are no good regulations on corporate greed?
How quickly republicans forget that the greatest Republican to ever live was Teddy "Big Dick in your Corporate Face" Roosevelt.
>>751935013
but but but my family is white upper class, and we did really well under Reagan!
>>751933407
Yeah, Reganomics sure didn't fuck anything up.....
Neutrality supporters be like "Obama fixed the internet" MAGA kek
I find it amusing. /pol/ gets fucked by this as ISPs get closer to blocking content. Also while thr tax bill goes through, white middle class men like myself get fucked on things like mortgage deductions and the cost of my healthcare will continue to rise. This guy is the worst thing for anyone who would be here to read this.
>>751933407
False.
Reagan was the first (and only) president to triple the nation debt limit. Also he LOWERED corporate tax to 40%. Obama wanted to RAISE it to 39%
Read a damn economics book
Donald Trump could show up at your houses with a pack of goons and cut your dicks off, and you'd all say dicks were bad anyway.
Jesus mother murphy fuck you twits are pathetic.
>>751935479
You do understand the issue right?
>>751935417
Prove it didn't work. The economy is doing better than ever. Very high GDP dumbass
>>751935479
Net neutrality isn't about "fixing" the internet you dipshit. I'ts about preventing companies from throttling your connection and gaining a choke hold on the internet
>>751935518
Shill
>>751934956
>>751935125
Wow. A meme and a half-assed statement, very compelling argument to why NN is bad. So bad.
>>751935167
Sure. The guy that hasn't heard one compelling argument to why NN is bad is a Russian shill. If you haven't noticed, I am aware that the end of NN will effect both Liberals and Conservatives alike.
Only people that are for the repeal of NN are idiots that think Obama created it, when NN has been around since the dawn of the internet.
>>751935013
Saint Ronnie was just a figurehead. Much like Trumplethinskin only not quite as stupid, he said whatever his handlers told him to say.
>>751935710
>I'ts about ... companies throttling your connection and gaining a choke hold on the internet
But... that's part of the Trump/Russian agenda. It's a good thing.
>>751935756
Says the guy who is aligned with Russian propagandists.
>>751932893
Trump is a fucking self-made billionaire. If anyone has the foresight to see business opportunities, it's him... and there's plenty of opportunity in a capitalist ISP sector free from big government regulation.
Only commie leftist turds want "net neutrality" because they want businesses to operate at a loss so that they can benefit. Typical entitlement mentality from lazy millennials.
Just leave the job of making America great again to the adults and everything will be okay.
>>751935479
Yea... just like healthcare wasn't broken right?
Corporations are MEANT to fuck us. Thats the neoliberal way. Conservatism died when the republicans allowed Reagan into the party.
>>751935634
kek, I was thinking about this, I'm all for political debate but some people here have their heads so far up Trumps ass they don't see this place is going to suffer from something like this, Sad.
>>751935710
Obama just wanted more regulations. Trump is removing them for us. I donated a lot for trump to MAGA. If he wants netNeut dead it dies libtard snowflake
>>751933076
you don't seem to understand what regulation of the internet involves.
Net neutrality and classifying ISPs as common carriers prevents ISP from doing things like selling your browsing history to advertisers.
It has nothing to do with government surveillance or the NSA.
NSA will spy on you no matter what but at least we have a chance of preventing our internet habits from being traded freely for marketing purposes
>>751935298
We need to organize a reverse Mariel Boatlift for Cruz and Rubio.
>>751935828
Regulations are bad. Less regulations less taxes libcuck
>>751935904
pepes don't count as contribution
Most areas don't have a choice in what isp they can have. It's usually choices of either comcast or at&t dsl so there's no competition. Government allows isp to have exclusive rights contract to areas so there's no competition for what isp you have access to. Without net neutralite you can bet your assistance companies like comcast would treat the internet like cable. Tiered pricing for access to certIan sites. Want youtube? That'll be an extra $5. Want netflix? That's an extra $10 to comcast on top of your regular netflix subscription fee. All other sites not in your tiered package would either be outright blocked or slowed down so bad it's not even worth trying to use those sites you don't pay extra for. Try and say a shit companies like comcast wouldn't love the chance to do that because what the fuck can you do about that? You only have access to 1 isp and can't switch to another. The only way we could remove net neutrality safely is if we got rid of these exclusive rights contracts these isp have and get REAL isp competition goin and that would have to be done first and long before we got rid of net neutrality.
>>751935881
I feel like you are trolling
>>751934648
Fucking Pajet ! Shitting on my internet now, really ???
>>751935904
>>For as long as it hurts liberals, I don't care if corporations anally rape me of my internet speed.
Fixed for you.
>>751933508
what exactly about internet not being a common carrier has made it flourish? i don't think you actually understand what this is about.
net neutrality isn't censorship you know.
>all these idiots that want to repeal net neutrality
>all these idiots who want to pay packages for their websites
>not realizing 4chan won't be accessible anymore
>>751935860
No im just on the MAGA side. I voted trump and I will do so again libcuck
>>751932893
END NN AND OPEN UP THE FREE MARKETS AND ENCOURAGE COMPETION AMONGST THE ISP'S TO LOWER PRICES!!!!
YOU STUPID LIBBIE SCUM MAGA2020!!
>>751935828
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpPABLW6F_A
>>751935996
What makes you think that the repeal of NN will necessarily mean less regulations? Kind of curious to see what you think.
>>751934648
that's cuz none of these trumptards understand NN or what the debate is about.
They follow blindly like sheep and agree with anything the orange man says.
ofc they will have a hard time defending or explaining their views since they haven't put any thought into them.
>>751935634
You are just salty that hillcuck didn't win
>>751936271
don't understand*
>>751936173
Oh look, another furry degenerate. For a moment, I could've sworn that most furfags were liberal. You sure proved me wrong.
![383[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/XmvtxJ3.jpg "383[1].jpg")
>>751932893
daily reminder
>>751936115
Liberal lies
>>751936132
why would they lower prizes if NN is out?
do you think they are not allowed to lower their prizes as is?
Maybe you would like your ISP to offer a youtube package and then a netflix package separately and charge you different rates for different traffic and maybe completely block services that compete with their own.
Is that what you want anon?
>>751936132
This. We've got to end this communist propaganda about regulating capitalism at the government level.
If you end competition with excessive regulation, prices will never come down, value-for-money will never go up, and in a few years they'll start yelling and screaming again about "corporate greed". The left are a bunch of juvenile idiots.
>>751936095
Who'd you vote for?
>having to pay for pornhub
>having to pay for email
>having to pay for Youtube
>The internet will become a capitalist shithole
>the small companies will be drowned by large corporate dickholes
>no more raiding because of the pay divide
Download all your steam games now boys
>>751936027
Also Net Neutrality has fuck all with government spying on you. They gonna spy on you with or without net neutrality. Because again. Net neutrality has nothing to do with NSA spying on you. Net Neutrality makes makes it so you have equal acess to all websites. Makes it so access to some small new video streaming website is just as fast as your access to youtube. Makes it so acess to Gab I'd just ad fast as Twitter. You get the idea.
>>751936271
Even if NN is repealed these sheep find out the hard way, they will still blame liberals for their slow internet speed and outrageous prices.
>>751936514
COMPETITION YOU DAMNABLE LIBBIE SCUM
>>751936027
Weird that din't happen before nn hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm makes I think
>>751935904
Mango Mussolini is not removing regulations, he's only replacing them with even more regulations that shift the protection from the public interest to his cronies' interests. That's how we MAGA in the world's greatest kleptocracy.
![child-laborrrrr[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/TBdSZUc.jpg "child-laborrrrr[1].jpg")
>>751936529
Yeah! Now is the time to get rid of all those useless regulations holding Glorious Pure Capitalismâ„¢ back.
Make Children Work Again!
Make Everyone Poor Again!
End the Weekend!
No More Days Off!
>>751936594
IT'S THE LIBBIES FAULT IN THE FIRST PLACE WITH THEIR FAILED MONOPOLIES YOU STUPID LIB FAG
>>751936529
Regulation ensures competition. Without regulation it is possible for a single company to dominate the market and if you knew anything about economics you would realize that one company can't compete with it self.
NN makes sure that a single company can't dominate the market and therefore ensures competition
>>751936564
Ted Cruz. I was hoping we would have the zodiac killer as President, but too late now.
>>751936132
There won't be competition for isp because isp have exclusive rights contracts to most areas and those contracts have nothing to do with NN. We have to remove exclusive rights to areas long before we remove NN to give other ISPs time to set up to get competition going.
>>751935996
Alle Dinge sind Gift, und nichts ist ohne Gift. Allein die Dosis macht, daß ein Ding kein Gift ist.
– Paracelsus
>>751936231
Cause nn IS REGULATION libcuck
>>751936271
Go back to plebit
>>751936809
Repealing it isn't going to make it unregulated
>>751936641
explain how no NN will ensure competition.
you just throw that word around not seeming to understand how NN or even competition work
And i'm not a lib, i just happen to be familiar with the internet since i work in the networking industry. Unlike you i base my opinion on knowledge and not political bias
>>751932893
I know this is bait but... Anyone who is against net neutrality is either being payed by the ISPs or actually retarded. Ending net neutrality doesn't promote competition, it allows companies to more easily shut down small competitors who are offering a better/cheaper product. No net neutrality will allow the ISPs would be able to prevent consumers from accessing their competitors websites. This effect isnt even limited to competition among ISPs, any company could pay the ISPs to prevent consumers from accessing their competitors websites.
>>751936704
The did the converse equivalent. They started throttling connection speeds to certain sites, which is even more jewwy and sheisty because it was done in secret to make you think the services you were paying for like netflix were shitty when it was your ISP intentionally fucking with something YOU PAID FOR.
>>751936473
>daily reminder
…that trumpkins are unemployed Russians?
>>751936958
that guy is clearly american
>>751936514
>why would they lower prizes if NN is out?
Because they could offer more value-for-money products and services by not being excessively regulated, which will start a price war.
>do you think they are not allowed to lower their prizes as is?
There's no room to. Infrastructure costs money and people's use of that infrastructure grows exponentially as the internet ages.
>Maybe you would like your ISP to offer a youtube package and then a netflix package separately and charge you different rates for different traffic and maybe completely block services that compete with their own.
If you don't like a package, don't buy it. It's called capitalism. If many people don't buy a package, they would be forced to stop offering it since it doesn't make money.
>>751936734
Very compelling argument. Why is it the liberals fault?
>>751936720
Trump is not corrupt libfag he's draining the swamp. Go back to reeeeeedit
>>751932893
Stupid americucks are still so fucking scared of communism they let anything pass.
Trump is fucking you all in the ass. Fucking stop biting the pillow and show the world you're not having it. That you are not letting billionaires rob your people with the promise of you keeping your guns and deporting mexicans.
Trump is making america irrelevant. Every trade agreement he cancels, china takes over. You are losing your place as the world's superpower...
All he wants is to increase his fortune.. on your expense.
>>751936809
The idea that regulations are bad is because they stifle competition, no? Monopolies operate on the premise of having no regulation, because they control the entire market. In this case, reducing regulation is also stifling competition because you're handing the controls over to a single entity.
>>751936732
Those are not regulations on capitalism, those are human rights/labour laws. Idiot.
>>751936809
How is neutrality, regulation? You do realize that you can't regulate the traffic on the internet through NN. That's what neutral means, you dumb fuck.
>>751936936
It's not bait and it's not paid. Trump is smart and he like I know Net Nutrality is bad for the country
>>751936704
It was happening though. It was jus getting started. Comcast and verizon. We're throttling Netflix and youtube. Those sites videos were loading slow. Paying for 100mb internet (which is more than enough for video streaming) and Netflix and youtube would take a long to load and forever to buffer. So yes faggot. It was happening and you can be sure had NN not stepped in, these ISPs would have started charging extra for access to fasterling video streaming to its customers. They were already trying to get Netflix to pay them money to make sure Netflix video reach computers more reliably.
>>751937235
They are regulating isps
>>751936936
Coming soon to an ISP near you!
http://www.eutimes.net/2017/11/kim-dotcom-to-launch-alternative-internet/
>>751936704
Fukn rekt faggot. Go kill your self jew loving nigger.
>>751937096
>drain the swamp
>by which I mean replace corrupt politicians who took bribes from big business with people who are literally employed by big business.
Now we get fucked over just as hard and our corporate overlords don't have to waste money on bribes anymore! MAGA!
>>751936735
No, regulation stifles competition. It's called "free market capitalism" for a reason, nitwit.
>>751937095
Because they are dumb
I'm convinced that people who are against NN don't actually know what it is. It's pretty obvious what ISPs will do if it's repealed.
>>751937309
They? Who is they? Need more information here anon.
>>751937335
Go back to reeeeedit.
>>751937312
I'm not a liberal
>>751937437
They are government dumbass
>>751933407
not sure if trolling or just retarded
>>751937445
After you, faggot.
>>751936946
>something YOU PAID FOR
They are using the mass-media model here. You might pay something for a magazine or a newspaper, but nothing like what it cost the publisher to produce it. The sponsors of the media pay for the content; the subscription fees that you pay merely demonstrate to those sponsors what a willing and compliant consumer you are.
>>751937031
Your argument is flawed. ISPs do not have competition. Most ISPs have exclusive rights to areas where their biggest competition is slow DSL. No competition, ISPs have no reason to lower prices. They will charge as much as they can get away with. And having the internet is required to do a lot of shit these days.
>>751937096
Hard to tell the morons from the Ruskies here. And that's how we MAGA!
>>751932893
even in the face of a common enemy that will fuck over americans, no matter what "side" they are on there is no american unity, which is why democrat or republican, you are going to get fucked over because you wont work together for a common goal, that is how nations fall its been proven throughout human history if you care to notice.
>>751937537
They are government? Who is they, you hill billy retard? Just because you know who "they" are, doesn't necessarily mean everyone else will know who "they" are.
>>751937654
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeddit is that way>
>>751937139
>All he wants is to increase his fortune.. on your expense.
Which is ironic because what little money he really has came from the Bratva.
>>751937739
Look it up I ain't going to spoon feed some bluepill
>>751937584
Source?
>>751937247
Uh! Fearless Leader smaaart! More smart than Mongo!
>>751937587
This is so wrong. A magazine costs money because they have to hire writers as well as actually print a physical document. ISPs do not generate any content (they don't need "writers"), they merely provide a means of allowing people to access content others have made and published. Nor do they have to physically "print" anything. They are strictly keepers of the cables. The cables are in the ground already, and they are not having any trouble staying afloat under net neutrality. They are still growing richer every single year, still laying cables, still hiring more and more people.
>>751932893
Net neutrality is a decent concept is implementation is shit. It's basically a way for mega corps to control content and keep smaller companies from challenging them.
In The pure sense it would be good. Outs just a title that makes you feel good.
>>751937873
Look what up? "They"? You do realize that you're making yourself out to be a complete retard, right? But then again, calling you retarded would be an insult to actual retarded people.
>>751932995
shill harder fuckface
>>751937881
its [Comment redacted. Click HERE to unlock the new and improved SaucePlzâ„¢ Package!]
>>751937774
Why do you keep mentioning Reddit? Is that on your talking-points sheet or something? I mean, the only person I know who likes Reddit is a closet faggot. Perhaps you know him?
Well, there's one Indian that gave up shitting in the street to shit on the internet.
>>751937873
And what exactly am I supposed to search? "They" conspiracy theories? Think before you type
>>751932893
The President has not said a damn word about NN. Except of course his tweet about not at all understanding what it is, before the election.
He is playing this very carefully, he knows it will easily be the one thing that could actually lose support.
All you tards thinking he supports the repeal are jumping the gun.
>>751938016
How do I look like a democrat?
>>751937918
He's got more money than you
Less dumb Americans on the web i guess. The rate will explode so much no one will be able to afford a good connection and qhile the rest of the world go foward in the age of communication your country will be throw back to the dark age.
That would be sad but since all your brains and scientists are gonna move to countries like mine i won’t shed a tear. You brought it on yourselves.
>>751938203
Is his name Obama?
>>751938280
You tell me, since I am not well versed in liberal ways and registered as a Republican.
>>751938261
He put in ajit. You know he's not stupid
>>751937996
Please explain how it allows mega-corps to control content and keep smaller companies from challenging? This is a serious inquiry. Because I have seen nothing in or about NN that allows mega-crops to do that. NN makes it so ISPs have to treat all internet traffic the same. Hard to control content if your access to a small site is just as good as a larger site.
>>751938261
Nazis and white supremacists?
>Don't care
Sexual harassment and rape charges?
>Don't care
Wasting tax dollars on vacation to his own property?
>Don't care
Panama papers mentions him over 1000 times?
>Don't care
Fat, 4th grade speaking level, ketchup on steak
>Don't care
Repeal Net Neutrality?
>GOOD BYE SWEET PRINCE
>>751938530
Who did you vote for?
>>751938613
Libcuck
>>751933076
Good for consumers? Environment? Country? Or you mean good for the cooperations.
>>751938560
Ajit has been around since the Obama administration.
>>He has served in various positions at the FCC since being appointed to the commission by President Barack Obama in May 2012, at the recommendation of Mitch McConnell. He was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on May 7, 2012,[1] and was sworn in on May 14, 2012, for a five-year term.[2]Ajit has been serving his term, since Obama was president.
He has served in various positions at the FCC since being appointed to the commission by President Barack Obama in May 2012, at the recommendation of Mitch McConnell. He was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate on May 7, 2012,[1] and was sworn in on May 14, 2012, for a five-year term.[2]
>>751938560
Unfortunately this is true.
He won't EVER say anything.
And his supporters can safely say he never did support the repeal, and their faith will continue to grow.
>>751937964
That's the thing about modelling. If the old technology and the new technology share the same causalities, then it makes sense to apply the old technology's model to the new one -- all the linkages are in place, you don't have to reinvent the wheel. But if the old technology only looks like it shares the same causalities, then the imposition of its model on the new one is most likely intended to give preferment and advantage to the special interests behind the fallacy.
We ought to create an annual award in honor of Ajit Pai, perhaps a gold-plated cow patty with his name attached.
>>751938076
I'm not American. Can you give me a Free World Sauce?
>>751933076
are you suggesting I should trust the likes of Comcast and Verizon?
>>751932893
All you trolls pretending netnutality is good make me laugh. I garuntee not a single one of you called a representative. I told mine to REPEAL it!
>>751938626
>>751936753
Like I told the anon from earlier, I voted red in a red state. Seems to me that you're grasping at the hope that I voted Democrat. Shame, such a shame.
>>751938261
Probably because "neutrality" is hard for him to pronounce. You remember, like with "diversity".
Fortunately for you, he has an assistant to write some of his tweets.
Make Giant ISP Corporations Great Again!
>>751938965
And what is your issue with NN? Don't like ISPs being forced to treat your porn browsing habits the same as any other site?
>>751934956
thats a picture. not an argument.
do you not understand English by choice or stupidity?
I hope they kill net neutrality. The Internet is too commercialized and dependent on advertisements.
>>751936091
you're probably right
>>751938965
Yeeaaaahhhhh that's what I though. When challenged about what you people don't like about NN, you either don't have a reason or your reason is easily debunked.
>>751936574
This post. This is the future of internet.
A big department store where you have to pay for any retarded shit.
>Now internet is family friendly!
>Buy the porn pack for download porn from Brazzers
>>751939351
and allowing ISPs to charge more or less for specific services is supposed to fix that?
>>751937309
good. isps are monopolistic cocksuckers
>>751938685
Faggot shill. Lol I'm not even that guy. May your anus develop tastebuds
>>751933407
Reagan expanded the us government as well as its deficit by more than any president in history except maybe fdr. Why are you such a cuck?
>>fucks your white women
>>anally rapes consumers at the expense of his corporate masters
>>MAGA
>>751940054
yes but trump.
what don't you understand about this?
>>751935167
This article supports neither position. Thier still is no good reason to repeal from what I've seen. Fortune just states that it's either the isp or the websites that will pay for the data. I prefer the isp to and this way we have laws that block prioritization, which will help prevent monopolies.
>>751932893
there's no reason to be against net neutrality unless you're an ISP, a paid shill, hostile foreign entity or a goddamn fucking idiot.
Wanna see what no net neutrality would go? Go look at Sweden. They have tiered pricing now with access only to specific sites in different tiers. $20 for a 3 day pass to use the internet.
>>751937004
Note the cuckoo clock behind him. Also the painting that was blurred judiciously -- he didn't get that frame from Kmart.
>>751940108
>>b-b-b-but what about Trump?
Spoken like a true sheep.
>>751939676
I can tell you don't know what net neutrality is, because you're parroting that talking point.
>>751937774
GOD HATES NET NEUTRALITY
>>751936132
Actually NN blocks media companies from merging so if you repeal it comcast will probably completely take over most forms of media, causing thousands of companies to shut down because they can't compete with the monolithic comcast media empire.
>>751938261
So you're a liar.
>>751940284
I can tell you don't know what net neutrality is, because you think it doesn't stop ISPs from fucking you in the ass.
>>751934198
Soros shill
>>751938401
belief ≠reality
>>751940284
>>I can tell that you don't know my definition of NN from what I've heard on infowars.
Ironically, Alex used to be the guy that exposed the Bohemian Grove meetings until he found out there was more money to be made in the idiotic conservative audience that believed his insane conspiracies.
>>751940812
to be fair they're already fucking us in the ass so maybe it's difficult to notice that they're grabbing a larger dildo
>>751940812
>implying they don't already fuck us in the ass
They can already charge you whatever the fuck they want.
An end to net neutrality means that companies like Netflix are going to have to pay more, not consumers. Will Netflix raise their prices? Possibly, but it will be bad for their business.
>>751936641
NN helps competition.
Here's a scenario.
NN is repealed so now netflix subscription prices increase because they are charged for the traffic they generate. People cancel thier subscriptions and go back to cable as the ISP'S wanted all along. Now since netflix is less competitive the isp's are free to increase thier rates to match with the conpetition.
Repeal of NN is just a way to extract more cash from the consumers at the expense of the dot com companies. The isp's will never upgrade thier infrastructure when they can scam more money from consumers by giving money to Washington.
Former FCC chair published an article on brookings outlining how the repeal of net neutrality is in no shape or form beneficial to consumers.
>>751941070
Consumers WILL pay more. Give it time and there will be tiered package pricing. They already do that shit over in Sweden. Wouldn't take long, just a few years.
>>751932893
You guys deserve to have your internet crippled for corporate interests tbh.
>>751938401
so does a vegetable with rich parents. so is that vegetable better than me?
>>751941204
Tiered packages ALREADY EXIST. I had a choice between 1 Mbsp, 2Mbsp, 4 MBsp, etc.
>>751941070
oh that's cute how naive you are.
they will just charge twice: netflix and you, then netflix will have to raise their price and again you'll be the dumb one.
>>751932893
if net neutrality goes away, they're going to delete 4chan. guaranteed.
Trump's a dick.
>>751937996
>>751938608
Still waiting for an answer. Or you don't actually know how that would happen? Fucking faggot.
>>751941289
that's the connection speed.
now add tiered packages for page/feature access to that, like cable companies do it.
>>751941359
you still haven't realized you're talking to trolls?
>>751941455
An end to net neutrality does NOT mean that they can block access to websites unless you pay. It's merely a slow lane which ALREADY exists.
>>751941070
Credit cards do this. Yeah different type of market, but the same principle here. principle being if they can double charge , they will. Credit card companies charge stores to use card swipe machine, and credit card companies also charge credit card users. Yes ISP will double charge. Charge sites like Netflix for fast lane to consumers, and charge consumers a fast lane to Netflix. You're really fucking naive if you think that wont happen. Greed is fucking human nature and ISP are sure as shit greedy.
>>751941301
If they try that, then there is going to be a class action lawsuit. They won't get away with it. We need these kinds of precedents set and ending net neutrality actually gets a lot of gears turning. We'll have more rights by the time its all over with.
>>751941493
Ajit Pai is from a Brahmin family. His father was Agitprop.
>>751941289
Yes they do. You really want what sites you can access to also be tiered?
>>751941501
it takes away the regulations and possible punishments for doing so.
if NN goes away ISPs will abuse their power and if you have no choice then one or just two ISPs in your region you're FUCKED.
just. support. and. keep. NN. alive.
we don't have to speculate what they can or will do...just keep the fucking NN alive.
>>751941689
Yes they will get away with it. Other companies (credit card companies biggest example) already get away with it, so why do you think ISPs wouldn't get away with it to?
>>751941728
They're not going to block access to websites based on what tier you subscribe to. That's not what an end to net neutrality means. The "neutral" is referring to the prioritization of packets. Keyword: prioritization. The packets can't be blocked by your ISP unless they contain illegal content.
>>751938896
Who says you HAVE to trust them? Comcast and Verison don't have a monopoly on guns and force.
>>751941834
http://i.4cdn.org/b/1511559926778.jpg
Trolls can't meme.
>>751941826
They would either outright block access to websites or slow access to the sites down so much its not even worth trying to use those sites. It wouldn't happen immediately after NN is repealed, but give it a few years and you will see it start happening.
49.99 tog et access to these sites. 69.99 to get access to these sites plus the 49.99 packes. This site costs and extra $5 to access. $10 to access to this site. Cable companies already do this ins ISP's in sweden already do this because they can. $20 for a 3 day pass with access to only certain sites.
>>751941834
that might be the worst try at a meme comic i have ever seen.
and completely false.
and painting comcast and verizon as saviors against 'bad' netflix is a huge joke, just not a funny one...
>>751941749
>>751941822
Having a credit card isn't a basic human necessity. Our society is increasingly dependent on the Internet and many things can ONLY be done online now. If they block access to certain websites or charge more, there is going to be a lawsuit that will open the Internet up for once and for all. Obama's regulation is just a band-aid.
>>751942123
Its just an example of what happens in another industry can sure as hell happen in another.
>>751942123
the internet might be a basic human necessity by now but some sites surely aren't, that's a pretty weak argument.
they can and will block them or slow them to a halt, especially if they support a similar site.
>>751933076
I'm>>751932995
>>751932995
>>751932893
Shillposting, just look at it.
>>751942078
>>751942318
Here's what will actually happen:
Access to the Internet will finally become free. Just like how companies offered during dial-up days. Remember Net Zero? You will see a return to that. This will be the ad-driven Internet that you know today. You will get access to the ENTIRE Internet, but like dial-up, it will be useless for games and media (which is how it should be). Packets can not and will not be blocked whatsoever. This way people can register for classes, fill out paperwork for a loan, do their taxes, etc. which they need to be able to do for free since it's a basic human necessity at this point. You should be upset that you have to pay to do this ALREADY -- unless you go to the library, of course. But you don't complain because you pay your bill so you can get access to all the free things that the Internet currently has to offer like pirating games and movies, you nigger.
If you want Steam, Netflix, etc., then you have to pay. This is a good thing. Those services will improve and we'll see the beginning of truly high-speed Internet in this country. Google Fiber will see more demand. They will expand their infrastructure. There will be more competition for lower prices and better speeds.
>>751932893
Ajit Pai? More like eatshit die!
>>751933076
>oversite
Ay yup!
>>751943194
and rain will turn into chocolate, rivers into honey and milk and all religions will live in peace together forever and ever.
holly shit how fucking naive are you.
>>751935298
Because what this guy says about anything is remotely true...
>>751941070
>They can already charge you whatever the fuck they want.
No they can't - FCC oversights protect this.
>>751943508
Nice rebuttal. Looks like you've lost the argument.
>>751943194
>the Internet will finally become free
Free! Free! Free!
Free to be you and Marlo Thomas.
>>751932893
Poo on tubes
>>751943656
You mean the FCC that is currently being run by an industry insider? Yeah, that makes sense.
>>751943661
makes no sense arguing insanity, the other guy and i already told you several times what might happen, how other industries handle it and even how other countries without NN handle it so yeah...
>>751943816
ISP's cannot currently charge "whatever they want." That is illegal.
>>751943979
Why, because of some commie regulation?
AM I THE ONLY ONE AROUND HERE
who unironically wants Net Neutrality to fucking die specifically because doing so will apparently get rid of all these cancerous, addicting websites like 4chan and reddit and we can be free?
>>751944072
Yes. So you agree that the original statement was false. Thank you.
>>751943194
If you believe that bollocks, then boy oh boy have I got a deal for you. I got a lovely bridge for sale. I've nicknamed it the great golden gate bridge. I'll sell it to you for only $10,000. You'll make your money back in no time by charging a toll. Fucling naive retard.
>>751944149
there is a part of me that wants that yes
>>751944216
You sound like a nigger that is angry that you might no longer be able to pirate movies, music, video games, porn, etc. You're going to have to become a paying customer again like back in the good ol' days of physical media, and it's got you real fucking worried, nigger.
I hope they make that shit so expensive that only us white people with real jobs can afford it. The fewer niggers on the Internet, the better.
>>751943194
In who's hands do you trust this to happen? Do you think Comcast and Verizon are going to do this without fucking you over like they're doing now? Do you think they're just going to suddenly give us access to this shit free of charge? What could possibly give you a reason to trust any politician or large corporation in this day and age, even Google?
>>751944149
Wow. That is the first legitimate reason I can actually respect. There's truth and reality to your reason. Still wouldn't want NN to go away but I can at least respect your argument.
>>751935881
>shilling this hard.
>>751944414
Let me ask you, if the prices go up and you can't afford it anymore, how is it going to affect you?
>>751944389
Oh okay this guy's just a retard.
>>751944604
Keep crying, nigger.
>>751935881
I hope you're trolling.
>>751944389
No I'm the bigger fool who actually pays for all my content and want NN to stay so I can have equal access to all the services not owned by the ISPs that I am already paying for.
>>751944604
Inb4 he gets uppity and calls you a nigger again
>>751936115
This.
>>751944538
Without NN, how would ISPs being allowed to treat the internet like cable television be better? Because thas what would happen tiered pricing to access certain websites.
Fucking idiots all of you it's not net neutrality its title 2 get educated on what's actually happening you fucking retards. Side note just because a government calls it that doesn't mean that's what it is.
>>751944869
too late
>>751944651
>>751944389
calling someone an angry nigger and then going on this little racist tantrum really doesn't speak well for you.
but you know that and you do not care. just spew your racist, retarded shit around here, in the real world nobody cares about you and what you think anyway.
>>751944731
Well, look at it this way, there's a lot of people out there who are pirating the products you're lawfully paying for, and this will allow the ISP to finally crack down on it.
>>751944918
What's wrong with cable television? I pay the bill and I get access to shows like GoT and Breaking Bad. And I don't have to listen to poor people talk about it because they can't afford it.
>>751944986
Doesn't excuse all of the other problems with repealing net neutrality
>>751944961
Say bye-bye to all the free shit you're stealing.
>>751945099
non-argument
>>751944961
This. You can usually tell if someone spent most high school lunches alone by how quickly they throw out "nigger" as an argument. It's the most autistic form of ad hominem.
>>751932893
This whole thread...
Not one real point supporting the repeal of NN.
Wishful thinking doesn't count.
>>751932893
I'ts been a long time since the last "You cringe you lose" thread.
>>751932893
it's so funny watching you all fuck yourselves
>>751945307
>found the nigger
>>751945099
>implying
weak argument
>>751945307
I use the term nigger liberally amongst my friends, black or otherwise. We have a mutual understanding that the term is never to be used when we truly mean to insult someone but rather should only be used sarcastically.
>>751933407
stupid ass mothafucka
>>751945457
This isn't going to just fuck the US.
>>751945136
Now that you can't steal entertainment, what are you going to do? You're going to have to do poor things again, right? Are you ready for that? What's it going to be like overhearing your coworkers talk about the newest video game or movie you can't afford? I bet you're going to feel left out, huh?
>>751945665
What's wrong with you?
>>751945665
non-argument
>>751944986
Ok, how does NN prevent ISPs from cracking down on users pirating content?
>>751945665
Did a poor nigger fuck your wife or something? Why the fuck are you so mad at poor people?
>>751945572
Very true, but you also have the drumpf in office.
>>751945798
It doesn't. Fucking retarded irrelevant non-argument
>>751945665
your strawman is on fire
>>751945717
>>751945727
>>751945827
You're going to have to start choosing what kind of entertainment purchase you want to make and learn to make it last. Remember when you had to play the same game or watch the same movie over and over? It's going to be like that again.
>>751945798
It will allow them to identify traffic (such as the traffic being used by the BitTorrent protocol) and block it.
>>751945798
Comcast was blocking service to PTP websites. With net neutrality, they cant. 0
>>751945864
My thoughts exactly. But if the faggot wants to make the argument, he's gotta defend it. So I wanna see him try and defend a failed argument.
>>751945542
Same here my guy, most of my friends never even bothered saying it till I called myself one in front of them. I think the taboo nature of the word needs to die if anything, I've called my white friends niggers before, it just when someone pulls it out in an argument that it just shows how upset they are.
>>751934198
Strawman harder.
>>751946026
Net neutrality is about treating all packets as equal. Without it, they can block packets that are being transferred via, for example, the BitTorrrent protocol.
>>751946007
What the fuck are talking about? I don't steal games. I just want to be able to download the ones I have bought at a reasonable speed without having my speeds cut or being charged extra.
