>yes goyim, let us here at comcast slow your internet speeds for websites we don't want you going on. don't worry though, daddy trump is in favor of it and you can't disagree with daddy trump, can you? i thought not.
>>751886232
Source?
>>751886326
Just search up net neutrality retard, its not that hard to make your own research
>>751887460
>I will insult people into believing me instead of posting a reliable source
>retard
the irony
he didnt even disagree with you KEK
Fuck off back to pol u fucking pimply fatloser
I dont care about those shitty internet metering routers .> real hackers solve their own tech problems.
>>751887824
This.
>Tfw 4chan will get shut down
Rip
>>751886232
Remember before 2015 when there was no net neutrality? For 30 years, you had to pay for individual sites? You had to pay a gaming fee, a video fee, and a social media fee? Remember how bad you felt when your Twitter free trial ended?
Jesus, fucking Christ, people...
You actually want the internet regulated by the government instead of the people?
>>751887631
This ignorance is astounding.
>>751887824
>>751888908
Cucks.
>>751889003
There was though much litigation protecting it though
Also for anyone who tells you that "Net Neutrality is solving a problem that doesn't exist"... or anything along those lines:
Here's a brief history on what the internet companies were doing that triggered Net Neutrality to be put in place:
MADISON RIVER: In 2005, North Carolina ISP Madison River Communications blocked the voice-over-internet protocol (VOIP) service Vonage. Vonage filed a complaint with the FCC after receiving a slew of customer complaints. The FCC stepped in to sanction Madison River and prevent further blocking, but it lacks the authority to stop this kind of abuse today.
COMCAST: In 2005, the nation’s largest ISP, Comcast, began secretly blocking peer-to-peer technologies that its customers were using over its network. Users of services like BitTorrent and Gnutella were unable to connect to these services. 2007 investigations from the Associated Press, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and others confirmed that Comcast was indeed blocking or slowing file-sharing applications without disclosing this fact to its customers.
TELUS: In 2005, Canada’s second-largest telecommunications company, Telus, began blocking access to a server that hosted a website supporting a labor strike against the company. Researchers at Harvard and the University of Toronto found that this action resulted in Telus blocking an additional 766 unrelated sites.
AT&T: From 2007–2009, AT&T forced Apple to block Skype and other competing VOIP phone services on the iPhone. The wireless provider wanted to prevent iPhone users from using any application that would allow them to make calls on such “over-the-top” voice services. The Google Voice app received similar treatment from carriers like AT&T when it came on the scene in 2009.
>theres more. much much more
>>751889454
WINDSTREAM: In 2010, Windstream Communications, a DSL provider with more than 1 million customers at the time, copped to hijacking user-search queries made using the Google toolbar within Firefox. Users who believed they had set the browser to the search engine of their choice were redirected to Windstream’s own search portal and results.
MetroPCS: In 2011, MetroPCS, at the time one of the top-five U.S. wireless carriers, announced plans to block streaming video over its 4G network from all sources except YouTube. MetroPCS then threw its weight behind Verizon’s court challenge against the FCC’s 2010 open internet ruling, hoping that rejection of the agency’s authority would allow the company to continue its anti-consumer practices.
PAXFIRE: In 2011, the Electronic Frontier Foundation found that several small ISPs were redirecting search queries via the vendor Paxfire. The ISPs identified in the initial Electronic Frontier Foundation report included Cavalier, Cogent, Frontier, Fuse, DirecPC, RCN and Wide Open West. Paxfire would intercept a person’s search request at Bing and Yahoo and redirect it to another page. By skipping over the search service’s results, the participating ISPs would collect referral fees for delivering users to select websites.
AT&T, SPRINT and VERIZON: From 2011–2013, AT&T, Sprint and Verizon blocked Google Wallet, a mobile-payment system that competed with a similar service called Isis, which all three companies had a stake in developing.
EUROPE: A 2012 report from the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications found that violations of Net Neutrality affected at least one in five users in Europe. The report found that blocked or slowed connections to services like VOIP, peer-to-peer technologies, gaming applications and email were commonplace.
>>751889512
VERIZON: In 2012, the FCC caught Verizon Wireless blocking people from using tethering applications on their phones. Verizon had asked Google to remove 11 free tethering applications from the Android marketplace. These applications allowed users to circumvent Verizon’s $20 tethering fee and turn their smartphones into Wi-Fi hot spots. By blocking those applications, Verizon violated a Net Neutrality pledge it made to the FCC as a condition of the 2008 airwaves auction.
AT&T: In 2012, AT&T announced that it would disable the FaceTime video-calling app on its customers’ iPhones unless they subscribed to a more expensive text-and-voice plan. AT&T had one goal in mind: separating customers from more of their money by blocking alternatives to AT&T’s own products.
VERIZON: During oral arguments in Verizon v. FCC in 2013, judges asked whether the phone giant would favor some preferred services, content or sites over others if the court overruled the agency’s existing open internet rules. Verizon counsel Helgi Walker had this to say: “I’m authorized to state from my client today that but for these rules we would be exploring those types of arrangements.” Walker’s admission might have gone unnoticed had she not repeated it on at least five separate occasions during arguments.
>>751889003
Implying corporations are people? You cant be this retarded. The government is made up of people too. Dumb shit argument that is.
>>751886232
net neutrality is bullshit, 4chan is going to die. we won the meme war and this is how the republicans treat us
>>751889194
What a thought out insult!
>>751889454
>>751889512
>>751889547
The problem is, there's competition now. And, if some company throttles, there's others that don't and will happily accept your money. You want a slow internet? Enjoy net neutrality. Because of massive regulation, it will cost more and more for internet and the service will invariably be shit.
How do I know this?
The exact same fucking thing happened with healthcare. You know, the "affordable healthcare act". Now, due to over-regulation, insurance actually costs more and our plans SUCK. This is your government at work. The people you want to "fix" the internet.
>>751886232
pol is seriously retarded.
>>751889454
>>751889512
>>751889547
tldr shill spotted
>>751889802
>>751889793
Healthcare is totally different and has been going that route for years. Citizens united was designed to undermine government even more with the pay to play bullshit.
Also managing servers and ISP contracts doesnt require 1% of the overhead medicine has. Clearly you know very little.
>>751889900
Ahhh, Nick Cage...before he went bald. I have a theory- when he finally gets a good wig, he'll start making good movies again.
>>751889874
You're pushing for an agenda supported by corporations botnet retard.
>>751889802
It's not the best or brightest. It's the college flunkies with too much time in their parents basement. Now theyre a part time mechanic and think they know shit because they can change an alternator or some shit. Such smarts, very knowledge.
>>751890116
>t; it's the jews
>>751889992
Your chart is incomplete. Now show a current chart. You know, the one that shows the DECREASE in physicians...like how ISPs will diminish when they're regulated out of business.
>>751890201
kek. Dont forget soros, the go to for deep autism.
>>751890221
physicians arent decreasing. Theyre just not increasing at a rate to meet future/current demand. Take a statistics class and come back.
>>751890297
OK, Mr. Statistics, the number of doctors per capita is decreasing.
>>751890409
Yes thats a rate you fucking idiot. That is exactly what I said. You have no idea what it means, clearly. Wow youre retarded.
>>751890553
Show me a chart with the number of doctors and the population. 2009-20017, please.
OR, you can simply accept that government intervention into the free market typically results in higher costs and lower service quality.
>>751890681
I'm not showing you shit retard, you can look it up yourself, you fucking faggot. KYS
>>751890681
There is no such thing as a free market. Every market has constraints, especially markets that have monopolistic products (unique cures, treatments)
>>751890681
Ok Im going to spell it out. Americas population is increasing faster than physicians are increasing to meet that demand. Both numbers are still increasing, but it is the rate of increase (acceleration) that matters.
>>751890768
>>751890793
So, to be clear... you 2 actually believe that the government is better than anyone else to run the internet. After 30 years of it being open. You want it nationalized.
Fuck me, Freddy...
>>751890681
its amazing that the party of "no free handouts" believes that a market can be 'free'
>>751890847
So, more people, less doctors for them all. Kind of like less ISPs when it becomes less profitable. Got it. We're in agreement.
>>751890887
I think it cant tip too far one way or the other, hence 'regulation,' you know the third word of the 2nd amendment. (its used a bunch of times in the constitution)
>>751890982
Less ISPs? Hmm right now I have verizon or comcast, oh no how shall I choose from all these options.
>>751891095
Im fighting for net neutrality. I dont care about your autism. Israel and palestine are both full of retards like this thread.
>>751890887
Yes because trump is in office. I trust him, he is doing an amazing job so far. Only libtards disagree.
>>751891140
>>751891095
>>751891168
>>751891208
>Loses argument on net neutrality.
>Makes thread about jews to deflect
>>751886232
why should google be allowed to block things
why should youtube be allowed to block things
why should twitter be allowed to block things
why should netflix be allowed to block things
why should facebook be allowed to block things.
but not ISPs? think about it. this makes no sense.
you don't like what your ISP is blocking, or throttling. switch ISPs
but you say the ISPs have monopolies? you can blame the government for that. why are the ISPs to blame for government failure?
why doesn't the government lay its own lines, if it wants to be a public unity.
this will
>create jobs
>better America
>let ISPs do what they want, like every other private company.
>create competition
the problem here is NOT the ISPs it's the government.
>>751889003
https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history
>>751891276
You dont understand the difference in scope between an individual website and an ISP handling terrabytes of data per minute.
Pretty retarded.
>>751891354
1,000,000,000
1918
Youre retarded or a botnet pushed by an authoritarian retard. Either way this is some shooped autism.
>>751891414
kek
I cants gets me no mo free sheeeeeeit, negro! Fuggin Repukes!
>>751891545
youre a botnet
>>751889793
There literally no competition in my area and when my community tried to create our own isp we were shut down buy the single provider available here.
>>751891408
blah blah blah i have nothing to say
>>751891657
So someone spent 1/76th of the GDP on a 'jewry'
Which would be worth 244 billion today. Yeah ok there dumbass. Math just isnt your thing.
>>751891859
So what youre saying is that the jewish newspapers arent printing facts?
