S/fur Thread
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
S/fur Thread
Bump.
>>751544443
o>>751544443
so close, dude!
>>751545104
They didn't
ded
Day 82 of No Fap
Anyone got this with better resolution?
>>751547163
You could, if you would bother to look for it.
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/19332800/
now we are getting a pase!
>>751548009
Don't forget to wash your hands before pretty boy.
Those nasty microbes can do bad stuff to your pee pee.
Good bye, boring thread!
>>751551686
later, scat anon
>>751551870
Farewell. I'm actually getting a new scat pic done for me back on /trash/ so my no fap might finally end.
>>751551958
hooray! it's a mighty streak you have amassed.
>>751552071
I know. I've very proud of it. I'm not sure if I might find the pic hot enough to fap to it though. We'll have to wait and see.
>>751552128
godspeed. i dunno how you have the discipline to keep this up. maybe you should forgo fapping altogether
>>751552311
Well after No Fap September ended I told myself I'd keep going until I encountered a new good-quality hyperscat pic. And since good-quality hyperscat pics aren't frequently-made, well...
>>751552471
...you might be waiting forever, and thus shouldn't waste effort trying to find one. hah. how about that proposal. drawn anything new yet?
>>751552663
Well like, I said, getting a request done now, so maybe the waiting has paid off.
As for drawing (wait, are you the same guy I've talked to before?) I'm still working on the scat demoness request. Did I ever tell you about that one?
>>751552987
>Did I ever tell you about that one?
i'm not really sure
>wait, are you the same guy I've talked to before
i hang out here all the time, so it probably is
>>751553264
Well you know I draw so it must be you. I showed you this, right?
>>751553948
i think i've seen it posted before. are you going to colour it?
>>751553948
Muh eyes!
Da fuk, it hurts.
God!
>>751554190
Nah. It's an old request.
Come on dude, it has to be you. Who else would have talked about hyperscat and my drawings with me here?
>>751554295
That's old art. Have something newer.
>>751554712
Ok, now I'm blind.
thanks a bunch.
Dammit, windows narrator doesn't work in Chrome, I'm doomed.
>>751555199
What is you problem, fag?
>>751555199
if you liked that one so much, you should see the nsfw version
>>751554322
probably no one else. idk. you should get namesync so you can see who we are
>>751555461
Well I gotta go get some shut-eye now. I'll tell you when I get my pic delivered.
>>751555726
cool. almost time for me to do the same. cya 'round, scat anon
>>751544443
>>751544444 <--
>rip
>>751555835
Bye!
>>751557625
I have a very hard time believing they would wear clothes.
And even harder time thinking they would wear multiple layers, like underwear and pants.
That would do horrible things to fur.
>>751558664
They'd probably just wear enough to protect their fur, to keep it pretty, and also enough to protect themselves from occupational hazards.
>>751558664
i'd still wear clothes. though i've been without underwear for almost 2 decades now.
i'm out, later fur. don't drown your waifus
>>751558779
>>751558904
I think any clothing would be loose, so it wouldn't pinch and rub the fur badly.
I think it would also be only used as needed to fit in with human customs.
I'm agreeing with this anon >>751558779. They wouldn't need cloths as badly as we do and would have more trouble making and wearing them. So likely cloths would mainly be used where it's too cold to comfortably go without or to protect the fur from getting really dirty or damaged.
Underwear may still be a thing though, to protect pants / robes / whatever from the possible consequences of direct contact to privates. Don't want to have to wash pants every time she'd get wet.
>>751558664
Kilt/skirt
Sundresses
Loose fitting tops
That's pretty much what I can picture them wearing, all loose fitting, easy to move in clothing that won't rub against the fur too much.
>>751559290
I think they would only be worn to keep the humans happy.
Because humans can't handle nudity.
>>751560824
I like that one.
bump
Ugh, why don't japanese manufacturers make a pretty classic motorbike anymore...
All just super angry looking pocket-rockets.
Yamaha for instance used to have really nice cruisers and naked bikes a decade ago. Now they all look like shit. The fuck...
>>751565358
Those damn young kids.
>>751565358
Cruisers look pretty, but they're kind of sucky to ride.
>>751565431
They all look like what a 12 year old would make.
Well, the Suzuki SV650 and the Honda CB1100 still look OK. I actually like the Honda, but almost 13k will stay above my budget for a long time. And honestly I'd be fine with maybe 70HP, don't need such a big engine.
Triumph makes pretty bikes, but their reputation in terms of reliablity is a shitshow, and I'm tired of having a beatiful diva.
>>751565545
I really like mine actually, but I want something that has more than 15HP and won't spend at least 10% of the season being broken.
>tfw no snow leopard qt to brutally rape me
why even live
>>751565753
If you want a cool, fast, reliable, (sort of) cheap bike. Maybe look for a 90's to early '00's Ducati Monster.
They look vintage, and they can keep up with your buddy's R6.
SV 650 ain't a bad option either. I've owned both.
>>751566106
I'll look at those by spring or summer, when I should finally have the ressources for one.
>>751566867
Awesome! I know what it's like, that first week you go from an old crappy bike, to your first ride that has sticky tires and some real horsepower. You blow away all the other traffic when lights turn green... you catch girls looking at you... feel cool when you do your first *good* wheelie.
>>751566867
Also, have you ever considered getting a supermoto?
Judging by what you've said so far, probably not, but they're a blast. Also, you don't have to risk getting a ticket or breaking your neck to have fun with one.
>>751567315
I'm 90% sure the first wheelie will be an accident.
So far, I've had my little 125cc bike for a decade and have not even tried once.
Not that it could.
I'm just more of a cruiser when it comes to bikes. Not into going really fast, but rather taking a nice somewhat slow ride through the landscape. The reason I need something stronger is simply that it's getting on my nerves that I have to struggle to not hold up traffic on normal highways. And Autobahn sections, regardless of speed-limit or not, aren't really an option when anything above 90km/h is pure luck with wind and terrain.
>>751567604
>Also, have you ever considered getting a supermoto?
Not really, no. I like things a bit softer and more comfy. Light weight is nice though.
Slow thread is slow...
>>751567826
I think we're opposites. I haven't rode on the street for over a year because I kept getting tickets and I can't afford to lose my license.
I do enduro and motocross now.
maybe you should check out a BMW R1???-GS I owned the old R1100-GS for a few months. Very powerful, but tame. You can ride it anywhere, and it's very comfy. I made it from San Francisco to Boston in 4 days. In the desert, it held a steady cruise at 160+ km/h and even at those speeds, felt pretty... unexciting.
bump for sweet kitties
>>751568583
felines are the best
>>751568397
Funny thing, I've actually just been looking at those.
The big versions are, for now, out of reach financially. There is however one version with 310cc which is really tempting. Under 5k€ new, looks decent, 34HP (not much but enough really), good fuel-economy and very light. Definitely worth a consideration.
>>751568724
Dragons are better, though.
>>751568740
Didn't even know those existed, I just image searched it now.
they look dope.
New thread?
Anyone?
