ok
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
ok
https://psychology-tools.com/empathy-quotient/
What is this?
autism meter i guess
Don't receive any empathy, don't give any empathy.
>>713375091
good life lessons
>>713375179
My white horse is in the stable all summer and winter long, prince can't ride if this world doesn't wants to be saved.
>>713374785
Accordibn to this I have 43/80 which is fucking BS, i feel insane amounts of empathy, I wish i could not give a fuck like most other people.
12 reporting in
26
>do I have to become a ponyfag now?
pretty accurate, considering I'm legitimately a sperglord
35?
somehow 18/80 - lmao
>normie
15/80
Well that's not good.
edge
19 these lying arseholes are full of shit I emphithise the shit outa bitches
>>713374785
>Inb4 autismos start thinking their low "empathy" score makes them Hannibal Lecter instead of just tards who don't know how conversations work
I got 32, although I know I have Asperger's.
Probably because I've learned how people can feel and act on that, rather than 'feel' what people feel in most situations.
>>713374785
mongoloid lider
>>713375857
not mongoloid
>>713376879
mongoloid
>>713377220
not mongoloid
>>713377303
mongoloid
>>713377480
sighly mingoloid
>>713377069
kek same
>>713377480
>what is assburgers?
>>713377069
>>713377762
mongoloids twins
>>713374785
26, but I think that has more to due with being an INTJ than anything else.
>>713378105
thanks xD
>>713377480
>.
how about irony and sarcasm? Do you understand when someone are being ironic and if yes, do you find those jokes funny?
>>713377567
>mongoloid
wooden club master race. I can solve any problem by bashing it over the head with a fucking branch. Even crippling depression.
Hold me?
Got a 62. My empathy is bumming me out. Empathy is good for thinking about other people. But all it does is makes you sad. Its better to focus on yourself /b/ros
>>713378657
why is that bothering you ?
Lower end of normal
I care, I just don't have time generally for people's bullshit
Yay?
I scored thirty but after extensive self reflection and research child abuse and home life I cheesburger
>>713378488
Some of the time, and some of the time. I understand sarcasm better than irony.
Generally, the things I find funny are hard to explain to others because I just get it. Like my head is wired differently to theirs or something.
39
surprised
thought it'd be higher
>>713375049
>>713374785
No, you retard. There are many disorders that result in low empathy, including e.g. sociopathy and schizofrenia. Autism is just a possible option.
Got 55. Am I really the most normal one here? Shit.
Scored a 4
Knew it was bad but not this bad.
28
i dont think im retarded
i just dont give a fuck about anyone
How fucked am I ?
>>713384168
as fucked as the poor idiot charging his phone with this adapter ?
>>713374785
Sup /b/?
>>713384168
>>713384589
LMAO XDddddd, almost twinsies!
So, what ethical schools do you follow, and to what degree?
I'm MOSTLY Utilitarian (Act), followed by Contract Ethics (which, sometimes supersedes it).
I do have a few Kantian beliefs, though, but only for certain things.
>>713374785
result from last thread sample of about 140-150 people
Borderline sperg
Pretty accurate results
>>713383634
NORMIES GTFO REEEEEEEEEEEE
Wow, I really feel bad for you guys!
>Your Empathy Quotient score was 39 out of a possible 80.
Scores above 30 are generally not indicitive of an Autism Spectrum disorder.
damn, I always joked that I had aspergers
But I have reached normie stats in live
>>713386493
What's there to FEEL bad about?!
>Ahahahahha!
See what I did there?
LMAO XDddddd
>MFW: Seeing that post actually made me smile, lmfao
Guess its true
>>713386755
same with autism
Christ, this isn't surprising. A huge bunch of fucking spergs.
P.S. I supported Trump.
>>713383325
I don't mean to trigger you, but are you by chance an SJW?
Yeah, kinda expected this...
Anyway, you're all normies
>>713374785
Oh
>>713388386
>Christ, this isn't surprising
No it's not.
>P.S. I supported Trump.
So?
So did I:
>>713384589
Well, to be fair, he's not the best, but at least he's not a complete piece of shit like Hillary. Also, I don't want war with Russia.
I just wanna be clear for a few more years before I leave.
>>713388580
But... it'd be funny if you triggered him
>>713388689
But... I only got 11...
>>713388466
nice feet
>>713374785
Oh well.
Fuck... I find myself jealous that there are people with LOWER scores than me.
Dammit.
>>713388733
Doesn't matter, anyone who isn't me must be a normie, you can't tell me otherwise unless you get less than atleast 6 good boy points by answering honestly
>>713385743
Who the fuck does that faggot scoring 68 think he is?
22
> Be me
> Feel more autistic everyday.
> Decide "Fuck it" and do one of these
> Answer honestly
> 22
> Do another one
> "Likely autistic."
> FML. Ask one of my IRL friends to do it
> "Not autistic"
> Ask all my friends
> "Not autistic."
> Am I autistic? My mom got me tested when I was a child but they said no then, can you grow into it?
Do I have autism?
>>713389254
you are autistic bc u even care what others think
15, not a surprise, really.
>>713389302
Nah, you're retarded, there's a difference
>>713374785
lol who cares? oh wait is that showing i dont have empathy? oh well who cares? oh wait is that proving i dont have empathy? lol who cares....
>>713389036
>you get less than atleast 6 good boy points by answering honestly
>6 good boy points
Do you mean 6/80 on test??
>by answering honestly
wait... on the test??? Or... what?
If you're saying I didn't answer honestly, that's incorrect. I answered to the best of my ability, based on the fact that there were only 4 possible choices per question.
5 would have been necessary to get more valid responses, and 7 would have been necessary for higher accuracy.
I had to estimate on several, because I fall mostly in the center of this.
>>713374785
i believe scoring low on this test should be a way of measuring your ability to think logically, a low score is a good thing you shitters. its a fucking reverse IQ test
>>713388897
8 is pretty bad.
>>713388580
SJW's are the last people to feel empathy.
They are controlling and want to use pseudo emotional nonsense to push agendas.
They are moral and ideological freaks.
Empathy is not a weakness, it can be a powerful tool and is nothing to do with SJWs.
For example, I scored 65, I work as a magican and i use this natural empathy to manipulate others thoughts and feelings to the ends i require.
Those of you who seem to think it is a positive thing to have low empathy are essentially saying that you are unable to assess the environment you live in. It's a form of blindness.
>>713389569
Didn't say you were lying, just saying I classify anyone who doesn't get less than 6/80 as a normie
Well then, shouldnt we just make like 100 answers to increase diversity in answers ? It's not supposed to be super accurate, just a general conclusion
Just put slightly agree if you're a middle guy
>>713389680
Nonsense.
Logic and emotion are not contrary nor opposite ends of a spectrum.
In fact logic is incomplete without the ability to logically assess the emotional landscape of a situation.
I consider emotions to be the equivalent of the lighting of a room. It can be the same room but may appear very different depending on the lighting. This has to be considered in any complete logical assessment of a situation involving human beings.
Understanding emotions does not equal being a slave to them. In fact, I'd say it's the opposite.
Those lacking in empathy are probably the sort of people who are least able to control their emotions when they do arise.
>>713390106
To add to this, Carl Sagan is a fine example of a very logical man who grasped the subtleties and importance of human emotions.
>>713374785
I got 9
>>713390106
Emotion should carry wait in an argument? Nah, I'm good
>>713390106
but using logic i could get any score i want on this test, logical thinking trumps emotional thinking. this test is a joke and you should feel bad for thinking there is any validity in it, a person with autism or Aspergers is capable of only deductive reasoning (sherlock holmes). what score do you want my dude? i can give you a 0 if you like, it wont mean i lack empathy it will simply mean i can understand the underlying direction each question is taking.
Got 44.
>People often tell me that I went too far in driving my point home in a discussion
This all the time though, fuck this if somebody's obviously wrong about something and won't admit it I always go savage mode, no matter the social consequences.
>>713390379
That depends on what you are arguing about.
If it's a discussion on mathematics, science, or any practical aspect of life where emotion is irrelevant then obviously not, if it's a discussion on a shared living space, a relationship, the care of the elderly or any number of other things - then of course it should.
It's also vitally important for those in the sciences to grasp how best to raise funds for their research. So having a basic understanding of how to appeal to the masses could mean the difference between funding an important project or not.
>mfw actually have aspergers
>No fucks given
>>713390721
no logical thinking still trumps emotional thinking in all of those shitty examples you gave me for their benefit. coddling people and telling them their feelings matter in the grand scheme of things is how you grow hillary supporters.
>>713375818
Delusions of grandeur, could you save the world if the world asked you to?
>>713390594
Who said I gave the test validity. I'm arguing on the relevance of being able to understand the emotions of others.
Anyone with half a brain cell can fake a multiple choice test to get the results they want. It's not rocket science. Don't flatter yourself into thinking you're some kind of Holmes character just because you can't understand subtle social cues, the effect of others moods on their decision making and body language.
>>713390721
yea cuz Steve Jobs used his EMOTIONAL intelligence to grow his company, and Bill Gates too, get fucked you stupid commie, no one thinks your emotions matter.
I got 44
>>713390845
I disagree. That was pandering to stupidity and lowest common denominators.
Personally, I agree that logic is a more refined tool, and it is illogical to ignore an innate human trait that can override logic.
The areas of the brain responsible for emotional responses are far older and more ingrained in us than the relatively new abilities of logical and deductive reasoning.
To ignore this is to be illogical.
>>713390994
I think they both used government developed technology tbh
>>713390916
Im not holmes, im saying the character clearly had asbergers to be able to pull off his observational deductions at the level he did while also being socially awkward and needing a watson around to appear normal, and i think you missed the point when i said ANY score you want, i can give you a 0 or an 80 ill even film it for and explain my reasoning. emotional intelligence is the participation trophy for someone that scored low on an IQ test, get the fuck over it.
>>713390994
Haha, Steve Jobs played to people's emotions on an almost daily basis. The entire marketing strategy of Apple has always been to appeal to the emotions, fashion and self-identity of customers.
It's exactly what separates Apple from Microsoft. The latter having an almost laughable ability to get it wrong at every turn.
57
24
did not expect that
>>713385743
empathy tests don't directly causate with autism
it is just shown that autists have lower empathy scores
>>713391161
i was speaking more in terms of knowing how to market their products and services, which >>713391145
this faggot was able to answer for me, while simultaneously not seeing that being able to pander to the idiots and lowest common denoms is a PRIME EXAMPLE of logical deduction. this is hilarious.
>>713391341
yes he did play to their emotions AFTER LOGICALLY DEDUCING THEY WERE SLAVES TO THEM. ROFLMAO.
>>713390031
>Didn't say you were lying, just saying I classify anyone who doesn't get less than 6/80 as a normie
Oh... I disagree with the magnitude, but I guess, whatever.
>Just put slightly agree if you're a middle guy
Yeah, that's what I had for the most part, mostly slightly dis/agree
>>713390106
>This has to be considered in any complete logical assessment of a situation involving human beings.
No, human beings should just be more logical.
>Those lacking in empathy are probably the sort of people who are least able to control their emotions when they do arise.
You have to really fuck with me to make me lose it. And most of the time, I'm just straight emotionless (unless anxiety is an emotion)
BTW, since you're so good at emotions, what is the emotion associated with "funny" called?
>>713390379
*weight
>>713390721
>shared living space
That's a moderately fair example, I'll give you. Though my OCD and shit is more anxiety and logical handling, so I'm not sure. Unless anxiety can be considered an emotion.
>relationship
Why would you get together with anyone you can't connect to on several levels, specifically things like ideologies, common interests and/or goals, and other stuff? Emotions are only temporary, so you really gotta get together with someone who is logically compatible on several scales.
>care of the elderly
This makes sense, though, I'll admit.
>It's also vitally important for those in the sciences to grasp how best to raise funds for their research
Make products people want and/or are stupid enough to buy.
>money
Manage resulting funds in a financial initiative
>No more money problems.
>ALL THE RESEARCH!
That's how I plan to do it
>>713391341
Apple is manipulative and evil. They don't stay true to the UNIX philosophy, and they overcharge for technology.
The best way to appeal to a sense of self is to allow the self to create the system.
>Not saying Windows is better. It's shit, and I'm pissed I still have it.
I wanna switch to BSD
>>713391341
I bet you think actors in movies actually cry too, this is fucking pathetic.
>>713391686
>being this proven wrong
>not wanting to admit it
>>713389254
You can only 'grow' into autism when very young, because it develops when the synapses of your brain are still connecting and wiring themselves
unless you've had a stroke, once you are diagnosed not to have autism you can't exactly grow into it
35/empathy
>>713391837
how have you proven me wrong? you argued for me, if you cant see that you must have scored an 80 on this test legitimately.
>>713374880
thanks for wasting my time
>to receive your results, please enter your phone number
>>713391569
And you decided on that conclusion why?
It is absolutely obvious that it's a prime example, that doesn't in anyway negate my main point that the importance of understanding empathy is important in making a more all-encompassing logical conclusion.
Are you people really making the statement that less understanding in one area equals more understanding in another?
Is it not more likely that someone with both empathy and logic is going to have more tools and understanding that someone with only logic or emotion?
High empathy does not equate to low logic.
Low empathy does not equate to high logic.
It's an invalid assumption and the people here shouting in pride that they have low empathy are assuming the above is true, when in reality they could be both emotionally stupid and lacking in basic logic at the same time.
>>713391772
Eh, if you disagree with my standard that's alright,
I hope when they did made that test they weighted persons outcome and tested for autism after to find that average, if they didn't, that would be idiotic
Also, hey! Corr3cting m3? Just because of my wait? Rude~
I got 39.
Rip
>>713391686
And your evidence that he logically deduced this is what?
For those of us with higher empathy, we can sidestep that process with an innate understanding of this.
That doesn't mean that we cannot also understand this logically.
This is the difference between guys who are naturally good with women, and those who are awkward.
You may be able to learn how to say the right things and do it via logic - but you'll never have the ease and speed of someone who naturally has the intuition that empathy provides.
Yes empathy can be faked via logic, but those who are both logical and empathic have an advantage of not needing to fake these things. It gives them a speed and a natural flair that others don't have.
Certified Autist here. The test works
amidoingitrite
>>713392084
im arguing that people who decide thinking emotionally is the highest accolade you can achieve in your thought process let their logical thinking atrophy, understanding emotional thinking and USING it for or against yourself or others is 2 separate things and at the end of the day the world would be better off if emotionally thinking and the very notion of it simply did not exist at all. and you cannot categorically make a claim for the reverse.
This is absolute trite. I dont even think autism is real since it has such a broad definition
>>713383325
you feel too much,faggot
Shait
Alright /b/, let's see those results and see where our average /b/tard lies
http://www.strawpoll.me/11756780
>>713391788
You're having a very strong reaction for someone who claims that emotions are irrelevant.
That's just a strawman and it's barely worth arguing.
However, I could easily point out that I have several friends who are actors, and many of them, the more successful ones, when they need to cry or demonstrate an emotion on screen or stage, will try to induce that emotion through a memory of an event that will bring it on.
Why do they do this?
Because they know that a genuine emotional response is going to be much more natural and believable than a faked one.
Which is the entire point i'm making.
Having empathy is not a sign of weakness, it can be a short-cut and a strength that can bolster logic past those who are lacking in basic social and emotional skills.
>>713392381
>This is the difference between guys who are naturally good with women, and those who are awkward.
Relationships should be based on logical compatibility.
>It gives them a speed and a natural flair that others don't have.
Why do people care about "flair"? It's only important whether or not it works...
This is what you faggots are so confusing about...
>>713392647
lol keep telling yourself that my man.
>>713392708
Because what works in these regards is almost always a natural mastery of the emotional responses that you are invoking in someone else.
If you are lacking empathy, then you have no ability to grasp or to change tactic when the girl you're talking to is obviously thinking you're an autistic freak.
>>713381219
The test is bullshit tho, I have Antisocial and Schizoid personallity and can tell
>>713380444
Ayy same, though I'm not a diagnosed sperglord I'm just socially retarded
I did the test twice to be sure I did it right btw, got 17 and 22
>>713392647
>You're having a very strong reaction for someone who claims that emotions are irrelevant.
Not him, but it causes a fuckton of cognitive dissonance... That's very anxiety-provoking.
And I don't think anyone said emotions are "irrelevant", just that society puts WAY TOO MUCH weight on them as opposed to thinking logically
>>713392819
Ok I will,
I'll continue to believe that those with both logic and empathy are better off than those with only logic or only empathy.
Jesus you're an idiot.
This is like arguing that a man with only one left leg is better off than a man with only a right leg.
I'm saying, having both legs is, obviously, better.
>>713374785
rolling for 9001
>>713389236
too high of empathy makes a cuck
ITT: People believing a 60 question yes-or-no test can diagnose autism.
53 of 80. I don't know why I'm taking this though, I'm naturally able to do what amounts to mind reading, in fact it's automated and non-optional. I've developed a lot of "autistic" habits like avoiding eye contact just from trying to stay out of other people's heads.
When I was younger there was this one episode of the anime Boogiepop Phantom, this guy became able to see the regrets of others in the form of "bugs" inside of their body. He discovers he can somehow remove the bugs and is overcome with a desire to eat them - the person in question actually just entirely forgets whatever it is they regret. At the end Boogiepop shows up and points out to him that his own body is now filled with "bugs" and that he carries all of the regret he's consumed, she explains it's morally wrong to make people forget their own regrets and that he's a sort of thief. He goes insane and gets himself hit by a car.
I don't want to control people and I don't want to be the spider guy.
Rolling for ass-burgers
>>713392960
>If you are lacking empathy, then you have no ability to grasp or to change tactic when the girl you're talking to is obviously thinking you're an autistic freak.
Why would I want to be with someone that has a problem with that?
I just wanna be with someone who will watch anime and build/program computers with me. And preferably shares some of my perverted fetishes
Why would I change tactics to appear NOT like me? Then, I have to BECOME someone different, when I really just want someone who's very similar to me, so we can mutually enjoy activities with one another.
That's what I'm saying. Why would you want a non-mutually-beneficial relationship in the first place?
The point of a relationship is to have benefits going in both directions of equal value as denoted by each person's personal weighting of different benefits and costs...
>>713393264
more like yes, kind of yes, kind of no and no
>>713374785
47
Some questions are weird to answer though
>>713393364
whoever wrote this post is a fucking gawd
>>713393453
thx fag
>>713393444
yeah some of them were poorly worded
>>713393046
Oh I can completely agree that society is obsessed with emotion to a retarded level.
I can't stand the SJW bullshit.
But claiming that having a low empathy is somehow a good thing, is idiotic.
Empathy is the ability to intuitively understand others emotions. What one does with that information is something altogether different.
Personally I have quite a high empathy level, but that doesn't mean I'm an emotional human being at all. I'm verging on sociopathic. I genuinely don't give a shit about those feelings, but understanding them, being able to relate etc. are VERY useful skills in my life and have opened a million doors.
You can be an empathetic arsehole who uses that understanding to manipulate and fuck with others.
People here seem to be confusing empathy with being emotional. They are very seperate.
>>713374785
>22
shit, I didn't think I was this bad
11/80 what did I except tbh
F u c k
>>713374785
19. so if i dont care about people's feelings, im an autist?
>>713393583
Hmmm, ok, I see what you're saying, but I'm saying the FACT that so many people are so emotional is the problem, not that there are people who don't understand emotions well.
Not understanding properly what is basically a glitch in humanity is not the biggest issue; the glitch itself is.
The best thing to do would be to teach people to stop being so emotional.
>>713393935
not necessarily "not care about" but more "not recognize"
Your Empathy Quotient score was 17 out of a possible 80.
Scores of 30 or less indicate a lack of empathy common in people with Autism or Asperger’s Syndrome.
Whoops
>>713393388
I'll tell you why you should change for others.
Because you'll not date a fat girl, you prefer girls who wear makeup and dress well etc.
Being able to wear "make up" for your personality is the price we pay for being men.
If you are unwilling to hone your better attributes in order to be more attractive to women, then you have no right to prefer women who do the same with their physical appearance and should date fat, ugly women who neither wash nor wear makeup.
This is a blindness so many guys have, it's selfish and shortsighted.
Part of the process of dating is to show your best and play the game, the early stages of dating are about impressing. You earn being yourself once you've passed the initial stage and get to know each other.
It happens throughout nature.
I'm sure there are male birds of paradise who'd rather not do a stupid dance with their feathers.
Don't blame the messenger, I'd prefer things to be easier too. But then again, I also wouldn't want women to stop making an effort, so why should I?
got 15
I figured I would get this. I am emotionless and reserved towards most people.
If I ever show signs of care, consider yourself lucky.
I guess below 30 and you belong in 4chan
Wow got a 23
I guess im a retard
>>713394388
The eeedge
Yay
Got 13, been spergy all my life
>>713380444
check em'
you have to be a little human when you're a IT Consultant
>>713394187
>Because you'll not date a fat girl
Variable. I would prefer someone who isn't extremely overweight. I'm overweight, though, and trying to lose weight for numerous reasons, but I would say I wouldn't even question up to ~160 lbs. Probably wouldn't have a significant turnoff until at least ~200.
I'm currently 236, myself. I do want to get down to 180ish.
>you prefer girls who wear makeup
I prefer girls who do not wear makeup or have piercings (though, ears are fine, but >2 per ear is a turn-off)
>and dress well etc.
Like lab coats or things with embedded electronics? Or maybe some other niche-wear, like Cyber/Steam punk.
If that's what you mean, then yes.
Basically, cosplayers (who would use cosplaying as a regular outfit)
[obviously anime cosplay is also cute]
>who neither wash nor wear makeup.
Washing and hygiene is of utmost importance.
Makeup is of negative value under most circumstances
>Part of the process of dating is to show your best and play the game, the early stages of dating are about impressing. You earn being yourself once you've passed the initial stage and get to know each other.
I get what you're saying, but this is completely counter-intuitive... assuming you have at least built up enough trust to know they won't blab about your most outrageous secrets, you should basically go all-out to first see if you are both compatible. Otherwise, there is no reason to test.
Initial incompatibility is a reason to throw a killswitch immediately, before even seeing if additional compatibility vectors might not fit or need to be adjusted to make it work.
>But then again, I also wouldn't want women to stop making an effort, so why should I?
I don't understand a fascination with makeup unless it's being used for cosplay...
It looks bad...
>>713395054
I currently do low-scale IT consulting while in college. I'm one of the people who got an 11/80.
I wanna open my own companies, though. I mostly dislike people. I even hate when people contact me via phone...
>>713374785
Boring as fuck, was surprisingly easy to do. The test is also not calibrated properly, all strong positives gives 42, while all strong negatives gives you 38. Apperently to the if your more of a negative person your more autistic.
>>713395194
To be fair, I agree with the points you're making.
The make-up comments were there as an analogy, as it's the standard thing that women are expected to do to appear more attractive to men.
The point I was making is that "being yourself" when applied to either sex doesn't take into account that when we're looking for a partner that the initial phase is about showing the best of what you have.
Makeup (or suchlike) is a physical way of improving those traits that are important to the majority of men.
Women tend to prefer confidence, status etc. mostly psychological traits. So us men have to learn to wear some kind of psychological make-up in order to show ourselves at our best.
I for one used to be quite introverted, but I worked hard to develop the skills to show the best of who I am in a confident and self-assured manner.
I could have just sat on my arse and said "women should like me for who I am".
So perhaps we're arguing for the same point here.
Yes of course have standards and don't waste time with those that you're incompatible with. But that isn't an excuse not to refined what you do have to show yourself at your best.
And that's why I was refering to when it came to empathy, often you may need to showcase your best in different ways depending on the mood of the girl you're talking to.
You may both like video games, but perhaps she likes them for slightly different reasons. If you can pick up on what they are by her reactions, you can work with that.
Otherwise I basically agree with you.
>>713395564
*you're
Your Empathy Quotient score was 28 out of a possible 80.
Scores of 30 or less indicate a lack of empathy common in people with Autism or Asperger’s Syndrome.
Ayy lmao. I'm more of a sociopath type than autist though.
>>713394388
Skill, how long did that take?
Well I thought it would be a little higher...
>>713395370
I hate people and I'm the sole IT person for the entire 80+ people company + another 10+ company that is rapidly growing.
I have help from the it guy from another sister company, but still.
And I'm making it. You'll be fine.
>>713394098
I answered that I recognize other people's feelings etc. and I'm not socially retarded but I just don't care about other people's problems at all. Not even my best friend's.
Only people that I truly care about are my family.
t. >>713396231
I got 27 - 30. What the fuck?
>>713395370
I dont really care about people in person, but I act like I care, because they are not the point, the point is to get what you want.
If you can get what you want, by just smiling in their faces and telling them what they want to hear(truth or lie) , then yes, I will have "empathy" everyday of the week
Everyone here claiming they hate people - you do realise the internet, 4chan etc. are all the results of people.
Why would you come and post anything here if the thoughts of others wern't of some importance to you. Even if it's just the pleasure of winding someone up.
>>713395814
>Makeup (or suchlike)
Ok, now it makes sense. I didn't realize you were using makeup non-literally.
>You may both like video games, but perhaps she likes them for slightly different reasons. If you can pick up on what they are by her reactions, you can work with that.
I suppose that makes sense, as long as playing them together is the end result.
I mean, I guess I see what you're saying. It's more like you don't try to sell a car by starting with all the bad things, you first list all the good things that might be interesting BEFORE moving on to all the weird or bad things about it.
Oh hey, this car is fully electric, 0-60 in 4 seconds, and can seat up to 5. Quite as a mouse, too.
>BUTTTTTT: it only gets 100 miles/charge and takes 8 hours to charge up.
>>713396479
oh wow, nice.
and ok, that's good to know. thanks
>>713396837
This. It's kinda awkward when you have to act like you care. Are we psychopaths or something?
Potential sperglord here. Though I'm more convinced that the test is absolute bollocks.
>>713396857
Information Transfer.
You don't have to like the people you talk to, nor do you have to agree with them, but information in its own right is worth seeing.
It's an expansion of total information you know, and therefore interesting and/or potentially useful.
>if the thoughts of others wern't of some importance to you
Thoughts are important. They are information from a different perspective you might not have, and therefore different.
Whether or not you like what they say is a different story.
And hating people does not have anything to do with hating information. Moreover, most of us are talking about how we think emotions are overdone
Also, checked your bait.
>27 - 30
I was diagnosed with autism when I was 5 or 7. I'm 19 now.
>random questions about social stuff
>nothing weird
>When I was a child, I enjoyed cutting up worms to see what would happen.
dafuq?
>>713397312
Information about what exactly?
Because the vast amount of information on this site is about the human world and human experiences.
>>713393413
kind of kek
>>713397091
Sociopath or psychopath whatever you wanna call it, as long as you dont hurt anyone, I see no evil, you only steer things in your favor.
>>713374785
Studying for pediatric psychiatry
>>713395564
Not necessarily true, some of the questions are negative, therefore the negative responses would then be positive.
29
67
I scored 38 but a lot of questions assumed I have recent conversations with friends, or having lots of friends so I guess I lost a few points there.
>>713374785
8/80 here and a diagnosed sperg.
>>713392472
this nigger said the truest shit in the entire fucking thread.
16
Wtf.....!
>>713374785
I don't trust this test.
seems about right
