93% of people can't solve this, can you?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
93% of people can't solve this, can you?
25
15
>>713088988
30 breh
60
25
>>713089103
agree
>>713088988
15 duh
It could be fucking anything
70
25 is the ONLY right answer
>>713088988
Diabetes
70
>>713089177
But I'll say 5
>>713088988
A single box of chips is a new variable. We cannot assume it's half of the two-boxes. Maybe the 2 are sold at a discount?
I can not, will not, stand this 1st grade foolishness.
70 I'm in calculus faggots
25 you stupidass niggers
70
10 + 10 + 10 = 30
10 + 5 + 5 = 20
5 + 2 + 2 = 9
5 + (1 x 10) = 15
>>713088988
10+10+10=30
10+5+5=20
5+2+2=9
5+1*10=15
>>713088988
We need to know what each one is worth you stupid negro
>>713089208
It's got to be this
>>713088988
15, but only if you consider One medium fry package image to have half the value of the 2 package one.
42
>>713088988
What is the order of operations?
Without telling us that it's a trick question.
Soda=10
Hamburger=5
Fries=2
Therefore
2×10=20
Plus 5
25
>>713089216
But diet coke
>>713088988
It's 25
>>713089236
>calculus
>not superior mathematics degree
Single choice faggot.
>>713089231
Those are fries not chips u nigger
>>713089236
For someone who is "in calculus" (whatever that's supposed to mean) you're not very good at counting how many boxes of fries there are, are you?
70
>>713088988
$4.99 plus tax
10 + 10 + 10 = 30
Drink = 10
10 + 5 + 5 = 20
Burger = 5
5 + 2 + 2 = 9
Fries = 9
Burger + Fries x Drink = ?
5 + 2 x 10 = 25
>>713089267
Ok Im stupid nigger as well looks like
>>713089364
Look closely at the bottom line, there is only one box of fries.
Answer is 15
>>713089394
-50 + 5
>>713089404
EXCUSE ME BUT THAT'S NOT THE PRICE
>>713089208
Anyone else is wrong
Minimum wage?
60
>>713089436
Fuck me
>>713089410
disregard me. the other posts about one box of fries are correct.
answer is 15
>>713088988
Fat
>>713089410
5+1×10 = 15
You are wrong
>>713089141
>>713089237
The correct answer.
>>713089330
That's how it works at McDonald's so that's a safe assumption. 15 is correct.
>>713089216
Also technically correct.
10 + 10 + 10 = 30
10 + 5 + 5 = 20
5 + 2 + 2 = 9
5 + (2 x 10) = 25
25
>>713089545
10 + 10 + 10 = 30
10 + 5 + 5 = 20
5 + 2 + 2 = 9
5 + (1 x 10) = 15
> fixed
>>713088988
Not solvable,
single box of fries is a undefined variable.
You can't multiply fries and coke
>>713089456
This must be the same troll "programmer" from last night who said there were 17 squares.
>>713089456
Look at da fries man. The ones in the second last line have 2 per image, so a single thing of fries is actually valued 1
4657
>>713089456
The last one you need to multiply the fries and soda. Molecular value of liquids is higher than fried food though
>>713089617
Yes it is, 2 boxes = 2
1 box = 1
>>713089456
5+(2x10)=25
Its fucking simple
rollin'
>>713089532
Order of operations. You'll understand when you get to 5th grade.
>>713089617
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWToW9ZNOpo
>>713089545
yu done goof
Its 15, niggers. Go back to your ghettos
17
>>713088988
THe solution is : Fat white america
>>713089651
Looks like you are in the 93%...
The answer is 15
>>713088988
hamburger plus fries times shake equals seven shakes. Because food don't follow mathematical rules.
>>713088988
Go back to facebook you fuck
>>713089806
Kek
10+10+10=30
10+5+5=20
5+2+2=9
5+2x10=70
70
Nice try op
Bond burger
>>713088988
17, easy
combo meal price
roll
>>713089172
It's a X sign inbetween the fries and drink
Any answer other than 60 is wrong
>>713088988
I would say 15, because the bottom line is 5 + (1*10)
But 2 fries = 4, and 2 is probably cheaper than getting just one, so one half fries may be 1½, making the total 5 + (1½*10)
>>713089843
Someone never learned how to do maths correctly :( sorry anon
>>713089617
>/
this
Get on my level.
>>713088988
Everyone knows a Big Mac Meal costs $5.69
>>713089843
5 + (2*10) = 70. MATHS EVERYONE DDDDDDDDDSASSSSSSQQQQQQQQQQQ
>>713089543
Its a different image and a new variable, the only reason one would think that it holds half the value is because we have the preconseption that the picture shows two fries package, if the image was something that doesnt really exist, lets say two irregular form that looks like they could be the same but one is on top of the other, hiding a portion of it then one could only ASSUME that they both hold the same value as they "look" identical while only partially being able to see one of the two image completely
>>713089090
>>713089110
>>713089141
>>713089153
>>713089172
>>713089177
>>713089201
>>713089208
>>713089211
>>713089222
>>713089224
>>713089236
>>713089237
>>713089267
>>713089268
>>713089287
>>713089297
>>713089351
>>713089364
>>713089410
>>713089456
>>713089532
>>713089545
>>713089760
When I look at this thread I start to understand why /b/ likes Trump.
>>713090026
False.
10+10+10=30
10+5+5=20
5+2+2=9
5+2x10=25
The anwser is 25
Its (5+1) x 10 = 60
Fucking morons
>>713090064
There is one set of fried there. ONE. IT'S 15 GOD DAMN IT.
>>713090063
Threw a shot in the dark
25
Pay attention to the multiplication of the last line, almost missed it.
>>713089695
5+(2x10)
Where did you get the 2 from? Is ONE fries 2?
>>713088988
I so FUCKING tired of this everlasting bullshit things. Facebook is full with that shit, and now, it's spreading into 4chan...
Come on, retard, we know there's no such thing as a single answer to that question.
The priority order of the multiplication over the addition is out of the question (only idiots ignore that "x" is done before "+")
The thing is that there a two answers possible, depending on whether we consider the fries as a concept (thus, having one or two boxes is no relevant here) or the numbers of boxes being important (then, 1 box is equal to one, and two to two)
And it's ALWAYS the same with all the calculus shit all over facebook!
So, MY answer is: eat and drink all that, and die from diabeetus PLEASE
hamburguer
>>713090120
You can't just add parentheses willy nilly like that, dumbfuck.
I just changed the maths mother fuckers.
60
25
60
>This whole thread
>'Murica in a nutshell
You do not need a phd in topology to see that the answer is 15.
>>713090053
>implying bad math or low intelegence == liking trump
>implying hilary voters are superior
>implying any of this matters anymore
Papa fucked hillary
Diabetes
The answer is simple.
>>713088988
THERE AM ARE LESS FRIES IN THE 3RD ROW AND 4 SO THE ANSWER IS 45
>>713090036
>>713089617
>>713089231
The only real answear. UNSOLVABLE
>>713088988
The answer is a combo meal.
>>713089216
beat me to it
>>713088988
17
How are people getting these wild answers?
16 obviously.
gr8 b8 m8ts
5 +1 x 10 = 60
Try it on a calculator dolt
17000
>>713089456
you're right, it boggles the mind that so few people can solve this problem
>>713090477
correct
>>713090036
Don't be a pedantic asshole. If I show you two pictures of 10lb weights and ask how much they weigh combined you could point out that we don't know what planet they are being weighed on so they might not really weigh 10lbs . But that's just going to result in you getting the shit kicked out of you in the locker room again. All puzzles, riddles, and tests have built in assumptions based on the reality we all share. Unless otherwise stated, all average conditions should be assumed.
It is fair to caveat your answer. Is it is not correct to declare reasonable assumptions to be invalid.
>>713089273
Wouldnt it be 5+(2*10)=25?
>>713089843
you have to multyply first you faggot. so its 2 times ten,(20) plus 5
25
i take baits like a motherfucker
>>713090418
So in America, multiplying is the same as summing?
>>713089090
This.
Coke=10
Burger=5
Fries=2
5+2*10=5+20=25
>>713090504
you need to fucking think dammit see there is only 1 box of chips after they said that there was 2 WHY. the 1 box must be half of what the 2 boxes ever were
roll
>>713090053
oh yeah? and what's your answer?
>>713090636
you're 100% right
>>713089090
/thread
>>713090561
Youre taking me out of context, stay a little peasant
>>713088988
It's 17 dumb cunts
>>713088988
Oh wait 15
>>713088988
3 cups = 30: 1 cup = 10
1 cup + 2 burgers = 20: 1 burger = 5
1 burger + 4 fries = 9: 1 fry = 1
5 + 1 x 10 = 5 + 10 = 15
the answer is 15.
the answer is always 15...
>>713089848
>>713090839
Wait I just saw that the boxes of fries were in a set of two in the second row so I guess 16
>>713090955
+ <> x
>>713090955
Why is there a multiplication sign that's stupid it's 15 I change my mind
>>713088988
The typical american dinner
25
Ok... Now, I get it... We're being surrounded by retards even in here...
>>713090561
Thats not exatly the same situation, if you were to show the guy TWO pictures of 10lb weight then it would be fair, the sum of both would be 20lb. What hes saying is that if there were a single picture of two 10lb weight , one before the other, hiding a portion of the other weight then one could only ASSUME that the other weighr is also identical and weights 10lb
>>713091186
Typical american math.
5+1x10 = 15.
it's either 15 or 5 + 10X
it matters weather you think of one fry as 1/2(two fry) or as a different variable.
>>713091331
an yes i know i used the wrong whether
60 you fucking retarded fags
>>713091387
and yes i know i used an instead of and
Let this thread die already
>>713089103
correct
>>713091456
and yes I know I didn't capitalize my I's
>>713091529
I already know that I didn't punctuate my corrections.
>>713091281
Yes, at that would be an EXPECTED assumption, just like the expected assumption that they are being measured on earth, and that we're using base 10 math rather than binary, and the list of assumptions you are expected to make could go on ALL FUCKING DAY. See the point now?
If you want to take the time to caveat your answer that is fine. But it is not valid to say that you can't assume a picture of two weights is actually two weight. Baring any evidence that something is extraordinary, ordinary conditions should be assumed.
>>713091330
I just seen the one fry for the last row so yes 15
>>713088988
Easy 70
>>713090053
Because they can do basic math?
>>713090321
Did I strike a nerve? Trump lovers are even more retarded than Hillary lovers. You know it's true. Rationalize your support however you want.
15
>>713091729
>>713088988
120
Let this thread die already
The answer is unknown.
Changing the image to a single set of fries does not imply that the single set of fries = 1. It's a completely new image, meaning it's a completely new variable.
The image is retarded and only shows that people don't care enough about some shitty math problem on the Internet to bother checking the images carefully.
>>713091845
You're the retard here, nigger.
>>713088988
010000
>>713091729
no because these people fell for one of the most devious trick questions.
>>713091779
They're both retarded
>>713091905
I'm using sage not sure about you
ITT
>faggot posts very simple puzzle
>one of first replies answers correctly. In this case literally first reply of 25
>OP posts some wrong answers and calls everyone retarded to jimmy rustle
>Thread gains in popularity as butthurt retards are trolled by what they think is a bunch of retards
>pride overcomes common sense and the world goes round.
Fucking done with this site
>>713091928
Retard.
>>713088988
this is the shittiest way to write a math problem ever. it's like when yoda talks with the sentences all mismashed, just write it in the more logical way and you won't trick "93% of people into being idiots.
also the answer is a value meal
>>713091980
oops, just noticed the multiplication sign
it's actually 111100
7
>>713092148
How can you know what binary is yet not understand order of operations?
>>713092013
I'm using sage not sure about you
>No worry, I will from now on, thanks for the advice.
>>713090631
Nope, fries = 1
the third equation has four sets of fries.
>>713092033
Dubs of truth
Let this thread die please. Pics u shouldnt share and "im gonna an hero because ___whine whine whine____" retardation threads are better than this.
>>713088988
25, people who say 15 are worst kind of retards.
>>713092325
Except his answer is wrong, thus proving why basic math and comprehension threads are necessary. The answer is 5+1x10 = 15.
>>713092393
Its 15
>>713092309
oh shit you're right!
Didn't see that lmfao
It's 15, if you say otherwise prove me wrong.
>>713092549
well buddy I think the burden of proof falls on you; seeing as this question is made in a way to trick people into believing it's 25.
>>713092666
nice satanic trips don't get those much
>>713092048
No u
>>713092264
PEMDAS?
BODMAS?
The multiplication isn't in brackets so the equation is left-to-right, not multiplication-then-addition
>>713092033
>>713092325
>>713092393
In the spirit of this thread, we can logically deduce something about these anons. We know this because either they're incapable of doing basic math, incapable of basic comprehension such as that one fry box has half the value of two fry boxes, or they're trolls. All three possible cases arrive at the same solution: they're faggots.
>>713092858
good job bumping this to the top of the board, for a moronic shitpost.
>>713088988
10+10+10 = 30
10+5+5 = 20
5+2+2 = 9
5+2*10 = 25
>>713092894
Sometimes I wonder if trolls like you are really just retards who are so ashamed that you were wrong that you lie to yourself and pretend you knew the right answer but you just said that retarded shit because you were trolling. Then you continue to troll to reassure yourself that you were just trolling.
>>713093192
the argument in this current point is that there is only one fry container on the bottom equation whereas there are four in the equation above it(because they are in pairs above and it is singular below),
>>713093192
>5+2*10 = 25
First mistake: a single fry is 1, not 2
>5+1*10
Second mistake: simple equations (no parentheses or exponents) are solved left-to-right.
5
+1 = 6
*10 = 60
>>713093548
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.
>>713093548
Oh dang!
Did not look closely enough.
Ok, I'm officially in the 93% :(
>>713092946
Good job bumping this to the top of the board for a moronic shitpost
>>713093671
No parenthesis necessary. Multiplication comes first. Left to right is wrong. http://www.mathgoodies.com/Lessons/vol7/order_operations.html
>>713093671
Website gives 15
Calculator gives 15
U sure bro?
fitteen
>>713093671
Welcome to the 93% :(
>>713089216
This
>>713093820
that's bullshit.
pick up a calculator and enter
5+1*10
10 + 10 + 10 = 30
10 + 5 + 5 = 20
5 + 2(1) + 2(1) = 9
5 + 1 + 10 = 16
Anything else and you are retard confirmed
>>713093726
yea op is a real fucking faggot for posting this trick question
>>713089410
Only one pack of fries
>>713094072
look at the bottom line again, einstein.
5+1x10 = 15
>>713093671
Why is it that the least educated are always the most confident?
(P)arenthesis
(E)xponents
(M)ultiplication
(D)ivision
(A)ddition
(S)ubtraction
Multiplication before addition.
>>713090561
The weight(mass) of the object is constant, no matter where you measure it
However the downwards force of the object is not the same
F =mg (g varies)
>>713089361
Pemdas
There are 4 fries
>>713094039
http://www.mathgoodies.com/Lessons/vol7/order_operations.html
>>713088988
It's a number 1 combo
>>713088988
1 cola = 10
1 burger = 5
fries = 1
16
15
>>713088988
5+(1*10)=15
>>713089984
Pretty simple integral bro
BUT what does doublefries mean ? is that 2 x fries or fries ^ 2 ? singlefries might be square root of doublefries
>>713088988
5+(1*10)=15 first multip, and after add
>>713094259
Weight and mass are not the same thing. Educate yourself. http://www.livescience.com/33356-weight-on-planets-mars-moon.html
25, duh...
3a = 30
a = 10
a + 2b = 20
2b = 10
b = 5
b + 2c = 9
2c = 4
c = 2
a + b x c = n
n = 5 + (10)(2)
n = 5 + 20
n = 25
25
>>713089984
5
- π
2
>>713088988
Let d represent a drink, b a burger and f a pack of fries.
3d=30
d=10
d +2b=20
(10)+2b=20
b=5
5+2(2f)=9
4=4f
f=1
b + (fd)=x
5 + 10 =x
therefore the third line equals 15
Pie.
>>713089103
Correct. I almost got tricked from the 2 fries. On the bottom problem there is only one thing of fries. Therefore 10+(1*5)=5+10=15 tricky tricky.
>>713094798
Fourth line.
e = mc2
>>713094660
Hey dumbass it's 0.5b
>>713090574
No 5+(1×10)=15
93% of the people dont get that its a trick question.
25 faggot
100 you fucking retatds
>>713088988
17.
>>713088988
You can't multiply sodas with fries
Only right answer
15
>>713088988
>93% of people can't solve this.
Maybe 93% of people t daycare, or on /b/ ..
it is obviously $7.85 plus tax. But variables can change depending on country, as each country's McDonalds charges a different price per Big Mac Meal.
http://www.fastfoodmenuprices.com/mcdonalds-prices/
>>713088988
17
Also check em
>>713089177
25 you fucking jews
>>713089707
greater than the sum of their parts
>>713089103
Yep
>>713088988
Obesity
ITS FUCKING 70
>>713088988
Burger = 5
French Fries = 2
Drink = 10
5+2×10 = 25
Easy as fuck
>>713089216
LUL
>>713089273
LOL Einstein
>>713089364
Watch out guys, we have Einstein here!
>>713090746
kek
>>713089141
This. Good night.
It's 16
This was here yesterday faggot
The answer is still 25
70
17 you Fucking retards -_-
>>713088988
'+' and '×' operators were not defined
>>713088988
PEMDAS, answer is 15.
>>713089231
/thread
>>713088988
Drink = 10
Drink + 2 burger = 20
2 burger = 10
Burger = 5
Burger + 2(fry) + 2(fry) = 9
4 fry = 4
Fry = 1
5 + 1 x 10 = 5 + 10 = 15 (BEDMAS niggers)
>>713098432>>713098254>>713098140>>713097678>>713097673>>713097414
>>713097336>>713096675>>713096578>>713096335>>713096138>>713094660
>>713094343>>713094072>>713093192>>713092613>>713092393>>713092148
>>713091889>>713091186>>713090955>>713090857>>713090839>>713090776
>>713090631>>713090594>>713090574>>713090482>>713090477>>713090527
>>713090449>>713090288>>713090280>>713090276>>713090120>>713090064
>>713090013>>713089843>>713089848>>713089760>>713089695>>713089649
>>713089545>>713089482>>713089456>>713089410>>713089268>>713089267>>713089237
>>713089222>>713089211>>713089208>>713089201>>713089172>>713089153
>>713089141>>713089110>>713089090>>713089236>>713090026>>713091674>>713091980>>713093671>>713097052>>713096958>>713098156
Go back to occupy Bernie fags, you are the 93%
>>713088988
>>>713088988
>30 breh
Jup
>>713088988
15 cuz millennials don't get order of operations, and the chins is full of millennials.
It's unsolvable ffs <.< when there's a new value, you can't just assume what the new value is based on a picture that has no facts of the new value. even though it LOOKS like it's half the value of the fries, how do we know for sure? there are literally no facts about this new value so in this case, the pictures is tricking you.
>>713089141
correct!
>>713088988
10
you guys are autistic.
>>713089834
This
>>713102237
5 + 1 * 10 = 15 you autist.
>>713088988
fiddy
>>713088988
10+10+10=30
10+5+5=20
5+(1+1)+(1+1)=9
5+(1*10)= 15
Acting like a moron ironically makes you a moron. Acting like a moron unironically makes you a moron.
Unadulterated proof of how many minors browse /b/
>>713088988
I want to know why a soda is so fucking expensive..
Isn't a double quarter pounder meal like 5.99?
>>713088988
15 /thread
>>713102609
What about acting like a moron postironically?
30 / 3 = 10
(20 - 10) / 2 = 5
(9 - 5) / 4 = 1
5 + 1 + 10 = 16
70
>>713103109
oh fuck me thought the multiplication was an addition. Its 15 actually and Im an idiot
>>713103109
5 + 1 + 10 = 16 ???
5 + 1 x 10 = 15
>>713088988
The answer is diabeetus.
>>713089231
>hurr durr II can't be double I because they're variables, not numerals durr
Lrn2 Roman Numerals
>>713090053
>0053â–¶>>713090321 >>713090670 >>713091729
>>>713089090
same
Well if we assume that in the last equation, the fries' value is 1, then the answer is 15. Technically it's impossible to solve unless we make assumptions.
Wow you people are fucking retarded
>>713103683
>unless we make assumptions
Please. You're assuming they're variables instead of numerals by saying it can't be solved. Try again.
16
93% people solv this in 12s
>>713103783
aaaand here's the 93%
The answer is 15.
Either you're all trolling or this is why all you dumb fucks just voted for Trump. This is like a question you'd see in a Grade 5 classroom, but maybe in America this is university-level.
>>713103783
They are variables.
>>713103683
It's an IQ test. If you're not able to draw that most basic assumption then we have a new job at Walmart for you at the front door.
>>713089984
5*pi/2
>>713088988
The answer is 17
>>713088988
Let's call a picture of a coke A, a picture of a burger B, a picture of two cups of fries C, a picture of one cup of fries D, and the answer E.
3A = 30, A = 10
10 + 2B = 20, B = 5
5 + 2C = 9, C = 2
5 + D*10 = E
E = 5 + D*10
Now, SOME would argue that because the symbol for C is just the symbol for D overlaid onto itself, we can say C = 2D. This would allow us to further reduce the equation set to E = 5 + 10C/2 = 15.
HOWEVER, there is NO ALGEBRAIC AXIOM that allows us to make the assumption that C = 2D. Nothing in any common mathematical system declares that putting a picture with a known value on top of itself doubles that value. That's an assumption we have to make, and if you're comfortable making that assumption, your understanding of symbolic logic falls short of what could reasonably be expected from a college student.
Picture related.
>>713104124
>>713104255
X+X+X=30
X+V+V=20
V+II+II=9
V+I*X=?
Math sure is hard when you try to make it bigger than it has to be.
Cock Gob!
15
/b/ is filled with handicaps.
In math you are required to always use the most commonly accepted conventions. Then you make all your assumptions based on this. If their are any nuances that should be known the "asker" is the one that must make these clear.
For example:
If I ask what is 1+1?
You should answer = 2
If I was being cheeky and wanted base 2 addition it is upon me the asker to make that clear. I should have asked "What is 1+1 in base 2." Then the correct answer is 1+1 = 10
The same is true in this case. The assumption that 2 fries = 2*1 fries is correct. Therefore the answer is 15.
Also if you do not know your order of operations you are likely mentally retarded.
>>713104441
Goblin Cock!
ITS 15
DOUBLE STACKED FRIES = 2
ON LAST PIC THERE ONLY 1 FRIES =1
10x1 = 10+5 = 15
any other answer is wrong
>>713103683
EVERY test requires assumptions. If I ask you the answer to 2+2 would you say it's impossible to tell because you don't know whether I mean base 10 or base 3? Unless otherwise stated, all normal conditions and assumptions should be assumed.
>>713104384
>Nothing in any common mathematical system declares that putting a picture with a known value on top of itself doubles that value.
>tfw this nigga doesn't know how to count in Roman Numerals
Lemme help you out:
I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X...
>>713104573
>The assumption that 2 fries = 2*1 fries is correct.
>the most commonly accepted conventions.
That is not a commonly accepted convention.
>>713104626
That's irrelevant because these aren't roman numerals
>>713089984
Diabetes
>>713104384
You're a moron.
There are 3 unknowns.
A = Coke
B = Burger
C = Fries
Since when is have 2 of a given quantity a new variable. Moreover, how the fucking is having 2 of something, that thing squared. If you have an apple and then I tell you "here's another apple." Do you all of a sudden have a hyperdimensional apple (apple^2)? Fucking idiot. No, you have 2 apples.
Therefore,
3A = 30 => A = 10
10 + B + B = 20 => B = 5
5 + 2C + 2C = 9 => C = 1
5 + 1 * 10 = 15
Stop being a fucking mongoloid please. Go back to school.
>>713104695
Bullshit. You said that
>Nothing in any common mathematical system declares that putting a picture with a known value on top of itself doubles that value.
I referenced a mathematical system with that as the basis of the numbering system. Try again.
>>713088988
the answer is clearly obesity
>>713104659
Are you mentally retarded.
If you have 1 apple, then I give you another apple such that you have 2 apples next to each other. You have 2 apples. Fucking idiot.
Then if I ask you what is 1 apple, it's half of 2 apples.
1 apple = (1/2) * 2 apples.
>>713104879
>Since when is have 2 of a given quantity a new variable.
You don't have two of something. You have a PICTURE of two of something. That PICTURE of two of something is given a value. You are then presented with a PICTURE of ONE of the thing.
I'd agree if we were doing math with actual objects. These are pictures. Pictures can have any meaning the author chooses to ascribe to them. How do we know the author of this math problem didn't secretly decide the meaning of these pictures and not tell us.
>>713104420
Yeah, only, you know, it doesn't actually say X+X+X=30 etc. does it?
>>713100439
The autism is strong in this one
