Prove you're not a retarded American by completing this test in 10 seconds or less.
>This image confuses Americans
60
>>713001436
25. american.
60
almost put 11. didn't see that multiply.
>>713001530
You didn't need to clarify. With that answer, we know you're American.
3x=30
x=10;
10+2y=20
y=5;
5+4z=9
z=1;
5+1+10=16.
70
15 Brah <3
>>713001627
...The fuck? Maximum autism confirmed.
>>713001510
>first was probably a britfag
>>713001636
Spotted another American.
>>713001436
25 nigger
>>713001627
Yes
eleventeen
>>713001436
15
/thread
>>713001627
5+1*10 = 15
70
Americorn. not puzzled
90
If you say 60 you legit have autism
It's 70 you meatballs
>>713001636
Thank you.
15 if we are taking X+(Y*Z), if (X+Y)*Z it would be 60
15
Murcan
>>713001436
100. simple
>>713001436
Umm.... that's a combo meal... you get those for 5.99...
>>713001742
>>713001750
>>713001636
It must be tough being an Amerilard.
90
>>713001539
10 + 10 + 10 = 30
10 + 5 + 5 = 20
5 + 2 + 2 = 9
Soda: 10
Hamburger: 5
Fries: 2
5 + 2 x 10 = ?
5 + (2 x 10) = ?
5 + 20 = 25
Fucking foreigners.
25
You fucking dipshits
17
>>713001684
Spotted another jackass
>>713001436
25. from TN
>>713001436
25 obviously.
>>713001831
>>713001863
>Calls people dipshits
>Failed 1st grade math
>mfw i realise there's 2 pots of fries on the 2nd row, but not on the third
>>713001436
It's 17 you freaking bananas.
60??
It's 15 and you're all fucking retarded
it's 25 you fucking retards
order of operations
>>713001436
25 nigger use PEMDAS
>>713001954
Correct
youre all retarded google BEDMAS
pop = 10
burger = 5
fries = 2
bedMAS.... MAS multiplcation then adition then subtraction
2 x 10 = 20
5 + 20 = 25
answer is 25
>>713001436
The answer is DRINK, in base (DRINK +BURGER).
Or 15 if you're a retarded usa'er.
>>713001436
25.
>>713001436
15 bitches Cup(10)x single fries(1) = 10
10 + (5) burger=15
No wonder you fucking Americans fail at everything. You would think with you're record high fat food would be easy to understand....
>>713001799
The drink is 10, the burger is 5, and the fries are 2...
16 california
>>713001939
It's fucking 14...
>>713001922
nice bait
I don't think most of you realize the last fries is half that of the previous fries.
15 you dumb niggers. There is only 1 fries which makes it 5+1x10
yeah sorry didnt see the *
>>713001773
pemdas, nigga
>>713001986
4 fries retard
>>713001799
Idk wut mean. Pemdas dood. 10×2=20 20+5=25. I was thanking a fellow American for not realising wtf that shit is.
>>713002066
dubs confirms not retarded
>>713001436
Feeling clever, huh? Try this one, faggots
70
>>713001986
only one packet of fries in that last equation you dumb fuck
>>713001436
I'm an American. How can I eat the image?
>>713001820
pay closer attention
first row you have correct
second row you have correct
third row...there is only one side of french fries and note the x sign rather than a + sign.
answer is 15 :)
>>713001573
Correct
>>713002102
4 fries idiot
>>713002140
69.1337
>>713001922
Anyone who says anything other than 15 is actually a fucking moron.
Okay retards.
You multiple 1 x 10 and get 10
Then, you add 5 to 10
Now, what do you have?
>>713001436
17
French Masterrace
>>713001436
If you do BIDMAS then
2X10=20
20+5=25
If you don't BIDMAS then
5+2=7
7X10=70
>>713002222
holy fuck
>>713001436
70, UK, 13
3 drinks = 30,
30/3 = 10
Drinks = 10
10 + (something + something) = 20
20-10=10
10/2=5
Burger = 5
5 + (something + something) = 9
9-5=4
4/2 = 2
Fries = 2
5 (burger) + 2 (fries) = 7
7x10=70
it's 70 you fuckwits. I'm 13 and even I could do that lmfao
>>713001986
each batch of fries=1
learn to count before you do the math
>>713002217
K doodlio
15 kek
american
>>713001436
Drink=10
Burger=2
Fries=5
Therefore the answer is 70, took me no effort at all
>American here, Texas specifically.
>>713001436
the last line 5 + x * 10 = y
the penultimate line 5 + 2z = 9, thus z = 2
now look carefully at x and z because they're different. this riddle cannot be answered
impossible
>>713001573
This is correct. I didn't see the multiply either.
>>713002182
youre right im a failiure ima suicide irl now cya
drinks= 10
burgers= 5
fries =2
10+10+10=30
10+5+5=20
5+2+2= 9
therefore:
5+2x10= ?
5+(2x10)=?
5+(20)=?
25=?
its fucking 25 dumbasses, every heard of PEMDAS?
>>713001436
a number 9 large
>>713002350
it's 15. houstonfag here. where are you?
>>713001667
That's basic algebra, my dude.
>>713002402
Spring, get out of my damn state retard.
>>713002365
live stream it?
3x=30
x=10
x+2y=20
10+2y=20
2y=10
y=5
y+2z=9
5+2z=9
2z=4
z=2
y+z(x)=n
5+2(10)=n
5+20=n
n=25
>>713002442
you're the retard who couldn't come up with 15 :)
You missed the multiplication
You fucking autists...
Drink is 10
Burger is 5
Double fries is 2
Burger + ONE FRIES x Drink
5 + (1 x 10)
Not hard...
>>713001436
13
5 + 1 x 10 = 15, but since it is a combo, you save a couple of dollars.
>>713002371
Look at the last equation you fucking moron. Only one pack of fries vs, the two packs from the third equation. Meaning the answer is 15............
>>713002140
>>713002222
A good question and an answer with quads, made my day
everyone in this thread is retarded...
its not 11
its not 16
its not 60
its 15 you morons
>>713001436
Dont confuse it with 70, Its 25. On the last section the fatfries is multiplied with diebeetus then the burger is added. Its 25
how many triangles?
>>713002222
Quads of truth
>>713002222
>mfw nobody notices my quads
>>713002371
Here's a tip, there's only 1 box of fries in the last one.
>>713001970
be careful who you are calling retarded, since you too didnt get the correct answer.
>>713002274
Fuck samefag didn't notice the SINGLE box of fries
It's 30
>>713002587
Oh shit that's single fries you're right
>>713002621
Is that tiny one on the right supposed to be one 8)
>>713002613
no its not
>>713001863
Nashvegas Holla!
>>713002660
Kekkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Didnt notice that. My fault for not zooming in. Its 15 on new calculations
>>713002708
15 Is the definite correct answer
>>713002660
fuck my dick
>>713002603
This is correct. We need to pay closer attention, a lot of us missed the multiplication and the single fries NOT double.
>>713001436
go back to facebook, OP
>>713001436
Why should you assume that double fries are double the value of single fries?
Without even trying to decipher that cypher I am just going to say 100
>>713001627
are you a fucking retard
>>713002621
I just only did it once through, I know i missed a couple, but i counted 51 so far.
>>713002505
REVISION
y+0.5z(x)=n
5+1(10)=n
5+10=n
n=15
>>713001436
15, American
15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
>>713002887
I'd fuck it if I rolled that way, but I don't.
>>713002660
WIZARD. We're so fucking blind here.
60, American
>>713003051
i am*
Using BEDMAS such that (B) (E) (DM) (AS) collected pairs resolve in order of appearance left-to-right within the formula and not preferentially to one another.
x = 10
y = 5
2z= 2
z = 1
? = 15
Proofs:
x + x + x = 30
3x = 30
x = 30/3
x = 10
x + y + y = 20
10 + 2y = 20
2y = 20 - 10
2y = 10
y = 10/2
y = 5
y + 2z + 2z = 9
5 + 4z = 9
4z = 9 - 5
4z = 4
z = 4/4
z = 1
x + y * z = ?
10 + 5 * 1 = ?
? = 15
The multiplication sign in the final formula was a cute touch.
>>713002660
The fact that people didnt notice this right away is amazing
Americans think answer is zero. . ...
....
... . .
Because they have already eaten everytthing!!
Like AND SHare!! God Bless
Its 15. There are 2 boxes of fries for each in the middle equasion and only one box of fries in the final equasion.
>>713001436
90. Beat that faggots.
>>713003176
>equasion
15
70 you retards
>>713003251
cation
anion
eqasion
>>713001436
17
>>713002222
>Graphing calculator detected.
>>713001627
Re-read the equation its 5 + (1 x 10) which is 15.
>>713003332
so close to quads bro
7235473
>>713003114
Nigga that took longer than 10 seconds to read, You went full autism.
>>713003345
whoops, thought they were all plus signs -
drink is worth 10
burger is worth 5
fries are worth 2
10+10+10=30
10+5+5=20
5+2+2=9
so since multiplication comes first,
5+(2x10)=
5+20=
25
21
>>713003351
That was not a right answer
is 90 you fuckwits
>>713001627
This
except it is
5+(1x10) = 15
>>713001436
Then answer is 19.142135623731
Shake = 10
Burger = 5
Fries squared = 2, so single fries = 1.4142135623730950488016887242097
5 + 1.4142135623730950488016887242097 x 10 = 19.142135623731
>>713003906
how the fuck?
>>713003629
correct answer
>>713004003
he did what I did at first. didn't notice it was a multiplication symbol. thinking they were all addition at first glance. so 5+2+10=17
>>713001436
>drink is more expensive than fries or burger
unrealistic.
>>713001436
that can't be solved. because you can add material things, but you can't just multiply fries with a drink.
sheeeeeit, I'd order of the dollar menu
burger 1
fries 1
drink 1
1+1x1=2
>>713004122
but wheres the 2? theres only 1 box of fries
>>713001627
are you actually retarded? there is no 5+4z=9
3x=30, 30/3=10, x=10
1x(10)+2y=20, 20-10=10, 10/2=5, y=5
1y(5)+2z=9, 9-5=4, 4/2=2, z=2
PEMDAS
y+z*x OR y+(z*x), 5+(2*10), 5+(20)=25
>>713004250
the images represent the item's cost...
>>713004008
Wrong.
Fries in 9 total line are in pairs with no arithmetic operator specified, so multiplication is assumed.
The fries in the final problem are a single.
>>713002899
Best answer, dubs
>>713001436
Why would you multiply fries by drink though?
Is there some kind of weird fries to drink ratio needed?
but yea 15 with this autismo equation.
>>713002182
No you fucking faggot, you use the order of operations to do the multiplication first, then the addition.
It's 25.
http://97265.ulinks.net
hot teens!! hot ass!!
hot teens pictures and videos
http://97265.ulinks.net
hot teens!! hot ass!!
hot teens pictures and videos
>>713004298
oh shit I didn't notice that either.
it's as if op is intentionally trying to deceive us.
>>713004477
despite your triple doubles, you're wrong
>>713001436
Diabetes.
the drink is ten
the burger is 5
the fries is one each
the answer is 60
>>713004357
fries are buy one get one free today. the number of them represented is therefore irrelevant. if you want to start making leaps.
>>713004147
They're just symbols used to represent values, oh wait, retarded Amerilard detected.
Answer's 70.
25. order of operations you stupid fucks.
Simple
Shake = 10
Burger = 5
Double fries = 2 and what's half of 2 you fuckwits? It's 1
>>713004722
retard
burger = 5
burger + 2*fries = 9
2*fries = 4
fries = 2
70
>>713001820
uh oh, retard alert
Shake is 10
Burger is 5
Individual fry is 1
16. America represent
>>713005048
60, not 16
Didn't see the multiply
Fries = a
Burgers = b
Shakes = c
c+ c +c = 30, therefore c = 10
10 + b + b = 20, therefore b = 5
5 + aa + aa = 9, therefore aa = 2
5 + a x 10 = ?
if aa (a x a) = 2 then a = 1.414214
1.414214 x 10 = 14.14214
14.14214 + 5 = 19.14214
The final answer is 19.14214
60
Does this settle the matter?
>>713004406
But it's still 15 anon
the level of retardation in this thread, it burns
Answer is 15 btw. Wisconsin
>>713001773
(X + Y)*Z is still 15
>>713002371
You're actually retarded. Kill yourself.
17 from Wisconsin, US
>>713001436
You're all retarded. The answer is: You're still a fatass
>>713005564
I take that back. Its 25. Didn't see the multiplication at the botton
>>713005800
you also didn't notice there is one container of chips...not two.
>>713005800
It's 15 though, american.
>>713004535
Or you're a fucking mongoloid who can't pay attention to detail...
>>713005922
>one container of chips
>container of chips
>container
>chips
my GLONASS just detected a britfag over here
>>713005166
this!
there are 2 fries in the 3rd line and only 1 in the forth. they also lack an expressed operator so the product is assumed.
a = 2
b = 3
c = ab
c would be 6.
>>713001436
here is the final, definitive answer, op.
pic related.
>>713001530
>Being this American
The answer is 10*(single fries) + 5
Just a single container of fries is not defined to be worth anything so the answer can be any complex number. (Doesn't even have to be a real number if a single container could represent an imaginary number)
>>713005166
But the fries are clearly 2a, not a^2, so you're wrong
>>713006182
call me Issac Newton cause I just dropped an apple of math on top of all your heads.
17?
>>713006518
How's middle school?
>>713002140
integral_0^∞ (10 sin(x))/(2 x) dx = (5 π)/2≈ 7.85398
wolfram alpha
>>713006511
no operator means product is assumed.
aa = a x a = a^2
the sum is an improper assumption since there is a lack of an arithmetic operator (plus sign)
>>713006511
>>713006733
nothing is assumed in math.
the image of two fry containers have a value of 2 on its own. it is not a formula. it is just a constant defined as 2, so logically, one half of that (one fry container) is equal to one.
people are fuckin' retarded.
10 + 10 + 10 = 30
10 + 5 + 5 = 20
5 + 2 + 2 = 9
5 + 2 + 10 = 17
you're welcome idiots.
coke + coke + coke = 30
3coke = 30
coke = 10
coke + burger + burger = 20
coke + 2burger = 20
10 + 2burger = 20
2burger = 10
burger = 5
burger + fries + fries = 9
burger + 2fries = 9
5 + 2fries = 9
2fries = 4
fries = 2
burger + fries * coke = ?
5 + 2 * 10 = ?
5 + (2 * 10) = ? [justification: in the order of operations, multiplication and division come before addition and subtraction]
5 + 25 = ?
? = 25
done
Can anyone point out the specific flaw in this reasoning? Given >>713001530 >>713001576 , it seems I'm wrong. I don't understand why.
>>713006733
2 packs of fries = 2xFries = 2Fries or 2a
>>713006926
you missed the multiplication sign
>>713006926
didn't catch the multiply symbol at the end!
5 + (2 x 10) = 25
>>713001436
two number 9s, a number 9 large, a number 6 with extra dip, a number 7, two number 45s, one with cheese, and a large soda
>>713006969
>6969
must be true
>>713002295
Multiply before adding because of BEMDAS
Also look at last line, only one fry box so if 2 fries = 2 then obv 1 fry = 1.
Redo the question now and you get 15
>>713006938
>5 + 2fries = 9
>2fries = 4
>fries = 2
you messed up here. the image of '2fries' is equal to 2, not 4.
5 + 2fries + 2fries = 9
2fries = 2
1fry = 1
>>713001436
15, now fuck off.
>>713007065
you also missed the fries being different. the 4th line uses a single fry not a double like the others.
2 + 4-5 + 34 = 69
prove me wrong!!!!!!!!!!111111111111111 im smarto, neato
>>713001436
About 1200 calories
>>713001556
Anybody with IQ above 100 can fugure this answer out.
I feel shame to others
>>713006926
Hey, retard, it 5 + 2*10.
25
you're welcome idiot.
60
>>713003592
I hope you're joking dude... All he wrote down was basically the simplest form of math. Is this the average intelligence?
>>713006917
Nope. When no operator is present, multiplication is used. Basic math there anon.
>>713007341
no, retard
5+1x10
15
pic related is the 100% correct solution.
>>713007065
you're still wrong in the third line there are 2 sets of 2 french fries meaning it would be 1 x 10 which is 10 + 5 is 15
If you didn't get 15 you should consider ending yourselves.
>>713006948
fries times fries = 2
>>713003629
Almost bro, just take another look at the last line though 'cause there is only one box of fries (meaning it's equal to one since two fries is equal to two) then re-do your last equation and you'll get 15
>>713007457
this is the correct answer
25 nice try, americunts strike again
>>713006938
it's a trick qeustion. The last image shows only 1 fry, not 2 fries. so It's 1x10
>>713001436
I'm an American and this is 17. Fries are 2, burger is 5 and shake is 10.
>>713007442
I corrected his mistake of the operation, not the fact he took the fry box twice.
>>713007441
it's not two things side by side. they overlap. it is one thing.
15 you stupid cunts, go back to eating amerifags
>>713007300
X 10
I'm seriously concerned for some of you.
>>713001436
this is a trick question.
what do the numbers represent? dollars? weight? no matter which you pick, multiplying them at the bottom doesn't make any sense because the outcome has no basis in reality.
the answer is null.
>>713007686
false. look closer at the fry images.
see:
>>713007457
>>713004406
pay attetion you dumb shit. The third row shows 2 fries equals 2, the 3rd row only shows 1 fry.
>>713007546
fries*fries = 1
because fries = 1
because 2 packs of fries implies 2*fries
19
>>713001436
x+x+x=30
x+y+y=20
y+2z+2z=9
y+z*x= ?
x=10
10+y+y= 10+2y=20 | -10 /2
y=5
y+2z+2z=9
5+4z=9 | -5 /4
z=1
y+z*x= 5 + 1*10 = 5+10 = 15
>>713007821
FUCKING MULTIPLICATION JEW REEEEEEE
It's 15.5 you dumbass niggers
>>713007759
what?
it's just math using numbers. it doesn't matter what they are numbers of.
the images of food are simply constants that have a set value
it's like this:
A + B + C
where A is 10, etc.
they are just symbols with a numerical value.
better to open ones mouth and remove all doubt, huh?
Thanksgiving dinner.
>>713001436
drink+drink+drink=30
3drink=30
/3 each side
drink=10
drink+burger+burger=20
10+burger+burger=20
-10 each side
burger+burger=10
2burger=10
/2 each side
burger=5
burger+fries+fries=9
5+fries+fries=9
-5 each side
fries+fries=4
2fries=4
/2 each side
fries=2
drink+burger x fries=?
x is sideways +
drink + burger + fries = diabeetus
? = diabeetus
>>713007192
Oh. Okay. You're right, two boxes of fries and one box of fries are two different variables. Let's try this again. For simplicity's sake, let's call coke "a", a burger "b", two boxes of fries "c", and one box of fries "d". (We can't guarantee that c = 2d. Although that's what the images appear to be trying to convey, there's no algebraic axiom that declares, "The value of a variable X whose symbol is twice that of another variable Y is equal to 2Y.")
3a = 30, a = 10
10 + 2b = 20, b = 5
5 + 2c = 9, c = 2
5 + 10d = ?
? = 5 + 10d
Solved as far as possible.
Now, IF we decided to declare c to be equal to 2d, then we get d = 1, ? = 5 + 10x1 = 15. But once again, we can't guarantee c = 2d, even though that's what it looks like. The fact that the symbol for c is just the symbol for d overlaid onto itself has no formal meaning in regard to the relationship between the variables.
>>713001436
= heartburn
>>713001436
57.5
A + A + A = 30
A + B + B = 20
B + C + C + C + C = 9
B + C x A = 15
>>713001436
potato
>>713008200
kek..no...
>>713008132
you are literally over-complicating it for no reason.
look:
>>713007457
17.5
>>713001436
=Diabetes
>>713008184
American detected.
>>713008532
European detected.
>>713008666
hail satan
>>713001556
>>713001662
>>713001714
>>713001720
>>713001773
>>713001791
>>713001963
>>713001975
>>713002005
>>713002006
>>713002066
>>713002182
>>713002224
>>713002324
>>713002402
>>713002520
>>713002587
>>713002611
>>713002596
>>713002861
>>713002963
>>713002964
>>713003013
>>713003114
>>713003141
>>713003176
>>713003279
>>713003421
>>713003792
>>713005302
>>713005383
>>713005411
>>713005948
>>713006182
>>713007112
>>713007232
>>713007442
>>713007506
>>713007479
>>713007457
>>713007557
>>713007613
>>713007647
>>713007846
>>713007965
You guys, it's not 15. It's 5 + 10(picture of a single box of fries).
Although we know that (picture of a double box of fries) = 2, we CANNOT infer that (picture of a single box of fries) = 1, because there's no algebraic axiom that declares (picture of two of a thing) = 2(picture of one of that same thing).
See: >>713008132
>>713007457
OH SHIT MAN!!
It took me a while to notice that!
But isn't it breaking the syntax of the setup. It's a bullshit double trap..
>>713008384
The answer you linked is wrong because it doesn't take into account the possibility that a picture of two boxes of fries doesn't indicate twice the value of a picture of one box of fries.
See: >>713008903
youre all fags
>>713008903
(cont'd) More generally, there is no axiom declaring (picture of n of a thing) = n(picture of m of that same thing)/m.
In fact, any quantitative observations about the symbol of a variable cannot be generalized to the variable's meaning. If you could do something like that, imagine the confusion that could be caused by naming matrices by letters starting with A, running out of letters, and naming the next one AA. Is that matrix 2A? Is it A*A? No on both accounts, because it's a separate variable entirely. The visual composition of its symbol has no bearing on its meaning.
>>713009013
Second row is 1*burger + 2*fries + 2*fries=9 where burger=5 so it's safe to say one thingie of fries=1 in the third row.
>>713009511
It would be 15 if 2(picture of one box of fries) were equal to (picture of two boxes of fries). But since that's not necessarily the case, we can't say for sure.
>>713009586
No, it's not. See: >>713009533
In general it's not safe to assume the symbol used for a variable has any bearing on its meaning.
>>713009511
It isnt 15 either, burger fries and a drink make it a combo giving you a better deal.
That would make it 12 maximum, maybe less.
>>713009938
But we don't know that the numbers represent prices. Just because the variables are represented with pictures of fast food doesn't mean the variables themselves have anything to do with fast food. Once again, the symbol for a variable does not necessarily have any bearing on its meaning.
15. Meritard here
>>713001436
The double fries are just a symbol with a numeric meaning apparently unrelated to the fact that they're two boxes of fries.
Nothing actually authorizes us to believe that a single bag of fries means half of the two bags' number.
No solution. You're just a bunch of disgusting ignorant faggots.
>>713009719
Imagine theres no fries and you have:
5 + 2x + 2x = 9
5 + x * 10 = ?
>>713010128
god damn fucking 25 didn't see the multiply
>>713010235
What authorizes you to call the double fries 2x and the single fries x? It should be:
5 + w + w = 9
5 + x*10 = ?
>>713009719
It is safe to assume cause that's what the OP does in every single thread with these stupidly easy maths questions that still catch people somehow.
>>713001436
McDugald is shit tier clown cum filled garbage. Burgher king is the way to go, or Windy's
>>713010415
It's not "stupidly easy," it has no solution. The answer is literally 5 + 10(numeric value of the picture of a single box of fries). That's the farthest you can simplify without making any unwarranted assumptions about the meanings of the symbols involved.
Here we go OP.
5 + 1 x 10
5 + 10
Answer: 15.
>>713010608
Wrong. See: >>713009013
>>713001436
is this a meme or is it that /b/ cannot do math
>>713010351
>double fries
2*x yes
>>713010566
Yeah but the OP wants us to make that assumption. There's no point tagging everybody who got 15 - tag OP and tell that hooligan off. It's the 4chan mathematical standard with these sorts of threads. Is this the first you've seen or are you fighting for 4chan to change?
>>713010772
No, just because single fries = x doesn't mean double fries = 2x. They're just pictures, they have no mathematical meaning unless defined in expressions.
>>713010777
This is the first I've seen of it.
60. I feel people aren't seeing there's only one frybox thing instead of 2
>>713010905
Yes, that's part of the problem, but you're also wrong, because the order of operations dictates multiplication comes before addition. You can't just evaluate an expression left to right without regard to its contents.
Also, even if addition *did* come before multiplication, you still have the problem of what justifies the assumption that (picture of two boxes of fries) = 2(picture of one box of fries).
>>713002295
you need to finish school if you got anything other than 15
>>713010669
In a math exam, the answer 15 would be correct.
>>713001576
30/3 = 10, so drinks = 10.
20 - 10 = 10, 10/2 = 5, so burgers equal 5.
9-5 = 4, 4/4 = 1, so fries equal 1.
sub in, 5 + (1 x 10) = 15.
I could be wrong and it could be 60, but idfc.
Americans thinks it food. Food stops American hunger. Americans see this as more portions and the final question is a regular combo at McDonalds
>>713011096
Then the standards for math exams are not sufficiently rigorous.
>>713011136
trollin
>>713002295
WRONG. Fuckwit
>>713001436
15.
Solved in eight seconds because I'm tired as shit. :D
>>713010902
I'm well aware this is the first you've seen of it. Now stop spamming the thread. Everybody knows what you're saying and would agree with it if this were anywhere but on 4chan.
>>713010902
>No, just because single fries = x doesn't mean double fries = 2x.
>>713006938
a pair of fries = 2
a single fries = 1
other than that the use of bodmas/bedmas/pedmas/math logic seems solid
just need to work on the thinking outside the box
>>713001436
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxN7F0JhIiE
>>713011376
>25
>>713003757
WTF IS THAT GIF
>>713010669
Dumbass, two fries times two plus a burger gives you nine. A burger is clearly five so that means that two boxes of fries equals two. When they ask for one box of fries at the end you divide two by two and get one.
>>713011740
Yeah but my point is WHY do you divide by two and get one. Is it because it's a picture of one of the things of which there were two in the picture whose value was 2? Because, from a mathematical standpoint, that's a bad reason.
>>713011233
You can twist the question around and say that the bottom fries doesn't have a value based on the picture's info. I highly doubt that's how teachers would execute this topic. They'd most likely go with the logical answer 15
>>713001436
A heart attack
