last thread reached limit let's keep em coming!
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
last thread reached limit let's keep em coming!
>>712705654
lmao dude this is some shit. get a life.
>>712705755
>>712706018
>>712705654
>>712705654
>>712705654
>>712705654
>>712706088
>>712706329
>>712706018
>>712705654
seek immediate help you goddamn degenerate
>>712706018
>pic related
>>712705900
>>712706088
>>712706257
>>712706310
>>712706420
>>712706461
>>712706548
>>712706669
>>712706823
fluffies are an artificial life form with the barest amount of sentience to interact with their child owner. designed from day one to be cute and lovable and safe and only survive indoors. once you set them outside their natural habitat, they become a demanding, invasive pest that can ruin whole ecosystems.
>>712706823
wut
>>712707060
>>712707060
>fluffies
you mean furries, right? if so, agreed
>>712707228
nope, fluffy abuse thread
>>712707228
>>712707278
more like ignoring a serious mental problem-thread
>>712707278
>>712707568
you where the creepy one at school
>>712707668
>where
>>712707806
>>712707568
>>712707278
>>712706823
>>712706329
>>712706018
get some serious fucking help asap
Doujin guy here, want more?
>>712707950
moar pls
Stop liking things I don't like!!
>>712705654
I'm posting all the reaction Fluffies I have. (Some aren't Fluffies themselves, but are from Fluffy comics)
>>712707060
THANK YOU
>>712708452
>>712708490
>>712708535
Use these as you please.
>>712707278
What the fuck is wrong with you people. Why do you like this?
And that's all the doujin I can upload for now, off to work.
>>712708039
No more please
>>712707950
Yes pls
>>712708725
Honestly idk why everyone else likes it, I though find it satisfyng and a little stress releaving
>>712708452
>>712708452
more reaction stuff
Instead of reading these, get a snake, buy or catch mice, watch snake fuck up those mice.
>>712708452
>skettie flipping intensifies
>all these normies
ree
>ITT NEWFAG PUSSIES
>ITT NOT ENOUGH EGOR
>>712710792
>>712705654
>Instead of reading these, get a snake, buy or catch mice, watch snake fuck up those mice.
I agree. At least feeding a snake is nature. This pony shit is demented af.
>>712711205
That's apples and oranges you spastic. Fluffies are stupid doodles of annoying small horses dying. It's meant to be cathartic and entertaining. I don't understand how people can get so offended over something so trivial on 4chan.
What's a good site for the multi part comics? aside from fluffybooru, that's kinda rough to navigate.
>>712712186
www.ninegag.com/funnyepicfluffyzXD
>>712711651
these pathetic minds c-can't differentiate between fantasy and reality, morty. *burp* you just gotta let them dangle their stupid, hopeless bait *cough* and and sometimes, they'll just be ignored. morty, that's what they deserve. they don't need any kind of hope of reply, because they're nothing but samefagging trolls.
>>712705900
>>712706088
>>712706257
>>712706310
>>712706420
>>712706461
>>712706548
>>712706669
>>712707087
>>712707194
>>712707228
>>712707415
>>712707668
>>712707928
Samefag. But hey, more reaction pics to add to the collection.
>>712711577
This would be a drawing made by a European. Deplorable fucks.
>>712712272
Just confuses me, this is site where its not uncommon to see a woman's dismembered body in a YLYL thread. Yet cartoon violence something that has been around since the inception of cartoons is what crosses the line.
>>712712331
no trump, supporters are deplorable
>>712712733
>>712712777
Nice gets
>>712712521
well morty, its ... its kinda the "hip" thing to do. if you scream loud enough about the "moral outrage", then the hip young kids may just back up and second guess themselves about how "cool" or "rad" this latest thing is *drinks* if they second guess themselves and start replying with earnest concern or get caught up in the details or semantics of the situation, the troll wins. *belch* that's why you don't reply with anything, morty. are you listening, morty? does that make sense to you?
>>712713297
>>712712777
text
...?
>>712712521
yea thats what you tell yourself to feel normal.
When you watch a woman get beheaded you cant stop it happening and its one person comitting the act.
This is your imagination, what you think of in a creative sense..... and its fucking disturbing.
>>712705654
If dubs, OP will die in the same way as the next fluffy itt
>>712713587
thats the new school gore fetishist. they only care about projecting negative qualities onto the fluffies, old school abusers know fluffies are the victims and the reality of modern life is the real origin of abuse.
>>712713896
for example. take pic related. this mother is obviously in distress, it crys out for help. it crys to its babies to help, even though to even the dimmest of creatures should know that the foals cannot do anything and should run to save themselves.
>>712714492
here is another example showing the difference between being in their designed environment which is safe and everything is provided, versus the real world, where everything is taken, mainly unearned. the mother lashes out at her own kin, not out of spite or hate but because she is hungry and needs food and must have all the help she can get, even from her helpless foals. it shows how dumb, stupid, helpless, and useless these creatures are in the _real_ world.
>>712711205
That's the point normie
>>712714955
this shit however, is stupid and lazy.
>"hur dur imma be edgy and make CARNIVORE fluffies"
>"they blend in with their pointed teeth and may smell of boo boo juice, but fluffies will never see them coming and will never lash out against them in fear"
>"what do you mean they'll get injured? they're tougher because they're CARNIVORES, isn't that edgy and cool?! fuck yeah meat and shit"
please. carivorish fluffies would never exist in light of day because they'd have other more abundant food sources. the only carnivores which make sense were the sewer fluffies which ate "tummy skettis" below the fabled "skettiland", even those were barely holding onto life as it were because that meal was barely digested and had ZERO fiber unlike a normal herbivorish diet.
carnivore fluffies should only exist as last-chance scavengers with zero other options aside from death and a constant influx of dead animals.
>>712716120
Never liked cannibal fluffies either. They seem too try-hard edgy. Fluffy world is enough of a hellhole without including those.
>>712716120
cannibal fluffs in a weirdbox context can be cool
>>712705654
can i request fluffy abuse, but like its kind of hugbox
so for example a fluffy tries to get sketty but trips or some shit like that
>>712716207
>please do not sever my legs, i need those.
>>712716120
pic related is an example of a good single frame fluffy abuse. it's slow, to allow for maximum resulting pain. it's adjustable, to allow for secondary rounds after some healing. it's methodical, as it's only enough to damage the surface layer. it's large enough to not escape easily, yet simple to operate.
while its not something the fluffy did to itself, it's not something the fluffy "deserves" in any way, thus making it a classic tragedy. outside forces conspire to make something undeservedly pained or miserable.
>>712716844
>>712717023
>>712717187
das it mane
>>712716618
weirdbox fluffy carnivore is okay though, because weirdbox relies on the _subversion_ of expectations. if you saw a dog with it's tounge hanging out, would you assume it's different from any other dog? would you assume anything different if it's a cat? no. you'd think "gee, that's probably a dumb cunt of an animal, better let my guard down" and then POW it's subverts that expectation and gets blood everywhere.
that timed subversion of expectation the essence of _comedy_ though, and makes perfect fodder for weirdbox! contrast that to the abuse and tragedy in normal abuse >>712717073
>>712717449
this one also works for abuse because it relies on an indiscriminate force of life, in this case lust, causing a series of events which lead to a painful and _tragic_ end.
>>pic related
i honestly enjoy the world building pics and stories the best though as they generally "get" the basics of what it takes to make fluffy art and expands the world of the fluffies and natural consequences that they'd suffer.
>>712718007
subversion of expectations, comedy, weirdbox.
>>pic related
no conflict / pain plus cutesy, hugbox.
Shameless self advertising! Finished it just hours ago!
>>712716391
classic abuse, albeit unintentional, which makes it even better. fluffies are in pain, but only because they are painfully aware about how different they are. being pack animals, fluffies must have social conformity or they will be shunned, so being made aware of differences between themselves and others are physically painful for them.
>>712717696
i like this one. drop the first frame and its a very simple hugbox piece. but the first frame works off of a classic horror trope, not a fluffy reaction. horror is typically reserved for the impending doom of the fluffy, not the human. which makes this piece both unique and high quality. the quality art helps too.
>>pic related
im not excited about this. it's one fluffy needlessly egging on a litterpal to do its bidding. that alone would make it shit-rat territory, domesticated fluffies aren't purposefully mean, especially to other fluffies. they _want_ friends, they _need_ friends. however, with a different backstory, it would be a better piece. assume the fluffy is a feral, this would account for behavior. assume the litterpal is a former domestic. assume that the litterpal had an "accident" in which it was pillowed and converted into a literpal by their current owners. assume the "stuffy friend" actually smells of this fluffy and is not a toy for the new dominate feral fluffy. it purposefully dragged this toy to the literpal and dumped onto the plush toy for it to clean. instantly, the whole piece is better.
>>712719469
the suffering fluffy is acted upon by outside forces, the abusing fluffy is not acting out of spite but rather marking its territory like many wild animals. the tragedy flows. even still, the words are problematic. the feral fluffy should not be ordering the other fluffy unless it believes itself to be a smarty, which is likely, but not stated. a better, alternate dialog would be "no wan poopy stuffy friend" after dumping on the plush toy itself. there, piece salvaged.
>>712719216
fluffy vs nature tragedy. simple, straight forward, good stuff. the immediate and visceral results are both satisfing and well dawn. the note at the bottom indicates the author is aware of the audience and tastes.
>>712713773
op here, i will not be so easily killed
>>712719986
>fluffy vs nature tragedy
>>712720016
>why.jpg
edgelords and faggots with photoshop. that's all. not abuse, not hugbox, not gore, and i wouldn't call this weirdbox because it's a shit edit of another piece. i'd put it under the "circlejerking and other derivitive works" category.
>>pic related
excellent psychological torture and abuse. subversion of expectation in the abuse as well, revealing the abuse is both possible and useful for the experience of the owner, which is far more important than the pain and tragedy the fluffy suffered.
anybody got any justice abuse? comics, pics, or otherwise? Justified abuse is the most satisfying
>>712720284
>fluffy vs nature tragedy
yeah i guess anything with this element is not abuse-box but rather sad-box because nature is not purposefully hurting the fluffies. the foals are all scarred by the tragedy, sure, but its not abuse.
>>pic related
>fluffy-vs-environment tragedy, sadbox
this is a world building piece as these are the types of images you'd see in an instruction manual for how to avoid shit situations (e.g. get a saferoom dummy)
>>712720284
I like that one. One of the few rare pieces that show fluffies in a more good light then the greedy fucked up beings the mostly are.
And she adopted even a cat in the litter.
>>712720639
>>>pic related
>>fluffy-vs-environment tragedy, sadbox
You sure that isn't ragebox?
I like this one as a slice of life hugbox piece.
God is dead, god remains dead, and we have killed him.
One of my favorite nature-hugbox pictures.
>>712720562
>justice abuse
it's satisifing in all the wrong ways. fluffies aren't meant to have "justice" served upon them because they are innocent by way of their almost nonexistent sentience. they only want love, hugs, and food, generally in that order. as soon as you, as a writer, force a fluffy to behave poorly without a do-or-die force backing it up (hunger, lust, pain), you are projecting your own faults onto the creature.
feral fluffies, of course, are largely exempted from this as they're not in the environment that they were designed for. so, much of feral attitudes and actions should be directly related to either gathering food, gaining safety, or satisfing lust, but still shouldn't stray far from the innocent desires that fluffies seek. you're not going to have fluffies which violently assault other fluffies (lol they can't, they'll just get tired and give up when met with any resistance). likewise, ferals are more likely to talk a mare into "special hugs" than to use force, unless its mating season and the mare is gang raped.
>>712720562
https://www.fluffybooru.org/post/view/17147
The Hills Have Fluffies
This right here is the greatest story Ive ever read. It has not only justified abuse, but incredibly detailed justified abuse.
In my opinion this is the gold standard of writing on the booru. It made me fall in with this fandom and I cannot recommend anything (drawings included) over this story.
You will not regret reading this.
-Robocop
>>712706420
Help? For what? These creatures are so damn slow and clumsy, even a child could abuse them with almost no effort.
anyone butthurt over this shit has never seen happy tree friends
>>712721162
that's just your headcanon though, a vast majority of headcanons show that ferals typically have repressed their natural bioprogramming for more favorable survival instincts and thus have tendencies to be more vicious and more likely to hurt, rape, or otherwise kill other fluffies.
>>712720927
>You sure that isn't ragebox?
Yes, because ragebox means that the fluffy "deserved" it. this isn't the case because you, as an owner, should have known about how to take care of a fluffy from the beginning and provided a safe environment for them. the fluffy was simply trying to find you and cannot hope to comprehend the concepts of "work", "commute", or a "schedule" unless you got an exceptionally smart cookie. they're not a dog or a cat and they're not the "perfect pet" that they were being advertised as. this is why the "impending-doom" tag was invented, which only suggests about what is to happen, but the piece allows others to assume a different future.
>>712721162
>as soon as you, as a writer, force a fluffy to behave poorly without a do-or-die force backing it up (hunger, lust, pain), you are projecting your own faults onto the creature.
That is simply not true. What about fables written in a fluff universe? What about allegories? Fluffies are characters in a story. Having a poorly behaved character or even an evil character doesn't mean the writer suffers possesses those same faults.
Animals most certainly do have temperaments, but lack understanding. I would not label a shark as evil for biting a sailor or surfer. But, fluffies have an interesting in-between state of being something other than animals whilst being lesser than humans. I think there is room for stories of ill-behaved fluffies that are born with those tendencies. Whether one wishes to ascribe that to faulty Hasbio neuroprogramming in-universe or something else would be up to the writer, but it would be a mistake to assume that it is simply projection from the writer.
>>712705654
Is no one going to mention the fact that it's Hank Hill doing this in the picture?
>>712713639
I am astonished by the depth of your thoughts. This post must be the ultimate, sophisticated answer to why fluffy abuse is in general a bad thing, and not just by opinion.
>>712721567]
>ferals typically have repressed their natural bioprogramming for more favorable survival instincts and thus have tendencies to be more vicious and more likely to hurt, rape, or otherwise kill other fluffies.
granted, as i explained in the second paragraph of the link you replied to. however, this does not excuse outright shitty behavior of so-called gritty or urban fluffies, they may have overcome their directed programming, but that doesn't mean it's been entirely supressed. as soon as their needs are filled, they'd more than likely to revert to their childlike manners as they simply do not have the cognitive abilities to plan or execute beyond the current moment. they may be wary as long as they are vulnerable, but once full, safe, dry and warm, they only have social duties to perform, which are largely positive, not violent.
>>712721752
>Having a poorly behaved character or even an evil character doesn't mean the writer suffers possesses those same faults.
its not proof of it by any means, no, however, that is what many of the "new school" gore fetishists do. they write themselves into a fluffy who just so happens to be X% stronger and bigger and faster than other fluffies without any of the negative consequences of a size differential, like needing to eat a vastly larger amount of food or being able to break their own bones by the force they exert or having accidents like other fluffies. they're deifying their own characters into demi-god rpg-fodder for the sake of "artistic freedom", which i roundly object to on both logical and creative grounds.
as soon as you attempt to breed these creatures too far away from spec, they should become a mess of intolerable genetic mutations and unforeseen consequences. to do anything else is to break out of the parameters in which this fictional world is set in and entirely upset the careful balance between rapid breeding, defenselessness and innocence which makes fluffies unique.
>>712722009
but it's still along the line of the "an eye for an eye" logic. Just because fluffies may phase in and out of their intended habits doesn't excuse the fact that they still do terrible things to satisfy those needs. Hell if people where to do the things fluffies do when put in those situations it would mean either being killed or sent to prison.
But for the sake of the conversation i'll use a typical situation to help convey the point i'm trying to make.
If a herd of fluffies pulls the typical shenanigans and finds a hole in my back fence and happens to destroy my garden, i'm going to react in one of two ways.
A: A smarty is going to pull its typical crap and i'm likely going to make him and the entire herd pay for it because damn if i'll let myself be disrespected by a technicolor biotoy the size of a small dog
Or B: The herd reacts apologetically to my irritation being that they have sated their hunger on my garden and reverted back to their intended programming as you said. Due to them not being protected by any laws I could destroy them all and call it justice or simply evict them, seal the hole, and replant the garden though I'd still be irritated whilst doing it.
I may have made this a bit long and a bit of a wall of text but I guess the point i'm trying to make is that you can't just say there is no such thing as justice abuse because the fluffy didn't know what it did wrong. Ignorance doesn't mean it's any less guilty or deserving of whatever consequences they receive due to their actions
>>712722838
>>712721162
>feral fluffies, of course, are largely exempted from this as they're not in the environment that they were designed for.
right, they're not in the environment they were designed for and become an invasive pest which adopt negative behaviors only for survivals sake. i get that.
>>712722838
>>712722009
Or to put it into more of a human circumstance
It's like a man with down syndrome shooting and killing his neighbor after somehow getting a hold of a gun.
He may not know that what he did was wrong but the result was still that somebody died and the mentally deficient guy pulled the trigger
>>712723113
of course feral fluffies are almost always the subjects of stories containing justice abuse content as I agree that you are correct in that a large majority of situations, domestic fluffies don't stray from their programming
>>712723138
>>712723256
again, to both of these posts, im talking about when fluffy writers go above and beyond the pale of simple survival in lawn invasion stories and start getting into things like urban territory wars, fluffies considering lineage effects, herd planning or revenge against other fluffies without outside direction. all of these things have been written and it blows me out of the suspension of reality because these creatures simply do not have the cognitive abilities of even proto-humans, particularly predictive foresight. you take that away from any sentient creature and they only exist in the exact moment they live in.
>>712722766
>write themselves into a fluffy who just so happens to be X% stronger and bigger and faster than other fluffies
Interesting. That's like that one comic with the fluffies playing DnD, and a newcomer had a vampire princess werewolf with demon heritage and the ability to see through time or some damn thing. I was thinking more along the lines of a fluffy that was genuinely mean.
Excerpt from a story I am working on:
(before this, a Smarty and some toughies had coordinated to hurt a very young child. The character just happened to witness the events as they approached).
>The smarty stomped and puffed out his cheeks. >"Dummeh stupy hoomin colt get foweveh sweepies 'cause dummeh no gif toysies an' cause dummeh no-talkie hoomin baby make funny noise when cwying."
>The smarty stomped again. "Wan gif 'ou foweveh sweepies too!"
>He suddenly knew why it unnerved him so much. It was exhibiting something that was very rare in the animal kingdom. It was exhibiting malice.
>When a skunk sprays you, it does it because it is scared.
>When a flea, tick, or mosquito bites you, it does it to feed.
>When bats move into your attic, they are simply looking for a place to roost.
>This thing wasn't scared, wasn't hungry, and wasn't looking for a place to stay. It had tried its best to hurt the child purely out of malice.
>To the best of his knowledge, there was only one animal on the planet that did that.
I guess it appeals to me in the all-that-glitters-is-not-gold way. I think of the twilight zone with Talky Tina. It fits in my head cannon because fluffies are something created out of greed without a complete understanding of what was being done. A child's toy that may not be nice as planned.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_Doll_(The_Twilight_Zone)
>>712723930
>a fluffy that was genuinely mean.
it can be done, but it would require a complete breakdown of everything that fluffies hold dear and have been programmed to be.
>It was exhibiting malice.
see i could see this being played off as jealousy stemming from neglect, but outright malice based in deep seated meanness should be deeply challenging for a fluffy. it would have had to have been spoiled for many months by an otherwise loving parent only to then be _neglected_ which your excerpts suggest.
>>712724461
so the follow up to this would be : what would cause a fluffy to become just straight, outright, mean to everything that it encountered?
being social animals, it would have had to been rejected at each and every social turn. mother, father, siblings, herd. their deep longing for social inclusion and/or parental love would more likely push them to seek other sources of it rather than lash violently, but a fluffy without these social ties would more likely die of starvation or be picked off by predators as a weakling as a feral and ween too soon as a domestic.
>>712723930
the living doll example is a supernatural toy. fluffies still need to eat and suffer damage or else you've dived into weirdbox territory.
