I smoked weed a few times now and was wondering if keeping the smoke longer in your lungs has any benefits?
Also general stoner thread.
Pic related
>>712530650
>>712530650
No it doesn't. If anything it's more harmful.
>>712530650
Smoke in your lungs is bad for you.
>>712530704
Is that a tampon?
its widely known that keeping the smoke in longer gets you more high but at a certain point your just getting a buzz off of oxygen deprivation so dont hold in in forever.. you know maybe 5 seconds or more
>>712530650
Contrary to pop culture, a great majority of the thc will be absorbed within 5 seconds. Your lungs are pretty good at what they do. Holding it in as long as you can won't get you higher, only lightheaded. Plus you get more tar stuck in your lungs.
>>712530886
fuking retard
>>712530886
your wrong
>>712530886
Weed smokers can hold their breath longer than nonsmokers. It's not as bad for your lungs as you think.
Yes, it has some benefits and some negative effects, like almost everything.
>>712530650
I read somewhere that most of the goodstuff is absorbed after about 30 seconds, i usually hold it for maybe 5....no point in making a bad cough or putting my lungs thru more than necessary
Keeping whatever you inhale in your lungs for a longer period of time, will cause you to absorb more.
Plain and simple you should be able to figure this out yourself.
>>712530650
>>712531101
>More tar
Thanks for the info guys
>pic related
A cat which came to hang out with us at our campsite in amsterdam
>>712531396
most people smoke joints, not blunts
>>712531428
That stray cat is probably more harmful to your lungs than smoking an ounce of weed.
>>712531538
bongs 4 lyf
>>712531615
This, glass in general really. But I do rolls a blunt for blunt fridays.
>>712530650
You want to hold it for 2-3 seconds at least I've been smoking for 10 years and anybody who blows out right away is retarded.
>>712531204
this is so full of shit, it's not even funny.
>>712530650
>keeping the smoke longer in your lungs has any benefits?
Yes, but it's not that long of a time. 5 seconds should be enough to get everything absorbed.
>>712531582
It was the cat of the campsite owner. I doubt it was more harmful than my own cat.
I am still alive amyways ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>712531693
I only smoke joints if I have to smoke outside
>>712531153
>>712531201
well you guys sure showed me.
>>712531737
Says the faggot that can't google for himself and instead just shitposts their opinion.
>>712530650
>longer
Yes, obviously, dorklord. Hold it in until you cough and see stars. THEN you will get off.
>>712530792
What the fuck?
guys im a beginner, how many grams should one smoke at once?
>>712532255
420
>>712530650
A more efficient practice would be to evacuate your lungs as much as possible before hitting. Fill your lungs with as much smoke as you can.
>>712532255
no more than 0.5g if you're new
>>712532105
Ikr, it's like an instagram for potheads, fucking retarded.
>>712532255
Less than 1. You put some weed in a pipe and you smoke it, no scales required.
>>712532353
pussy
>>712532255
2 bowls youll be rekt
>>712531204
please shut up pothead
>>712530650
Smoking anything is bad for you. Weed itself has health benefits. If you want to be healthy about it, turn your supply into edibles
>>712530650
Yes, the longer you hold smoke in your lungs, the more high you will get.
But, it's diminishing returns, so the benefit from going from 7 seconds to 14 seconds will be greater than 14 to 21.
At least hold at 7 seconds.
I will never understand people who hit it and then blow out after 2 seconds. What's even worse is blunt smokers who just hold the blunt and let smoke float away.
>>712532623
Vaporizing also works.
>>712531428
I can spend hours petting a cat when high
I dont know why but it makes me so happy
>>712532434
Why smoke more than necessary?
>>712530650
>wondering if keeping the smoke longer in your lungs has any benefits?
It will allow longer time for your lungs to absorb THC. The only real detriment to health from smoking cannabis is gum disease, which is very common. 90% of people have some sort of deterioration of the ginigva.
>>712532550
Alright, alcoholic. I wish we had some real studies so we could actually know the effects of weed, but since there are so many open-minded people like yourself, we probably won't ever know the truth.
>>712532734
if you suck dicks
>>712532862
Why smoke at all? Why eat chocolate?
Why not go vegan and exercise all day everyday and live to 95 years old?
>>712533328
>Why not go vegan and exercise all day everyday and live to 95 years old?
>vegan diet
you'd be lucky to reach 70
What does /b/ think about my plant?
>>712532744
I know what you mean.
The cat was really chill, at one point we started to put socks on it's feet and tail and it didn't care
>>712533328
I'd rather die young than live a boring lifestyle.
>>712533402
Vegans live on average 2 years longer then vegetarians, which live on average 7 years longer than those who eat meat. Just some quick google searches, not sure where you get your bullshit.
>>712533068
Nigga are you retarded?
Smoking anything is bad for your lungs. Weed is less carcinogenic than tobacco and it does have some health benefits. But it's still burnt plant matter, it's not supposed to go in your lungs.
>>712533460
did you fuck up the light cycle? leaves are looking pretty green.
>>712533565
Same. That's why I don't go around calling people degenerates when they drink alcohol or smoke some weed. Unlike the hypocrites that always show up in these threads.
>>712533068
You're incorrect in saying "the only real detriment to health from smoking cannabis is gun disease...", in anyone under the age of 25 smoking cannabis your left parietal lobe experiences reduced white matter and your right parahippocampal lobe experiences reduced gray matter, as does your frontal lobe. In people above the age of 35 your amydgala/hippocampus are reduced in volume and your corpus callosum has impaired structural integrity. There are quite a few issues related towards your brains functionality. It's overall not the worst thing out there to consume, but that doesn't mean it's good.
>>712533635
>But it's still burnt plant matter, it's not supposed to go in your lungs
Can you link me to a study that supports this claim?
>>712533616
>Vegans live on average 2 years longer then vegetarians, which live on average 7 years longer than those who eat meat. Just some quick google searches, not sure where you get your bullshit."As would be expected, the risk was found to be most pronounced among people who also engaged in other unhealthy activities, including having a history of smoking, drinking heavily or being obese."
seems your control group was a little compromised in this one
>>712533635
Actually fun fact, with the the THC by weight content dramatically increasing 30x over the last 40yrs the carcinogenics of weed has gone up, it's nearly as bad, and in some cases worse then smoking a cigarette, 10-30 times more.
Is vaporizing weed odourless?
>>712533234
Whatever dude, I'll be using my volcano so I don't breathe smoke every day AND so the weed lasts longer.
The only bad thing is it takes 3 minutes to warm up.
So if waiting 3 minutes is gay, you're in for a very gay life.
>>712533977
How has carcinogenics gone up?
>>712533538
>>712534031
Depends, if you're using an element IE: a heating element like a coil then yes, if using hot air IE: the volcano vaporizer then no.
>>712534031
No, but it isn't as strong of a smell as weed smoke.
It probably depends on what temp you're vaping at.
>>712533771
I also read that study, my only problem is that its assumption that less brain size equals a problem. In fact women on average have much smaller brains then their male counterparts and they perform equal and higher.
I'm obviously going to be called a pothead for saying there might be benefits to having a smaller brain, but the truth is there is no real reliable info on smoking weed because it's not even legal to research it.
These studies all come from poorly supported government labs that have huge conflicts of interest. I'll believe it when private companies can do their own research. Or if it comes from the EU
>>712530650
No. It's worse for your body, too
>>712534031
If it actually vaporizes and doesn't burn, it will smell very little, more like burnt popcorn rather than weed.
basically anything longer than 4 seconds is pointless. The thc only takes about that long to absorb. heres some stuff i grabbed the other day
>>712531615
They're not much cleaner, just more comfortable to use. I myself prefer a bong, but don't kid yourself with any bullshit about it being clean.
>>712533977
Kys
>>712533771
>in anyone under the age of 25 smoking cannabis your left parietal lobe experiences reduced white matter and your right parahippocampal lobe experiences reduced gray matter, as does your frontal lobe. In people above the age of 35 your amydgala/hippocampus are reduced in volume and your corpus callosum has impaired structural integrity.
You're simply saying "doing x causes y". y doesn't imply detriment in what you're saying and I doubt you have the ability to expand upon the few copied sentences here.
GTFO:
>>712530886
>>712530972
>>712531101
7 seconds is more appropriate.
3 seconds is not enough.
I just don't understand why people don't get lose leaf vaporizer, saves you so much bud because it takes you .2 to get rocked, healthier for you because its vapor and not smoke, and the high lasts longer and feels cleaner
Inhaling quite a bit of oxygen immediately after inhaling weed smoke(without exhaling the smoke) will get you higher
Exposing more of the cannabinoids to your lungs
Technically, that is holding in smoke, and may also expose more tar in your lungs... but who cares, it reminds cancer cells to kill themselves
Instead of exhaling immediately when you feel the smoke in your lungs.
Don't mix it with tobacco, and don't hang around people who smoke cigarettes
I just ran out of weed and I'm in a new town. Tips on how to find good weed without getting stabbed or set up?
>>712534326
Never said it was cleaner than other methods. I just like how they can get you higher with less weed.
>>712534374
i'mm planning on it eventually. problem is i'd normally rather spend the $100 on weed and use papers or my pipe rather than spending that on an apparatus
>>712534374
Inconsistent hits, battery operated, poor vapor quality. If you have to vaporize to eliminate odors or for preexisting health conditions I understand, but no high compares to ripping a bong. It's like you're cheating yourself to use a toy to get high.
>>712534374
Where did you buy yours? And do you like the one you have? If you don't, then which one would you rather have
>>712530650
I used to hold it for about 3 seconds, then I started holding it for about 10-20 seconds after I noticed my friends had the joint much longer than me and I notice I get much higher.
>>712534374
Vaping is good, but it is still very hot. That is not good for your lungs, especially after "smoking" the substance for years and collecting tar in your lungs.
>>712534099
lmao you are so stereotypically stoner
you are living the life m8
I wish I had the money to buy both pot and food
>>712534523
I thought your answer had some connection to
>more tar
my bad. It's cheaper and it's more pleasant, also, it's a lot easier to determine your dose. Bongs rule until I find a decently priced vaporizer as reliable and simple to use as a bong.
>>712534347
I think you might be special so let me put it in simple terms for you, the reduction of white and gray matter in your brain is the killing of your brain cells. It's a detriment because it inhibits your ability to remember, especially since the hippocampus is directly related to your memory. There's quite a bit mroe on it as well if you'd wish for me to continue.
Each spring I hook this old guy I know up with plants for his garden. The old guy knows a writer that just published a book about weed from all over the world. The old guy gave some of the weed to the writer and he said it was some of the best he ever smoked.
That's my story. I didn't really have anywhere else to share it.
>>712534841
It's not pleasant if you take huge rips tho lol
>>712534574
Do it sooner rather than later, it saves you money long term
>>712534580
you're right about bong hitting harder, honestly can't beat a good snap
>>712534838
This was just our room during vacation.
Even though my room at home doesn't look any better
>>712534170
It's not that having a smaller brain is the issue, it's that YOUR brain is not going to be able to develop fully as you age, you're inhibiting your growth and effectively lessening your ability remember what you've learned and with the hippocampus being stunted, your emotions begin to get fucked as well. I'm also an advocate of weed, I consume cannabis on a nearly daily basis, I just like to learn about what it does to us.
>>712530650
OP I've been smoking a long time I know this.
Pros:
If you hold it longer in your lungs you have more time to absorb the THC
Cons:
If you hold it too long and allow it enough time to break down and settle in your lungs it can hurt and isn't too good for you.
Hold it sure, but if you breathe out and don't see smoke, you held it too long.
>>712535055
Still better than a blunt. I've always liked chasing the borderline harsh hit, and smoking through a decent sized glass bong can make it pretty manageable.
>>712533234
this lmao
vaping is for OP
Weed is shit. MDMA and acid are the shit.
>>712534608
At a store, Currently have PAX1 which you can't buy anymore, would consider PAX2/3 or Davinvi IQ
>>712535149
I think your conclusions are premature, but obviously possible. That, and I don't remember reading anything about the study saying they found evidence of inhibiting brain development, simply that it was literally shrinking, but maybe thats just because of all the weed I smoke.
>>712535357
Fun fact, when acid is consumed a good portion of it is stored in your fat, or fat cells, and it'll sit there for a while util that fat is burned off. Basically in the next 10 years you're gunna be trippin' balls pretty hard one day without using it again and it'll be great.
>>712535357
can't do MDMA or acid daily or even weekly
>>712535357
Why not both?
I'm all for weed and all hallucinogens. MDMA can ruin your shit though for realzies.
>>712535170
Wrong actually thc is absorbed into the lungs within the first few seconds. Holding it in longer doesn't get you any higher. You just being to feel the effects of depriving your brain from oxygen. If you want to get higher get more smoke into your lungs with bigger hits.
>>712534937
No I have google. I was expecting you to pull an anecdote from your history in the medical field about how you understand how the hippocampus is altered and your body's response, and whether or not white or gray matter is regenerative or if there's anything exogenous that can effect this or the degree at which someone can or cannot remember something. There's no way to measure it. Short term memory loss isn't really a detriment to your health if the frequency is too little to notice it.
>>712532105
so much dank
>>712535797
>Why not both?
>MDMA can ruin your shit though for realzies
>>712535665
bullshit
>>712530650
Not really, the average stoner simply doesn't understand how efficient lungs are. Do you need to hold in every breath to get the majority of oxygen? No, of course not, it takes only a moment.
Lungs have an immense internal surface area that lets them exchange 95-98% of its contents within a second. Hold it 2-3 total seconds if you really want that 100%.
>>712532682
People like this simply have no understanding of the lung's actual function. This is a fair example of intuition failing.
If you're a real high-chaser then I can't deny that holding in hits for awhile will definitely add some oxygen deprivation to your highs which will boost the sensation.
>>712536016
Doesn't mean I don't ever take it. But you actually have to be careful and mindful about it.
>>712535630
I'm not sure which paper you've read, I'd like to read it, but I digress, anything that kills white/gray matter is inhibiting the brains ability for growth and inhibits it's competitive malleability meaning that it becomes harder to learn and retain what was learned. The conclusion isn't premature because there's no absolute conclusions yet, these are findings that have been proven and that will be expanded upon in the future when more experiments have been done, since in my country weed is illegal but hey, my departments trying it's best to continue the research but trying to get past the ethics committee is a fucking pain.
>>712536178
I'm busting your balls, stimulants just aren't my thing.
>>712535357
Totally different drugs, one can't say which is better than the other.
Just depends what high you're looking for
Psychedelics will make you crazier faster, faster than without taking them at all is what mean, eventually we ALL will lose our minds and have terrible memory.
no its fuckin stupid, you just get more tar in your lungs
>>712536237
Well, once I start googling to find the study for you, everything that comes up is a response and debunking of what I'm talking about. All the studies suggest that it does not effect brain size, so I guess disregard my posts.
What country are you from?
>>712536192
>tfw there are people right now only buying this much weed :'(
Major thanks to the anon who suggested me to start selling via tinder. I've had 4 girls offer to suck my dick for a fucking 8th and sold about 2 ounces since. You're the man anon.
>>712536276
Same. Weed everyday. Hallucinogens every year.
>>712533771
>You're incorrect in saying "the only real
>detriment to health from smoking
>cannabis is gun disease...
>detriment to health from smoking
>cannabis is gun disease...
>cannabis is gun disease...
>gun disease...
kysfgt
Get wats called a pax vaporizer I got a pax 2 and love it
Pic related
>>712535885
I've no medical history yet, I'm just a psych student currently investigating on the effects of marijuana on people under the age of 25 mostly, a few in their mid to late 30's were also involved. When it comes to the gray and white matter being regenerative, it will regenerate for the most part but it'll never be back to where it once was, and if the use is continual the regenerative properties degrade further, effectively lessening white/gray matter count which is neat. So far we've found memory issues with people under the age of 25 that use marijuana on a daily basis in comparison to those who don't use it at all in a simple "remember these 25 words" test.
>>712535665
>I don't know what the fuck i'm talking about
>>712536502
Well i don't smoke that often and don't have money for that much as in your pic.
It's 10€ for a gramm where i live
>>712536134
Not bullshit at all, it likes to store itself in your fat cells, not in the spinal cord like some think, and it'll stay there for around 10yrs or shorter and eventually when the fat cells are burned off either by exercise or your metabolism eating away at it; a dosage will be released and you'll trip balls. Feel free to do your own in-depth research on the subject.
>>712535858
Ok but if you hold it for 3 seconds instead of 2..
Little over half a pound in stock at the moment. Usually buy for 1100 and sell for 2500+ every two weeks.
>>712536499
No it's fine, I like to read and learn whatever I can and try to make sense of everything about weed that we know so far. I'm happy some people are able to actually form articulate responses and challenge what I say instead of just saying "kys" "bullshit" etc, I'm from Canada btw.
>>712537623
I'm not totally convinced acid gets stored in the fat, but if it did, it would not be 100% of the does that gets stored. A person would need to do a large amount of acid for a sustained time and then lose a lot of weight very quickly.
>>712536977
My sincerest apologies for making a spelling mistake, do forgive me I am sorry I am full of flaws like the basic human I am.
It takes 8 to 10 seconds for your lungs to absorb what ever is in it, any longer and ur asking for cancer
>>712537177
>a simple "remember these 25 words" test
I don't think the caliber of testing is high enough to make it into any medical journals, or conclude that cannabis is the cause of the problem.
>>712530650
count to 3
>>712538083
Ok you have been redeemed
Just don't try to take our guns away faggot!!!
and chill with all the studies bro just relax and have a bowl ;)
>>712537950
It's not 100% of it, you are correct because if it was you wouldn't hallucinate for 6hrs after the initial consumption, most of it is used after consumption to do what I said prior, hallucinate, I don't recall the percent that's stored but it's not much however it is enough to make you trip for a bit when it is re-released.
>>712530650
Hey /b/ i want to start some drugs what do you guys recommend?
No hard stuff pls.
>>712538371
I miss going out and shooting some guns, I've been busy with school work, papers, and fucking researching, as I've said before, I am an advocate for the usage of weed, and I do use it on a weekly basis but let me reiterate, I do enjoy learning about it and the effects it has on us as humans, and sometimes animals... Buuuut that's a different story.
>>712536502
fucking hell, we just dont have that much money
>>712538321
I'm not trying to get into any medical journals or trying to get the paper published, what this is, is a gateway for myself and a few other people that are helping me research, to explore the basics of cannabis and what effect daily usage entails. Don't worry we're not gunna fucking use this paper as the God's Hammer to end the usage of weed, we're just learning. What kind of experiment would you conduct?
>>712530650
yes it does. out of like 60+ identified cannabinoids, youre gonna get more of em if you keep it in longer. its only new stoners that wanna talk about the reputed 4 second thc absorption process
>>712538483
Weed and mushrooms, that's it really. They're the most mild of drugs and are relatively safe.
>>712537177
drugs re arrange your priorities mentally. its not the weed's fault that you can't remember 25 words. what a bullshit test. ive smoked weed for longer than anyone i know and it doesn't mean shit to me really. im not gonna claim theres withdrawals, im not gonna blame any shortcomings i may or may not have on smoking weed.. a lot of things in life are super relative. go home
>>712539408
Just because you may not experience A or B doesn't mean other don't as well, the whole "I did this or that and it did this to me therefore that's how it effects everyone" argument is extremely flawed. We understand people are different, we get that and that's why we try to control as much of the independent variables as possible IE: they take the same test, they are in the same age groups, there must be a 50-50 mix of females to males, and more. My good monkey, please do not fly off the handles and start making crazy claims because your precious medicine is being challenged, I ask that you keep an open mind and research it for yourself.
>>712539408
this came out wrong. i mean to say that priorities get re arranged when a person takes drugs. with weed, the arrangement is controlled by the person i believe. any memory loss has to do with how a persons priorities were re arranged at the time. which they may or may not want to take accountability for.
>>712539951
I guarantee I know more about weed than you. I've been learning for seven years and I'm way past anything you're at. you would probably tell someone to hold their smoke in for 4 seconds max because the THC is absorbed in that time. fuck off retard
>>712540029
>>712539951
Forgot to mention, the participants were not under the influence while taking the test.
>>712537823
Not the person you're responding to but I have the similar situation going on. I have a question to ask that is bothering me.
So wouldn't it conclude that you should smoke cannabis after you've fully matured? Or does it still affect it afterwards?
I used to be on 9 psychiatric meds.
Now I'm on 2 and a blunt or 2 a day
PLUS A LOT MORE PRODUCTIVE.
>>712540159
Did I claim to know more? No, do you know more then I about it, there is the possibility, I'm not 100% sure on why this was brought up, or how your argument holds weight to what we've been doing. Thanks for the input?
>>712533893
im a super hard smoker but you are a retard questioning this. obviously you are not supposed to inhale any smoke from any burning substance.
>>712530650
i can hold my breath for 2 minutes now, only use to be able to do like half of that
>>712531204
SOME can hold breath for a long time because they hold it in on full inhales. Its similar to lung capacity training that some divers do by expanding the lungs minorly. Don't kid youself thinking that the weed is giving you super lungs
>>712540289
From what we've been looking at, people over the age of 25, since their brains are fully developed, the "negative" impacts weed has are pretty well all gone, in 30-44yr olds there's a reduce volume in the brain but that's extremely minor. IMO after the age of 25 you're fine to smoke it as much as you like, there's little downside to it. Good question, I like the way you think.
>>712533771
While you may enjoy regurgitating all those big words, all that sums up to is a minor (~3-6) iq point drop, and that's in smokers who smoked stupid from 13-25+, a small loss in neuroplasticity and the inhibition of short term memory formation while you are blazed
Not exactly as horrific as you make it sound, especially when compared to other recreational drugs (I.e. alcohol)
Tl;dr stop fearmongering you muppet
>>712530650
many people will argue that it does not, and you are only getting hight off oxygen deprivation at that point...
However I have been smoking for 15 years, and honestly feel like holding hits for at least 10 secs gets you way higher than just inhale and exhale.
>>712532623
This
>>712539187
>What kind of experiment would you conduct?
FMRI of those under the influence and not under the influence of cannabis observed over 90-120 day period and possibly determine if heavy use has any effect on activity in the limbic system.
>>712540523
>i can hold my breath for 2 minutes now, only use to be able to do like half of that
That's not in your lungs, that's in your mind. You can hold your breath for 5+ minutes if you really worked on it. It's just pushing past the point where your brain tells you to breathe.
>>712533234
>>712535318
I lol'd
>>712533977
Sick bait brah
>>712534782
Thats just oxygen loss to the brain. Same thing happens not smoking weed. But yea, you will feel higher
>>712530650
>I smoked weed a few times now
Noob.
>>712531055
>It's widely known
You're an idiot.
98% of the absorption occuring in your lungs happens almost instantaneously. However, tagging a drag, then breathing out in steps will swirl the smoke around, allowing for more absorption, keeping the air in your lungs still does nothing.
>>712535170
Kek
>>712540743
The thing is. I'm 23. I'm fit as hell. Working on abs. Planning on going to law school soon.
Right now, smoking weed is significantly cheaper and feels a lot more beneficial than when I'm on my 9 meds.
I'm not stupid though. I slowly reduced my intake and then got on weed. I found the balance to be 2 pills and weeds like "Golden Goat," "Blue Dream" and "Berry White."
They get me stimulated and extremely productive.
>>712540743
Sorry. I went on a tangent.
What I meant to get to is...
Am I screwed? Lol.
>>712542218
>The thing is. I'm 23. I'm fit as hell. Working on abs. Planning on going to law school soon.
AHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
This is one of the worst things I have ever read on /b/.
>>712537623
Wow...
>>712542475
I'm high as fuck. Lol. Sorry.
>>712538138
Haha what? Want to show some case notes on that one doc?
>>712537093
My original is still working after 3 years.
>>712537729
bro
tfw im a broke buy struggling for a g
feelsbadman
>>712542475
All of this occurred after I started smoking and got off the anti psych meds.
I was a fat fuck beforehand.
>>712542555
ME TOO. Also, nice trips.
>>712530650
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5db_1479656352
>>712542724
Forgot picture.
I'm going to buy a sticky brick Jr next pay.
>>712542957
Lol. Thank you.
just because you smoke weed and not cigarettes doesn't mean your lungs aren't harmed from the carbon and ash coming off the burn into your lugs
just vape get a magic flight box
>>712543108
Cigarettes and Marijuana
So I'm thinking of moving to colorado to get a job in the legal weed business, as it seems like in 5-10 years it's going to blow up like dot coms. Anyone have any experience doing that? I'm going to try to use my degree in anthropology and experience working as QA at a plasma center to convince employers I can work in compliance/QA.
Don't even smoke weed btw.
>>712543839
you need to go to oaksterdam in Oakland CA and learn how to pretty much be a botanist and learn how to work hydroponics, and be ready because it's not as easy as it sounds, get ready to learn a little chemistry
>>712534326
>>712531396
Any time you ignite and inhale carbon-based plant there's gonna be residue left in your lungs anon-kun
>>712531711
mike nolan?
>>712543839
You are too late,by like two years.
BTW the medical sector in California is way ahead of the other legal weed states.
>>712530650
Fill your lungs, count to 5. Then exhale, it's that easy
>>712544677
Even to work in compliance? I don't really want to work as a grower, I don't have any experience or skills in it.
>>712545004
if you want to reap the benefits of the "pot boom" you need to be a grower/owner, you'd probably make minimum wage or maybe a little more just being the cashier or whatever the fuck
>>712545356
I probably shouldn't be asking potheads who don't know what compliance/QA is.
>>712533893
lungz r made for air
>>712533616
>>712533402
well i at least respect you for arguing from a health stand point, instead of think of the animals bullshit. I personally only eat poultry and fish, and it is 20% meat 70% fruit and vegetable. would go vegan but i love the taste of a blue rare steak too much
>>712532363
when you're such a faggot that you come into threads not made for you so you and advertise it.
