Feminists deliberately walk into men. Act all surprise when they collide.
Wait a sec, I always move out of the way first, am I a woman?
I'm confused. According to feminists, who is expected to yield?
>>711798583
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4uVzkWvCf0&feature=youtu.be
>>711798583
>Feminists deliberately walk into men.
This only applies if they're altering their pace to collide with the men while the men are trying to avoid a collision.
Otherwise they're just walking on a straight path, the same as the men.
>>711798819
Men. Women>Men. It's 2016.
>>711798583
>decides not to move out of the way for men
>sometimes runs into men
Okay, so? Sure, 28 seems like a lot, but how many men has this woman walked towards? And how is this a masculine thing? She'd probably be running into women too if she didn't decide to only do this with men.
>>711798583
I'll chicken-race anybody, I don't care what gender they are.
Typical feminist logic; take a non-gendered issue and present it as a female issue.
>>711798583
Isn't that progress?
>>711798583
bruh i will bulldoze a bitch say my bad and keep walking. fuck your sheepish protest
I'm a big guy so I always have to move for everybody. Except on shopping days then it's no holds bard
>>711798583
seems like only closet autists wouldnt move
>>711798583
i've noticed that lots of retards do this these days. i'm 39 and going to a big university. i spent 4+ years at community college with tons of people but somehow, they never made this happen. at big university there are fucking rejects from OTHER STATES and these shitheads QUITE OFTEN want to walk side by side and _I_ have to fucking get out of their way. i just shake my head internally because never in my life in tucson, arizona have i run into (pun almost intended) shitheads like this.
the moral is that if you come to MY sweet little city, WE have courtesy. anywhere else, they seem like blind retarded fuckheads. have fun out there.
since this was a feminist thread:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MBaEEODzU0
>>711799282
>>711798583
>assuming they identify as men
Cis scum.
>>711798583
Heh, I'm pretty sure if the average guy walked without moving to accommodate traffic he'd probably walk into a few dozen people also.
>>711798583
i'd grab by the pussy
>>711799145
This. The experiment is shite because she's not including totals. This is what happens when people fail science and decide to go into gender studies.
there is no right of passage rule between pedestrians, but if you wanna be a faggot about it, there is one for boats
the smallest and therefore easier to maneuver is the one that needs to get the fuck out of the way
its simple common sense, who have bigger chance of getting hurt if you wanna collide head 1st ?
the one most afraid of the consequences move 1st
>>711798583
I'm confused as to what this is suppose to mean. Can someone explain? Is the experiment meant to highlight that men are sexist and refuse to move out the way of an approaching women? Really? Surely there are better ways to highlight sexism within society; this just seems childish.
>>711799369
I don't get out of the way for people that do this, unless it's going to hurt. They usually move at the last second.
>>711799418
Not just because she's not including totals, but because she's only testing one group and then acting like the fact that that group is the only one with results means anything.
I just move out of the way as if I was a motorcycle weaving through traffic.
>>711798583
tell her to try it on trains...
>>711799549
Her "experiment" is full of problems, I was just pointing out that the glaringly obvious one was that she was only including the data that confirms her bias. She also lacks any controls, has no hypothesis, etc. All she's proving is that she's a bitch.
>>711798583
its got nothing to do with sex its a societal expectation for people to have the courtesy to move out the way of eachother otherwise you would just get a bunch of people bumping into eachother like tards
>>711799153
This
>>711799145
>Typical feminist logic; take a non-gendered issue and present it as a female issue.
probably not but thats because men aren't passive little bitches.
>>711798583
Look it the only way they can get someone to touch them
>>711799282
awww yeaaaa
Maybe the fact that this bitch sounds like a rude cunt has something to do with it? It's all in the body language. 9 out of 10 times I'll move out the way of an approaching person. That's because I'm polite. However, if the person approaching me looks like a rude cunt I'll put on my death stare and refuse to budge at all.
>>711799006
Dont be a retard
Either they are lying or they are colliding on purpose just to say it happened
>>711799410
Right? Its like if cars didnt yield to each other there would be more crashes
>doh doy
Also 28 out of how many?
>>711799665
She's also drawing a really bizarre conclusion that men are willing to collide with people to assert dominance (muh patriarchy - it's like some conspiracy shit), instead of the much more logical assumption that people simply aren't expecting someone to bee-line into a direct collision course with them and make no attempts to slow down or turn.
>>711799761
That's not really funny and really just goes to show why feminism is still needed. I too use to hate feminism, then I turned 15.
>>711799808
Best way to barge is simply look past people, if it seems like you haven't noticed someone they'll move, unless it's the tard in OP's picture.
Fuck, I've seen this. Didn't realise it was a feminism thing, thought it was just an unwarranted sense of superiority...man, I should've caught on sooner.
Anyway, I see it coming a million miles away now. What I do is walk straight towards them, watch them brace for impact and then last moment step out of the way. It's hilarious watching them tumble and try to recover.
the experiment should include walking into other women, and then tallying up the number of times that led to wild lesbian sex
>>711799369
I just stop walking dead in front of them, they are forced to walk around.
>>711799877
And thought by agreeing with them you might get laid, bad news.
>>711799861
>Either they are lying
Or telling the truth.
If a bitch did this to me, I'd lean into it and knock her on her sorry ass. Then I'd politely smile and say, "oops,my bad, didn't see ya there", and keep walking.
>>711798583
he forgot to say that she's a bit on the fat side, so that collision is somewhat elastic (and unavoidable)
now that I know girls do this, I'll just whip my dick out when I see one attempting to bump me in the name of feminism
>>711799877
Really? I used to be for feminism, then it turned 2012
>>711798583
>walk into people
>straight into people
>collides
>'''wow its so weird gurlz XD''
Srly 1st country men has lost the touch of how to deal with women. You have lost the art of putting a bitch in her place. No wonder why so many cuck and trap memes bloat your culture.
As a fat man I can say that most young-middle aged women still do not seem to move out of my way. Older women do tend to give some way and men usually do the I give half you give half should twist.
I've also noticed that children seem to almost always walk right into me as well since they never seem to be paying attention to what is going on around them.
Perhaps there is a trend here.
>>711799875
>instead of the much more logical assumption that people simply aren't expecting someone to bee-line into a direct collision course with them and make no attempts to slow down or turn.
Shes actually saying that this expectation is a result of male privilege.
>People will simply move out of my way because I'm a man. I don't need to pay attention or move out of the way myself.
>>711799422
10/10 argumentation. nice.
I always move half a person to the side. When the other person does the same, we don't collide. Otherwise we'll crash.
>>711799877
and then you posted this
>>711799422
Too bad we're not boats.
People always move out of my way, unless I'm in a shitty ghetto neighbourhood.
>>711799877
And then you'll turn 18 and realize that modern feminism is a fucking joke.
>>711800212
the common sense part still applies
retard
>>711800091
Right, but that's retarded, and she'd be running into just as many women. It's not a gender issue, it's a 'person acting irrational in a public space causing awkward situations' issue. People don't expect others to charge directly into them without breaking stride. Hell, some of those 28 men probably TRIED moving out of the way, but weren't able to in time because usually both people are stepping aside.
>>711800212
boats are piloted by people
people that are moving on a common space
the boating rules were made by people
>it follows.
>>711799006
If they are looking around, they take notice of him, make a direct path towards him, and fail to alter that path, then that's intentionally walking AT the men.
Ignoring the fact that this "experiment" doesn't follow the scientific method (no controls, no hypothesis, no statistical analysis... we don't even know what that 28 is OUT OF) consider this from the viewpoint of the men:
They're thinking about their day at work, or their wife, or dinner, or their dog,... they aren't looking at this girl and thinking "I'm so going to walk into her". Instead of being preoccupied with strange fantasies about bumping into strangers they're living normal lives in their heads. They take brief notice of the woman while barely paying attention, slightly alter their path to one side and adjust their body language to indicate their intention unconsciously, and keep going expecting that she'll read their subtle cues and the two of them will work together to avoid a confrontation
Instead of working together, feminists expect men to do all the work and leap violently out of the way while paying attention to every woman in the area to look out for possible collisions
>>711800091
Nothing to do with being a man and everything to do with being an asshole, worst people in traffic, asians. It baffles me how people who originate from densely populated countries can't figure out how to navigate traffic in western ones. Nearly every time I'm sidling past someone blocking a shopping isle, it'll be an asian chick with her trolley obscuring the lane.
>Be tall, broad shouldered, and fat
>Still try to move out of the way of people and be polite
It's really not that hard.
Walk into me, and I'll show you what happens.
>>711798583
They should try this with walls to see if walls are sexist.
>>711798583
ITT: women who secretly want to be brutalized by men
ITT: there are no women on the interweb
ITT: idiot talking trash
i like turtles
Whenever I am going straight for someone, I usually just twist my shoulders and step slightly to the side. It shows them which way you are going and they usually mirror it. I find that when I don't do this and just walk straight I always have to do that stupid fucking dance where me and the other guy both keep trying to move out of the way at the same time and only keep getting in each others way. Can't say I'm surprised she walked into all these guys. If she was really walking in a straight line without indicating her path or even stopping when collision would happen, she would run into a bunch of people. Stupid cunt. I hope somebody checks her ass and puts her on the ground.
>>711799877
Feministas unite!
>>711800212
They might be a boat-kin, and obviously massive due to their mental illness.
>>711800445
I think you've summed it up, a slight twist of the shoulders indicates which side you're going to pass on
>>711800445
But didn't you hear, anon? She ran into 28 men, but 0 women. How could it not be a masculine trait?
>>711800267
>the common sense part still applies
No it doesn't.
>>711800299
It really doesn't.
Boats are heavy vehicles floating on water. Momentum doesn't act on them in the same way it does on two people walking down a street. In that case it makes sense for the smaller boat to just scoot on out of the way.
In the case of humans both people most likely have the same or at least comparable amounts of mobility.
>>711798583
Is this you OP?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=46_d5XJ7L5c
>>711800212
i identify myself as a brigantine, you republican white male cis scum
>>711800270
>and she'd be running into just as many women
Considering the assumption that women are more likely to move out of the way, she wouldn't be.
[spoiler]test[/spoiler]
>>711800514
I identify myself as a US navy carrier
>>711800310
She probably didn't even run a single t-test. Dumb cunt.
>>711800310
Your example implies that the woman always notices the man and the man never notices the women.
What about men who notice the women but still don't see the need to alter their path?
>>711800555
why would you waste nice trips on such a retarded comment ?
>>711800555
yea but the thing you are missing is
>the one most afraid of the consequences move 1st
>>711800310
>Instead of working together, feminists expect men to do all the work and leap violently out of the way while paying attention to every woman in the area to look out for possible collisions
But thats what women do.
>>711800403
Walls built by men are simply used to support existing institutions, and are therefore inherently sexist. The fact that these walls not only don't get out of the way of women, but also cause injury to women walking into them is a clear sign of the patriarchal nature of structural engineering and other applied physics fields.
>>711800593
and that right there is a testable hypothesis something she failed to have
>>711800669
>>the one most afraid of the consequences move 1st
So women should always move out of the way of men because they're afraid of them?
>>711799877
4chan just doesn't know that those crazy SJWs are not actually feminist and think that by hating on feminism they are hurting the SJWs but they do the complete opposite.
>>711799537
>this just seems childish.
lol dude, feminism in a nutshell
>>711800593
Whose fucking assumption is that, though? Moronic women who think testosterone makes men want to deliberately collide with people as a show of dominance? We're not fucking dogs. We think about things other than 'Gee I wonder how I can prove my alpha status to THAT guy I've never seen before'.
>>711800690
The guy in the video obviously skips leg day.
>>711800654
>What about men who notice the women but still don't see the need to alter their path?
What about them? you imply this is a point of masculinity and not a point of arrogance.
>>711800654
they are assholes and not indicative of an entire gender....
>>711799884
Its though, go downtown where the money is, and both men and women with superiority complexes pull this shit. Im usually fine with moving up until the point i can tell its some stupid assertion of dominance, then i dont move, because fuck them for being an asshole.
>>711800748
you are assuming too much here buddy
skinny guy against a fat woman, I bet the skinny guy would be more affraid of a collision with a landwhale
actually any men would be affraid of said collision
>>711800690
>That webm, lost
If you show me you are going to move at all I'll meet you in the middle with a considerate dodge. If you tough guy straight at me I'll lean the fuck into it and bruise your shoulder. I thought that's how everyone did it?
>>711800374
That's some proper feminism right there:
>be girl
>"when attacked by a man go for the balls"
That guy in the most progressive manner goes for the woman's balls to show her: "you are just as worthy as any man"
Good for both of them.
Yay third wave feminism
>>711800555
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL MY FUCKING SIDES
If a 5'6 woman weighs 140 pounds which is near avg. and your average neckbeard comes barreling along at 6'1 260 how is that anywhere close to the same amount of "mobility" wtf are you some sort of anthropologist that studies ambulation? no? then stfu with your baseless claims and astonishing lack of stats.
humans have something called SEXUAL DIMORPHISM which means one of us is statistically larger...its not women.
>>711800740
>and that right there is a testable hypothesis something she failed to have
Oh totally.
>>711800769
>Moronic women who think testosterone makes men want to deliberately collide with people as a show of dominance?
No one is talking about deliberate collision except for people like you who are trying to be hyperbolic.
Shes talking about men feeling comfortable enough that when they're walking down the street they don't feel the need to duck and dodge people, because others (especially women) will simply move out of the way.
She challenges this expectation by not moving and as a result, collided with multiple men.
>>711800592
here come dat goy
>>711800748
That strawman tho.
No its if you dont wanna get run into get the fuck out of the way.
>>711800776
>you imply this is a point of masculinity and not a point of arrogance.
Isn't arrogance a masculine trait?
>>711799877
B8
4/10 for reply
>>711799915
this is what I do automatically. I stop. ball in you court, bitch.
>>711800941
This. If you arent gonna try to get out of the way, you are going to get collided with. Its not complicated
>>711801011
No, it's a trait of the pampered and spoilt
>>711801011
is it ?
>>711798685
Yes.
>>711800969
>how is that anywhere close to the same amount of "mobility"
Because it doesn't take that much effort for a large human to step to the side and the work it does take is in no way comparable to boats.
>>711799107
C U R R E N T Y E A R
>>711801004
>No its if you dont wanna get run into get the fuck out of the way.
You're putting this work solely on women. Why can't men get out of the way and why do they feel it's okay to get run into?
>>711800972
Yea but you just said right there that her experiment is tinged with bias. If you arent moving out of the way of men and ARE moving out of the way of women then obviously it seems like men arent expecting to move. In reality if you dont wanna get walked into then move.
>>711800969
Both of you have ample mobility to take a single step to the side before you walk into each other. It's not hard to do for anyone except ham planets and cripples.
>>711801011
Not at all. I know far more arrogant bitches that wouldn't adjust their path than arrogant dicks
>>711801011
You're right I've never seen an arrogant female before....
>>711801197
Actually most of the big boats are highly maneuverable with thrusters located all over them whilst most small boats make do with a rudder/swinging prop
>>711798583
>Men not stopping and standing in place to see if the girl is doing it on purpose
>Men not exploiting the probability that the girl would most likely stop too as an excuse to flirt with her
Her sister must be an ugly bitch
>>711801057
I'm glad I'm not the only one.
>>711800972
>Shes talking about men feeling comfortable enough that when they're walking down the street they don't feel the need to duck and dodge people, because others (especially women) will simply move out of the way.
>She challenges this expectation by not moving and as a result, collided with multiple men.
Feminism: Tackling the difficult yet oh so important issues.
>>711801197
boats can typically travel at speeds over 80 knots (150 km/h) in calm waters, over 50 knots (90 km/h) in choppy waters, and maintain 25 knots (47 km/h) in the average five to seven foot (1.5 to 2 m) Caribbean seas.
CAN YOU FUCKING DO THAT NIGGER? NO YOU CANNOT. NOT EVEN ON LAND.
>>711800972
>Shes talking about men feeling comfortable enough that when they're walking down the street they don't feel the need to duck and dodge people, because others (especially women) will simply move out of the way.
>She challenges this expectation by not moving and as a result, collided with multiple men.
how can she know that the men are not moving strictly because they are feeling comfortable enough that others (specially women) will move ?
does she have any control group ?
did she follow any scientific approach ?
or you are just assuming that because you dont wanna give in that the thing you are defending is very stupid ?
>>711798583
....and here I am never moving out of the way for anyone while I'm walking. Male or female 'cepthe for mothers with strollers and young children.
>>711801251
Still strawmanning. If the guy doesnt wanna get run into he too will move. Do you notice how motherfuckers arent running into each other all god damned day on the sidewalk?
>>711800374
The mysogny is stong in this one
>>711801262
>Yea but you just said right there that her experiment is tinged with bias.
It's a bad experiment. That's just a fact. That doesn't mean her assumptions aren't without weight.
>If you arent moving out of the way of men and ARE moving out of the way of women then obviously it seems like men arent expecting to move. In reality if you dont wanna get walked into then move.
This assumes that she was born minutes before the experiment and the thought to do the experiment wasn't the result of realizing that she spends a lot of time and effort moving out of the way of men.
>>711800690
At least they set her down gently. I was expecting them to chuck her over the side lmao
>>711800972
Right, but who thinks that men operate like that?
And it's a bad experiment because she's deliberately walking at these people and creating confusion by defying common sense and making no attempt to avoid. People don't collide when they're being predictable, ie. both concerned about running into people and thus both willing to dodge. Who says she collided with those men because they thought she'd move? They probably didn't notice her, or tried to move but collided because they expected her to also move (which, as mentioned above, is the logical assumption). The data is also useless because we have no control to compare with, and she didn't test it with women. We also don't even know what the 28 is out of. There is nothing to learn from this besides the fact that this woman has a strange fantasy to collide with men and feel victimised by toxic masculinity.
>>711799107
Not for long with that meme president, kek
>>711801304
Yea an oil tanker is as maneuverable as a speed boat because it has extra thrusters....
>>711799376
Underrated kek
>>711800038
NO! FEMINISTS ARE EVIL MAN-HATERS! THEY LIE AND THEY HATE MEN! THEY'RE ALL DECEITFUL AND LIE-Y. IT'S TRUE, I WATCH THESE GUYS ON YOUTUBE AND THEY MAKE ME REALLY ANGRY SO THEY MUST BE RIGHT! REEEEEEEE
>>711801365
>Boats can go fast
What does this have to do with anything?
>>711801426
So and let me get this nice and straight...Women dont move out of the way of other women?
>>711799877
Bait or not, if this was a you ger /b/ you would have just had your asshole....ruined
>>711799282
>>711799376
Samefag
>>711801474
Not him, but can all of you faggots just shut the fuck up about boats? It doesn't apply to shit.
>>711801474
Oil tankers aren't maneuverable at all because they get maneuvered by tenders, watch a cruise liner berth, shit is milimetre perfect.
>>711801564
mo·bil·i·ty
mōˈbilədē/
noun
noun: mobility
the ability to move or be moved freely and easily.
>>711801611
>Anything applying to anything on /b/
Anon, dafuq are you doing here if you take things seriously
>>711801580
white women must get out of the way of nigger woman
if we need to think add lesbos and trans people into the mix it'll add a whole 'nother degree of complication
>>711800374
>falcon punch
>Fucking topkek
I turn sideways and walk past as close as possible without touching, it makes people extremely uncomfortable. I love the looks.
>>711798583
I have actually noticed women doing shit like this recently. If I am walking and a bitch does not move out of the fucking way I wait till i am about 2 steps from them and just stop. Litterally just stop. They won't stop because they are beta little bitches and they will have to walk around me. Go ahead and walk into me while i'm standing still bitch you'll walk right into my fucking jutted out elbow and then i'll look at you like you are fucking retarded when you hurt yourself on it
>>711798583
What hasn't she tried this with doors built by men?
>>711800212
I sexually identify as an Atlantic Cruiseliner.
Your sexism and disrespect of extragender identities is triggering and offensive.
>>711801611
>discussing who shall move when in a collision course
>exemple of existing rules of who shall move when in a collision course doesnt applies
good job proving you are a retard
>>711801251
>Why can't men get out of the way
They can. Generally speaking, men tend to signal their intended path and walk in such a way where they won't collide without making last second path adjustments.
>and why do they feel it's okay to get run into?
Given the choice between bumping into someone and not bumping into someone, I think we both know what people in general will select. That said, it is unlikely to cause injury.
Here's a question for you:
How is it that feminists will make things like this into a gendered issue whilst knowing so little about the body language of men? I've always wondered how they come up with these ridiculous interpretations that is so far away from reality it first isn't funny, then loops back around into funny again.
I wish there was a body swapping machine that would allow the woman in OP's post to be in the body of a 6' 180 pound man. She'd almost certainly be getting into fights right and left.
>>711801580
correct, women are constantly colliding, even in cars, open YOUR EYES MA FUKA
>>711801775
THAT WONT WORK BECAUSE FEMINISTS ARE SO MUCH BIGGER THEN ME, THEY'LL KNOCK ME DOWN :(((((
>>711801877
Gold tier post
>>711799877
I observed how women are treated since 2004.
They got more privileges, feminism is only an extra measure for that.
>>711799006
Actually, it really sounds like they are purposefully walking into people. Most normal people attempt to take a path that doesn't collide with other people. This is why you don't run into several people every time you walk somewhere.
>>711801843
They start with conclusions, then look for evidence to support it, instead of real science, which looks at the evidence and then creates a conclusion from it.
Reminds me of those Creationist 'scientists' who ignore everything that doesn't vaguely support something from the Bible, specifically so that they can say that they have scientific evidence for things in the Bible.
>>711802117
this
>>711799877
Guaranteed replies
>>711802117
Look up 'hypothesis'. You logical, rational person, you!
>>711799877
what happened last year that made you stop hating feminism??
Just line the bitch up like a Scott Stevens hit on the blue line. It's like you cucks forgot how to hip check
>>711799877
REPORTED UNDERAGE!
>>711799905
You'd need to film it of course for evidence.
>>711799877
nigga you still 15 you cuddled faggot.
>>711802291
I think YOU should look up 'hypothesis'.
>>711802304
prolly got rejected by some boy she had a crush on
>>711802334
I also turned 15 once. Am I underage too?
>>711801832
I'm sorry, are you a boat? No? Then shut the fuck up.
>>711802405
OOOOH U MESSED UP! REPORTED
>>711798583
I move 50%, if the bitch doesn't move her 50% too, I'll ram her out of my way, doing the same to kids.
Feminazis are cancer
>>711802370
I think YOU should.
>>711802405
Have you recently grown into feminism?
>>711802291
>>711802370
I think we can all agree that hypo-thesis has nothing to do with science, and is more an english 101 thing.
>>711798685
Same. You just have manners.
>>711799905
exactly
>>711801326
yeah the other way is just move slower than them, the person who wan't to navigate the fastest natrually moves around.
>>711802424
>ignore the common sense
>wonders why no one takes anything you say seriously
>>711802519
no you're a woman, just unzip your pants, and you'll find that down there u actually have a CALCULATOR. I think thats whatthey call it these days. I'm so out of the loop
>>711802472
Yes. Do I look like some angry edgelord who watches anti-feminists on YouTube all day? NUH.
>>711800068
Sexual liberation wasn't liberation to have sex, it was liberation from sex. We're all so desperate cause women are holding it back that we fight one another over stuff like this. It isn't that we can't put a bitch in place, its that every time we do we get at least 4 other men rush to defend her and attack you.
>>711802681
To answer your first question, yes
To answer your second question, idgaf
>>711800654
Honestly, that probably happens at parity between men and women. Or rarely at all.
>>711802454
Hypotheses are initial expectations and educated observations, which determine what you're testing and how. Results can and often do differ from the initial hypotheses, hence progress. The types of 'scientists' I mentioned have a specific agenda they're trying to prove, and already have their conclusion in mind. They're looking for things that they can interpret to be evidence of their gospel, and reject that which doesn't.
>>711802588
>ignores common boating law
>acts superior, because probably a car, and not a boat
>thinks land better then water
>refuses to get out of boats ways and causes collisions
jerk
If you expect the person who is as broad as two of you to be the one to try and find a gap to shuffle through you're just a cunt. It takes much less effort for you.
>>711802731
It was literally a liberation to have sex without consequences via the use of things like contraception, condoms, morning after etc
>>711802809
>>711802784
I had no idea you were this ignorant of social sciences.
BUH DAH NUH REAL SCIENCE.
Educate yourself.
>>711800690
>>711798583
no1 moving out of the way results in collisions.
PATRIARCHY
>>711802767
Yep partys or never, such logic. Good thinkin Captain logic. Will you teach me to come to irrational conclusions based off of things i think also?
>>711798583
>so far she collided with 28 men
>how many didnt she collide with?
>where the men not looking where they going?
>scientific
>man and woman collides
its men fault
takes both not moving to have a collision, not only men
>>711800130
Has no one played that "oops sorry, oops sorry" back and forth game even before getting close to a person? We can read the tiniest body signal and know which direction each person will move easily. If you're not making eye contact or giving body signals though there's nothing to read.
>>711802942
... I'm talking about Creationists who try to dispute evolution... That's absolutely a matter of real science, not social science.
Either way, social science uses the same definition of hypothesis as standard science. Social science wouldn't be accepted if it maintained biased agendas, calling them hypotheses, and ignored evidence that didn't support it. Why did you even bring that up?
But women literally do this shit all the time especially at stores. I actually find men moving out of the way more than women.
>>711798583
I love to set picks on random people in the street and hallways. I also like to drive my car into oncoming traffic and then put it in park and watch as cars swerve to avoid me.
>>711802784
What about history though, not that i agree with these Christians or anything. but i'm saying, the story they've told us of history, how can you think that is proved by science? We look at evidence and make assumptions, which we then experiment with and it becomes science law. But, other then carbon dating, science proves nothing of what we've learned as "the history of us."
>>711802942
I'm not saying it follows a different method. Derp. I'm saying the studies have already been done. This was simply pointing out what we already know.
>>711803324
what
>>711802938
get a job harambe
>>711798685
tits or gtfo
>>711803038
this^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
a thousand times this ^^^^^
every side of every event has at least 2 perspectives
also was she injured? i can't imagine they bumped "that" hard.
>>711798583
if this happened to me i would stop and call her out on her shit.
>are those eyes in your head fake? do you not fucking see me walking here?
>you have literally half the sidewalk to yourself, would it kill you to not be a selfish cunt?
and they can't do shit, i'm a minority. and everyone knows minorities > whites
and it wouldn't be the first time. i actually have more problems with groups of teens. fucking herd mentality. get some self-esteem, fucking millenials.
>>711803416
I have one
collecting welfare
>>711798583
>Doesn't walk on the right side of the sidewalk in direction of travel
This isn't a gender issue, it's a proper etiquette issue.
>>711799588
awww yeaa
i can see the feminist now as she sees the hot white steam vent from the patriarchy engine,she shakes as she stands on the platform not knowing if this insult to females is directed at her,
a man walking by sees this woman struggling with an oversized bag,holding out his hand he says "excuse me miss,do you need help with that?"
tears begin to stream from the feminists eyes at the oppression she is being subjected to,all the men watch as her case is lifted one handed into the luggage area,the man locking eyes with her and grinning chauvanisticly
"t-thank you" she stammers
he licks his lips and punches his nipples before replying "it was my privilege"
it is too much for the rest of the men on the patriarchy engine,they begin roaring like beasts and grabbing at their crutches at the sound of his woman's oppression
>fuckin trains
>>711798583
Where does she live that this is happening?
Usually when people walk, they alter their path so as to not hit anyone well before they actually get near the person. If two people walking opposite directions do happen to get near each other, the most common thing is that they both move.
>>711803573
common sense
>>711799409
shitty ass bait if you ask me, faggot.
>top kek trying this fucking hard
>>711800212
I identify as a boat, how dare you?
>>711803314
i bet some PIG of a man hit you once too... what a dick face
>>711799422
You don't have the right to walk into people who are standing still.
>>711800972
This experiment is tainted with lots of personal bias. 1. She operates on the unproven assertion that only men lack basic courtesy. 2. She assumes all women will move always. 3. She assumes these unproven assertions are true and uses them to generate a preordained conclusion. This is the creationist model of experimentation.
>>711803619
I'm guessing that's the main reason why she ran into people at all. Her making no attempt to avoid running into people defied expectations, causing the men to have undercorrected their pathing, due to the assumption that she would also move.
>>711803395
like how can you just be 100% confident, that is is the way it is??? How are things not open to interpretation. I bring up history because you were talking about the bible and Christians.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFPtjXFfczM
give this a watch maybe you'll see what i'm getting at. AND ITS FUNNY!
>>711803745
so ? who is arguing that you have that right ?
we are talking about 2 people moving into each other
both are moving
both are in a collision course
This thread is scientific as fuck. I appreciate each and every one of you glorious, glorious bastards contributing with science and understanding.
9/10 thread overall.
>>711803002
It happening at parity is logical, why would men bump into people any more than women? Do you have observations to prove this hypothesis?
>>711798583
I actually find it more annoying that antisjws go out of there way to call attention to dumb shit like this in an attempt to make like minded individuals start going "rabble rabble rabble them vs us we're so mad."
This is exactly what sjws do. You are both annoying the shit out of me, just mind your own business, faggots. Do we have a name for you yet? Social anger warriors?
>>711798583
>man moves out of the way to be chivalrous
fucking pig, i can walk around you on my own
>man stays in same place
fucking pig, trying to assert your dominance?
Feminism: Literally standing in the way of peoples progress and complaining how they are the victim.
>>711803955
That's not expressly mentioned in the above comment, he was claiming that moving out of the way if you're smaller is your only option, and I'm pointing out that comparing us to boats doesn't fucking work because boats can't stop, and we can.
>>711804104
>man punches the feminist in the face and knocks her on her fat lard ass
'uckin' fig
>>711804103
Given that sjws are now the establishment, somebody needs to call them out. If nobody ever does, then this sort of bullshit goes mainstream. The consequences of silence are already apparent.
>>711803508
also does she seek out collison courses with other women?
>>711804103
Oh look, its someone who sits on the fence post complaining about both sides of an issue to show their "superiority"
Kindly get fucked.
>>711802117
I hate to break it too you but that sums up all of the big bang theory as well.
I prefer plasma cosmology
>>711798583
How is this possible?
As a pedestrian you walk on the left side.
If someone is walking towards you that means they're walking on the wrong side and they are the ones who should yield.
When I walk around I make half an effort to avoid people the other person has to their part to avoide me as well. If you don't fuck it im not sorry I bumped into you.
>>711804279
>sjws are the establishment
Somebody missed the election.
>>711804433
I'm sorry. Are ladies running into dudes causing some real problems? Is this an issue?
You faggot ass crybabies are going out of your way to get mad at shit. That's sjw right there. I picked a side, I'm against this dumb shit. Any sjw bashing in this thread on the basis of ops post is a hypocrite
>>711804013
do i? no, just like you proved me wrong with this statement, right?? so much evidence backing that up. you sure did good! gj captain logic! at it again
>>711804104
great analogy!
>>711804160
rofl love it!
>>711801341
omg that's so satisfying to watch.... Anybody got more?
>>711804336
now now, that wouldn't be proper feminist research. of course not.
>>711804228
so you are looking for things outside of what was mentioned, trying to find exceptions and pretend its a rule to prove a point
again, its common sense
if you are in a boat, moving, and see a huge ship coming your way and you drop anchor instead of changing your course, expecting the other ship to move away, you are a retarded
and you'll prolly lose your licsense to pilot a ship
people are not boats, we dont have the same rules, but the common sense still applies
if you see someone moving your way and you just stop and stand in their way on purpose waiting for them to move, you are being an asshole
>>711803539
So you would respond to someone bumping into you by acting like a twat?
>>711804831
im sure if women bump into her, they do it cuz of internalized patriarchy
>>711804584
So the Republican party wins one election, that doesn't change the establishment on its own. Remind me, what are univerities doing in the wake of this win? Who runs the education system right now?
>>711804587
Please cite exactly where I said I'd proven anything. Please point out where I said I disproved any assertion you made. What I said, and maintian, is that there is no reason to assume sidewalk collisions are a male dominated phenomenon. Why would you think this happens at any rate other than a rough parity between the sexes?
Most of you people have probably never even made sex to a woman and even if you did she probably didn't even deserve it
I understand this is anecdotal, but I work in a large grocery managing a meat department, from my experience of standing stationary while putting stuff on a shelf, women hit me with shopping carts and those mobility scooters on average once every 3 days. Most I can remember most guys doing is idling too long near me or reaching over me to grab stuff. This could be biased if it's true that women still do most the shopping and money spending. But I'll be honest, working in retail has made me hate women. Most the time when I get hit while stationary they scoff, sigh, and act like it's my fault. It's pretty belittling.
A good portion of gentleman will also tell me "don't want to stop a working man" if I ask them if im in the way and they need to get through. I've never had a woman say this to me. Even the women I work with despise women while shopping.
>>711805170
0/10 bait
>>711798583
Were all 28 of those men black? I suspect they were.
>>711805056
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaNaSG1KpWQ
>>711804778
he beats the shit out of her haha
>>711798583
LOVING the feminist research OP. rofl i imagine this chick lives in a big city. Meaning she probably walks by 1000+ guys a day if she's walking around. 28/1000 =2.8% of the guys she saw that day and intentionally walked at didn't move out of her way. I think we all know the best option out of this is to create gendered side walks. Just like they used to have a white and colored drinking fountain, we should in this day and age continue segregation, but switch it to the genders. From now on, all men should walk on the right hand side of the walk, and women on the left! eureka!
>>711800060
Jerk off furiously while staring them down
>>711805238
if they were, the only reason they bumped her was to steal her wallet/purse
>>711800949
he probably broke her hipbone though
>>711803826
Its funny but a total fallacy. Scientific write documents so that the logic can be easily replicated. This is why in physics class children can follow these "experiments" and find the same conclusions.
>>711800060
>>711805318
dicks out for feminism
>>711805133
There is literally an anti sjw white nationalist in the white house now. (Bannon, not Trump)
Why do colleges matter in this? Do you get triggered by the existence of women's studies?
Education is state by state. You know like... the state Board of education in each state.
>>711801341
tbh she is pretty tought taking 4 of those
>>711800690
anyone have a link to the sound for this?
>>711805254
That little cunt deserved it. It so satisfying to see a woman being an absolute cunt and getting physical because she think she can get away with it. Then BOOM! Reality!
>>711805519
please dont pretend to be dumb, its retarded and it doesnt work
It's because we're thinking so hard about how to spend our extra 23%
>>711805133
I work at a university... nothing fishy going on at mine everything is running as smoothly as ever as far as i can tell. Who does run the educational system right now?
>>711798583
Some scumbags have no common courtesy to move if they're blocking your path.
>>711805684
>asks stupid questions
>calls others stupid
Ok, stupid.
>>711805519
That's not going to fly for me. You are using anti sjw and white supremacist to mean the same thing, that's utter bullshit. Furthermore, even him being there has little impact. He won't change what universities are forcing on their students. He won't change the narrative being pushed by the mainstrram media. He won't change anything, and neither will Trump. The damage social justice has done will take decades to clean up, and it won't get cleaned up.
>>711798583
Never been a time in my life I haven't stepped aside for a lady, just seems rude not too.
>>711801341
>Not one-shotting a woman
Jesus fucking christ.
If a woman deserves a slap atleast do it with som class.
Drunk-brawling a woman is about as pathetic as it gets.
She could basically fight him with a chance of winning if she wouldnt have gotten so surprised.
>>711805862
Which university?
If sjw types aren't running many universities, then why are schools brining in trauma councilors over the election? Why are segregated spaces being given serious consideration? Why are dissenting opinions being silenced?
>>711800548
Because she doesn't attempt to walk into any women.
>>711799369
It's a common problem, mate. Here in England at Uni every fucking cunt insists on walking 3/4 abreast with their pals basically taking up the entire pavement.
Granted most of them will make a token effort to move and let you past without collision but a lot of them have no concept of good manners and you've just gotta plow through them.
How are these kids being raised if they don't even grasp that taking up the whole pavement is a stupid thing to do?
>>711805904
not even the same anon, but you are making retarded assumptions/claims and then pretending to be stupid when the other anon asked you about it
just pointing out that its easy to see what you are doing
feel free to keep on being stupid
stupid
>>711800654
What about women who notice the men but still don't see the need to alter their path?
See, I can do your retarded baby-logic too.
>>711806196
The anime face didn't give it away?
>>711804778
Meaty rage fistballs are the best kind of punches.
>>711806180
Washing state, Idk man, I'm not very involved with the politics of the school as i am no longer a student there, and just work there. But i haven't even heard about what you're talking about. Sounds pretty spoopy to me!
>>711805998
>same thing
No, I am saying he is both.
>little impact
I hope you're right, but he's basically the guy whispering ideology in Trump's ear, along with mega idiot christfag Pence.
>mainstream media
More like social media, like the origin of this post.
>universities forcing...
Please enlighten us. Seems to me college educated voters liked Trump just fine, even women. Are you using anecdotes about post election hysterics to be anti education?
>>711800077
Yes. The trend is that young adults (especially young women) have been infantilized by our 'everyone gets a trophy' culture and as such, are not equipped for the adult world.
They're basically large toddlers.
>>711804587
The burden of proof is on you.
>>711801743
i stop walking and just stand still. anyone male or female can walk the fuck around me. i am not altering course.
>>711806279
Please enlighten me, wise anon, which was an assumption?
Was it saying that Steve Bannon is anti sjw and alt right?
Was it saying that education is run by each state?
Was it asking the other anon a question about what he said?
Also, you can't really blame me for responding to the wrong anon, anon. You can't go randomly respond to people and expect them to know it isn't the same anon, anon. I don't feel stupid for that.
yea sure, 28
bitch gonna get punched someday
>>711799877
It's funny because people would rather have cancer then talk to you.
>>711806431
But anon, who was making them trophies?
:0
>>711798583
I move out of the way of anyone, girl or guy, or even a child usually
*omega*
>>711799861
>>711800310
>>711802098
Actually, I'm not sure if you read what the girl in OPs pic wrote. Maybe you're to biased to believe that a person that considers themself to be a feminist can actually be anything else but a lying bitch, or maybe you just lack fundamental reading skills.
To clarify, it says:
>"Whenever men walk towards her"
>"she doesn't move out of the way first"
It clearly sounds like she is walking a straight line and someone is walking towards her. Yeah, there is no hypothesis, there is no control group, whatever. This is not an experiment, it is an observation. Please, pull your heads out of your asses if you actually want to do something against toxic feminism. Your comeback is both weak and insulting, which is fuel for those who think that men actually rule the world.
Also, this is not about men having to yield in a situation like this, it's about common respect and attention. Don't let your little egos get crushed by a post on Facebook that you didn't understand, you fucking manchildren.
>>711799665
Who says you need a hypothesis for an experiment?
>>711800212
But I identify as a boat anon kun
>>711798685
I always move out of the way, but only for one reason: I live in a 3rd world country (Roachistan) and I don't want to get stabbed over nothing. It could happen.
>>711806771
u mad
>>711806564
was it assuming that 1 guy in the white house automatically changes the whole establishment ?
The trickiest part is to move first, they are always tending to spot you. But I'm superior to see them before they see me, lol.
>>711806357
No, I am for education. What I am against is the fact that a bullshit ideology has been given an unchecked primacy on numerous college campuses. What I am against is the blatant silencing of inoffensive dissent and the punishing of people who have done nothing wrong. These things are happening in schools all over America, and it's bullshit. And the post election hysteria is a symptom, not the disease.
>>711806885
That's literally what I said, right? That's the case I made. Good job little buddy. I said, and I quote: "Steve Bannon entirely changes everything."
Gold star for reading comprehension.
Of course, I'm sure you're not the same anon.
>>711805284
agreed anon, its the only logical step.
>>711802453
Thing is, kids will take the lesson they learned getting fucking bowled over and apply it to their lives so that it doesn't happen as much. If some kid runs in front of you you're doing it a favor by kneeing that little shit stain in the side of the head.
>>711798583
I can see it now. Bitch is probably walking on the wrong side of a sidewalk toward oncoming people. I hit people that do that as it is arrogant and rude. Use your side of the sidewalk. Esp when some dickholes walking three/four wide and refuse to move the fuck over. Those animals deserve the death penalty.
>>711798583
God damn I didn't know stupid feminist still exists
Also are girls that stupid they forget how to act in public and share the side walk?
>>711807015
>fact: bullshit ideology has been given an unchecked primacy on numerous college campuses
Who has been punished? Can you give me one anecdote/fact? I usually just delete emails from my crazy republican uncle.
>>711799877
Is Tumblr raiding again?
>>711801664
Speed is a factor that's important in mobility but isn't exclusively what determines if something has high mobility.
She's walking like a man so she's pushing other women out of the way so she's perpetuating gender stereotypes, just as bad if not worse.
>>711798583
I hope these women aren't driving
>>711801738
newfag detected
>>711798583
This is literally how football started, the ball was added as an afterthought
>>711807605
We'll almost. Passing was added as an afterthought.
>>711807455
Oh really? What kind of men are stereotypic to not pass the women first?
>>711807605
top kek
>>711799877
I mean, it's a bit funny
>>711799409
2016
still using words like "Cis Scum"
2/10 for reply
>>711807676
You for starters, little fag bitch, now get the fuck out of my way.
>>711807342
There are mandatory consent classes for all male students presuming they're rapists for one.
>>711807092
yes you did said that you dumbfuck dishonest cunt
other anon said sjw is the estbalishment
you tried to be smirky and failed horribly by saying he missed the election
so other anon said
>So the Republican party wins one election, that doesn't change the establishment on its own. Remind me, what are univerities doing in the wake of this win? Who runs the education system right now?
and you replied
>There is literally an anti sjw white nationalist in the white house now. (Bannon, not Trump)
indeed assuming that 1 person changes the whole establishment instantly
get fucked, retard
I'd like to see some woman walk full force into my fat ass
She'd hit the ground so fast
>>711807759
100% gay.
>>711799877
>>711800758
You do realise this isn't tumblr.com right?
>>711798583
I always hold the door for anyone behind me.
99% of the time, men thank me before passing through.
99% of the time, women blow past without saying a word.
alternatively, I've found the majority of men in front of me will hold the door open.
I have never seen a woman hold a door open for anyone.
Next time a bitch does this to me, I'm gonna punch her right in the jaw, the same as I'd do to any dude that deliberately walked in to me. EQUALITY BICHES!
>>711808265
W0men are superior to gays, no equality for you, sry.
>>711807803
I'm sorry you feel so incredibly booty blasted, anon. Allow me to clarify.
Republicans won the Presidency, House and Senate. One of the most influential people in the party is a white nationalist anti sjw, which is important. Here you have a situation where one party is in power, the party that consistently rallies against anything it perceives as social justice or feminism, and the republican president has a champion of it bending his ear.
I'm not saying Bannon changes everything. I am saying he's an important part of shaping future policy, and that he has a potentially very receptive audience. Trump's not in office yet, we're talking about the future here.
So what is the establishment? Is it the republican establishment we kept hearing about the entire election? The one that Trump seems to be sucking up to anyways? Because they're not exactly champions of black lives matter either.
>>711807794
I'm looking for a source for this happening. All I can find is breitbart and gaurdian op eds railing against the idea of it. Pls advise.
