please answer honestly, autists
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
please answer honestly, autists
C'mon fags
>>707726085
1. Fuck yes
2. At least two besides myself
3. Gun control means using both hands
4. Nope
5. I'm really jonesing for a S&W Model 617
is this a joke?
shit tier thread
Fuck off back to facebook
http://www.myrapeporn.com
>>707726085
1. Of course.
2. Not certain right now; there have been moves over the years and guns have come up missing. At least 3.
3. We need better education and more respect given to firearms, not necessarily outside control.
4. Yes, but never bagged anything.
5. I have for a couple years now but keep putting it off. Learned rifles, not handguns and I've been meaning to get a CCW for some time.
y'all fagits suck
Yes
Most
More
Yes
No. The need fot guns is for manlets who need to feel secure when their 'amazing government' 'falls apart'.
>>707726085
1. Yes
2. Most of them.
3. I'm conflicted on this. It's more complicated than either side is willing to admit.
4. Yes.
5. Yes. I'd like a Glock 17 and an AK.
1. No
2. None of them, pop had one on his property 10 or so years ago though.
3. My country already has 10/10 gun control. No fatal shootings in several years.
4. No
5. No, literally no need.
>>707726085
1. Yes
2. Many
3. I'd like less guns but it doesn't work that way.
4. I shot a grouse once
5. Yes, for myself and my girlfriend. She's tiny and I believe the world is in a high state of tension.
1. Yes
2. 0
3. Have never thought of it
4. Nope
5. Never had the idea
>>707727300
If you're looking for home defense, 20 gauge shotgun. For personal defense, I'd just carry pepper spray.
only fags have peper spray
>>707727694
It's far more effective for personal defense, unless you have extensive training and experience.
1 no
2 idk none that i know of
3 it doesnt matter
4 no
5 maybe one day to kill myself after reading this thread
>>707726085
1. Yes
2. None
3. Way more guncontrol
4. Nope
5. Nope
>>707726085
1. Yes.
2. Most if not all, excluding those to young to legally own them.
3. Much to complex of a subject. More in some areas, less in others.
4. Yes.
5. Yes.
>>707726085
yes
none
more
yes
yes
1. I have fired hundreds of guns
2. I think everyone owns at least 1
3. Depends on the state
4. Moose, bear, Saskatchewan wolf
5. Next purchase will be a colt delta elite because I'm not a glocksucker.
>>707726800
get robbed
>>707726085
1. No
2. 1
3. More
4. No
5. Yes
Britfag chiming in
>>707728081
Just out of curiosity, are Canadian wolves more polite?
1. Yes
2.All of us, the dog keeps a glock in his asshole
3.More, but depends on the person's crime history
4. For pedophiles
5.yes
>>707728104
Get shot to death fumbling for your pistol
Yes
2
Just close the gun show loop hole
Yes
Yes
>>707726085
Canadian here.
1. Yes
2. No
3. US definitely needs more. Canada is fine.
4. Yes
5. Yes
>>707726085
1. No
2. Not immediate family but uncles have guns
3. Less gun control
4. no
5. Maybe but probably not because I am aware that I am emotionally unstable and in a wage slave so I don't wanna spend money on a gun
>>707727915
...it can be blocked by an outstretched hand.
This is the kind of fucking stupid "everyone knows" bullshit that leftist idiots just repeat to each other.
>oh, firearms are USELESS unless you're an expert!
Nations have been overthrown by peasant armies with rudimentary firearms. Colt's revolver was The Equalizer because it let the small and weak fight back against the large and strong.
You don't have to be a god damned competitivw marksman to put down a home invader. It happens all the time. Friggin CHILDREN do it.
>>707726085
Nice try, Shillary. You can pry my gun from my cold, dead hands
1. Yes
2. Everyone
3. Too vague a question to responsibly answer
4. Yes
5. Yes
Make a strawpoll you lazy cunt
1. yes
2. Just myself
3. It depends. If you want to hunt or go target shooting, disc shooting -- yes. If you need protection -- yes.
4. nope
5. not sure, maybe get a shot gun
4. Nope
5. I'm really jonesing for a S&W Model 617
>>707727915
It's really not. Three hollowpoints to the chest are a bit more effective, I think
1. yes
2. I'm not sure. I would guess ten?
3. I live in CA where we already have pretty strict gun laws. I think some other states need more while CA needs less.
4. yes
5. yes
1.) No, because I don't have a small dick
2.) 0
3.) probably more
4.) No
5.) No
>>707727466
There's psychos that train themselves against pepper spray or if you're on drugs you'll really not give a shit.
A handgun at least may have stopping power.
>>707726085
1. No
2. 0
3. same
4. yes
5. no
Get your Laws fixed Americans...
Germanfag here
>>707726085
No
I guess everyone, but they are registered to my father
Better background checks, waiting periods are ok as they are, psych eval should be required before purchase
no
eventually, but i would rarely use it
>>707726085
>no
>zero
>in my country (netherlands) I think we've got it figured out pretty well
>no
>no
>>707728596
How would you extend gun control?
>>707728596
Have fun with your muslims fag
>>707726085
1: yes
2: at least five people
3: less nigger, I live in Chicago
4: No
5: absolutely
>>707726085
Do your own high school homework faggot. Not your personal army. Kill yourself.
>>707726085
1 yes
2 everybody
3 less
4 yea
5 nah
>>707728525
Sjw faggot
>>707726085
1. Yep. Live on a farm
2. Everyone owns like 5 guns in my household
3. Less control
4. No, guns are tools and hunting isn't my job
5. Yep, I'm eyeing a handgun for my 21st bday
Pic related, my baby
Yes
0
Less
No
No
>>707726085
1.
yes many times
2.
four maybe more
3.
less
4.
once
5.
yes
>>707728778
"I need to compensate for my tiny penis, with this huge ass gun, because otherwise I feel powerless"
>>707728161
Naturally
>>707728335
I'm fine with guns for home defense. Shotgun works great. I'm just saying, most civilians are unfit to carry firearms in public. I can also bet you've never had to point a gun at anyone.
>>707726085
1. yes
2. 2
3. about the same
4. no
5. yes, Tanfoglio Witness Elite Match
>>707726085
Britfag here who travels to the US regularly
1) Yes
2) None
3) Undecided
4) No
5) No
Guns are in America's culture. They're kinda fucked whatever they do gun control wise tbh.
>>707726800
Where do you come up with a preposterous reasoning like that? What do you believe in if you dont believe in the government and you also dont believe in self defense? Manlets? Lolwut you fuckin waste of flesh lmao @ your pathetic life get cucked and robbed and raped
>>707726085
1. Yes, plenty of times
2. I am the only one
3. Fine the way it is as far as I am concerned. I just think safety/law training should be mandatory for ccw, and that all sales and transfers should have to go through an FFL to prevent felons from getting firearms.
https://www.atf.gov/file/61446/download
This is the form that is typically filled out, I am saying that it should always be required, and to close things like the gun show loop hole.
4. no
5. I buy and sell them from time to time. Not really a fanatic, I've concealed carried since i turned 21, and will forever.
>>707728902
>Liberals straw man by projecting their own cock insecurieties on other people to win an argument
>>707726085
1) Yup.
2) I'm assuming immediately family. 1 - heirloom, doesn't fire.
3) Gun control - too vague. I think that we need to actually enforce the laws that are on the books.
4) Nope.
5) Probably not.
>>707728447
The idea is to avoid killing people if you can...
>>707726085
1. Yes, I was infantry in the army.
2. None now. My father was USMC for 23 years, and growing up there were guns around, my mother made him get rid of them though, and nobody has had one since.
3. In the US, more. Much more. I'm not saying get rid of the 2nd amendment, but there is no need for pistols, assault rifles, shit like that. Shotguns and long rifles are all people need.
4. When I was deployed we hunted wild game, yeah, not before or since though.
5. The only firearm I owned personally was a Sig P226 I bought before being deployed to Afghanistan. I sold it when I left the army. I don't have a need/use for a firearm now, so no.
>>707728161
They tend to apologize before tearing out the throat.
>>707726085
Yes
8, that I know of.
Better background checks and gun show loophole. But no limits on mag size or type of gun/caliber.
Twice.
Yes.
Yes.
Almost everyone, including most of the women
Less gun control, more people support
Have been hunting a lot. Haven't recently because family is getting old and I don't really have anyone to go with. And I struggle to get tags when I want them
I will when I have money. I own a pistol and inherited two old rifles and two old shotguns.
>>707727146
Perfect
>>707729247
>shall not be infringed
>im not saying we should get rid of the second amendment, but I do want to tearmost of it to shreds
1. Yes
2. Me
3. Less
4. No
5. Maybe
I'm a Britfag so its hardly applies to me. (not a farmer or a posh cunt though)
>>707726085
No
2, 50%
The same.
No.
>>707728330
I admire the stark honesty of your answer and how that plays in to your answer of "less" on the control question, highlighting the assertion of self discipline. Interesting perspective. If only evryone had discipline and reasoning skills we wouldnt need weapons at all
>>707729247
You of all people should know how much of a pain in the ass armed civilians in an invaded country are, why don't you want Americans to fight back if we're invaded anon?
Guns are for pussies, Eurofags use fists like real men.
>>707726085
1. Nope
2. One direct relative and one inlaw
3. The most popular type of guns used to commit crimes should have more controls placed on them. Hunting rifles and shotguns don't really seem like they need as many controls as a Glock.
4. Nope
5. Nope. I do like game meat, so I would not need one for hunting. I do not need one for home protection as there is generally someone at our house 24/7 and it is pretty obvious when someone is home. No one is going to try to break into a house where they know someone is there.
>>707726085
Kys with this shit tier thread
>>707726085
1. yes, during military service
2. none
3. more guncontrol
4. not in the literal sense
5.no
>>707728213
how is this an argument... oh right
1.) Yes, was at my gun club shooting this monday
2.) Not sure about my extended family but close family, Me, Dad, Sister. Little bro is too young, oldest sis doesn't like guns
3.) Doesn't matter if we have more, less, or the same as long as its the choice of the individual.
4.) No but me and my dad are going deer hunting this year.
5.) I have TONS of guns I have on my up to purchase list. (Up next, SBR Krinkov or SBR Scorpion Evo)
Yes
Almost all of my family
No gun control
I've gone hunting a lot
Hell yes
>>707729671
That worked really well in Paris.
>>707729227
For petty crimes? I agree. If someone is intending to hurt me or my family, gf, etc. I don't want to just stun them and let them run away to commit the same crime on someone else.
>>707726085
1 No
2 None
3 A bit more, not saying you should kill all guns, but some policies there are are fucking retarded and then it's no wonder people shoot up schools.
4 No
5 If I got the opportunity, maybe (65% towards yes)
>>707729862
hon hon hon rekt
>>707729788
>Almost everyone, including most of the women
edit* didnt see the control cut off for 3.) We need LESS gun control
>>707729671
Shouldn't you be out getting culturally enriched again.
>>707726085
1. countless times. got marksman medals in military.
2. zero
3. fewer
learnToEnglish.txt
4. nope
I don't live in a hunter-gatherer society. I have access to excellent stores.
5. nope.
I’m not a retard who falls for the sales techniques of gun corporations.
>>707729671
I'm sure you do...
Yes
2, me and my father. More if you count extended family
This isn't a real question. As many as wanted
Yes
Yes
>>707729862 Worked brilliantly for Orland and 9/11 for you also you fringe.
There's a much bigger list also.
>>707726085
1 yes
2 yes
3 yes
4 yes
5 yes
>>707728315
Sorta like pointless registries that have done nothing and arbitrary bans that deprive citizens of their property?
1. Yes
2. All of em
3. Less
4. Yes
5. Certainly some fully automatics and Cal .50
>>707726085
1. No
2. None
3. The same ,never seen a gun in my life
4. No
5. Nope
>>707730011
>Marksman
>Dat pizza box
>Lowest possible qual
>mfw
>>707729999 Had a curry tonight so I've already had enough for today.
In regards to the picture; you all still PTSDing over a war you lost to jungle monkeys?
>>707726085
1. No.
2. None.
3. Less. I want my god damned auto shotty.
4. No.
5. Yes.
>>707726085
Yes
Me and my brother (who is a LEO)
Less "control", no additional legislation, but enforce the laws we already have and get rid of private sales. That would literally solve the problem of people who are not supposed to have guns from having them. Most LEOs and veterans actually support banning private sales, but also support the ownership of guns to people who can legally possess them under the law and constitutional rights. The problem with the way the laws are now, anyone can buy a gun from a private owner with no background check. That's the problem. Otherwise, I say if you're legally able to possess a firearm, i.e., no conviction of felonies, not mentally disturbed, own as many as you like. I have a several pistols, long rifles, and shotguns.
Don't like to hunt. I get bored, but I have been.
Saving up for a custom 1911. So yeah.
>>707726085
1 yar
2 probably half of the men, immediate family: 2
3 more, of course cause of guys like this: >>707726220
4 nope
5 nope
>>707730468
My brother is a Sagittarius
>>707726085
1. Sadly not
2. Zero
3. More
4. No
5. Of course
>>707730011
If they had said more, less, or the same amount of gun control -Laws- fewer would be correct. But they just said more less or the same amount of gun control. Fewer is incorrect in that insrance. L2english etc.
>>707727001
Underrated post.
>>707730598
that makes sense.......
>>707730145
"shoot the planes!"
>>707726085
Yes
1 immediate family
Same (Aus)
Spotlighting at night, not a trip
Already got one
>>707727001
is it? Read this and let me know if it changes your mind any
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DLk5bOxXsZtWsqVMDUtyk54-X1xzxPsUoueGgafPv-s/edit?usp=sharing
>>707730011
How do you fuck up rifle qual?
>>707730338
Less than 10% of troops see actual combat. It would be dune coons... not jungle monkeys my crooked-mawed friend. The rest of the world is the United States's bitch. The pedantic penis envy and parallels you [poorly] try to draw between gun ownership and personal constitution, is just silly. As always you are discussing us, not us you, since you are irrelevant twats and you know it.
yes
no one
i don't give a fuck
no, i'm not gay
no
>>707730011
>bragging about marksman
>>707731319
wow edgy
Hello FBI. Hunting for personal info already? Whatever.
Yes
0
>Canadafag
No
Probably not
>>707726085
no
0
less
no
fuck yes
>>707727466
>If you're looking for home defense, 20 gauge shotgun. For personal defense, I'd just carry pepper spray.
Confirmed for doesn't know shit.
>>707726085
Average American here:
1. Yes, many times.
2. Only I own a gun in my immediate family. Brother is a felon and the rest are afraid of guns. I think a cousin of mine probably does; he's former military.
3. Really, guns aren't nearly the widespread epidemic media makes them out to be. To be honest, It's demonized a lot more than it should be. I'm not for or against gun control, but they don't impact our society as much as people think they do.
>inb4 "hurr durr muh burgers and 2nd amendment" accusations
4. Yes, but I've never killed an animal. I tagged along to get the experience of roughing it. I like camping a lot. An old friend of mine and his grizzly-bear father were always the ones doing the shooting. I HAVE unsuccessfully bow hunted before.
5. Yep. I like them in the way a person likes the mechanics of a car. They're interesting bits of machinery.
>>707726085
Yes
1
More
Yes
No
>>707729635
Yeah, I know how big a pain in the ass it is. It's also a pain in the ass that because of how armed our population is, our police are paramilitary groups. Gun violence is out of control. The likelihood of the US being invaded is super low. It's much more likely that you'll get shot by a trigger happy cop who's scared shitless you MIGHT have a firearm, and overreacts when you go for your wallet.
>>707726609
Agree with this Anon on #3
>>707726085
yes
2
less
no
OH YEAH
>>707729292
The is no "gun show loop hole." Gun shows are run by FFL (federally licensed firearms dealers) and would never sell a firearm needing a background check without one. Some exceptions to background checks are passing firearms within a family and some neighbor to neighbor transfers. A FFL would laugh at you requesting no background check while you were at a gun show. Please go to the gun and knife show and get it out for yourself.
>>707726085
1. yes
2. me, father, uncle
3. much less
4. for years
5. yes
Hell yes.
Most of us.
We have too much gun control.
Yes.
Hell yes!
OP is a 12yo faggot. Believe me.
>>707733328
Look at the number of people murdered in the 20th century. Then look at the number killed by their own government. At least 10* as many were killed by their own governments. The right to keep and bear arms is not about duck hunting.
Yes
Literally every one
Restrict access of guns from certain people, don't restrict the guns themselves
Yes
Yes
>>707726085
Yes
Everyone
Unsure
Nope
Yes
>>707726085
yes
like 2-3 people
I think background checks should be required
no, i like shooting targets
yes
>>707735666
BACKGROUND CHECK ARE REQUIRED YOU DUMBFUCK
>>707726085
From Finland
1. Yes, we trained shooting during my compulsory military service, also previously I learned how to shoot a shotgun
2. My father and my grandfather
3. I think in Finland we might have some room to increase our guncontrol, however it's already way more strict than american system or so I have heard.
4. Yes. I've been on moose hunting trip, I was young and didn't carry a gun though.
5. Maybe for hunting purpose, I'd not purchase gun as an means of self-defence
>>707726085
Yes
Almost all the men old enough to buy one
Same..stricter gun control won't inhibit the ability for criminals to get guns, and will mostly affect legal gun owners.
Been hunting but not on a trip
Yes. Thinking of a Taurus judge or a home defense shotgun
>>707735820
i know... thats just my opinion
couldnt think of anything else to say
>>707728902
Explain to me how you can use your cock to bring down an animal or a home invader.
Retard.
>>707726085
1) yes
2) several. now fuck off it's none of your business.
3) the intent of the 2nd amendment was to not allow the government to over power the people in terms of arms. i'm all for restricting who can own a gun, convicts and immigrants can fuck off. law abiding natural born citizens should have no restrictions.
4) yes
5) yes
*for your comment at the top about never having drawn a gun. i hope you don't end up in that situation. but i've had to both draw one on another person, and i've had to stand up to someone with one when i didn't have one and wouldn't have used one anyway.
both situations suck. i've never had to fire on anyone. but i feel like i would, if given a reason. every situation is unique. you can't solve personal protection issues with govt regulation.
1. I've never personally fired a gun (but I want to).
2. I have a grandfather from Indiana who's a member of the NRA, and an uncle who got a handgun for his birthday a year ago (he owns 3, I think).
3. Gun control could use some improvements, but not to keep them out of the hands of law-abiding citizens (the Assault Weapons Ban was a crock of shit).
4. No. I'm not of the legal age to buy one (16 yr. betafag). But I'd like to hunt.
5. Is that an honest question? You bet your ass I do!
If someone who wants to take our right to protect ourselves away, I would not be able to by the time I'm old enough. Also, just because a gun looks scary doesn't make it deadlier. It's just a fact.
Yes
0
Less
No
Yes
>>707726085
1. Yes.
2. One.
3. More
4. Yes.
5. Yes. A .357 revolver for fun and camping in bear country.
>>707726085
1 No
2 Just my grandmother (Yes im serious)
3 a little bit more
4 I'm not a faggot so no
5 Yee boi
>>707728995
>most civilians are unfit to carry firearms in public
As long as were on the topic -most police officers- due to poor skills and training, are unfit to carry firearms in public.
>>707736515
>I'm not a faggot that can provide for myself when all other options are exhausted
1. Yes
2. Depends. Neither my wife or I have one, but if you factor in siblings/parents etc., there are many in my family.
3. I think current gun control measures should be properly enforced before we decide we need any more legislation.
4. Yes.
5. Who knows? Don't have one now because no need. But if I move somewhere that feels less safe, I might.
1. Yes.
2. Me, and my father.
3. Less.
4. Yes.
5. Yes, I plan to become a collector.
1 - yes
2 - yes. one brother owns a gun but hides it from his wife, another openly owns a couple and the third has an arsenal that his wife and kids all shoot.
3-I'm OK with universal background checks but that's it.
4 - no
5 - I think so.
>>707726085
Yes
6
More
Yes
Yes
>>707733328
and why is it so insanely low? And that is also insanely low, nigs just nig around and claim shit that isnt true ie. Din du nuffin
1-no
2-1 (only counting direct family like brothers and parents)
3-Honestly it's fine where it is
4-yeah but I stayed fishing while my father tryed to shoot something that we could eat(fun times tbh we eat fish that day)
5-yes a pistol and an ak for protection
One
More
Yes
Yes
I don't currently own a gun but I have owned many. I quit drinking and taking pills - but when I was using drugs I figured out to sell them before something bad happened.
I've been hunting plenty of times- rabbit, deer, alligator, dove and quail.
Also offshore fishing - carry a gun in case catch a shark or if way off shore like over 100 miles carry a gun onboard in case pirates (in Caribbean)
I like to target shoot at tin cans and also shoot turtles in my family's fishing pond because they eat the fish
Favorite guns:
.357 Magnun - super loud but will go through anything
.44 Special - easy to shoot, not too loud and has bigtime knock down power
you can shoot a deer (or intruder) with either one and they will die fast
>>707733328
Gun violence isn't out of control. Criminals are out of control. We're letting criminals get away with far too much and they know it. Crack down on the criminals and your violence of all sorts will go down.
>>707728995
>2016
>shotgun for home defense
Shiggy diggy
>>707726085
1 yes
2 not sure but most
3 significantly less (am canada fag)
4 yes
5 yes
>>707726085
1) An air rifle probably doesn't count, so that would be a big fat NO.
2) My dad used to own a pistol he kept from the war but he surrendered it before we all moved out of country.
3) I feel that the amount of guns in my country is perfectly fine. As for America...
4) Nope.
5) Hell naw.
t. Civilised balkanite europoor.
1. Yes
2. 1 (not counting antique firearms)
3. I'd like to be able to buy assault type weapons (Canadian) but I am content with most aspects of control here. Making guns 'difficult' for people to purchase on a whim isn't a bad thing IMO.
4. No. Personally killing animals isn't really my thing.
5. Yes
>>707726085
1. Yes
2. 2-3
3. well, that's a difficult question. actually, there are places in the world, where they should be less, and there are places where they shoulde be more
4. Nope
5. Yes
>>707727466
Dumbass
>>707726085
Australian here
Yes
A few
Australia? Same or less
Not officially
Yes
