What is heavier? 5 tons of metal or 5 tons of paper?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
What is heavier?
5 tons of metal or 5 tons of paper?
Your stupidity at asking the question.
>>705510294
/thread
It is not a matter of which is heavier but a matter of the weight being concentrated into one mass. Which will fall faster dropped from 40 stories up? Will the paper be packed together, will the metal be scraps or one lump of it? Specifics are key here.
The paper because you have to carry the weight of what has been done to those poor trees
>>705510294
your mum
>>705510294
My dick
>>705510294
5 tons are 5 tons :)
>>705510294
They are both 5tons
>>705510294
never heard of heavy paper xD
Metal is lighter than paper so the metal
>>705510693
Obvious trick question... its the paper
>>705510294
It depends on the humidity.
>>705510294
>>705510294
>>705510515
>being this retarded.
5 tons are 5 tons you retard...
feathers
It depends. What planet is this on?
>>705510294
It's metal you dumbass.
>>705510294
depends on what type of metal it is
>>705510294
5 tons of ice because its cubed
/thread
>>705510294
In vacuum, paper is way lighter than metal, idiots.
Look, you're all getting confused because OP asked such a simple question and you're trying to find deeper meaning in it.
PAPER
WEIGHS
LESS
THAN
METAL
Don't let OP or any of these trolls trick you. USE COMMON SENSE.
>>705511244
Can't /thread your own post shithammer
https://youtu.be/N3bEh-PEk1g
Fuc of op
Neither, Skrillex bass is the answer you're looking for
>>705511619
why can't you just laugh?
>>705511106
/thread
>>705510294
It depends what kind of metal
The material is the most important thing, not the weight.
5 tons of air weigh nothing.
5 tons of water weigh more, because it's liquid.
5 tons of metal weigh even more, because it's a solid.
>>705511804
\this\
paper because you'll be carrying the weight of all those dead trees too xD
>>705510294
5th law of density... metal is more dense than paper so answer is paper
The paper because it can soak water and get heavier.
ITT idiots that don't know metal weighs more than paper
>>705511804
but don't forget the atmospheric pressure affects the relative weight of materials by different amounts.
A kilogram of steel because steel is heavier than feathers
>>705510294
My Pennis
/thread
>>705510522
Isn't that a Dane Cook joke or something?
>>705512118
false 5 tons of feathers is the heaviest thing on earth
>>705511244
you can't /thread your own post
the fuck man.
>>705510294
5 tonnes of both
>>705512117
Atmospheric pressure only works in the atmosphere. The name says it.
Here, on Earth, there is no pressure of anything.
Don't try to mislead OP because he's a faggot.
>>705511920
Nice
>>705511091
in a vacuum everything falls at the same speed
>implying were in a vacuum
>>705510294
Paper,
Moisture in the air,
Surface area combined with atmospheric pressure,
White color under pressure from sunlight since it's shape is distributed across the curvature of the earth the center of mass is closer to the earth's core. Get fucked idiots.
>>705510953
Loophole! Well done anon.
>>705512784
no you retard the paper would still weight 5 tons, there would just be less pieces of it.
>>705510294
Steel, because steel is heavier than feathers.
>>705510294
Depends on gravity, the density and if they fall in a hypothetical perfect vacuum.
>>705510294
the correct question is which is more dense.
to which, the answer is OP is the densest of them all.
Nothing is heavier then metal, only faggots listen to paper.
>>705510294
What is tonnier? metal tons of 5 or of tons 5 paper?
>>705512693
*we're.
>>705512191
Did you mean penis or pennies?
>>705512895
Doesn't matter, the weight of the paper is constantly fluctuating more than the metal. Humidity fluctuates, atmospheric pressure fluctuates, sunlight fluctuates and the earths core fluctuates. The metal can also lose mass by rusting away.
>>705513514
Your mom fluctuates.
>>705510294
You mean tonnes not "tons"
>>705511002
Faggot.
Depends.
Are they African or European tons of paper?
>>705513514
Irrelevant, the weight of each substance is fixed in the opening statement, so the fluctuations would necessarily be at a constant net flux of zero.
>>705510294
Yes
>>705513800
And what kind of twine are you using too.
>>705510294
OP's mom is heavier.
Depending on the dimensions, and whether the material stated acts upon free fall.
If it were 5 tonnes, of 1 sheet papers, they'd likely float in each of their own direction, causing floating scatter.
The metal on the other hand, if a solid object, rather than say, 5 tonnes of nails, would free fall faster, as would the nails compared to the sheets of papers.
However, if it were nails, and one solid block of 5 tonne paper, the paper would fall faster, no?
Is the metal moving 400mph into a paper wall?
>>705510294
No u
>>705510294
you're mum
/thread
:^)
>>705510456
/thread
>>705512916
Not on the moon tho...
>>705510693
/thread
>>705511905
well memed man
>>705511500
>PAPER
>WEIGHS
>LESS
>THAN
>METAL
>Don't let OP or any of these trolls trick you. USE COMMON SENSE.
Really? Last I checked they were both 5 tons...
>>705510294
5 tons of sauce
Diamond is the hardest metal.
>>705511500
>USE COMMON SENSE
>>705513678
No, he means "tons" the non retard way to spell it.
But it is missing some info here 4 example: Here on Earth or on Jupiter, or on the surface of Sun, at what distance from the surface, in a vacuum or not
>>705510294
A better question would be:
Which would be destroyed faster by one magma?
>>705512495
Yeah guys atmospheric pressure only works in the atmosphere, not in vast empty void that surrounds the earth apparently.
>>705510294
The 5 tons of faggot who is OP.
>>705515639
>>705510294
This question is simple to answer. Paper naturally would be have more weight (or less) regarding which shit is written on it. Would you print all the 4chan miracles and bad rumours on this 5 tons, the scale would implode.
>>705515532
Ha ha ha. Fuckwit.
>>705515944
how much is 1 magma though?
>>705515945
your 5 tons
>>705515944
Didn't we already settle that question???
>>705515944
Yeah, but how much is one magma?
>>705510294
depends what kind of metal is it, if its steel beams then maybe jet fuel can melt it
>>705510294
your mother duh
>>705516024
one.
how hard is that to understand?
>>705510294
Metal. By far the heaviest music genre.
>>705515944
Goddammit, here we go again.
I kekt, OP.
>>705516127
i cant quantify that.. give me a relation! how much is 1 magma?
>>705516069
One magma is one magma. It's less than two magma, and more than zero magma.
>>705510294
Dude, you are sooooo wise and prudent. Let me fuck you in your ass, I'm so gayish this moment
>>705516215
Did you not graduate grade school? ONE. One MAGMA. If you need a relation, it's half of TWO MAGMAS.
>>705516313
>>705516402
but how much is one?
>>705516215
Look you just take two magma and split it in half. Then you have 1 magma
>>705516402
Oh, we pluralize it with an s? I thought it was without an s.
>>705516518
In a continuum of numbers it would fall between 0 and 2.
>>705516602
No. Only if one magma was twice it's size can you keep it without an s.
>>705516602
No the plural form is just magma
>>705511500
>USE COMMON SENSE.
I guess you mean use COMIC SANS
>>705516702
PLURAL? No one said we had more than one magma. Stick to the problem please.
>>705515944
>>705516024
>>705516069
>>705516127
>>705516215
>>705516313
>>705516402
>>705516518
>>705516557
>>705516602
>>705516612
>>705516700
>>705516702
>>705516806
You guys are real fags. Like, literally
>>705516806
I'm just saying you don't pluralize the magma with an S. It's just magma.
>>705516518
>>705516702
noun, plural magmas, magmata [mag-muh-tuh] (Show IPA)
1.
Geology. molten material beneath or within the earth's crust, from which igneous rock is formed.
2.
any crude mixture of finely divided mineral or organic matter.
3.
Chemistry, Pharmacology. a paste composed of solid and liquid matter.
>>705510294
In fact, 5 tons of metal will have a minor archimedes effect compared to 5 tons of paper.
So the mass (in grams, kilograms) will be the same, but metal will be heavier (in Newtons)
>>705516983
Someone doesn't like fun
>>705517076
>So the mass (in grams, kilograms) will be the same, but metal will be heavier (in Newtons)
What if it was in New York instead of Newtons?
>>705510294
Is the paper wet tho
>>705515944
[b]Obvious, It depends on how well magma is conducting electricity[/b]
>>705517222
checked
>>705517222
it doesnt fucking matter, 5 tons are 5 tons you retard
>>705517111
it was fun the first time mr.trips
>>705517166
Then you must read the book "How to tell jokes for dummies"
>>705510294
Well when we consider that metal has a greater density than paper, it has a better gravitational field (very small tho, but still existant). We can iclude magnetic attraction to this, since our pretty earth has its magnetic field, tho depending on the area we would weight it it may even be smaller. Also since we are comparing weight and not mass, we could argue that no matter what medium the metal and paper is, paper will have higher buyoancy because of the larger volume, thus reducing the epherical weight eg. The vertical force on the surface of our planet. So i'm gonna have to go with metal on this one. Diference in about 10^(-100). But metal.
Get
Fucked
>>705510294
I'm no good at math or physics stuff but I know that poop, memes and ms paint simpsons porn is pretty funny.
>>705517315
>Then you must read the book "How to tell jokes for dummies"
This is serious stuff.
As paper will experience more lift, it would weigh less.
How much dirt is in a hundred foot deep hole, with a 50 foot radius?
Technically seen the metal is heavier.
They have the same mass, but due to the higher volume of the feathers the top ones are further away from the ground and thus get affected by gravity a little little little bit less, but it's obvious that they don't weigh the same due to this effect although they have the same mass
>>705517929
/thread
>>705511804
You're fucking stupid.
Let's assume the temp is -230C, in which air(mostly oxygen and nitrogen) will be in a solid state.
>>705517929
none
>>705517462
>>705518177
Shit I just wanted to post something similar.
Yeah if we are pedantic there is a slight difference in their weight even though they have the same mass
>>705510294
The real question is "Just how gay can OP get"
>>705517929
Yeah, but how much is one hole?
>>705518607
Usually about $200. But if it's her back hole, $300.
>>705518766
I usually pay one magma.
>>705518849
Is this a ylyl thread in disguise? Because I lost.
>>705518849
Unless she weighs as much as 5 tons of metal weighs. Then I pay less.
>>705518177
Irrelevant.
It was stated that the weight was equal, thus, they are both equally heavy. If the volume or mass isn't equal doesn't matter.
>>705510294
There both the same but do u have moar anon
>>705510294
oh this joke, they are both the same bc 5 tons
They're both the same relative weight, though center of gravity is a different story.
At the end of the day it's the paper because while the metal is heavy the paper has the weight of the colossal environmental damage it's production causes
ECO REVOLUTION COMRADES!
>>705519163
>>705518960
so about 1/4 white?
>>705510294
If you made a kite out of the paper then the metal is heavier. If you make a plane out the metal then the paper is heaver. But we all know scissors win...
>>705510294
Beautiful bait
>>705519099
>It was stated that the weight was equal
No it wasn't. They said 5 tons. Now, if the metal was in North American tins, that would be 2,000 pounds. But if the paper is uk UK tons, then it's 2,240 pounds.
Therefore, 5 tons of paper weigh more than 5 tons of metal.
/thread
>>705519204
>metal come from nowhere and does no environment damage
stay naive fags
>>705519402
>North American tons
>>705510294
dat ass
>>705519586
Looks like it weighs a ton.
>>705519639
UK or North American?
>>705510294
5 tonnes of yer mom on mah dick, eyuh
No srsly, her weight is becoming a issue when I'm suffocating in your birth hole
>>705519951
Try to keep up. We already solved that.
The question now is how much you'd pay to shoot one magma into a hooker with an ass that weighted a ton.
>>705510294
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH0hikcwjIA
>>705520279
four
I'd pay four
>>705520572
how much is that in white?
>>705510294
What a stupid question
>>705510294
higher res lazy fags
>>705510522
lololol
5 tons of paper will take much more space, and more space=bigger air resistance so if we would throw both of them from high, paper will fall last, so we could say that 5 tons of paper weigh more
>>705519402
What if it's the other way around?
Also, why the fuck would OP be talking about different tons?
>>705520629
>>705510294
What is gayer op or a faggot
>>705521091
ah thanks fam
Is the paper wet?
>>705510294
IS THIS PARTICULAR METAL THE HARDEST METAL KNOWN TO MAN OR NOT
>>705519451
less.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/e2/c7/24/e2c724d12f43be3deb45cb9cdd71a892.jpg
>>705520902
yeah ... that's not how weight is measured. Also: vacuum. Moron.
>>705510294
Metal of course it's way more heavy than paper
>>705521014
Look at it this way...
Guy in the US has 5 tons of metal. Calls his friend up in the UK and says "Dude, I need paper. I'll trade 5 tons of your paper for 5 tons of my metal."
Doesn't matter if it's the other way around, someone is getting screwed.
>>705511711
because its not funny
>>705515532
>>705510294
your mom
>>705518377
You so right. Dubs of truth.
depends strictly on gravity.
the ton is an unit of mass.
5 tons of paper on earth weight more than 5 tons of metal on the moon. and the other way around.
>>705510294
They are both 5 tons so one is not heavier than the other. However, paper is naturally more lighter than metal so there would be more of it than metal to meet the same mass.
