One last time
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
One last time
110
>>703933930
1 + 5 + 20 = fuck off with your pathetic problem
101
102
>>703933930
31'5
>>703933930
102
>>703934287
Try again
>>703933930
105
>>703934287
Note the two yellow flowers in row 3, one in the 4th
41
>>703934148
/thread
>>703934360
Oops, wrong. 101
>>703934395
You sure about that?
>>703934390
nvm i'm retarded
81
It's 102
84 because one of the flowers leafs is missing
>>703934107
> + = x
>>703934531
nvm Im stupid its 81
3x = 60
x = 20
20 + 2y = 30
2y = 10
y = 5
5 - 2z = 3
2 = 2z
1 = z
1 + 20 * 5 = 101 (PEMDAS)
/thread
>>703933930
ANother PENTAS thread hidden in the simplest puzzle on /b/.
Welcome to shitpost land ladies and gents.
The answer is 98.
>>703934207
how
>>703934531
but where does the 4 come from?
>>703933930
It's 84
>>703933930
110 retards
>>703933930
x+x+x=60/3=20
20+y+y=30-20=10/2=5
5-z=3-5=2
1+20*4=81
81
>>703933930
101
20 + 20 + 20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5 - (1+1) = 3
1 + (20 * 5) =
84 innit?
>>703934663
Blue flower in the last row has 4 petals..
>>703933930
102
its 81 if the the missing petal means the blue flower is 4.
damn there are some retards on /b/
>>703934616
Just noticed that blue flower on last line missing a petal
1 + 20 * 4 = 81
assuming each petal = 1
>>703934722
>20 + 20 + 20 = 60
>20 + 5 + 5 = 30
>5 - (1+1) = 3
>1 + (20 * 4) =
the last blue flower has one less petal...
>>703934645
Wait, 101 and I'm retarded.
Stupid two flowers.
>>703934784
kek
>>703934863
Ahh, nice catch.
>>703934653
1 + 20 x 5
1 + 100
101
>>703934769
Oh come on who made these fucking symbols lol.
If I saw this on a test I would start a revolt against the teacher. But here it's just OP is a fag.
>>703934722
This is much less a math problem than it is a "Ha,got you" bullshit joke.It's 81...
>>703933930
question mark
>>703934375
Thanks, I missed that, so 101.
you could also say the blue one with 4 petals is an undefined number
>>703934769
clever girl
104 faggots
red = 20
blue = 5
yellow = 4
then pemdas
>>703935112
>>703933930
Different flowers you faggots
>>703935085
Did you notice how the last blue flower look though?
>>703935052
its meant to test how your brain intakes visual images as well as the math equation itself. Judging by the answers in this thread there isnt much hope for /b/tards
82
>>703935202
i'd stick with 81 anyways lol
>>703933930
keep in mind there are several "right" answers as the final problem is not written correctly...in before "that's the joke"
red = 20
blue = 5
yelow=1
1+20x(4/5 x 5) = 81
>>703934531
nicely done
Threeve
>>703935017
Yep. This.
84, 4x1=1 when you're aut
>>703935568
I may be acoustic but my dik get hard when i seez pussy
i've seen this test in various variations now and all i can say is that the easiest way
>>703935401
the yellow can't be 1 if the blue is 5 faggot
>>703935677
why?
>>703933930
Manual was unclear.My dick stuck into the fan
>>703933930
Sage
>>703935677
Two flowers anon its a trap dont go in there!
>>703933930
105
>>703935833
but it's so tempting
>>703933930
yellow flower + red flower * blue flower = 102
>>703935809
dat paint
obviously 26 you fucking faggots
>>703935677
5-2y=3
y=1
38.5
103 bitches
If dubs this is now a dubs thread.
>>703934148
blind fag
>>703936245
>s 09/14/16(Wed)19:29:51 No.703936245▶
>103 bitches
You mean 102 bitch
>>703933930
105 idiots
▲
▲ ▲
its 101
red=20
blue=5
yellow=1
20+20+20=60
20+5+5=30
5-2(two yellow flowers)=3
1+20*5
pemdas
20*5=100
100+1=101
>>703936803
It's 81 the last blue is 4 it has 4 pedals
-19
81 you faggots
>>703933930
All the answers are bullshit.
It's impossible.
You can't KNOW what a single yellow flower is equal to.
You can't KNOW what a blue flower with 4 petals is equal to.
You are PRESUMING.
And that is not how mathematics works faggots.
>>703933930
Niggers
The answer is 102
20+20+20 = 60
20+5+5 = 30
5-2 = 3
2+20*5 = 102
20 + 20 + 20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5 - 2 x 1 = 3
1 + 20 x (5 - 1) = 81
>>703937793
Mate, if two yellow flowers are subtracted from a blue flower, which is equal to five, to make three, then one yellow flower must be equal to one. And four fifths of five, is four.
>>703937850
/thread
Although mathematics does presume plenty. We call them axioms.
>>703938588
>Implying symbols have to play by your logic
>>703937850
>not noticing that the second question contained two yellow flowers
>not noticing that the last question had a blue flower with only four petals
Wew.
>>703938588
Two flowers is a symbol
8 is just two zeros on top of one another so by your logic two times zero is 8.
That doesn't sound right somehow.
>>703938821
These "symbols" are substitutes to the actual value. The flowers could be equivalent to x, or any other arbitrary replacement you give it.
>>703938979
The two flowers would be equivalent to 2x, they aren't one symbol on their own.
ITS 84 YOU ALL FUCKING MOROOOOOOOONS
>>703938979
kekd
>>703939022
Cmon OP. The final question has a symbol that does not appear in the first two examples. Therefore it could be anything.
>>703933930
>>703939231
You have pretty much defined conjecture with that statement.
>>703933930
105 now can we do the sex?
>>703939238
Imagine you have a pie, if one fifth of the pie was removed, you'd have four fifths remaining. You could apply the same logic here.
>>703939479
derp, i made a typo, was supposed to be =3 on 3rd line, lol
>>703939650
But the thing here is; five minus x is three. So x must be two, if split in half, which is one flower, we'd get one.
>>703940263
You're acting like I don't understand the logic,but I do, it's just wrong.
It's conjecture, you don't have the information to back it up, just your opinion.
1-0-jew
>>703939780
9000 hours in paint
>>703940577
The picture shows that these symbols must be replacements to the actual values, using letters would be the same. The only other way I could see the yellow flowers being different is if it represented x times x, seeing how there's no plus sign. In this case we'd just have to find the square root of two to find the value of each yellow flower.
>>703940771
I don't get it.
>>703941119
The blue flour has 4 and 5 petals in the last question. If they valued 4 petal flowers over 5 petal flowers, then it would change the answer. You are assuming they decrease in value based on the amount of pedals. Why?
It goes like follows. The first row of red flowers are identical, so we may presume each holds equal value. This means we can divide 60 by 3, which is 20. In the second row the initial value is 20. Same applies to the 2 identical blue flowers, which both have an equal value, which if added up equates to 10. 10 divided by 2 is 5. Meaning the sum is 20 plus 5 plus 5. The third row has a value of 5, of which a double yellow flower symbol. This symbol must equate to 2 for 5 minus x is 3 to be true. From there on, it is a matter of interpretation. You either consider one yellow flower to be half of the double yellow flower, for which 2 divided by 2 is 1. In which 1 plus 20 times 5 equals 101. But you can also consider a single yellow flower to be of unknown value as the value hasn't been proven yet. Because why else would you stack them if previous lines simply add them up one by one. So the final answer could also be undetermined. Now I hope even you monkeys understand where you are wrong.
>>703941233
It's 180,001. Are you retarded?
>>703941119
Why couldn't it be division?
Or exponential?
Logarithmic function?
Trigonometric function?
I could go on
You can't know. You're presuming. You have a theory and its a very good one but it's still a theory so any answer you give is at best an educated guess.
>>703941480
Don't forget the blue flower on the last line is not identical to the blue flowers shown above
>>703933930
81?
>>703941323
What you're saying is correct, but it would be more logical think that less on the flower means the value is lower. Less = less.
Also, why are we suddenly talking about the blue flower? Not that I mind.
>>703933930
102
>>703941905
Probably, personally I'm on the you can't know what the blue flowers value is bandwagon.
>>703941548
I meant I had no idea what you were asking of me.
>>703941999
This also is seen in real life as four leaf clovers are vastly more sought after than 3 leafed clovers. More pedals, more value.
>>703941999
Oh trips, for the first time ever I will say you have a lot to learn. If you think most things in this world are based on logic then you have a tough future ahead of you.
The blue flower is more at assumption then the yellow, since the yellow flower is identical in both equation except the doubled aspect. Although again, I wouldn't put to much faith in the, 'things make sense" bag when it comes to symbols and pretty much anything touched by a person.
Order of operations...
flower with four petals (4) x flower worth (20) + flower worth (1)
81 is the correct answer.
>>703942298
61*
Impossible to tell. We have A, B, and C but D and E are unable to be solved for
>>703933930
101 faggots, the movie
>>703934207
No its not.
81
101. PEMDAS you faggots.
>>703941707
This is why we have mathematical symbols, to clearly show what the operation is. The two flowers though could either be multiplied or added. Though, either way it is an educated guess, you're correct.
>>703934769
>>703934784
>>703934531
that shit makes no sense red flower doesn't have 20 petals, that's one stupid conclussion what really matters is the color and the trick was the double yellow flower, fucking idiots.
>>703942326
I'm actually curious, could you give me an example of some things that are not based on logic?
I'm relatively good at math, but what the actual fuck am I looking at?
>>703943087
The flowers are just arbitrary symbols used to replace the actual values.
>>703933930
It's 1+20x4 = 81. But only if it is:
a+a+a=60
a+5b+5b=30
5b-2c= 3
1c+a*4c=?
Otherwise its not solveable
>>703943148
Trumps candidacy, Hillary's candidacy, religion, ect.
>>703943374
then blue flower with 4 petals could be any fucking number... not just 4
>>703942884
>>703943511
From what you've written, b = c.
>>703933930
12 * 5 = 60.
>>703933930
a + a + a = 60
60 / 3 = 20
20 + b + b = 30
b + b = 10
b = 5
5 - c = 3
5 - 3 = 2
2 + 20 * 5
20 * 5 = 100
2 + 100 = 102
>>703943148
Well in a way everything, Math and Science, since they do make assumptions, axioms, self evident truths.
Do you have an example of something that's made only logically? In my definition, logic comes from minds, which is flawed from the beginning.
>>703943799
>3x=60
X IS 10 HURR DURR!
Also you dont know order of operations
>>703943374
with that logic I could say red flower on the bottom is 10 because it's kinda smaller...
red ones are 20
blue ones are 5
yellow ones are 1
1+20*5= 101
>>703943942
Stupid asshole that didn't see that blue minus 2 YELLOWS, means every yellow is one
>>703944044
dubbldubs
>>703943788
Yes from what I have written B=C=1, if blue flower with 4 leaves is new variable its not solveable. Same with 2 yellow flowers. Easy math for someone studying computer science
60/3 is 20
Red is 20
20+X2=30
Blue has to be 5
5-2 is 3
Yellow has to be 2
2+20x5=102
Multiply 20x5 first because bidmass and add 2 last. Simples.
1+10*4=41
>>703943942
The last blue flowers has only 4 leaves so its not the same variable.
Holy fucking shit, I sucked at math and all but this shit is easy as fuck. Not sure if you are all baiting but the result is 26.
Thats because 20*5=25+1=26.
>>703943557
*etc
Sorry, that's a little pet peeve of mine.
For both candidates, they believe that they can win, by following the logic that there's going to be people on their side. In the case of religion, they follow the logic of some greater power creating everything, and I see it as people trying to go one step before the Big Bang, People who refuse that things such as evolution and such never happened, are just plain stupid. But as long as there's doubt, logic can be used to reach different conclusions.
>>703941905
>>703942298
>>703942345
Just kys faggots
>>703943942
>>703944344
Thanks for not being fucking retards
>>703944456
> 20*5
> 25
>>703933930
101
>>703944456
>20*=25
kek
>>703944456
How the fuck did you manage to fuck up that bad
>>703944456
No you just still suck at math
>>703944555
Ohh i get it, so its just retarded then.
Also chekd
Holy fucking shit, I sucked at math and all but this shit is easy as fuck. Not sure if you are all baiting but the result is 26.
Thats because 20*5=100+1=101.
>>703944622
Yeah I fucked up kek. I was too fucking triggered so here is the correct version.
>>703944560
They are different flowers, look more closelier
81.6, reconsider your mathematical abilities.
>>703944748
Its 102 -_-
Could you not fucking figure out 5-X=3
>>703944003
The assumptions, axioms, and self evident truths are made by following evidence given, and using logic to piece them together. Sure, it could be flawed, but if they manage to make some step to the next, as long as it's soundly relatable, then some logic was used.
>>703934061
This.
Thread end.
>>703944748
101* fucked up this one too in the first row. Well fuck it, not deleting this.
>>703944783
kekd. But assumptions m8. Were talking philosophy now.
>>703944560
You are retarted.
20 * 3 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5 - 2 = 3
2 + 20 * 4 = 22 * 4 = 88
>>703944748
>this shit is easy as fuck
>gives wrong answer
>>703944748
Either its 81 or its not solveable, you suffer dunning-kruger effect
>>703944783
how the fuck did you get 81.6? are you retarded
>>703944917
Look at the picture closely again. In the 3rd row you can see 2 yellow flowers, but in the last one its just one.
Answer is last 2 digits
>>703933930
Unsolvable
Fuck off with your guaranteed replies.
>>703945024
well lead me trough the calculations. I guess I am retarded after all.
>>703944956
Kek, are you serious?
ITT bunch of murricans too stupid for basic math
>>703944062
So if I drew an x differently each time during the problem I'm solving, that means each one is a different value?
>>703945053
what?? Where did you get 81
>>703944748
You got that right this time, all those 81 faggots are assuming without any evidence that the blue flower with 4 petals mean 4...
>>703945053
it is 101 or unknow
>>703944956
You dont even know what the blue flower with the different petals represents fuckwipe, if you got handed this as a question in an exam paper you would have to probably write down the error as part of the question on the paper.
Faggot.
>>703944919
>Self evident truths
>Logic
Pick one.
Nah I'm kidding, sorta, I mean I agree with you that science and math are true, but their base is in philosophy not logic. It's a somewhat contradictory stance, but so is life. But axioms have no evidence before them, that's what makes them axioms.
But no amount of correlation of evidence proves causation.
>>703945341
Either every other symbol is a new variable and its not solveable
or
Amount of blue flower leaves is amount of variable and amount of yellow flower is amount of variable.
>>703944917
You dumbass its 81 kys
It's 105.
I've abandon PEDMAS years ago because it's not a good tool to read mathematic sentences in the real world.
LCR is a better way to simplify it.
>>703944560
dont listen these faggot, 102 is correct.
The image itself is fucked up, implying the image wanted to change the letters to different flowser specie and color; yep 102 is correct.
My brain hurts now
>>703933930
not this horseshit again...
>>703945064
Ohh damn i stand corrected so i see why you'd answer that way, but still how an i supposed to know if the two flowers represents addition, or multiplication, it would be an error.
>>703945352
Refer to errors if this was an exam paper.
26.
>>703945349
No 5 leave blue flower cannot be the same like 4 leave blue flower. It just can be 81, in this case if blue flower variable would be C it would be 5c and 4c.
>>703933930
101 anyone with another answer is a fucking idiot
>>703945882
102. who care about the petals and not 100% the same. when we write A B C D, we don't make a 100% replica of each letter every time we write them. We're not printer. so the 102 is the fucking answer to this shit
This image is all a fucking bait.
This is a fucking hilarious thread
>>703945940
It's either
a+a+a=60
a+5b+5b=30
5b-2c=3
c+a*4c=?
Or its
a+a+a=60
a+b+b=30
b-2c=3
c+a*d=?
2nd one is not solveable
>>703946086
>Who cares about variables not 100% being the same
> Thats not how mathematics works
>>703945882
Then it doesn't have an answer. It can't be 81 because you can't just assume that new symbol means 4 and with that logic the "2 yellow flowers" symbol is two and a lone yellow symbol is unknown.
>>703946530
fucking this.
>>703946530
20
5
2
20*5 +2
>>703933930
It is not really possible to tell what single yellow flower means
we only know double yellow flower is 2
>>703945536
You honestly can't be that fucking stupid.
>>703946638
those aren't variables those are symbols
8=VIII
>>703946703
How you know the value of variable d? Its variable d not c
>>703935677
Retard confirmed
>>703933930
101 baitshit
>>703946680
I wrote both, the 2nd one is only written mathematics of what I said. Either assume countable differences are amount of variable or assume different graphic means different variable.
>>703934480
This, 81
>>703946530
It could also be...
a+a+a=60
a+b+b=30
b-c=3
*d+a*e=?
>>703946899
Wat? 5/10 bait
>>703934061
/thread
>>703947293
Yes you are right but I was too lazy ro write too because it's not solveable either
>>703935112
mmm so it means that it's an other variable , the exact answer is : unsolved.
>>703947318
2/10 bait
>Assumptions
>Math
Pick one
>>703946530
>>703947293
Only right answer, anyone else is an idiot
>>703947353
Are you baiting? * (or x) has advantage before +
>>703933930
38.5
>>703933930
a + a + a = 60
3a = 60 (divide both sides by 3)
a = 20
a + b + b = 30
20 + 2b = 30 (substract 20 from both sides)
2b = 10 (divide both sides by 2)
b = 5
b - c = 3
5 - c = 3 (substract 5 from both sides)
-c = -2 (multiply both sides by -1)
c = 2
c + a * b =
2 + 20 * 5 =
2 + 100 =
102
what is basic algebra?
>>703948060
No shit faggot, we were discussing if it's either 4 or unknown.
>>703933930
Red = 20.
Blue = 5.
Yellow = 2.
2 (Yellow) + 20 (Red) x 5 (Blue) = 110
88.5
2eazy
>>703948237
you blind?
>>703948060
I study bachelor of science, trust me you are obviously not getting what we talk about
>>703948347
Oh shit, I forgot order of operations. 102 *
>>703948549
where do you think did I make a mistake?
>>703948347
>>703948237
Too much people don't get what this thread is about and think they are not stupid
>>703948347
>yellow actually is 1 b/c the third line has a group of yellows
>ignoring that you are saying 2 + 100=110
>>703948750
For example last is D + a * e
>>703948851
>>703933930
>>703948347
This guy has it like 90% right.
PEMDAS, guys...
Parenthesis, Exponential, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction.
Shows the proper order to perform operations in. So last one is 2+20x5=?
Which is 2+100=102
81 fucking retardeds
>>703949266
You didn't see that blue flower in fourth line has only 4 leaves too
>>703949475
Read the fucking solutions. Pretending your solution is right doesnt makes it right
why am i on this thread?
>>703949933
The answer to life, the universe and everything can be found in this thread.
Protip it's shitposting
>>703933930
207
>>703933930
3x=60
x=20
20+2y=30
2y=10
y=5
5-z=3
-z=-2
z=2
2+20*5=?
102=?
>>703934148
Anon got it right first
27 holy shit
>>703933930
Cute. The last blue flower is missing a petal.
Before, the blue flowers can only equal 5.
The pair of yellows subtracted from a normal blue is 3, meaning each yellow is 1.
1+10x4=?
If we're doing pemdas left to right in order, it's 41.
its 84, for all the mentally handicapped
red(20) + red(20) + red(20) = 60
red(20) + 5pblue(5) + 5pblue(5) = 30
5pblue(5) - 2yellow(2) = 3
1yellow(1) + red(20) x 4pblue(4) = 84
1 + 20 = 21 x 4 = 84
>>703951512
>red(20) + red(20) + red(20) = 60
JK its 41 multiply b4 adding
>>703933930
20x5=100
100+ 1 = 101
101
>>703952173
Im wrong that blue flower has three pedals. Fuuuu
>>703934061
Dumbass
>>703933930
