GOD DAMNIT NO! NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!
>>698828473
An all lady heist movie actually sounds pretty interesting, kinda disappointing they put the oceans 11 name on it
>>698828473
Why so angry?
>>698828473
After the runaway success of Ghostbusters this was inevitable.
>>698828583
Exactly. If they wanted to do this whole female badass empowerment bullshit, they could've done something brand new.
Not ruin the original Ocean's movies.
>>698828583
that's exactly the problem hollywood doesn't seem to get. Why not make a new heist movie under a new IP? NOOO they have to use a fucking known name....
>>698828583
Yeah. The ocean movies were pretty good. Gonna fuck it up like ghostbusters
>>698828473
>all female oceans 11 movie
YES
YES YES YES
YEEAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>698828473
>>698828583
>>698828636
>>698828653
>>698828681
>>698828705
>>698828741
>>698828473
Id consider it. As long as it's an original plot line it might be good. If it's just a rehash of oceans 11 with chicks then I'll skip it.
>>698828741
ghostbusters was great dude wtf
>>698828741
Nobody says it's going to suck just because it's a female remake. Ghostbusters sucked because it was bad, not because it had an all-female cast
Plus it's gonna be a ripoff not a remake
>>698828681
How are the oceans movies ruined?
>>698828872
Who is this?
>>698828473
Anna Hathaway would probably be good but does Rihanna have any acting chops
I'm not so instantly against all-female remakes necessarily it just has to be directed and written well.
>>698828986
katy perry and orlando bloom
>>698828473
>Awkwafina
what the hell kind of bullshit is this
>>698828473
I like Anne Hathaway
>rihanna
>awkwafina
confirmed for feminist bullshit
>>698828473
God damnit, I hope we'll at least get to see some hot outfits and nude cenes.
>>698828473
>Awkwafina
>movie is called Oceans something
lol this gotta be a hoax. noone calls their fucking daughter Awkwafina.
>>698828473
you're aware oceans eleven was a remake, right?
Anyways we already have a proper trilogy. I could care less what happenens after that. The reason people were upset about the female ghostbusters reboot is because we never got a proper 3rd movie. Had gotten that. then the reboot. I bet it wouldn't have been such a big deal.
1st world ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''problems''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>>698829601
>If there's anyone in the world living in worse or unfortunate conditions, we shouldn't be allowed to have any complaints
Fuck off. You can't live your life by how everyone else lives.
>>698828681
dude, you can't ruin those piece of shit movies. and hte new ones already ruined the originals. fuck off.
>>698828473
Why do you let shit like this bother you tho
Ignore and move on
Stop leaking your autism everywhere
>>698828473
I'm torn here. I like heist movies, but I hate pandering movies.
If they want to lose a lot of money for producing a shit-tier movie, why not? They'll learn it the hard way.
Fuck off shill.
Nobody cares about an Oceans 11 remake.
>>698828473
If they wanna make something empowering, they should remake a classic with all gay black men, not women.
>>698828583
This. I jave no problem with movies with a primarily female cast, per se; it just seems incredibly lazy how they just replace all the characters from an eatablished franchise with women rather than creating a new IP for it
There's a John Mulaney joke in here somewhere...
>>698828872
Stop posting this you solsticefag
>>698831140
You came from reddit didn't you?
>>698829548
Holy shit and here I thought that bojack pop dolphins name was stupid and made up.
> Full of women
> It's just two hours everyone talking behind each others back and gossiping
/flop/
>>698828473
The fuck is your problem? This, I have no problem with, it stands on its own 2 feet, might be good might be shit, but there you go. Now, if they were remaking oceans eleven with an all female cast, shit script and crappy jokes, that would be a different matter.
>>698828473
When are we going to have an all-male charly's angel spinoff ? And a male tomb raider spinoff ?
>>698829548
They called their daughter Nora. And she decided later to go by the name of Awkwafina, like many other artist who use stage name
Woah, who says Ghostbusters was a success?
It's tanking spectacularly.
>>698832254
thanks i dub yu
ackwardfina
Kek,this shit gonna flop harder than Ghostbusters.
>>698832005
>male tomb raider
That's Uncharted, retard. I do like the idea of an all male Charlie's Angels
>>698832508
ghostbusters was actually pretty fucking funny. i enjoyed it.
>>698828473
What the hell is an "Awkwafina"?
>>698832562
i was talking about movies
>>698832709
asian rapper/talk show host, i know her because she's friend with asa akira whose twitter used to be funny
>>698828872
>mfw shillary in the background
>>698828705
They have to piggyback off an existing IP because they know an all female ocean's like movie will be fucking trash. How are you going to replace a classy Clooney with females? Females just can't pull that off, so the character will be rewritten, i.e not an ocean's film.
>>698832723
There's an Uncharted movie in the works dude. That's why I said that.
>>698833085
that will just throw Melissa McCarthy at it. Movies she is in strangely seem to do well.
>>698832723
yeah, like Tomb Raider
>>698829548
How can you be this fucking stupid?
>>698833085
>thinks clooney was in the first oceans 11
this is the problem, really. faggots like you.
As long as they're scarcely clad, i don't see the problem
>>698830242
Fuck off. The remade 11,12,&13 Clooney movies are great. Badass soundtracks and movies with class. Go back to watching dog fart shit humor movies. I challenge you to actually watch the movies and follow the plots and say it's a shitty movie series.
God control your fucking woman America .
>>698833603
>thinks anyone gives a fuck about the old ass version
>same thing with the original The Mechanic
Few old movies age well anon
>>698828705
You don't get it.
Woman Ocean's 11 will make about 200mil.
Burglar ladies would make zero.
>>698833718
i've seen them all and they're mediocre at best
>>698833603
btw sinatra was a drunk and dean was a fag
>>698833976
yeah no klidding that's why they're remaking these clooney pieces of shit too
>>698834078
yeah so?
>>698828473
Wonder if there's gonna be anal gaping scenes.
>>698834082
Remakes keep the movie industry alive
>>698833718
Oceans 13 was fucking shite mate
>>698833375
They do well in the TV talk show and entertainment show circuit. Which gives the impression of success.
As for revenue, they either completely tank or barely break even.
>>698834196
agreed, looking forward to the newest one with all babes in it. could be fun.
i just hope we get to a point where we can comfortably put in a mix.
>>698828473
Why can't English and American newspapers write a good headline? Why doesn't it say "Anne Hathaway and Rihanna join bla bla bla"?
>>698834223
Oceans 13 was amazing.
12 on the otherhand..
>>698828879
Get. The. Fuck. Out. Now.
>>698828473
the oceans movies are shit, babby tier heist movies for babbies
>>698834316
Honestly i don't mind seeing some of my favorite movies remade. But there are also some i would fucking RAGE if anyone tried to touch them.
It would probably bother me if I liked the other Ocean movies. I thought they were mediocre at best. This will probably just be the same.
>>698829040
Didn't you see Ri-Ri in the Battleship movie?
>>698834016
Problem is it will only make 200mil if they spend 300mil on marketing.
aka Roastbusters Syndrome.
>>698834479
Lol straight trash
>>698833603
>thinks this female only film is going to mimic the original
nigger
Can someone please explain to me how building on an original idea with a totally separate movie 'ruins' it?
>>698834464
Right. If the Ocean's movies are shitty heist movies, name one that's great? What, you gonna say Italian Job or some shit?
>>698834799
Inside Man
this thread is pure cancer. /b/ is really dying
>>698833603
The original was just an ego trip for the rat pack. It wasn't a quality movie and they didn't try to make it one.
>>698834799
resevoir dogs, time bandits, lock stock, die hard, a fish called wanda was better for fuck's sake
>>698834878
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0454848/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0240772/?ref_=nv_sr_1
>>698835064
Resevoir Dogs and Inside Man were great movies, Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels is a great cult movie but has nothing held to the remade Ocean's movies.
>>698834887
this place has been dead since 2008
nothing to do but grab a stick and help beat the dead horse
>>698835066
>0.2
>Imdb
Cmon anon
I doubt this movie will get nearly as much backlash as the Ghostbusters reboot. Though if its gonna have Anne Hathaway they should just make a Catwoman movie instead , especially since Warner Bros is making it.
>>698835182
>Oldfag implying
>>698828473
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ccTJYwF4zQ
>>698834887
why? because it's not another trap or ylyl thread?
>>698828473
>MFW all the salty neckbeards in this thread
They should make all-female remakes of more movies so all the losers kill themselves and stop draining the nations' resources.
>>698835232
First of all, they aren't even similar movies, really.
Ocean's has a rock solid cast. Soundtrack. Lots of little hidden easter eggs. Again, Inside Man is a good movie, it's not Ocean's 11.
>>698835418
I agree with that.
Will women start fucking our ass with dildos in the future because muh equality?
>>698835689
Why do anons have to make everything gay? Is this a gay image board now?
>>698835394
You first fuccboi.
>>698835870
Neckbeard detected.
How does it feel, being so angry and knowing you can't do anything about it?
>>698835689
>start fucking our ass with dildos in the future
>implying pegging hasnt been a thing for years
This doesn't work because when a bunch of classy dudes rip off a casino, they're still cool. When women do it they're gold digging whores.
>>698836112
Kek you right fam you right
>>698828879
>>698836105
Still not the norm
>>698828473
FUCK NO!!!
How much money does Hollywood have to lose before it learns that we do NOT want sexism rammed down our throats?!
>>698836324
Yet
>>698836373
>>698828473
Predictions:
It will flop.
Blame my soggy knees.
>>698831364
Not at all. Just lurking through the threads here. Also, big Mulaney fan.
>>698828473
>>698836373
>>698836391
What is this shit? the chinese communist party poisoning american media?
>>698828681
Man, if you want women represented in games they should make their own games. If you want women represented in corporations they should make their own corporations. If you want women represented in politics they should make their own countries.
But they don't, because conquering nature is a creator's concern and parasites conquer creators instead.
>>698828473
?
Who gives a fuck? Oceans 11 was always shit anyway.
>>698832646
>>698834751
If I want a horse to carry me places or drive a plow or do any other sort of work that I can't because I'm weak, I have to break it first. That doesn't entail being nice to it, that entails roughing it about and giving it shit for every hoof it puts out of line until it's so self-hating, so mentally exhausted and afraid of fucking up and upsetting me and incurring my overwhelming, unreasonable wrath, that it just agrees to obey me.
Humans can be broken and worked in a very similar way, which is the problem people have with social justice, even social justice at the moderate scale. When we see people, institutes, or other icons we love, submitting to social justice goals and agendas, it hurts, because we're seeing someone/thing that we once respected getting browbeaten into being someone's little bitch. How would you feel if your awesome war veteran grand-dad revealed that every day he takes it up the ass from Tyrone in an alley on the way to get his pack of smokes because now he's too frail to fight back?
Seeing people shoehorning women into male movies to satisfy hordes of angry drivers is a sign that our society takes its orders from those who are interested in working it for personal gain. It's a sign that every day we are becoming more and more like broken horses.
>>698833085
They could save it by going the comedy route and giving one of the girls a prosthetic chin to achieve maximum swagger.
Hollywood would never do that though because they're fuckers with an agenda.
>>698828473
>>698837698
>silly cuckold fantasies
you're easily seen right through faggot
>>698836605
More like the remnants of the good ol' KGB.
Look into some of their files that were irked in the 90's. This is a long game that's been going since the 50's.
Seen the draft they're using. I'll sum it up for you.
>look at my tits can i have those keys?
>look at my tits and not over there where the other girl is getting the keys
>look at my tits can I have those keys?
>ur fat
>I'ma suck ur dicks don't look over there
>>698831841
well it doesn't "stand on its own 2 feet" if it uses the Ocean's name
>>698828872
Hillary in the background looks like Smough from Dark Souls
>>698828473
Oh come on. Oceans lived on charisma. That's just a trait women don't have, I'm sorry. I don't want to be mean, but there are gendered rolls that can't be filled by the opposite sex. Same is true the other way around, of course. Imagine a male Harley Quinn - that shit would just suck and be cringy as hell.
Apart from that, I'm already pissed because of the absolute Mary Sue bullshit we'll be seeing. It will not only be "woman can do XYZ JUST AS GOOD as the men", it will be "women can't fail without exception".
I loved Oceans, this is making me sad.
>>698834316
Wimminz can't be badass.
>>698828849
Name one positive thing about that idea.
>>698837698
This is a fantastic breakdown of it all.
>>698829601
Okay, so nevermind the bad route we're going down, let's ruin everything in silence until we're the worst place, then rebuild it, right?
>>698828473
We should stop this from happening
>>698830286
The issue is the politization of EVERYTHING. Identity politics has infested literally any form of entertainment, government, literature, education, hell even science and that's a bad thing and need to be opposed on every occasion.
>>698828473
>implying oceans eleven is some sacred thing and isn't utter boring generic hollywood shit to begin with
>>698838852
I was wondering when you'd show up, Warner Bros.
No, we're not doing your marketing for you.
>>698833375
They're only getting good media coverage and score well with critics. She doesn't have an audience and neither do her movies. It's just the infestation of media by the SJW mindset in action.
>>698838867
This shit right here.
>>698838867
>hell even science
Dude scientific research in the employ of governments, agendas & partys got us to the moon, split the atom, gave us jet power, renewable energies, Super glue, successful surgery techniques, etc.
Shut the fuck up dude. This is nothing new.
>>698828916
Actually if you scroll that's what all these virgin faggots are saying
>>698828681
The Ocean's movies aren't ruined, they're still here.
It's just sad that these "empowered women" had to use an established series to boost the popularity of a film that no one would go see otherwise.
>>698828473
This was announced ages ago. And like Ghostbusters 2016, it will suck dick.
>>698831718
ikr
>>698839274
Prove we went to the moon. Prove it right now
>>698837698
You realize that you're adding the social justice aspect to this situation, right?
Why can't they just make a movie that traditionally starred men with an all female cast with there being no implication of social justice?
Alternatively... Even if you are right about the social justice aspect which again I assert that you are not, why does watching what we say so as not to offend people, and deliberately offering roles in movies of the dominating demographic to underrepresented demographics offend you so much? Why does fairness and a new hatred of insensitive assholes offend anybody?
>>698839274
You don't know what I am talking about, I guess.
Google identity politics. It's the seperation of people into groups creating the need for collectivist and authoritarian measures to represent en empower or silence and marginalize said groups. It's inherently anti-individualistic and as a consequence not based on merit. You can't have scientific progress outside of a meritocracy, because you need the best ones for the job and that's something identity politics strictly opposes, because it's more concerned with group membership of the people than with their talents and value in their fields. The result are quotas, wasted resources on incapable human beings, misattribution of problems to percentages of representation, rather than a lack of expertize and a free pass for incompetence. If you love science, oppose identity politics. This isn't a government issue (yet - since governments are getting more and more invested in identity politics).
>>698839788
Make me
>>698839788
What standard of evidence do you require?
>>698839894
I can't argue with with that
>>698828473
If it's just a spin-off of the original idea, who cares. But if it's a straight up remake, that's just retarded
>>698840002
Proof. Hard proof. Law and order SVU standard proof
>>698839859
You ever thought about the fact that maybe the large influx of women scientists is probably because women are indeed capable of science, and like men, their skillsets are varied and many?
Its very easy for you to point out an incident where a seemingly less qualified woman got a position in a department or institution over a man with 'better credential's
But you dont know the whole story. I'd need 2 posts just to list the variables involved, and unless you were there and know the whole situation, you can't make an informed decision.
So any argument you base your decisions on regarding the incident/s is invalid. This is very basic critical thinking dude.
>>698840002
I might even need to go myself
>>698839894
this nigga wins
>>698840233
That's not specific enough. I guess pictures and videos would suffice?
>>698840369
Hell no nigga if that sufficed I wouldn't be asking
>>698840478
That's what I though.
By your standard of evidence, could you prove to me that Norway exists?
>>698828879
I respect your shit opinion. But you're wrong.
>>698828916
It's all-female cast was the source of it's dishonesty, though. It was made to take an all-male thing and make it all-female, that itself didn't enough drive or creativity to make an actual movie. Frankly Oceans is even more difficult, it took George Clooney to remake that movie and it barely scraped by at being considered cooler than the old one. If they can't do Ghostbusters well they can't do this.
>>698839035
This. And it's not like it even worked, Ghostbusters viral marketing didn't save it either. Movies still involve having an actual idea and the cynical people are wrong, they've always been wrong and that's why bullshit like Spy Kids 2: Electric Boogaloo go straight to DVD. The absolute dumbest movie you could do well with is a summer horror or disaster flick and those fall back on their expensive special effects.
So once they figure out SJW isn't a money cheat code this kind of thing is probably over with
>>698840589
Are you willing to take a long flight with me? Cus I'm willing to take a flight with you to your place. Think yours would cost more tho
This is singlehandedly the most retarded fad Hollywood has ever come up with.
>>698840830
You cannot be serious about that
>>698840246
>basic critical thinking
You misspelled "whitewashing".
>>698840763
So there exists no evidence strong enough to make you believe that the moon landing happened, then. The only way to prove the existence of something is to see it with your own eyes, no?
Do you believe that atoms are real? How about evolution? It's obviously a progress way too slow to be thoroughly observed within a lifetime. What's your opinion on thequantum superposition? All a hoax?
>>698828473
At least they have a (mostly) good cast but... WHY?!
This movie would actually have potential if it wasn't made simply to erase history of male characters in already made movies.
Isn't it quite ironic that the movie is about a heist on a casino and the kikes are also displaying the behavior of a gambling addict.
>Ghostbusters was an attempt at gender baiting much like a gambler would put down their chips.
>It bombs and din't get back anywhere near as much money as they invested in nor as positive reaction as they wanted much like how a gambler would lose money.
>Now what would happen when a gambling addict loses money? They try again expecting it to be better the next time when in reality the chances are against them.
I thought they would have at least learned from Ghostbusters.
>>698841201
here comes santa claus
here comes santa claus
right down santa claus
laaaaaaannnne
>>698828473
>Ocean's Harem
>>698841486
who is playing brad pitt?
who is playing george clooney?
>>698828583
You mean like "Set it Off"?
>>698842221
The obvious choice is Rosie O'Donnell, and Roseanne Barr
>>698842221
I like your logic. That's top notch analytical thinking.
Consider them not caring about the money.
Flop movies can serve agendas too.
This is likely a form of female confidence building.
I suspect we're moving slowly toward male female equality and these retarded knockoff movies are attempted stepping stones toward that goal.
>>698840246
It's less their abilities and more their interests. The average woman is not willing to work as hard as the average man. The average woman is less interested in competition than the average man. The average woman is far less likely to be interested in STEM than the average man. This is all mirrored in the workforce and there is nothing wrong with that. Everyone gets to decide what they want to be and do. If you're a competitive woman interested in mathematics, then go for it. Evidently those women do. It just happens that they aren't as many as people want it - but they can't decide for the women to pursuit a career they have no interest in pursuing. Don't you agree on that?
Now let's set up a hypothetical research facility. We need 50 mathematicians. The best ones we can get. There is a 25 to 1 ratio of men and women that are both qualified and interested. We assume an even distribution among the "talent scale" that means every 25th applicant, as sorted by descending skill, is a woman. We are to fill a quota and that is 50% of the hired mathematicians are to be women. Let's make it a best case scenario and let the best applicant be a woman.
Now let's break it down:
>follow up post
>>698843533
The first 25 employees are 24 men and 1 woman of the very best. Now you're left with another 25 vacant positions. 24 of these have to be filled with women. Naturally you take the next best candidate you can get. It's the 26th best candidate and also female. You still have one position that can be filled with a man. The 27th best applicant is male, so you choose him. For the first 27 positions you have indeed chosen the best 27 candidates. The other positions HAVE to be filled with women. That means the 28th position is filled with the next best woman. It's the 51st best candidate. 29th position, filled with the 76th best candidate and so on until the 50th position is filled with the 576th best candidate. You're left with about two thirds of really qualified employees and a third of really not that much qualified employees. To hire the 576th best candidate (female) you had to not hire the 28th best qualified candidate. Neither the 29th best qualified candidate and so on.
Now you're creating three problems: 1 you discriminate against male applicants based on their gender. 2 You have a workforce that is artificially made weak. 3 You create an environment where no employee can be sure that a woman got the job because of her merit and qualification, however you can be sure that all the men did. You're creating an environment with an explicit and objectively correct bias against women. Congratulations.
>>698842221
That brings up another good point. These reboots prove that feminists these days don't care about equality for women and more about hate for men. It would be much better for both men and women if they create a new film that can go down in history that stars women because either way when people think of Ghostbusters or Oceans 11 they'll still think of the originals. Instead modern feminists hate men so much that they'd much rather sacrifice that to erase men from film history.
Other things feminists do that indicate they don't care about women is speak against anyone who encourages them to take up self defense or martial arts because "men should be taught not to rape anyway" and wanting to bring in people with an extremely misogynistic culture into civilized countries.
>>698839805
Well, let's see, with that as a motivation they managed to flop something as popular as Ghostbusters. It's a hollow, unartistic motivation that will produce hollow, unartistic works. The fact SJW political aspirations and obsessions are clouding the fair entry of women and minorities into society and it's art is exactly why SJW are a toxic shitcock. When you do things for those reasons it makes people suspect you're doing other things for those reasons.
Last question marks you as a troll, but okay - an "ism" can't be ended by playing into it. Just like you can't make good art out of an agenda you can't create fairness from unfairness, you can't just forcefully balance everything out as if society were an equation.
>>698840246
The influx has already been measured and compared to models, a model in which his assertion is incorrect would not be a functional model. I'm sure lots more women would have come into science eventually but the speed and carelessness of it's happening makes it obvious that it's being forced. This force is also why it's second rate, if it had happened naturally the women would actually be happy to be there and they would take rational, satisfying pathways. Instead they're living their lives for politics, to force balance onto something - it's an empty thing to live for and will generate empty results.
You can't just force the world to be fair overnight, sorry. We aren't computers. If you try to cram people's feelings into little boxes you'll just a get a lot of leaky boxes. I don't know how much more you people have to fail at everything and be hated by an increasingly large section of society. Till everyone hates you, I guess? Should be less than 10 years at this rate.
Spoilers, you SJW people lose the culture war. You were always going to lose the culture war because you're the one who's actually careless, selfish and cruel.
>>698828681
>He forgot the shit sequels
It was already dead.
Just more proof Hollywood thinks the only good place for a woman is a place a man has already been and conquered
>>698844215
This exactly.
The people who make these movies could have made something new.
Instead they chose to re-make something.
I'd like to know why.
>>698838625
22 boobs
>>698844555
Also.
>>698844738
Well, only 16, but at least that's a point. A weak one, but fair enough.
>>698844738
Under8ted post...
Will laugh when the preview comes out and "22 boobs" pops into my head.
>>698843390
>That's top notch analytical thinking.
thanks bro, you're sweet today.
>>698845511
aww now kiss him on his dick
>>698828473
Fuck it, all female Saving Private Ryan next.
>>698843572
Good post
>>698845673
settle down pervert. your shitty attitude is why no one compliments you. your jealousy is wildly unattractive too.
>>698845775
stop complimenting everyone! you're ruining our moment.
>>698828473
LMAO
>>698836655
check em faggots. double dubs indicate truth
>>698843390
>gyno-supremacist propaganda is moving towards male female equality
You're in for a shock in the coming years.
>>698843533
>>698843572
See you've just completely disregarded my post and continued to use your views in your hypothetical and pretty autistic argument, because it uses pre-conceived notions of how you think people are based on sex.
And it really doesn't matter what you think, because you're just an amateur Armchair scientist with a diploma from Autismo University.
Get some life experience and learn that statistical analysis based on something that isn't quantifiable (Human aptitude for science between sexes) is completely null and void.
>I'm sure lots more women would have come into science eventually but the speed and carelessness of it's happening makes it obvious that it's being forced. This force is also why it's second rate, if it had happened naturally the women would actually be happy to be there and they would take rational, satisfying pathways. Instead they're living their lives for politics, to force balance onto something - it's an empty thing to live for and will generate empty results.
There have been a large chunk of women scientists for over 200 years. I hate to use examples, but the entire team responsible for mapping stars based on Colorimetry was women, A woman discovered hydrogen's majority as an element in stars, A woman's algorithms allowed men to commit missions to landing on the moon, A woman discovered and linked radiation to the EM spectrum.
I'll go on because I still think you're both completely ignorant of the subject.. Women in Antiquity were a massive part of the Medical science industry, many holding extremely important roles. Merit-ptah was a head surgeon in ancient Egypt, and the earliest recorded Woman in science at 2700 BC.
In the Dark ages up until the Renaissance, Scientific discovery made a sharp decline followed by a slow but steady recovery. Women in this time peroid weren't generally allowed to study in universities, but there are cases of over a dozen universities across Europe. Post 1
>>698828473
>All Female Oceans Eleven spinoff
>All Female
But that's a literally good thing
Reason: No sausage fest
>>698845966
go back to your time traveler role playing thread, faggot.
>>698834479
Yes and not only the movie was shit, but so was her performance.
And just what the fuck is Awkwafina ?
>>698843390
>
I suspect we're moving slowly toward male female equality and these retarded knockoff movies are attempted stepping stones toward that goal.
>Implying we're not already equal in the West.
Yes both men and women face different discrimination but we are more or less already equal. We should worry more about how women are treated in Islamic countries.
>>698846002
boooring pasta is booooring
>>698846117
what
>>698846172
I fucked up the greentext there.
>>698846133
it's aquafina water with a splash of purple drank.
>>698828473
surely this won't fail like ghostbusters
>>698846220
say what again.
>>698845966
The nearest years will seem that way.
In the long run they want to fuse men and women so we stand a better chance in space.
We may have to choose something similar to the hermaphrodite as our best means of surpassing extinction.
>>698828473
>all female
>oceans 8
>titular
Its like men trolling women trolling men.
ITT: Awkward autists who get triggered by seeing an all-female starring cast because they can't even stand next to a female IRL without having an anxiety attack
>>698846002
That allowed women full access to its libraries and its lectures. Convents and nunneries encouraged Women to learn to read and write were the only stable sources of education for women in this time period, but men were similarly met with problems of education.
In the field of medicine previously stated, Women have been on par with men almost for their prevalence and studies in the field.
Up until the 18th century, women were frequently allowed and thrived in the scientific community. At this point, it was believed that women were mentally inferior to men, and that stagnated women's contributions to science. Only after the suffragettes have women had equal opportunities to men. Albeit in less numbers, women have been contributing to science for as long as men. If you really believe the recent influx is forced, then you need to get off tumblr. Like men, women are told what they can and cant do by society, but there are many many people who just dont listen and do what they want to.
And a sizable portion of women want to go into STEM fields. If you cant deal with that, then thats your problem. If you're scared of women in STEM fields fucking things up, maybe you should re assess whats going on in your life, because men and women are equally clumsy and do stupid shit in equal amounts.
Scientific ingenuity isn't something you can measure of quantify; the only solution is to give everyone a fair chance.
>>698846542
fuck off with your time traveler bullshit!
lol
>>698828916
>ripoff and remake are different things
Its gonna be the exact same story shillio
>>698846750
yawn
>>698828473
>jakwandakawafina
SHEEEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIT
>>698846378
what again.
>>698847160
dance monkey!
>>698846542
>convincing feminists who have been brainwashed for generations to revile the penis that they should embrace having one to become unisex
Good luck.
>>698833636
Breastfeeding creeper confirmed
>>698846754
My bad.
Won't tell them.
Seems so obvious tho.
Thought they knew...
Will keep between us.
Three pointing back at you btw.
>>698828473
Soo uh if they're so indecent of men then why do my they come up with an original idea? Not steal someone else's and call it their own
>>698847414
the chicken burrito rings twice at 730 and again with the banana.
check your ass for cracks or the new dawn will rain potatoes.
>>698837698
Great comment. I'm sure half of your responses will be hummus flavored.
>>698828473
I thought they would have learned the lesson after ghost busters.
>>698847319
Our grandparents had CIA profiles made for them.
Today we embrace the profile and called it Facebook.
I'd call it a plan, but still, thanks for the luck.
>>698838333
>everything will hinge on the fact they are women
Amazing sherlock. Seriously though, I know you're right even if you're lying about the demo
>>698833497
made you reply
>>698848048
no that was me. i am the puppet master!
>>698828473
Who cares. It's going to be a dumb film and it's going to bomb. Just don't watch it.
>>698840830
I think its about equal with scary movie, funny movie, hero movie types. However the humor is pretty esoteric so it comes off offensive on the surface. Just like the pandering movies the writing is terrible but the sauce is there for the right audience.
>>698840596
Anyone with an opinion like that shouldn't be respected, I don't know what you're talking about.
>>698848267
>misogynist detected
The year is 2016. It is a time of great innovation and technological advancement. It is also a time of chaos and conspiracy.
>>698843390
>>698843533
>>698843572
>>698843668
>>698843896
Tldr tinfoil circlejerk
>>698848436
Do you remember that fine Christian Sunday evening we watched "The Lobster" together on Skype?
>>698846002
>There have been a large chunk of women scientists for over 200 years [...] Women in this time peroid weren't generally allowed to study in universities, but there are cases of over a dozen universities across Europe.
None of this adresses the points. Probably because you simply discarded them here
>statistical analysis based on something that isn't quantifiable (Human aptitude for science between sexes) is completely null and void
I assume you mean these of my statements
>The average woman is not willing to work as hard as the average man. The average woman is less interested in competition than the average man. The average woman is far less likely to be interested in STEM than the average man.
And, indeed, statistical analyses suggests this and yes that doesn't imply causation. That's why there have been multiple studies on differences in competitiveness between the sexes. I may link this [1] analysis of several different studies to confirm that women are indeed less competitive and this [2] study on career path choices and competitiveness of girls and boys.
I realize that the livetime of a /b/ thread is not enough for you to go through these and come up with a rebuttal or alternative explanation for the observed behaviour, but I'd still strongly advice reading them; especially the second one.
[1] http://web.stanford.edu/~niederle/NV.AnnualReview.Print.pdf
[2]https://web.stanford.edu/~niederle/BNO.QJE.pdf
>>698828473
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHA
We are fucked.
>>698848642
part two:
Now to your points.
>And a sizable portion of women want to go into STEM fields. If you cant deal with that, then thats your problem.
I'm an individualist. I don't care abour group behaviour, I care about individual merit and opportunities, as such I'd be happy with scientists being 100% female. This sizable portion of women should do as they please and enter the competition and that's where my problem is: We're lowering the standards for women and that's a problem. It's creating what I mentioned in my post about quotas as the third consequence.
>If you're scared of women in STEM fields fucking things up, maybe[...]
I'm not. I'm scared of incompetent people fucking up and the result of choosing applicants for their gender, rather than their competence is exactly what will inevitably cause said fuck ups. Why would I want women to keep out of STEM, given the reality that a male quota would have the very same effect? Again, it's about merit, not sex.
>>698847816
You're still asking them to give up their superior protected-class status and to become one of us again.
Not gonna happen.
>>698848505
It's aluminum you autistic asshat.
>>698848718
part three ( sorry for this, I'm too stupid to count words or format properly)
>Scientific ingenuity isn't something you can measure of quantify;...
You can: Compare qualification. If not that, compare results.
>... the only solution is to give everyone a fair chance.
Exactly. At that means turning down applicants regardless of their gender. We want the same thing (equality), but we can't agree on how to achieve it. I'd suggest it's because I want equality of opportunity, while you want equality of outcome, despite claiming the opposite.
I'm sorry for skipping your examples from history, but they have no value in this. Apart from that, none of it was false.
Last issue I take is this:
>Like men, women are told what they can and cant do by society
No, society doesn't tell anyone what they can and can't do. Society (and I usually don't treat it as an entit, but for the sake of discussion, I'll do it this time) establishes standards. Everyone is free to pursuit these standards or not and there is nothing inherently wrong with having standards.
>there are many many people who just dont listen and do what they want to.
So you're admitting that, despite society allegedly holding people back, it can be done? Great, that is empirical evidence that the opportunity is there and nothing needs to be done. Case closed.
>>698848642
>>698848718
No one is reading this drivel.
Save it for your diary.
>>698829040
>Anna Hathaway would probably be good but does Rihanna
I like Hathaway but Rihanna seems like a retarded choice.
>>698828872
> somebody is gonna get schlonged
>>698848940
Name one colored lady actress who's superior to Rhianna.
>not Harambe
>>698848361
Yeah maybe, but it IS going to be a dumb film. Is a trend.
>>698848642
>>698848718
>>698848778
Holy crap you're going to have a brain aneurysm. It's just highbrow satire. Everything dies.
>>698829548
Sextina awkwafina might.
>>698849081
Yeah, just because you hate women doesn't mean you're wrong.
>>698828473
The cast choice seemed good up until Aquafina and Rihanna. I don't get why we need an all anything cast though
>>698849165
this bitch will make you realllll moist.
>>698829548
She's a new york rapper
>>698849321
>I don't get why we need an all anything cast though
get a load of this goy! maybe this will help you understand?
>>698848748
They'll demand it.
We pay money to have tracking devices on us at all times. Social engineers know their craft well.
As soon as it's the thing to do. They'll do it.
I suspect it's taking so long because they have to stifle word of genetics in favor of advancing bio-robotics. Once Bio-robotics is a solid science, we can get started.
>>698848576
No mate, you added roofies to my drink.
>>698849671
that's a pretty serious allegation for such a little lady. pretty sure you're misremembering what happened.
>>698849481
Seen the ads for nationwide life alert services yet? :)
>>698849321
Do you understand now?! Tell me you read through my table and you understand. Do it. I didn't post that so you could fucking ignore me.
>>698850032
Ran away from TV 15 or more years ago.
Glad to say, I have not.
Thanks for the update.
You're a faggot or whatever.
>>698850266
>ran away
that's the most adorable euphemism for going to prison i've ever read.
>>698849890
>retty sure you're misremembering what happened.
Isn't that what roofies do ?
>>698850538
I had a friend who was locked up. He said he watched TV.
TV is a tool used to flash colors at your brain.
If you stop watching it, you'll see a different world.
>>698849071
Kellita Smithas, Halle Berry, Aisha Tyler, Trudy Chain. Quit being retarded.
>>698850226
>being this autistic
>>698850226
This isn't /pol/ you triggered snowflake, calm the fuck down. That image macro is posted a thousand times a day
>>698850780
look at you with all these silly nigger names!
they're all on par with ryhana, not superior. you need to settle down. call off your celebration. remove your tendies from the oven. this isn't over!
>>698849071
>shitposting this hard
>>698850771
Careful there neo.
>>698851018
>That image macro is posted a thousand times a day
the fact that you count and recognize my work really makes this all worthwhile.
>>698851052
Please quit being retarded?
>>698850771
but is it a world worth seeing?
>>698851052
>>698850226
calm down autists. this isn't the shitpost Olympics
>>698851313
>this isn't the shitpost Olympics
then why am i in rio?!
Inb4 aluminum shitstorm
>>698851187
What a TWIST !
>>698851153
I always Am.
>>698828473
what? a remake of Ocean's 11 is gonna ruin your childhood too? fuck off
>>698851274
please stop hurting me.
>>698851305
>wouldn't you rather be blind?
Really?
>>698851313
>/b/
>not the shitposting olympics
>>698851554
reality isn't all it's cracked up to be, brotein shake.
>>698851706
This.
>>698851778
>the ref has called it.
goooaaallllllllll
>>698851741
>having no sensation is better than sensation and the wisdom to use it condotionally
I think you're wrong.
>>698851554
Some people might.
It's an odd choice to be blind. One would have to see first in order to choose.
I wonder how we make those distinctions.
>>698851949
>use it conditionally
you don't just turn it off.
>>698828681
woman lack the creativity to come up with new IP´s
thought this was Frank ocean news at first :/
>>698852195
You sure can. It's called discernment. Or being a sociopath.
Depends on who you talk to.
>>698852551
and then when you realized it wasn't you still decided to post that you thought that it was?
>>698852662
nah, that's just picking and choosing. it's not total disregard.
>>698852058
The definition is relative when you only apply it individually.
Most have been universally convinced they don't make a big picture difference.
Good question, no definitive way to answer. By design, of course.
>>698840002
he is beyond resoning with his mind trapped in preschool.
>this is good news tho as the culturewar will be on fire
its going to be Ghostbusters 2016 on crack
> all the possible tributes in the lineup
i predict good tiems
>>698852786
>picking and choosing
>conditional
You've repeated exactly what I originally stated. If you're trying to say the definition of a sociopath is total disregard...you'd be wrong
Get yer hot sage. Hot sage here!
>>698852273
>lighted hose caddies
Christ they spared no expense on that masterpiece huh?
>>698853055
I knew inside that there's something I didn't know then that I know now.
They forgot on purpose. We remembered with purpose too. Something like an irrational action ,to us, is a moment in time like any other.
Causality might be more nonlinear than it appears to be.
inb4 404
>>698828473
Awkwafina?
>>698853281
no! i'm saying what i think my way, not what you said in my own words. you're trying to turn this into an argument about semantics and that bores me.
>>698828473
soooo ummm....
don't see it?
>>698854661
>if you don't like our movie then don't pay to see it!
brilliant marketing approach.
you sound like a moron who is upset about the new ghostbusters movie. or when they replaced all of the guns in ET with bananas. who cares? find something else to worry about!
>>698829185
A dolphin from BoJack Horseman, as far as I know
>>698854661
Logic is the funniest thing here ever.
>but the bok
>but muh childhod
>but muh butthurt
The internet will argue over anyhting.
We're sopposed to.
>>698854920
this contributes to why these shitty movies flop.
instead of arguing why the film is worth their money, you faggots just tell them to fuck off.
and they do.
