/s/ fur bread
there you go faggot
>>697975125
That's...
...bready
>>697975019
>>697976161
Good shit right here
>>697975019
>cringe thread
ftfy
>>697977525
Who r u?
>>697978213
No one.
>>697978575
I'm gonna dump a little to get the thread properly going.
>>697978575
>>697978575
More.
>>697978575
Dumpin'
Help me, /b/ros.
>>697978575
Count me out.
Coming back later to save all the good images (;
What, faggets broke ns again?
>>697979736
Seems fine to me
>>697979736
NS is fine, but TFF has been fucked for a couple days.
Oh ok. That's good. good.
Still I feel something...
TF the fuckers had broke tf. I knew it. faggets
>>697980256
So how are you, Heaven?
>/s/ fur thread
>no sergals
Let's fix that
>>697978213
He's a small, cringy faggot
>>697981029
Get off my dick.
>>697981174
I will, when you hang yourself... or stop being such a faggot.
>>697980885
Why are we not posting mpre stuff like this?
This is GOD-tier furry porn.
>>697981388
The fact that you're so obsessed with me only makes me want to live longer. I'm flattered that you care so much about me to mention me multiple times a day, every day.
>>697981415
Hey Gerald, how are you?
>>697981539
Greetings Mer Diesel.
>>697981579
Greetings Mer Dash.
Still not dead yet, still having a fever though. that's 6 days now.
>>697981579
I'm just lurking in thread and on the occasion i'm calling you a faggot. Faggot
>>697981741
That isn't Diesel by the way.
Still? Man, I'm sorry to hear that. I hope it goes away soon.
>>697981849
<3
>>697981741
Not Diesel =P
Hey, since you guys belong to the bottom of society, according to society, how fucked up is it really that this gets me off?
>>697981910
Well, fuck, it isn't is it...
I'll live, unfortunately, I really have to go to work tomorrow no matter how AI feel.
>>697982033
Not really fucked up at all. It may make you seem a little weird, but nothing serious.
>>697982104
That sucks. Hopefully it'll be gone before then.
>>697982033
Bottom of society?
Not me.
I am well liked and respected in my community. I contribute greatly to society, I'm fairly important to the defense and well being of both the country and the country's economy.
>>697982033
People get off to worse, even in the fandom itself. Vore, scat, watersports, and gore are prime examples.
>>697982226
As legislation passed in my country has banned loli, and deemed it as child pornography, and it will be punished as such, and zoophilia is also punishable, i can only assume this will be illegal, or somewhat illegal soon.
>>697982528
I doubt something like furry art would become illegal. Even if it wasn't, you need to move out of your country.
>>697982389
If so, applause. Good for you, and for society, I guess. As for what gets one off, would you guys say it's any business of the state?
>>697982410
>>697982656
My country is the top of the world, both economically and socially, progressive as fuck, all that shit, so no plans on bailing anytime soon.
>>697982741
All true.
And , no, it's no business of theirs at all. I already disregard their laws.
>>697982741
No. Let them get off to what they want as long as it doesn't hurt themselves or others.
>>697982741
No, absolutely not. Whatever I do in my home is my business and my business only.
>>697982857
>progressive as fuck
"Progressive" is not a good thing in my mind. But if you want to live in a country with such retarded laws then whatever. That's really fucking stupid, but it's not like I can do anything about it.
>>697982940
How far would you say it has to go until the state has no business with knowing what you're up to? Only wrongdoers need to be worried?>>697983043
>>697983098
I'm not sure what you meant by that.
>>697983087
Progressive as in seperation of church and state, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, etc.
>>697983244
As in; what's the state's business, and what isnt? In your opinion.
>>697983098
>>697983098
Like I said, if you're not hurting yourself, other people, doing other super immoral shit, then that's what they can monitor. The state doesn't need to monitor drawn porn as much as it does CP, rape videos, and things like that.
>>697983098
The state has absolutely no business knowing what I do in my home. The only time it would be acceptable for them to know is if someone is a murderer, rapist, or terrorist. If they're not hurting someone, then it's none of their business.
>>697983337
Is it really free though? Because it sure as fuck doesn't sound like it to me if loli, which isn't even fucking real, is considered child pornography.
>>697983337
Oh, I dont really know, I just know they have no business telling me what I can or cant fuck.
>>697983337
What country we are talking about?
>>697983419
>CP, rape videos, and things like that.
Why would they even need to monitor that? And what is considered "moral" or "immoral"? It's entirely subjective, and it's extremely hypocritical and downright ludicrous that CP is illegal. I'm hurting absolutely no one if I look at pictures or videos of naked children, not that I would. And not to mention the fact that there are secret pedophile rings within the government and Hollywood that you probably don't know about. More pedophiles work for the government than anywhere else.
>>697983496
I'm unsure as to the actual legal definitions of loli is, as technological advances move way faster than the laws can keep up with, but I think it's considered as a warning sign. Loli = drawn children in way meant to cause sexual arousal.
One may believe some people could take it further.
>>697983875
Norway
>>697984148
Either way, that's fucking retarded. I don't even think real CP should be illegal, let alone a fucking drawing.
>>697984148
That isn't the point of making child pornography illegal, though. Children are in no position to take a logical stance at an adult wanting to see their naked body.
Also, if there is no market for something, there would be noone crerating content for a market noone is interested in.
>>697984297
And of course, one could argue that Paedophilia is a sexual orientation like any other, but children are in no way capable of resisting, nore understanding the implications that come with nudity, pornography, sexuality, etc.
Again, >no market, no content.
>>697984297
Damage has already been done with the videos anyway.
>>697984148
>One may believe some people could take it further.
There are two theories. One is that loli "quenches" the thirst for real children, the other one is that it makes it stronger.
>>697984568
Bullshit they aren't. I'm so sick of that being used an argument. I was looking at porn at 10 and masturbating at 11, and knew good and fucking well what sex was. If a child doesn't want to be touched then they can show that. The argument that children can't consent is ridiculous. How many stories have you heard of young children doing sexual things with each other? Probably a lot, and they do it because they enjoy it, i.e. consent.
>>697985009
>not capable of resisting
Key sentence.
>>697981029
>>697981388
>>697981849
What do you gain out of pretending to be me
>>697985009
As much as I hate you and your stupid opinions, you're right on this one. Adults like to think children are some pure little creatures that have no idea what genitals are. But in reality, most males start masturbating at around 10-12.
>>697984351
Pedophilia is a mental illness whatever if it's a draw
>>697984069
You're asking stupid questions. You may think that you're not hurting anyone by consuming the porn, but then you don't remember who made it. CP is composed of minors, who don't even have the mental capacity to choose. Even if it's just "naked pictures of children" doesn't make it okay. Now there's a difference in purpose for some pictures. For example, someone literally fucking a minor is different than just a naked or half naked minor. Of course, the first one would need to be taken down, since there's a potential to hurt the children, and there's still the fact that they don't have the mental capacity to consent and think ahead. Secret pedophile rings do need to be taken down, but it's also a difficulty there because they're hard to track.
But, really, the point of all of this is that if anyone is hurt in it, it's not okay. It's not a thing of just "monitoring porn" it's a thing of "making sure no one gets hurt, killed, etc." That's really all the state should worry about when it comes to pornography at all, instead of making laws that outlaw trivial things like loli or shota, which are just pictures drawn by an artist and have no consequence in real life.
>>697985009
>The argument that children can't consent is ridiculous. How many stories have you heard of young children doing sexual things with each other? Probably a lot, and they do it because they enjoy it, i.e. consent.
Your definition of consent is different from Genuine Consent, which is a legal term.
You have to be mature enough to understand the full implication in order to have consent.
Kids don't know what things like STD's or pregnancy really entail. They can't weigh the risk and make an informed decision on whether or not they consent to the act.
>>697984148
>norway
norway is an have one of the best social and education system of the world
>>697985605
Indeed.
Social security, welfare systems, market socialism (Maynard Keynes), and of course, the nature.
>>697985789
Where in Norway do you live?
>>697984957
Personally, I don't think it's damaging at all unless they're literally being raped. That said, who would it be hurting to watch it? Sure as fuck not the viewer, who it's obviously targeted towards, so who gives a shit?
>>697985112
By that logic, that means that small women shouldn't be allowed to have sex with strong men because they're incapable of resisting. You completely missed what I was saying: many children absolutely know what sex is because it's a huge part of human nature. It's a bonding experience, and humans are very inquisitive. Almost all children begin experimenting sexually at young ages.
>>697985217
Thank you.
>>697985519
>who don't even have the mental capacity to choose
I'm stopped reading that because that is 100% wrong. That is fucking retarded, and I'm sick of people trying to act like kids are fucking brain-dead sacks of meat who can't think. They absolutely have the capacity to choose.
>>697985568
>>Kids don't know what things like STD's or pregnancy really entail. They can't weigh the risk and make an informed decision on whether or not they consent to the act.
Bullshit they don't. Again, this is going back to everyone thinking that kids are completely brain-dead. I knew what STD's and pregnancy were about when I was very young, and so do many kids.
>>697986017
>I'm stopped reading that
*I stopped reading there
>>697985937
East. Somewhat near Oslo.
There's so much more to talk about other than CP. Do yall have to be revolving around that right now? Pic not related.
>>697986017
Yeah no, I guess I missed out on that part. Most pedophiles aren't sexually active with children, and the majority that are, do it with care. The only reason braindead fucks like the guy you're arguing with hates pedophiles is because most people think they're all vicious child-raping predators that do nothing but think of ways to kidnap and rape kids, because that's all you ever hear about.
>>697986017
We're not talking about you, or "many kids"
This is a fucking law here. We can't make it subjective or half-assed.
You have to have a solid number to put down. There are way too many children out there, regardless of whatever country you're in, to assess on a case-by-case basis on whether or not they can genuinely consent.
>>697986372
Alright. Sure, let's switch the topic.
Politics? Religion?
Best furry thread in a long time, this is.
>>697985170
What? I don't care about you. I just want this faggot to commit suicide.
>>697986372
Very relevant picture.
>>697983506
I am the scunt here
>>697986572
It's like a panda version of the uncle from Avatar is fucking a panda version of the kid from Jackie Chan.
>>697986438
>This is a fucking law here.
That's literally what we're talking about though. Just because something is a law right now doesn't mean it should be. Just like how your precious american constitution didn't mean for you fucks to carry hand guns in todays day and age. Back when it was written, you had guns that took 10 minutes to reload.
Things change, education is better, children know better.
>>697986594
>>697986665
>>697986718
>>697986721
Why in the fuckety fuck is 4chan all about hijacking threads?
Fuck off.
Create your own shitty thread instead of breaking ours.
>>697986372
Because I'm sick and tired of all the hypocrisy that goes on regarding CP and pedophilia.
>>697986438
Exactly. It's everyone's twisted perception because of absurd laws which are based on religion.
>>697986438
>We can't make it subjective or half-assed.
Right, because that doesn't happen already. And I'm not some special case where I happen to be one of the only kids who knew about this stuff when I was young. Again, kids aren't fucking retarded. They're very inquisitive, and learn about this stuff by themselves, just like I did.
>>697986905
>>697986875
>Just because something is a law right now doesn't mean it should be
The fuck is this relevant to what I said?
We need a law because a lot of kids aren't going to be able to consent.
>>697986553
This is getting too hard to follow.
>>697983646
Bitch pleace I am a jedi
>>697986846
Who is she ?
>>697987069
What is this suppose to be? I can't see it
>>697986572
new dogyd li li picture in the works is on the way
>>697986479
How about amazing it would be to tease a girl all day long with subtly lewd humor until she gets so worked up that you eventually find yourself under her arms after tackling you onto the bed.
>start off with a really oily massage on my bed on top of some covers
>rubbing everything except for her nips and clit
>so that whenever i finally do get there, she's focusing on how much it's actually heating up
>making sure there's plenty of really sweet wine to go. keeping hydrated is 10/10
>really jazzy or chill music goin on in the background
>keeping her clothes off and roaming around the house getting food, drinks, washing her hands, playing a game maybe
>getting to a point where she starts touching herself and then curiously asking me if i'd be alright with doing it for her
>start swirling my tongue around her nipple and making sure she gets just as erect as she would want
>letting her gasp her instructions while telling me how to guide my two fingers in her vag
>feeling her walls clamp down every now and then onto my fingers, getting them all lubed up
>getting out a vibe and taping it to the top of her clit then heading out to subway
>squriming just the slightest over the low setting while giving her card to the cashier for her sandwich, me playing it super casually and teasing her by commenting on subtly lewd things to the cashier
>making some of the blood redivert to her head to blush a bit
>getting back home i play with the vibe's settings while she's eating
I have a skewed definition of casual sex.
>>697987129
There's already a law against rape though.
>>697986944
>And I'm not some special case where I happen to be one of the only kids who knew about this stuff when I was young. Again, kids aren't fucking retarded. They're very inquisitive, and learn about this stuff by themselves, just like I did.
I'm sure you knew some kids who were into dicks and butts or whatever, but thats not the fucking point
It doesn't matter if it's 5 or 10 or 40% of kids who are more informed on sex than the entire state of texas. That fact of the matter is unless you can 100% assure that the vast sweeping majority of kids at X age can genuinely consent, there needs to be a law nixing anything at that age.
>>697987335
Saved, thanks friend.
>>697987367
Proving Genuine Consent is already difficult as fuck when it comes to things like alcohol without adding children to the equation, mate.
>>697987251
funny
>>697986017
> I knew what STD's and pregnancy were about when I was very young, and so do many kids.
That's bullshit and you know it. A lot of states don't have sex ed, and leave it up to the parents and church. Some kids don't even get the education they need. You can't over generalize children simply because YOU knew. You can't just look at somewhere like India for example, where young girls marry old men and say "yeah that's fine," simply because they don't know everything that sex entails. That may be an extreme example, but it's true. There's laws for a reason, it's to protect the minors who don't have the chance to know about this shit before they're adults. There's a age of consent for a reason, and you know why. You can stop defending people who literally fuck minors now, there's a huge difference between children "consenting" and an adult consenting. One has a fully developed brain, can plan ahead, and think logically, whereas the other cannot accomplish all of these.
>I'm sick of people trying to act like kids are fucking brain-dead sacks of meat who can't think.
No one fucking said that? I said they can't consent, that that they can't think. Again, you can't just over generalize all children as the same because of your personal experiences.
Anyway, you're not in charge of the laws, no single person is. You know nothing's going to change by ranting about hypocrisy of paedophilia laws on 4chan.
>>697987509
Oh this is the wip if that's what you were lookin for. Pretty sure it's gonna be chen rutting her and that appendage is actually a leg because she's using her arms to hold up her thighs.
>>697975019
Artist?
>>697987069
DOOT DOODOOT DOOOOOOT
>>697987585
Christ you sound like the PC Principal in South Park. Take a step back and look at what you've become.
I'm sure criminal offenses like rape is extremely difficult, and also something most judges and/or juries would prefer not to deal with.
Our justice system is based around "innocent until PROVEN guilty", and any justice system that could possible be valid needs to be based around this.
Rape charges ruins peoples lives, no matter if they are guilty or not.
I'm not saying most rape accusations are false, simply pointing out that SOME are, maybe because the accuser is experiencing "buyer's remorse", or simply wants to extort the accused of something.
Rape cases sucks.
>>697987735
Fuck that looks amazing, I'm actually excited.
>>697987803
>>697987395
(just butting in my $0.02 worth here)
Problem with consent threshold theory is, many adults don't really understand all the ramifications of cause and effect, especially where sex is concerned. Only upside is, we assume, that adults have more personal resources available to them than minors (jobs, flexible living potential, completed education, autonomy, etc.) Sadly, doesn't mean adults automatically have the capacity to utilize any of those. It just means that most children certainly do not have those available.
>>697987395
>That fact of the matter is unless you can 100% assure that the vast sweeping majority of kids at X age can genuinely consent, there needs to be a law nixing anything at that age.
So that means that everyone who drinks alcohol shouldn't be allowed to have sex either, right? Because according to many people, you can't consent when drunk. You'll never be able to tell if someone can genuinely consent unless you directly ask for consent, and they say yes, and that doesn't happen.
>>697987585
Absolutely this.
>>697987690
>That's bullshit and you know it
Fuck you, it is. You seriously mean to tell me that kids under whatever arbitrary age have never heard of someone getting pregnant? Have never heard of someone dying of AIDS, even on the news? Because I sure as hell did, and you can't fucking say what I did and didn't know at a certain age.
>One has a fully developed brain, can plan ahead, and think logically, whereas the other cannot accomplish all of these.
Bull. Shit. Stop trying to use this as argument because kids can plan ahead, and can think logically.
>I said they can't consent, that that they can't think.
Really? Because now you're contradicting yourself.
>One has a fully developed brain, can plan ahead, and think logically, whereas the other cannot accomplish all of these.