With all the archeological evidence proving the Bible is correct, and all the geological science showing evidence for Noah's flood, and so many Biblical prophecies coming true, why do you still stubbornly reject the simple fact that the Bible is an authoritative social and scientific work?
>>697214413
Please do prove that such archaeological evidence exists.
>>697214413
I'm going to go ahead and blame literacy
>>697214413
The claims of these threads can be refuted with a single rebuttal. I'm mostly curious why people bother bumping it by insulting a troll.
>>697214413
always remind me of this
>>697216669
>>697216470
>>697216324
>>697216219
>>697216100
>>697215839
>>697215720
Moar, this is now furry bread
margqrin...so luv in mqrame...morplox
>>697214413
The Bible is the greatest book of all time.
Facts.
![1375717_VibrantSnow_1442515687.belayalapa_[fa_ych]_no_146_twink_pet_clr_rr.png](https://cdn.randomarchive.com/b/image/1469/918/1469918607584.jpg "1375717 VibrantSnow 1442515687.belayalapa [fa ych] no 146 twink pet clr rr")
Where's proof? Post maymays
>>697215427
Not OP, but usually when we accept things as historical fact, we look at what the books written then said. Most ancient historians we believe though there are only a handful of copies in one language. The Bible has been found with hundreds if not thousands of copies in multiple languages with a consistency of 99% through the copies.
So at the very least, accepting the non miraculous events portrayed is just logical. If you refute that, we have to refute history as we know it.
>With all the archeological evidence proving the Bible is correct
nice bait, anon
i know the people on this site are literally fucking retarded, but i don't think they're THAT stupid
>>697218654
>>697220090
>>697220090
Actually you can easily tell how smart someone is going to be by how they read one book.
Also by their lack of intellect and meme posting.
>>697214413
oh look it's the never ending shitpost
FOSSILS
>>697219931
I'm the one you responded to.
I'd say that the consistency proves that the events portrayed were perceived and/or understood in the same manner, but everyone accepting it as truth doesn't make it true. You still have to consider the possibility that in the earlier days people were a lot more gullible and superstitious, as well as every claim not necessarily being stated by a 1st hand source. Unfortunately I'm not well-read on christian history so I can't really argue on the matter. All I can really say is that you can't really set a too high limit on questioning credibility.
>>697219931
99%?!?
What drugs are you on right now?
The consitency is lower than 80% from the ealiest copies to the modern ones.
>>697219931
>>697222550
To clarify: I'm not saying it should be refuted as much as questioned. It's as close as we can get to truth, so it IS fully reasonable to accept it as such. It's just ill-advised to crawl up your own ass and believe nothing can ever refute it.
>>697214413
Hey Jesus. I appreciate you still doing this.
>>697223271
Same. Makes me use my brain for half a second, and lets me enjoy the furfaggotry that follows it.
look. if evolution existed jesus would have brought it up. i mean he was the son of god for christ sake.
case closed i win.
Say my name, Bastian!
>>697218654
God is not a very good ghostwriter. You would think the Bible would have been a way better read than anonymous greentext stories at the least.
>>697223755
god i love hard blush
Jesus is so cool
>>697214413
>Argha Noah
>>697214413
>archeological evidence proving the Bible is correct
lol, look at all that archaeological evidence saying I'm allowed to kill my girlfriend if she's not a virgin.
This is the worst one yet, try again.
>>697219931
>99% consistency
yeah, no.
The 752 different variations of Catholicism are vastly different. Also, ONE book in ONE language has trouble being consistent with itself.
>>697214413
The bible existed before it was written
>>697214413
Probably for even if the bible were true, it could also be interpretations of events by clueless people thousands of years away from our civilizations.
Also, religious people read interpretations of their prophets. Saint Thomas wrote the Bible long after Jesus' death.
You interpret your old biased books as facts, we interpret you as a biased biggot. Hope it makes things clearer in your head. <3
Who is this /b/tard that people keep Photoshopping? I'm fucking kekking my ass off.
>>697222550
the truth doesnt always have to mean the facts when there is no way to get these facts sometime the truth just mean what is widely approved
Source of pic?
Shitty copy pasta b8 m8
where is OPs pic from, i see this thread all the time but idk where that source is from
>>697214413
BITCH YOU DON'T KNOW THE MEANING OF ATHEISM
>is a Canadian Christian
>>697214413
Lay the proof you are talking about in front of me and I will gladly believe.
>>697220000
Those quads though
>>697214413
Just go back you putting things up your ass to plz your God
> you can do it
>>697214413
Noahs flood was a dirrct copy right of the epic of gilgamesh and i would say there's a significant amount of evidence for both sides.
