What do you guys think about Milo Yiannopoulos and #FreeMailo? Did he deserved this ban, or it's just another feminist being upset about criticism?
#freemilo
>>696033541
No one thinks he diserves it.
i wanna know how he can combine the fact he's gay and a republican at the same time
>>696033638
Sorry I can't write. #FreeMilo not #FreeMailo like i wrote.
>>696033682
Self hating?
>>696033541
>>696033541
he's a faggot and i don't like him, but the ban is bs
>>696033764
no he said on some talk show he's not self hating
>>696033541
#freeourlordandsavior
The ban is lame.
He is lame.
Guess it works out.
>>696033682
Maybe watch some of his content and you'd know.
>>696033857
#bringbackourdragons
>>696033682
His political views aare conservative and he likes sucking dick whats not clear here
>>696033541
The ban is absolute bullshit. If they needed to issue a ban, they should have banned BOTH of them if only for consistency's sake. But then again, this is twitter we're talking about here. They've been known for banning and removing the badge from people they disagree with.
>>696033886
How can you say that?!
He's just another tag nugget trying to make a buck off of impressionable people's sensibilities.
I personally don't care about his banning, but he had to understand his Insightful behavior wasn't going to be tolerated for very long. He had warning after warning on Twitter to stop fanning the flames
>>696033541
Literally who?
Why he was banned?
>>696033670
hes an asshole
Twitter is turning into a Tumblr sjw safe space and this is only the beginning
>>696033682
>>696033764
Gays got what they wanted already. Now they don't have to force allying themselves to side with retards they disagree on pretty much everything. I'm calling it now: the next target of SJW retards are going to be gay men, especially whites.
>>696034145
Because he said the new Ghostbuster movie sucked
>>696033541
>Did he deserved this ban, or it's just another feminist being upset about criticism?
The latter one
>>696034056
I know its a private company but fuck that its the only twitter, considering its a monopoly the first amendment should be enforced on it
>>696034206
Twitter always has been moderated.
Prehapes people never took notice becuase it never offended them personally
>>696034244
So he said same thing as everyone else...
>>696034160
to assholes
>>696033541
Twitter is shit anyway
>>696033541
I hope muslim refugees throw him off a bridge
>>696033541
He can deserve it and it still be about feminists being upset about criticism. Not saying whether or not he did something wrong, but there's no denying it was a political move.
>>696034249
This
>>696033682
Because he's been pushed there by Liberals and the SJWs. Sure, a ton of his stuff is pure trolling, but I can understand his frustration.
>>696033541
The Mexican government has successfully removed journalists from Facebook and Twitter for reporting on its crimes.
>>696034265
No twitter dosent have a monoply on social media and the government has no right to force a private company to do what your asking should a bakery be forced to bake a cale for a gay wedding no they shouldn't so why should twitter put up with this attention whore
>>696034265
>I know its a private company
SJW retards couldn't give less of a fuck about that when it's about something they disagree with and you can pretty much see how they got everything going their way by throwing tantrums at mundane shit no one gives a fuck about. I say we should behave more like them and see if we can coerce them to side with us.
>>696034571
Well, maybe he thinks that inviting people that wan't to throw him off a bridge is bad idea
>>696033682
The Republican Party is chock-full of closeted gays. The few who are "out" call themselves Log-Cabin Republicans.
>>696033541
>Milo Yiannopoulos
twitter still allows all manner of actual hate speech by muslims, blacks and others, including actual exhortations to violence
milo is simply politically incorrect and a conservative and has become something of a neo-conservative darling
twitter is being run by people who allow hate speech and online harrassment, but only if it agrees with their pervasive SWP mindset
every time they banned him, he became more famous
this 'permanent' ban made him an actual force to be reckoned with at the RNC convention
social media is a mixed bag of tricks and twitter is just stupid anyway: who cares what stream-of-consciousness ramblings ever twit-head on the planet is pooping out
if you're going to 'exploit' social media, understand that it is a bastion of the left and proceed accordingly
>>696033541
Dude is a professional troll. He is professional wrestling with a nice haircut and clothes (and without the wrestling). Probably didn't deserve ban, but I don't care that he got it
>>696034221
you sound like the most enlightened individual on /b/
>inb4 tipping aggressively
>>696033682
He's an idiot troll.
Classic conservative.
>>696034361
Yeah except he had a lot of people behind him on it so he was banned as being the ringleader
>>696033541
dunno about the twitter thing, but he seems a complete slimy cunt, haven't heard a single original thought from him. Id wager his opinions and the image he cultivates are a cynical attempt to gain a particular niche audience, namely gamergate/mra types. Thats not to say i completely disagree with everything he says i just hate him, hes like a second rate Hitchens.
>>696034745
They should throw him off a bridge that coal burning attention whore is a retard he could give a fuck less about conservative values he does it for the money if he could make more money being a sjw he would be one
>>696033541
He put twitter at legal risk, so yeah they were justified in permabanning him
He broke rules and got punished for it. Deal with it sperglords
>>696034902
How is stating the blatantly obvious being a fedora tipper? Heck, you can already see it by just looking at the demographics of these groups. They're mostly filled by white women who hate men and their own race, while the high positions are mostly filled with disgusting man hating dykes. Once you take into account voting trends, it's truly a no-brainer men will still think like men even if they like taking dick up the arse. And thus, will become yet another enemy for SJW.
>>696035501
Why is the ape not banned then? I'll tell you why: double standards.
If any Men's Rights Activists, want to join an MRA skype group:
https://join.skype.com/qIInpvQlJOSM
>first amendment
>British man
...haha wow, I knew all the angry cucks on 4chan where actually stupid but this is next level.
>>696035670
Decide what is worse, SJW or Skype
>>696033541
Didn't know this sight was gonna throw its lot in with a gay guy just because he supports the same edgy troll politics /pol/'s got. He wasn't banned for being a troll, however. The ban came after he posted libel implicating her with hatespeech. I guess he felt so insecure about being a bigot that he needed to project. That's only the tip of this guy's mentally ill iceberg tho...
sauce related: after creating a fake twitter account of hers
>>696033682
He's a gay right wing republican catholic. It's almost as if you social justice cunts judge people based on single criteria and try to make everyone fit in little boxes based on your social giews, but people are more complicated than "white male" or "oppressed gay"
funny that.
>>696035697
This is obviously not a first amendment case, but whether he's British or not doesn't matter an iota. The first amendment applies to the government, not on an individual basis.
>>696034683
Where else is he supposed to go though to bring his shit to the enemy?
>>696035779
Don't join then?
I hate fags and he seems like an arrogant self entitled cunt but I have to side with the dick smoker and say that it was just a but hurt feminist
>>696033975
This
>>696035811
*site
also I forgot to mention this guy has a history of posting libel on Twitter. It's not like the first amendment applies to private institutions but I don't think Twitter wants to be associated with angsty austists playing journalist.
>>696035146
You'd win that bet, since he's outright stated that several times. He actually uses it as an argument against feminists sometimes
"I know we're both just shock jocks saying nasty things for a paycheck but at least I have the decency to admit it" etc
>>696035811
>>696036245
[citation needed]
>>696033541
Fuck this edgy fag.
The problem isnt that he was conservative and gay, but that he is religious and gay.
Leslie Jones is the epitome of a nigher. She does nigger stuff in order to get nigger paid. One side of me knows that the scumbags who posted that shit comparing her to Harambe were being sarcastic, and I HOPE she isn't so dumb that she doesn't know thay, but another side of me wants to say that you didn't have to cross that line and actually compare this monkey to one. My ager comes out at the fact that this is another example of someone playing the victim, then, since Milo is popular, Twitter decides to make him the victim.
I want to give her the benefit of the doubt and say that what people said was racist, but when Jones confirms these nigger stereotypes and plays the victim, I can only think of her as a nigger; one who thinks the system is out to get them; one who thinks black people are syatematically oppressed. Furthermore, Milo is gay and gets just as much, if not more for expressing his political beliefs, hate from the people, especially on Twitter. So, instead of this being Twitter's reaponsible move against racists, it was a blatant atyack on Conservatives. It wasn't ever about racism, it's the fact that leftists "own" Twitter.
>tl;dr Twitter banned Milo because he's conservative and has a following
>Lesbian Jones is a stereotype-perpetuating nigger 'victim'
>>696036589
Those tweets were faked. He harassed her and encouraged his followers to harass her. I'm unclear of why people are questioning the ban.
You literally cannot defend the flaming faggot when he contradicted himself a few years before.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pW20lMoWMU
>literally said twitter should ban trolls and mean comments.
He was once an SJW and now has to taste his own shit opinions.
>>696036821
I bet he'd love that.
I want to see him naked. Anyone got milo cock pics?
>>696036589
Would actually be helpful if twitter said something about it, but as far as the validity of these posts. Come on. Someone's gonna put their name on those tweets? Anons here don't even have the balls for it.
>>696036905
does that give twitter an excuse to not ban other people who are just as bad if not worse?
>>696036905
>I dont need to cite my sources
>your sources are fake
kys
>>696036883
Typing on a phone is fun.
>Alt-right internet celebs
The rise of this self-hating homosex really astounds me. I think the alt-right people are just like the SJW feminazi crowd they like to bash. They are the flip-side of the same shekel and should move from imageboards to Tumblr where they belong.
>>696036883
So systematically oppressed you get to star in a hollywood movie just because you are one.
>>696033682
>omg 20 years ago republicans were like nazis
>anti gay marriage oh shit
>that means they're still nazis
fuck off you dumb shit liberal.
Just a reminder democrats were anti-gay marriage too.
Literally neither party wanted to endorse gay marriage.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I1-r1YgK9I
>>696034221
It already is, the retards call it misogynistic that they don't find women sexually attractive.
>>696037340
My point is that she plays victim even though shes the 1%. That's a nigger thing to do.
>>696037205
Real news won't cover this so it won't get "credible" journalism. All you need to do though is google Leslie Jones fake tweets and you'll get a bunch of gossip sites writing about it. That and use your brain, retard.
>>696036905
no they werent, you can see them now...
fuckwit
>>696037203
No. If you breach the terms of service then you get banned. He did multiple times. Why did he sign up to twitter if he wanted to harass others knowing full well it was against the terms of service?
>>696037524
Got a link to them on twitter?
>>696037496
Excuses excuses.
Get out.
>>696036905
the faked ones involved gassing kikes, they are real
her calling milo an uncle tom is also real
her directing people to attack others is also real
the only one who should have been banned is harambitch
>>696033541
she's a gay/faggot so fuck it i don't care
>>696037485
>harassed for being a black person in a shitty movie
>playing the victim
and i'm sure your aggrieved white man complex is justified by your cushy basement dwelling lifestyle
>>696033682
You've been programmed to think that by just being a conservative you're automatically a racist, bigot, homophobic, greedy, white male. All of which are a complete lie, if you take some time to look at liberals throughout history and present day you'd see that that description is more accurate when referring to a liberal than a conservative.
>>696034683
It's not a big deal that twitter banned Milo, they are completely allowed to do that, that isn't what pisses people off. The problem is they are lying hypocrites, they say they stand for free speech and they use shitty reasons for banning people they don't like so it doesn't look like they're banning him and others for any reason other than "we personally don't like you and your views and we don't want you to share them on our site" which is the truth.
I miss the days when youngsters were left wing. Now the trend has reversed and its all far right kids.
>>696037754
See you can't even troll right. Doesn't work when you end the conversation with the other side feeling smarter than you.
>>696037524
I agree
Besides the validity of the tweets, Milo never conspired against her. He never told his followers to go hate. She said she was being harassed and played victim, then Milo, being gay and constantly getting harassed by leftists and anti-homosex, told her to just deal with it. Finally Twitter, being far leftist, metaphorically said "you're conservative" and banned him, despite knowing that Milo gets more hate than she does.
>>696037884
free speech =/= libel
>>696033541
I used to kind of like him, but he's become to much of an agitator and a hypocrite for me to really like him any more.
He shouldn't be banned though, because Twitter is such a large platform, it has the moral responsibility to uphold free speech.
>>696037939
Yeah right, try going in a crowd full of teenagers and chanting "trump 2016 trump 2016"
See if you can survive.
>>696037941
>>696037812
Aren't you being paid to shill for hillary? You're in the wrong thread.
>>696038070
Maybe its just the ones who shout the loudest on the internet are mostly far righters.
>>696037939
Methinks you spend too much time lurking. The kids these days are as leftist as ever.
>>696034820
Most of this is true, except this time I think it had more to do with the fact that he upset a celebrity than anything else.
Twitter's allure has always been in providing the illusion that you are on a platform that allows you to interact with famous people as if they were one of you.
WikiLeaks was spot-on when they called it Cyber-Feudalism. Milo upset a member of the Twitter royal class and he was punished for it.
>>696033541
Free speech on privately owned websites doesn't really apply. They can shut you down whenever they want. And they are in the right to do so. So I don't care if a redpilled fag is shut down. Social media is run and owned by lefty fags and shills. Thats why I don't have any anymore.
>>696038206
Okay.
>>696037724
https://twitter.com/Lesdoggg/status/564664734268411906
>>696038406
Alex Jones got cucked so hard in this video. and this is hot off the heels of getting trolled earlier in the convention. you cuckservatives are really losing your edge don't you miss the days of Limbaugh's reign?
>>696033541
Sure he is an asshole, but there are no circumstances in which free speech should be limited, unless you are actively calling for violence to be committed against others.
If it's covered by the 1st Amendment you should be able to say it.
>>696037812
Lesbian Jones:
>making a remake of a movie that didn't need to be remade
>playing a literal black stereotype in movie
>pretending to be victim when people say stupid shit on Twitter
Milo, the Glorious Faggot:
>gets just as much hate, but he's conservative
>tells nigger lesbian to deal with it because he does
>banned for being white and having conservative following
>comedian
Next is Chris Rock for being "too white, because he's in the 1%," and making jokes about his own race, particularly like Lesbian Jones, being ignorant. Additionally, because he is conservative, he will be banned for having a big following.
Contradictory, he might not be banned, however, because he has so many fans and he's a bigger celebrity than Milo, and it would look bad for Twitter.
>>696035811
Not why he was banned.
According to Twitter he was banned for "inciting harassment". Which is ambiguous and capriciously enforced on twitter at best.
For instance, Leslie Jones posting a tweet where a 17 year-old girl compared her to Harambe and telling her fans to "Get her!" is clearly inciting harassment. Did twitter punish Jones for it? On the contrary, Jack Dorsey himself reached out to Jones in private and Milo was banned later that night.
>>696033541
that hatemongering faggot? why should anyone listen to his hateful bullshit?
serious question if right wingers hate the liberal leftist social media why do the use them? Is it purely to troll?
>>696038206
The internet youths were all fingerbanging to bernie, at least 90% of them. It's literally just the chans where there's a bunch of young trump supporters, and even here I'd wager its half trolls pretending and about 40% 50 year old men who hang out here because they have no life. You know that theres a lot of those here. Hell I'm 28 so I'm about 10 years too old to still be here.
>>696038721
If you think alex jones walking into the lions den, with a smile, making them all freak out while he stands there and takes it all in laughing on the inside... is being cucked??? clearly you don't understand the word...
>>696039227
What else is there?
>>696038721
What? Did we watch the same video? TYT got so fucked. They got outclassed and played like a fiddle in a matter of minutes it's retarded. Truly hats off to Alex. He hit them right where it hurts them and exposed their blatant hypocrisy. I'm a bit sad for Ben Mankiewicz. His face throughout the whole debacle was that of unadulterated shame and self-hatred.
>>696039185
MRA group?
Like a volunteer AA meeting?
those things that people don't goto even when it's legally required?
Sign me up!
I love feeling pathetic.
>>696037317
It's funny that you progressives are always so quick to point out that the Democrats being the party that founded the KKK was all in the past and irrelevant today, but continue to profess that Republicans hate gay people.
Republicans dropped the gay hate back in the 90s. In fact they chose gays over Muslims in the wake of the Orlando massacre, something that Democrats definitely cannot say they did.
>>696039407
Skype is compromised. It's likely a honeypot.
>>696033541
#deportmilo
Why isn't there a White House petition to deport his faggy ass back to Britain or Greece?
Conservativetards did the same thing a few years back with Piers Morgan because they value "free speech" so much.
>>696039293
This
>>696039569
Milo isn't a raging piece of shit.
We should deport you.
Predicting @Jack has pierced a Twitter artery that will bleed and bleed until its goes the way of digg.
l think he's gay
>>696033541
A business is free to choose who use their platform, the only way there would be an argument on the topic is if the government was responsible
>>696039185
Sorry, I'm a strong advocate for a matriarchal society, where men have little to no rights and are are only allowed to work, reproduce, and move about freely at the whim of a superior female.
>>696039762
You really think anyone gives a shit? Twitter is and always has been about pretending you're an important celebrity with hundreds of people really caring about what you just had for lunch. As long as people are egotistical cunts twitter's business model is unkillable.
>>696039293
>>696039358
favourite vids was seeing all the times potential rape victim ana was against fat shaming, then seeing her screaming at alex that he's a fat fuck, or maybe she saw a moment of weakness and shouted it at cenk, i can dream...
>>696039358
He did what he has always done, troll and make a scene in hopes that people will go online and read his cool conspiracy theories.
>>696033541
Sieg Heil!!!!!
>>696039934
They have those societies. They live as iron age hunter gatherers. Please join one.
>>696040220
Ana is the only sane one there, I'd wife the shit out of her
>>696039762
Sadly, no one will care. The ratio of conservative to liberal celebrities is roughly 3 for every 100.
As long as people imagine they are in a room with famous people, twitter will continue to slog on. No one is going to care if twitter suppresses right wing bloggers and reporters.
Twitter's downfall will come because it has no legitimate way to generate profits, not because it stifles unpopular opinions.
#FreeMilo it is stupid cunts like that ape that are destroying free speech. pic related it's her
>>696040401
She'll probably take you up on that.
She's 30, alone, and childless. It's a downhill ride for her from here on out.
>>696040589
I think you're confused.
>>696040411
>coming 2018 twitter gold; access to celebrity tweets 19.99 @ month and 2020 twitter platinum; ability to add new friends and post internet links 39.99 a month
>>696040589
I'm 28 alone and childless, we'll make it work. My recent ex was 22 so it'll be interesting to go the other way and date older
>>696040221
Yet he got a massive reaction out of them with basic stuff. It shows TYT is so used to living in an echo-chamber the moment they have to face opposing views they go ballistic. I mean, let's see what Alex did:
>got Cenk to go ballistic and spout a bunch of incoherent babble
>Cenk insulted the guy that was with Alex and Alex invited him to have a debate with Cenk, the moment Alex said that Cenk went all "why should I give him a platform" thus proving he's NOT in favour of dialogue, he's all for echo-chambers
>Ana came out as a complete and utter hypocrite calling Alex a fat fuck after all the many videos she's proclaimed she's SO against fat shaming and shaming in general
>Alex exposed their funding although he said Saudi Arabia instead of Qatar and Al Jazeera, but it still made them go full snackbar damage control mode which only made them seem even more retarded
>Jimmy "tongue" Dore spit in Alex's face then ran away like a pussy. In a video they did in the past of a similar occurrence, Cenk blasted someone who spit in someone's face, but now that it's one of his crew he's "all about it". Haven't fired him, and will not fire him. In other words: he's a massive hypocrite
All that happened in a matter of fucking minutes. Truly outstanding. Again, hats off to Alex for playing them like a motherfucking fiddle.
>>696035670
MRA = Feminism
Claiming to fight for equality and a better life for all, but really just ugly betas that have been spurned by the opposite sex.
https://youtu.be/TPihPrNseAo
If this is what you fought against instead of the ReturnOfTheKings, I would be with you.
![1362395134706[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Ki9eEjB.jpg "1362395134706[1].jpg")
>>696033682
>>696034800
>>696035835
>Milo
>republican
Milo has never voted Republican in his life because HE'S NOT AMERICAN YOU GODDAMN RETARDS
>>696040793
MRA = reactionary movement to feminism overstepping its boundaries.
If feminism was more about equality, and less about female entitlement and man hating dykes making government screw men, MRA would not exist.
>>696040793
Hear hear. There should be no feminists or mras, just egalitarians. 7 billion egalitarians.
>>696034693
wtf I love Boris Johnson even more now
>>696040866
this. I still love the glorious faggot tho.. no homo.
>>696040866
No, but he's not for the monarchy. Which is what republican means you fucking moron, it means a supporter of a republic, which is what britain would be out of the monarchy.
>>696040513
>jest let me take those 4 seats
>>696034265
You don't like fascism through private industry? That's just unamerican.
>>696033541
Wtf did he even do , rip in to a shitty actress playing in a shittie move
Milo is a critic of feminism, not a feminist.
Also, he a good boy, dindu nuffin, etc.
>>696033541
Seems like it was just Twitter trying to send a message. He barely said anything himself and blm supporters seem to have free reign to preach hatred on there.
>>696040786
Oh yeah, I totally forgot his opening punch about his PAC recruiting "for the revolution". He's obviously talking about Wolf's PAC controversy about its MASSIVE employment spending. In other words: he called him a fraud. That alone got Cenk to sweat like a pig.
>>696041130
the sad part is that you actually think you're being clever
>>696037485
>shes the 1%
>>696034672
Sounds like exactly the ideals the founding fathers were after, free speech except when a private company takes major control of said speech and then restricts it based on their opinions.
>>696040793
Everything in your video, I am personally fighting against.
I am trying to rid gender roles for boys, not just fight bad SJWs.
You should support us, because all you listed, is exactly what a large portion is fighting.
The media portrays us wrong. I swear.
>>696033541
He was being a dick to a lady that didn't deserve it. He said she was playing the victim but they were calling her and her and nigger and harambe and stuff because of Ghostbusters.
>>696033886
he is entertaining as fuck
>>696041556
Yes all men should be weak pussies who can't defend themselves. Estrogen only.
>>696034056
just like facebook does
>>696033682
Because he cares about the economy?
Also, if you find a conservative that is not all that religious (or not at all religious) aka Rand Paul, then you'll see what about 1/3 of the party is like. Typically more like a libertarian that just doesn't see the libertarian party as having a prayer against the Dems.
If you go back in history, the Republican party has historically been the ones to unify the country. They hired, freed, and educated blacks after slavery ended, the party has been consistently for seeing people as 'a person' and not as their particular racial or sexual identity, and the party as a whole is generally responsible for FAR more charity organizations to help the poor.
The democratic party is a big system of categorize, divide, conquer. They find a 1% box that everyone fits into, tell you that you're being unjustly treated because you're in that box, then promise you free things for being in the box.
"You're black so you're oppressed and helpless."
"You're gay so you're opressed and helpless."
"You have a disease so you you're oppressed and helpless."
"You use alcohol so you're oppressed and helpless."
Literally every single person is in some box and is somehow oppressed.
>>696034376
>>696041679
I did not say that.
>>696041687
4chan even does it.
In liberal bias.
>>696040898
>MRA = reactionary movement to feminism overstepping its boundaries.
50%!
The other 50% is ridding forced roles for boys.
>>696034672
In holland turks have a phone line they can call to rat out dutch turks saying shit about erogan turkface
>>696035697
>not allowed to have thoughts beyond current rules.
>we only care about the constitution as a written rule, not the spirit of the rule and why it exists.
Great argument bro.
>>696042059
You're starting to come off like "i want boys to wear bikinis so i can fap at the beach" now.
Fuck off
>>696042059
>The other 50% is ridding forced roles for boys.
This has nothing to do with feminism. That's precisely my point. Feminism should be about equality in front of the law, not about wanting to deny biology on all levels of society.
>>696042238
Why did you make this issue sexual?
>>696033541
I think he's pretentious about every opinion that he presents.
He flaunts that he's gay.
Going against retarded feminists makes him think that he's overtly smart when in reality anyone can debate retard logic.
And finally, the thing that makes me most mad about Milo is that people just circle jerk over him because he doesn't like feminism. Plain and simple, nowadays all you have to say is "hurr feminism amiriteguyz?" And all of leddit will come to your protection. We never think for ourselves anymore. You should be able to answer with an answer other than "because it's stupid" when asked why you hate something.
>inb4 ur a feminist
>>696042723
>reddit is anti-feminist
>4chan is pro-feminist
what?
You infiltrating redditors are too fucking obvious.
Reverse psychology methods.
fuck off reddit.
>>696042280
I don't see a problem with either.
I want an androgynous society, where boys and girls have the same rules.
No misandry or misogyny based rules. Sheer gender neutrality. Freedom to be as masculine or feminine as I want to be.
>>696042934
ohh you want to be a trap without being seen as a freak.
He broke the ToS (and this wasnt even the first time) so yeah, he did
>>696041679
I wouldn't bother, he needs to see for himself. He still thinks boys come into their gender the way girls do, by simply growing older, and that society is this thing that shepherds them towards these harmful, unwanted roles. He doesn't know how men have to be forged, he doesn't know how depriving us of an upbringing of competition, strength and independence can destroy us, and more importantly he doesn't know how easily a society of emasculated men can be controlled.
One day he might though, and he'll graduate from MRA when that happens.
"you should get to be anything you want to be!"
lol.
>>696042238
Sounds like your hang-up. Feminists get it right when they say that masculinity and machismo as peddled by society is fragile as fuck.
>>696034265
How is it a monopoly?
>>696036245
This guy is a hero. Only person I. The media that followed gamergate and reported objectively. Bunch of newfag morons. Now your heads in shame.
>>696042879
Haha right. Home of the white knights is anti feminism and the place that made the phrase "tits or gtfo" famous is pro feminism.
2.5/10. Replied.
SJWs upset by clash of opinions and ideas
Twitter needed to do something drastic to stay remotely relevant
Twitter is dying
>>696043243
except that's not even an argument, it's a shaming tactic and blatant manipulation
>>696034820
The difference between Milo and the muslims/SJWs is that companies like Twitter are afraid of the latter because they are prone to tantrums and violence. That's it! That's why some groups get preferential treatment under harassment policies.
>>696042934
>I don't see a problem with either.
You're part of the problem then.
>I want an androgynous society, where boys and girls have the same rules.
They already do. That's my whole point. The law does overall have the same rules for everyone, it just so happens the very few laws that do (see: the draft) are so due to logistics and long term planning. Women are weak, men are strong. You can sacrifice millions of men in war and the country can repopulate, women can only have 1 baby at a time while a single man can impregnate thousands of women.
>No misandry or misogyny based rules. Sheer gender neutrality. Freedom to be as masculine or feminine as I want to be.
What about the people who WANT those SOCIAL rules? Don't you think forcing it on them and pretty much blackmailing them if they don't agree with you is pretty much doing the exact same thing you're criticizing? Don't you see how you're pretty much a massive hypocrite?
>>696043175
Yeah if you didnt have a shit childhood you arent a REAL man!
>>696043530
Physical violence is the only true form of power.
>>696041446
U mad cuz I'm stylin on u?
>>696042934
How are you going to bypass biology?
Sorry, freakshow, men are men and women are women. They aren't interchangeable, not matter how much you want that to be the reality.
>>696037043
Says you, Twitters reason for banning him was bull shit. It was always bull shit.
>>696043653
not an argument, please try to avoid the use of sarcastic paraphrase, it really does slaughter discourse
https://alfredmacdonald.com/2012/12/26/dissecting-the-frog-on-sarcastic-paraphrase/
>>696041520
The 1% starts at about 250k a year. How much do you think she makes working in hollywood, staring in movies with 150 million dollar budgets?
>>696043656
http://www.jack-donovan.com/axis/2011/03/violence-is-golden/
Milo is my favorite homo
Hopefully more of the LGBT community will share his ideals when God Emperor Trump gets elected
>>696043530
These companies, and really society at large, fall to the same tactics that you use to break a horse. You don't treat it well, you don't sweet talk it, you crush its spirit, you ride its ass for every toe out of line, you destroy its ability to revolt.
And like the purpose of any social justice movement, once it's broken, it works for you.
>>696043882
Btw i'm a gay hispanic with native American ancestry
Check your privilege shit lord
>>696043414
And "you're a pussy and not a real man if you play the flute/are introverted/don't like sports/enjoy cooking/vote Democrat/major in an abstract field/don't want to be the center of attention etc." is not part of a culture of shaming and manipulation?
>>696040411
Fry is a liberal.
I would argue his leaving lessened its popularity a fair bit.
>>696043956
>native american
If you say you're part cherokee, ow'll fucking kill your lying ass.
>>696043956
>hispanic
>>696043956
>with native American ancestry
Yup. That is precisely what hispanic means, you fucking ding dong.
>>696033682
the 'liberals' are now supporting the voters who belong to a cult that is openly anti-gay, anti-women, anti-democracy and pro sharia. Especially in europe...
So it perfectly makes sense to go the other way.
>>696043787
Ok so where's YOUR argument? Where's the proof that kids need to have the kind of childhood you were talking about?
>>696043653
Actually real men tend to come from vreat childhoods with both parents. Single mother households produce depressed boys who either live their entire lives as inferior men, unsure how to get ahead in life or give in early to drugs and violence. Single mothers mass produce social ills. Boys raised by a father and a mother usually do well in life because they have a stronger understanding of social roles, so the world is easier to make sense of to them.
>>696044245
Hispanic means Spainish/Latin american, has nothing to do with being native. That is why you can be non-white hispanic or white hispanic.
>>696043175
So as a man from a first-world country with plenty of "prosperity" you are a beta male unworthy to reproduce.
>>696039569
Piers belittles people and then actively seeks to change the Constitution by making a huge deal out of the gun issue. He also tries to tell Americans what they're doing wrong.
Milo is no less a douche, but he supports our Constitution and its enforcement, and he pushes back against people who would try to walk all over our ways of life.
Both are disliked quite understandably, but only one of these two actually has the fucking audacity to try to change our system of governance (no matter how broken it might currently be).
In short, don't equate unequal things. These examples are different, and to try to say they are similar is simply dishonest absolutism.
TL;DR - go fuck yourself, you fuckwit.
Great, the thread has been overrun by conservative Christians.
Gif related.
>>696044973
yup
fuckin disgraceful, but there's nowhere to go but forward once you accept it
>>696043027
>>696043714
Am I hurting anyone?
Or am i just too unpleasing to look at?
;) You guys are the reasons feminism is so radical.
>>696043619
I'm not forcing anything, but acceptance to those who want freedom.
I'm not telling you, that you can't follow your gender roles. Go ahead! Be masculine! Just let me choose whatever I want.
I'm not a hypocrite, because i'm not telling you how to dress and act. I'm just telling you to not tell other people how to live.
>>696033840
Wrong, he literally himself said on the recent JRE podcast and many times before as well, that if there was invented a pill that makes gays straight, he would be the first one to sign up for that. His reasoning was that he really wants children, and it pains him to not being able to conceive a child with a person he loves through intercourse like straight people. Strange reasoning, but that's what he said and it somewhat makes sense
i don't agree with his views but he shouldn't have been banned
>>696041281
This.
This whole scenario is a libertarian's cuckdream. I don't see what y'all are so mad about.
>>696045355
What about the people who WANT the rigid social rules that dictate how other people live? What about their rights?
>>696045152
>(no matter how broken it might currently be).
So you are saying that even if the system has problems, it's wong to try to fix them?
Cuck
>>696045767
They can impose the rules they want on themselves. They dont need the goverment for that
>>696045767
That's not a right.
You don't get the right, to tell someone who to act, if their actions are hurting nobody.
>>696045355
>but acceptance to those who want freedom.
Is that why feminists throw a hissy-fit every single time someone dares to suggest gender roles are in fact NOT a social construct? That it has a very intimate biological foundation, and that there is in fact a plethora of differences between the sexes?
>I'm not telling you, that you can't follow your gender roles. Go ahead! Be masculine! Just let me choose whatever I want.
If that's the case, then the same should apply to you right now then. Go ahead. Be whatever you want to be. Now stop pretending society has to accept your beliefs. The law already sees you as an equal.
>I'm just telling you to not tell other people how to live.
If only "telling" was all that you were doing. The truth is that your mentality have got us into a state where people are afraid of speaking about facts. The chilling effect is real. The moment people state a fact they risk their jobs. The moment a man dares to wear a t-shirt with scantly women given to him by a woman he has to profoundly apologise for it and cry in television. It's pure blackmailing. I could go on telling you about the many occurrences where absolutely retarded shit like that have happened forever, so please don't come with that bullshit about "just telling". You're NOT just telling us, you're BLACKMAILING the people who disagree with you.
>>696046093
>The moment people state a fact they risk their jobs
>this level of fearmongering
>>696046247
Is that why even Nobel prize winners have to renounce their jobs for JOKING about women being more "soft"? Please. If Nobel prize winners lose their job, what makes you think the average Joe has any chance in hell of keeping his.
>>696046409
Average Joe can do whatever he wants because he is irrelevant. Nobody gives a shit
>>696033541
i want /pol/ to leave
and milo is leftist trash
>>696046528
It's actually quite the contrary. Average Joe is easy to bully, and HR will not spare a second deciding to kick him out. I could go on about the abhorrent state of HR departments all around the western world, but I'd end up writing a handful of books.
>>696033541
He didnt deserve the ban by any means. But he is a prick
>>696046732
I guess its really hard for autists to avoid saying something that they know is gonna get them in trouble in their job
>>696045863
>completely changes topic
>goes on the attack for no reason on unrelated topic that isn't even the original subject
My dude, you're everything that's wrong with people, the Internet, Internet arguments, and life in general. The fewer of your kind, the greater the chance the world can actually be a great place.
But good luck with insulting people on the internet, man. Generally, though, just regurgitating something you read somewhere else (or what someone said to you) really doesn't score that many cool points.
I'll keep hoping that people like you can grow up someday.
Which of these positions do you disagree with /b/?
dukeforsenate.com/issues
PROTIP: You agree with all of them.!
youtube.com/watch?v=OJ97gEFBH5k
Holy shit what the fuck is it with faggy political teenagers and being sperglord hypocrites?
It's like: If your people want to ban gays you're like 'well it's a private business they should be able to do what they want', but if your people are a victim of censorship it somehow violates your first ammendment? Fuck off, idiots.
I'm speaking as someone who's right of center. I fucking hate the left. But if they're saying 'we want to have a shitty blog site with a lower character limit than fucking IRC because we're morons' the correct response isn't 'HEY! WE WANNA BE MORONS TOO'.
Seriously, choke on a big black dick Milo.
>>696036589
Are those her lines from the movie?
>>696046927
Now you're just moving the goalpost. Good job. How can we even make a better society when people can't even state basic facts without risking their well being? And I'm not just talking during working hours. This shit extends way beyond the working place all the way into the internet. It's happened so many times it's becoming an absolute cliche: the moment people disagree with the feminist dogma of the month, they get doxed and their employer end up succumbing to the witch hunt and firing them.
>>696047077
He has a massively punchable face though.
I can't stand his faggot face.
>>696047077
>flat tax
hmm nope, this is globalist cuckery.
>>696047193
Are you mentally retarded or just pretending?
If they had to issue a ban, BOTH of them should have been banned. What they did was selective punishment because the cunt was a nigger and Milo was a gay conservative.
>>696047255
>How can we even make a better society when people can't even state basic facts without risking their well being?
Define "basic fact"
>This shit extends way beyond the working place all the way into the internet.
If you are dumb enough to use the internet with your real name you are an idiot and deserve to get fired
> It's happened so many times it's becoming an absolute cliche
way less common than you make it sound
>>696046093
1.
Here's the thing, Gender Roles are based off biology. But many people DON'T FIT THAT, so we must respect that.
Like me, I don't fit my gender roles.
So you need to understand that, and ALLOW me to be of some contribution to society.
I need to be allowed to get a job. I need to be treated as an equal.
Why? Because I am actively trying to contribute to society, and i am not hurting anyone.
Yes, the majority of people follow their biology.
But the odd ones out, need to be respected.
And those with non-trans impulses, need to be treated as equals as well.
2.
Society does have to accept my beliefs, if I am not hurting anybody.
You do not have to take part, but this is America. And Cultural Diversity, in a way which does not restrict freedom, is the most American you can be.
3.
Half the SJW stuff is utter bullshit.
And I stand beside you. What does that t-shirt with sexualized women do? Nothing, it does no harm. Thus i am okay with it.
And the people who are blackmailing you, are fucking it up for me too.
I am an everybody activist, that includes Heterosexual Cis-White Men. I fight for your rights, and I fight those who discriminate against you. I do not give black people free passes to say racist shit against whites.
But, I will also fight you, when you step on MY rights to express myself, when nobody is hurt.
>>696047452
>What they did was selective punishment because the cunt was a nigger and Milo was a gay conservative.
No. Milo broke the ToS several times before. This was the last straw
The MRA guy is actually a tranny that wants other men to cuck themselves for his own degenerate desires to be safe as well.
How pathetic, nobody is on your case any more.
>>696047452
>Are you mentally retarded or just pretending?
Wow, how ironic you post this while completely ignoring the content of my post. Can you comprehend English, retard? I'm not saying it's fair you fucking autist, I'm saying they don't have to be fair and the alt-right is being inconsistent by saying they have to be.
>>696033541
Would wife if I was gay. #freemilo
>>696047543
>Define "basic fact"
Men and women are different, and many of the discrepancies can be easily explained using that as foundation. The moment you ignore context is the moment you reach a wrong conclusion based off of baseless idealism.
>If you are dumb enough to use the internet with your real name you are an idiot and deserve to get fired
Once again moving the goalpost. Good job. And no, I can tell you a handful of people who have doxed without using their real name.
>way less common than you make it sound
Bullshit.
>>696047767
He likes black dudes
>>696047578
Are you autistic this is 4chan not tumblr dumb fuck
>>696047949
Learn to write english before calling others autistic, faggot
>>696047578
>I am an everybody activist, that includes Heterosexual Cis-White Men.
This has never been the case and the extremists will always attack that group of people.
You simply want to manipulate men into encouraging your degenerate behavior.
>>696047578
Blatantly b8
>image
Why do you give away your bait like that, wtf?
>>696039320
Underrated post.
>>696047695
I have very valid points.
The fact, that you are not hearing me out, and judging me based on my transness, is exactly why SJWs are so hysterical.
I had valid points, which you rejected based on outward appearance.
>>696047578
>so we must respect that.
Again: if only that was all YOU were doing. That's THE WHOLE ISSUE. You're blackmailing people and they're losing their job because they DO NOT agree with your beliefs.
>Society does have to accept my beliefs, if I am not hurting anybody.
Bullshit.
>You do not have to take part, but this is America. And Cultural Diversity, in a way which does not restrict freedom, is the most American you can be.
That's historical revisionism. America used to be for the whites only with a nuclear family unit, and even whites had a hierarchy. Italians and the rest of the southern-Europeans were borderline nigger tier, while the scandis, anglos, and Germans were top tier. Diversity was NEVER part of the foundation of America. It was a very recent afterthought. You could even argue that's what's currently destroying America and Europe, which is why many people are AGAINST your ideology. It's not as feeble as you're making out to be, and has many long term repercussions. Some of which we're already experiencing in everyday life.
>Half the SJW stuff is utter bullshit.
State a single SJW point which isn't bullshit. I've had the dismay of having to face many SJW retards as of late, and everything the spout is nothing more than emotional babble with no basis in reality.
>Heterosexual Cis-White Men
Okay, this is bait. I'll stop now.
>>696033541
I think he doesn't really deserve it,
but anyone who thinks of him as anything more than a self-serving provocateur is a bit silly.
>inb4 self-serving automatically means "negative influence"
>>696047578
1. Plenty of trans people got jobs before the 90's. You just never heard about it, because they kept to themselves. Call it shame, call it persecution, whatever. This has been going on forever. Nothing at all stops you from contributing to society.
>EXCEPT YOUR EGO.
2. People accept your beliefs now more than they ever have. The biggest problem is that all of these people want all the attention now. You may want equality and happy hugs all around, but so many don't - they want preferential treatment. This is a new thing in the 21st century. This wouldn't be a big deal if people weren't so hypersensitive. But people who think they don't fit a gender would be able to do whatever they wanted if they weren't making such a big fuss about it.
>EXCEPT THEIR EGO.
3. Thank you for saying that. I'm happy you're an everybody activist. I support you being you, but I do so with the caveat that there really shouldn't be any special treatment for anyone, because if you're really just trying to roll with it and contribute, then there isn't a need to call attention to any of this stuff.
>EXCEPT YOUR EGO.
I'm not suggesting that people be closeted. I'm suggesting that people be who they are and all of us move on with our lives because ain't no one got time for this. It's something people should strive for. This message is something that really needs to be heard, however, by the SJW community.
In the end, dude, I hope your life is a good one and you find happiness. But understand that my biggest problem with your lifestyle isn't the lifestyle, it's the serious amount of attention that people like you need to call to it. I'll even give you the benefit of the doubt and support that you might be the sanest... traptivist? ...who's ever posted on this site. But until people can clear their egos out of this, we're not gonna get anywhere.
No hate at'cha, and all the best to ya.
>>696048633
>You're blackmailing people and they're losing their job because they DO NOT agree with your belief
When did the person you're talking to do this?
>>696048633
>Italians and the rest of the southern-Europeans were borderline nigger tier, while the scandis, anglos, and Germans were top tier.
Are these the "basic facts" you mentioned in >>696047255
Because if so, lol
>>696047660
Yet the nigger didn't even have a warning. Nah mate, it was selective punishment because he's conservative and gay. Not only that that, but it was a bullshit ban. They made him responsible for the ""abuse"" of other people he has no control over.
The past incidents you're talking about were bullshit, too. Go look at the context and you'll see what I mean.
>>696047712
So, you think it's okay to ban people just because you disagree with them?
>>696049043
>Are these the "basic facts" you mentioned in
>Because if so, lol
"I've never read a single history book on American history": the post.
>>696049096
>Yet the nigger didn't even have a warning.
I think losing his verified symbol was a preety obvious one
>it was selective punishment because he's conservative and gay
No proof
>They made him responsible for the ""abuse"" of other people he has no control over.
You are either blind or dishonest, because his intention was clearly to get his followers to attack someone
>The past incidents you're talking about were bullshit, too.
Not an argument
>Go look at the context and you'll see what I mean.
Not as long as you refuse to look at the context yourself
>>696049043
>When did the person you're talking to do this?
Now you're just being pedantic. You know precisely what I'm talking about. But since you need me to state the obvious; I'm using it as shorthand for the absolute vast majority of people who share his beliefs and who do blackmail dissenters.
>>696035542
>Heck,
sir this is a family site
>>696033541
I'll give the fact that he's fucking hilarious to him, but he's really just being an attention whore. I agree with a lot of his views, but come on. He walks into some of his debates and conferences with a yard long dildo sometimes.
Still love him, though. Seems chill.
>>696035670
Hey didn't I see you in a dick rate thread yesterday?
>>696035811
>bix nood
Hahahhaha classic
>>696041556
>>696042059
>>696047578
>>696048284
Chrishop! Get out of here! Shoo shoo!
>people confusing an independent company's terms of use with freedom of speech laws
>>696049968
Who posted my chat in a dick rate thread? O.o
I never visit those.
>>696049398
>I think losing his verified symbol was a preety obvious one
You were saying? Speaking of losing badges, Nero lost his badge for far more mundane shit than she did, and he lost it permanently. The whole purpose of the badge is to verify the identity of public figures. When you use it as a "slap on the wrist" for saying the wrong things, you're doing it wrong.
>No proof
If by proof you mean we need to have a mind-reading machine able to 100% tell us what these people are thinking, then I suppose I'll have to agree. But even the most guillible of retards can piece this together and see what's twitter is aiming. And of course it's not just twitter, this is also happening in other social media sites like facebook on a political basis.
>You are either blind or dishonest, because his intention was clearly to get his followers to attack someone
You should seriously read the post. If his statements qualify as "calling for a witch hunt" then HER statement are WAY beyond that into full blown crusades.
>Not an argument
Except it is. It shows twitter already had beef with Nero. Recurring incidents just adds redundancy to the already blatantly obvious.
>Not as long as you refuse to look at the context yourself
You seriously should. All arguments aside, how can you reach a conclusion based on limited information without looking at the context? Do it. Stop being a lazy motherfucker and look at the context.
>>696033541
Until this week, I thought that Milo and Breitbart were satirical...
>>696037812
Was wondering when the anti-white redditors would show up
>>696037043
that pic is great
>>696050558
Forgot the pic. And I just noticed all the many spelling mistakes and omitted words. I think it's time for me to go to bed. I'm tired as fuck.
>>696048282
Fuck you
>>696050751
nope all of this is real and very serious
Heh
>>696038406
ow it was the gimp of cenk who did this wtf sneak attack suckerspit
>>696049043
He is right though, Italians were hated for a while, Irish, etc. My grandfather was rabidly against Italians and fucking hated them.
>>696042723
>>696045188
Yes please go back to le reddit
>>696050751
What rock did you crawl out from under?
>>696033682
>How can anyone be a retarded faggot
Look in a mirror
>>696033541
For a conservative libertarian, Milo is pretty based. And twitter is the lamest shit ever and I hate hashtag bullshit, but having said all that...
#freemilo
>>696033541
Fuck this alt-right faggot.
Far-right or nothing.
