How do you feel about the Flat Earth theory?
Impressed at the lengths people will go to just so they don't have to admit they're wrong.
Autechre elseq 1-5 is not released on vinyl
We're on a giant cosmic Frisbee
>>696024333
Trips of truth
/thread
you can see the north face of ipswich bay from hampton beach, which is 40 miles away. let's find a chart to see how much water bulge should be preventing you from seeing that, according to globalists
Looks pretty flat to me
>>696024215
It is the only current theory that adequately explains how our planet works. Public education has been corrupting the minds of others with lies.
>>696024333
meaning what?
>>696024665
Doesn't prove a thing
>>696024832
It's not even a theory, it's a myth
There's no rational thought in it
>>696024832
Hello
>>696024819
get out of Kansas
>>696024971
Hello?
>>696024215
"theory"
theories are plausible and supported
No one actually believes in a flat earth OP.
>>696024735
>>696024665
according to this chart, created and supplied by globalists, you should not be able to see the north face of ipswich bay from hamton, because at a distance of 40 statute miles ipswich bay should be Below 1066 feet of water, beyond the horizon. any idiot can go to hampton and see that this is true, even when you put your telescope as close to ground level as possible.
there are videos on youtube of people looking at boats that are 10 miles away with a telescope, and you can see the entire hull. it looks like the ship recedes below the horizon, but once you focus the telescope it appears in full, with no curvature blocking it.
>>696024950
Oh this bullshit line of reasoning?
That means God isn't real, it's a myth, despite most of the world believing it's real.
That is what I mean by public education at it's finest. Stupid people who memorized facts they were told were accurate.
>>696025192
I don't see any reason to believe god is real.
>>696024215
I feel like this is the reason Trump has so many supporters.
>>696025167
Boats lower over the horizon as expected.
>>696024215
oh please
explain to me the mechanics of orbital trajectories then.
>>696025192
How is it bullshit to point out it's an absurd myth from primitive cultures?
>>696024832
It does not explain how the planet works on any level. In fact nothing about the world we know makes any sense with a flat one. It's impossible.
>stars, moons, other planets, and asteroids are generally round
>except Earth
>out of the trillions of planets in the known universe, ours is the only one that is flat for some reason
>>696024215
>>696025167
mirage haze from the water
>>696025453
>B-b-b-but... Eart look flats
>>696024735
we can also see from this globalist chart that at a distance of 7 miles, the curvature elevation is 32 feet. that means that if you sail 7 miles away from the statue of liberty the bottom 32 feet of it should disappear. at first glance this appears to be true, but when you look through binoculars the bottom 32 feet reappear. you can also test this with lighthouses. there are many videos of this on the internet.
>>696025192
> That means God isn't real, it's a myth...
Nice conclusion. Really makes you think, hmmm. . .
What I don't get is how can flat earth theorists explain how we the sun, moon, and other planets are all in the shape of a ball (thanks to gravity) yet expect us to believe here on earth were shaped like a frisbee because "hurr durr I can see something I shouldn't be able to see, therefor the earth MUST be flat"
The earth isn't a perfect sphere either, it's actually a very awkwardly shaped ball, so in some areas I wouldn't be surprised if you could see certain areas as opposed to if we were on a perfect sphere.
>>696025192
>God isn't real, it's a myth
correct
>>696025026
Good Bye
>>696025453
This.
It's nonsense that should have been left behind with tribes 3000 years ago
>>696025248
>>696025371
>let's bash a theory we don't understand the science behind
>just say its wrong cuz it wasn't taught at my publicly funded school
This is a country that teaches kids global warming isn't real. We're suppose to take their word for it?
>>696025311
until you look through a telescope. objects vanish at the focal point of perspective, and you never bothered to look further. all boats appear when you look through a telescope.
>>696025710
they really don't though
>>696025167
>>696025547
>globalist
>>696024215
thousands of satellites in orbit, dozens of people in space, and not one of them identifies our world as anything but spherical.
flat earthers, and religious believers. if time travel were possible i'd send them all back to the dark ages.
>>696025547
Nope. That's not an actual observation.
>>696025696
There is no science behind the flat theory myth.
have you ever seen a map of the earth. put it on a table in front of u. is it 3d??? no. problem solve.
>>696025585
Just because no one cared about you doesn't make other peoples religion false. More people believe in God than believe in you. So should we assume you don't exist? Or just chalk it up to you don't matter?
>>696025710
They don't desu senpai.
>>696025526
no the image is crisp once you use the telescope. it is not a mirage nor is it an elevated mirage. you can track ships leaving port with your telescope out to 20 miles, where they should not be seen. where does this become a 'mirage'?
>>696025595
Because you haven't done your research.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MGgDTbOfTY
List of examples of things that only make sense on a round earth and make no sense on a flat earth:
>Day and night
>Seasons
>Horizons
>Earthquakes and volcanos
>Gravity
>Earth's orbit around the sun
>Star positions
and so on
Checkmate
>>696025789
It's called a 'globe.'
>>696025820
We can say "there is zero evidence or reason for god"
>>696025920
None of this proves a thing.
>>696025756
yes it is, especially when you run the test by keeping the telescope trained on the landmark as you sail away, proving that ths image is not a mirage.
>>696025167
>chart supplied by globalist
Globalist lol
And this isn't a propaganda chart, that's practically an excel graph using math. Anyone can independently verify those numbers if they're not a fucking idiot
>inb4 trigonometry is propaganda
>>696026136
Doesn't happen
There is no "flat earth theory". A theory requires empirical evidence, and there is none.
>>696025984
also circumnavigation
To all flat earth theorist out there, if you truly believe it, then please mind telling me what's on the flip side of earth? Or why ships don't just fall off the edge when sailing? Is there some border around us that prevent anyone from falling off the edge of finding out? This whole theory is just rediculous. I seriously hope that people are just trolling and don't truly believe in this theory. It's like the mother will die in your sleep tonight posts. Obviously NOONE thinks their mom will really die but so many participate in it. I can only imagine this is just another form of trolling. Or at least I hope so.
>>696025696
you're right, flat earthers don't understand science
>>696025595
the lumpy ball theory is bullshit because the water should always be round as it flows freely around elevation changes. that is why we test water.
>>696024215
Objectively false.
>>696026244
see >>696025984
and weep
They don't trust the people in power. It's a good sign although it's a silly belief.
It's as stupid as young earth creationism
>>696024215
Pretty much the same as anyone who uses the words "crisis actor" in sequence.
Massive "...this fucking moron" eye roll and possible facepalm
>>696026090
right hut satellites you have never seen prove everything? what these flat water tests conclude is that water is flat, implying either flat earth OR globalists have lied about the scale of the round earth resulting in far less curvature than stated. saying no no no does not refute the central point directly, with evidence. it also doesn't explain the test results.
>>696026039
and there is zero evidence or reason for a flat earth too
>>696026570
One test proves nothing.
>>696025820
Religion isn't consistent around the world. Every part of the world has different fairy tails. Which one is right? Nevermind, they're not falsifiable and therefore not science and therefore not relevant for real questions like "What does our Earth look like"
Do I matter? Most certainly not.
Looks round.
>>696025675
>>696025453
>falling for bait this obvious
its dumber than mormonism
>itt americans are arguing the earth is round while everyone is taught its flat
'Merica, it's a great place of ignorance. You guys don't even believe in multi-regional evolution. Your Gov hates you people and makes you fit into their PC Agenda. Dumbass people.
>>696026136
Again, you did not try this : )
>>696026803
bait
do the tower shadow test while facetiming someone
>>696026872
>yelling bait somehow disproves what others believe
Once more this is public education at it's finest.
>>696024215
That not every retard should have access to the internet.
>>696026570
You're underestimating the scale of the earth.
>>696026803
0/10
daymn it sucks being a pilot
There is literally no evidence or logic in it. It should be dismissed outright.
>>696026988
omg i totally cant believe you actually believe this like that you know that it's true but it's not like wtf like you are making me so mad because you are so dumb and i know you completely believe this with all of your heart and soul.
YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE AOFMADOGMADOGNMADOFJ
I feel good about it
>>696027232
Reddit is leaking. Want to throw in a "reeeee"? Really drive it home?
why isnt gravity warped out at the edges of the earth?
Gravity doesn't allow a flat earth. It couldn't exist.
>>696027410
gravity doesnt exist
we accelerate through space at 9.8m/s/s
>an actual argument use by flat earthers
>>696025984
>List of examples of things that only make sense on a round earth and make no sense on a flat earth:
>>Day and night
flat earth is a sombrero hat shape
>>Seasons
sun moves from tropic of capricorn orbit and back
>>Horizons
perspective, in fact only a flat plane actually creates a geometric vanishing point
>>Earthquakes and volcanos
um no, you arent even making arguments
>>Gravity
every force has an equal and opposite force, yet you feel no pull opposite to the earth's spin. understanding the difference between centripetal force and centrifugal force is key
>>Earth's orbit around the sun
why does the sun change size if it's 90+ million miles away? any lensing or exposure argument also applies to the night sky, which is never distorted.
>>Star positions
actually this is how most flat earthers start, you arent even making arguments.
>and so on
so on? dont you mean circumnavigation? you do realize that using a compass to stay perpendicular to magnetic north would make you go in a circle around magnetic north, even if the plan was flat. it works like a compass. see you dont even make arguments for us to refute, it's all fallacious shit talking.
>Checkmate
no, you are a mockingbird
>>696027105
not when that chart is made using the official diameter of the earth, those are official numbers. the first mile is 8 inches of elevation change, but it squares after that as the curve continues. the mile after that is 32ish et cetera.
>>696027580
How do they account for inertia?
>>696027674
>flat earth is a sombrero hat shape
>>696024882
If the planet was flat then when you look at it from above certain nations would be farther from the center than others. Gravity pulls things toward the "center of gravity" which on a disk is the center of the disk. So places like Australia would be getting pulled horizontally toward the North Pole. They would need to build their cities at a nearly 90 degree angle to not "fall" into the north pole. Also gravity would simply pull the earth into a roughly round shape anyway.
>Nope, Earth is flat!!! Really. Gravity is just a made up concept put forward by the turbo-illuminai-ultrajews funded by the Bilderburg Group. The reason that we are "pulled" down at 9.8 m/s/s is because the Earth is actually being accelerated upwards at that speed constantly.
That is literally retarded, what force could possibly do that? How do explain the Earth not changing positions with regards to the sun and moon?
>Aetherial wind is the force that drives the Earth upwards. The Sun and moon a flat spotlights that are fixed into the Aether above the earth.
Then you would ask what the Aether is and you'd get more bullshit. Anyone who truly believes in the Flat Earth are:
1) Trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls.
2) literally psychotic people
3) excessively stupid people
4) Government sponsored false actors who make up and promote insane conspiracy theories so that conspiracy theorists who talk about legitimate conspiracies like MK ULTRA ("mind control" through use of drugs on US citizens) or Operation Northwoods (proposed operation for the US govt to conduct terrorist attacks against the USA under the false flag of Cuba to justify a war) are ignored and ridiculed like people who "believe" in the flat earth.
>>696027674
Good joke post.
>>696027232
I know for a fact it's true, but it's still just a theory. But there's no reason to get angry. People co-exist with ignorant people such as yourself all the time. Why do you think a Christian can live in an Atheistic society while ignoring all the requirements of being a Christian. Or how an Atheist can tolerate Agnostic theories/beliefs while ignoring their own fundamental beliefs. These are things that you learn when you get a good education. Not a public one because your parents didn't care about your well being.
>>696024215
why is earth flat but the moon and the sun round
>>696027754
that what is true?
>>696027674
>every force has an equal and opposite force
I don't think that's how that goes, fella.
>>696025167
prove it
oh wait you can't
>>696024215
Makes me laugh to how low we've gotten.
>facts for the public educated dimwits
1) The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Only NASA and other government “space agencies” show curvature in their fake CGI photos/videos.
2) The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / camera would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it.
3) The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and hurdling through infinite space then truly flat, consistently level surfaces would not exist here. But since Earth is in fact an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense.
4) Rivers run down to sea-level finding the easiest course, North, South, East, West and all other intermediary directions over the Earth at the same time. If Earth were truly a spinning ball then many of these rivers would be impossibly flowing uphill, for example the Mississippi in its 3000 miles would have to ascend 11 miles before reaching the Gulf of Mexico.
5) One portion of the Nile River flows for a thousand miles with a fall of only one foot. Parts of the West African Congo, according to the supposed inclination and movement of the ball-Earth, would be sometimes running uphill and sometimes down. This would also be the case for the Parana, Paraguay and other long rivers.
>>696024215
It's not true.
Done.
>>696027690
i dont think alot of them know what that means
>>696024215
>Flat Earth theory
4 real?
ok then give real facts ur imaginary magic friend/god exist
It's not a theory. It's a hypothesis.
>>696028004
6) If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference as NASA and modern astronomy claim, spherical trigonometry dictates the surface of all standing water must curve downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied by the square of the distance. This means along a 6 mile channel of standing water, the Earth would dip 6 feet on either end from the central peak. Every time such experiments have been conducted, however, standing water has proven to be perfectly level.
7) Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects. Canals, railways, bridges and tunnels for example are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles without any allowance for curvature.
8) The Suez Canal connecting the Mediterranean with the Red Sea is 100 miles long without any locks making the water an uninterrupted continuation of the two seas. When constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and water’s surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles.
>>696028004
The earth is much bigger than you seem to think it is.
>>696027674
So it's "sombrero Earth" now?
>>696028192
>>696028004
Dubay is a moron who knows nothing.
>>696028192
9) Engineer, W. Winckler was published in the Earth Review regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating, “As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this - that it is 8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of 600 feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of railway or canal, than of wasting our time trying to square the circle”
10) The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curving 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising over a mile, a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool.
>>696026634
there are hundreds of these flat water telescope videos on youtube. some are done with landmarks, other were done in canals that were cast over a True Level Datum (perpendicular to plumb for whole datum, no curvature). there are True Level datum canals that are multiple miles long with no water curvature in them. there are also telescope tests across lake michigan that prove the skyline is not a mirage.
but hey, you're a globalist so you don't know that this has been tested thousands of times before. we have sent cameras 121,000 feet into space (cameras without fisheye like shitty gopro) that show a flat plane. there are a dozen flat earth societies filled with thousands of civil engineers, airline pilots and their testimonials.
my favorite part of these convos is when globalists bring up NASA like it's a trump card, and we go on to show the leaked nasa footage of the blue marble being faked. or the faked challenger disaster. or the video of nasa using cgi and green screens to fake the ISS footage. or the fact that all the images of earth from space ars cgi composites, and nasa admits it. nasa shills are my favorite globalists.
Ya all gay niggas,the eat is a cube.
>>696028183
It's not a hypothesis, it's a hypotenuse
Flat Earth Theory is completely idiotic.
Then again, there are people believing that a giant invisible bearded old dude lives up in the sky and talks to them Inside their heads.
>>696028318
11) A surveyor and engineer of thirty years published in the Birmingham Weekly Mercury stated, “I am thoroughly acquainted with the theory and practice of civil engineering. However bigoted some of our professors may be in the theory of surveying according to the prescribed rules, yet it is well known amongst us that such theoretical measurements are INCAPABLE OF ANY PRACTICAL ILLUSTRATION. All our locomotives are designed to run on what may be regarded as TRUE LEVELS or FLATS. There are, of course, partial inclines or gradients here and there, but they are always accurately defined and must be carefully traversed. But anything approaching to eight inches in the mile, increasing as the square of the distance, COULD NOT BE WORKED BY ANY ENGINE THAT WAS EVER YET CONSTRUCTED. Taking one station with another all over England and Scotland, it may be stated that all the platforms are ON THE SAME RELATIVE LEVEL. The distance between Eastern and Western coasts of England may be set down as 300 miles. If the prescribed curvature was indeed as represented, the central stations at Rugby or Warwick ought to be close upon three miles higher than a chord drawn from the two extremities. If such was the case there is not a driver or stoker within the Kingdom that would be found to take charge of the train. We can only laugh at those of your readers who seriously give us credit for such venturesome exploits, as running trains round spherical curves. Horizontal curves on levels are dangerous enough, vertical curves would be a thousand times worse, and with our rolling stock constructed as at present physically impossible.”
12) The Manchester Ship Canal Company published in the Earth Review stated, “It is customary in Railway and Canal constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is not the practice in laying out Public Works to make allowances for the curvature of the earth
>>696026713
no source.
once you post source we will prove it is cgi, because nasa has already admitted thsg these shots are faked. thanks for trying though, good goyim
Explain how we wouldn't be able to see the fucking sun in Midwest USA if it was over fucking Nagasaki Japan at the same time
>>696027754
>1. there's no reason to get angry
cmon man that's serously the best you got? elementary level rustling.
>2. "Atheistic society". niqqa plz. you know 83 percent of Americans claim to be christian? You fuggin stoopid mang? I guess your good education forgot to teach you difference between imagination and fact.
lol you're just sad mang...
>>696028318
Why would the middle of the railway be high above sea level because of the curvature of the earth? That makes no fucking sense.
>>696028403
It's not a hypotenuse, it's a hypocrisy
>>696028460
13) In a 19th century French experiment by M. M. Biot and Arago a powerful lamp with good reflectors was placed on the summit of Desierto las Palmas in Spain and able to be seen all the way from Camprey on the Island of Iviza. Since the elevation of the two points were identical and the distance between covered nearly 100 miles, if Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, the light should have been more than 6600 feet, a mile and a quarter, below the line of sight!
14) The Lieutenant-Colonel Portlock experiment used oxy-hydrogen Drummond’s lights and heliostats to reflect the sun’s rays across stations set up across 108 miles of St. George’s Channel. If the Earth were actually a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Portlock’s light should have remained hidden under a mile and a half of curvature.
15) If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles in circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off into “outer space;” a pilot wishing to simply maintain their altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 mph, would have to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777 feet (over half a mile) every minute! Otherwise, without compensation, in one hour’s time the pilot would find themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected.
>>696028339
fuck you
People who subscribe to the theory of flat Earth should meditate on a tesseract so that they will feel more in touch with 3-D reality.
A visualization of the next quasi-dimensional step AFTER 3rd would help seat the chain of visualization and understanding.
Flat Earth is "conceptual drift".
Bad thinking.
>>696028467
How about this one?
>>696028571
It's not a hypocrisy, it's a hypothalamus
>>696028575 >dropping facts they can't dispute
16) The experiment known as “Airy’s Failure” proved that the stars move relative to a stationary Earth and not the other way around. By first filling a telescope with water to slow down the speed of light inside, then calculating the tilt necessary to get the starlight directly down the tube, Airy failed to prove the heliocentric theory since the starlight was already coming in the correct angle with no change necessary, and instead proved the geocentric model correct.
17) “Olber’s Paradox” states that if there were billions of stars which are suns the night sky would be filled completely with light. As Edgar Allen Poe said, “Were the succession of stars endless, then the background of the sky would present us a uniform luminosity, since there could exist absolutely no point, in all that background, at which would not exist a star.” In fact Olber’s “Paradox” is no more a paradox than George Airy’s experiment was a “failure.” Both are actually excellent refutations of the heliocentric spinning ball model.
18) The Michelson-Morley and Sagnac experiments attempted to measure the change in speed of light due to Earth’s assumed motion through space. After measuring in every possible different direction in various locations they failed to detect any significant change whatsoever, again proving the stationary geocentric model.
>>696028339
>we have sent cameras 121,000 feet into space (cameras without fisheye like shitty gopro) that show a flat plane.
lol no
>>696028575
15) Do you even gravity? Planes maintain a constant distance from the centre of the earth. Going 'straight' into space would be going up, so would require more upwards force
>>696028724
It's not a hypothalamus, it's a hypochondriac
>>696028793
he's copy pasting Eric Dubay's 200 "proofs"
yes, 200
>>696028763
19) Tycho Brahe famously argued against the heliocentric theory in his time, positing that if the Earth revolved around the Sun, the change in relative position of the stars after 6 months orbital motion could not fail to be seen. He argued that the stars should seem to separate as we approach and come together as we recede. In actual fact, however, after 190,000,000 miles of supposed orbit around the Sun, not a single inch of parallax can be detected in the stars, proving we have not moved at all.
20) If Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, vertically-fired cannonballs and other projectiles should fall significantly due west. In actual fact, however, whenever this has been tested, vertically-fired cannonballs shoot upwards an average of 14 seconds ascending, 14 seconds descending, and fall back to the ground no more than 2 feet away from the cannon, often directly back into the muzzle.
21) If the Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, helicopters and hot-air balloons should be able to simply hover over the surface of the Earth and wait for their destinations to come to them!
>>696028834
It's not a hypochondriac, it's a hypotension
>>696028787
>>we have sent cameras 121,000 feet into space (cameras without fisheye like shitty gopro) that show a flat plane.
>lol no
OH YES!
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eiIuq8-vhDQ
there are many many such tests
The Earth is flat and you've been lied to.
>>696028339
Explain day and night. If the earth was flat the sun would either always be visible, or would vanish from all sight for half the day.
>>696028874 >>itt white people do not understand science
22) If Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, during the Red Bull stratosphere dive, Felix Baumgartner, spending 3 hours ascending over New Mexico, should have landed 2500 miles West into the Pacific Ocean but instead landed a few dozen miles East of the take-off point.
23) Ball-believers often claim “gravity” magically and inexplicably drags the entire lower-atmosphere of the Earth in perfect synchronization up to some undetermined height where this progressively faster spinning atmosphere gives way to the non-spinning, non-gravitized, non-atmosphere of infinite vacuum space. Such non-sensical theories are debunked, however, by rain, fireworks, birds, bugs, clouds, smoke, planes and projectiles all of which would behave very differently if both the ball-Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards at 1000mph.
24) If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over 1000mph then North/South facing cannons should establish a control while East-firing cannonballs should fall significantly farther than all others while West-firing cannonballs should fall significantly closer. In actual fact, however, regardless of which direction cannons are fired, the distance covered is always the same.
25) If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning eastwards over 1000mph, then the average commercial airliner traveling 500mph should never be able to reach its Eastward destinations before they come speeding up from behind! Likewise Westward destinations should be arrived at thrice the speed, but this is not the case.
>>696024215
>implying its only a theory and not fact
>>696028577
>fuck you
not an argument. typical globalist, talking shit like a cia mockingbird
>>696029006
Show me some proof.
>>696028874
20) Inertia bro, the cannonball is already moving with the earth, as is the atmosphere it would be travelling through
21) see above
19) Parallax can be seen and is used to measure the distance of stars, but it's very small because they're extremely fucking far away
>>696028763
>filling a telescope with water to slow down the speed of light
>>696028997 >>how do airplanes fly!
26) Quoting “Heaven and Earth” by Gabrielle Henriet, “If flying had been invented at the time of Copernicus, there is no doubt that he would have soon realized that his contention regarding the rotation of the earth was wrong, on account of the relation existing between the speed of an aircraft and that of the earth’s rotation. If the earth rotates, as it is said, at 1,000 miles an hour, and a plane flies in the same direction at only 500 miles, it is obvious that its place of destination will be farther removed every minute. On the other hand, if flying took place in the direction opposite to that of the rotation, a distance of 1,500 miles would be covered in one hour, instead of 500, since the speed of the rotation is to be added to that of the plane. It could also be pointed out that such a flying speed of 1,000 miles an hour, which is supposed to be that of the earth’s rotation, has recently been achieved, so that an aircraft flying at this rate in the same direction as that of the rotation could not cover any ground at all. It would remain suspended in mid-air over the spot from which it took off, since both speeds are equal.”
27) If Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards over 1000mph, landing airplanes on such fast-moving runways which face all manner of directions North, South, East, West and otherwise would be practically impossible, yet in reality such fictional concerns are completely negligible.
>>696028917
It's not a hypotension, it's a hippopotamus
>>696028865
this could take a while
>>696028958
what the fuck
>>696029167
28) If the Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards over 1000mph, then clouds, wind and weather patterns could not casually and unpredictably go every which way, with clouds often travelling in opposing directions at varying altitudes simultaneously.
29) If the Earth and its atmosphere were constantly spinning Eastwards over 1000mph, this should somewhere somehow be seen, heard, felt or measured by someone, yet no one in history has ever experienced this alleged Eastward motion; meanwhile, however, we can hear, feel and experimentally measure even the slightest Westward breeze.
30) In his book “South Sea Voyages,” Arctic and Antarctic explorer Sir James Clarke Ross, described his experience on the night of November 27th, 1839 and his conclusion that the Earth must be motionless: “The sky being very clear … it enabled us to observe the higher stratum of clouds to be moving in an exactly opposite direction to that of the wind--a circumstance which is frequently recorded in our meteorological journal both in the north-east and south-east trades, and has also often been observed by former voyagers. Captain Basil Hall witnessed it from the summit of the Peak of Teneriffe; and Count Strzelechi, on ascending the volcanic mountain of Kiranea, in Owhyhee, reached at 4000 feet an elevation above that of the trade wind, and experienced the influence of an opposite current of air of a different hygrometric and thermometric condition … Count Strzelechi further informed me of the following seemingly anomalous circumstance--that at the height of 6000 feet he found the current of air blowing at right angles to both the lower strata, also of a different hygrometric and thermometric condition, but warmer than the inter-stratum. Such a state of the atmosphere is compatible only with the fact which other evidence has demonstrated, that the earth is at rest."
>>696024215
That theory only proves that your not at all intelligent.
Every single argument you have to "prove" the earth is flat only proves your stupidity
>>696029057
you're wrong, fuck off
>>696029299
31) Quoting “Zetetic Cosmogeny” Thomas Winships states: “Let ‘imagination’ picture to the mind what force air would have which was set in motion by a spherical body of 8,000 miles in diameter, which in one hour was spinning round 1,000 mph, rushing through space at 65,000 mph and gyrating across the heavens? Then let ‘conjecture’ endeavor to discover whether the inhabitants on such a globe could keep their hair on? If the earth-globe rotates on its axis at the terrific rate of 1,000 miles an hour, such an immense mass would of necessity cause a tremendous rush of wind in the space it occupied. The wind would go all one way, and anything like clouds which got ‘within the sphere of influence’ of the rotating sphere, would have to go the same way. The fact that the earth is at rest is proved by kite flying.”
32) If “gravity” is credited with being a force strong enough to hold the world’s oceans, buildings, people and atmosphere stuck to the surface of a rapidly spinning ball, then it is impossible for “gravity” to also simultaneously be weak enough to allow little birds, bugs, and planes to take-off and travel freely unabated in any direction.
33) If “gravity” is credited with being a force strong enough to curve the massive expanse of oceans around a globular Earth, it would be impossible for fish and other creatures to swim through such forcefully held water.
>>696024215
>>696026230
you talk alot for someone who cant even understand the picture in front of you.. there is a belt of ice around the world : antarctica
>>696029204
It's not a hippopotamus, it's a hippocampus
>>696024215
It reflected the extent of our knowledge about the universe hundreds of years ago. Then it didn't. Anybody who still believes it is a little silly. You can prove it's round with your own eyes or a bit of math.
>>696029407
34) Ship captains in navigating great distances at sea never need to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their calculations. Both Plane Sailing and Great Circle Sailing, the most popular navigation methods, use plane, not spherical trigonometry, making all mathematical calculations on the assumption that the Earth is perfectly flat. If the Earth were in fact a sphere, such an errant assumption would lead to constant glaring inaccuracies. Plane Sailing has worked perfectly fine in both theory and practice for thousands of years, however, and plane trigonometry has time and again proven more accurate than spherical trigonometry in determining distances across the oceans.
35) If the Earth were truly a globe, then every line of latitude south of the equator would have to measure a gradually smaller and smaller circumference the farther South travelled. If, however, the Earth is an extended plane, then every line of latitude south of the equator should measure a gradually larger and larger circumference the farther South travelled. The fact that many captains navigating south of the equator assuming the globular theory have found themselves drastically out of reckoning, moreso the farther South travelled, testifies to the fact that the Earth is not a ball.
>>696029334
Poor sheep. l feel sorry for you.
>>696028997
>>696028004
>>696028192
>>696028318
IN these posts, a dumb ass copy pasta wana be troll that can't even back up his claims with valid science.
>>696027674
>why does the sun change size if it's 90+ million miles away? any lensing or exposure argument also applies to the night sky, which is never distorted.
Delicious bait. I'll take a nibble.
The apparent distortion of the Sun or Moon in size is an optical illusion. Ever looked into a snowglobe? Or out of one?
Take your thumb, hold it up to The Moon when it has first risen. Hold your thumb up, notice how big it looks to your thumb. Later when the moon is in midsky, do it again. You'll notice that The Moon is the same size. Your brain is fucking up how large it is because there's trees and buildings nearby making your brain overcompensate by making it appear larger than it really is due to the angle. Same with The Sun.
>>696029449
So if antartica is around the edge, why is its circumference much smaller than is shown on that make believe map?
I live in an elevated spot in eastern ireland if the earth is flat then why cant i see the UK?
>>696029473
It's not a hippocampus, it's a Hippocrates
>>696028958
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-4J_KKKmRw
>>696029449
There is no evidence of that.
>>696027775
Nigga knows the good questions
>>696029534
36) During Captain James Clark Ross’s voyages around the Antarctic circumference, he often wrote in his journal perplexed at how they routinely found themselves out of accordance with their charts, stating that they found themselves an average of 12-16 miles outside their reckoning every day, later on further south as much as 29 miles.
37) Lieutenant Charles Wilkes commanded a United States Navy exploration expedition to the Antarctic from 1838 to 1842, and in his journals also mentioned being consistently east of his reckoning, sometimes over 20 miles in less than 18 hours.
38) To quote Reverend Thomas Milner, “In the southern hemisphere, navigators to India have often fancied themselves east of the Cape when still west, and have been driven ashore on the African coast, which, according to their reckoning, lay behind them. This misfortune happened to a fine frigate, the Challenger, in 1845. How came Her Majesty’s Ship ‘Conqueror,’ to be lost? How have so many other noble vessels, perfectly sound, perfectly manned, perfectly navigated, been wrecked in calm weather, not only in dark night, or in a fog, but in broad daylight and sunshine - in the former case upon the coasts, in the latter, upon sunken rocks - from being ‘out of reckoning?’” The simple answer is that Earth is not a ball.
>>696024215
honestly, how does it affect me in my day to day life? i can't see that it ever has, so i don't really care. for all i care the moon could be made of cheese and the stars just points of light on the inside of a large globe. it could all be a collective delusion....either way, it is still beautiful and the moon is making me hungry for a grilled cheese sammich.
>>696028986
this is old news. pic related, shadow cast by center bulge. seasons explained by change in suns orbit from tropic of cancer to tropic of capricorn.
Gravity would collapse a flat world.
>>696027775
nobody got an answer to this because the theory is retarded.
>/thread
>>696028865
90% of what he posted is debunked by flawed mathematics and his lack of understanding of gravity. It's incredible, truly incredible.
>>696029774
That orbit makes absolutely zero sense.
>>696029768
>sammich
kill yourself
>>696029752
When you realized you've been lied to all along.
39) Practical distance measurements taken from “The Australian Handbook, Almanack, Shippers’ and Importers’ Directory” state that the straight line distance between Sydney and Nelson is 1550 statute miles. Their given difference in longitude is 22 degrees 2’14”. Therefore if 22 degrees 2’14” out of 360 is 1550 miles, the entirety would measure 25,182 miles. This is not only larger than the ball-Earth is said to be at the equator, but a whole 4262 miles greater than it would be at Sydney’s southern latitude on a globe of said proportions.
40) From near Cape Horn, Chile to Port Philip in Melbourne, Australia the distance is 10,500 miles, or 143 degrees of longitude away. Factoring in the remaining degrees to 360 makes for a total distance of 26,430 miles around this particular latitude, which is over 1500 miles wider than Earth is supposed to be at the equator, and many more thousands of miles wider than it is supposed to be at such Southern latitudes.
41) Similar calculations made from the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa to Melbourne, Australia at an average latitude of 35.5 degrees South, have given an approximate figure of over 25,000 miles, which is again equal to or greater than the Earth’s supposed greatest circumference at the equator. Calculations from Sydney, Australia to Wellington, New Zealand at an average of 37.5 degrees South have given an approximate circumference of 25,500 miles, greater still! According to the ball-Earth theory, the circumference of the Earth at 37.5 degrees Southern latitude should be only 19,757 statute miles, almost six thousand miles less than such practical measurements.
>>696029774
'center bulge'? So the earth isn't flat, it's an upside bowl? Why don't the oceans all run to the edge?
Flat earthers have no proof of their own so they just nitpick round earth proofs.
Quote from: kramerr on September 16, 2009, 03:25:04 PM
I live on the West coast of north America and at sunrise I called up my friend who lives 2000 miles away on the East coast of North America. I could just see the sun starting to come over the horizon, but for my friend the sun was much higher in the sky and casting full daylight. If we are both standing on the same flat surface why does the sun appear to be in different positions?
It's not that I don't believe you but get back to us once you've scanned and shown us your phone bill and the record of such a call (the morning of September 16, 2009) appears. For the sake of privacy black our your friend's telephone number. We prefer to verify such claims.
This was posted on a forum of some bitch replying to a guy. This is literally how retarded flat earthers are. "Nah I don't trust you fam, the government is covering up by paying your friend to lie to you lelellee"
>>696028004
>2) The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / camera would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it.
Delicious bait.
https://youtu.be/7f-K-XnHi9I?t=17
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lu3rxI7qGRM
>>696029910
THIS
H
I
S
>>696028339
Flat earth is a ridiculously minority fringe movement, sorry.
>>696029903
42) In the ball-Earth model Antarctica is an ice continent which covers the bottom of the ball from 78 degrees South latitude to 90 and is therefore not more than 12,000 miles in circumference. Many early explorers including Captian Cook and James Clark Ross, however, in attempting Antarctic circumnavigation took 3 to 4 years and clocked 50-60,000 miles around. The British ship Challenger also made an indirect but complete circumnavigation of Antarctica traversing 69,000 miles. This is entirely inconsistent with the ball model.
43) If Earth was a ball there are several flights in the Southern hemisphere which would have their quickest, straightest path over the Antarctic continent such as Santiago, Chile to Sydney, Australia. Instead of taking the shortest, quickest route in a straight line over Antarctica, all such flights detour all manner of directions away from Antarctica instead claiming the temperatures too cold for airplane travel! Considering the fact that there are plenty of flights to/from/over Antarctica, and NASA claims to have technology keeping them in conditions far colder (and far hotter) than any experienced on Earth, such an excuse is clearly just an excuse, and these flights aren’t made because they are impossible.
44) If Earth was a ball, and Antarctica was too cold to fly over, the only logical way to fly from Sydney to Santiago would be a straight shot over the Pacific staying in the Southern hemisphere the entire way. Re-fueling could be done in New Zealand or other Southern hemisphere destinations along the way if absolutely necessary. In actual fact, however, Santiago-Sydney flights go into the Northern hemisphere making stop-overs at LAX and other North American airports before continuing back down to the Southern hemisphere. Such ridiculously wayward detours make no sense on the globe but make perfect sense and form nearly straight lines when shown on a flat Earth map.
>>696024215
Isn't it a 4chan prank?
>>696029964
inb4 "CGI!!!"
>>696028004
>3) The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and hurdling through infinite space then truly flat, consistently level surfaces would not exist here. But since Earth is in fact an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense.
what is tides
Flat earthers are worse than chemtrail theorists
>>696028874
How do you explain the different pattern long exposure photographs of the night sky show, depending on where they are taken? You get almost straight lines at the equator and a lot of circles at the poles. How is that?
>>696030026
45) On a ball-Earth, Johannesburg, South Africa to Perth, Australia should be a straight shot over the Indian Ocean with convenient re-fueling possibilities on Mauritus or Madagascar. In actual practice, however, most Johannesburg to Perth flights curiously stop over either in Dubai, Hong Kong or Malaysia all of which make no sense on the ball, but are completely understandable when mapped on a flat Earth.
46) On a ball-Earth Cape Town, South Africa to Buenos Aries, Argentina should be a straight shot over the Atlantic following the same line of latitude across, but instead every flight goes to connecting locations in the Northern hemisphere first, stopping over anywhere from London to Turkey to Dubai. Once again these make absolutely no sense on the globe but are completely understandable options when mapped on a flat Earth.
47) On a ball-Earth Johannesburg, South Africa to Sao Paolo, Brazil should be a quick straight shot along the 25th Southern latitude, but instead nearly every flight makes a re-fueling stop at the 50th degree North latitude in London first! The only reason such a ridiculous stop-over works in reality is because the Earth is flat.
48) On a ball-Earth Santiago, Chile to Johannesburg, South Africa should be an easy flight all taking place below the Tropic of Capricorn in the Southern hemisphere, yet every listed flight makes a curious re-fueling stop in Senegal near the Tropic of Cancer in the North hemisphere first! When mapped on a flat Earth the reason why is clear to see, however, Senegal is actually directly in a straight-line path half-way between the two.
>>696029775
Gravity does not exist.
>>696030110
49) If Earth were a spinning ball heated by a Sun 93 million miles away, it would be impossible to have simultaneously sweltering summers in Africa while just a few thousand miles away bone-chilling frozen Arctic/Antarctic winters experiencing little to no heat from the Sun whatsoever. If the heat from the Sun traveled 93,000,000 miles to the Sahara desert, it is absurd to assert that another 4,000 miles (0.00004%) further to Antarctica would completely negate such sweltering heat resulting in such drastic differences.
50) If the Earth were truly a globe, the Arctic and Antarctic polar regions and areas of comparable latitude North and South of the equator should share similar conditions and characteristics such as comparable temperatures, seasonal changes, length of daylight, plant and animal life. In reality, however, the Arctic/Antarctic regions and areas of comparable latitude North/South of the equator differ greatly in many ways entirely inconsistent with the ball model and entirely consistent with the flat model.
51) Antarctica is by far the coldest place on Earth with an average annual temperature of approximately -57 degrees Fahrenheit, and a record low of -135.8! The average annual temperature at the North Pole, however, is a comparatively warm 4 degrees. Throughout the year, temperatures in the Antarctic vary less than half the amount at comparable Arctic latitudes. The Northern Arctic region enjoys moderately warm summers and manageable winters, whereas the Southern Antarctic region never even warms enough to melt the perpetual snow and ice. On a tilting, wobbling, ball-Earth spinning uniformly around the Sun, Arctic and Antarctic temperatures and seasons should not vary so greatly.
>>696030150
*flies away* oh wow
How many countries that hate the usa have been to space. Iran north Korea Russia Syria China almost every single nation. Even central African countries launch satellites and not one has came back. The hundreds of non government space agencies around the world too.
>>696030150
I'm going to pretend you did not say something as completely retarded as this, then repeat that gravity doesn't allow a flat world, the shape would collapse.
52) Iceland at 65 degrees North latitude is home to 870 species of native plants and abundant various animal life. Compare this with the Isle of Georgia at just 54 degrees South latitude where there are only 18 species of native plants and animal life is almost non-existent. The same latitude as Canada or England in the North where dense forests of various tall trees abound, the infamous Captain Cook wrote of Georgia that he was unable to find a single shrub large enough to make a toothpick! Cook wrote, “Not a tree was to be seen. The lands which lie to the south are doomed by nature to perpetual frigidness - never to feel the warmth of the sun’s rays; whose horrible and savage aspect I have not words to describe. Even marine life is sparse in certain tracts of vast extent, and the sea-bird is seldom observed flying over such lonely wastes. The contrasts between the limits of organic life in Arctic and Antarctic zones is very remarkable and significant.”
53) At places of comparable latitude North and South, the Sun behaves very differently than it would on a spinning ball Earth but precisely how it should on a flat Earth. For example, the longest summer days North of the equator are much longer than those South of the equator, and the shortest winter days North of the equator are much shorter than the shortest South of the equator. This is inexplicable on a uniformly spinning, wobbling ball Earth but fits exactly on the flat model with the Sun traveling circles over and around the Earth from Tropic to Tropic.
These people need to play kerbal space program to see how dumb they are
>>696028690
faked. the earth image is pasted over it, but it's also the same earth image with the same cloud patterns and shapes used by nasa for decades. they realease the same picture ad infinitum, no one realizes it. thd bbc has a documentary on nasa faking these shots, because nasa accidentally sent tapes from the apollo missions to the wrong person. they blot out the sun from all the windows, leaving a pice of the earth behind the round port hole. they then tell you that thd round edge of the window is the round planet, and nobody ever noticed that there were no stars in these photos.
the documentary is on youtube, bbc fake blue marble or something. old news
54) At places of comparable latitude North and South, dawn and dusk happen very differently than they would on a spinning ball, but precisely how they should on a flat Earth. In the North dawn and dusk come slowly and last far longer than in the South where they come and go very quickly. Certain places in the North twilight can last for over an hour while at comparable Southern latitudes within a few minutes the sunlight completely disappears. This is inexplicable on a uniformly spinning, wobbling ball Earth but is exactly what is expected on a flat Earth with the Sun traveling faster, wider circles over the South and slower, narrower circles over the North.
55) If the Sun circles over and around the Earth every 24 hours, steadily travelling from Tropic to Tropic every 6 months, it follows that the Northern, central region would annually receive far more heat and sunlight than the Southern circumferential region. Since the Sun must sweep over the larger Southern region in the same 24 hours it has to pass over the smaller Northern region, its passage must necessarily be proportionally faster as well. This perfectly explains the differences in Arctic/Antarctic temperatures, seasons, length of daylight, plant and animal life; this is why the Antarctic morning dawn and evening twilight are very abrupt compared with the North; and this explains why many midsummer Arctic nights the Sun does not set at all!
>>696030350
Ok.
Here's a slight problem with your claim.
That's not a NASA photograph.
>>696030362
56) The “Midnight Sun” is an Arctic phenomenon occurring annually during the summer solstice where for several days straight an observer significantly far enough north can watch the Sun traveling circles over-head, rising and falling in the sky throughout the day, but never fully setting for upwards of 72+ hours! If the Earth were actually a spinning globe revolving around the Sun, the only place such a phenomenon as the Midnight Sun could be observed would be at the poles. Any other vantage point from 89 degrees latitude downwards could never, regardless of any tilt or inclination, see the Sun for 24 hours straight. To see the Sun for an entire revolution on a spinning globe at a point other than the poles, you would have to be looking through miles and miles of land and sea for part of the revolution!
57) The establishment claims the Midnight Sun IS experienced in Antarctica but they conveniently do not have any uncut videos showing this, nor do they allow independent explorers to travel to Antarctica during the winter solstice to verify or refute these claims. Conversely, there are dozens of uncut videos publicly available showing the Arctic Midnight Sun and it has been verified beyond any shadow of a doubt.
Technically if the earth was flat and incorporate that, somehow, there is gravity on a flat surface, then the earth would get steeper and steeper until you get to the edge, and just fall off.
>>696029951
>It's not that I don't believe you
You're either a liar or stupid. Back to school with you, summer.
>>696029648
It's not a Hippocrates, it's a hipopanonomous
>>696024215
If the earth is flat why cant i fall off it?
>>696030533
>responding to a seven year old post from a different website
Pilot here, the Earth is not flat.
/thread
Where's the edge?
>>696030150
Jump off a cliff and test this.
58) The Royal Belgian Geographical Society in their “Expedition Antarctique Belge,” recorded that during the most severe part of the Antarctic winter, from 71 degrees South latitude onwards, the sun sets on May 17th and is not seen above the horizon again until July 21st! This is completely at odds with the ball-Earth theory, but easily explained by the flat-Earth model. The Midnight Sun is seen from high altitudes in extreme Northern latitudes during Arctic summer because the Sun, at its inner-most cycle, is circling tightly enough around the polar center that it remains visible above the horizon for someone at such a vantage point. Likewise, in extreme Southern latitudes during Arctic summer, the Sun completely disappears from view for over 2 months because there at the Northern Tropic, at the inner-most arc of its boomerang journey, the Sun is circling the Northern center too tightly to be seen from the Southern circumference.
59) Quoting Gabrielle Henriet, “The theory of the rotation of the earth may once and for all be definitely disposed of as impracticable by pointing out the following inadvertence. It is said that the rotation takes twenty-four hours and that its speed is uniform, in which case, necessarily, days and nights should have an identical duration of twelve hours each all the year round. The sun should invariably rise in the morning and set in the evening at the same hours, with the result that it would be the equinox every day from the 1st of January to the 31st of December. One should stop and reflect on this before saying that the earth has a movement of rotation. How does the system of gravitation account for the seasonal variations in the lengths of days and nights if the earth rotates at a uniform speed in twenty-four hours!?”
>>696030110
>45) On a ball-Earth, Johannesburg, South Africa to Perth, Australia should be a straight shot over the Indian Ocean with convenient re-fueling possibilities on Mauritus or Madagascar. In actual practice, however, most Johannesburg to Perth flights curiously stop over either in Dubai, Hong Kong or Malaysia all of which make no sense on the ball, but are completely understandable when mapped on a flat Earth.
That's so they can stay close to airports rather than fly over dangerous (MH 370) open water. Not because the earth is all bendy or something.
>>696029298
>what the fuck
that is what we are saying! What the fuck!
of course hundreds of flat waters tests, landmark vanishing test, and elevation tests are being done. people say, "hurr durr the earth is round because i was told so! hurr durr any idiot can test this and see!"
fine, so we test it. then you say, "What the fuck! This should be impossible!" and get yelled at by CIA mockingbirds who talk shit instead of refuting the central point with a logical argument. globalists will shit talk and pretend this counts as discourse.
I've alway asked myself what flat earthers think of other planets, suns, solar systems and so on. Are they all flat too and incidentally all facing us? Are they spherical? Hos would one explain the rings of saturn? Has no one ever been to the "end of the world"? What prevents the moon from falling onto us, if orbits aren't real? Where do things fall to when they go beyond the end of the world? How do clouds stay withing the boundaries of the world's end? If they don't, when will we run out of water?
Please answer at least a few, it's so rare to come across one of you guys and usually they're absolutely closed to any discussion or questions.
>>696030217
>49) If Earth were a spinning ball heated by a Sun 93 million miles away, it would be impossible to have simultaneously sweltering summers in Africa while just a few thousand miles away bone-chilling frozen Arctic/Antarctic winters experiencing little to no heat from the Sun whatsoever. If the heat from the Sun traveled 93,000,000 miles to the Sahara desert, it is absurd to assert that another 4,000 miles (0.00004%) further to Antarctica would completely negate such sweltering heat resulting in such drastic differences.
fuck this shit is hilarious. you fuckin moron
>>696030679
60) Anyone can prove the sea-horizon perfectly straight and the entire Earth perfectly flat using nothing more than a level, tripods and a wooden plank. At any altitude above sea-level, simply fix a 6-12 foot long, smooth, leveled board edgewise upon tripods and observe the skyline from eye-level behind it. The distant horizon will always align perfectly parallel with the upper edge of the board. Furthermore, if you move in a half-circle from one end of the board to the other whilst observing the skyline over the upper edge, you will be able to trace a clear, flat 10-20 miles depending on your altitude. This would be impossible if the Earth were a globe 25,000 miles in circumference; the horizon would align over the center of the board but then gradually, noticeably decline towards the extremities. Just ten miles on each side would necessitate an easily visible curvature of 66.6 feet from each end to the center.
61) If the Earth were actually a big ball 25,000 miles in circumference, the horizon would be noticeably curved even at sea-level, and everything on or approaching the horizon would appear to tilt backwards slightly from your perspective. Distant buildings along the horizon would all look like leaning towers of Piza falling away from the observer. A hot-air balloon taking off then drifting steadily away from you, on a ball-Earth would slowly and constantly appear to lean back more and more the farther away it flew, the bottom of the basket coming gradually into view as the top of the balloon disappears from sight. In reality, however, buildings, balloons, trees, people, anything and everything at right angles to the ground/horizon remains so regardless the distance or height of the observer.
>>696030723
the video was not what I was expecting, I will admit
>>696030745
photoshopped
>>696030292
Holy shit. I made that image 7 or 8 fucking years ago.
Thank you for saving it.
>>696030498
Did you just admit to a round earth with 56?
How the hell could a flat earth possibly form? Every other planet and moon is round.
You can see the sunset twice; once at the bottom of the tallest building in the world and once at the top. This proves the world is round and anyone can do it.
>Inb4 no it doesn't
It really does, if that stayed consitant with the theory it would mean either the world goes through periods of complete darkness or we inhabit both sides of a flat earth. Both of which obviously aren't the case.
>>696028865
copernicus wrote a 900 page book to prove the round earth, and actually avoided making a scientific proof all the way to the end. this work, which has never been verified with the scientific method, is cited as proof of a ball earth.
Why is the equator hotter if the earth is flat?
>>696030800
>how airplanes really work
62) Samuel Rowbotham’s experiments at the Old Bedford Level proved conclusively the canal’s water to be completely flat over a 6 mile stretch. First he stood in the canal with his telescope held 8 inches above the surface of the water, then his friend in a boat with a 5 foot tall flag sailed the 6 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference the 6 mile stretch of water should have comprised an arc exactly 6 feet high in the middle, so the entire boat and flag should have ultimately disappeared, when in fact the entire boat and flag remained visible at the same height for the entire journey.
63) In a second experiment Dr. Rowbotham affixed flags 5 feet high along the shoreline, one at every mile marker. Then using his telescope mounted at 5 feet just behind the first flag looked over the tops of all 6 flags which lined up in a perfectly straight line. If the Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference the flags should have progressively dipped down after the first establishing line of sight, the second would have descended 8 inches, 32 inches for the third, 6 feet for the fourth, 10 feet 8 inches for the fifth, and 16 feet 8 inches for the sixth.
>>696030881
He did kekz
Good find attention anon
>>696030921
we knew the earth was round all the way back in ancient greecce
>>696030881
>>696030995
>>itt publicly educate americans cannot comprehend what they read so they see what they want
>>696030150
then why do we fall? so Bruce can learn to pick himself up?
>>696029346
not an argument
>>696024215
I feel like i should tell the people who believes in that bullshit to seek special treatment.
>>696024215
lol you might as well hang yourself now if you believe this
>>696030986
4) Quoting “Earth Not a Globe!” by Samuel Rowbotham, “It is known that the horizon at sea, whatever distance it may extend to the right and left of the observer on land, always appears as a straight line. The following experiment has been tried in various parts of the country. At Brighton, on a rising ground near the race course, two poles were fixed in the earth six yards apart, and directly opposite the sea. Between these poles a line was tightly stretched parallel to the horizon. From the center of the line the view embraced not less than 20 miles on each side making a distance of 40 miles. A vessel was observed sailing directly westwards; the line cut the rigging a little above the bulwarks, which it did for several hours or until the vessel had sailed the whole distance of 40 miles. The ship coming into view from the east would have to ascend an inclined plane for 20 miles until it arrived at the center of the arc, whence it would have to descend for the same distance. The square of 20 miles multiplied by 8 inches gives 266 feet as the amount the vessel would be below the line at the beginning and at the end of the 40 miles.”
>>696031137
neither is flat earth, it has no evidence for it and makes no sense in science
the world we observe doesn't align with it
>>696031109
Nice try troll, next time KYS
if earth is flat how do you explain climate belts ?
>>696031192
65) Also Quoting Dr. Rowbotham, “On the shore near Waterloo, a few miles to the north of Liverpool, a good telescope was fixed, at an elevation of 6 feet above the water. It was directed to a large steamer, just leaving the River Mersey, and sailing out to Dublin. Gradually the mast-head of the receding vessel came nearer to the horizon, until, at length, after more than four hours had elapsed, it disappeared. The ordinary rate of sailing of the Dublin steamers was fully eight miles an hour; so that the vessel would be, at least, thirty-two miles distant when the mast-head came to the horizon. The 6 feet of elevation of the telescope would require three miles to be deducted for convexity, which would leave twenty-nine miles, the square of which, multiplied by 8 inches, gives 560 feet; deducting 80 feet for the height of the main-mast, and we find that, according to the doctrine of rotundity, the mast-head of the outward bound steamer should have been 480 feet below the horizon. Many other experiments of this kind have been made upon sea-going steamers, and always with results entirely incompatible with the theory that the earth is a globe.”
>>696030964
this
>>696030539
It's not a hipopanonamous, it's a Hippopopalous
>>696030745
Is this supposed to prove something?
>>696031243
Jesus loves the equator more :^)
>>696029679
>>696028958
Misleading videos with wrong conclusions.
>>696031292
6) Dr. Rowbotham conducted several other experiments using telescopes, spirit levels, sextants and “theodolites,” special precision instruments used for measuring angles in horizontal or vertical planes. By positioning them at equal heights aimed at each other successively he proved over and over the Earth to be perfectly flat for miles without a single inch of curvature. His findings caused quite a stir in the scientific community and thanks to 30 years of his efforts, the shape of the Earth became a hot topic of debate around the turn of the nineteenth century.
67) The distance across the Irish Sea from the Isle of Man’s Douglas Harbor to Great Orm’s Head in North Wales is 60 miles. If the Earth was a globe then the surface of the water between them would form a 60 mile arc, the center towering 1944 feet higher than the coastlines at either end. It is well-known and easily verifiable, however, that on a clear day, from a modest altitude of 100 feet, the Great Orm’s Head is visible from Douglas Harbor. This would be completely impossible on a globe of 25,000 miles. Assuming the 100 foot altitude causes the horizon to appear approximately 13 miles off, the 47 miles remaining means the Welsh coastline should still fall an impossible 1472 feet below the line of sight!
68) The Philadelphia skyline is clearly visible from Apple Pie Hill in the New Jersey Pine Barrens 40 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, factoring in the 205 foot elevation of Apple Pie Hill, the Philly skyline should remain well-hidden beyond 335 feet of curvature.
>>696028874
>21) If the Earth were truly constantly spinning Eastwards at over 1000mph, helicopters and hot-air balloons should be able to simply hover over the surface of the Earth and wait for their destinations to come to them!
Yes, just like jumping out of a moving car/train will result in you landing on your feet without problems.
You should try.
>>696029576
>>why does the sun change size if it's 90+ million miles away? any lensing or exposure argument also applies to the night sky, which is never distorted.
>Delicious bait. I'll take a nibble.
>The apparent distortion of the Sun or Moon in size is an optical illusion. Ever looked into a snowglobe? Or out of one?
>Take your thumb, hold it up to The Moon when it has first risen. Hold your thumb up, notice how big it looks to your thumb. Later when the moon is in midsky, do it again. You'll notice that The Moon is the same size. Your brain is fucking up how large it is because there's trees and buildings nearby making your brain overcompensate by making it appear larger than it really is due to the angle. Same with The Sun.
except this has been debunked with TRIPOD PHOTOGRAPHS! both the sun and moon change size. dont use your fucking thumb, that isnt a real test.
>>696031412
69) The New York City skyline is clearly visible from Harriman State Park’s Bear Mountain 60 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, viewing from Bear Mountain’s 1,283 foot summit, the Pythagorean Theorem determining distance to the horizon being 1.23 times the square root of the height in feet, the NYC skyline should be invisible behind 170 feet of curved Earth.
70) From Washington’s Rock in New Jersey, at just a 400 foot elevation, it is possible on a clear day to see the skylines of both New York and Philadelphia in opposite directions at the same time covering a total distance of 120 miles! If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, both of these skylines should be hidden behind over 800 feet of Earth’s curvature.
71) It is often possible to see the Chicago skyline from sea-level 60 miles away across Lake Michigan. In 2015 after photographer Joshua Nowicki photographed this phenomenon several news channels quickly claimed his picture to be a “superior mirage,” an atmospheric anomaly caused by temperature inversion. While these certainly do occur, the skyline in question was facing right-side up and clearly seen unlike a hazy illusory mirage, and on a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference should be 2,400 feet below the horizon.
>>696030498
#57, I guess Google is broken for you. Let me help
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2nc6nhtaEt4
>>696031431
They don't change size
>be me
>be today
>click on flat earth theory thread
>scroll all the way down without reading anything
This whole thread is stupid.
>click Catalog
>>696031592
This isn't your first post in the thread.
>>696024215
It would sure make pogo sticks hazardous, wouldn't it? I mean, bounce too hard, and whammy - right through the disk you go, falling endlessly through space, never to return or see your ex girlfriend again.
>>696031506
72) October 16, 1854 the Times newspaper reported the Queen’s visit to Great Grimsby from Hull recording they were able to see the 300 foot tall dock tower from 70 miles away. On a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference, factoring their 10 foot elevation above the water and the tower’s 300 foot height, at 70 miles away the dock tower should have remained an entire 2,600 feet below the horizon.
73) In 1872 Capt. Gibson and crewmates, sailing the ship “Thomas Wood” from China to London, reported seeing the entirety of St. Helena Island on a clear day from 75 miles away. Factoring in their height during measurement on a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference, it was found the island should have been 3,650 feet below their line of sight.
74) From Genoa, Italy at a height of just 70 feet above sea-level, the island of Gorgona can often be seen 81 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Gorgona should be hidden beyond 3,332 feet of curvature.
75) From Genoa, Italy at a height of just 70 feet above sea-level, the island of Corsica can often be seen 99 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Corsica should fall 5,245 feet, almost an entire mile below the horizon.
76) From Genoa, Italy 70 feet above sea-level, the island of Capraia 102 miles away can often be seen as well. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Capraia should always remain hidden behind 5,605 feet, over a mile of supposed curvature.
77) Also from Genoa, on bright clear days, the island of Elba can be seen an incredible 125 miles away! If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Elba should be forever invisible behind 8770 feet of curvature.
>>696030723
stop tying to indoctrinate people
>>696030894
You don't think these detriments to society thought the rest of them were flat as well right?
>>696028958
You aren't high enough to show the curvature there.
>>696031137
Awfully ethnocentric, putting the northern hemisphere on top. What if Antarctica is the center? Or Uluru, as the Australian aborigines believe?
>>696029716
inb4 admiral byrd leaked interview
inb4 Byrd's flat earth map is used by the UN, the USGS, and two dozen international maritime institutions. oh and the USGS has declared the earth is flat, and any civil engineer can tell you that a train over 1 mile long faces a curvature of 8 inches for the first mile, and 32 for the second.
this slope angle is so extreme that no locomotive engine could scale it. civil engineers lay a hundreds of mile of track on a flat plane, and they talk about this adamantly for no reason huh?
78) From Anchorage, Alaska at an elevation of 102 feet, on clear days Mount Foraker can be seen with the naked eye 120 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Mount Foraker’s 17,400 summit should be leaning back away from the observer covered by 7,719 feet of curved Earth. In reality, the entire mountain can be quite easily seen standing straight from base to summit.
79) From Anchorage, Alaska at an elevation of 102 feet, Mount McKinley can be seen with the naked eye from 130 miles away. If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference, Mount McKinley’s 20,320 foot summit should be leaning back away from the observer and almost half covered by 9,220 feet of curved Earth. In reality, however, the entire mountain can be quite easily seen standing straight from base to summit.
80) In Chambers’ Journal, February 1895, a sailor near Mauritius in the Indian Ocean reported having seen a vessel which turned out to be an incredible 200 miles away! The incident caused much heated debate in nautical circles at the time, gaining further confirmation in Aden, Yemen where another witness reported seeing a missing Bombay steamer from 200 miles away. He correctly stated the precise appearance, location and direction of the steamer all later corroborated and confirmed correct by those onboard. Such sightings are absolutely inexplicable if Earth were actually a ball 25,000 miles around, as ships 200 miles distant would have to fall approximately 5 miles below line of sight!
81) The distance from which various lighthouse lights around the world are visible at sea far exceeds what could be found on a ball-Earth 25,000 miles in circumference. For example, the Dunkerque Light in southern France at an altitude of 194 feet is visible from a boat (10 feet above sea-level) 28 miles away. Spherical trigonometry dictates that the Earth was a globe with the given curvature of 8 inches per mile squared, light should be hidden 190 feet below the horizon.
How do you flat earth dumb fucks think time zones happened?
This is the question I never had answered by any of these retards. Only one time someone tried persuading me that a flat surface doesn't get lit by sunlight at once so I showed him with a frisbee and a flashlight. He then called me a brainwashed idiot and left.
>>696031431
OK use the hole in notebook paper. It doesn't change size you retard.
Also explain time zones.
>>696031957
82) The Port Nicholson Light in New Zealand is 420 feet above sea-level and visible from 35 miles away where it should be 220 feet below the horizon.
83) The Egerö Light in Norway is 154 feet above high-water and visible from 28 statute miles where it should be 230 feet below the horizon.
84) The Light at Madras, on the Esplanade, is 132 feet high and visible from 28 miles away, where it should be 250 feet below the line of sight.
85) The Cordonan Light on the west coast of France is 207 feet high and visible from 31 miles away, where it should be 280 feet below the line of sight.
86) The light at Cape Bonavista, Newfoundland is 150 feet above sea-level and visible at 35 miles, where it should be 491 feet below the horizon.
87) The lighthouse steeple of St. Botolph’s Parish Church in Boston is 290 feet tall and visible from over 40 miles away, where it should be hidden a full 800 feet below the horizon!
88) The Isle of Wight lighthouse in England is 180 feet high and can be seen up to 42 miles away, a distance at which modern astronomers say the light should fall 996 feet below line of sight.
89) The Cape L’Agulhas lighthouse in South Africa is 33 feet high, 238 feet above sea level, and can be seen for over 50 miles. If the world were a globe, this light would fall 1,400 feet below an observer’s line of sight.
90) The Statue of Liberty in New York stands 326 feet above sea level and on a clear day can be seen as far as 60 miles away. If the Earth were a globe, that would put Lady Liberty at an impossible 2,074 feet below the horizon.
>>696031988
>Also explain time zones.
The sun revolves around the flat earth, creating different times of day as it goes.
>>696030903
And the flat earthers ignore yet another reason why they're wrong in order to fit their outdated crackpot theory.
>>696032029
91) The lighthouse at Port Said, Egypt, at an elevation of only 60 feet has been seen an astonishing 58 miles away, where, according to modern astronomy it should be 2,182 feet below the line of sight!
92) The Notre Dame Antwerp spire stands 403 feet high from the foot of the tower with Strasburg measuring 468 feet above sea level. With the aid of a telescope, ships can be distinguished on the horizon and captains declare they can see the cathedral spire from an amazing 150 miles away. If the Earth were a globe, however, at that distance the spire should be an entire mile, 5,280 feet below the horizon!
93) The St. George’s Channel between Holyhead and Kingstown Harbor near Dublin is 60 miles across. When half-way across a ferry passenger will notice behind them the light on Holyhead pier as well as in front of them the Poolbeg light in Dublin Bay. The Holyhead Pier light is 44 feet high, while the Poolbeg lighthouse 68 feet, therefore a vessel in the middle of the channel, 30 miles from either side standing on a deck 24 feet above the water, can clearly see both lights. On a ball Earth 25,000 miles in circumference, however, both lights should be hidden well below both horizons by over 300 feet!
>>696031911
That doesn't prove anything
>>696025595
>The earth isn't a perfect sphere either, it's actually a very awkwardly shaped ball,
actually, its very incorrect to describe that.
the earth is an oblate spheroid - the diameter pole-to-pole is about 40km less than around the equator. However, if you were to scale the earth down to a sphere 1m in diameter, the difference pole-to-pole and around the equator would be little more than 1mm. Likewise, the difference between the top of Mt Everest (8,800m above sea level), and the bottom of the Marianas Trench, (10,900m below sea level) would, on that 1m diameter globe, be about 0.25mm - little more than the thickness of a sheet of paper.
People badly overestimate how high and how low the earth's topography is, compared to how big it is around.
>>696028958
>>696029679
Why not just fly the aircraft into the localized sun?
>>696032109
94) From the highland near Portsmouth Harbor in Hampshire, England looking across Spithead to the Isle of Wight, the entire base of the island, where water and land come together composes a perfectly straight line 22 statute miles long. According to the ball-Earth theory, the Isle of Wight should decline 80 feet from the center on each side to account for the necessary curvature. The cross-hairs of a good theodolite directed there, however, have repeatedly shown the land and water line to be perfectly level.
95) On a clear day from the highland near Douglas Harbor on the Isle of Man, the whole length of the coast of North Wales is often plainly visible to the naked eye. From the Point of Ayr at the mouth of the River Dee to Holyhead comprises a 50 mile stretch which has also been repeatedly found to be perfectly horizontal. If the Earth actually had curvature of 8 inches per mile squared, as NASA and modern astronomy claim, the 50 mile length of Welsh coast seen along the horizon in Liverpool Bay would have to decline from the center-point an easily detectable 416 feet on each side!
>>696032082
If that was true you would always see the sun. Also that makes no sense
>>696030745
>>696032173
96) From “100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe” by William Carpenter, “If we take a journey down the Chesapeake Bay, by night, we shall see the ‘light’ exhibited at Sharpe's Island for an hour before the steamer gets to it. We may take up a position on the deck so that the rail of the vessel's side will be in a line with the ‘light’ and in the line of sight; and we shall find that in the whole journey the light won't vary in the slightest degree in its apparent elevation. But, say that a distance of thirteen miles has been traversed, the astronomers' theory of ‘curvature’ demands a difference (one way or the other!) in the apparent elevation of the light, of 112 feet 8 inches! Since, however, there is not a difference of 100 hair's breadths, we have a plain proof that the water of the Chesapeake Bay is not curved, which is a proof that the Earth is not a globe.”
97) NASA and modern astronomy say the Earth is a giant ball tilted back, wobbling and spinning 1,000 mph around its central axis, traveling 67,000 mph circles around the Sun, spiraling 500,000 mph around the Milky Way, while the entire galaxy rockets a ridiculous 670,000,000 mph through the Universe, with all of these motions originating from an alleged “Big Bang” cosmogenic explosion 14 billion years ago. That’s a grand total of 670,568,000 mph in several different directions we’re all supposedly speeding along at simultaneously, yet no one has ever seen, felt, heard, measured or proven a single one of these motions to exist whatsoever.
>>696032154
That would make Jesus mad
So why exactly is CIA lying to us? I mean, what is the point of a global conspiracy to hide the shape of the world? What do they stand to gain?
>>696032130
Really? I always thought it was shaped more or less like a blancmange.
>>696032260
98) NASA and modern astronomy say Polaris, the North Pole star, is somewhere between 323-434 light years, or about 2 quadrillion miles, away from us! Firstly, note that is between 1,938,000,000,000,000 - 2,604,000,000,000,000 miles making a difference of 666,000,000,000,000 (over six hundred trillion) miles! If modern astronomy cannot even agree on the distance to stars within hundreds of trillions of miles, perhaps their “science” is flawed and their theory needs re-examining. However, even granting them their obscurely distant stars, it is impossible for heliocentrists to explain how Polaris manages to always remain perfectly aligned straight above the North Pole throughout Earth’s various alleged tilting, wobbling, rotating and revolving motions.
99) Viewed from a ball-Earth, Polaris, situated directly over the North Pole, should not be visible anywhere in the Southern hemisphere. For Polaris to be seen from the Southern hemisphere of a globular Earth, the observer would have to be somehow looking “through the globe,” and miles of land and sea would have to be transparent. Polaris can be seen, however, up to over 20 degrees South latitude.
>>696032130
Stop repeating what le black science man said in some interview and do your own research
>>696032082
Why would the sun be orbiting the earth? That's not how gravity works.
>>696032296
They know we don't but we know but they don't know we know so now we know and they can't stop us from knowing because they don't know that we know.
Makes perfect sense.
>>696032345
>don't listen to experts! listen to idiots!
>>696032328
100) If Earth were a ball, the Southern Cross and other Southern constellations would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude as is the case in the North with Polaris and its surrounding constellations. Ursa Major/Minor and many others can be seen from every Northern meridian simultaneously whereas in the South, constellations like the Southern Cross cannot. This proves the Southern hemisphere is not “turned under” as in the ball-Earth model, but simply stretching further outwards away from the Northern center-point as in the flat Earth model.
Enjoy your country 'Mericans.
>>696032176
See >>696031137
It's a perfect thing made by god with us at the center.
>>696032296
To take away our faith in Jesus and push us to Satanism aka science
>>696030903
>>696032091
The earth is flat because it just is, and thats my proof. Deal with it.
>>696032416
>theist
Idiot confirmed
>>696028690
So there's that thing with not being a nasa photo and then there's this argument you're making up about the lack of stars.
'might want to look into photography and exposure before making false assumptions. Hell, just pick a camera and take pictures of stars in lit up areas and not, with flash, without flash. That should help you understand.
>>696032109
>>696032029
>>696031957
>>696031649
>>696031506
>>696031412
>>696031292
>>696031192
>>696030986
>>696030800
>>696030679
>>696030498
>>696030362
>>696030292
>>696030217
>>696030110
>>696030026
>>696029903
if you're so obsessed with Rowbotham's "theories", why are you copying these quotes mindlessly? Have you actually gone and observed any of these claims yourself?
if not, then you have failed to understand what the zeteticism society Rowbotham was part of was proclaiming. You have simply taken your blind trust, from one set of claims - the reality of physics, astronomy, and all modern science, and replaced them with another set of claims - the uncorroborated anecdotes of the FES.
>>696031137
Go to the north pole during winter. See no sun. Flat Earth failed.
/thread
>>696032536
You know I'm in support of a round Earth right? That's why I posted that Soviet pic.
>>696031649
the earth is not a perfect round ball. its bumpy as fuck and did you even consider mountains and valleys?
>>696032416
literally bronze age beliefs
>>696031583
>They don't change size
WRONG AGAIN
>>696027674
>why does the sun change size if it's 90+ million miles away? any lensing or exposure argument also applies to the night sky, which is never distorted.
>>696032394
>doesn't realise everyone claims to be an expert
Yeah now I know you're plain trolling.
>DONT DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH, WATCH A QUICK YOUTUBE VIDEO TO KNOW IT ALL!
sure buddy
>>696032448
Please step away from the Satan machine aka computer.
>>696032655
To be fair, bronze age beliefs would have had some beefy guy holding it up to keep it from falling into the void. So, they're a bit more fun to read.
>>696032509
It's true.
There is no gravity.
The world just sucks.
>>696032671
You had to resort to "GOD DID IT" in an argument about science.
Calling spiderman
>>696032667
dat glare
>>696032296
you think there is no more land to explore, even though admiral byrd said there are new continents beyond anartica
>>696032537
This. Rowbotham fabricated evidence of a theory that has been proven wrong for a very long time in order to get money from idiots who think they're "enlightened". Complete fraud
>>696032803
And you had to resort to a "there is no god" fallacy when there clearly is.
>>696026170
>trigonometry is propaganda
> people actually believe this
>>696032872
if the sun was 90 million miles away the flare would be consistent
>>696027739
Holy hell
>>696032913
But there is no god. If there was a god he'd say so. Clearly it wouldn't take god more than 30 seconds to get my number and call me up.
>>696032874
I think we have a whole solar system to explore, and later we have countless other stars and planets
The Flat Earth Society has members all around the globe.
>>696033097
>implying that you are worthy to be the recipient of a special revelation
Go read your bible, dumbass
Even if the earth is flat (it isn't) what would anyone have to gain by saying otherwise?
>mfw when alot of you fags actually fell for this obvious bait
>>696032960
we actually didnt say that, nice strawman argument.
what we said was that this math and data is supplied by globalist, so the test results being abnormal and flat have nothing to do with 'flat earth math' because there is none, only math supplied by globalists.
>>696033017
Near the horizon the light passes through far more air and dust
I still can't tell if flat earth retards are the world's most dedicated trolls or if they are completely brain dead and gullible.
>>696032537
>mfw tells you not to trust this scientist, but trust this one instead cuz they say something different
public education at it's finest right here
>Preachers said God is Real, God IS Real, even if Atheist says No God, Atheist never went looking for God obviously
>>696033262
Shrodingers retard.
>>696033184
I have. My fave verse is Matt 6:5-6.
>“And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
