Sh0ta thread
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Sh0ta thread
>>694814295
If you ever replace characters with symbols again, I'm going to fucking cut your throat.
Sup fags
>>694815118
hajime no
>>694815220
Oh chill out. This is a typical means of starting these threads. I don't know if the word automatically leads to thread self destruct anymore, but old habits die hard.
>>694815321
Hiya
>>694815327
Eh?
Does anyone have the webm of the trap riding cock in reverse cowgirl, like pick related, just pov?
>>694816134
Not a trap thread mate. Might want to ask at one of those...
>>694816283
Hmm i've tried. I tjink may one of you have it
>>694816499
If I got that right, you are hoping one of us have it? It's possible. There's certainly some overlap for a few of us.
>>694816711
Hmm i thought do too
A hard decision between them, honestly.
Now that people are here...preferences?
https://discord.gg/rxubDTu
Hi.
>>694817454
In what exactly?
>>694817683
tea
>>694817761
Earl Grey
>>694817683
For me to post?
>>694817859
Hmm... Shota feet maybe?
>>694818015
>>694818143
Oh god >\\\<
>>694817454
Butts
>>694819253
Boom! Can do.
>>694819375
well it's a sh0ta thread, so it's probably p accutrate
brb, gotta kill a fly
>>694819375
If I had a cock in front of me, it would absolutely be sucked.
Just clarify something for a lurkingfag... can you fags be trusted around public swimming pools where little boys are getting undressed or are you only attracted to drawings of boys?
>>694819882
to be perfectly honest, you get a mix of both in these threads...I'd like to think it's more drawn-only types, but you never know
>>694819882
Trusted? I might steal your sunscreen.
>>694819882
Only drawing. Or real ones if they're teenagers. But IRL actual shota is unattractive.
and I cba to respond to that question for the 1000th time, but, 2-d a best
>>694820287
>>694820227
>>694820140
Well that's actually good to know. This stuff is certainly healthier than the alternative.
>>694819882
Even if a dude was totally perverse, and wanted to stare at the kiddies, only the incredibly dumb ones would, and then they'd be banned. Win win.
>>694820395
Even if, all pedos I've talked to on /r9k/ or /b/ all say they would never do anything even to a consenting child, and it's not as if people here get out of the basement much.
