Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [Home]
RandomArchive logo

>Four cookie cutter women >A loud ass obnoxious black chick

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Thread replies: 260
Thread images: 39
File: maxresdefault.jpg (181 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
181 KB, 1920x1080
>Four cookie cutter women
>A loud ass obnoxious black chick
>The nerdy leader
>The one that tries too hard to seem like a hard ass
>And Melissa McCarthy playing Melissa McCarthy
>Every male role is just a moron or eye candy (sometimes both)
>Horrible CGI
>No chemistry between characters
>Proton packs actually don't kill ghosts but they do in this because fuck it
>And to top it of, they kill the main villian By shooting him in the dick.

So who still wants to see "Death to the Patriarchy the Movie?"
>>
File: Kill Me.png (106 KB, 1227x594) Image search: [Google]
Kill Me.png
106 KB, 1227x594
>>
>>693808771
shit anon, thanks for saving me the time and brain cells
>>
>>693808771
Yeah, it looks embarrassing and terrible. Looks like all cringe all the time, and I'm their "target demographic".
>>
>>693809171
I don't even know what their target it. It's not for younger kids, it's not for people who liked the first one, it's not for anyone
>>
>>693809307
I'm getting a lot of "grrrl power" vibes and that shit got old in the 90's. You're right, I don't think it'll be enjoyable for anyone.
>>
>>693808771
So who cares?

There are a thousand movies like that with genders reversed. Just accept that it will be a shitty movie that no man will want to see and move on. Quite posting threads bitching about shit like a fucking child.
>>
>>693808771

>cookie cutter characters
>nerdy leader
>obnoxious black
>fat
>eye candle
>horrible effects
>no chemistry

weird its almost like they took an exact script of the original and just made them women.
>>
>>693808771
aww. Your so angry. Does someone need to be put down for his nappy nap?
>>
>>693810105
I don't want to watch that Lifetime shit either. You're right about the absurd level of butthurt. I wish people would learn how to not give a shit.
>>
>>693810212
>eye candle
What
Also the original was made 30 years ago and still employed significantly less cringy clichés.
>>693810385
The only people who can possibly be mad is the feminists who are outraged because their garbage movie is getting horrible reviews
>>
>>693810212
gonna guess u wer born in the 90s
>>
File: 1457112205242.png (1 MB, 1600x601) Image search: [Google]
1457112205242.png
1 MB, 1600x601
>>
File: 1457192207582.jpg (15 KB, 272x272) Image search: [Google]
1457192207582.jpg
15 KB, 272x272
i cant wait to c this movie bomb
>>
>>693810212
except not?
>obnoxious black
Uh for once the black guy in the original was literally the least obnoxious and most normal
>no chemistry
Except there was though.. thats what made them so endearing they felt like an actual group of friends
>horrible effects
The effects from the 80s version look better than modern day. That should say enough.
>eye candy
nigga only 1 of the women in ghostbusters was pretty.
>cookier cutter characters
Harold Ramis's character was a genius with aspergers... I dont think thats cookie cutter
>>
File: 1428160849072.jpg (21 KB, 160x160) Image search: [Google]
1428160849072.jpg
21 KB, 160x160
>>693810944

>MUH NOSTALGIA

uh huh, you sure are unbiased, that proved me wrong!
>>
>>693811044
[ ] Not Told
[X] Told
[X] Really Told
[X] No country for Told Men
>>
>>693811044
>Provides detailed reasons why your points are wrong
>HURR NOSTALGIA

Ok fag, didn't know I was debating with a moron
>>
File: 1388615572051.png (386 KB, 446x395) Image search: [Google]
1388615572051.png
386 KB, 446x395
>>693811272

>detailed reasons

your 'detailed reasons were'
>i tihnk hes not obnoxious
>i think there was chemistry
>i disagree on effects!
>i find only one of the women attractive cuz im gay

those were really detailed well articulated actually documented points you got there! not just 'MUH OPINIONS'.

Good job.
>>
>>693811272
>debating on 4chan.
>debating on /b/.

I wonder which one of the 2 is the actual moron
>>
>>693811449
>>693811520
coolio
>>
I feel bad for Kristen Wiig.
>>
>>693811520

its him. I've literally never even seen ghost busters and i only posted that as bait.
>>
File: 1466963356668.gif (28 KB, 987x862) Image search: [Google]
1466963356668.gif
28 KB, 987x862
>>693812008
>>
>>693808771
na more like this
> wacky one
> wacky one
> wacky one
> and the blacky one
>>
>>693812678

>the blacky one

kekd
>>
>>693810936
It saddens me to say I've actually seen people laugh at that scene.. I hope it bombs.. but you never know, theres so much controversy now it might still make money from people going to see it even if just to shit on it.
>>
Who cares? Ghostbusters is some nerd shit. Anything from the 80s has always been hot garbage. The only good thing of Ghostbusters was that 90s cartoon. So glad I'm born in 1989, I got the best of the 80s after it was all filtered out, and the glorious 90s.

Bottom line: Ghostbusters has always sucked.
>>
>>693811449
Here's the thing: both of your posts are opinions, so shut the fuck up. If one of your opinions were more 'wrong' thN the other, it would be yours, because 95% of everyone agrees the original Ghostbusters was a good film.
>>
>>693812873
This. It's as if they've marketed it this way on purpose. Maybe they did.
>>
>>693813079

>both your posts are opinions

im allowed to post my opinion. so is the guy who responded to me. nothing wrong with that.a

the problem is that he insisted that his opinions were, and i quote:
>detailed reasons why (my) points are wrong

when it was literally just
>I DISAGREE.

thats the issue here mate. everyones welcome to pretend to enjoy their shitty ghost comedy that literally no one cared about until feminism rebooted it.

but if hes going to be retarded and say that his opinions somehow proved my opinions wrong, im gonna point out how retarded he is.
>>
File: 1460219238694.jpg (17 KB, 640x406) Image search: [Google]
1460219238694.jpg
17 KB, 640x406
only saw trailer but when i saw one of them duel carrying 2 lazer guns and licking one of them cringe movie of the year
>>
>>693813690

>literally only saw the cover
>worst book ever
>>
>>693813380
You're both doing the exact same shit. Go whine somewhere else.

>shitty ghost comedy that no one cared about
The fuck? Ghostbusters is a pretty iconic film. The new film is not the reason the franchise is what it is. The only people not entirely pissed about its existence are feminists.
>>
>>693813380
bruh how are you still goin on about this
>>693811667
was my last response.........Let it go
Breathe
>>
>>693813790
I cant believe I have to say this to another human being unironically
A movie is not a book
>>
>>693810212
2000 kid detected
>>
>>693813790
if its called hairy potter 8 and its harry potter hanging spread legged from a wall while taking a dump into ron weaslys open mouth it be like this movie
>>
>>693813790
>saw the trailer that literally has one fucking purpose and that's promoting the movie and showing people the best they should expect from the movie
>trailer was shit
If this is the best they could scape together from the movie to market it, I'm not interested in the movie
>>
>>693813790
Well the trailers are made to market their movie, you're supposed to put the best you got in the trailer to make people go "That looks good" and go see it. If thats the best they got and supposed to make me go "wow that looks good"...they failed. which i think is what >>693813690 is saying
>>
>>693811449
>implying your opinions on the movie arent opinions
>>
>>693813911

>people insist on responding
>BRUH WHY DO YOU ALSO RESPOND?

>>693813911

>I TRIED TO HAVE THE LAST WORD WHY WONT YOU LET ME HAVE IT

bruh, let it go.


>>693814049

and when people said 'dont judge a book by its cover' they werent talking about books at all. they were talking about everything, particularly people, but everything.

you have labeled a movie teh cringiest of the year because of its trailer.

almost like you judged a book by its cover.

>>693813824

>you're doing the same thing.

of course, but im doing it literally just to argue. you guys insist you dont want to argue but keep arguing.

>>693814072

nigga i was born in 1972. i never got married so i just make bait threads all day.

>>693814156

touche.

though 'im not interested' and 'cringiest movie of the year' are two very different things.

>>693814157

see above.
>>
>>693814343

i never said (or implied) that they werent.

but that particular anon insisted that he gave detailed reasons for why i was wrong.

he didnt. that was the point i was making. are you dumb?
>>
>>693813063
Poor bait
>>
>>693808771
I guarantee there's a scene where the black one says "awwww HELLLLLLL nahhh"
>>
File: 9g2mrhmr7c7x.jpg (214 KB, 1350x550) Image search: [Google]
9g2mrhmr7c7x.jpg
214 KB, 1350x550
they blast the stay puft man in the dick. spoiler.
>>
File: 1465676304314.jpg (187 KB, 615x409) Image search: [Google]
1465676304314.jpg
187 KB, 615x409
>>693810897
>>
>>693814751
>>693808771

i fucking knew that would be the ending.

ofc it had to be somehow attacking male genitalia.
>>
>>693811272
>>693811449

Seems to me those were detailed reasons... Those things he mentioned very easily make a movie bad, good, or one of the greats. There is a reason everyone's see. Ghostbusters and its a classic. Fucking feminazis... Will overlook anything and completely fail to see logic every time to support their bullshit ideas. Christ. Characters, Personalities, and bad plot decisions must mean nothing to a movie, right? That can't mean anything.
>>
i mean imagine the men in the original ghost busters had shot Gozer in the pussy.

feminists would have torn the theaters apart.
>>
more like BallBusters amirite
>>
>>693813174
I think people are smart enough to not fall for that trick maybe 10 years ago but nobody wants to support this feminist grabage
>>
File: 1467047687340.jpg (33 KB, 334x500) Image search: [Google]
1467047687340.jpg
33 KB, 334x500
>>693812678
> and the blacky one
>>
>>693812008
So much cringe here
>>
>>693808771
looks like the roles have been reversed in this movie. Now watch all the manlets feel threatened in their masculinity.
>>
File: 1440346048605.jpg (80 KB, 600x600) Image search: [Google]
1440346048605.jpg
80 KB, 600x600
>>693808771
So is the main villian called Everyman?

Also sony is doing massive dmg control on this movie i bet som of their trolls is even in this tread
>>
>>693814450
no not really but you seem to be
>>
>>693814993

>its logic to say
>nah those were good effects
>nah he wasnt obnoxious
>nah only one girl was hot

good one.
>>
>>693816608

>i know you are but what am I

jesus christ, it took you twenty minutes to think up that response?
>>
>>693815352
Then you have more faith in humanity than I do.
>>
>>693808771
I love how they sell this as a female empowerment movie, when the person in charge of it and ordering everyone around is a man.

Also I love how they say sexist and the final scene is the four of them shooting a male ghost in the cock.
>>
>>693808771
hey OP. What kind of cameo did the original cast have.
>>
>>693810212

Hahaaaa! THIS

You dumb fuckers actually think ghost busters as a good movie.
It fucking wasn't. The acting was uninspiring, the characters (Especially john belushi) were unrealistic and there was minimal plot.


Take off your nostalgia goggles.
>>
>>693817429
belushi wasn't in Ghostbusters
>>
>>693816806
nou
>>
>>693810944

>nerdy genius
>dependable guy
>cool cocksman
>wise-cracking balck guy

Yeah. Totally revolutionary.
You fucking idiot
>>
>>693808771
Literally cancer the movie
>>
>>693812873
what is the scene?
>>
>>693817502
technically the slimer was based on belushi since he was supposed to be in it but then died
>>
>>693817502

i meant bill murray.
>>
>>693817672
When the black ape woman is slapping the fat woman while screaming at the top of her lungs

>>693817564
cool dude
>>
>>693810212
>eye candle
that sounds fucking dangerous mate
>>
>>693814962
that is all melissa shithead mccarthy is good for.
>>
File: 1465080365142.gif (1 MB, 243x313) Image search: [Google]
1465080365142.gif
1 MB, 243x313
Now I'm going to watch it 3 times, because fuck you.
>>
>>693817743
I love how they had to threaten Murray with legal action to be in the movie.
>>
>>693818037
Well it's not like you have any brain cells to lose.
>>
File: 1465074923194.gif (3 MB, 350x237) Image search: [Google]
1465074923194.gif
3 MB, 350x237
>complaining about women
grow up
>>
>>693810105
What did you expect, a shit movie comes out people are gonna complain about it
>>
>>693811705
Me too, I love her and Kate, the other two should jump of a bridge
>>
>>693818150
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Sony-Might-Sue-Bill-Murray-Playing-Ball-Ghostbusters-68651.html
>>
File: 2016-06-19_215102.png (21 KB, 161x229) Image search: [Google]
2016-06-19_215102.png
21 KB, 161x229
>>693818224
nice argument, bitch
>>
They re-made it because they know there's an entire generation of millennial fags who can't watch any movie more than 10 years old.

You know you are going to watch it.
You know you're going to give them your money.
So stop bitching about it and accept
that you're the problem -
they made this piece of shit because they know
you are going to fucking watch it.
>>
>>693808771
Everyone already knew it would be shit. I'm just happy to see they didn't disappoint.
>>
File: frog with pinnaples LOL!.png (27 KB, 960x540) Image search: [Google]
frog with pinnaples LOL!.png
27 KB, 960x540
How do I make an account?
>>
>>693818310
No, this isn't about a shit movie, see gods of egypt.

This is about a movie studio, the actors and the director hating on the potential audience and saying the only reason they hated it was because they are sexist.

Meanwhile the film is otherworld level garbage and it, itself is sexist as fuck.
>>
File: 1447965482179.jpg (137 KB, 650x650) Image search: [Google]
1447965482179.jpg
137 KB, 650x650
>>693811044
>>
>>693810212
3/8, I'll give ya that m8.
>>
>>693818479
but i aint tho
>>
>>693811272
> didn't know I was debating with a moron
>on /b/
Really anon?
>>
i will not see the movie for obvious reasons, however if you want somebody to blame its bill murray. he sandbagged a new ghostbusters movie for over 20 years when the franchise is a gold mine. dan ackroyd even wrote a couple scripts and bill murray refused to do it... everyone was ready to do a new one except bill murray because he was too good, even though he will do a shit pile like zombie land for peanuts... bill murray could have made one phone call and had a new ghost busters in production, but he said fuck the fans basically. plus harold remus is dead now, so on top of bill murray being too good for ghostbusters the original cast cant be put together again.
>>
>>693810105
Cuck detected
>>
>>693818815
ya true true, its been a while
>>
>>693813790
The cover isn't meant to highlight the books theme/story telling style/etc. You are comparing apples to oranges. Trailers are meant to tell us a good deal about how the movie will be, and they highlight what the creators think are some of the best bits. If their best is cringy as fuck, it's not wrong to think that their worst may not be up to par.
>>
>>693818992

is cuck just a thing we throw around now for no reason?
Is it just like calling someone a fag? It's just a generic, meaningless, overused insult?
>>
all these petty "the 80's was so much better" shut the fuck up, ghostbusters was fucking awesome for it's time but hasn't aged well, the 2016 remake will bomb because it's part of a retarded "feminist movement" seriously these fucking hags are watching you make these cancerous threads and laughing as people talk about how shit the movie is. any publicity is good publicity don't give objects such as women attention, they will only want more
>>
>>693819141
Maybe it's beginning to become like that, newfags have no idea what it means and just say it because they think it's a 4chinz insult
>>
>>693814816
LOL'D
>>
>>693814816
See I may actually watch that though.
>>
>>693808771
I'll see it because if I don't a horde of bitchy feminists will attack me
>>
>>693819219
This
>>
>>693818816
Jesus Christ, learn to think.
Then learn to read, then write.
At this moment, you may be euphoric,
but you Don't. Know. Nothin'.
>>
>>693819307
Cuck
>>
File: 7eAv4nM.jpg (5 KB, 126x225) Image search: [Google]
7eAv4nM.jpg
5 KB, 126x225
>>
>>693810212
I take it you've never seen the original. Take some time to go watch it and come back, ill wait.
>>
>>693819219
>hasn't aged well
true i've seen pornos with better cgi
>>
>>693819785
Fag
>>
To anyone who's actually considering going to see this movie I strongly suggest and even insist that you see the original, first.

Once you've seen the original you won't want to bother with this piece of shit chunk of feminist SJW propaganda.
>>
>>693819628
what exactly was i wrong about? or do you think its the hollywood jews who want to ruin everybodys childhood? sorry to tell you cash is the bottom line with these guys, if bill murray had agreed to do another one you all wouldnt be crying about it.
>>
>>693810212
Nigga have you even seen the original?
>>
File: Miami Vice beach.jpg (553 KB, 1188x1500) Image search: [Google]
Miami Vice beach.jpg
553 KB, 1188x1500
>>693819219

I think its aged pretty well. Most movies that become pop culture phenomenons struggle to justify their level of popularity without the hype that accompanies their release.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDQk4lGSEJQ
>>
>>693811449
If you hate life and good movies thats on you bro. Keep finding pictures of girls laughing and ignoring your life for "MUH KEKS" Ill be attempting actual conversation. Also kill yourself.
>>
>>693811044
Hi Laci!
>>
File: 1467479341266.png (71 KB, 209x211) Image search: [Google]
1467479341266.png
71 KB, 209x211
>>693810212
nigger please
>>
The original was good. Not god-like, but it had some decent humor and a decent plot. The new one relies entirely on-the-nose style of "comedy" with harsh political overtones. By comparison, the original was a masterpiece. So in that respect I'd say the new movie helped the franchise.
>>
>>693810944
This.

I've seen a lot of movies from that era (I'm 37) and I honestly can't think of anything quite like Ghostbusters.

I mean...some of the characters in GB and GB 2 are STILL iconic.

William Atherton pretty much made his career on this movie...he played essentially the same dickhead guy in Die Hard.

Janine (The receptionist) was a great character...and Rick Moranis was ALSO a great character.

I mean, if you watch the movie, the snarky report between Bill Murray and Sigorney Weaver is really what makes HIS character. No one is going to replace that chemistry.

Dan Akryoid has ALWAYS been a supporting comedic genius. Back since the Bass-o-matic. He's just a great straight man.

And if you think some random chick is going to play Harold Ramis....you're high.

If you'll recall, Ernie Hudson wasn't even introduced until the movie was almost over. He was a bigger character in the second film. ("I've seen shit that will turn you white!")

It's really the chemistry between Murray, Akroyd, Ramis, Morris, Weaver that is what made the movie work.

The second, it was made by Weaver and "Yonnish" and the trio.
>>
>>693813063
I bet you think Lil Wayne is a lyrical genius too
>>
>>693818816
Because Murray is the only one who isn't an idiot.

You know, it's ok to write NEW movies...with NEW ideas.

No one seems to have done this in the last 15 years. They just steal old franchises and remake them or turn a comic book into a movie 100 fucking times.

How about an original god damn movie for once!

If you want me to fork out like 30 fucking dollars to just WATCH a movie let alone drive there, get a meal, enjoy it, then maybe buy a dvd later so I could see it again, MAKE SOMETHING FUCKING GOOD! SPEND MORE THAN 10 MINUTES WHILE YOU'RE ON THE SHITTER WRITING THE SCRIPT.
>>
>>693818479
If I watch it at all I will be certain to illegally stream it, I refuse to put money in the pockets of anybody associated with this. I liked the original films, but this isn't a nostalgia thing. I wanted to like this one too, then I saw the trailer. The acting is just awful, like middle school play bad. The jokes aren't funny. The effects make the ones in the vhs copy of the original look revolutionary. But I'm just a sexist for hating it right?
>>
man you dont shoot a guy in the dick.
>>
>>693820231
it has aged well as a classic however, in a cgi era compared to newer movies it can't compete, for it's time special effects were great but it's storyline and acting are what it is known for
>>
>>693821710
This is usually true, but in some cases (coughcough2016ghostbusterscough) the effects on a VHS copy look more convincing. Look, there are new movies with phenomenal cgi effects, but there are plenty with just awful effects too.
>>
>>693822048
yeah true but also remember that you used to be able to put real things (stay puft guy,jurassic park dinosaurs, jabba the hut(original)(holy shit bracketception, is this even legal?)) instead of cgi, whereas now shit like that wouldn't fly
>>
>>693822781
it used to be a little easier with lower expectations is what i'm trying to say
>>
File: 1457116110600.jpg (56 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
1457116110600.jpg
56 KB, 1280x720
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-6VLuz75yw
>>
>>693822781
practical effects is why most people liked starwarsVI more than the 3 prequels.
>>
>>693823026
yeah fuck that creepy ass redone jabba the hut and motherfucking jar jar, cunts get me so worked up that they ruined my near perfect franchise
>>
>>693808771
You watched it? Why?
>>
>>693822781
>>693822867
Yeah, but my point is some of these new films are outclassed by cgi from a decade ago, and even the worst practical effects from the 70s. When Italian horror films with the budget of a plate of spaghetti can outdo your multimillion dollar cgi, you suck.
>>
File: 1434526492576.jpg (53 KB, 600x450) Image search: [Google]
1434526492576.jpg
53 KB, 600x450
White Males are getting real fed up with this shit.
The blowback is going to make Jihad look like a 2 week vacation.
>>
>>693823311
personally I kind of like the prequels now. I didnt used to but I rewatched them recently and if you dont nitpick them they arent half bad starwars movies. but Jar Jar can eat a bag of dicks regardless.
>>
>>693823518
honestly alien compared to warcraft(2016)
>>
It's funny to me how when men are victims of sexism, we're just like "Well, fuck you then."
and when women are, they make a spectacle of it, and freak the fuck out.
>>
>>693808771
I don't even care about the movie. I just want it to bomb hard so I can enjoy all the salt.
>>
>>693808771
You shouldn't have expected it to be good.
It's just film clichés and Hollywood trying to appeal those who loved the originals, but with a touch of 'moderness' so everyone is happy.
>>
>>693809307
Feminists, and lgbt supporters.
>>
Do you have any idea what it is like to be a white-male in this country? You are constantly being attacked from all sides. Kicked to the curb, being told you are a racist, being told that you are a sexist, being told that your history is evil, and all around not allowed to have an opinion on anything without being attacked on all fronts as a "horrible person". Well guess what? We are tired of it and preparing for war. If you don't see the race war coming then you are going to be shocked when the death-squads show up at your door.
>>
>>693810105
Quit bitching about bitching hypocrite bitch.

Is it really that hard to not read a thread? Fuck.
>>
>>693822969
lol they really think girls are going to buy this shit? girls like barbie not action hero's wtf is wrong with these fags?
>>
So what I get from this movie is that feminist can shit on men but when the men call them up on their bullshit they start to riot and call men sexist and pigs.
>>
>>693824098
youre an idiot. its made for women. Never heard of a chick flick before? newsflash most men hate those fucking movies.
>>
>>693810105

This. /thread
>>
>>693824228

Kys you edgy neet faggot.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apsNZMER3xc

If you have a weak heart or are easily triggered by intense stereotypes being realized, don't watch.
>>
>>693808771
idk every woman I know thinks it looks like shit too
>>
>>693813790
No, the trailer is some gap-toothed retard randomly flipping to pages in the book, shoving it in your face and going "SEE? SEE? IZN'T IT SO FFFUUUNNNNNNYYYY?! HUHUHUH" and crapping himself while giggling at unfunny parts.
>>
File: 1467468011093.jpg (191 KB, 743x743) Image search: [Google]
1467468011093.jpg
191 KB, 743x743
>>693808771
>>
I just want you to imagine a Ghost Busters with male protagonists who - to defeat a female boss - have to target her breasts and vagina. Cue Earth exploding.
>>
>>693815806
>men are afraid of strong wymyn

Wearing a shirt that says "kill your local anti feminist" typing days worth of tumblr rants, and squatting on your dragon dildo doesn't exactly qualify as being strong.
>>
>>693825656
thats pretty good.
>>
>>693809307
Fat goblins aka feminists.
>>
Yeah, women don't have big roles in movies yet. Men like Angelina Jolie and Jennifer Lawrence are hogging them.
>>
Is this going to be one is those movies where all the SLW libs in Hollywood are like, "It's funny, you're just sexist/racist, these are hilarious female comedians"... But only because they have a point to prove and objectively there's no smart humor in the film at all.
>>
File: Ball Busters.jpg (476 KB, 891x826) Image search: [Google]
Ball Busters.jpg
476 KB, 891x826
>>693808771
here is the poster
>>
>>693817429
Stop samefagging to seem like someone finally got your back.

>inb4 photoshooped (You)
>>
>>693822969
The proposed GBIII sounds like it would have actually been a good movie. Fuck sony.
>>
I liked 10 Cloverfield Lane. I really liked The Force Awakens. I love the Kill Bill movies. Alien & Aliens are two of the best movies ever made, IMHO. What do these movies have in common? Strong female protagonists. And yet when I say that Ghostbusters 2016 looks bad -- an uninspired, unoriginal, lazy, cash-grab movie produced by the studio that ruined Spider-man... TWICE -- I'm instantly labeled a woman-hating misogynist. I don't get it.
>>
Why the fuck is this a thing anyway.. NOBODY asked for a fucking remake of ghostbusters, all girls or not it prolly would of still been shit but this is retarded.
>>
>>693808771
You just hate women obviously.
>>
>>693824942
such female comedy
>>
>>693815940
twitter account of this comic suspended. figures
>>
>>693822969
That's why you don't let a feminist run a business.
>>
>>693826102
This so hard.
I don't get how females are oppressed in Hollywood. Yea if you want to star in comedies, and have tits and ass, they're going to make you the sex object. But literally every other genre has been flashing the females survive longer than males card since aliens. Horror, sci fi, and revenge thrillers all use strong female leads over men constantly.
>>
>>693826558
>Horror, sci fi, and revenge thrillers all use strong female leads over men constantly.

EVERY SINGLE horror movie these days are centered around women.
>>
>>693822969
What a fucking cunt.
>>
File: image.jpg (15 KB, 225x225) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
15 KB, 225x225
>>693810212
>>
>>693826836
Isn't exactly horror, but Green Room evens it out with Anton Yelchin.
>>
File: Clipboard01.jpg (636 KB, 1582x1039) Image search: [Google]
Clipboard01.jpg
636 KB, 1582x1039
>>693824942
There are smart niggers like Morgan Freeman and there are ...
well niggers.
And also sweaty niggers
>>
>>693825892
Libfag here. I think it looks like garbage too. The gender flip is a gimmick and the "grrrl power" jokes will be cringe as fuck.
>>
>>693827061
>Anton Yelchin

AND NOW HE'S FUCKING DEAD.

smh
>>
File: Lex Luthor for President.jpg (33 KB, 434x640) Image search: [Google]
Lex Luthor for President.jpg
33 KB, 434x640
>>693824942

>"I want to play a supervillain."

Gorilla Grod?
>>
>>693827127
That armpit sweat though.

When did being "independent and proud" mean "Dirty and repulsive to the other gender."
>>
>>693825944
yeah i spend like 4 minutes erlier today making this shit after watching bunch of trailers and behind sceense and rumor videos on this pile of crap movie
>>
>>693822969
GHOST ALIENS OMG! SHE IS SO SMART!!!! IT'S SO AWESOME TO HAVE A PERSON WHO DOESN'T RELY ON CHEAP GIMMICKS!!!
>>
File: Dworkin_on_After_Dark.jpg (173 KB, 1070x941) Image search: [Google]
Dworkin_on_After_Dark.jpg
173 KB, 1070x941
>>693827495
That was when feminism happened
Because well you know, acting like an edgy teenager with the mindset of a brat child makes a woman strong and empowered
>>
>>693824820
>kys
Kill yourself newfag.
>>
>>693827495
You think she's sweating on purpose? Sweating isn't exactly like not shaving one's legs, it just happens.
>>
this will be in the $5 dollar Walmart bin in two weeks
>>
I really hope the sjw community gets pissed about the nigger being an extreme stereotype. Then nobody would be left to like the movie.
>>
How ironic that the best thing about this feminist, man-hating vomit is Chris Hemsworth.
>>
>>693808771

McCarthy is like the female Seth Rogan.

Continues to make comedy movie after comedy movie but completely unfunny.

It actually sickens me seeing this two fucking morons on screen.

They don't even so much as make me crack a smile.
>>
You say that men are portrayed poorly in this.
Well, I got to thinking.. The women in the original ones are not portrayed badly.
>>
>>693827955
There are anti-sweat dry deodorants and there are clothings that don't make it so obvious. There are also sweat pads and so on.
>>
You're all fucking retards.
The original Ghostbusters movie wasn't the best, but it's an average film and not too bad to watch. The new "modern" female version is god awful and painful to sit through.
It's not that difficult you daft cunts
>>
>>693813063
Why do people my age act this way? jesus
>>
It appears that Feig hates men and that's one of the driving forces behind his movies.
>>
>>693824820
>kys
get that cancerous shit out of here you newfag
>>
File: guardian.jpg (372 KB, 645x763) Image search: [Google]
guardian.jpg
372 KB, 645x763
>>693828037
They already did
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/mar/07/ghostbusters-leslie-jones-defends-remake-racial-stereotyping-criticism

We have 2016 mate, there is always something that people will get offended about.
>>
Hypocrisy at its best, this movie bashing men and then accusing men of misogyny
>>
>>693818037
sauce plz
>>
>>693828273
That shit doesn't always work. I'm not nesscarily standing up for her, it's just that your suggestion that she did this intentionally and as some sort of statement is absurd. That's it though, continue to shit on the movie otherwise. It looks awful.
>>
>>693827955
Antiperspirant deodorants help.

It's just an observation that nowadays, a lot of people are taking less and less care of their hygiene. Unfortunately people have been lead to believe that taking care of yourself it "Catering to oppression".

So we get a load of overweight and smelly people all over the place.
To be a part of this movie, she must share the ideology behind it, which is "Feminism".

So you can simply assume that she has made no effort to cover her smell of limit her sweating. And just sits there, stinking the place up.
>>
>>693828713
Not intentional but just careless. I mean there is not that she has no money and couldn't have used some sort of anti-transpirant.
>>
>>693814816

I don't get it. It's just a picture of the cast. Is there some joke I'm missing?
>>
File: 2802544.png (297 KB, 484x444) Image search: [Google]
2802544.png
297 KB, 484x444
>>693825892
exactly how people reacted to the new star wars

Any criticism shared was met with "RAYCISS SECKSISS"
>>
>>693824161
People well known to support things that pander to them.. Wait...
>>
>>693828539
kek

>Street-smart average new yorker

Apparently New York exists solely to propagate racial stereotypes.
>>
>>693818037
>>693828703
Yes, sauce is needed
>>
feminist garbage like everyone predicted? Colour me surprised.

I can't wait to see SJWs lose their shit when this travesty flops.
>>
>>693810385

You're*
>>
the whole minorities/women not having big roles in films is crap, the 80s slashers film(not the best example) but it was usually the women was always the last survivor and hero, even before that 70s slashers women are the hero's, the people who talk shit and only care about the action hero's who we're white but who cares, I'm Latino and all my favorite action films have female protagonists but I didn't care they were women they were just great characters, Ellen Ripley, Sarah Connor, Ann lewis, Anne Frankly I just want well written characters In film.
>>
Feminists don't live in reality, they make up bullshit and then just go with it. Same for "black actors are not respected", are you fucking kidding me? I grew up on Bad boys and I always loved Will Smith and all my friends did. But these SJW's simply create a narrative so they can keep people victims even though they aren't.
>>
File: maxresdefault.jpg (28 KB, 750x738) Image search: [Google]
maxresdefault.jpg
28 KB, 750x738
>>693818037
>skirt doesn't slip down
>>
This movie was never about female empower. It was just a attempt to pander and so many could see that. They made a CG saturated kids movie for women.
>>
File: 22.jpg (91 KB, 531x243) Image search: [Google]
22.jpg
91 KB, 531x243
>>693808771
haters gonna hate i guess
>>
"Minority actors don't get enough respec--" I'm gonna stop you right there. Black people get overrepresented in Hollywood; 13% of US population is black, and more than 13% of Hollywood is black. I'm not sure about women. But I know one thing for sure: if minority actors want to make it, they have to work hard for it. You don't get ahead in life by doing nothing and blaming "systemic racism" or "the patriarchy" (which are yet to be proven existent) when you don't become successful.
>>
>>693829598
This.
>>
>>693808771
Women fuck up everything
>>
>>693824228
basement-dwelling neet detected

this shit doesn't happen in the real world. get off the internet once in a while and you might realize 99% of normal people don't do any of this shit. white guys still have it the best. it's great. we get the jobs, we get paid more, we get women of any race. you just live in a tumblr/leddit echo chamber and have no idea what reality is like.

>we are tired of it and preparing for war
>death-squads showing up at your door

lol careful not to cut yourself on all that edge, you sperg ferguson
>>
>>693829828
True. You have 13% of the population that have their own movie franchises. Where is the Latino or Asian Tyler Perry? Where is the annual movie about Chinese railroad workers to go with the seemingly annual films made about slavery. Don't get me wrong I am not saying those films shouldn't exist but it is a case of under and over representation.
>>
>>693829948
dont make him mad, hes preparing for war
>>
is it just me or does /b/ have more SJW than /b/tards on it?
>>
>>693828539
Why don't these critics post all the prominent black female scientists in the world showing how the stereotype is bullshit and that black women have a presence in the scientific community.
>>
They're not feminists, they're feminazis who think women are superior to men instead of equal.
>>
I personally didn't like how they made the male assistant a dumb ass, was the assistant in the first movie stupid? NO she was capable and smart.
>>
File: leaked.gif (27 KB, 300x300) Image search: [Google]
leaked.gif
27 KB, 300x300
bit dot do slash cand
>>
Ghostbusters 2016: The remake that nobody wanted in 2016.
>>
>>693829598
"I dont know if its a race thing or a lady thing, but I'm pissed." says the black bitch after failing a stage dive.

oh bullshit.
>>
my mother wants to see it

how do I convince her it's a bad idea
>>
>>693812008
>>693812008
First day on the board, eh? Did you hear about /b/ from Reddit or ED?
>>
>>693830798
tell her she will die in her sleep if you dont repost
>>
>>693814362
Saddest person on /b/
Have you ever seriously considered killing yourself? Because this seems like one of those scenarios where that's the best solution.
>>
>>693808771
Thanks for saving me 2 hours of my life Anon. I hope this movie bombs.
>>
>>693818224
>defending women
That still won't make them want to fuck you, bro
>>
>>693817429
This better be fucking bait.
>>
>>693821125
>>693821125
How about you do that? I wanted to see another GOOD addition to the franchise.
>>
File: image.jpg (207 KB, 900x1200) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
207 KB, 900x1200
I think this picture pretty much explains it all.

They merchandise is already going on clearance in the toy aisle.
>>
>>693831671
>13.99

Still too much.
>>
It's making a good deal of money and has pretty good reviews. Maybe it's not too bad? Maybe?
>>
>>693814362
the independence day trailer almost fooled me they cant even get enough footage to make anyone even consider watching ghostbusters. It looks like a live action scooby do.
>>
Dunno if its the same company, but hollywood is dead (like Egon said, "Print is dead"). Hollywood has nothing original. They're fucking doing a Spartacus remake for FUCKS sake.
>>
>>693829649
>haters gonna hate i guess
Because that is literally what haters do. It's in the name an everything.
>>
>>693831671
On the plus side, those who really need a Melissa McCarthy action figure are going to have no problems getting one.
>>
>>693831671
13.99 is clearance for an action figure?!?
They can kiss the fattest part of my ass.
>>
>>693808771
That Is the same as the original. No one was saying it was setting out to break the mold
>>
>>693831671
Leslie Jones's figure looks the most like her, and it still comes across as an insulting caricature.
>>
>>693832245
they didnt shoot gozer in the pussy dipshit.
>>
>>693832245
still, it hurt some feelings.
>>
whats with feminists always wanting to mangle dudes dicks. what a bunch of sick puppies.
>>
inb4 cringy feminists writing articles how great the movie was
>>
File: 110310greenbusting.webm (2 MB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
110310greenbusting.webm
2 MB, 1280x720
>>693832830
>>
File: 1468073459289.gif (1 MB, 756x351) Image search: [Google]
1468073459289.gif
1 MB, 756x351
>>693808771
OH BOY DICK PUNCHING JOKES, WHAT A CLASSIC
>just in case no one believes that yes the final boss is beaten with a fucking crotch shot
>>
File: 1444596773674.png (263 KB, 800x675) Image search: [Google]
1444596773674.png
263 KB, 800x675
>>693832035
didn't you notice the optional Melissa McCarthy torso in that box?
>>
>>693808771
I fucking laugh my ass off at their marketing department. I've yet to see any photos for this abortion where the principal actors are SMILING. It's a fucking COMEDY, you dumb asses. Yes, I know, selling this steaming pile of shit Feig squeezed out of his ass is a hard sell - but showing us frowning women isn't going to sell tickets.
>>
>>693833037
are you taking it personal or something?
>>
>>693818224
It's not even that, we're complaining about a genuinely terrible looking movie whose only selling points are "huur durr fempower"
>>
>>693824408
Not all girls like Barbie's. I had a chick friend growing up, never had any Barbies, had shit like Transformers and G.I. Joes. (spoiler: she somehow DIDN'T turn out to be a dyke)
>>
>>693833921
Womens Rightsfag here. I 100% agree. It's pandering bullshit and the jokes will be the cringefest of the century. I don't know anyone irl who thinks this will be fun.
>>
>>693834473
1 in a million anon its not good marketing to try and pander to people with something they wont enjoy. should have just made a good ghostbuster movie remade the cartoon sold action hero's to boys which like stuff like slime and ghosts and ghostbusting. dumb jews always trying to shit on everything we enjoy.
>>
>>693810105
>don't voice your opinion
Maybe you should listen to your own words faggot.
>>
>>693833721
Jokes on you, it's doing really well.
>>
>>693817429

> the characters (Especially john belushi)

Did daddy let you use the internet alone, little man? :'D
>>
File: Mint Delicious.png (381 KB, 708x537) Image search: [Google]
Mint Delicious.png
381 KB, 708x537
>>693808771
I tought this was a /b/ elaborated meme, but it really is a movie, just saw the add in my tv 2 days ago, WHAT THE SHIT WERE THEY THINKING?
I AM NOT WATCHING THIS TRASH.
>>
>>693835784
>its doing really well.
>not even out yet
nice denial you got there.
>>
>>693811044
all the things you can suck
>[x]my phallus
>[X]muh rooster
>[X]muh dick
>[X] my shlong
>[X]my male genitalia
>>693813063
Jesus Christ you u like the taste of dick or something mate.your opinion is shit. suck my duck.
>>
Of course the defence against the bad reviews will be that anyone who doesn't like it can't handle strong empowered women blah blah blah, which they will use as their shield for what is a truly terrible movie.

Wonder what these cunts would have to say if Sex in the City was remade with four guys doing the male equivalent.
>>
>>693835719

He literally said don't support it. You must be one hell of a faggot to think not supporting shitty 'reboots' is an opinion.
>>
>>693808771
People in this thread:
>People who think the movie is going to be shit
>trolls
>>
>>693836297
that would never happen. guys dont fall for this horseshit. its why they are pandering to minorities and women. only idots stupid enough to fall for the hollywood hype train.
>>
>>693836297

From what I have understood, Sex and the City is about being a stupid, materialic whore.

In other words, you can't remake it.
>>
>>693831671
OH SHIT! Fuck that! Yokai Watch!
Thread replies: 260
Thread images: 39


Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [Home]
Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [Home]


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.