ITT...well u know
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
ITT...well u know
>>686656776
lol
k
so uh...
>>686657641
lol
to carry on from last thread, moralfags are living in a puritanical bubble comprised of the guilt and shaming misinformation that liberal media has shoved down their throats.
>>686658453
what is this bs
>>686658656
also i was wrong about sweden's consent law, it's 15 not 14. Canada's used to be 14 up until like 5 or 10 years ago
You sit down in your thinking chair and think, think, think.
Yo I just found out Mexico's age of consent is 12.
HAAAALLELUJAH I know where I'm moving once I've got some dosh
WHERE IS BASED CP ANON
>>686658656
What I love is how /b/ is so full of neckbeards who go on about how logical everything needs to be and how society is so weak now because everyone prioritizes feelings over reason. How we all need to more rational and objective.
But then when it comes to underage sex they're always "ITS WRONG BECAUSE IT JUST IS. I DONT NEED EVIDENCE OR REASON. PEDOS ARE EVIL"
>>686659102
but age of consent doens't mean they'll automatically consent
no 12 year old will like your fat and creepy ass
>>686659629
This. Rape is still rape even if they had the chance to consent.
>>686659102
You're right you don't have to worry about the police, the whole community will pommel your gringo ass. Not joking if you did it you would be killed and it'd be slow. And the cops wouldn't give a shit either. A lot of the strict catholic Mexicans if they find out if she had sex at the age of 12 they'd kill you especially if you're white. If you're black don't go in general lol once you get a bit out of the cities in Mexico it's a whole other country
>>686658656
Oh its you from the other thread, the paranoid Amerifag
Vola..?
>>686659831
I get the age of consent and all that, but after 14 its all fair game for me. I knew very well what the fuck I was getting into even before that age.
I'm 27 and I've fucked 15 and 16 year old girls. Wouldn't mind fucking a 14 year old.
>>686659837
this
>>686659406
To be honest, people arguing without an argument pisses me off, however I don't agree with paedophilia, children are fucking dumb; they will regret the decision. Kids are so retarded how will they possibly be sexually responsible??
>>686660026
sounds like a plan.
>>686659406
uhm did you read my comment wrong? I'm saying the opposite. maybe im missing something
>>686659837
>>686660160
meh I'll take my chances, I could probably buy a 12 year old wife down there lol
>>686660086
sure thing buddy
>>686660674
No seriously you'd end up dead for asking
>>686661030
Not my problem, besides he's probably talking out his ass
>>686659406
I've been on /b/ since the beginning, basically, give or take a hiatus here and there. I remember the very beginning of AOL, E-mail, etc. While I am a truly heartless fuckface, hurting a child is simply wrong. I don't say that as holier-than-thou, I say that on behalf of the child. When a pizza image is created, it does, and will forever, hurt a child. While most images on /b/ are not actual pizza, they make sure that underage images are b& for a reason. They can't arbitrate the content and "hope" it's not. As a company, that's simply wise.(I'm old enough to have a profession you fuckstick.)
>>686660418
Adults are rarely responsible when it comes to sex. Why does responsibility even need to be a factor? Sex doesn't really require responsibility.
And why do you assume kids would regret sex? What's to regret about it? Why do you think of sex in negative terms?
Sex isn't a positive or negative thing. It is a thing that exists. The anti-pedo argument assumes that sex is inherently traumatic. That the only people capable of surviving such a horrible ordeal are those whose brains have aged enough to build up the proper mental defenses to cope with sex. This outlook isn't based in any scientific reason at all. It is purely emotional and makes no sense.
>>686661525
>the beginning of e-mail
hahahaha
>>686661598
This, sex is talked about by liberals in such a negative light you'd almost assume none of them get laid.
>>686660524
No I was agreeing with you. Minus the liberal media nonsense. I'm too old for /pol/ logic
>>686661598
The argument of a true desperate pedo
>>686661375
I know I'm just saying people would kill you for doing it, in many areas their are police but they aren't like here, this would be a perfect example of when they would step out of the way and tell the family to handle it. You'd die and be forgotten
>ITT: BUTTHURT CURCUMSIZED AMERIFATS MIRIN CONSENT LAWS
>>686662006
lol because conservatives are so pro-sex? come on man
>>686661525
>>686661598
>>686662099
So you're saying he should try it
>>686662158
That's called stereotyping, nigger.
>>686658453
please tell me this isn't Rob...
>>686661525
I wish you weren't a liar.
>>686661525
Sex doesn't hurt children. Where are you getting that from?
And before you answer about penetration being physically painful for young kids let me just tell you that there are other types of sex besides penetrative sex. You've been on the internet so long you'd think you'd know that by now.
>>686662166
But libertarians are
>>686662594
Fair enough.
>>686662535
I think he means it can be emotionally damaging to the child
What if your in a club and take 1 home and find out she is only 15 in the morning
>>686663096
ask why she lied and told me she was 12.
>>686663083
And what is it about sex that damages emotions? And why doesn't it damage adult emotions?
Just so you all know. Nude pictures of minors aren't illegal. It's only illegal if they are performing sexual acts.
>>686663375
>the bait
Hello Mr FBI
>>686663375
Yeah that's not really true
>>686662535
Dear asshat, while I live in 'murica, and I believe our age of consent laws to be moronic, I don't believe in Captain Planet either.
>and where did I say painful you fucking dipshit
Anything south of puberty is clearly wrong! Not only by mans standards, but natures, since they cannot reproduce.(If you're an Islam fag, fuck off). Likewise, pictures of children will hurt them, regardless of the intentions. The interwebs is now the absolute catalyst for filth. A neverending, smut-filled garbage can. That's what /b/ once was, at its height. Now it's a bunch of normies and newfags like you trying to rationalize the horrendous. That doesn't make you edgy, it makes you a faggot! Congrats!
>>686663375
You wish
Yeah it's true. Look up teen nudists. You'll see minors that are naked. It's not illegal.
>>686663597
>>686663548
I mean it is true. 4chan rules =/= the law
>>686663375
Your ignorance is towering. Look up COPINE and Oliver scales. All of which are counted in for the number of images you get caught with.
>>686663770
>being this retarded
>>686659837
> once you get a bit out of the cities in Mexico it's a whole other country
Yeah. Mexico.
In the major cities, it's pretty much just more of the southern US.
>>686663770
That is protected under a special section of US law, doesn't mean all nude pics are legal
>>686663814
No, but 4chan has to cater it's rules to the laws of the country the site is hosted in
>>686663375
No, eroticism is what makes it illegal, you could get jailed for suggestive clothed pictures of a 16 year old. If it is swxualisation or in a way that it's actually made to stimulate a person sexually it's technically illegal. There are definite cases where under 18 is OK technically but tell that the jury
>>686663375
Whatever you say uncle jack.
>>686664005
*its
Autocorrect is stupid
>>686663375
That's a whole different legal issue there.
Most of that stems from the ability of people to photograph nudist families in public places and not get in trouble if a child happens to be in the frame. This is what the dost test is for.
It determines through the focal point of the camera on the body, and what types of poses the child or teen in question is in.
But seriously, that's a really questionable part of the law in the US to a lot of people, and it;s been up for debate the same way lolicon has been.
>>686663897
No its not at all, it's much much much different in how things work
>>686663770
see
>>686663869
and dont think they dont go through the caches and add every thumbnail to the count that they give the judge.
>>686656776
Omg everyone stfu and post tara vids.
>>686663770
There's a bunch of steps people have to take before they can legally put it on the internet.
>>686656776
stand back, I've got this
>>686663622
>makes a newfag normie argument
>accuses a pedo of being a normie newfag
Inb4 Mods
>>686664361
THIS
