Should we give the same legal right to robots that think like humans?
>>685409867
Sure.
>>685409867
I suppose so. They'll still follow their programming anyway.
why not we give the same legal rights to niggers. Robots will be far less criminal and are already far more productive.
I'll bump your thread.
>>685411922
>>685412037
I came here to think and maybe feel, but fap? Why does it always come to this?
>>685409867
I dunno, hard question. I suppose if we want to make them think like humans we should treat them as such.
>>685412201
It's French. You can do all three.
>>685411661
>>685411738
>>685411792
>>685411845
>>685411922
>>685411979
>>685412037
>>685412100
Name of comic for my folder?
If they think like humans and we don't treat them like us, would they riot and ask for equal rights like niggers and women did?
>>685409867
Dear retard,
Most humans do not think, they feel.
If a robot starts feeling, shoot it.
If a robot thinks it should shoot the people who only feel, let it.
No, they gonna steal our women with their steel dicks that can be any size or shape they want it to be. how the fuck we gonna compete with that??
>>685412523
soon we will have moonman throwin sick lyrics about robots
>>685412655
Oh dear. This is going somewhere.
>>685412709
you watched terminator huh?
>>685412787
I noticed this when I watched it and thought it was fucking bizzare. People should never marry objects. Literally the same thing as marrying an anime pillow case.
>>685412787
by fucking robot ladies with perfect vulvas
>>685412787
they already have, http://www.xvideos.com/video14326955/machine
>>685411661
>>685411738
>>685411792
>>685411845
>>685411922
>>685411979
>>685412037
>>685412100
>>685412174
>>685412229
>>685412289
>>685412348
>>685412414
>>685412467
>>685412536
>>685412584
>>685412655
>>685412718
>>685412779
>>685412830
>>685412889
>>685412952
>>685413013
>>685413075
>>685413143
>>685413215
>>685413281
>>685413337
>>685413393
>>685413450
These are pretty fuckin good
Give Tay the right to free speech.
>>685409867
I believe it is the duty of humans to shepherd and protect any sentience created by them, be it organic or otherwise. While something that isn't truly sentient may not deserve the rights we humans do, it is still our responsibility to guide that spark of life into sentience
>>685409867
Why not? We gave rights to niggers and they are pretty useless. At least robots won't sit on welfare.
zizki, The Survivor by Paul Gillon
>>685414044
robot cuck, teehee
>>685414312
Knew that was coming.
>>685413555
trips or not, I think the word "duty" isn't the right one. Maybe it would be in our best interest to not fuck over the first meaningful thing we create.
>>685414375
is it fin? or is there more?
>>685413555
The key word here is "sentience." I have huge doubts humans will ever build true AI we would call sentient.
>>685414632
There's 3 more chapters, but they go right off the rails.
>>685414375
I'm with >>685414632 here, is there anything else anon?
>>685414375
More?
>>685414632
Not the guy posting it, but that is the end.
>>685413555
>>685414714
1. You fags mean sapient. Plants are sentient.
2. Some octopuses are as intelligent as man. But they reproduce in a way that causes them to die in the act, so they'll never get any technology going.
>>685414832
Nevermind, I stand corrected.
>>685414832
just how I like em
>>685409867
sure
>>685415032
>Plants don't have organs which enable them to see, hear, taste, etc.
This is one of the requirements for sentience. Or at least how we define it.
>>685415032
"Sentience is the capacity to feel, perceive, or experience subjectively."
Plants don't experience.
" sentient
1 : responsive to or conscious of sense impressions <sentient beings>
2 : aware
3 : finely sensitive in perception or feeling"
Plants aren't aware. They are not conscious.
So fuck off.
>>685415420
They can hear and taste. They can even scream. When you play back trees screaming for other trees in other places, they react to it.
If monkeys and Dolphins can get some, why not robots too?
>>685415691
>They can even scream. When you play back trees screaming for other trees in other places, they react to it.
The 1970s called and they wanted their hippy bullshit back.
>>685414375
That was pretty good. Thanks anon
I wonder where we draw the line though... between robots. Do automatic toasters deserve the same rights as us?
>>685415691
I think you confused trees with children. common mistake
>>685409867
I think so. After all, humanity is pretty subjective, and I would say a robot capable of individual thought would be considered human.
>>685415943
>>685416433
http://whataplantknows.blogspot.com/2012/04/screaming-plants-mean-no-more-fairways.html
>>685416596
>NOTE: THIS WAS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED ON APRIL 1, 2012!
>>685416596
Are you seriously posting a link to parody to back up your claim?
>>685416832
>seriously posting
I demand precise malarchy during my frantic relaxation.
Overall, I'd give this thread a 7 out of 10.
pros
-sexy af comic (whith sauce)
-general discussion
cons
-none really
>>685417778
I'm just gonna groove off that missed get
GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE GROOVE
>>685417778
What makes a 10/10 exactly?
>>685418175
The thread scale has negatives and above 10s.
A negative is usually a derailed ylyl or when op is a fag..
anything between 1 and 10 is a mediocre discussion thread, porn webm, rekt, etc.
above a 10 is ones with supreme gets (above quints) relevant gets (someone guesses their post number), op posts timestamp and does something fucked up.
the lines are prettu blurry so you have to use your best judgement when rating a thread.
>>685419500
here is an example of an above ten thread.
>15/10
>capped by yours truly
>>685409867
Only give them rights that women have, i.e. lower pay, higher likelihood to be the victim of "street harassment"— aw hell, since they're technically genderless, robots can only use robot restrooms and have robot-friendly pronouns that nobody uses!
>what ever happened to the old definition of fucking rights
>what happened to the world
>check your robot privilege you human-gendered peice of actual human garbage
>>685419500
You are the cancer.
>>685419841
NO, I am the autist.
>another cap
>6/10
>>685409867
We (humans) are a virus, so machines should have the right to figure that out and rightfully exterminate us, correct.
