So I heard you faggots will argue about anything
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
So I heard you faggots will argue about anything
>>685189141
why argue? this is a shitty thread.
1
>>685189141
it's 8, fuck off nigger
>>685189141
This is shit. It's one.
1
-9
It's 1 faggots. BEDMAS.
you niggers if you use PEMDAS its 9
>>685189141
discalculics say 1
I say 19
9
9-3÷(1/3)+1 = 4
Heres how:
Now with bodmas we go left too right.
6÷(1/3)+1
6÷1 is 6
6÷3 is 2
So
(6/2)=3
3+1
4
Its just some simple nath guys, how in gods great name can you get this wrong?
It is 7, 3 / (1/3) = 1
9-1-1=7
>>685189952
If you actually use order of operations, you get 1. Multiplication/Addition comes before addition or subtraction so we can solve 3/(1/3). From that you get 9. And if we then substitute 9 back into the place of 3/(1/3) we get 9-9+1. Which is 1.
>>685190225
What the fuck
9-3÷(1/3)+1
9-3÷0.3+1
9-9+1
0+1
1
>>685190509
he's right you know
>>685190225
hey bud, just saying your wrong.
>>685190225
>bodmas
>pemdas
>jewdas
Fuck off it's spelt bidmas
Brackets, indicies, division, multiplication, addition subtraction.
>>685190509
arent your suppose to do addition before subtraction or am I just tripping?
>>685190470
>3 / (1/3) = 1
FFS
>>685189371
>>685189384
>>685189474
>>685189672
>>685189786
>>685189906
>>685190004
>>685190048
>>685190225
WOw the Long list if Fagots that cant do math..
>>685189952
Yes, this guy knows whats up . PEMDAS is the not just a suggestion , but a Rule ..
>>685190470
3/(1/3)=9 bud
>>685190934
Hey bud, just saying if you are going to make a dumb statement, at least show your work :)
>>685191030
Both subtraction and addition have the same priority. So you do which ever comes first left to right
WolfromAlpha says it's 1
>>685191354
you dont do (6/6)/(1/3), that like saying 1/(1/3).
You would have to use (6/1)/(1/3) for the original equation to be relevant
>>685189141
Since /b/ loves fractions lets try fractions inside of fractions.
Math is boring
>>685191745
Hate to break it to you, 6/6 is 1.
I was only using 6. Dont add extra numbers to try and make me look dumb. Cause youll only do it to yourself :)
>>685190832
Pay attention niggers, division goes first.
>>685189141
The correct answer is 0.9999...
Anyone who disagrees has nigger level math skills.
>>685191558
If I remember correctly, there are some cases where that order would actually matter, but not for this problem.
Also +1 for the answer equaling 1. It's astonishing how order of operations stumps so many people. Then again, it's hard to tell who's baiting and who actually can't do math.
>>685192260
Riddle me this. Why would you solve the 1/3 before the 3÷1/3?
Both are division.
1/3 = 0,333333333
3/0,333333333 = 9,0000009
9-9,0000009 = 0,00009
1+0,00000009 = 1,00000009
gg ez
What about this
>>685192260
0.9999
Also known as 1, you pretentious faggot
>>685192343
In this case it actually does matter. If you add first its -1. Sub(lile you should) first, 1
>>685192472
1/3 == 3^-1
is exponential
>>685192343
>there are some cases where that order would actually matter
This comes up in conditional convergence for infinite products and infinite series.
It's also important in non-Abelian group multiplication.
>>685192584
Oh man, I can't believe anyone saved these. I made a whole set of these a few years ago. I'll post them.
>>685192871
>>685189141
9-3*3+1
9-9+1
1
got it faggot?
>>685192941
>>685193025
>>685192602
0.9999... is also known as 1
0.9999 is not
nigger
>>685193061
>>685192260
retard... its 1.000000000000.....1
>>685193114
huh
well, shit
I actually thought the answer was 9, but it turns out the way it is written there are implied to be brackets around the 1/3
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=9-3%C3%B7%E2%85%93%2B1
the answer really is 1
>>685189141
>9-3/(1/3)+1
>9-9+1=1
>>685193264
>>685192790
Very tru there. But wouldnt it also be
3^-1/3
>>685193313
>inb4
>there are no ( ) so fuck off it's in order
9-3=6
6/1_3=2
2+1=3
There are no priorities so it's in order you niggers,
>>685191225
>>685192513
>>685190832
THERE IS NO GODDAMN PARENTHESIS THE DIVISION WONT GO FIRST NIGGER
>>685193405
This one here is actually true under the analytic continuation of the zeta function. However, the way it is represented here is facetious.
You're all mentally challenged if you think 3/(1/3) is 1. 9-9+1=1
>>685193588
>>685193429
>Brackets
Why is Captcha purpously trying to stop me from posting?
>>685193429
Autism intensifies
And here is an actual problem for any mathfags.
>>685191147
>>>685189371
>>>685189384
>>>685189474
>>>685189672
>>>685189786
>>>685189906
>>>685190004
>>>685190048
>>>685190225
> WOw the Long list if Fagots that cant do math..
>>>685189952
>Yes, this guy knows whats up . PEMDAS is the not just a suggestion , but a Rule ..
drink bleach
9-3/ONE THIRD+1
9-3/ 1_3 +1 =/= 9-3/ (1/3) + 1
>>685193191
You believe that there is an end to infinitely repeating 0s, and beyond that end, there sits a 1.
Excellent.
9, pemdas
>>685194104
Niggers pemdas isn't the solution for everything
I come up with...
From the creator of "the race card" comes...
The "pemdas card"
>>685193934
yes, there is a theoretical 1, not actual 1
>>685192513
U fuckin retard
its 1.
>>685190225
Oh my god
9-3÷1/3+1
9-(3/1×3/1)+1
9-9+1
1
>>685193104
I'm a nigger. You are a fag.
>>685193429
THERE ARE PRIORITIES!!! YOU CANT JUST GO 1+2÷2 AND SAY ITS 3÷2 YOU DUMB CUNT PRIORITY × AND ÷ ALWAYSSSSSS
>>685191770
its an alternating series, either 1 or 0
>>685196024
>its an alternating series
It can be re-written as an alternating series.
>either 1 or 0
It's not. It's larger than 1.
>>685196253
>It's not. It's larger than 1.
Woops, meant to say smaller.
>>685189141
1
When dividing with fractions remember to keep change and flip
So 3 / 1/3 becomes 3 x 1/3
therefore, 9 - 9 + 1 = 1
But fuck this, i'm sick of seeing a bunch of fake ass smarty pants downplaying people who are doing just fine in life and have abandoned mathematics, for their own ego masturbation
>>685195473
Are you really that retarded that you have to write this cancerous pasta down instead of solving it in like 3 seconds in your head?
>>685196292
More specifically, 0<Λ(2)<1.
>>685196292
meant that when n is sufficiently large enough the limit is either 1 or 0, for a lower n it is indeed just lower than 1
>>685193761
goes to infinity
>>685196501
>meant that when n is sufficiently large enough the limit is either 1 or 0
This is still wrong.
>>685196495
No, idiot, 0>/\(3)<1 where 1 is constant.
>>685196577
care to explain?
>>685196568
No. The factors tend to 1 fast enough that P(8) converges.
>>685196613
i/10
>>685196671
Do you want the answer, or do you just want me to say why it doesn't go to 1 or 0?
>>685196364
Im trying to help the less fortunate here. Im showing my work so maybe some of these retards might learn something.
>>685196795
every factor is larger than 1, multiplying an infinite amount of factors wich are all >1 goes to infinity
>>685193338
no, 3^-1/3 would be 1/cuberoot(3)
just like 3 ^-1/2 would be 1/sqrt(3)
>>685196999
You don't understand limits or infinite products.
>>685197029
tiny brain
>>685197173
how so, both those statements are correct
>>685197097
look, nomatter how large n becomes P will always get larger with every n. if you think you know better please give a valid explanation
>>685197339
niarb ynit
>>685197361
>if you think you know better please give a valid explanation
I do know better. Give me a moment to write it out.
Also, this is very well established mathematics.
9-3/1/3+1
9-1+1
8+1
9
Ez
.999999......... for sure
>>685197489
got it. bait is bad bait.
>>685196327
That would not become a 9 it would be a 1 because 3*1/3 is 3/3
>>685197684
>>685197912
but its 3 divided by 1/3 not multiplied.
>>685197858
You're stupid if you don't see the flaw.
>>685189141
9 - 3 ÷ ⅓ + 1
9 - 3 ÷ 1 ⅓
6 ÷ 1 ⅓
4.5
ANyone that wants the formula, here.
You multiply 3x3 which is 9. 9 -9 is 0. +1 is 1.
There's no parenthesis so you divide/multiply first.
>>685189952
Multiplication and Division then Addition and Subtraction, left to right to illiterate troglodyte.
its 9 u fucking retards
you do -3 divided by 1/3, you get -1
then you do 9-1, you get 8,
then you add the 1 and you get 9.
>>685198329
When you divide by a fraction you flip it
>>685190509
this
>>685197508
I cannot spend the time to fully explain the foundations for the existence of infinite series and infinite products from basic real analysis using the delta epsilon definition. It would take too long and I don't think it would be helpful.
Here Π is product, or multiply. Similarly Σ is to sum.
∈ means element of and P is the set of prime numbers. So to write p∈P means let p be a prime number. When it is written under Πa(p) it means multiply over all a(p) where p is prime.
I don't think this explanation is very down to Earth, but you can try putting ζ(8)(ζ(8)/ζ(16)) into Wolfram alpha to see that this is indeed the value. I skipped showing the values for ζ(8) and ζ(16) because that requires another proof.
>>685200892
Two slight errors, the general factor of the second product in step 2 should be (1+p^-s) And The general factor for the third product in step 2 should read (1-p^-(2s))(1-p^-s)^-1.
>>685189141
9 - 3 ÷ ⅓ + 1
Lets start with priorities. So we divide first.
Now 3 ÷ ⅓ = 9
why?
If you divide fractions you have to take the opposite of the 2nd fraction
THEN multiply the 1st fraction with the 2nd so its 3/1 * 3/1 or 9/1
9 - 9 + 1 = 1
>>685189371
Correct, if you follow pedmas
I got -1
>>685190225
You can't just add parenthesis like that, you changed the problem
The order of operations is the standard procedure which to evaluate an expression. It was created to get rid of annoyances when writing math down. So an expression like (4)*(x^3) + (3*(y^2)) can be written down as 4x^3 + 3y^2. PEMDAS and BODMAS are standards created so that people don't get different answers for the same expression. Because of these standards you can't just execute them in any order you wish because of the inconsistencies that would arise. Using PEMDAS and BODMAS you get 1, which is the correct answer. If you think that you can just evaluate expressions in the order you choose many formulas and equations don't work anymore. There's a standard for a reason.
>>685191770
Since I'm heading off. I'd like to clear up that this is the natural logarithm of 2.
>>685202987
The parentheses aren't the problem
>>685192472
anon is right it's 3 over 1, then divide by 3, like 3 / 1 / 3 if you follow pedmas, so the correct answer is 9
>>685199648
But that's what he did, you missed something
>>685203355
It's 3 / (1/3) because it's written as a fraction.
>>685200024
You're not diving by the fraction, you divide the first 3 by the numerator, then the result by the denominator. Division, left to right. This is literally 3rd grade math.
>>685189141
>ITT: faggots argue about anything
>>685202912
When you get to 9-9+1=
Aren't you supposed to add before you subtract
so… 9-9+1=
9-10= -1?
>>685190225
LOL you guys are fuckin stupid
you guys think the 1/3 has to be separated but in such eqaution 1/3 means (1/3).
kill your dumbass uneducated sevles
>>685203828
Addition and subtraction are essentially the same operation, so you go left to right.
>>685203828
Quality bait, and I'll take it -9+1 = -8
>>685189141
I got 9
>>685204094
ohh. None of my teachers made that clear
>>685190968
the E is if exponents? indices have nothing to do with this
1
Ez
>>685189141
If we use the order of operations then dividing would come first. 3/0.33 is 1. Next would come adding, 1 + 1 is 2. Finally subtraction is last, 9 - 2 is 5. The answer is 5.
19
>>685205116
How is 3/0,333=1
Holy shit you're a fucking dumb fuck
>>685205116
Put that division in any calculator. Fucking dumbass.
>>685190225
You are wrong dude...
9-3*(1/3)+1=
=9-3:3+1=
=9-1+1=
=9-0 ,so it is 9
Never do maths again, plz
>>685205354
(3/1)÷(1/3)=9
9-9=0
0+1= 1
Alright faggots.
Fucken first do the division 3 divided by 1/3 is 3 times 3 which equals 9, next do the first part because when its at plus and minus, start from left to right, 9 minus 9 is zero, zero plus one is one. End of fucking story. No other answer.
>>685205695
its not 3 times 1/3 its 3 divided by 1/3 stupid ass
>>685190470
Can u read? It is PLUS 1 at the end.
>>685205777
What has anything to do with my post
>>685205354
Holy shit your a bigger dumb fuck
>>685191147
https://www.mathway.com/
>>685189141
The answer is clearly over 9000
>>685205695
You have to divide by 1/3 not multiply. If you want to multiply, you have to flip it, so 3 times 3 equals 9
>>685206007
How am I dumb you fucking tard
I'm asking him how the fuck he got 1 from 3/0,333
Kill yourself nigger
>>685193588
It's also true for the 2-adic numbers, and the proof you presented is completely valid under them because the sum is actually convergent.
This is fun, keep dumping.
Also, where is the problem in >>685192941 ? I can't see why this is wrong.
>>685205966
I ment to reply to the moron you replayed to now I'm the moron.
>>685205879
Well, fuck. I am drunk as fuck and can't really see anymore. You are right. It is 9-9+1, so it is 0+1=2
>>685206086
Yes, just realized it. But i am drunk and faded as fuck and can still do some kind of dimple math in some way and talk in a different language, so i think i got that going for me
>>685189141
It's 9 fucktards. You can even punch it in a calculator....don't even know their order of ops
9-3/(1/3)+1
9-9+1
0+1
1
>>685206727
It is 1
Calculate it with math plz
>>685206727
Jk it's 1....time to go hang
>>685205116
>3/0.33...=1
kek
>>685206343
>Also, where is the problem in >>685192941 (You) ?
Because it goes from treating x as a continuous variable to one that is instead discrete.
>>685206912
And as for more of those images, those were all of them.
>>685206912
Oh oh oh, yeah. I always forget calculus and discrete variables don't play nice together.
>>685203828
Yeah
>>685207522
>I always forget calculus and discrete variables don't play nice together.
They really do hate each other. But there are some funny places where they do play nice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_0NuOBNobk
At one point in this lecture a switch is made from continuous to discrete and everything works out fine!
>>685207798
Ooh, Ramanujan. I'll have to watch that then. I just finished up my last final, so I'm more than ready for some recreational math.
A friend of a friend spent a long time trying to develop the idea of a discrete integral. I don't know if you probably can't, but I know it caused all sorts of problems.
>>685208692
>so I'm more than ready for some recreational math
For recreation math pertaining to Ramanujan I'd recommend the theory of partitions or nested radicals as a good place to start.
The analog of the integral in the discrete case is Σ.
If you are interested in alternative integrals then you'd liek this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_derivatives_and_integrals_in_alternative_calculi
>>685189141
9-3/(1/3)+1
3/(1/3) = 3*(3/1) = 3*3 = 9
=> 9-9+1 = 1
Parentheses/brackets
Exponents/indices
Multiplication/division
Addition/subtraction
All these pairs are either synonyms in the context of math or mathematically equivalent operations
If you think multiplication comes before division for instance, you're wrong
Addition before subtraction, wrong
The reason you go left to right within a given step in the order of operations is that the subtraction and division symbols are asymmetrical and must be done left to right
The only correct answer is 1, no ambiguity only facts
