She's not going to outright destroy America. She's going to let it continue to stagnate. It'll be 8, long years of nothing, and at the end America won't be much worse, but everywhere else will be another 8 years better.
If you honestly think she'll just destroy it, you're delusional imo.
Sorry, but if you don't vote for the 1st woman president who's owed the presidency on behalf of women who have never had it, then you're a sexist.
Everyone on my campus knows if you say you support Republicans or Trump instead of Hillary Clinton then you're a sexist and you will be protested and formally complained about through the official channels. There was some Trump supporter who was protested straight off campus, and another person who was saying Hillary Clinton should be in prison which violated the rules of the area and group he was in so he was also stopped.
At what point is hate speech gone too far? Is OP's thread even legal if you consider the overall impact on underprivileged people (women) when the 1st woman president is treated disrespectfully?
She's destroying it now by not dropping out. She's going to losse badly against Trump if she manages to get the nomination. Bernie is the only person who can defeat trump in November, not someone who is under an FBI investigation.
Trump won't have enough power to destroy America. You're overestimating how much the president matters. Shit doesn't change much under each presidency because the real power isn't there.
Trump will be fine. Tbh I have more hope for him than Hillary -- at least Trump might bring the republican party back to sanity (conservativism), after so many years of it being controlled by religious nutjobs. I'm glad to see him getting elected: people like Cruz, Carson, Santorum, etc. shouldn't even be in American politics.
I'd be OK with a Trump or Bernie presidency as they both represent returning their respective parties to their roots.
could it be i just stand for equality?
women haven't been president and so Hillary Clinton is basically owed her turn at the presidency. that's called equality. if you don't give women a chance by voting for Hillary Clinton then you are on some level a sexist, and if society doesn't elect her then yes that means society is on some level incredibly sexist.
>im a woman and that should give me everything. Even though im unqualified and there are better people for the job, i have a vagina and that matters more.
You want equality, earn it. Having a vagina isnt special be as good and yoh will be treated the same.
If they have to give it to you based on your crotch you arent and were never equal and won't ever be until you earn it.
Hillary's campaign has said she pays for shills. It's not made-up.
Whether they come to 4chan is up in the air, but I wouldn't put it past them to assign one or two people out of thousands to 4chan.
Mmmm, no hon. That's not how it works. How it works is this: women haven't had the presidency, women have been oppressed by society since the beginning, and now women are owed the presidency.
You can't deny that if you don't vote for Hillary Clinton then subconsciously or consciously you are sexist. Well I guess you can deny it, but nobody will believe you. Do you want your friends and family to know you're a sexist? Don't you want to prove you aren't a sexist?
Americans need to elect Hillary to prove the US isn't sexist. It's the most important issue by far to make sure women are equal and show that you respect women by voting the right way.
Depends on how out of touch with online culture the people who set up the shills are. Anyone familiar with 4chan knows that Hillary shills would be indistinguishable from trolls, and that there's no point to sending shills here because it'd just get lost in the noise... But the fact that they're even sending shills to online communities shows they're out of touch.
>stand for equality
I'm not going to pretend the US is perfect but there are disadvantages for BOTH women and men in the US and neither are that compared to other countries like Saudi Arabia or Afghanistan.
Women are free and equal enough to get into politics, there's no "evil patriarky" conspiracy trying to stop them for no beneficial reason. The only reason no women have been president is because much less went for it than men.
This doesn't apply to all women but much less women aim for power than men, either that or third wave feminism has caused women in the West to have a victim complex and blame everything on "the patriarchy" rather than sorting out their problems by themselves. I noticed there have been a lot less female scientists and inventors after third wave feminism. Oh the irony.
Indians. (both kind)
Each havent had the presidency why should a raging cunt get it first.
Why not play a game to tell who gets it. Try Russia Roulette.
You're an autist high schooler or just fucking inbred... There's no way you think the ONLY reason is because less women wanted roles of power.... Or you just don't know a damn thing about world history prior to 1990.
So how'd that "prove you are not racist" vote go? Obama was electec, but now we have more "black lies matter" movements Than ever before... Go back to Tumblr please. I'll be over in a few to post some sweet gore for ya. K hun?