Half the kids at my school who did science fair got pissed. Some kids try to develop their own project for motnhs/years and this kid literally had things handed to him. the anger is real
Am I supposed to rage because some retard used black text on a black background?
Meanwhile, pic related grinds my gears.
How do fiscal conservatives convince themselves that 1% of the people create/deserve 34% of the wealth?
I'm not 'murican, but still:
5 That's discrimination and stupid, so no
6 That's for too steep, so no
7 Fine with the fingerprint and transmitter when the gun is not owned by a single individual, otherwise no to those and the punishment is far too harsh, so no.
8 That's discrimination, so no
11 Refer to 7 about the GPS, otherwise it should be a VOLUNTARY turning for the weapons. And why the fuck should the seizure cost go from your pocket. So no.
12 Too specific and time consuming to actually be worth it, so no
Kek u mad? Best part is he probably wrote those letters too.
I mostly have feminism rage stuff but its still rage
I actually cannot fucking believe people still sympathise with him. he was not "just pointing his fingers", he was acting very aggressively towards an office with his weapon drawn because he believed the idiot had a gun
Fucking fuck I lost hard
Bitch desrtves a buckshot in her ugly face for not knowing math 101 and for being a retarded feminist.
If you let your sexuality identify you, you aren't a maverick, free spirit, and you certainly aren't going against the grain as extreme as you think you are. You're basically limiting yourself to a conversation piece that can literally go NOWHERE. People like this aren't annoying because they're different. They're annoying because they think they are interesting but outright identifying as these things before saying anything of substance proves that they're just boring normies like everybody else.
I like broccoli, but it's not part of the speech I give to people when introducing myself.
good one, already lost.
his argumentation though...
>men head of housholds for majority of history
biased, patriarchy wasn't all, But yes... shure natural like everything
>women incable of fieldwork
not shure about that........buuuuut....
>willingness to sacrifice bodies for benefit of family
ya, seems like a reason, why men had to take the job of hard labour on them... bcause women neeeded to stay fit for healthy childs
but--- we're not in the 13h century anymore.
This woman's face is just so punchable. I hate looking at it so much.
They didn't use victim, or casualty, or some other term to describe her hurt feelings. No, SURVIVOR, she barely got out of that comment section alive.
nah, they had to stay fit to bear lots of children. look at the history of how many children there were born per woman. You can't mine if u have to spend so much time bearing children. Men were just faggots and thought they can't speak up. Till htey thought they can and then thought they were better. Problem is that idiots reprodce more
>implying implications that were not implied
Just because there should obviously be a difference in rich and poor doesn't mean that the just difference is hundreds of millions of times greater.
The rich have been getting richer for decades and decades. This is not sustainable.
It's always amusing to be told you don't understand economics by someone who was "taught" economics by a small handful of catchphrases thrown around by politicians that are completely and totally bought off by the top 1%.
That or the kid is the smartest of them all, fooling half a nation and all the influential people in it. Also wasn't his little "clock" just a cheap walmart clock that was taken out of it's original case?
While he probably should've gone with a taser if he had one, I still think he was justified in the circumstances. The dude had his hand behind his back as if he was holding a weapon and was acting extremely aggressively. If he had had a weapon, especially a gun, if the cop hadn't fired when he did there would have been a strong chance he would've have come out worse in that situation
I'm not fully familiar with US regulations on use of lethal force (am britbong) but I'd imagine it's permissible if the officer's life is threatened of if the officer has good reason to believe that's the case. In this situation, I think he was justified
>be an idiot who acts stupid in front of a cop
>therefore you must die lol xD
Are you being serious or just pretending to be this retarded? Cops in other countries magically manage to handle idiots acting up without instantly drawing lethal weaponry and blowing people away. An officer's gun should be the last resort.
Let's swap this up a little
>okay, how about we start with you having NO right to complain, huh? sound easy enough? despite you having white/upperclass privilege to wear anything you want, you decided (for some reason) to wear a short skirt and revealing top. seeing a beautiful girl stroll in bliss in the midst of depravity probably made their juice flow, and having enough sense not to rape you due to the rage they and their people have felt for practically forever, they let you off easy and just touched/groped you. grow the fuck up and learn how easy it is the be a female in this country
As a guy you have the privilege of being responsible for your own fucking life. You goof'd it. That's on you. I've goof'd too, but I learned from it.
Don't be bitter that a woman acted like a woman. It was in the scorpion's nature to sting the rabbit. The rabbit couldn't really blame the scorpion for its nature, could it?
As far as I know, it's different for each state, but I've always heard that lethal force is permissible if the officer deems that the individual is currently a danger to the lives of people or if him escaping would lead to the harm of others.
>It's always amusing to be told you don't understand economics by someone who was "taught" economics by a small handful of catchphrases thrown around by politicians that are completely and totally bought off by the top 1%.
The top guys are fucking us, for sure, but they literally run the country. Could you set up distribution of goods from Porland to Miami? To Jew York to San Diego? Wal Mart can. Target Can. AMazon can get any of these products to your goddamn front door in 3 days.
You way overestimate the average citizen. The average person is a goddamn worthless fuck that would sit on their ass and do fuck all if they had even the slightest chance to do so. Without the mega businesses, we'd have literally nothing. Yeah, you'd have some nice mom and pop stores, but they wouldn't offer the same that the big stores do.
And if you don't like it, you can always go elsewhere. It's not perfect, they fuck us over with tax havens and stuff, but we're pretty much stuck with it.
>pretend to be really rich
>ask a poor girl out
>we go to a posh restaurant
>i promise to pay
>order a four course meal
>tell her i'm just stepping outside for a fag
>a sucker is born every minute
Let's say somehow the antigunners magically got the votes to overturn the 2nd Amendment, who's going to come and confiscate all of those weapons? Welcome to Civil War 2: Electric Boogaloo.
I'm not a MGTOW, because MGTOWs are fucking retarded.
I was simply pointing out that if a guy gets friendzoned or taken advantage of emotionally, that's on him. What's the alternative? That we sit around and pity him? For what fucking reason? He can learn or he can die off.
>EXACTLY who were the "intelligent" people fooled?
MIT as well as a huge number of other very intelligent people. Didn't he get sent a ton of shit from google and apple? Someone like that, who wanted to celebrate innovation and shit. Hoodwinked, every one of them. It can happen to the best.
1. Good luck getting a new amendment through congress
2. That's literally pointless and impossible to implement. The number of all firearms is not known.
3. >Some guy who failed a "mental health check" enters a guns store/police station/military base/security company
>everyone goes to jail
4. People are sceptical of psych evaluation and for good reasons. Psychiatry is for the largest part still a pseudoscience and in no way usable for determining anything serious. The psychiatric methods used 50 years ago are considered crude and pointless today and todays methods will be considered crude and pointless in 50 years.
5. I'm not that familiar with the American tax system, but I'm pretty sure that federal taxes don't work that way
6. Good idea in theory but ultimately it's impractical.
7. >liberals thinking they know shit about technology
8. On what basis?
9. I don't even know what that could possibly accomplish apart from wasting tax money.
10. >Liberals thinking they know shit about ammunition
11. >'''''''assault rifles'''''''
>will be seized by the government
12. >Obongo can do whatever he wants because he is president and sheit
>Yeah just never try to stop women from lying
What's the point? Human beings are horrible little critters. Take a human, slap a pair of tits and a pussy on them, and suddenly they'll be showered in compliments and special treatment here in the west. That makes for a conceited, self-entitled asshole of a human being. This will never change. Therefore, you toughen up or you lie down and die.
>Also, if a man takes advantage of a woman, you'd have the exact same thing to say, but with the genders reversed, right?
A woman doesn't have to learn, because there's a practically infinite amount of dicks lined up. A man has to be on his game to get anything. It doesn't matter if a woman sits around and sobs about how this or that man was an asshole. A man who does the same for any amount of time is a sad and pathetic cunt that won't get laid (unless he's very wealthy or have something else that gives him high status).
Women don't care for emotional men. They already have one pussy, so why would they want another?
Why didn't he just punch one of them when they asked for his phone?
Or at least when they started to grab on his wife? Fuck. Have we become so passive of a society?
There's no way the mental health system, overstretched as it is, could supports millions of extra people who need a full examination to keep their weapons or get new ones. And (in most states) there's already a licensing system that checks for that kind of stuff.
It's the kind of thing that makes sense in theory, but is in no way practical to apply, especially when you ask the question "Who pays for all these highly educated medical professional workhours?"
give me 30% of your worthless shit retard
Software Engineer here.
Code on the left is one of the most influential and groundbreaking pieces of code ever written.
Code on the right is a really shitty way to do a basic comparison. It has redundancies and is very inefficient.
TL;DR: The code on the left was written by a man and revolutionized the graphics programming industry. Code on the right was written by a dumb whore.
I have become confusion, destroyer of trains of thought
I will be that Euro fuck and just say: Fucking drop your military to half and there's the money, though honestly there are better things to do with it than make sure every redneck and ghettokid doesn't murder each other.
Retard detected. Labor produces everything. Always has. They own therefore they are entitled to take the fruits of production by a corrupt legal system. Have you ever seen a boss do anything but take? Can you name an actual task in any company that an owner is responsible for? other than depositing the money we make for them?
You fucking retards piss me off.
Honestly, the odds of blanket mental health screening catching anyone who intends to harm themselves or another are extremely low, at least compared to general licensing.
Even if the government couldn't come up with this level of cash, it's a huge waste of time.
Haven't done much web programming because frankly its an oversaturated market that is very easy to break into.
So my only advice is to pick one of the core 3 (CSS, HTML, JScript) and master it. Build a nice portfolio website. Try to find contracting work or try to get hired somewhere as a Junior. Best of luck.
What pisses me off more is that he didnt understand what lock meant. Put a fucking password lock on it. Story is bullshit who locks a laptop in a chest drawer rather than putting a password lock on it
I know the feels as I have a feminist teacher.
Wish you luck anon.
>this guy might have a gun
>I have reason to believe he has a gun
>he's pulling the gun
>well I shouldn't shoot him because what if he doesn't
>oh shit he's shooting me
>oh well, at least I didn't kill an unarmed man in an act of self preservation
>punching niggers in a nigger area
>thinking he wouldn't be instantly killed by a horde of niggers chanting "Kill Whitey"
like i said not one intelligent person was fooled. but a bunch of progressive cuck-tards jumped all over this... MIT, Apple, Google, Microsoft and Obama all kissed his dirty shitskin taint
I'd say worth it.
Gotta stand up for yourself no matter what.
>>>/tg/ related rage
>6 minute mile
>weekly exercise sessions
oh, i didnt realize people preparing for the fucking olympics only need to workout three days a week, which is what you get interpolating from that statement.
Actually that's often true. Queen's english vs. Other dialects/varieties. In some cases, it can be argued that certain rules are beneficial in that they increase intelligibility, but in many cases differences in punctuation, grammar, spelling are really only different: just look at the plethora of disagreements listed between MLA and Chicago MoS, for example.
No destroy there social life by accusing all their friends and family of rape. They either believe you and turn their backs on their friends and family or they prove how much of a hypocrite they are.
Did this bitch notice that she left out so many factors?
They were by the same company, but they weren't the same razor just marketed with different colors. If they were the same exact thing, she would be right. But, no, you're a dumbass. Back in the kitchen.
>she barely got out of that comment section alive.