Magnets are free and limitless energy. Prove me wrong
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Magnets are free and limitless energy. Prove me wrong
>>684111904
Eventually someone will closed your looped gif and it won't work anymore
>>684111904
They are not. Prove me wrong
>>684111904
they loose the magnetic power with friction or shock
its actually pretty easy to stop a magnet from working
take a freezer magnet from the kitchen and throw it on the ground as hard as you can
you will notice that the power reduced drastically
>>684112093
Solution: dont throw your energy-generating magnets on the ground
>>684112093
But where does the magnetism go?
>>684111904
Friction losses, wear, shock losses from impact, field disturbance
>>684112315
>they loose the magnetic power with friction or shock
>friction
just by using the field you are generating friction and magnetic disturbance
this wheres the magnet off
>>684112421
Dunno your mum and dad have been asking the same question for years now
But how do they work?
>>684111904
Then tell me, why is the ball attracted when going up, but droped conveniently when it has to go down?
With a precise alignment of magnets, it is possible to create a field that can make a motor for instance much more efficient, however it is not possible to "create" energy as the negatives outweigh the positives.
>>684111904
>limitless
No. The pieces of gravity inside of the magnet will eventually spill out and then they won't be magnets anymore. Read a book sometime.
>>684111904
and if they are used at the expense and limitation of anothers energy, and they still free, without limits?
>>684112093
No they don't. This is false thinking. But they're still not sources of energy, they simply generate a magnetic field around themselves in which ferromagnetic things have potential energy. They release energy when moving closer to the magnet and need it to move away. And like with gravity and electric fields, any path which starts and ends in the same location relative to the magnet has a net energy output/sink equal to zero.
>>684112860
I know its bait but
>pieces of gravity
Magnetism is like gravity. It's a force, not an energy.
>>684112421
the electron spin configurations reorient so that they are not all uniform, so the magnetic field produced by each charge is nullified by neighboring charges that have an opposite spin
>>684112860
"How do magnets work?"
Published by the United Oil, Gas, and Electricity Companies
>>684113113
MODS MODS MODS
>>684113069
It's not bait. I studied at Yale for years to get my degree in Geology. I think I know what I'm talking about.
>>684113101
Forces can create energy dumbass
>>684111904
So if the magnet COULD pull the ball from that far away, why would it fall when it got that close?
So fake
1/10 for making me respond.
Magnets lose their magnetism over time.
I know this because I deal with veteran vehicles, which has magnetic flywheels. They have to be remagnetized to work properly.
>>684113260
Yes but only in one way. So, you have to give to the object the same amount of energy to recharge its "force".
>>684113216
Ever shop at a local vegetarian store
>>684112609
daily dose of kek
>>684111904
>the fact that you had to loop your gif isn't enough proof already this wouldn't work
>>684113216
>Yale
>degree
You're in the wrong place sonny
>>684113592
It's not totally correct. "Potential energy" = force * distance.
>>684111904
What is friction
The magnet at the top is on an electric charge on and off. On pulls magnet to the top then switches off, dropping it.
>>684113898
It's resistance to a movement. Ex, Air create a force that reduce the speed of an object.
>>684113871
>"Potential energy" = force * distance
What.
Force time distance gives Work done by displacement along the direction of force.
This work equals the change in potential energy of the object, if the force is due to a conservative field.
"Potential energy" is NOT force*distance
>>684114138
That's actually not friction anon. The air resistance is due due to the viscosity of air, which is a fluid. It's a different process than friction, which is generally between solids, and is due to weak electrostatic force.
>>684111904
Remove all friction from that system and it'll keep going on forever. It will not generate energy though. Add even the slightest bit of friction and it'll stop, meaning that only the energy you put into the system was used while zero was generated.
>>684111904
So are we all pretending we can't see the actual skip in the video where it loops?
>>684114295
What about a magnetic ball in space spinning extremly fast in a circle and its incased by a coil. Will it generate electricity.
>>684114682
The ball will just stop eventually. Energy in the form of electricity is nothing more than a combination of the electric field and magnetic field. Both interact with one another in different ways to deliver you what people refer to as "electricity". The moment you generate a current, it's the moment you have "friction". You can take it to even more extreme extents and say "I'll just use a super conductor", but even that is bound to generate "friction". To put it in even simpler terms, if you've ever measured a battery under no load, you'll see the results are completely different than in actual load. THAT is the effect of a low "friction" system vs a high "friction" one.
>>684114682
Generating electricity creates friction,
>>684114682
There's a problem with this, eddy current braking will occur even with a superconductor.
>>684114256
I'm used to talk about the "air friction" in aerodynamism. But you're right, there's also vaccum effect ans others things due to fluid physics.
i dont always strawman but when i do i make sure its schizophrenic af
>walking dsm diagnosis guilty
>>684111904
why doesn't the steel ball just stick to the magnet?
>>684112075
underrated post
>>684113216
>I think
There's the problem