Well what DO YOU have to say about this then?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Well what DO YOU have to say about this then?
>>677632403
well it's quite easy, if there is one key that can open every lock in the world it's considered a master key.
If there's a lock that can be opened with every key it's a lousy lock
>>677632403
Its retarded
guy is a moron and will likely become a cuckold one day. If you extend his logic then it doesn't matter if a chick is sexually loyal to you or not anymore. Since women get sex easy and he won't.... she can get his money and go fuck whoever she likes. Dude's a moron.
Its easy for a girl to be a slut, harder for a guy to be a player. The judgement comes from the difficulty
This random fag trying 2 get laid with this gay shit. What a pathetic fuck
>>677632403
That it is disgusting if a girl has slept with a lot of dudes.
If we think in the spectra of evulotion: A women shall have sex with a strong man which can provide her and her child a safe home with food etc etc.
A man shall have sex with as many womyns as possible because that make the offspring strong and healthy.
If a girl sleeps with an weak unhealthy man and if an week and unhealthy man have a lot of sex with different womens, then the offspring will be nignog.
>>677632403
Technically correct, although everybody still gets to chose their favorites.
Turns out men favorite women with fewer sexual partners.
>>677632712
Yeah, too bad we arent talking about keys.
>>677632712
Shit like this proves how /b/ and sandniggers are exactly the same attitude wise.
Muslims are also really proud of their "burqas are good because would you rather pick up and eat a wrapped or unwrapped candy" non-argument.
>>677632403
Personally, I agree with him and do not care at all about my partners’ sexual histories. The one caveat is health complications stemming from those histories (including children). Those affect me and therefore I care. Otherwise, her past business is just that; HER business.
>>677633278
Goddamn learn to speak English
>this is my favorite thing ever
>when you [insert mundane activity]
>*mic drop*
>HE ACTUALLY DID THE THING
God I fucking hate what the Internet has become. I wish we could just nuke the entire fucking thing and be done with it. That pertains to both the soft-spoken whiteknight e-celeb cuck in OP's image as well as the repliers. I want it all gone, clean slate. What a shitty hobby we all share.
>>677633479
Preference = discrimination, shitlord
>>677632403
Cucks like this is why Islam is taking over.
50 years from now women won't even be allowed to be seen in public much less fuck 40 men.
>>677632403
He's saying as if I asked him I don't want you to have eaten so many cereal in the past but I'm not asking that. I don't want me be with weird moldy cereal
>>677634100
Yeah, I don't buy that far into the SJW narrative,
>>677633278
>If a girl sleeps with an weak unhealthy man and if an week and unhealthy man have a lot of sex with different womens, then the offspring will be nignog
But there's no reason why there should even be any offspring. You have an emotional response to an evolutionary fact. Yes, if we were cavemen, you'd be right. However, we're not.
I am grossed out by sluts too. I don't want to be in a relationship with one. However, it's not a logical approach to the situation, is it?
>>677632403
by cheerios he must mean his cock rings
>>677633839
lol
>>677632725
Rage harder faggot then kill yourself
>>677633774
We're damn sure not talking about cereal either, though, nigger.
>>677633923
True bruh
>>677632403
All I have to say to that is, that this guy is either not very smart, or he has a past he'd like to hide.
The fact of the matter is that who they are and how many sexual partners you've had tells more about a person than most people would like to admit. The people who don't care about things like that, often don't' care about other important shit, and that's fine. They can do whatever the fuck they want, but I'm not going to lower my standards because somebody has some degenerate sexual addiction or is so self-conscious of their sexual history that they have a fucking cow about bringing it up because they know they're gross.
>>677634100
Hope that this is a joke.
No, there is a fucking difference.
For one, cocks are disgusting; if I gave you the choice between paying 100 bucks for a fake vagina sex toy that 9 other men have used over several years, or 100 bucks for a brand new one, what would you fucking choose? End of the day, Vaginas cost the same no matter how many men previously came in them. And I don't want my dick in anything another man has had his dick in. That's just fucking disgusting, and gay.
Two, women judge. Every second you're fucking her, she's comparing you to every other guy she fucked. She won't admit it but she does. And when she "closes her eyes so she can finally orgasm"? She's not doing it because pleasure, she's imagining her past boyfriend still fucking her.
And when she says she won't do anal because "it hurts"? How does she know? "I tried it a few times with my last boyfriend". Not only was she willing to give him a piece of herself that she's not willing to give you, this guy has fucked up the experience for you by making it hurt, and no amount of begging and "I'll show you how it's done properly babe! It won't hurt!" will ever convince her otherwise.
That's no different to her saying,"I've ridden the cock carousel all those years I was horny, now that I'm not anymore I just want to settle down and let you pay for allll my stuff while refusing to fuck you, because I've had more than enough fucking from the past 18 boyfriends." All the problems, none of the benefits. Would you put up with that? Of course not. But you're happy for her to make ultimatums of you based on past experiences with other men.
You cucks who don't give a shit about sexual history really SHOULD give a shit about sexual history.
We're allowed to be uncomfortable with other people's sexual people and comparing women's sexual history to eating cereal is a false equivalence.
>>677635232
Completely this. Any girl who has sex with a lot of people has significant underlying issues that causes their promiscuity.
>>677632403
Yeah but it shows you are unsure as to which cereal you like, and after indulging in mine, will likely want to move on to other cereals or become bored with me. And I being a person that wants a monogamous relationship, does not feel that can be found with someone who has more than 5 partners a year. Im looking for someone who appreciates stability more than that.
>>677632403
He makes a good point. Who cares how many people you or your ex have been with previously? If they are faithful to you then that's all that matters.
Think of it as all just practise to be good for you
>>677632403
men and women are held to different standards,
For a woman to a virgin She is pure
For a man to be a virgin he is a loser.
Women exacerbate this idea.
>>677635353
>I don't want my dick in anything another man has had his dick in
Once you get out of high school, enjoy a lifetime of fucking women that no other men have wanted.
Or pedophilia. Those are your two options.
>>677635666
see>>677635580
Its called judgement, and its what you do when people are showing a pattern but are unwilling to admit to the behavior
>>677635789
Score. You make it sound like a bad thing, but I'm down for both options.
>>677635353
Lol, you sound mad breh
>>677632403
Cheerios called and said that it's obvious your love is cheap and easily given as well as easily taken away.
It's the same as with a job history. In some areas or positions you want a rich and diversified history because you don't mean to create a long lasting relationship, you just have an immediate need and want the best person to fill it.
In others, you are going to invest much in this person and there is a deep commitment and risk involved with how much you will reveal to them and just simply give to the person outright. If that person seems fickle, it would be a waste or a loss to take them on. There are better more deserving candidates whose history shows loyalty and commitment to their obligations.
You fucking idiot.
>>677632403
Because, you're not sleeping with just one woman, you're sleeping potentially with all the other STD givers that fucked her.
So yeah, prefer small numbers.
A person's actions speak much louder than their words. Someone who has to have scores of sexual partners to feel comfortable, complete, or validated, usually has some serious deficits in judgement, discernment, and emotional competence.
Look, a lot of people are bottom feeders, there's no doubt, and I don't want anything to do with them. It's that simple.
You all can have a fucking orgy of bottom feeding for all I care, but we'll be up here laughing at your deficits as human beings. Nobody is equal, but some people are more equal than others.
ITT:
Virgin, losers, fatties, uggos all desperately trying destroy the sex fun everyone else is having...
LOL you are literally pathetic.
Kill yourselves losers.
women are fucking.
men are fucking.
get used to it.
go back to 1970
>>677633278
>A women shall have sex with a strong man which can provide her and her child a safe home with food etc etc
>A man shall have sex with as many womyns as possible because that make the offspring strong and healthy
First, your logic makes no sense. How does sleeping with many women make offspring strong and healthy? It may make it more likely that some of them are strong, just because of the numbers involved. But no more likely than if a man selected one good, healthy, strong mate to begin with.
Second, your logic contradicts itself. If women should find one man strong enough to care and provide for her children, then wouldn't a man having many children by many women make it less likely that they could care an provide for any of them? I mean, go to any black neighborhood in any major city and I think it's pretty easy to see the results.
>>677632403
Let women and men fuck around without judging them. As long as protection is used, no prob at all.
Only redarded catholics and muslims give a fuck.
>>677635353
How does her already having fucked other guys make her vagina or sex with her worse?
Assuming she has good genital hygiene and done an STD test recently, what's bad her having a wild sexual history?
Aren't you just insecure, that your own past is not wild enough so you are not experienced enough to be on her level?
>>677634100
>Stop liking things I don't like.
>>677632403
Being a stud is hard, being a slut is easy.
Simple as that.
I have the right to decide who I sleep with based on whatever criteria I decide, a person's promiscuity included. My dick doesn't have to justify shit.
>>677632727
So we can agree that getting dick as a girl is no achievment, right?
However, that does not mean that a girl having lots of partners have worse morals than a dude with lots of partners.
>>677632403
i think the problem with a chick that sleeps with too many guys is the fact that you know if you guys have trouble and take some time apart, she'll be able to bang a guy every hour if she wants.
if she doesn't sleep with guys right away, then you have some time to either work things out, or find a different girl to fuck before she finds a guy... makes things easier
i've always liked to get them unexperienced, then turn them in to ass licking cum chuggers, so that when they do find another guy, he always knows i took every part of her first.
>>677632403
If you have a key which can open any lock, its a good key right?
But if you have a lock which can be opened by any key, its a bad lock right?
Imagine that boys are the keys, and women are the locks, faggot.
Its way easier to get laid for a girl, than it is for a boy. Girls just haveto show their tits and ask for sex. When a boy ehips out his dick and asks for sex, he'll get locked up.
Recently acquired a girlfriend, she's been open about her sexual history.
She has had 47 partners before me, I've had 3 before her.
We are happy together and she says she loves sex with me more than anyone else.
She is very attractive and has had a lot of interesting sexual experience. She is also bisexual.
Any thoughts or opinions on this?
>>677636361
Dumbass, sex with many partners stretches out the vagina and makes it feel like throwing a hotdog down a canyon.
pic most definitely related
>>677632403
John lost all my respect years ago, I have no reason to care about anything he says, it would be the same as complaining about a cow that moos. He's just a pompous, pretentious windbag hipster that writes shitty books
as far as the topic, for those that are concerned, it does matter, man or woman, how many people they slept with, as >>677636095, and >>677636189 have pointed out.
>>677636785
You should get a vasectomy to prevent spreading your defective omega genes to future generations
>>677636811
can we get an un edited picture of this?2
>>677636785
Dump her asap before she hurts you, and hurt you hard she will
>>677636811
You're retarded if you believe that, for 2 reasons:
1. A girl who had only 1 partner before might have been in a long term relationship with tons of sex, while someone with tons of partners might just have had sex a few times with each of them. So the girl with less partners might have had more sex in total.
2. More sex doesn't stretch shit. It may even make the vagina tighter due to training the muscles.
>>677636785
>We are happy together and she says she loves sex with me more than anyone else.
>Any thoughts or opinions on this?
She's lying.
>>677637248
she definitely is
>>677636213
actually, young people in the 70's were having more fun than people today
>>677634474
>applying critical thinking on /b/
>>677637248
47 partners in experience tells her that you tell each man that same thing.
>>677637017
Thats not photoshopped
>ive seen pixels in my day
>>677635809
So you're telling me if you happened to have slept with 4 people by June then you are going to go frigid for the next few months so you don't go over your quota? Fuck sake, that's sad man.
If you like (or maybe even WANT) sex and you happen to be single then what's the big deal with sleeping with someone?
>oh but I only have sex with people I care and love
Okfag.jpg
>>677636785
i promise you that she doesn't find sex more enjoyable with you.
also, i've had sex with 13 girls, and a few guys, if i was adding up fooling around i couldn't tell you the number, but it isn't larg... and even i have to think if the number is 12 or 13 or 14, if she is saying 47, then she really has no idea how many she's banged, not unless she is actively keeping score, which makes her a little fucked up
>>677636785
>She has had 47 partners
.
Honestly, who keeps track like this? I mean, I've fucked a lot of girls, but probably less than 47. Fact is, I don't really know the number because I'm not on some mission to fuck a certain number of girls.
Does she have a notebook somewhere with names and notes of past performances? Maybe star ratings? If not, she should start one. She wouldn't want to lose count after keeping track up to 47.
>>677632403
>playing a character to get laid
>manipulating stupid women
>its okay to be a whore
>i wont judge you
imokaywiththis.jpg
>>677636785
doesn't sound to bad, use it to your advantage.
she's bi and obviously loves sex, so it's pretty likely she would like threesomes.
>>677632403
>>677632403
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpQqH4H_SUQ
>>677633839
Ad hominem, a used woman is a turn off for a lot of different reasons for a lot of different people. I doubt every person who does´nt want a slut for a romantic partner wants her to be a pure religious girl.
>>677637225
>So the girl with less partners might have had more sex in total
But the vagina stretches more based on the number of partners due to having to constantly adapt to new shapes and sizes of cock. Eventually it can no longer adapt and stretches out.
>>677632403
"48 dirty niggers had their hands in my box looking for a prize. Eat up before it gets soggy" - Cerrios
>>677637462
A child does that.
You count sexual conquests up to a certain age.
If she has the number either she has fucked 47 people without growing very old or the fuck up.
>>677636254
Two scenarios:
>1 woman & 100 men can have 1 kid every 9 months
100 women & 1 man can have 100 kids every nine months
The "stud" scenario wins every time
>>677632403
the more people a girl has fucked, and the more promiscuous she is, the easier it is for her to cheat in a relationship.
all my ex's that had been with tons of guys, ended up getting caught cheating, they took no issue with entertaining guys that started hitting on them, instead of telling them to back off.
the girl I am with now has only had one guy in her past, and she does not even entertain the idea of another guy hitting on her. her exact reasoning for this is literally "I'm not going to put myself in a position that could set me up for a lapse in judgement."
my cheating ex's would drink and get wasted at parties, one claimed she was "raped" later down the road when she fucked a guy and then they had a falling out. but she did not claim rape THEN, only later.
my current girlfriend won't get drunk at parties because shes afraid of losing her inhibitions and doing something she would regret, she also won't go to parties without me.
>>677637772
What scientific journal did you get that from? Your mom's?
>>677632403
I personally am quite disturbed, no matter what my partners gender.
I have massive anxiety issues and i can't really understand fucking someone for the sake of fucking them, promiscuous sex just doesn't make sense to me. I feel like the connection is a lot more important. But obviously my partners have had this connection with other people in the past and i cannot physically believe that they would rather it with me over their past lovers.
No matter what, they will be comparing us to their past lovers, people they feel that they literally couldn't survive without before us.
There is an omnipresent threat that they will never be satisfied with you, that they always liked their ex's more, which possibly leads to beyond physically but also emotionally.
>>677637685
>ad hominem
Is that what you call every argument you just kinda don't like? I didn't even call you any name. I was just pointing out how there's little difference between the silly lock comparison and that about the candy.
>>677636727
This isn't necessarily true. The biggest whore I ever knew is settled down with a guy who went to Afghanistan and never cheated on him. I think she just grew up or maybe the guy has a freakishly huge cock and she doesn't want to screw up the deep dicking she gets each night.
>>677635666
Yeah. So says the devil...
>>677637828
I guess that's why inner city blacks are so prosperous.
>>677633923
/internet
>>677632403
A key that opens many locks is valuable, and is called a master key. A lock that is open by many keys is just useless.
>>677636095
>it's obvious your love is cheap and easily given as well as easily taken away
Exactly this
>>677637772
that's bullshit you're pulling out of your ass and you know it, insecure faggot
Do you think a vagina is some kind of fucking play dough that adapts the shape of your cock?
How different do you think penises are, the variance isn't even big enough for an effect like this.
Yeah there are differences, but they are not big enough to cause a vagina to change because she got to many different penises.
>>677638091
that happens i'm sure, i mean the problem with settling down with one in the first place, it is always on your mind how easily she could bang another dude if she wanted
>>677638348
Very profound. Never heard that before...
>>677637878
Sounds like your probably young and dated a lot of immature girls
I'm not saying mature women can't cheat. I'm saying that not all girls with a high dick count are cheaters.
I'm glad you found yourself a loyal gal. But the fact that she's had one previous partner has very little to do with it.
>>677638158
Oh I get what this thread is about...
>women aren't allowed to have multiple partners
>mentioning the devil
Guys we have some christfags on /b/
Just go back to church and praise the Lord please
>>677635353
The truest.
>>677632712
I hope you know that that's a really stupid analogy.
>>677638450
It's not just vaginas that the principle applies to. Keep that in mind the next time you let a strange man slide his manhood up your poophole.
Loose pussies suck, not literally though. If you enjoy tossing your hotdogs down a hallway more power to you.
ITT: feminazis & manchildren feed the trolls
tldr: copypasta
>>677633278
Genetics doesn't work like that you UNEDUCATED FUCK
>>677632712
It wouldn't be a lousy lock. It would be a master lock that could be opened with any key.
>>677632403
this comparison would be accurate if it was from the other perspective. would you want to eat from a bowl of cheerios that 47 other people have already taken a bite from? no? i didn't think so either.
>why not?
cause it's fucking gross. you don't know what shit other people leave behind. and i don't want other people's shit. i want delicious cheerios that no one else has stuck their dicks in.
>would you buy a car that had 26 previous owners and 231,045 miles?
>>677638544
>677635666
>67763666
>6776666
>67666
>6666
>666
>>677636785
Aside from the fact that she's lying to you? Yeah she's only saying that because she wouldn't want you to feel inferior. I had a girlfriend like this and she turned out to be incredibly insecure. When I cut things off she threatened to kill herself among other things such as stealing my stuff.
>>677638616
Yes, the vagina can get stretched out. But after some time it goes back to its normal size.
Also, pelvic floor muscles you fucking Fedora.
>>677638757
If it was a Ferrari, yes. Yes I would.
And no fucks would be given.
>>677632403
I wouldn't really want to eat cheerios that have been eaten 48 times before though
>>677632403
It's easy for women to fuck many men. It's hard for men to fuck many women.
>>677638895
>getting this angry while being trolled
>>677632403
XOR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_d4l8OuI-U
>>677638918 Are you retarded? @_@
It has nothing to do with what they said, it's a joke about the last three numbers of the post. I am not even that person but it's just so blatantly obvious that somehow you're oblivious of that fact that I stepped in to help you out.
>>677632725
Do you realize how many teenage girls would bang this guy?
>>677638978
That's only true if you have standards
Everyone who have slept with more than like 50 people is discstuing. If you only hold those standards for women it is because you are protecting your ego.
>>677632712
A pencil sharpener would be terrible if it could only sharpen one pencil. They can sharpen hundreds and still work just as good.
But sharpen a pencil a hundred times and it's worthless and unusable.
A key that opens a bunch of locks is a master key.
A lock that gets open by a bunch of keys is a shitty lock.
>>677636785
Hope you're a cuck, if not you will be
>>677639201
>Everyone who have slept with more than like 50 people is discstuing.
And virgins can't spell. What's your point?
>>677639173
Seems like someone is a bit mad here. You need to get your hole sir
>>677639190
even most fat whales believe that they are something better and only deserve a fashion model with a sixpack brah.
>>677638047
>be internet age
>people see big words like ad hominem and make a wild guess as to what it means
>people try to use it in that context
>all while Google is right the fuck there
bunch ah lazy faggots I tell ya.
>>677639023
>implying I'm angry
Keep wishing
>>677639240
No, honey.
There's nothing special about a sharpener doing 1,000 pencils.
Now one pencil you know to have lasted through being sharpened a 1,000 times is an astounding pencil. You'll tell people about that pencil.
>>677638047
I agree ad hominem was a misuse, I meant to rewrite it as faulty comparison before I posted it but forgot. But I don´t agree with equating a man who does not want to be with a woman who has had X ammount of sexual partners to a muslim. Islam is oppressive and forces women into not publicly having unmarried sex, anons just want a good pure girl who they can love and not have to worry about her past life. Though the lock shit is pretty fucking stupid.
>>677637824
>>677637462
>>677637371
>>677637201
I was happy before I met her so even if she does leave it won't be the end of the world for me.
And I didn't say I believed her, although masturbating since I was 6 has helped me last a long time and I'm pretty good looking myself with a bigger than average but not stupidly big penis so I don't see why I couldn't be a good fuck.
And she is not very old, she's 20.
But thanks for the feedback.
>>677632403
The women he's talking about have probably gotten more pussy than him.
>>677639240
That analogy doesn't work because guys don't have a set number of fucks before their dick runs out or whatever. The lock analogy actually makes sense.
>>677633923
>this guy
t's fucking retarded how easily people find the most normal things ''legendary'' all of a sudden. Most of the times they just reply like this to someone who shares their opinion. Pics like this are just mental masturbation.
I was on a tinder date a couple months ago, and number of sex partners came up. I told her I had slept with 11 girls (I'm 25) and she got really pissed. If I had told her my real number, which was around 90 back then, her mind would have exploded.
>>677638544
Is it saying that women are´nt allowed to have multiple sexual partners or that men don´t want a girl who has had many sexual partners compared to a girl who has not?
>>677639621
>And she is not very old, she's 20
I'm not normally one to get too bent about a woman's sexual history, but everyone has their limits. Holy shit.
Back of the envelope math tells me that if she started having sex at 15, she's fcuked a different guy every 5 weeks (on average) before you.
>>677638931
enjoy your 40 year old ferrari that's worn out and shitty that no one else wants.
>>677632403
Biology is the reason this attitude exists. A man can sire children with numerous women, so having multiple partners is a sign of virility. A woman can only get pregnant by one man at a time. Humans have no biological drive towards female promiscuity. That's why this attitude exists.
>>677639867
Don't stop him now, he's rolling
>people are cheerios
good job dipshit
>>677632403
More partners => STD's and STI's
More cheerios =/= more disease
>>677632962
John Green is married, son.
>>677632403
I've never caught an STD from a box of cereal.
>>677640049
then it's clearly outdated and useless now because pregnancy is not a direct result of casual sex anymore.
you can fuck all you want and never have a kid, so no reason not to
Did somebody say they wanted to fuck?
>>677640011
She started at 14 and has had sex weekly since she started. She has had two long term relationships that lasted 2 years plus.
>>677632712
Sup virgin you realize that women aren't locks right and that, sjw bullshit aside, they aren't actually objects?
>>677639867
>>677639585
A mouth that was already cleaned by 100 tooth brushes is probably clean.
A toothbrush that was already in 100 mouths is probably dirty as fuck.
>>677640319
That's not the point dumbass. The point is that the reaction is visceral and not a reflection of social norms. There has likely never been one major civilization that has felt any other way. Ultimately we are animals are beholden to our instincts.
the majority of the arguments against this seem to stem from people who are afraid of losing the sanctity of a sexually exclusive relationship. personally i think two people can love each other and fuck other people whenever they feel like it. anyone thats made love, knows sex with people you dont care about is no big deal, it adds to the fun though because your girlfriend might not be into the same kinks as you are, you might want a girl that can deepthroat or is comfortable with anal, or just because human beings need variety in sexual partners and friends. the argument about the whole traditional or evolutionary scenario is also rather false, as during the paleolithic era tribes would have orgies all the time, and most people would never know who the father is of a child as every woman would probably have slept with every guy in the tribe. its said ill never live in the world that has actually sexually liberated itself
>>677640319
yet women's attitude hasn't changed a bit. Tough shit.
>>677640556
maybe you're an animal, but most educated people are able to change their mind
>>677640535
what if the toothbrush is not clean before it goes into the mouth?
>>677640653
speak for your own sexual/social deficiencies, but don't think that because you can't get laid a lot, that means it is impossible
>>677640535
Replace "toothbrushes" with "dicks" and that mouth is probably dirty as fuck.
>>677637225
Yea cuz that crack ho that's taken 10 million dicks is just so tight huh. Fucking idiot
>>677640732
>what if the toothbrush is not clean before it goes into the mouth?
what if the key is broken, because one lock didn't go open?
>>677632403
a key that can open any lock is a magic key
a Lock that can be opened by any key is trash
>>677640876
replace the locks with vaginas and the key is dirty as fuck too.
>>677640972
I can't tell if you're trolling or if you actually think you're being clever
>>677640758
that has to do with what you said what exactly? Oh yeah, nothing, just throwing some ad hominems around because your argument is shit.
>>677641099
a man who has had sex with many partners can have stds just like a woman who has had many partners
You're just pointing out flaws in my analogy that the key/lock analogy also suffers from.
>>677640670
Tell that to your fight or flight instinct.
>>677640523
If an attractive male said "WHO WANTS TO HAVE SEX" in a bar when it closes, they *might* get a "sure!" from some drunk slut.
If a mildly attractive woman says that same phrase at close, there would be a single-file line to her vagina.
That's why it is a good analogy.
>>677639984
Fuck! Really? Thanks man, I would've never figured that out
>>677640670
Learn to biology. You can claim something on the surface, but you can't fight instinct.
>>677640784
>this x1000
>>677636785
>Girl: 47 Partners
>You: 3 Partners
Bruh
>it's harder for men to have many partners, therefore women who have many partners are bad
>it's harder for woman to be good at sports, therefore man who play sports are bad
>Giving a shit about this.
If you're in for fucking some pussy, why would you even care where it's been. Just have sex and move on, dude.
>>677632403
Can't tell if he's a cuckhold, or if he passively wants to be pozzed by proxy. Either way I understand why so many hipsters love this moron.
>>677641268
It's a bad analogy because you're comparing people to objects to justify your shitty perception of sexuality in society.
My GF told me she had a foursome with 3 guys when she was 16.
It took me some time to process that but was like w/e soon after. Now I think of it again. It's a weird thought to have/know.
>>677641653
Imagine the migraine a tumblrina would get if you told xir that John Greene "objectifies women".
>>677639885
Guy you replied to here.
It seems every retarded soliloquy like in the OP needs to blow immensely out of proportion for it to be "good". You can no longer just agree normally to a statement. Internet, and to a certain degree social interaction in general, have morphed into this ugly fucking thing where the lingo consists of unnecessary hyperbole and retarded analogies (again, like in the OP) for it to be at all relevant.
Everything needs to be "relatable" like a Jerry Seinfeld standup. The statements and maymays spawning from this cesspool are so vague and generalized that most human beings can relate to them, creating this artificial little hugbox where everyone's in the same boat.
Fuck, if Internet died tomorrow I'd be glad. I'd go out and communicate with an actual human being without resorting to retarded crying emojis or low-quality screenshots of ordinary shit.
>>677641096
Body wash, my friend. Anyway, the whole analogy with the locks is about not being open to just anyone. Men are usually willing to fuck just about anyone; when a woman doesn't just open up to anyone, that shows she has respect for herself.
>>677636785
Isn't that a quote from Clerks?
>>677641599
I'll take false equivalency for 500 Alex
>>677641739
>Cheerios knows you'll never love it like it loves you
Yes. Cheerios isn't special because it's the 48th cereal you've eaten.
It's just another cereal. A cereal thats only goal in life at the moment of meeting you was to be your favorite cereal, but it knows all those other 48 cereals were your favorite when they were in your bowl, so cheerios knows you'll never love it like it loves you.
>>677641739
Dude, imagine walking into a girls room and seeing that. Like...I don't even know how I'd react. Especially if you saw yours there.
>>677634943
I LOVE JOHN GREEN
>>677641874
women can use body wash too.
So a woman who's open to anyone has no self respect, but men who are open to anyone do?
>>677641923
Incorrect
>>677638694
Bosnianbill detected
>>677641739
"Why can't I find a meaningful relationship with a surrogate father figure?"
>>677632403
vaginas get all saggy and gross when theyre used too much. dicks stay the same.
>>677636785
Acquired - buy or obtain (an asset or object) for oneself.
"I managed to acquire all the books I needed"
You're a piece of shit.
>>677641915
In a row!?
>>677641653
You're right
Because cheerios aren't an object or anything
Cuck feminist sympathizer
>>677632403
The fuck? Since when are women equal to damn cheerios? As if every woman was the same. Some women has better breasts, some are better at blow job and some at fucking. This guy is retarded.
>>677632712
Also this is stupid.
>>677642064
Correct
>>677640319
I don't think you get it dude, we're talking about objective reality on this planet, not your immature perceptions of your social mores.
>>677637801
Kek
>>677632712
Since when is /b a bunch of fucking white faggot knights. This guy had it spot on
>>677632712
I love how idiots throw this platitude around like just because there is an analogy they can use it must be true
>>677632403
john green likes aids
>>677632725
How many friend zones are you in?
>>677638869
I am having a crazy girlfriend and I am thinking of breaking up with her. now I am fearing she might do the same suicide answer after this.
what should I do?
>>677632403
I'm a female virgin and if a guy told me that he liked the fact that I hadn't slept with any other guys it would be a red flag. It's not a positive or negative thing, and I wouldn't want to have sex with someone hoping to have sex with me just because I am a virgin.
How do you guys even know these girls are "sluts"? Rumours don't count, as people lie to ruin the reputation of others.
How many partners constitutes a slut (if you say five or less I'm going to assume you're trolling)?
Why do you "deserve" a girl that hasn't had sex when you've had sex before (by your own standards you're impure)?
>>677642200
O wow you said cuck, argument over.
Technically he didn't objectify women tho. He anthropomorphized cheerios. It's different and therefore YOU'RE WRONG! It's okay buddy better luck next time virgin
>>677642054
Obviously women can use bodywash too, my point was that the "dirtiness" is irrelevant. And yes, men get props for fucking girls, and girls get props for not being so easy.
If a dude is a virgin, he gets made fun of & put down but if a girl's a virgin, she gets praised. It works both ways.
>>677642505
Sit back,relax and enjoy? Shes not going to do anything .
>>677635789
i'll take the latter
>>677632712
Such a fucking underrated comment. Idiots all around.
>>677638694 Especially this fag.
>>677636785
>she says she loves sex with me more than anyone else
What, you think woman will suddenly stop lying to you? Of course she fucking said you're the best, it's a lie to make you feel good.
>>677632712
/thread
>>677642612
And more to your point on this, the main argument in this discussion always seems to come down to 'men can enjoy sex as much as they want, but women can't'. Why?
>>677642612
>>677642612
That isn't what people are saying sweetie. I never fucked around either, so I have had a handful of parteners. I'm not gonna wife someone who can't say the same. Only biblehumpers actually want virgins.
>>677637772
HAHAHAHAH wtf?! Are you 12 or something?
Anywho I dated a girl for 2 years who had about 26 guys before me. Her pussy was without a doubt "small".
On the other side I took the virginity of a girl and her pussy was "big".
Fuck off with these retarded ideas. Sure if a girl did porn for years maybe it would do a difference but not with the regular girls out there.
>>677632403
>Men 2016: It's okay if my child will have multiple fathers.
>>677642713
15 year old detected mods pls ban
>>677642633
So that makes what he said right?
>>677642658
she already tried in the past, before we met. I done fucked up by getting into a long relationship with her, but what's done is done.
I won't be blackmailed into a relationship, but I also don't want her to end her life, as I still love her.
>>677642612
I've had sex with several virgins and its nothing special. If anything it's shitty and awkward the first couple of times.
>>677642891
You don't know how childbirth works, do ya bud?
>>677632403
No emotional attachment to cheerios
>idontwanttoliveonthisplanetanymore
>>677642713
But for fucks sake even though its a simple image, you cant compare a penis to a key and a vagina to a lock
>>677640037
I would. Hell yes.
>>677643007
I don't think you understood what he was saying, bud.
>>677632403
I don't have much to say about his cucktarded quote but I nailed his PA once.
>>677640784
This. Thank you.
>>677643104
He's saying he's 12 and hasn't gone through sex ed yet.
If he's trying to say anything else he did so in a fucking retarded way that doesn't make biological sense
>>677641275
Ok, firstly, RUDE.
Secondly, MEAN.
>>677632403
If you agree that women are objects for your wanton pleasure, then he's right.
If you think they're humans and you want anything that resembles a relationship, including a physical one, you're SOL.
>>677643074
Right because you don't have to court the locks owner for the key to suddenly work. The lock doesn't usually have a mouth that will drag you down and it sure as hell doesn't have stupid opinions that only stupid woman have.
>>677639867
No it doesn't, because the analogy is completely unrelated to sex besides that a key goes in a hole.
>>677642928
>I won't be blackmailed into a relationship, but I also don't want her to end her life, as I still love her.
Sounds like you should tell her exactly that.
>>677642612
>How many partners constitutes a slut (if you say five or less I'm going to assume you're trolling)?
Don't set the lower limit to an arbitrary number. Virgin or not, that is not good judgement.
It takes only two partners. One to be in a relationship, and another to cheat with. That and flinging relationship. If you're going to fuck without serious prospects of marrying the person you're with you are by definition a slut and the embodiment of degeneracy. I would not want to marry a slut, and no self respecting guy would.
>>677632403
Reminds me of vehicles. Every time it puts on miles or gets a new owner it looses value. Like what's more appealing, 40,000kms only one owner, or 620,000kms 40 owners drove hard and smoked in.... Works same way with vagina. If it's your first car you're not fussy but after that you get particular.
>pic related
>>677643231
He obviously isn't referring to a biological father.
None so blind as those that won't see.
Children NEED both a mother and a father.
trust me, I've met plenty of fatherless women.
Some fucked up shit.
>>677643400
Most guys falls into that same degenerate category and the ones who are 'staying pure' aren't doing it by choice.
>>677632403
>eating the same cereal 48 others already have spitten out
pretty retarded tbh
>>677643574
You clearly didn't understand cause he said multiple fathers not zero
>>677643610
>I cannot conceive how any self-respecting man can possibly not submit themselves to degeneracy
you might as well just kill yourself right now
>>677643648
Woman run mind games with themselves so that they can believe their own outrageous lies and not feel any guilt.
>>677639867
Locks don't wear out.
Vaginas don't have particular shapes that only match certain dicks, and "wrong" dicks rough it out until it works for any dick.
Hell, the vaginal walls are muscles. The more fucking that goes on, the stronger they're likely to be.
If you want a bitch who is tight, you want a bitch who does kegels. End of fucking story.
>>677643352
>completely unrelated to sex besides that a key goes in a hole.
That's just wrong.
In modern society, it's a man's job to "open" a woman's legs.
It's her job to resist 99.9% of all men, because they all believe they're worthy of the top 0.1% of men.
>>677634137
This is bad because?
>>677636785
I've had sex with over 100 women in a 5 year period. I have cheated on every single girl I've dated. I'm a lying fucking degenerate who's broken many a heart. I wish to stop but I continue to fuck fuck fuck and I don't care anymore.
From experience, I don't think she's loyal or will be if you get into a fight and she's having girls night out more often than not.
>AMA
>>677632403
Who the fuck cares and that guy is obviously a cucked piece of shit. He's a loser for creating the image and you're a loser for sharing it.
![Coke-Can[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/bN5TWW2.jpg "Coke-Can[1].jpg")
>>677632403
Would you prefer to drink a delicious, freshly-opened coke can, or one that has had 7 dicks in it?
>>677643733
>You clearly didn't understand cause he said multiple fathers not zero
You're still refusing to understand.
It's pretty clear what he meant.
>>677642644
Now you're just saying that it's a social norm because it's a social norm.
Not very meaningful.
>>677643570
Bingo!
>>677635353
The fact that some of y'all truly believe this brings a tear to my eye
Thank you boys for leaving the girls that actually enjoy sex to those that aren't completely autistic when it comes to catering their needs.
>>677643400
A slut isn't someone who's cheated, it's someone that is sexually promiscuous by definition, pic related.
How many men would a woman have to sleep with to labeled a slut? Is the number the same for men? Why?
>>677643816
>>I cannot conceive the notion that people might have sex to have fun and have done so as long as the human race has existed and instead I'm going to hold up this high standard to women and die alone because I'm a 4/10 at best.
Follow your own advice edgelord.
>>677632403
I agree that how many people someone has had sex with isn't really a moral issue, but it's perfectly valid to have a personal preference to fuck/date women (or men) who aren't promiscuous. Your preferences don't need to be rationally justified, it's just how you feel.
Also it's a shit analogy because all cheerios are the same, it feels good to have a woman choose you and not other men because it means they think you're better in some way.
>>677643858
Remember the episode of southpark with the fishdick joke. Same idea
>>677641837
Goddamn you've said something I've struggled to put into words for a while now.
>>677644140
>>doesn't explain just keeps stating it's obvious what he meant.
I get that you don't understand, just stop trying
>>677632403
This john green deserves a good fucking slap. No one should be sleeping with hundreds of people. It's bad that anyone does it.
Also it's easier for women to have sex, a lot of women expect you to prove yourself to them first... men don't give a shit about that bollocks.
It's like me going to a bearded lady show and expecting praise because i can grow a beard too. You're all fucking idiots.
>>677632403
Well a cunt loses it's tightness with every dick that's bust a nut into her.
So it's a fact that a women is losing worth with every dick she puts inside her.
Women are objects. Objects lose value the more they are used.
>>677644528
Objectively incorrect, try again virgin
>>677632403
>sex is cheerios
Maybe not everyone sees sex as completely disposable and unimportant. I don't really care how many guys a girls has slept with but it's usually more telling about her personality and the context of the number is important too.
John Green is a big faggot
>>677644252
>A slut isn't someone who's cheated, it's someone that is sexually promiscuous by definition, pic related.
All people who cheat are sexually promiscious
>How many men would a woman have to sleep with to labeled a slut? Is the number the same for men? Why?
I already answered that. See >>677643400
>>677644329
Plus when they talk about their sex life/past relationships, you can't help but think about all the dicks.
>>677641837
>>677644529
The dying alone train is leaving soon, you better hop on faggot
>>677643955
Nice dubs but that's circular. That's the attitude the analogy tries (and fails) to justify. You basically just said "it should be that way because it is."
>>677635353
>And when she "closes her eyes so she can finally orgasm"? She's not doing it because pleasure, she's imagining her past boyfriend still fucking her.
>literally so cucked this is what he actually thinks
>>677644712
Ok but don't lump in cheaters with people who are promiscuous.
All x may be y here, but not all y are x
Imagine trying to care for a women who hundreds of men couldn't and got out of there as soon as they came.
>>677644741
>NEEDS MORE JPEG
Is it irony that that picture is a PNG?
>>677644478
It's nothing like that.
>>677637017
Lazy fuck.
>>677644662
>Objectively incorrect, try again virgin
BZZZZTT
I've fucked two women. Not only you don't know biology you're shit at guessing over the internet with people you argue
>>677644662
nice try, white knight.
Hows your male hymen?
>>677644967
Of course they're fucking promiscuous, else they wouldn't have gone out of their way to fuck someone you flaming retarded faggot.
>>677635232
Spot on
>>677632403
If you stop slut shaming girls, more girls will sleep around, therefore, it will be easier for you to lose your virginity, except OP because he is a faggot.
>>677644712
If I was satisfied with your answer I wouldn't have asked again.
So if someone cheats once (one kiss), they're sexually promiscuous? I'm looking to solidify an actual answer here, or do you believe that after two partners someone's a slut? Or is that only in the case of cheating? Because it just seemed like you were trying to dodge the question.
>>677644737
Yup I feel you dude. It can really get me bent out of shape when I'm with a girl I really like and I think about shit like that.
On the other hand it's not like I think anyone's a bad person for having sex a lot, most of my friends in high school were slutty girls haha
>>677645092
I feel bad for them.
Vagina is a muscle, use strengthens it. Besides you'll never have to worry about stretching out women with that two incher pincher you're undoubtedly rocking
>>677645238
Stop trying to push your agenda
>>677644129
Did you know there are people who put salted peanuts in their Coke before they drink it, consuming the salted peanuts as they drink it and replenishing the peanuts as they are consumed? I tried it, not bad at all.
>>677645320
That's not how a vagina works faggot.
>ITT: we make up random analogies and pretend they apply to reality
Would you rather eat a lollipop that's been in 50 anuses or one that has only been in 1 anus?
>>677645166
>>says correct statement
U-uh fuck.. DURR WHITE KNIGHT! Yeah I showed him.
>>677637248
this man speaks the truth
>>677645172
Oh no. I thought I was having a rational discussion but now I see you're actually retarded
>>677644967
>Ok but don't lump in cheaters with people who are promiscuous.
Promiscuous women are, by definition, sluts
Sorry the definition doesn't fit your narrative, but it's the truth. Stop trying to warp meaning.
>>677632403
Well having multiple partners is one thing, but if his example is 48 that seems like a lot to me but I might just be too young and inexperienced
It's hard for children and the immature to understand that some of us live to a higher standard of excellence. Don't pander to the lowest common denominators. Control is a hallmark of maturity and excellence. Controlling ones-self and ones environment are the cornerstones of what sets us apart from other animals.
Some people are rocked in a race to the bottom. Let them crash. If they're too dim to understand the importance of discernment and good judgement, then their lot is like the dogs and rats. They breed all they can for the sake of it. That's not the evolutionary path that humans took to reach civilization. That's a step backwards.
We got here through control and selective breeding of the best genes, not by literally fucking like rats. That shit's for the chronic underclass whose only viable destiny is to be controlled by someone better suited than them. Don't be enamored by their irrational impulse driven immaturity.
>>677645425
It actually is, child.
>>677645320
Vagina's will naturally get more loose as they age, and they will loosen up after having children as well. A vagina wouldn't be a very good exit if it got tighter and tighter.
>>677645536
I simply said DON'T lump them in unnecessarily with cheaters. How fucking daft are you.
>>677645019
Oh really. So a man walks up to a women and asks for sex 9/10 times she'll turn him down, she doesn't even know his name.
A woman asks a man the same thing 9/10 times the man will agree.
Believe what you want, doesn't change how the social system works.
Women that have slept with a lot of different partners are statistically more likely to cheat on you. Sorry but it's fact.
>>677645659
But multiple cocks spread out over the years ain't gonna do shit.
ITT: people arguing over pointless nonsense
All of you need to reconsider your life choices
>>677645587
Saying child does not make you more mature. If anything it just shows that you are willing to use that word to make your opponents seem weaker because you have no argument based on fact. So sad.
