Creepshot thread
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Creepshot thread
>>677002611
>>677003027
I have never seen such difference in quality back-to-back like that in a creep thread. It's as if you were intentionally trying to take the thread from awesome to shit in record time
>>677003027
>>677003499
I enjoyed the picture a lot more than your comment
>>677002611
>>677003499
This is already a get thread
>>677004552
>enjoying pictures of blurry asses
okay friend. You were probably one of those kids who jerked it to scrambled porn.
>>677004821
fucking nice. you take this?
said I was texting
>>677005823
I wish you were. That fucking tampon string. Come on man, get your shit together
>>677004829
Why are her legs the same color as the Corndogs on the poster?
>>677006229
Found the virgin.
>>677006492
Perfect ass
>>677006229
>>677005071
No but I'd rather jerk off to scrambled porn than jerk off to people complaining about scrambled porn
>>677008340
Bloody. Kek
>>677004821
what the fuck nigga...dem beeyotches be all nekkid and shit and you only took that one wack ass pic? sheeeeit post da rest daaaamn!
>>677005823
Is that her tampon ?
Can anyone brighten this up
>>677002611
You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit" due to the nature of the nude photographs being stolen and originating from celebrities. In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these nude photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances. If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
Source: Ph.D in clinical psychology.
How does someone learn the art of creepshotting? Like how to put your phones in public places, etc.
webms please
>>677011246
lol didnt read
im pretty sure youre a faggot though
>>677011246
>>677011246
I'll rape ur mum
>>677005185
>>677009310
I didn't take this. It's from another one of these threads.
>>677011246
>>677011246
Just fap faggot.
First and only creepshot
Any good?
>>677011246
good read
>Ph.D in clinical psychology
>>677011246
Yes, because rape and posting random pics without consent are the same thing. Are you literally fucking retarded? I guess autists that go to cons and take pics without consent are all rapists too, huh? Or maybe when my grandma took a pic of me at christmas without my consent, she was a rapist all along, and I didn't even know it. I get what you're trying to say, I do. But, the main difference is:
Rape is a type of sexual assault usually involving sexual intercourse or other forms of sexual penetration perpetrated against a person without that person's consent.
You see, when you come up with your own definition for a word, it lessens the value of it after enough use. In a way, you raped me of my knowledge.
Source: Ph. D in Common Fucking Sense
>>677011246
I'm sorry, all I read was "I'm jealous I'm not hot enough to get creeped on" jealous cunt. Lose some weight.
Let/s put the link to this thread in a femminazzi website right now
Idk, tumblr whatever their sites are
>>677014088
>>677013808
newfag
>>677011246
If this wasnt copypasta before, it is now
>>677014208
>>677011246
>>677014290
>>677014373
>>677014373
>>677014290
lolwhat
>>677014431
>>677011246
>>677011246
>>677014646
nigga is that your mom lmao
>>677011246
You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit" due to the nature of the nude photographs being stolen and originating from celebrities. In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these nude photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances. If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
Source: Ph.D in clinical psychology.
>>677013692
Ya did good anon, ya did good.
>>677014211
Enjoying a quality post doesn't make me a newfag
>>677014796
Kill yourself faggot.
>>677014866
You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit" due to the nature of the nude photographs being stolen and originating from celebrities. In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these nude photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances. If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
Source: Ph.D in clinical psychology.
>>677014796
0/10 apply yourself
>>677014796
tl;dr
>>677005823
>>677008340
I'd hit that
>>677005823
Is that a tampon string dude?
>>677014796
gr8 b8 m8
>>677014993
>>677015020
You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit" due to the nature of the nude photographs being stolen and originating from celebrities. In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these nude photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances. If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
Source: Ph.D in clinical psychology.
>>677015106
>>677013692
beuno bein
Take it to your debate club homos. I just wanna see some yogi pants.
>>677014944
idk how you mistype 4chan instead of tumblr in your URL bar but you did it bud
>>677014646
well?
>>677014796
>You're all literally rapists
>>677015122
>>677015331
You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit" due to the nature of the nude photographs being stolen and originating from celebrities. In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these nude photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances. If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
Source: Ph.D in clinical psychology.
>>677014781
Mother in law
>>677015138
It's invasion of privacy you dipshit. If your going to rant and get pissed, know what the fuck you're talking about at least a bit.
>>677015439
yes she's in college
>>677015507
>>677015507
>>677015544
keep sharing?? you got a webm?
>>677011742
I'm pretty sure youre a rapist with a dog's iq faggot
>>677011833
I wonder how you would feel being the bait... I'm sure if you went to jail and bent over...well then you'd probably understand the deal with consent. Either way I hope you get raped :D
>>677014047
oh my god the weed smoking white knight is here
learn when to ignore bait you gigantic newfag
>>677015507
>>677016387
>>677011246
Kek
>>677012045
I'll rape you, with a wooden, splintered spike. Right in your asshole :D How does it sound now bitch?
>>677014047
kill yourself plox
>>677016510
>>677016510
Daaaayyyyyummmmm.
>>677016510
This is one of my favorites. The way it giggles hnnnng
>>677016621
>>677011246
Yet its not illegal
>>677012746
let me really quickly explain- this has no consent and so it's morally wrong. I know you're probably a fucking idiot who doesn't know how to read but did that help? Faggot
I've got tons of OC
>>677016699
>>677014047
Ya because if you told just anyone, including your Mom and Dad, that you were taking creepshots of women you think they would receive that well? Lollllll you're a literal fucking imbecile. Do you feel proud of yourself? Jacking off into a hand towel and wondering why it never works out with women? I'm sure you are doing great in your basement
>>677014796
>Whiteknight detected
>>677016751
So is it morally wrong to look at an attractive woman who's walking past me? Or do I have to get her consent first? Moron.
>>677016751
But it's not illegal. So who really gives a shit?
And just because something is immoral for you, doesn't mean it is for everyone else.
>>677016829
>>677017333
>>677014136
Hmmm, how much do you weigh? And have you ever had a girlfriend. Or maybe a boyfriend? Either way I can promise you this: whether a woman is hot or not they don't like being objectified. So if you ever want a girlfriend that actually WANTS to have sex with you or ACTUALLY likes you I think you should learn some lessons. Ehhh, you'll still probably never gonna get one with that attitude. Hope you enjoy being a virgin
>>677016829
kek
>>677017491
bla bla bla
stop dressing like objects
>>677011246
You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit" due to the nature of the nude photographs being stolen and originating from celebrities. In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these nude photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances. If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
Source: Ph.D in clinical psychology.
>>677016824
gonna need moar
>>677016824
>>677016824
or as we call it, "you shit-posting"
>>677014181
I wanna be real quick and short with you. You are probably a man so you've probably never walked home in the dark scared, or afraid. You've probably never had someone stare at your chest when you're talking. But there is a difference between a femminazi, and women who want respect. Get it straight tween (which is what I'm guessing your age is) virgin
beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
>>677016824
dump all
>>677017745
>>677017491
Actually some people do like being objectified mr white knight phd. Learn to not generalize you retarded cunt. You talk a lot of trash that probably applies to yourself.
>>677014211
Double bait, nice
>>677003499
Hello my African American friend, I have checked ur dubs
>>677017491
>whether a woman is hot or not they don't like being objectified
Nice generalization cunt. Plenty of women love being objectified and enjoy being catcalled (they see it as compliments); and plenty don't. Women aren't all the same, dumbass
>>677017931
this is my fav
>>677014211
oldfag trying to be a rapist lolllllllz
>>677006229
Possibly water running down??
>>677017449
kek
>>677018207
>>677016751
Fuck you and you're idiotic morals. You're literally retarded.
>>677015533
"No officer, I didn't murder that man, it was manslaughter. if you're gonna arrest me, get it right."
>>677017081
Oh, no. You misunderstand me neanderthal (since all you seem to speak is nonsense anger at everyone that isn't like you) You can look and all that, but as soon as you exploit someone on the interwebs without their consent- well, I don't think I need to tell you that its morally wrong. But would you tell your mom or dad that you slobber over creepshot threads? Probably not, and its because you know its wrong.
>>677017187
Oh, so would you tell your close friends, Mom, and Dad that you enjoy looking up women's skirts? Probably not. Would you enjoy if I spread your dick pic all across the internet?
>>677018558
more?
>>677018678
Most of my files are too large :>>677018893
Is there any way to fix that?
>>677016751
Morals were created by jews to control us
Creepshot of my sister
>>677019163
I wouldn't tell my mom I slob over regular porn either. Is regular porn morally wrong as well? Nice try, fag.
>>677019505
your sister is black, anon.
>>677019361
I wouldn't enjoy telling my mom that I enjoy looking at women getting fucked in the ass. Is this also morally wrong?
>>677019662
fucking lol
Yo ass be all literally rapists.
Yo ass is violatin these dem hoes by viewin n' pluggin they photos without they consent; it don't matta whether or not these photos was taken by them, they freak, or a stranger on tha street fo' realz. A big-ass part of what tha fuck defines tha act of rape is tha lack of consent n' there is clearly a lack of consent here, so peek-a-boo, clear tha way, I be comin' thru fo'sho. These images is even mo' appealin ta you cuz there be a aspect of "forbidden fruit" cuz of tha nature of tha nude photographs bein jacked n' originatin from clowns. In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts up in hope dat yo big-ass booty is ghon peep suttin' special. It aint nuthin but tha nick nack patty wack, I still gots tha bigger sack. Da fact dat you have no morals or ethics be a sign dat you gotz a thugged-out deeper psychiatric issue goin on inside yo' head. Y'all KNOW dat shit, muthafucka! This be a gangbangin' form of horny-ass assault. Yo ass don't peep it as such cuz you done been blinded by rape culture.
>>677017683
Maybe you should stop thinking of people like objects, seem like it's a personal problem lol. Also I've never seen an object dress in a mini-skirt. Lolllls do you dress your objects in mini-skirts because if you do you have a serious mental problem. Although I'm sure you already do. You are probably an average retard
>>677019505
Damn man you can see her face. That's really hot
>>677002611
>>677002611
OP any moar of her or can u post the full size pic?
>>677019395
Only other creepshot. rest are regular nudes
>>677019662
Niggers use 4chan to Anon...
>>677020209
thats fine, who is she to you
>>677018207
Broooo keep going, you are a god!! Poast all ur oc pls
>>677020277
how does one anon?
>>677018030
I'm not saying some women don't like to be objectified in the sack but all the time. You don't think maybe women have been brainwashed their whole fucking lives to think that way? Really? Just like you probably haven't been taught your whole life not to cry "take it like a man" my father always said. Well now all you have is anger, how do you feel about that? Because imagine being objectified your whole life
>>677020342
>brooo
What were you trying to say?
>>677020481
>I'm not saying some women don't like to be objectified in the sack but all the time. You don't think maybe women have been brainwashed their whole fucking lives to think that way? Really? Just like you probably haven't been taught your whole life not to cry "take it like a man" my father always said. Well now all you have is anger, how do you feel about that? Because imagine being objectified your whole life
I aint sayin some dem hoes don't like ta be objectified up in tha sack but all tha time. Yo ass don't be thinkin maybe dem hoes done been domewashed they whole fuckin lives ta be thinkin dat way, biatch? Fo' realz, biatch? Just like you probably aint been taught yo' whole game not ta cry "take it like a man" mah daddy always holla'd. Y'all KNOW dat shit, muthafucka! Well now all you have be anger, how tha fuck do you feel bout that, biatch? Because imagine bein objectified yo' whole game
Gotta say, this thread has been pretty pathetic so far
>>677020277
Niggers can't spell
>>677018169
Wow, why don't you check the other thing I just read. All women have been brainwashed their whole lives to think that their appearance is their priority. Maybe show some fucking respect. Although I bet you have no self-respect so there is that
>>677017884
and I'll be holding my dick
>>677019448
Upload to mega, post the link
Bootin
>>677018687
hahaha ya, that's all you got? Mk, very descriptive. You're probably 12 years old.
>>677020306
Former fuck toy
>>677017516
>>677020737
>This thread has been pretty pathetic
>so let me just post something LITERALLY everyone has seen
>>677021045
second this
>>677019448
make a screenshot, post that
open it in paint, change size
save as jpeg, reduce quality
I took this a day before
>>677021160
damn thats a nice ass whats her name
>>677019361
Oh, no. That goes into porn- which is by the way (usually unless you are a fucking demented bastard) consensual. When it is just women in every day life not asking to get upskirt shots taken. Ya...does that sound morally sound to you?
any downshirt shots of sleeping girls?
>>677019492
No, morals were created when people evolved and stop being apes. Doesn't seem like you have gotten that far tho so
>>677011246
Legal as fuck dude. Freedom of the press. As long as it isnt in a private area I can take pictures and share whatever I want.
>>677021843
>>677019600
Ya ok incestuous bastard. Because porn with actors, and women on the street are the same. Lollls, can't even understand that. Have you been held back in school or failing? That is probably why.
>>677019448
Dont resize them it kills quality, just make a rar and upload to mega or mediafire
>>677021449
Heather
>>677021509
>>677020640
I might have to say I fell in love with this bruh
>>677022125
her upper arm is the size of my thigh jesus
We need more leg creeps
>>677011246
I understand this is not bait. But that you are actually brainwashed by the things you have "learned". Rape includes physical contact. That is not occuring here. Also, women are so easily fooled by disgusting men who lie to them and appeal to what they want, just to end up being someone who will share their nudes, or cheat on them, etc. I feel bad for them because men with morals don't easily lie to people to get an end result, and with the competitive nature of trying to attract a single girls attention now a days is reinforced further by "gender roles" which do not exist. Making unintelligent disgusting liars more likely to breed than honest good people
>>677010913
Nice work
>>677002611
Some OC, more if interested
>>677022333
This count?
>>677021421
Thought the shirt said Jonestown lol
>dont drink the kool aid kids.
>>677022666
Definitely need more of that ass
>>677021958
You tried to make the point that creep threads were morally wrong by saying
>would you tell your mom or dad that you slobber over creepshot threads?
To answer that: no. But I also wouldn't tell my mom or dad that I slobber over porn, or even beautiful women; are those also, morally wrong?
>>677011246
What the fuck are you doing in a /b/ creepshot thread if you are so ridiculously triggered?
Go complain somewhere else, we honestly don't give a shit.
>>677017072
If you told your mom or dad about anything sexual you do, it wouldn't go over well. No one is sexually normal. And if you are, you're holding back something for fear of being judged, or you're just boring.
>>677019163
So it's ok to record people for laughs. It's ok to record people for news. It's ok to record people for entertainment. ALL without consent of the person getting recorded. But when it comes to recording someone who's not even naked it's against the rules?
>>677005823
Are her initials NB?
>>677015819
Underrated
>>677015710
moar boar
>>677014944
you when to school to get a phd and i just masturbated for the second time today, and we're both here...you spent thousands of dollars and i jacked off.
>>677018893
More like "no, I didn't touch that painting, I just looked at it"
>>677015507
Leave it to a PhD do be this dimwitted.
Don't need consent in public.
I, unlike you, have a degree in STEM, so I learned how to think.
You are nothing more than a shaman.
>>677022666
>>677022927
Here's a clip I edited last night, I have a few days worth while she was here, I just need to edit them and blur
>>677022125
Moar!!!!
>>677020277
I was just making an observation - no need to use racist language, you uncouth failure of a human being.
>>677020737
Sauce??
>>677023756
Who is she? She related to you?
>>677016495
moar like dis
>>677020045
Fukking kek
>>677020045
This is cringe worthy.. If.you don't want to be objectified, don't dress like an object of sex. Men have sex drives because of higher testosterone levels than women. No, that does not mean we "cannot control" ourselves, it simply means we want sex more than women. Learn this, know this.
>>677023352
Nope
>>677023949
a friend.
>>677017690
>A big part of what defines rape is a lack of consent.
Therefore, If I buy you a pudding cup without your consent, it is comparable to rape?
one of my favs here
>>677024217
Damnit she looks pretty similar to this hot as fuck girl at my school
>>677024157
>not realizing this is making fun of the other one
>>677024266
It's the same concept, but most people generally enjoy unopened pudding.
>>677024340
Thanks for the nightmares...
>>677024482
Shit pasta if that's not a sad attempt to relate
>>677024309
Good fucking God! Hnnnnnnnnnnggggggggg I love when bitches sit like that
>>677016044
Here's more of her. I'll see if I can get the video
Anyone have the webm of some guy showing this girl his dick on omegle and her loving it? It's a rather popular webm.
Well the fun police certainly screwed with this thread
>>677019576
Bri?
>>677010913
I swear this has to be at my school. That book shelf is exactly like one in my humanities class
>>677017690
>>677025432
>>677026495
moar
>>677026452
Yes anon. That bookshelf at your school is a one of a kind piece. There's no way any other school has that same one
>>677026494
>>677025432
Or
>>677002611
my creepshot collection
http://www.streamboobs.com/xlatinahotx/
>>677026721
>>677026494
>>677025432
Orrrr
>>677026801
>>677026494
Thank you anon. I love you.
>>677026721
Full sauce?
>>677007960
god damn you gotta love them take-n-bake's
>>677026873
Anon start a omegle thread.
>>677024130
Are there more of these?
>>677026873
>1458227088751.webm
moar
>>677016044
Here's the vid. Sorry about the watermark
>>677011742
Lmfaoooo
>>677028962
this is gold!! moar?
>>677028962
>would cum in your sister
>>677029333
Sorry that's all I got
>>677020737
holy fucking kek, lmao
>>677026873
>>677026721
>>677026494
i want more fucking omegle webms immediately
>>677029976
fuck off fag this aint no omegle thread
