Post celeb nudes you're unsure are real or not, others verify whether they are.
>>675338343
I know it's not legit, or fully legit, was wondering if anyone knew source or had info though.
This?
>>675339047
Pretty sure legit duff.
Is this legit or CG'd?
>>675339314
I hope you're right
>>675339462
>>675338908
literally who
>>675339462
Fake Chloë.
>>675338343
![wdaIOO1[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/qBM1kb2.jpg "wdaIOO1[1].jpg")
>>675338343
It's Hayden
>>675339016
Bottom right, the womsn changing, is charlotte gainsbourg
![Lh6hXo4[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/p9EVPpW.jpg "Lh6hXo4[1].jpg")
>>675340030
>>675340030
>>675340307
Also, this
The picture as it appears in the book, with the photographer saying its an actress who is also elsewhere in the book, but wanted to do an anonymous nude. Marisa Miller, who many claim is the woman, is NOT an actress but a model, and she appears nude in the book elsewhere, showing her face.
She also says she removed a tattoo, and Hayden has a tattoo.
Are the supposed Lea Michele vids real?
>>675340450
Hayden got a tattoo well after this book was shot
>>675340307
also compare backgrounds, you can see it's the same room
Did Maddie Ziegler's nudes really leak?
I mean, I don't want to see them or you to post them, I'm just curious if that's true or if that's just some shit /b/ spread around like they usually do.
Didn't get a clear answer previously.
Are the fappening leaks of Aubrey Plaza legit?
>>675340749
>>675340789
>>675340749
The videos are 100%. The pics I have no clue.
>>675341004
didn't the vids turn out to be a lookalike?
Sarah Ellen?
>>675340730
Probably fake or something. What would she even have to show and who would she send her nudes to?
>>675341068
No, that was some butthurt faggot making shit up.
>>675340749
>>675340789
>>675340840
Pretty sure these were proved real by comparison pics of her wearing the same panties
>>675339593
Liz something. She was in a show called My Life as Liz, I think.
>>675340112
Thanks anon. Now I'm going to have to actually delete it.
Not really a nude, but is this a nipple/areola or is it just wishful thinking?
>>675341761
is she really getting DP by 2 genuine nigs and Google is still call her an actress?
how about VJ
>>675341892
I saw that as well. Either way I fap.
>>675339047
want to believe. but where are her tattoos?
>>675342072
The DP was by a porn actress, with the real actress's head shopped on. Same as with the GoT nude shame march.
This is said to be Jlaw, but can someone actually confirm it? Any proofs?
>>675342332
I see.
I want the Maroney pics
>>675342318
which?
>>675338343
Kat Dennings
>>675342332
and some other GoT nudes too
![tumblr_mrhq65dv2z1rli3uto1_r1_250[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/JKh8zEN.gif "tumblr_mrhq65dv2z1rli3uto1_r1_250[1].gif")
>>675342072
Oscar nominee Chloe Sevigny gave a BJ in Brown Bunny.
>>675342713
>inb4 emilia clarke has used flawless cgi forever for nudes while cersei's looked stilted and fake
Dove Cameron?
>>675342937
to a prosthetic
>>675343043
Why did you post this?
>>675343135
why are you such a foggtt?
>>675342402
It came out with her set, was not found by image search before that, but no definite proof I think.
My personal guess is that it's not her, but maybe Bradley Cooper or Nicholas Hoult can help you out
Or search some high res bikini shots of her for the moles?
>>675343093
...she agreed to perform unsimulated oral sex on co-star and director Vincent Gallo .
real or cg?
>>675342937
It's a little less graphic that being ass fucked by niggers.
>>675343211
....no why DID you post this pic? no slip, no nothing that has to do with this thread...
that being said, this always catches a few
>>675343440
That's a myth
>>675343518
bad shoop
>>675343135
From the same set as the possible nipple.
>>675343537
"Both Gallo and Sevigny have said the scene was authentic."
>>675343478
compare boobs to last weeks Vinyl episode and know the answer
>>675343043
>>675341892
I can't wait for Bad Neighbors or whatever it's called. Chloe and Selena in bikinis for half the movie.
>>675343537
That is very real.
>>675343518
>>675343478
it's from a movie, it's real
>>675343478
you could have just googled movies with her naked dude
seriously
do you even google?
>>675343929
oh, you're one of those. carry on :^)
>>675343738
no?
>>675344102
Fuck off
>>675340840
>>675340789
>>675340749
Real
>>675344354
another angle of her wearing the underwear on-screen
>>675344253
you need to calm down
>>675338343
I'm pretty sure this is Miley Cyrus before tattoos. Thank you for posting this thread
Is this Jlaw?
>>675344993
yes
>>675344354
>>675344447
thank you anon
>>675344993
Yes. was confirmed, was in the original Chain thread of the first leak.
I think this is Miley Cyrus after the tattoos. Thank you for posting this thread
>>675343836
Agreed. I'll be the guy in the very last row fapping.
>>675345081
Any proof that it is legit? I've seen it in the set. but i'm still not 100% sure.
>>675344993
anyone got more j-law? or blonde celebs
>>675339757
i was also wondering about that
>>675345241
she's in the same location and wearing the same clothes in other of her leaked pics
>>675345241
It looks like her, same carpet as in some other leaked nudes, same walls and she's really messy.
>>675339757
>>675345372
you can see her face? obviously real
>>675344993
I think so. I'm pretty sure this one is jlaw before it was animated. Thank you for bringing up Jennifer Lawrence
>>675341360
fake, just some chick who looks like sophie turner
>>675343537
That scene is actually real, they were a couple in real life
>>675345654
>nude
Moar chloe mortez please please please
>>675339462
Would most certainly like closure on this.
>>675342976
same necklace
>>675345654
fake
>>675345770
look closer..
>>675338343
any idea on this being legit?
>>675345258
>>675345241
I'm having the same issue with this one. I'm pretty sure it's j-law after it was animated. Thank you for asking for more Jennifer Lawrence
>>675345770
Did you not pay your google bill this month?>>675345770
>>675345833
so real?
nice
>>675345831
Not her. Tattoo's obviously shopped. Closure.
>>675345855
99% legit
>>675345654
bear.
nobody notices the bear.
>>675345833
Not to mention the hair, lips and tits size.
>>675345855
that's a real one
>>675342976
Real, and there's a second one
>>675342976
>>675345833
same necklace again
Does Paige have any nudes?
>>675346059
not 100?
>>675344993
This other pictures show what looks like the same carpet and also the same phone and probably the same door.
Any more proof is welcome or is this more than enough?
>>675342697
real
there were also a few more pics of kat leaked
>>675345654
I recognise that gay blowjob!
>>675345808
Fuck off and make your own thread.
Elle Fanning?
I'm just wondering if it's ever proven fake. The proof in the photo is enough for me.
>>675346500
other than that the room is messy and seems low rent no one has brought up any solid counters to that evidence in the pic
>>675346348
No face, so as close as you can get.
>>675344354
>>675344447
Well the underwear is clearly different, if this is supposed to claim they're the same pair.
>>675346500
the dress on the floor really sells it for most
>>675343093
No it wasn't. They were dating at the time
>>675346778
It's the same see through polka dots underwear
Is this Jlaw? A lot of people say it's not her, but it looks a lot like her? What do you think?
Is there a torrent or something with all the pics of the fappening with no duplicates and no fakes?
>>675345855
legit
>>675347003
put the panties in the movie don't have the frills...look again
>>675346202
>>675346255
Real, got it. Thanks.
>>675346659
Well, if they're celebs, it doesn't mean they're not messy. Just look at JLaw's leaks.
As for "low rent", maybe she's just minimalistic or has a bunch of shit on the other side of the room where she doesn't sleep.
>>675346806
Agree! That's what made me believe it's her in the first place.
always wondered ,is this a legit xray?
>>675346500
can you post the original one as well?
>>675347382
it does, it's just a far away pic
>>675347192
In this pic they look a lot alike so i'm not sure it is legit or not...
>>675340314
real
>>675346778
so?
>>675345914
Doesnt even look like her fucking goyim.
>>675347382
>>675347590
also to add, the polka dots are not the same pattern...the leaked pics..the dots have more space between them, come on
>>675347192
Looks like her, but not her, doesn't seem busty enough
>>675347003
Dude, do you really think there is only one see-through black polka dot design?
In these
>>675340749
>>675340789
there are less dots and they're further apart, and the main obvious difference is in this >>675344447 there is a seam going down the middle of the ass crack.
>>675347702
that's the angle
>>675347755
Ignoring the panties, does that look like the same ass to you?
>>675347797
ok, you're just desperate to bolieve. carry on
>>675340314
obviously real. You can tell by the face and how its from a different picture.
>>675347755
It's notable she's wearing such a similar pair though
>>675347895
No but I also know that angles can make the same person look different (better), so it's impossible to tell.
>>675347736
>>675347736
Well i've searched for the original source, but all i found was saying that it's jlaw... Anyone have any source of that pic, that says it's not her for sure?
>>675347949
the panties weren't the only evidence cited anyway
>>675347895
Yes
>>675348064
a change of angle does not make dots further apart closer though
>>675348031
So??
Girl's dont have a strict panty collection of all similar ones, and black underwear is probably the most popular. It could be fucking anyone.
>>675338343
What about this op?
http://frtyb.com/go/gQ0i_bAaEj/Lilsis
>>675348298
why are people arguing over that, you can clearly see it is her pussy comparing it to her fap videos
>>675344354
She's wearing the same little chain on her wrist in the top left and bottom right pics
>>675348298
Oh no, I was talking about the ass itself. As in if it is her then it looks better from the below angle, but that's pretty much true for everyone!
>>675348397
you can see her face in her fapping vids
>>675348481
and the hands match
>>675348458
I'm not arguing that it isn't her, just that the panties are not the same
and why? because I can
>>675347755
>>675347702
None of that means it's not Aubrey in the pics
>>675344993
>>675339047
>>675347533
i never even watched Star Trek but I've fapped to her 100x easy
apparently Jessica Alba pregnant, is it?
>>675347949
see rest of >>675344354
>>675345855
Confirmed real shortly after the fappening, also re-confirmed more recently with new stuff.
>>675349056
On the top right, is that a dude balls deep in her, or is she just sitting on a bed.
>>675349209
it is, there are candid pics of her in that hat
>>675349209
other leaked pics showed her face, so yes
Does Jennifer lawerence's nudes
>>675348298
going close up would
>>675349209
I think it's real but it defeats the purpose unless you are a prego fetish
>>675349774
seeing her tits is always welcome
>>675346500
do you have the original ass pic by itself?
>>675341761
where is this scene from and who is the actress??
>>675349830
I suppose. Is it true she has herpes?
>>675350210
I just google the name +nude
>>675340112
>>675350072
I see atleast 2 fakes in this.
>>675350072
masterful
don't recall seeing her boobs, is this legit?
>>675352139
Bluray release without cinema borders, yeah.
>>675352139
You would be right, you couldn't see them. Shooped.
>>675352980
>>675352139
yeah, if it was just a case of the frame getting uncropped with a widescreen release, she would have been wearing pasties
>>675352980
>>675352139
>675352139
>>675353805
>>675352980
>>675353805
Ok, it's a fake, gotcha.
>>675353805
You're actually correct, but they used CG to remove the pasties for the blu ray release. It's kinda obvious.
>>675354305
sort of fake
>>675354885
>>675354833
>>675354459
>>675354305
>>675353805
>675353805
Not in the slightest bit fake, look at the fucking webm you shitposters
>>675354261
>>675354261
you don't notice the obvious CG nips?
>>675354833
Yes. She wasn't supposed to be shown nude in the filmed release, so she would have been wearing pasties that were hidden off-screen. The blu ray without cinema borders >>675352297 would have shown them so there's some FX wizardry used for digital nips
>>675354261
I'd launch my ship for that
I think this is Caitlyn Jenner topless, can anyone confirm?
>>675356657
correct, but the ass shots are real, though
>>675343836
I bet it's going to be for like a 3 minute scene.
>>675357226
That's a m-m-m-m-monster!
I believe this one but understand people's speculation about it
>>675357226
>want to bust the fuck out laughing pissing on the floor
>realize im at the uncle never knew's wake surrounded by sad people
>mfw
>>675356657
No you fucking idiot. How this works is they shot it nude. The studio either didn't want that much graphic nudity in the theatrical version or they thought her fake tits looked to unrealistic for the time period. Then the directors cut was released with full nudity. Now because some people have the cropped out version, they automatically figure there's no way they actually shot her nude.
>>675342564
its cp
>>675359008
she doesn't have fake tits...
>>675356657
You kids really don't know how to read and comprehend anything do you?
>>675359213
Wow
You do your research well...
>>675359225
nor u
>>675359408
Wow, how compelling
>>675359213
Your whole argument just caved bud.
>>675359448
>way older pic of her tits completely shoved together by a dress
>>675359008
They never intended to have any nudity in the film though, it was meant to be PG13
>>675359676
How does that completely unrelated thing cave anything?
>>675359712
Way older pic of her before she got her fucking implants you faggot child
>>675359566
>>675358652
This is from a video of some dude beating off in her face while she's passed out but I can't find it
>>675340307
literally autism
>>675359908
Older as in she is older.
>>675359855
It proves you have no idea what the fuck your are talking about. Go to bed.
>>675360027
Her having or not having fake tits has nothing to do with the film
>>675359008
source on it being shot nude
cos that's not normal when they don't intend to show any of it
>>675359996
You are autist.
There I said that in a way you could understand.
>>675359910
>>675358652
There it is!
>>675359448
This comparison is retarded
>>675360372
Source on them not intending to have nudity
![Emma+Watson+Candid+Bikini+pic_9[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/SBLvba3.jpg "Emma+Watson+Candid+Bikini+pic_9[1].jpg")
>>675339016
Agreed on Charlotte G.
Plus, the Emma photo had the hat added to make it look like this was all in the same series.
Waste of time.
>>675338343
This is Hayden, there are more from this set.
>>675360477
Yet it's actually her you faggot.
>>675360859
post em
>>675360604
The fact that there isn't any in the regular film.
>>675340687
God, I want to impregnate her.
>>675360909
Where did I say it wasn't her?
I said the comparison is terrible.
She's wearing a dress that pushes her tits together to a comical degree in the right one.
>>675357226
"Caitlyn Gender".
>>675360976
WOW
It's called a theatrical version.
Aka a studio edited for a theatrical audience version that said studio agrees with.
A directors cut is the directors version of a film, usually including UNCUT versions of scenes that were either deleted or manipulated.your theatrical version is the "fake" version.
Shut the fuck up.
>>675360125
You or the kid claiming you know everything about why her tits are fake in the film, then claiming her tits are real in real life, while not knowing they're actually fake in real life makes all your other points irrelevent because you were wrong about something so obvious.
Get it you giant fuck up of a human?
>>675361403
>he thinks the studio doesn't control filming
>>675362107
You assume things about anons just to attempt to sound more correct than the already correct anon.
>>675362065
her tits being natural or enhanced has nothing to do with it and you know it
>>675360604
>makes claim and can't back it up
>>675362107
>illuminati controls the directors every move from behind the curtain
Ayyy lmao
>>675362490
You literally did exactly the same thing. And I say it was a story I read. It's basic film making process.
>>675340314
I bet her pussy is much tighter than that.
>>675341892
Don't know why that pic is darker, but in the vid, you can clearly see her pokie, and I don't think it would've shifted that much.
>>675362673
I didn't say*
>>675362528
well actually
>>675341360
I also know a girl who looks exactly like that.
Her name is Lana Hair. On Facebook her name might be Lana Breonne or Lana Mayo.
>>675362673
>It's basic film making process.
You actually think all actors who aren't shown nude in a scene were actually naked on set?
>>675362821
Yuuuuup. Conversation is so caved, it's became a canyon of bullshit.
>>675359008
you can see her pasties in some brief shots in the theatrical release you know
>>675362955
You actually think what I said applies to every single film? Not everyone does shit the same. Some actresses are comfortable shooting nude so they do it just in case. Some get doubles. Some only do shoulder up shots, ect.
But claiming they cgi'd tits onto a woman that posed completely full frontal nude years before the film, who then got fake tits probably just to show them in films is ridicules.
>>675363605
I didn't say tits, I said nipples. They did they same thing to Olivia Wilde in a film where her pasties ended up being visible. She'd done nudity already before that film and has done it since.
If they don't want nudity in the film there won't be any, regardless of the actress.
>>675363409
Or...they cgi'd bleach spots to cover her actual tits...just like you assume that 10 plus years ago they had good enough cgi to produce that scene when the best they really could do was pic related.
>>675347192
It looks absolutely nothing like her.... Are you fucking blind?
>>675364041
That was terrible on release, and because it was rushed at the end of production. Bad example.
>>675342402
Could be her friend who was in a bunch of pics and took the other ones of her
>>675364194
Fuck off with your "muh opinions are facts"
>>675364041
Troy came out in 2004, after LOTR. I think they would be capable of two red nips in a couple of two second shots.
>>675364680
How the fuck is that an opinion? It's a literal fact that it was rushed at the end of production.
Kids these days.
>>675364701
You think everything in lord of the rings looks real? I wish I had as good of an imagination.
stop fighting kids, just post nude and lets all be happy
>>675364769
Not what I'm referring to actual kid.
Did you forget you claimed my example to not be worthy of your fact sniffing twat?
>>675364041
>>Or...they cgi'd bleach spots to cover her actual tit
that's some hilarious backtracking there
>>675365072
you claimed that was "the best they could do" even though it was shit even in 2001
>>675365147
No. It's actually reverse psychology. Child.
>>675343537
that crappy movie has no budget for cgi
>>675365357
good thing there's other methods than that
>>675364885
Where did I say that?
get a room
>>675346500
>same phone
>>675365258
My point was, they didn't start coming out with acceptably real looking cgi until about 2010. All cgi before then had a too smooth look with no micro editing done. the matrix reloaded (2003) fight scene with the million agent smiths is a better example? They still look like horrible shit. And that was top of the line effects.
>>675366307
I think they could accomplish two nipples in 1 second shots before 2010.
>>675364363
With all the moles Jlaw has it's most probably her lol
>>675365511
Dude fuck off with this he said I said, but I didn't say bullshit.
>>675363605
They didn't CG the tits, just covered the pasties with digital nipples. A lot of films have done it.
>>675366451
I think if you look at the Blu Ray version of Troy...you see real world micro detail. Which was unachievable in 2004 with computer imaging.
>>675366307
>>My point was, they didn't start coming out with acceptably real looking cgi until about 2010
oh come on
>>675338343
Fucking idiots, Marisa miller
>>675366992
Nope. Proven to be Hayden multiple times now.
>>675366451
>>675366307
plus, do they really look all that real looking? >>675352139
>>675361403
>>675366307
>>675364041
>>675366783
the director's cut of Troy came out in 2007, three years later
>>675367165
Fucking trolls. Stupid ones at that.
>>675366889
Not my fault you probably accept the Star Wars prequels as a great special effects feat.
>>675367481
Who are trolls?
>>675367505
No, but I accept this 2006 CGI as a great special effects feat.
>>675367288
What's your point? They spent 3 years editing in what they actually shot? Or the cgi was better for them to edit in what they already shit so they did...wasting studio money...
>>675367856
No, I'm just saying the extra work for the longer cut was done later, not around the time of release.
>>675367660
I'll give you, Harry Potter and MOST of the potc franchise had very early great effects. But may I raise you with this 1996 classic?
>>675368362
Forgot pic I guess
Is this actually Kaley Cuoco?
>>675368498
For 1996 they were pretty damn good.
>>675366307
>>675366307
>All cgi before then had a too smooth look with no micro editing done
Her nipples do have that too smooth look though >>675352139
>>675346500
If her, she has a cute little butt.
>>675339047
Is this the duff muff?
>>675368916
looking again they actually do look sort of weird/shiny
>>675340749
>>675340789
>>675340840
just watch her masturbation video
fgt
>>675368362
The point being, if >>675367660 was possible in 2006, then in 2007 they were capable of moderately realistic looking nipples to cover up visible pasties in literally less than 5 seconds of footage
>>675369459
that's blurry and far away, those are clear closeups of her vag
