Go ahead, /b/
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Go ahead, /b/
>>675016986
b because most of it is a woman
>>675017134
fucking faggot
>>675017226
Right, cause option A is fucking hot. Dipshit
>>675017226
Fucking faggot
B. There's still an ass you can fuck and you can just tune out the thingy hanging in front.
Guy with vagina vs guy with tits
You choose
>>675017226
So you chose a?
>>675017226
Fucking faggot.
sauce on B?
Right, because men make the best women.
Fuck off. Neither is a fucking option. It is legitimately possible to not be attracted to either of these.
For instance, if you had A beside a similarly masculine male my answer would be that I'm attracted to neither but would prefer to fuck A.
You get one of two choices:
1. Ask people what they're attracted to and accept that "neither" and "both" are actually options
OR
2. Pose this as a hypothetical where you MUST fuck one of them, in which case your hypothetical actually requires someone to fuck whatever is least offensive to them.
That being said, I'm actually attracted to B. But it's worth mentioning that you could have easily constructed this in a way in which I'd have been attracted to neither.
Now, either concede the point or answer me this: You're MUST be attracted to either horses or toasters. Would you rather fuck a horse or a toaster?
>>675017480
20% tighter
10% warmer
>>675017441
>he think fucking a man dressed as a girl is more straight than fucking a woman dressed like a dude
fags
>>675017575
Actually it's a girl with muscles and body hair on the left
>>675017226
so you would fuck someone who has more muscles and looks manlier than you than just penetrate a shemale's ass
>>675016986
What are secondary sexual characteristics?
talk about being in between a rock and a hard place.
Tbh every tranny looks like a ugly guy with makeup
>>675017678
Camila Rodriguez I think... but it's hard to find porn of her
>>675017637
i choose neither but if they point a gun in my head i chose the pussy
both
Obviously the message here is too explain you people that tranny porn does not atract the same way gay porn does... that is all.
>>675016986
B
>have sex with B from the back
>reach around
>pretend it went all the way through
>>675016986
Here's the conundrum:
I am not attracted to A because A looks like a man despite having a vagina.
I am not attracted to B because B has a penis despite looking like a woman.
>>675017800
Wow really no homo
Both are guys, both options are gay. You are gay.
>>675016986
I'd cut b's dick off and get to work in pooper.
>>675018016
You can do whatever you want sexually speaking
Gender is a social construct. Would wife the chick on the right, adopt babbybois and raise traplets.
>>675018522
The one on the left was actually born a girl. His name is Buck Angel
>>675018920
Beautiful :')
>>675018503
Naw man, kinda homo. I'm totally cool with that.
>>675018522
So a nonzero amount of male characteristics makes it a guy? I get that you're not attracted to either but just as a nomenclature question it's kinda interesting, right? The only way to be classified as a woman is to have entirely female characteristics but if you have a single male characteristic you're a guy. Kinda weird if you think about it?
Again, this is from a guy who literally doesn't give a fuck whether you classify them both as guys, I'm just asking to see what the philosophy behind this is.
>>675016986
That's bullshit. I can absolutely say neither. It is binary. I am heterosexual, that means I'm not attracted to men or masculine features. Left has a male body, even it has a vagina. Right has a penis, which I am also not into. Therefore, neither one interests me, and forcing me to pick one proves nothing other than that I'm being forced to select one of two objectionable choices.
Sorry, but you'll have to find another way to justify your faggotry.
>>675016986
Fuck, if I can't even feel anything how I am supposed to choose
>>675020288
Anyone who gets dubs is openly or closeted gay.
>>675020288
>>675020792
Explaining the choice is your part of the game, not mine
A feminine body unspoiled by a stanky fish hole but instead endowed with a nice cock is the perfect woman.
>>675016986
Both gay because they're both males
/thread
>inb4 can't thread your own post
>>675020288
>>675020792
This.
I'm totally behind asking "which option is least objectionable to you?" as a hypothetical. But prefacing a hypothetical with "you must be attracted to one" is just stupid.
That being said...
>>675017800
Horses or toasters, bitch?
Seriously, if you were required by the god of hypotheticals, attracted or not, to stick your dick into one, which would you pick?
>>675019074
>Born a girl
>His name
Pick one, and only one. That's a fucking abomination for all I care.
>>675016986
I'm gay. I'm a bottom, but I'm attracted to femininity, and manly features I don't like. So I would say B. The same is true for straight guys, they don't like manly features. Unfortunately, A's body is a manly feature. B's DICK is a manly feature. You're gay either way.
B because she's got a dick.
I'm more desensitized to a woman with a cock than I am a man with a cunt.
>I'd let her fuck me anyway.
B. A could join if she strapped up
>>675016986
Stop trying to convince us traps are fine because a trap is hotter than a man with a vag. Traps are disgusting and you're hurting threads you baits
>>675018141
>neither
Bend over A and pound the want to be a man out of "her". Remember a pussy is still a pussy
>>675019454
Well, in almost every Transporn or whatever you call it you can clearly see that it isn't a girl, just look at the face and the tits. Most of the time they look really ugly and just disgusting, so in most cases you can tell a 'female' is a male even without seeing the dick.
>>675019074
I don't know why, but all girls who turn into males just look like males and not something in between
>>675021291
If you had to have sex with one of them
>ib45 hurr durr, I am supersmart an choose neither.
If you choose neither, people will scrape off your skin with a cheese grater before throwing salt at you
>>675022008
>Stop trying to convince us traps are fine because a trap is hotter than a man with a vag. Traps are disgusting and you're hurting threads you baits
k.
Now answer:
If forced to have sex with one of them, which?
>>675022414
Try to force me faggot
Can't do that kind of thing to a grown man
>>675022654
Nobody's capable nor really want to force you.
I'm merely asking a question.
So you can either pick one or evade the question by warping the rules of it into something you know it's not and pretend you're being clever by choosing neither,
>>675022103
So maybe B isn't the right choice for this argument but are you saying if you actually can't tell gender without seeing a dick then it's a girl?
Again, this is me being annoying with hypotheticals. I'm willing to call both of them something inbetween and just leave it at that.
I just like the assertion that both have to be men. I feel like it should be either:
A. The decision isn't binary
B. The binary decision is more equal
Because what most of these threads tell you is that the decision is binary and that any male characteristic at all makes it a guy. I'm not about to say anything about people covering up insecurities because I don't think that's it. What I do think is that people want there to be some hard justification with their preferences because while they're completely secure in their sexuality they don't feel comfortable establishing that security by going "This is what I like, there's not a single goddamn way to classify it other than by what gives me a boner, and that's fucking fine."
Seriously, /b/. I think it'd be a lot healthier for you lot to quit worrying about what is or isn't a guy, what does or doesn't make you gay, and just focus on what does or doesn't get you hard. Then fap to the shit that does regardless of whether it's a horse or a toaster or whatever you sick fucks are into.
>>675022223
So close though
>>675023089
No you don't understand
A man needs a boner to have sex
>>675023643
blue pill or surgically implanted rod in your dick, your choice.
>>675023899
I'll go for the red pill
>>675022654
Okay. NOW I'm ready to call insecurities. It's a hypothetical.
If anon asked you if you'd rather have $100,000 dollars or fuck Scarlett Johansson you wouldn't be making a massive shitfest about the fact that you'd pick "both" and that that's the only option because you're such a badass and no one can force you to pick one or the other.
This is insecure.
"I'm not interested in either" is a perfectly fine response to someone telling you that you must be.
But saying you're going to fight a guy because they can't make you? That's just some kinda pussy shit. You need to pick "neither" so badly that you have to reassure yourself that you're not gay by trying to pick a fight over the internet? What kinda faggot are you?
>>675023643
Viagra.
Problem solved.
Now make choice.
The question is simple. There's just two answers. You know this. You know that all other ways of avoiding one of those two options is not really answers here.
You know exactly what the question is.
>>675024506
I'll go for the vag because shit disgusts me
>>675019454
Some people seem to think of it in the same way as the one drop philosophy when it comes to being black. one drop of "black blood" and you are just referred to as black. It is interesting to see connections like this.
>>675023643
No, you're trying to dodge.
>>675023899
This anon makes a perfectly valid point. Giving you a strapon would also be acceptable as far as I'm concerned.
Don't pretend "neither" was you saying "I doubt I could get it up under those circumstances".
If your argument is with the possibility of the hypothetical you actually have to say so and be granted an answer or possible options. YOU chose to fight a hypothetical person, then tried to mulligan by saying you couldn't get it up.
So either answer the question or fuck off. If an endless series of events that answered your every inane question happened and the gods themselves forced you to fuck one or the other (you can't even kill yourself to get out of it).
Which would you pick?
First: A or B?
Second: Horse or Toaster?
>>675021364
Horse easy question.
>>675016986
I'm attracted to the female form, the fact that it has male genitalia just means that I understand and can relate to the mechanics of what they are experiencing and if I can make them feel pleasure then that in and of itself will boost my confidence allowing me to enjoy the moment. So logically speaking I feel like B would be the better of the two choices.
The only reason why people struggle with choosing one over the other is because they add the social/sexual/religious contexts and filters that may help to govern but also can limit their life and the life experiences.
Is this supposed to be an argument that liking traps isn't gay?
How about this: you're gay if you're attracted to either picture. You're gay if you're attracted to anything other than a regular woman.
>>675017897
it's not a woman dressed like a dude, it's a woman with hairy artificial pecs, abs, a beard and a overall A MAN. You're gay if you even get a boner from her..
>>675025132
Right? It's so weird that people assume these things have to be binary. Like either you're black or not or you're male or female.
The race thing is even stupider since we ALL share ancestors at some point.
With gender there's at least the ability to go "My chromosomes say I'm male and I've got all the parts that prove I am and none of the parts that'd suggest I'm not. I also mentally perceive myself to be male."
Which actually leads to arguing the opposite sometimes, where the people who dislike the idea of binary gender to such a degree start to rail against the existence of male or female.
Gender is kinda a spectrum kinda deal (much as I hate to quote tumbler) and since "gay" is a complicated enough concept that we're never going to pin it down I'm willing to accept that both A and B are gay. But please, can we at least admit that under any not-stupid definition A and B cannot be the exact same gender? If we're calling it binary then one of the two should theoretically be female, if not then throw them wherever on the gender spectrum you want, but calling them both the exact same gender is just dumb.
>>675025495
Yeah, I'll have to admit, horse is probably the right answer to that one. The reason I picked those two was that I really don't feel like sticking my dick in either but if I was hypothetically required to I'd fuck the horse.
It helps that I feel like most people would pick the same thing for this one, illustrating my point.
It further illustrates the point that at least a tiny handful of people would probably enjoy fucking the horse without the hypothetical. Also, like, one weird toaster fucker.
But that's the interesting thing about hypotheticals. Some people get to discuss which one they'd actually WANT to fuck, and the others get to consider which one they WOULD fuck if they had to.
>>675026362
Landwhales are also female, Im a heterosexual male and I'm not attracted to Landwhales
I'm attracted to persons that fit certain criterias and real female genitalia is one of them
>>675026031
Possibly? But while I'm arguing bullshit let's assume that it doesn't ACTUALLY matter which is gay.
Let's assume that you hypothetically HAVE to fuck one (I'll leave it to you to decide whether being forced to do something gay is actually gay or not because that isn't actually important to the hypothetical).
Which would you pick?
Attraction doesn't matter. You could be attracted to both or neither and the hypothetical still wouldn't give a fuck. See earlier comments about viagra and the fact that you can't kill yourself or others if you want a clever way out.
>>675016986
The answer is B. Straight men are attracted to the female form, Face, tits etc..If youre straight you'd pick B because of the form
>>675016986
B is prettier. I'd do B. A looks like a man.
>>675027027
I'd go for the toaster before the horse, it'll be like Masturbation that looks incredibly stupid
>assuming the toaster is not powered
The horse would kick the horsefucker half dead
>>675027576
That's actually a really good point though. What you are or aren't attracted to goes way beyond gender. For some people that means their attractions include stuff in more than just one gender and for some people that means they're only attracted to a subset of a single gender (obviously for people who are Bi it's actually a mix of both since they'd wind up with a subset of BOTH genders)
So your point further reinforces that is isn't a binary "I like men" or "I like women" and then figuring out what counts as what.
Because you're interests are "I like specific women".
>>675028275
Thank you, brave anon, for illustrating my point. Because you clearly don't want to fuck either toasters or horses but you still actually had the balls to pick one or the other.
That being said, I would say that the toaster is off for the hypothetical. They still do have a lot of scratchy coils of wire though, which is what made me decide I'd take my chances trying to ease it into a horse and hope to not get the crap kicked out of me.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is how to answer a hypothetical without trying to negate the basic premise to prove something to people who don't give a flying fuck about you.
>>675028480
Yes and neither a nor b fits into that group of women and this is part of being heterosexual and now go fuck of with your faggot shit
>>675018309
kek
>>675016986
Consider that both of them are male, the one of the left is just an inside out dick
They're both gross. You ever hear one of those things talk? Traps are still very much men, sound like gay dudes. Same with trans men.
>>675029184
Says the man who's worried enough about his sexuality that he must pick neither.
If I offered you Jennifer Lawrence or Scarlett Johanasson would you just screech at me that it would be gay not to pick both? No, you'd pick one because that'd be easy for you to rationalize.
Hell, if I had to ask you to kill a puppy or a kitten I'll bet you'd pick one because while you'd like to pick "neither" you're not insecure about the fact that if forced to pick one or the other you actually know the answer.
Because deep down you do. You're not attracted to either. For all I care both make you gay. But if push comes to shove, you COULD make that choice, and it probably wouldn't even involve a lot of thinking about it.
>>675030446
As I already said if I get Viagra and have no other choice I'd go for a but at this point it's not about being attracted to anything anymore, it would be purely about not getting shit onto my dick
B all the way
B, that's so hot
>>675017800
u fukn idiot just chose one this has nohting to do with real life you insecure faggot
>>675030446
Amen brother
675031700 get
>>675031935
>off by 235
neither
>>675016986
B all the way no shame would even blow and bottom, would ravage/10
>>675018141
Lol so you preferencia the muscular manly body, fucking faggot
>>675031179
Awesome, that's all I asked. I applaud you for being secure enough to just say "fuck it" and answer the question. And yeah, not getting shit on your dick is a good rationalization for A.
>>675031386
I chose B earlier. Again, I'm arguing against people who bother to post in this thread just to "opt out".
I'm completely secure in how much of a faggot I am (and by any definition of one I'm a bit of one)
Really, this whole conversation started by me getting annoyed that people still argue that people MUST be attracted to one or the other (which isn't true at all) and then arguing for the purity of hypotheticals which assume nothing about the anon but people still fight them.
>>675017897
lmao, autists like you would actually fuck the monstrosity to prove how non-gay you are
A has everything wrong, B has everything right.
B easy. i think shemales are hot anyway and that's a pretty good looking one. Also, i bet B is more into pleasing cock than A, so...