You love, you lose CONT.
Old threads:
#1 >>674669522 https://archive.is/8rsvU
#2a >>674668846 https://archive.is/mg1gb
#2b >>674669522 https://archive.is/IFEiV
#3 >>674677583 https://archive.is/O2kHC
Hayley Atwell
Anon got any more of this girl?
what do you all think about my qt
>>674681022
>>674680754
>what do you all think about my qt
I thought you said
>>674678581
>oh my god shut up
>>674677311
>oh shut up and just enjoy
You lied???
>>674681115
>>674681079
dude that ebonesses tits are literally smaller than sky's
just admit it
>>674681237
They are.
But she has other big things.
Skye literally has no one big thing. Even dick.
>>674679815
Too late man. Years, too late. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>>674681440
You are pardonned.
>>674679815
Sauce?
>>674681421
So? I still like her medium/small things.
Where my eczema bro at?
>>674680626
lost
>>674681744
>Where my eczema bro at?
Her nipples look like two pimples of eczema.
>>674682027
dude atleast i can see sky without pixelation
step it up compadre
>>674679695
>>>674678581 (You)
>oh my god shut up
>in other news why did the other thread die
Answer #1:
>>674679625
>Because OP forgot to mention
>for anons study and reference
>that old threads existed.
Answer #2:
>>674668969
>Thread is dying.
>/b/ is too fucking fast
>and useless without a cached 404 version.
Answer #3:
>>674670507
>Continuation threads on /b/ always die a premature death.
>>674682249
Saved.
>>674682173
/b/ is literally too fast to post HD images.
I’m breathless.
>>674682237
i think it's because the mods/janitors remove every thread that already has a thread for it, even if the original thread is over image limit. oh well.
>>674682684
theres a difference between HD, normal, and MS-Paint tier.
>>674682780
Interesting body.
Frida Kahlo has nothing large (other than eyebrows). She’s just pretty.
>>674682934
>i think it's because the mods/janitors remove every thread that already has a thread for it, even if the original thread is over image limit. oh well.
Yes, it feels like mods delete continuation threads. The problem is that it often happens AFTER old thread is gone.
You should like those tits.
I just like her face.
/b/ is unreasonably fast.
If I stop for just a second,
this thread will 404.
>>674684005
In my opinion, that bitch is ugly. No offence.
I mean, a unibrow, man?
>>674683585
>>674682934
>Yes, it feels like mods delete continuation threads.
>The problem is that it often happens AFTER old thread is gone.
Or perhaps someone else starts a parallel continuation thread
without reporting it in the ancestror thread nor in the rightful descendant thread
and mods delete the rightful descendant thread
because the bastard continuator thread IS MORE POPULAR.
Pure nazism.
Captcha doesn’t help.
>>674684186
Can one unibrow
erase whole beauty?
You mad?
>>674684203
>>674679877
haha wow i made that thread and thought mods were gonna ban it so i left it. whaddaya know.
>>674684589
not mad. just...confused.
>>674684186
What if she had TWO unibrows? Or TEN?
>>674684706
>haha wow i made that thread and thought mods were gonna ban it so i left it. whaddaya know.
Hahahah. Traitor infidel reversed to mother faith. Good for you. Archived your bastard thread: https://archive.is/Hpc5j ;-)
>>674685050
looks like some bitch in a toothpaste commercial.
>>674684976
why you hef to be mad? its only game
Let’s see which one the mods will delete.
I’m getting weaker though.
so I could die before thread dies.
>>674685353
forgot sky pic
I wonder how many “you love, you lose” threads are right now around.
Because it seems like this thread is getting only your and mine attention.
Or maybe we’ve been shadowbanned...
>>674685682
two. This one and my sky one. and theres a celeb thread. the usual posters have probably been split between the 3.
nice qt.
>>674685850
>Or maybe we’ve been shadowbanned...
...and you are the mod...
>>674679815
Oh god why would you post that image.
The day /b/ went too far
>>674685989
>...and you are the mod...
...and I am the sole user.
>>674686034
That’s because /b/ is too fast.
I had no time to waste.
Because /b/ is so fast,
user can only shitpost.
>>674686300
I'd fuck it
>>674686514
>I'd fuck it
They are actually very pretty
if you disregard
their microcephaly.
>>674686414
Never remind anyone of that day though. Come on man there's just some shit you don't post
Can I already stop posting in this thread?
I want to go home.
>>674687095
Sorry, mate...
>saying this in my voice
>>674687222
>222
Self-checkout.
Why are my threads always mine
abandoned by everyone from respective ancestral threads?
Are my threads even bumping?
Why are ancestral threads populated
unlike my threads?
Are mods playing dirty?
>>674687021
I wonder what happens if you pull it's arms
>>674687794
No idea whether she feels pain.
I think she does.
Possibly not for long though.
>it
So trannies aren’t female enough for you
and now women too?
>>674687984
what
>>674688112
You scorn me when I call Caitlyn Jenner “she”.
>>674681548
www.newfag.com
>>674679815
gone too soon anon
>>674688469
>timestamp
You mean, screenshot?
>>674688369
what 2.0
>>674688753
kek
>>674688771
Even computer knows that Caitlyn Jenner is a she.
>>674689012
>vai ser vovó
just how?
>>674689204
Just click on that image
and read.
>>674679815
too soon
>>674679815
Too soon, anon.
>>674689721
nigga, that's a door weight
>>674688594
www.youreright.org
From an anon bitching a while back
>>674689781
Sorry, I’ll try to be less violent.
>>674679815
This fucking babe
>>674684005
Yeah, so hot that Diego Rivera cheat on her like 100 times.
Bump.
this thread will pass into the ether
of millions of others just like it
where millions of us spent our nights
and i'll still have a folder filled to the brim with sky
>>674690400
>>674689721
>>674686514
>>674687794
>>674687984
>>674688771
>>674689204
>>674689406
>>674689544
It’s a WOMAN.
SHE, not IT.
Don’t try being less smart than an AI.
>>674690910
This now is the only thread you have.
Your bastard thread dead.
>>674691422
oh i know
i made a new one
>>674691095
i think it's going to die though. too late at night for sky.
>>674691542
>too late at night for sky.
1. Yeah, it’s so late it’s already bright day.
2. Archived: https://archive.is/69fPc
3. You didn’t mention the old thread though. Unpardonnable offence.
Where are all the other anons
who filled the ancestral thread
and new anons who replace them?
Were they all mod’s bots?
>>674691987
do you archive all these? did you archive last nights? if so, linky dinky me
>>674692160
Your bastard threads:
https://archive.is/bMSc3
https://archive.is/69fPc
For rightful inheritors, see >>674679815.
I archive everything. I’m trying to outdo NSA, NASA and NSDAP.
I lose to this one every time.
>>674692526
First anon on 4chan this morning.
Hi!
>>674692394
>https://archive.is/69fPc
no no, the ones from thursday night
>>674682465
You're welcome Lori
>>674692696
>no no, the ones from thursday night
Oh. Ask moot for that.
There actually exists a proper /b/ archive but I feel that mentioning it could be unmentionable. I don’t know whether that is permissible. Because nobody else mentions it.
>>674692934
oh come on dont be a jew
>>674680626
Lost. Who is she?
>>674693056
Okay, let me find it for you.
I try to pretend that it doesn’t exists
like everyone does,
so I use Archive.is, manually,
out of politeness for mods,
and never go to the real /b/ archive.
So I must go out to Google
and google it for you.
You see, I’m practicing 4chan-political correctness here.
>>674693370
Source: last thread.
See OP for archive
but no information there either
even in the filename.
That’s all I know.
>>674693441
a-okay
my sky thread died
this is the only one remaining
>>674693441
>>674693056
Not pasting direct URL
out of irrational and unverified fear
of Jackie Chan
and ghost of moot.
>Error: Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again.
My fear wasn’t baseless.
And I pasted merely a Google URL.
No direct URL.
Enter exactly this in Google:
>4chan b archive site:.jp
>>674693783
>my sky thread died
https://archive.is/r0t24
>>674694589
>>674694706
danke friend
>>674693370
Alterhacker is her Instagram I'm pretty sure
>>674694827
Mein pleasure.
Did you get to that website?
>>674695330
i got to one. whenever i search all that happens is "Whoops, looks like something went wrong"
>>674695438
Strange. Let me look closer at it.
>>674689598
>>674688720
What is it tho
>newfag reporting in
>>674695521
it's " f g t s . j p "right?
>Whoops, looks like something went wrong.
>>674695542
Nobody exactly knows.
It’s just old and something everyone knows.
I think she was just beautifully executed.
>>674695770
Right. You mentioned it.
Now I fear for your safety in 4chan.
P.S. I’m researching the problem.
>>674696104
i'll manage
i always have
>>674695825
But I came all this way
What is this "too soon" about?
I'm assuming she's dead, I just wanted the background info since I see her around a lot
>>674680285
Just the one
>>674696334
The only workaround I can think of at the moment
is using Google instead of its internal search engine.
Type into Google exactly this:
>keyword site:XXXX.jp/b/
...only replace “keyword” with your search
and “XXXX” with the archive server name.
>>674696336
If I knew I would tell you.
The problem is that I never found her pretty to bother knowing.
>>674696651
is there a way to specify date through google to narrow down the search?
>>674696961
Yes, click Google → Search Tools → Any Time → Custom Range.
It’s far from robust/fail-proof though.
But there’s a better method on the horizon...
>>674697292
>But there’s a better method on the horizon...
Actually no. I thought we could use thread numbers to restrict search.
Like this:
>keyword site:XXXX.jp/b/thread/63601*
But that’s not how Google queries work :-(.
>>674697550
im searching for the period between march 17-18 and using keyword hot celeb and celeb, as thats what i recall the thread being. do you not recall archiving threads like that on march 17 specifically?
>>674696961
If you know the exact thread number,
or ANY post number within that thread,
it should become very easy.
I wasn’t on /b/ two nigths ago.
>>674697871
well i've searched as much as possible but that particular thread must not have been archived
oh well
thanks for the help though compadre
>>674697788
Alternative idea: use the same query on Google IMAGES.
Images are often better to browse through.
>>674698263
still cant find it
>>674698666
Check.
>Your search - celeb site:fgts.jp/b/ - did not match any image results.
And that was whole March.
You’re right.
Can’t trust Google though, Google only pretends to be precise.
>>674698796
Oops. I mentioned the server.
And not blocked by the spam filter.
>>674698882
why would they care about the archive anyways? against any rules?
>>674679815
Too fucking soon anon
i aint letting us die yet
>>674698796
Actually it wasn’t whole March. Sorry. I keep trying.
>>674698964
Many anons hate archives. 4chan authorities don’t love them either. Reasons are too many and too vague to list them now.
But, as an experiment, try mentioning the name of the competing chan and see what happens. (It’s safe. But try and see how things work.)
>>674699156
Sorry about that.
>EITSHAN
ravioli ravioli, jackie chan give me the formioli
>Error: Our system thinks your post is spam. Please reformat and try again.
spoopy
>>674698666
fgts.jp/b/thread/663662697/
>ITT: Post you're literal 10/10 girl
>Sat 16 Jan 2016
Well, that’s not March.
>>674700176
yeah that's not it. i wanted to find it because it's the one where i met eczema bro. and im bored, mainly.
>>674700176
Date range in Google is unreliable, and especially unreliable for this archive apparently. This January thread came as a result of March search.
>>674700328
Did he mention the keyword “eczema”?
>>674700441
tried that, no dice
February here but possibly the same anon?
fgts.jp/b/thread/671524816/
>Feb 29, 2016 - What if I can't fap because I have eczema on my dick?
So either Google fails as usual
or their /b/ archive is incomplete.
Which is strange because any and every thread whereof I have the exact number is always there.
I THINK I SOLVED. WAIT.
>>674700572
maybe. maybe not. no way to tell.
fgts.jp/b/thread/665198328/#665219236
i found something of interest though. A weeb and others lament about how they will never be able to get high on heroin with sky. relatable.
>>674700804
unfortunately i dont have any of the numbers from the thread. though in the future i will remember to keep some in a file somewhere.
>>674700941
False alarm.
But I keep tinkering.
A convenient way to browse their archive
in absence of proper search:
>https://fgts.jp/b/gallery/45/
Gallery. 18 March. All threads.
>>674700999
Checked.
>>674701480
it needs to be march 17.
If all else fails, you can wait until they fix their search and then try it.
>https://fgts.jp/b/page/1235/
Page 1235 is 17 March. LOL.
Is 4chan really so vast?
Doesn’t seem so, judging by traffic in this thread.
>>674702095
jesus
>>674702329
>>674702095
Okay, it’s not that bad.
That link wasn’t gallery
and gallery is much more compact.
>https://fgts.jp/b/gallery/100/
Page 100 is 17 March.
>>674702692
>https://fgts.jp/b/gallery/100/
it isnt in there. it was specifically a celeb thread. something like "hot celeb" thread.
>>674684186
I don't know man. That girl looks like a less strung out Courtney Love which is meh.
>>674703205
i like her.
>just imagine
>lying in bed
>high in the sky on heroin
>snuggling with this qt3.14
come on
>>674703205
>Courtney Love
To clarify, you are talking here about Sky, not Frida Kahlo. I guess.
too soon assholes.
>>674690332
Very much want, just lost I think
>>674703397
Yeah, should have specified I meant the blonde girl.
>>674702855
Okay. The range for 17 March is
from https://fgts.jp/b/gallery/149
to https://fgts.jp/b/gallery/86
at this moment.
That’s 55 pages. LOL.
go into the night, my sweet thread
>>674702855
First 17 March thread number is >>674294817
and last 17 March thread number is >>674467079.
Save it :-P.
https://fgts.jp/b/thread/674294817/
https://fgts.jp/b/thread/674467079/
>>674704925
167000 /b/ threads per day?
I can’t accept unsolvable problems.
This is too simple to be unsolvable.
Fucking Google is obviously lying. There’s no way there is no mention of the word “celeb” in any of those 168,000 threads on 17 March.
Maybe they aren’t indexing it in real time.
>>674704872
Good night.
Don’t thank me. I was trying to solve it for myself. Because it’s good to understand archives. But I’m giving up.
I just wonder where all those anons are
if /b/ really has 167,000 threads per day.
Can a single wrong picture in the OP have such a devastating impact on a thread with the same title as the old thread?
>>674705821
whatever anon, it was fun. sweet dreams.
>i hope i dream of sky
>again
>>674706158
Sleep well.
Try their search again when they fix it.
>>674706158
Have you saved any image from that thread?
Try using its filename for search.
LOL.
I fancy going for a trip to Germany today.
>>674707070
>707070
nice get
>>674707310
Wow. I didn’t even notice.
Then I MUST go to Germany today.
I paid all my bills, so I’m free to go.
>>674680754
Not a qt.
>More like fugly
>>674707910
That was some other anon.
>>674707910
Lmao. She's so ugly her parents had to tie a steak to her just so the dogs would play sith her.
>>674708082
*with
>>674708082
that's a funny joke anon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bbj6KLZr4s
