Who would win /b/
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Who would win /b/
Apache 100% win just need ammo
>>674599270
some retard was trying to convince me that the archers would somehow get the arrows stuck on the rotors
>>674598793
Did a downie come up with this?
>>674598793
The apache is a strong thing, but 2000 archers.... Thats a lot of archers...
>>674598793
Archers, obviously.
The archers scatter and the helicopter eventually crashes from lack of fuel. Also not enough ammo
>>674599803
Underrated post
>>674598793
helicopter would run out of ammo
Archers, the sheer volume would eventually cause damage. This is assuming ofc that we're keeping them all within range of eachother.
>>674598793
Archers. How is the helicopter going to fly itself?
>>674599803
Dude CivRev is on my TV right now holy shit
>>674600256
would the archers be able to fire their bows with enough force to actually cause damage? probably not, aside from a few dents.
provided the helicopter has an adequate amount of fuel then it is obvious. even if it were to run out of ammo, it could simply fly into them
>>674600314
The one correct answer
Well how is the field of battle? if its indoors in a bunker archers will win cause apache cant move
Have you ever seen 300?
>>674598793
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1q925lmJPVs
>>674600589
>simply
of course
>>674598793
One Iraqi farmer:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/1425612/Iraqis-hail-peasant-who-shot-down-helicopter.html
>>674598793
Only if they are rambo
>>674598793
what era are we talking about here OP
if 1000 BC - all archers run away in fear
if 0 AD - all archers bow down to new god and forget christianity
if 1000 AD - all archers die to death to defeat the flying chariot of sata
if 2000 AD - all archers have explosive tipped arrowheads, long range bows, bulletproof gear, modern electronics and communications
if 3000 AD - all archers have jet packs and cloaking devices
if 4000 AD - all archers are able to teleport and have ESP
if 10,000 AD - there are no archers as everyone has left the planet
if 20,000 AD - apache helicopter is still forever alone
>>674600589
are you a helicopter pilote? Becouse that's not how an helicopter works
>>674602418
>the driver was an helicopter
>>67460264>>674602644
Mam its the police. Your archers have been run over. The driver was an an helicopter
>>674602644
wut? I mean you can't fly very fast that close to the ground or you will be garanted to crash.
>>674598793
archer why would they need so many?
>>674602271
This takes into the assumption that the archers will evolve but not apache technology.
checkmate atheists
>>674598793
>>674599535
I was just about to say, OP didn't mention whether the pilot or archers had some kind of retardation that would cause a slight hindrance at any point or if either side was borderline superhero. lol
>>674602271
Where are we going between 4K and 10K, and how are we getting there?
>>674603338
human technology has progressed beyond our capability to understand it and the singularity has occurred
new intelligent life has become hostile and booted us off the planet
civilization has restarted and now we live deep inside uranus
>>674598793
the chopper. the whole reason they switched from bows to cross bows was bows have very little penetration against anything with armor, those archers could fire till their arms fell off and and do nothing more than scratch up the paint job
apache all day, provided the archers are grouped relatively close together. steel arrows aint doing shit to metal armour designed to deflect machine gun fire
>>674604385
> being this uninformed