Rate this big tit slut for her nudes
>>674593176
I rate a perfect bigTittiedSlut/Nudes
saggy boobs/10
10.1/11
>>674593176
Overweight. You have no nudes.
>>674593176
What else do you have on the right?
>>674593532
if you think that's overweight then you're standards are too high brah. OP definitely doesn't have nudes though.
girl on the right is qt
>>674593176
If only ;( 10/10 of course
>>674593176
slam piggy on left is a 6.5/10 but probably fucks really well. qt on right is 7.5
dubs and we get nudes
>>674593660
It's a flattering pic, but the girl on the left is gonna be pretty heavy looking in a full body shot. Big arms, and I bet huge hips/thighs.
9/11 I would fuck those tits all night long
>>674593831
>>674594151
Nailed it.
>>674593176
irish?
>>674594151
he second pic OP posted. She's tall so it's still proportional. She's definitely not thin but if you think that's overweight enough to not make her attractive I guess we just have different ideas of attractive.
>>674594151
>implying big hips and thighs with big tits are a bad thing
Op will not deliver but still
8/10
>>674593176
Why, must OP comitt to being a fag? Delivering on gold? Rarity
>>674594371
I never said she was going to be unattractive. Big tits and a pretty cafe count for a lot. If fucked much heavier.
>>674594466
Learn the difference between implying and inferring.
>>674594897
Not the guy from that post but inferring would have been what he was doing, making an inference based on what you said. So it wouldn't have made sense for him to say inferring.
OP does not have nudes.
>>674595929
He incorrectly inferred a meaning frm my post.
Inferring.
